University of South Carolina Libraries
LAWYERS AND CRIME. . . t Should a Lawyer Defend a Criminal When He ii Certain of His Guilt? If u lawyer knovvb I It u t hit> clhnt Ih guilty of murder ought h? CO defend Hi in iii fcourt, and If t?o J i.<? wli.it eXti'li l should llit k<> ni >iih derofift*? . j M ?* It > luWycl'H take tho pOHlllOH that, )T the client i?a>?i a satlbfact ory ft** for IiIh defense it in I lit* duty of < (i?* lawyer to do *>v?*i y ? It t it k possible in i>|reu$j)voiii .(lit? law and to obtain his aotjulUul, oveit to l In* ox tit tit of robbing a .-aft?. Oth era believe that lawyer# ;>houl oof by |i hair's broad Hi dt> anything in tjltyt- 'lie guilty from tin* coiiHo: t|U('iici>s of ?' i i i in ' or wrong doing, -v < >l In is, again, helhvc that a law yer Ih jtiHlifji-ti ? Iti Undertaking the d?*f?'ii^f ?.f a person lit- Knows I* Kiiilty, hul i hat lit nth a t line the lawyer doen bis wholi duty if In- see ' ti.it tli. ; >>? hi.,, |>r<M< riln tl hy law arc adlo'jt'd to tnd i h? trluj r,'"d ui t fd ;t< < onliuM l" I ho rule# ami practice* of Ho' court. i'liV- ??' I) "1 d to tin- Opinion that a lawyer iii. t alh i) tt poii fo lAilly w 1 in i 1 v e juries, play the iiiouu vlmnk or a ppoal with hlgU-HpuiidluK period# to (hi- I o w * * b t motives of ma K l.ni.1 to pavo any 1 vi'KOn who In db \ lotndj guilty. I( linn become M< recognized an pari of. 1 1 1 1 * p ti bill' proKOfiilor'H duly l ii'Hl In satisfy hiuiKolf of l lo* defen dant'^ kutlj l>? ?!????*? lit- indict*. Uo Di.U'sk shield tin- Innocent an woll art punlHh i h? guilty lias tin- lawyer or the defense* no like (Ilily <<i the : . t ; 1 1 1 ? When I lie hi" ydr becomes I hit advocate for a guil ty. man, iIim'h he Ioho h Ik individual moral responsibility for Judgment in tin- case as a man. 'rio- American liar, association, In I '.mi 7, appoint od a special committee, compound of the greatest lawyers and jurist In America to draw up a code of ethics fo>- the guidance of lawyers and in tho code that wan adopt t>il were- tho following para graphs: A lawyer may undertake with pro prloty ilir defense of a perwon ac-? .used of a crime, although ho know or bell even him guilty; and having undertaken it, lie In bound by all fair and honorablo meant, to proHont such defense as tho law of tho hand permits, to the end that no person may be deprived of life or liberty bnl by dU<S process of law. Hat the office of attorney does not permit, much less does It demand for any client violation of -the law, or any mariner of fraud of* chicanery No lawyer Is justified in substitut ing another's conscience for hl? own. A lawyer, should not do for his clii nt what his sense' of honor would forbid him to do for 'himself . Ho liuiy counsel and maintain only such actions and proceedings as appear t o him just. Colonel. L. II. Walker of this city ? ' if'od law on (ho same eir cu&^vjtfp Illinois as Abraham Lincoln, tolls flit' following story, which il lustrated Lincoln's attitude on this noted <|Uostlon Of A lawyers duty to a client lie believes to he guilty: An a f rocious murder Mad been com n* it ted| and a man, a stranger in t ho' c.Hinnunlty, was arrested for the crime. The circumstances all point ed to the guilt of the man, and pub lic feeling was strong against him. 1 1 e 'Was without money or friends, and wlwn the case was called for trial the Judge appointed Lincoln t ? defend him. On the trial Lincoln drew, from the witness full state ments of all circumstances. No ef fort was made to conceal one hit of evidence or to confuse -the court or .'he jury. At the. close of the case Lincoln arose and reviewed the case ; nd ended with this remark to the jury: , "1 have reflected much on this case, and, while It seems probable that- this man is guilty, 1 am not sure? Are you?" & Tii" jury acquitted the man, and afterward the real criminal was ar rested, coil v It ted and confessed his guilt. In that case Lincoln acted in! strict accord with the code of ethicsi law i laid down by the American as sc< i;t i ion. , So did the -lawyers who were