University of South Carolina Libraries
Governor Blea Record ^ * His Speech at Bishopville Ca day, In Which He of His C > . At the State campaign meeting at * Bishopville on Wednesday, Governor I Blease delivered an address which created a sensation throughout the n. - State. He said: For six months before the opening thi? ramnaien. Mr. Jones, who is a candidate for governor, has been going around throughout the State, calling me an anarchist, and those "who support me, anarchists, and denouncing what he termed "Bleaseism" as anarchy. ? * I have also made many speeches throughout the State* but have never, | on any occasion, c?41ed his name or ^ made any reference whatever to his * personal or political records, because I did not consider it gentlemanly or honorable to abuse a man, or to criticise him harshly, where he had no opportunity to make reply; but, on the contrary, have conducted my campaign upon a high, and honrable plane. In my opening speech at Sumter, I did not make any reference to any special candidate in this race, nor f did I make any attack upon the record of any of them. The attacks which f*- were made upon me are fresh in the minds of tne peopiew i\one can *<ty > that I have brought about the personal feeling which is in this campaign, nor can anyone say truthfully that I j have condescended to the plane of a | blackguard or a blatherskite, but have ; conducted my campaign strictly as a gentleman should do, and whatever may be the future results of this campaign, or whatever low plane it may be thrown upon, personally or politically, none can say that it was brought about by me or my friends. God Almighty has never planted in the breast of man a higher or holier spirit than that by which he is prompted to resist oppression, and when one is attacked, none would be so cowardly as to deprive him of the right to strike back in his own defense; hence, what I am going to say now is in the defense of myself. The term, "Bleas ism," was not originated by me; there- \ fore, I am not responsible for its use. j I now propose to give you some of j the public record of Ira B. Jones, as J made by him when a member of the hpuse of representatives, when speakA** r\-r +V>A VtAneo nf ronrocontativA^ ? CI VJJL IliC UVUCt V/JL t vuvu |.WV? . V~| . when associate justice and chief jus-! tice of the supreme court, and to show I you that however bad "Bleasism" may j be, it is not as bad as "Jonesism," and 1 that Blease, when acting in any pub- j lie capacity, or in private life, has never endeavored to force social! + om/Mior +V> r\ white 1-9/I i AC 9 Tl H i ^4 uant-j auivug ??***w ?*** v% children of this country, with the negro men, and that Jones has done so, and that Blease has always worked ; for the interest of the people of the j State, and that Jones has worked for j the interest of the money powers and j the corporations. Mr. Thurmond, who boasts that he j is Jones campaign manager, auu iux which I presume he is being paid by some one, in a letter which he sent out on the 25th of March, 1012. either deliberately and maliciously (or being ignorant of his candidate's record) endeavored to mislead the people, to whom he sent that letter, by stating something in it which was absolutely untrue and not borne out by the records of the legislature. He stays, (writing of Jones and him-1 self), "We were both in the house as j Tillmanites;" which I think is true, \ judging by the votes which Jones al- ; , ways voted, and particularly his nomi-! nation speech in seconding Col. Irby j for the United States senate against General Wade Har^pton, for which 1 have no criticism tc mke 01 mm, dui 1 only mention it in order that the rec- i ords may be kept straight, he having ! been elected speaker, to succeed Col. j Irby,. which was part of his reward lor his speech, and for his support of ' Col. Irby against General Hampton, j I think he further proved that when j he voted against Judge William H. -- - A ,? 