University of South Carolina Libraries
?i art? 888 i. Bsp This ? i Increase in V A comparison of the new in 1906 with the new business shows that the gain of the St of Georgia was greater than tl company in the United States, ; the "companies operate all over even in Europe. The State 1\ 'surance only in the Southern St business was obtained by less while some of the big compani /t.ooo to 8.000 aeents. These figures are compile surance Leader and from the I sued by the Spectator Company surance -publication. Bank. Company. 1. STATE MUTUAL LIFE of fii 2. Union Central 3. Kansas City Life 4. Columbian National 5. Federal Life 6. LaFayette Life 7. Capital Life 8. Greensboro Life 9. Security Life and Annuity (N. 10. Home Life 11. Bankers' Reserve, Omaha... 12. Reliance Life 13. Pittsburg Life and Trust 14. Columbia, Cincinnati 15. National U. S. A 16.. Travelers 17. Lincoln National 18. Commonwealth, Kentucky... 19. Indianapolis Life 20. Southern Life and Trust 21. South Atlantic, Virginia 22. 1 Beneficial, Utah 23. Volunteer, Chattanooga 24. Equitable, Iowa 25. Metropolitan ...... 26. Union Mutual 27. Majestic, Indiana 28. Central of Des Moines 29. Western and Southern 30. Hartford Life 31. Germania Life COMPANIES SHOWING 32. Philadelphia Life 33. Royal Union 34. American, Des Moines 35. Des Moines Life, Iowa 36. Bankers, Nebraska. at. luissoun oiaie Jjiie 38. Security Mutual, Nebraska 39. Northwestern Mutual 40. Southwestern, Dallas 41. Connecticut Mutual 42. Aetna Life 43. Provident L. and T 44. Security Life and Annuity 45. Citizens' Life of Kentucky . 46. Northwestern National 47. Michigan Mutual 48. Franklin, Illinois 49. United States, New York 50. Illinois Life 51. American Central 52. State Mutual of Massachusetts 53. Manhattan 54. National of Vermont 55. Fidelity Mutual 56. Massachusetts Mutual 57. Security Mutual 58. Mutual Reserve 59. New England Mutual GO. Union Central . 61. Inter-State, Indiana 62. John Hancock 63. Penn Mutual 64. Mutual Benefit 65. State Life of Indiana 66. Provident Savings 67. Prudential 68. MetroDoIitan 69. Mutual of New York 70. Equitable 71. New York Life Stat< c. J. R. i -v , : .v.". : x, : < ' 1. . .. +- ?***&< ? >:,t. . ' > ' j '<Bsammmes SI1 m > In r In turpi 'oiume business written written in 1905 ate Mutual Life lat of any other ilthough most of the country and lutual writes inates, and its new than 500 agents ies employ from d from The In5ocket Index is- \ r, a standard inIncrease. 1. $23,162,084 21.061.8^2 6,130,283 5,508,745 5,467,196 3,921,000 3,627,750 . .. . 2,418,700 .) 1,734,000 i,55i,57i .1,534,000 1,195,959 869,824 865,649 f 788,726 788,505 729,500 700,000 675,000 633,750 480,819 466,500 392,500 304,695 290,310 248,263 218,982 163,142 75,276 41,720 19,479 LOSSES. ?65,450 ?110,230 ?295,800 ?599,237 ?688,386 ?799,835 C9? IY7? ?? VMVjV ( U ?8ol,o5o ?1,139,519 ?1,398,771 ?1,682,069 -1,798,546 -2,145,679 -2,198,110 ?2,288,344 .? ?2,343,681 ?2,389,562 ?2,525,145 ?2,725,061 ?3,702,550 ?4,415,434 ?4,705,672 -4,722,269 ?5,045,962 ?5,557,600 ?5,667,149 ?5,688,299 ?6,138,700 ?6,571,486 ?8,779,384 ?9,383,832 ?11,011,102 ?11,238,954 ?12,209,557 ?14,073,468 ?19,526,239 ?34,245,961 ?98,252,369 ?133,370,195 ?147,369,557 3 Mi R. FOR' u ; ELA] e I r" I li'j 11'ii'iiiVi_Lijjju. jj_ijwbii ' ii'' I'"i'm I'i'iiT" mv% ir'ix (The Constitution, At nsm All 111 TnftrftflSfi Insuranc ises You State 1 TJERE is a list ol "*"* volume of bui Southern Compani< 111 of aliAiif fV? UOU a WUUt IITT1VV/ UU issued $3,000,000 i ern Companies. Sii the following tabl( holds intense intc heavy dividends. 