ap-j point* d by the court to defend the' assassin of 1'residon; McKinley. TlU?y went into court in a dignified; way and produced every witness! < he assassin desired and drew out i all the facts of the homicide and stated the case to the. jnr\ with fair-' nc:-s. They saw that no undue ad-; \ antage was taken of the accused, I In; ? they did not try to put a straw! .n :hr way of the accomplishment : ef justice. J : : Kansas City in recent years there nvhs a case of two persons ? ?harmed with murder, both of them0 were guilty beyond the shadow of doubt, in which the lawyers adhered closely to this high plane of legal ethics prescribed by the American Mnr association. That was the case of Frank liottman and Mm. Ague Mycin, who logother murdered Clftr uucii Myorw, husband of Ague* ilOttllifjJl COUfOttttOd to till Oh* <it- ! tuilH of t In' (Irillift 1 m 1 1 1 . < 1 1 . 1 1 <? I > ati' i i* t? arrest, before ho It u<l retained a j lawyer, l.ali'r l?Y????d <*. l.'fiT wa: j retained by Hottman's relative* I o ? defend him. When bin case came I to trial, V(0t B Imply saw tha? every thing wii.H done according to law and that ho unfair advantages was! taken of Ills client, and at the clow of the KtutVM case ho introduced no] evidence, fwt mado a plea to tlx-! jury for nitr?7, basing it upon the | (heory that liottman "an a young man, that tin: Mycin woman watt much older and more ox porlenced: 'ban li., ami (hat Hhu had u gjv-t ' 1 1 1 1 1 u <? 1 1 < ? ? over him atnj that 1 1 m ? r' fore In- wa? cut it i < - d to'sojjfre degree of pit> Tim Jtiry found him gUllty of mniil. r in tin; first ?i?*K r?*?* ant) | lif wiiii Hotiti-m-i'd to hit hanged. | ?JoMph I i rooks defended Mrs. My * u, and IiIh every net in hor trial] dlgnlrled and in accord with the higncst code of professional ethics and yet In; it Id everything that h?-j could honorably do In hor defeus< . I fVe obtained a change of venue, It in i examination of witnesses penetrated every avenue that might load to] doubt of hor guilt, and aftor her; conviction He appealed hor Cane to j i iw> supreme court, and failing there ho went to tho governor and obtain ed a commutation of hor doath sen tence to imprisonment for lifo, on thi> ground that it wouhl bo Inhu man to hang a woman. Urfor aided justice by producing bin client liottman us a witness a g.'i'nst M rH. Nfyers, and aftor her Kcntoiuo had boon commuted ho per euaddd the governor to do the Kamo for his effort. I Lore wub a case in which two law yers did all posalbio for their cli ents and yot they did It wthout re sorting to qulbblo or chicanery. In marked contrast to the conduc of those cases was the defense of John Henry Collins, who murdt*ed his father In Topeka. There was no doubt of his guilt, either, but in his defense witnesses wero put upon the stand who again went upon the stand before the close of the case and stated under oath that they had been induced to swear falsely. In spite of all the quibbling and the efforts to defeat justice In his .case the jury convicted him, but his de fense was along a. subject of ad verse comment by high-minded law yers. . In marked contrast to tho conduc of the Myers and liottman case is I that more recent case of Iticord.tho I young man who lured tho Chambor | lain girl to a lonely spot near Shady ! Bend, Kan., and tarred her. The law yer defending the guilty men in that affair- quibbled and dodged and ! threw dust in an effort to blind i justice. ! Benjantine Butler, once governor! of Massachusetts, set an example to | lawyers that followed after h.lm {that has been condemned by lawyer : or high ideals and imitated hy the other clash. lie took the position that a lawyer had the right to take jthe case of any person, no matter ! how guilty, and to do every thing possible within the law to clear him. At one time he was retained for ja large fee to defend, a burglar j named Record, who had been guilty ! of a series of amazingly daring bur ? gtarles, ;i ml , who after escaping ar | rest for a long time, was captured j in tin* very act of taking a