4.1, ? Wallace ror associate juoutc ui uie i * supreme court (see house journal, I 1891, page 171), and again when he j voted to turn Judge Wallace, who had | done as much or more to redeem South, i Carolina from negro rule and republi- , canism as any man in the State, and : vx-hon most assuredly. if he was not I entitled to a promotion, was entitled i to be left on the bench as a circuit i judge for his entire lifetime, for the ! services which he had rendered, and I. because of the fact that his record as j ' * judge was pure, clean and absolutely j one of good judgment and strong abil- | ity; yet, Jones voted to retire him to se Cites r\f In Here -Fnnpc IJm 1/ 11 n ^ w v v* mpaign Meeting on WednesReviewed Record )pponent private life, that lie might die as a private citizen, heart-broken, conscious of the fact that his services had been so little appreciated that a legislature of his own State could humiliate him without excuse, with defeat. , ! Mr. Thurmond further stated, "ne (speaking of Jones) was a strong advocate of the dispensary and is now a local optionist" Let's see: Jones voted for prohibition, see house journal, 1891 page 203, and again, same house journal naps 227. Jones voted for county r?o ~ prohibition, see house journal, 1891, page 578; voted for the Roper and j Childs bill, which provided for State- j wide prohibition, see house journal,! 1892, pages 225, 312, 314 and 324. Jones j voted against the dispensary law when it was first and originally passed. The house had passed what was known as j flio PAnan on/1 Hhil/la hill Sf?tf>-Wide AVV^/Vl umi. w*?y ?>w.w ^ prohibition, for which Jones had vot-j ed all the way through, and it was sent J to the senate. It was amended in the I I senate and the dispensary law was j sent back to the house as the amend- 1 ment to the Roper and Childs bill. | Jones voted against the amendment, i wThich was the dispensary law, see j house journal, 1892, page 573. When | did Jones turn from being a prohibi- j tionist, as proven by every one of his; votes, and as proven by his vote against the original dispensary law, to a dispensary man? Was it when he wanted to be promoted to associate justice of the supreme court, and when the dispensary people had abso- | lute control of the government and; legislature, which was to elect the as-i sociate justice? Go a step further: | When the fight was being made in the, legislature to keep a dispensary from : bein# forced into Marlboro county,: Jones voted to force the dispensary in | Marlboro, without allowing the people j to vote as to whether they wanted it! or not, thus depriving them of local I self-government, see house journal, j 1893, page 465. He also voted against j local option and to force the dispen-, sary in dry counties, see house journal \ 1883, pages 467 and 468. The impor-! tance of this vote is so great, in viev\* j of hisv recent political somersaults,' that I beg leave to quote it here in full, j see house journal, 1893, page 467: Mr.1 ^ K\t rrtol/ino' tVi o ! DU15L 111^ v cu LU aUiC'iiU WJ iiiuxxius, , 1 following section 41: (the house then j having under consideration the dis-; pensary law): "No part of this act j shall apply to any town in this State, that prohibits the sale of liquor under charter. Also, all counties in which j the sale of liquor is prohibited by i statutory law; Provided, that at a gen- j eral election, two-thirds of the regis-1 tered voters of said counties express by ballot a desire for the establish- i ment of a dispensary therein, then, in f>iof ovpnt a Hisnensarv may be estab-' V ? V** V vv V?-H.r w . lijshed within, the limits of some; town or city within that county." Mr. j Nettles moved to lay the amendment on the table. The yeas and nays were j rpniipstprf and the first man recorded as voting in the affirmative and: against this amendment, which pro-: hibited the putting of dispensaries in j dry towns and dry counties, and which ! gave to the people of those towns and j counties the privilege of local option, is Ira B. Jones, speaker. When did he j become a local optionist, after he | could not force liquor on ary couuues. j Having voted for State-wide prohibi- j tion all the way through, he then j flopped over to the dispensary, and j then voted every crack to force the i dispensary into prohibition territory, \ which had always been so called, "dry counties," When he flopped from pro- j hibition, he double somersaulted and out dispeusaried the dispensary's daddy, as is shown here by his record, j Now, did Mr. Thurmond, when he wrote this letter, know Jones' record, ( or did he. attempt to deceive?, for Jones certainly was not "a strong ad- j vnfflte of thp disnensarv." and he cer- ! tainly was not a local optionist when i he had a right to vote and give local option to the people; but he voted to deprive them of it. When did his conversion to local op- i tion take place? since he entered the | rafp fnr ffovemor. Jones mav have! been converted about the time that th<- j house took out of his hands the ap-j pointment of a certain committee, j which had always been appointed by j J ... V ~ r. I the speaker, ana ai uie uiue wucu uc; got very angry and resigned from the speaker's thair, see house journal, 1894, page 552, showing