1 Comptroller-Gener Compar STATE New York I Mutual Life . Equitable I Total What, t.ha flnmnnniflH Hid in ( V ? v/ from Company Reports ComptrollerRank Name No. of Poll Is8ue< 1. STATE MUTUAL OF GA 2,4 2. Penn Mutual 2,8 3. Mutual Benefit ...1,2 4. New York Life S 5. Southern States 4 6. Northwestern Mutual. 7 7. State Life 5 8. Empire Mutual 7 9. Union Central 8 10. Mutual Life '7 11. Prudential 7 12. Aetna 8 13. Citizens Life 3 c.,~ T p 1 OUli i-rliC J 15. Massachusetts Mutual 4 16. Provident Savings 3 17. Mutual Reserve 6 18. New England Mutual 4 19. Michigan Mutual 2 20. Equitable 3 21. Columbian National 2 22. Franklin 3 23. Reliance Life * 3 24. Fidelity Mutual 2 25. State Mutual of Massachusetts 2 26. Pacific Mutual ? 2 27. Reserve Loan 2 28. Union Mutual 2 29. Manhattan 2\ 30. National Life 2 31. Germania 2: ? 32. . Home Life n 33. *Missouri State i' 7A ^prnritv Mnfual II Jf~f. '-J 35. Volunteer State i< 36. Security Life & Annuity 11 37. Phenix Mutual.- L 38. Illinois Life 1; 39. Travelers Life < 40. *Life Ins. Co. of Va 1! 41. Connecticut Mutual 42. Washington Life : 43. Maryland Life "Issued and Revived. ntual Li rER. President. SOLID AS ' KE, Agen \ t lanta, Ga., June 30, 1907.) MH HMIHMi n BB HI nn ? of Volum >e Writte: ? *Rcad Hutual Life Leads fc i r the companies reporting to th< siness enjbyed by these companl 0s are indicated by italics. The I e amount of business of the "Big n Georgia in excess of the comt nee fixed expenses decrease proi placing the State Mutual far j >rest for policyholders concern These figures are taken from tl al: ison of State Mutual and "3 5 MUTUAL LIFE Afe iife .1 : Business of "Big Three" Seorgla. Figures Compiled Made to the Georgia General: I Icies Amount Average 1 Policy 40.. . $8,366,101 $3,428 ' 5.076,13* ^798 103 2,224,141..... 2,157 >43 2,115,170 2,243 46 i,954,ooo 4.381 05 1,906,300 2,703 35 1,768,570 3,305 38., 1,743,000 i... 2,335 ?8 1,617,306 1,885 34 1,583,542 1.294 71 I?325,39I 1'710 06 1,213,561 1,506 87 1,177,000 3,041 64.. 1,111,199 i,970 98 986,312 1,680 44 923,046 2,683 91 894,266 >. 1,294 17 872,928 2,093 17 802,967 2,389 17 673,112 2,123 17.. 610,762 2,814 91 539,661 ; 1,536 93 502,520 1,278 68..'. 497,646 M**0 33 467,787 2,007 41 467,558 ' 1,940 60 455,99? *>753 92 363,074 I?243 86 360,810 1,260 66 355,659 !?329 . 20 338,000 1,536 33 335,035 3,252 96 ' 329,342 I,68o 64 308,245 1,879 ^9 302,000 2,022 52 277,300 1,824 .175 OlCi - I 030 to 75 273,035 i,55i 55 198,304 3??5? Si 137,150 746 53 95,936 1,810 29 41,078 i,4*6 6 9,150 *>525 fe Iiisu Head Office: RO.1 rAT TTTV C^/^vT T^n' l nrv owo x . t, - Abl V,! ? > : : ."r : v V > . * - * ' i " yttrttrjap v r* ~yt * vt./a ^ ^ MiMHnlKsnviiiniMHMNiiMBHMMHnMniMWMivMni ITH S ii ihp m i Le of Bui n in Ge the Fig >r Georgia Result ) Georgia department, sh< les in Georgia for tbe year ] State Mutual issued in Geoi Three" combined. The Sti tined business of all the otl ?ortionately with increased ihead of all competitors ii ed in economical manag< le file in the office of th 3ig Three" in Georgia: $8,366,1( ...$2,115,170 1,583,542 .... 673,112 $4,371,J \ ft\ -I AA AAA *T^ ^ J&1UU,UUU Georgia Bon Deposited by Company wi Georgia Trea Protection o: 1 1 1 A... T\ _ noiaers. jxc of its Busine Semi-Aunual State of Geoi amm t7*rn JDUSlIieSiS JCJJLU Yearly by E: Actuary App by State of ( ranee ME, GEORGIA. H." ^QTrillo ! V UXVj I H / 1 J m >? I siness jorgia 1 ures! I owing the L906. The iM ge in 1906 ite Mutual bier South- pM I business, a Georgia, anient and ; ;|| e Georeria gistered 1 ds this -surer for ' iS [ i^oiicyjports ' :|i ss Made ||j ly t? 1 gia. M mined ' 'i| Vjrt^p Kpert m ointed 1 xeorgia. 1 x'-Ji g^4 "M Co. I Jm M Mm 8. C. 1 M J