keV out ? o f a door. The key had been left ; in t he keyhole by the house owner 'during, the daytime, and the evident ; intention of the burglar was to car ry away the key and return at night > while the household was asleep and 'enter by the moans of the same key The only charge that could, bu pu against him was one of. larceny of the key as he had not entered the dwelling. In his defense Butler i pleaded that a key was part, of a door, a door was part of a house, a house was real estate, and there fore no conviction was possible be cause larceny covered only the steal ing of personal property, and the key was certainly real estate. The prisoner was discharged under this plea. Another time Butler was retained to defend one, lley ward. a noted burgh r. who was seen by a con stable forcibly to enter a railroad depot. The cons! bale followed to arr?*?r him. and the burglar seeing no means of escape, deliberatey shot 'and killed the constable. Butler dis covered that almost the only kind of j building not covereed by statute | making burglaries entry felony was! ; a railway depot, therefore ho plead - i ?'d in defense of the murdererthat in entering the depot he had not committed an offense for which he might have been arrested without a warrant, and that, as the constable had no wurraiit for hl? arrest, he hud uo right to make the arrest, a? thai in reMistiug him livywuril wua not relating legal arrrest, but had a right in law to bhoot in hi* own (k.ttUbo. 'I htb pli'u t>u ved tho ?<? OUWed, It i:? tltih ho rt of sharp prut-tic**, ilioiit prt vah-iu today than hi the lime of Jiut lei ,ihat has brought dm IVpUiO to tin: lugal profession itjl tt I*' red crick Ticvdi' Hill id n ? D 1 1> l he ia\v)i*t'H are very much in UOt d to SCO t hOIJIKld VfcJB UH tilts |> II l> - i?t sues thc-m, i,h '"Kit) Jnttglori t|t> fearer* of the law and mockers of "> majesty." . i i?cit? ijjii. i<t i it a gr^a; tlfitl ?<t liftilOUM denunciation , jby t !u? j#g'n,l] j i o?t umou, recently in Kantian City o' the: legal "Snitch'' or "ambulance ' > i ? ? ? ? i ' . ' 'i'lje snitch Ih an adjunct i" t Ji <.? huHliit'tsto of i ho lawyer who MinrUs it practice of taking personal injury suits against corporations. But many corporation lawyers are ?rl'iiii|y an unethical in tln-lr- j> r.t < lice Utt tin: ;lin?h. He Jh train<l ill h i h side tii law until ho Jfl)Q\V* every decision po riuinlug to his buHliJCihw. Ilu goes into t lit; t rift I wli|i but one definite puiposu, to trick tin* court iiito hoi??< eppor which will upset 'Hit; \ t ? pd let on up peal, IJq nipped a: ho is, ho gen?r ally succeeds in luring ilu? Judge 1 1 1 1 <> some technical mistake In pa. ng hurriedly on tho' multitude ol objections, requests, motions and e:< <epiit?uw h icli he. makes and if the voititi ih against him ho can nil back and laugh in hi* sleeves us it Is rend 0 red, knowing that, it will bo reversed i n the appelate . court. it ,is Interesting it) observe one Of these professional "excoptolners" at. work during a trial of a murder case or damage HU.it against ft large corporation, The professional "oxeoptioner" en gagod in the case for no other reas* Oil except iiis none for errors and Ills deftnesB in luring the court into technical mistakes alts beneath the shadow of the Juilgo'H bouch ami apparently sleep. Hut he never ;dee pa, He sits with closed eyes, but he ia listening with every boiiho alert. Suddenly he pops up with an exception, and when ho has made it' he drops down agalnandBinks In to apparent somnolence. He objects to everything. Half .the time of taken 4up in noting his ex ceptions. And he often defeats, the verdict of the jury after week and even months of costly litigation. It was so in the last trial of Dr. Hyde. ? Justice David Brewer used to tell a story of one of these "exception ors". During the trial of an im portant-case the question was asked of a witness: "And what did Mary say?" The head of the "exceptioner"sho up above the judge's bench with the exclamation: "We except, your honor." A Jong argument followed as