a complete loss of control of himself, just as he did when he got mad because he could not be governor and chief justice both, | and resigned the high and honorable j position of chief justice (which is for, | a term of two years, at a salary of |three thousand dollars per annum), i run for governor, (which is only for J a term of two years, at a salay of! thee thousand dollars per annum). But, he says he is a great moralist; j yet, he voted to have a divorce law in South Carolina, see house journal, 1892, page 235, thus endeavoring to break down the great moral bulwark | which South Carolina boasts so much of. I cuppose he has climbed back on: the moral pinnacle, since he could i not make the divorce law, while he; was practicing at Lancaster, in order that he might make some handsome fees in the divorce business. "When we were struggling to relieve ourselves from the exorbitant rate of interest which was being charged in this State, and when the money-lenders were robbing the people with usury, Jones was in the speaker's chair, as speaker of the house of rep- j resentatives, and when Mr. Magill, of Greenwood, moved to reconsider the vote whereby the house had indefinitely postponed the bill to reduce the legal rate of interest and to prevent usury, a motion was made to lay the motion of Mr. Magjll on the table; Ira B. Jones voted to lay Air. Magill's motion on the table, and thus kill the i bill which would have reduced the le- j gal rate of interest and would have j prevented usury in this State, seej house journal, 1894, page 214. Was j Jones representing the moneyed interests and the corporations then, as he j is doing today, or was he trving to i help the poor man, by voting to allow j usury? Now, I understand he has gotten to fi.ian/1 nf tVia nnnr man vet Ut: Cl g I C<1 L 111U1U IU\, j;vu? 1UUU , j v, v,, | when we were fighting so hard in the legislature to get a labor law to pro-; tect the poor laboring people of this j country, Jones voted against the j amendment and in the interest of the \ cotton mill owners and bosses and against the laboring man, see house journal, 1892, page 358. Jones voted ogainst my motion and with Haskell * ~ ~11+Vi,-, r?iillifinonf the law LU dliv ? Li-IC UUliiiiVUtiVAi wa. - .. , by working the operatives' one hun-1 dred and ten hours extra. When did ! he get converted into such a friend of the laboring man? His votes do not show it. There are many other things in con-! nection with his record as a member ; i of the house of representatives that j I nugnt can 10 your auemiou, uui. time, will not suffice; however,\there j is one thing that I know he is partic-, ularly proud of, and know that his j friends would be very much disap-! pointed if I did not' give his record on : it; hence, under no consideration would I overlook it. When they were fighting so hard to ; fcppn members of the legislature from i using free passes, Jones voted for free passes, see house journal, 1891, page; 354. The newspapers stated that when he was asked about it, his reply j was: "Yes, they offered it to me and I! took it, and I will take part of the; if tho-ir will crivp if tn mp " That X V?U 4 4. VMV J ?f *** O* ? V V VV ? ^ was all very well and good; but, let's; see: Did he have that free pas in hispocket when he made the record which j I am now going to cite? In 1890, see j house journal, 1890, pages 76, 90 and< 376, when I introduced a bill to proviso fnr wnaratd pnafhpc fnr white and colored people in this State, Jones i voted to kill the bill and have no sep- \ arate coaches. It was said to have j been the first separate coach bill ever j introduced in the South. As to that, j I do not know; but I know that it was the first, or among the first, ever in- j troduced in South Carolina. In 1891, when we were again having a hard fight, endeavoring to relieve j the white ladies, your wives, your j mothers, your daughters and your! cMvoothpnrts frnm ridine in the same! W,.. ? I coach, in a seat right next to and sometimes jammed up against a big' black negro wench, or a stinking negro \ buck, Representative Wigg, a negro I member of the legislature from Beau- j fort count}*, moved to indefinitely: nostDone the bill, which, of course, i meant to kill the bill and have no sep- j arate coaches. Jones voU.