to whether it would be right in law for the witness to answer the ques tion and tell what Mary said. The court ruled that the question was improper and an exception was sav ed. After the verdict was rendered the- other side appealed and the su preme court reversed the case and remanded it for new trial, with the instructions to the court to permit tiie witness to tell what Mary said. On the second trial the same ques tion was asked, and the witness answered: i, 'Mary didn't say nothin." Justice lJrewer used to say tha*. a lawyer was a disgrace to the pro fession who. did all things for the sake of an acquittal, who went into court for his client and delayed the trial by strategy until public feeling had died down, or witnesses had disappeared or their memories be came uncertain, who strove to get a friendly jury on the panel, or; who sought to get into the record some technical error to reverse the case or who did anything to weary justice and enable the guilty 16 es cape. That, he said, was not the province of a lawyer. Ou the other hand, Jeremiah Ev arts, one of the greatest lawyers this country ever had, was greatly disturbed when he was considering entering the profession . of . law, I whether ho could honestly engage in a pursuit in which half the time he would be struggling to maintain jus tice. lie finally came to this decis ion: That any cause that was fit for any court to hear was fit for an lawyer to present on either side, and that neither the judge nor coun sel had a right to prejudice the case until both nidrs were heard. Opposed to this oppinion was that of Beverly Johnson a leader of the American Bar, who discovering in the niidst of a trial that the man ho was defending was guilty, when he assured him he was innocent, arose and walked out of court and refused to touch the case again. And there was the act ton of Hen ry Clay Dean, a famous Missouri lawyer of the early days, who was called on by a man accused of a crim^ and who aakCd Llemi to do 1 fflld "tiim "'?lit did you do ?? thin thlAg?", l)*'nn H?k<*d bl hi. jj The nmu said he wuti guilt y. "Then." Httld Dean, "J ahull no! <l?/?l)rt you, VOU OUght to |>o shot j out of u to^j iot camion through a bil rh^d wire fence Htralght into hell." Along t h it) mil mi 111,4. Ull* | he uc-j ' 4 ' i 1 Of t (.). Tichejioi . -01141 of the ! ? li'.iHH lit tllu ll'K'll protoSMlou ill 1 K;tiiHUh City A nuui U(it , ltl f(|||1 and ntai od that j,,. |1U(| rn)l i'-aru.d to well a certain pit ? ?f ri al omul,, for ?t certain price, but J "?m ho could sell It to another per-j M,M for annuel, larger i? i ic-c |( j,,. ?'?Uld onl> t?r?aU the conn art of ?M<ji l?.. had made-. lie a;>k?d Tirh< ho r if he <-ould, break tiiut contract. 1 ha vo no doubt it might be "loin-." answered Tlchenor. ?Will you do ill for trio?'! asked the man. $ ?lj? i I aid 'I i( lienor in his p0_ 1 < ullar drawling method of speaking, I < '>nld do 1 1 . l>u' to tell you ( Mi-' ? i lit h i would ii'?' ilari' io touch l| " "Wty not?" Well," 1 hei ? an old fellow iilj iwwn who w.'lcli,.;, everything |j ?lo. il<> jiihi keep# on my trail all; ho tlWio, and If l should *jo h dJ* honorahlo thing like that the old fed low won id n t give mu any real a} all. He'd j list keep jabbing anil JuWdug nie uiitll I couldn't even sleep. "Who is that old fellow?" asked ; the man. O Tlchron, i k 1 1 1 h neahie,'' j a n aw erod Tichoron. A lawyer Who Is now defending a Person accused of a HerioiiH crime1 Ma<(l of hi? action in that^can*; "Lawyers are ex*offlcio members' of the court, and they have no right | in law to refuse lo defend a person ! accused ?f erlmo wiltill directed by' thu court to represent hin?. In such I cases a lawyer often defends a cli ent for whom lie has no sympathy.1 In -the Kahio way it is the duty of a lawyer to take the defense of a client wlfo pays him a fee for It, "o "latter if he does know that the accused is guilty. even of murder. The principle at stake is the uniforr and orderly administration of Jus tiee, which is far more important lhan the conviction of any