-d :or the j motion and against separate coaches,, see house journal, 1891, page 262, and with the negro, Wigg, co make your mothers, wives, daughters and sweethearts rirte in t.hp same cjache.? With big buck niggers. I voted against tie motion, and for the bill. T^u:. he was not even satisfied with that; on page 276, house journal of IS'Ji, lie again voted against the bill, when V7igg moved to kill it; and, even after -he j went home and slept and dreamed ov- | pr thp mflttpr }ip bacit to the I legislature, and in 1893, see house j journal, 1893, page 186, he again voted ; against separate coaches. But, home; he goes again and comes back, and in j 1894 we find him again work nj an.lj to seuai'st.* r.oaoh ! f -? I.J.XA C WW law, see house journal 289 4, pages 31C | and 312. Did be still haze big free j pass in his pocket; was he au attor- | ney for a railroad? 1 60 not know., and do not accuse him of it, but the j records show that on every vote, when the opportunity was afforded Mm 10 j prevent social equality in South Caro- j lina, he voted to force wmte ladies j and white children to associate wi*h free negroes, by traveling in the same coaches with them; by forcing them to drink out of the same water glasses: bv forcing them, in some instances, to use the same toilets; by forcing them to sit so close to them as to smell the filthy odor which they throw off. Every time he had the opportunity to prevent that he voted against it j and in favor of the railroad corpora-1 tions who were fighting it. That is j i some of his record gentlemen. Has Candidate Jones stood by the negro? His recent convention refused to pass a resolution favoring the repeal of the fourteenth and fifteenth amendments to the constitution of the United States, which places the negro on equal footing of citizenship with the white man and deprives the State .r?f thp nVht tn riisfrprinhise him. This resolution was introduced by Mr. J Wannamaker, of Orangeburg. All of the other Southern States favor it The Jones . corporation convention committee reported it unfavorably and tLus putting themselves on record as opposing the repeal of these clauses, while all the other white 'people and all the Southern States do. This is the cap-stone corporation Jones, fighting | against separate coaches and in favor of negro equality, places upon his disgraceful corporation, record as legislator, judge and delegate. Now, you have heard some painting of "Bleaseism." Which do you Drefer. negro equality and association,; such as he attempted to place upon j you, or freedom and independence! such as I have given you? Which do you want? "Jonesism" or "Bleaseis:n," as he sees tit to call it? Now, he passed on to the supreme j court. What do we find there? I will tell you one thing you will find, I that while he was on the supreme bench, and while he was chief justice, j his son, who was looking after a bank, > and a grocery business and a stock business over here at Lancaster, was riding around on railroad passes as a railroad attorney. Just as soon as Jones quit being chief justice that boy Km'n/v i 1 rno A attnmPV "WhV? l^UXL UUUg luilivuu w?w. . Was he not just as good a lawyer as he had ever been? Oh! No. Pa was , no longer on the supreme court bench, j and the railroad no longer needed! Lawyer Jones. He may say he re- j signed; possibly he did; so did Pa. j The Lawyer Jones is out of a job; so 1 is Pa. The lawyer though may get T>.-? Ktif if nrAn 'f anouier one^ su iiici,y uui il vj be governor. What about some of his decisions in j favor of corporations, when he was on the supreme court bench: Take the case of Taylor vs. A. C. L. j R. R. Co., 78 South Carolina. This is! a case in which a white lady of good : standing was put off of a train at! Green Pond, in the midst of a crowd j of drunken negroes, who violently pushed and jostled her, abused her * V, nnaanliM noinff Q n c> wiixi menacing opctvuvu, uuiu^ .f1 and obscene language, etc. The agent of the company* ran off, telling her that he was going to get his pistol, but he never returned, leaving this1 lady there among that throng drunk- j ? " V. mai? f + on-ftmof I 611 116grO&a. One Uiuugui sun, agauioi | tte Atlantic Coast Line railroad and i the jury gave her a verdict of ten j thousand dollars. A motion for new i trial was made and Judge Dantzler re- | fused it. But, lo and behold, when they got into the supreme court, the distinguished corporation lawyer, Jones, wrote the opinion of the court and said, among other things: "It is not th^e duty of a common carrier to provide escorts tor unattended ladies," and winds up his opinion by saying that the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, thus depriving this lady, who had been so outrageously and indecently treated by a corporation, of all the money which a jury of her county had given her and which that inet and flhristian iudse. Dantz V J _ ? - ! ler, had sustained. We find Justice i 7 l (now chief justice) Gary dissenting! from Jones. Again, Corporation Jones saved the corporations ten thousand dollars, and the poor white lady, insulted by a crowd of drunken negroes, deprived of her rights and the money n nmmiv inrv ^tVlP W IIiUUL a ^V/llCLVll W/uaauj J V** J Vv?^ EIGHTEEN county which, he claims was his father's home county) had given her. He must have great respect for the juries of his father's home county. See also the case of Oxner vs. Western Union Telegraph company, 82 South Carolina reports, page 510; 63 Southeastern reports, page 545. This was where a white lady, a widow, paid twenty-five cents for a telegram to be delivered in Newberry, asking after her two children, at the towihla firo tt'Vl i/>h A tllllC Ul ui ^ ?? mavu stroyed a large portion of the town of Newberry. The telegram was never delivered. The jury gave her a ver- ! diet, which Judge Ernest Gary upheld. But, lo and behold, when it got to the supreme court, Corporation Jones wrote an opinion in which he set aside 1 the verdict, making the poor widow I i? + tVio ! pay me cus>is, uuinHUfliuu?m6 ?^, fact that the Western Union Telegraph company kept her twenty-five cents for something they had never done. However. w? are not surprised, for John Gary Evans was the Western Union Telegraph company's counsel in the case. Chief Justice Pope dissented and said that the widow was entitled to recover. Corporation Jones not only took her verdict away from her, but stole her quarter and gave that to the Western Union and made the poor woman pay the costs. Again, in the case of King vs. Atlantic Coast Line railroad, 86 South Carolina reports, page 510: This was a case in which the plaintiff shipped some goods over the Coast Line which were lost in transit, xne magistrate in. Darlington gave the plaintiff judgment for his lost goods and $50 penalty. Judge Sease sustained the magistrate's decision. The corporation, of course, appealed to Corporation Jones; Corporation Jones wrote the decision, in which he reversed the magistrate and the circuit court as to the $50. Mr. Justice Gary dissented, standing by the side of the magistrate and the circuit court, but Corporation Jones controlled and the citizen was deprived of his rights, as usual. . Again, see the case of Kirven vs. Virginia-Carolina Chemical company, 58 Southeastern reports, page 424. i Here is one of the greatest corporations in this State, and one which South Carolina herself has had much trouble with. After this plaintifE had recovered his verdict against this corporation and combine, before that honest and Christian judge, Klugh, we find Judge Gary and Judge Watts saying that the judgment should be affirmed; but, along comes Corporation Jones saying that the judgment should be reversed. Again, we find Jones favoring the. corporations and the mighty of the mightiest, and that to the detriment of one of our own citizens; one who had helped, in his humble way, as a member of the legislature, and otherwise, to promote the welfare of his State. I have heard the question asked, "What did that decision cost the V. C. C. Co.?" There are many others, but I only mention these as a sample of the justice meted out. Examine carefully and see if it is not a fact that Jones was always in favor of corporations, particularly the Southern railway, of which his son was the attorney, and see if you do not find that only when he was against them was when the court was unanimous, but whenever j there was an opinion for the railroads cr a divided court on a railroad case, that you found Jo'nes siding with the corporations, the railroads. Why did the Southern railway have son Charles, with his pass, in Columbia in the Merger case? Did he question any witnesses? Did he speak? Or, was he there, getting paid, in case an ap"i Vior? f^ Kn moHo tr> nst 9 TTnTO Hirl jJOdi uau >.U UC U1UUV w .. ? ? pa and Charles get so immensely rich practicing at little Lancaster? I regret to go into these matters. Two years ago we had a clean campaign, a crowd of gentlemen running for governor, and on so high a plane was the campaign that when one would go back to the hotel, out on the street with his friends or somewhere in a shady nook for rest, because he knew that his opponents were not going to say one word about him or make any criticisms of his public or private record. It was a pleasant rax;e; it was free from abuse and vituperation, and if I had the privilege of choosing, would choose such a race for this campaign; but, nine months ago, I was put on notice of.what was coming, and in the last few months,* it