particula person or the punishment .of any particular offense. The law presumes ?yery person accused of crime to be innocent un til he is proved guilty, and it is as much the duty of a lawyer to de-' fond to the utmost of hlsability a| person he knows to be guilty as ono lie known to be innocent. if any other course were followed it. would result in great injustice. Look, for Instance, at the case of Mrs. May brick,wiho was convicted of the mur <ler of her husband in England. The verdict of the jury in the case, al-j though it decided her fate, merely recorded the opinibps of the twelve men who rendered it and did not decide the question of her guilt or innocence, because that crime is as much of a mystery now as it was! when done, and the British govern ment itself admitted that there was toubt when it paroled Mrs. May-j rick a few years ago after she had! served many years in prison. .'Look at the Beecher-Tilton con troversy, too. The long trial in that ease did not locate the full truth to the satisfaction of the pub-! ijc. And the jury that convjcted ! lie assassin of Garfield and declare , that he was sano did not tell the truth. Everyone knows now that! ne was insane. "And so I say that for the sake! of the general principle involved a lawyer should give every effort in the defense of an accused person, whether he knows or not that he guilty. "?Kansas City Star. Give us your uext order for job printing. F or S n I o. Ill acres of land on Adams 'Mill j road 7 miles East of Camden. Two J horjso farm open and undor cultiva tion,; balance of tract In wood and pine timber. One 4 room dwelling, barn and stables, also cotton house. All new buildings. For quick sale we offer this at a bargain. 7 5 acres of land i) miles South oast of Camden on Camden-Darllng tgi public road; 2 5 acres open and under cultivation; 20 acres of long j\nd short loaf timber, balance in wood land; one 3 room dwelling, barn and stables; good running water through place. This is a good small farm and can be bought for $1600. 18 5 acro.s of land 7 miles from Camden on Darlington-Camden road 30 acres open and under cultivation balance In wood with some pine tim ber. 12 acres in past ure-under wiro One four room dwelling, barn and stables, also small cotton house. Price $8.00 per acre. Farm of J. R. and S. H. Trues dale, 1 1 miles north of Camden, S. C. This tract contains 131 acres; 75 acres open land, mostly lovel; 1 4-room dwelling, 2 tenant houses, 2 good springs of water. Apply to C. P. DuBose & Co., Agents. One Dollar Per Y ear is all The Chronicle will Cost Head The Chronicle thru carefully ? all of its eight home print pages, and then honestly pass judgment on it. If you think it worth the price hand a dollar to any one of the young ladies in The Chronicle Piano Contest and help them win the piano now on display at Crosby's store. Kimball Owners A List of Satisfied Kimball Owners in Kershaw County. Mr. J. H. Clark, .Mr. T. J. Smyrl,' Mr. J. A. Johnsoon, Dr .S M. McCaskill, Mr. It. L. Mosoley, Mr. T. P. Brown, Mr. E; S. Gardner, Mr. F. E. Sparrow, Mr. J. 1. Bowers, Mr. A. J. Gregory, Mr. R. E. Rollings, Mr. A. F. Young, Camden, S. C. Camden, S. C. Camden, S. C. Camden, S. C. Camden, S. C. Camden, S. C. Camden, S. C. Lugoff, S. C. Kershaw, S. C. Kershaw, S. C. Kershaw, S. C. Kershaw, S. C. Mr. J. W. Cunningham, Kershaw, S. C. Mr. FY C. Edgeworth, Kershaw, S. C. Mr. M. A. Shaw, Mr. R. W. Gregory, Mrs. Jas. H. Clyburn, Mr. G. A. Rhamo,J : Mrs. J. R. Dinkins, Mr. J. S. Rhame, Mr. H. T. Johnson, Mr. F. D. Campbell, Miss Nannie Brannon, Camden, S.' C. Mr. S. R. J. Smith, Camden, S. C. Mrs. N. F. Bauskeit, Rev. E. A. Thompson, Mrs. B. McClairn, Mr. J. M. Stewart, Mr. \V. O. Croxton, Capt. Li. L. Clyburn, Kershaw, S. C. Kershaw, S. C. Camden, S. C. . Camden, S; C. Lugoff, S. C. Camden, S. C. Bethune, S. C. Camden, S. C. Camden, S. C. Bothbne, S." C. Bethune, S. C. Camden, S. C. Kershaw, S. C. DeKalb, S. C. These Pianos Were Sold in this County by J. W. Melton and each in strument carries Kimball Guarantee. One Dollar