has been repeated time and again by abuse of me, in my absence, and while I regret the course things have taken, I have conducted myself upon a plane of dignity, such as :s becoming of the chief magistrate of your State; but, the right of self-defense is prompted by God in his creation of man; it is guaranteed in the constitu tion of our republic and of our State, and I presume none would be so mean as to deprive me of it; therefore, I strike back, and in no uncertain way. Let the consequences be what they may, the responsibility will rest upon my traducers and those who have seen lit to ;vilify and abuse me, and not upon me and my friends. >OTICE A>M AL MEETING. The annual meeting of the stockholders of the Farmers' Oil Mill will be held in the court house at 11 o'clock on June 21. All interested will please be present in person or by proxy. W. C. Brown. Secretary. *.&' ' ' .. .... . .v BARBEtTES. I will furnish a firs: class Barbecue at my home at the late J. A. Cromer's old home place on Saturday, July 32. Dinner, gentlemen, 45c., ladies 35a There will be plenty of amusement for the young people. J. A. Felker. Cliurch Barbecue. Church Barbecue at Pomaria July 4. Speeches by prominent gentlemen ! the forenoon and higii class baseball in the afternoon. Dinner 40 and 50c. Wp will give a. first-olasR barbecue i at the oYung Brick House, six miles 1 from Whitmire, Thursday, June 27. The dinner will be first-class in e?ery respect and everybody is invited to attend. All candidates are especially invited to attend. T. B. Riser. N. B. Johnson. TEACHEB WANTED. " - -Vj Wanted, a teacher in Broad River school, District No. 24, for a term of seven months at a salary of $40l Must come highly recommended. Apn]ir.ation must be made by June 22, and sent to either of the undersigned. J. L. Crooks, B. M. Suber, Clerk. Chairman. Pomaria, S. C., R. F. D. No. 3. WASTED. ' Applications will be received for the position of teacher in Beth Ede? School, District No. 54. 'Term, eight months at a salary of $40 per moiiA. Send applications to either of the trustees, namely, J. C. Crape, T. B. Carlisle, T. H. Cromer, Newberry, S. C., R. F. D. TEACHER WANTED, Wanted, a teacher for Hartford school for a term of six or sevea months at a salary of $45.00 per month. Applications must be made by June 21. E. Lee Hayes, - * ?2 T T> J. r. aumuier, VifiC John H. Cousin, Trust9es. TEACHER WANTED. The undersigned trustees of Old Town school, District 40, township 7, ?Ill ?AAA|,Aa will rwcifC xui tca^u^l on or before the 15th day of June, 1912. School runs seven or eight months and salary $40 per month. H. T. Fellers, J. L. Fellers, W. H. Sanders, Silveretreet S. C.. Rout? 2. A Great Building Falls when its foundation is undermined, 9 and if the foundation of health?good digestion?is attacked, quick collapse follows. On the first signs of indigestion; Dr. King's New Life Pills should be taken to tone the stomach and regulate liver, kidneys and bowels. Pleasant, easy, safe and only 25 cents at W. E. Pelham's. DON'T BE AFKAID n I m Tl'TT k rn tTAr- xxr 1 VIM LAI TTHAI 1UI HAJI I . : Eat what you want when you want it and "Digestif Two or three tablets after meals digests all the food, prevents distress, relieves indigestion instantly. Brown's Digeslit is a little tablet easy to swallow, absolutely harmless. It has relieved thousande and is euaranteed to Dlease you. if not your money refunded?50c. COLUMBIA, SEWBEBRY & LAUBESS B. B. ? ' Schedule in effect June 4, 1912. Sub* x ,;i ject to change without notice. Schedules indicated are not guaranteed: APT, 52. 53. Lv. Charleston .. .. 6.00am 10.30pm Lv. Sumter /. 9.41am 6.55pm C., N. & L. Lv. Columbia 11.35am 4.55pm Lv. Prosperity 1.12am 3.34pm Lv. Newberry 1.29pm 3.20pm Lv. Clinton 2.30pm 2.35pm Lv. Laurens 2.52pm 2.05pm n jp, w p UU *?. V? ijm Ar. Greenville 4.00pm 12.2$p? Ar. Spartanburg. .. 4.05pm 12.20pm S. A. L. Ar. Abbeville 3.55pm 1.02pm Ar. Greenwood 3.27pm 1.33pm Ar. Athens 6.05pm 10.30am Ar. Atlanta 8.45pm 8.00am A. C. L. 54. 55. Lv. Columbia 5.00pm 11.15am Lv. Prosperity 6.26pm 9.50am Lv. Newberry 6.44pm 9.32am Lv. Clinton 7.35pm 8.44am Lv. Laurens 7.55pm 8.20am c. & w. c. Ar. Greenville 9.30pm 7.00am S. A. L. Ar. Greenville 2.28arn 2.38am Ar. Abbeville 2.56am 2.08am Ar. Athens 5.04am 11.59pm Ar. Atlanta. 7.15am 9.55pm Nos. 52 and 53 arrive and depart < from Union Station, Columbia, daily, and run through between Charleston and Greenville. Nos. 54 and 55 arrive and depart Gervais street, Columbia, daily except Sunday, and run through between Co iinnoia ana ureenvuie. W. J. Craig, P. T. M., Wilmington, N. C. i