University of South Carolina Libraries
CI Y PE ~/...... ...... 11 4 1 K q K- -1 2-3 .... .....07 k~. 'W 46 Endorsed by the Press DOROTHY DIX, the Famous Critic of Father' is more than a play-it is a ser the white race that must thrill the hear gratitude women who have only too oft grievous wrong" NORFOLK VIRGINIA-PILOT: 'Thc Father', scored a success.' NORFOLK LANDMARK: " 'The Sir a drama it is faultless." NORFOLK LEDGER-DISPATCH:" 'The Sins of the Father' thrilled a great RALEIGH NEWS AND OBSERVE1 drama-Dixon's masterpiece" RALEIC-H EVENING NEWS: "Dix Far superior to 'The Clansman.'-" REV. BENJAMIN FRANKLYN BR1 Richmond, Va , said: "It is a tremendor deserves the favor of an aopreciative pul Lower Floor, $1 FOR A NEW TRIALtis cigars,an tor to sen ARGDIENTS HEARD IN CASE coat and t AGAINST MI. A. CARLISLE. to the ju while one Arguments for New Trial in Case of at a fruit Former President of National After ti Bank of Newberry. stated the They were Greenville News, 26th. in refusin After hearing the arguments of the indictment attorneys for the defense and prosa- was not r cution, Judge Brawley yesterday af- he entered ternoon refused the motion for a new plea, no p trial in the case of Milton A. Carlisle soever wa who was recently convicted in the charge on United States District court on five Cochran a counts of an indictment alleging gen- been no< eral misapplication of the funds of on the pa the Newberry National bank, of which neys. Mr. he was president for a number of gument oI years. ~fourth gro Passing of sentence was postponed - been convi until this morning, at the request of 159 and 16 Mir. Dominick. the attorney for the 7 lyonly It defense, and with the acquiescer.o of were simil MIr. Cochran, the district attorney. It ed transac is probable that the sentence will be The defen passed when court convenes this the verdici morning. There are uncontradicted since it w2 rumors to the effect that the defense timony in will appeal the case after the sen- read. one< tence has been passed. the drafts The mo:icn for a new trial was to company. have been heard Monday afternoon, in this in< but at the request of the attorney had charg for the defensa. Mr. Dominick. it was another. continued until yesterday ar.dI Mr lisle with Dominick asked for a further contin-~ procured i uation for the motion. bu~t this was drafts whi refused. and the alrgPfments were gone "orthless, into. Before the grounds of the mo- Undertook tion were Tormally stated by Mr. Domn- "\I' no "O iniek. Mr. Adams. one of th3 deputies were good who had charge of the jury in the Cold Point trial of this case was sworn and ask- paid to th ed concernin.g the handling of the jury berry. Tli after they had been charged with~the by fraud 3 case. it being understood that this $300G frcm was to ha one of the grounds for the prove that motion for a new trial. and no~ t Mr. Adams' testimony was to the ef- positive pr feet that when the jury had hoon that Mr. C che' with ihn en'so. on the after- flil ( I' roon of last Wrdner:Tny. thWyha proof that ARA USE, E X". II: X ZII the Pulpit andl thie Public The New York Journal, said: 'TheSins of the non: a clarion call to maintain the puritv of t of every man who listens to it, and1 fill with Sn been patient and pitiful sufferers undier a mas Dixon'i new pley, 'The Sins of the s of the Father' pleases large audiences. As ] rhomas Dixon's play proves a big success. - madience. Author is given an ovation." :"'The Sins of the Father' is a powerful mn's latest play meets with great success. AN, Pastor of the Emanuel Baptist Church, s drama and points a good moral use that >lic."' .50 and $1.00. Baic es in the lobby of the hotel, teec re h e surveillance of the depu-MrDonckrg one member bought some ol ifrnei I another asked the proprie-thtihewsaq d to 'his room for an over-ovrafsheou wo towels. On the way back git fteeda ry room, the jury stopped teewsn se member bought some fruittenthmadb stand. I eadt h is testimony Mr. Dominick teWladtas grounds for his motion.ncksaethtt first, the error of the courtietinyo h' g the motion to quash theevrastlmn .Second, the indictment lseadM.Wla ead to the deefndant before teffhgon his plea. Third, after theanetrlwsc art of the indictment what- o h ititat s read to the jury as arenbfoeteu the trial of the case. Mr. terl ftecu tated here that there had cmetuo h >bjection to this procedure fnatde o a rt of the defendant's attor- dsrc tony Dominick after slight ar-Doickhastt this po.int, stated as hisths edas und that the defendant had wteshdbe cted of counts 152, 153, andfestodprv 0, and that there were real-Cchn ttder o charges. The first threeththedfneh ar, and the last two involv-nessadthtc tions of the same nature. fnehdntojc ce took the position that Togonso should not be supported,baeon atrsr s notsuipoted b thetes hefst wlags thea the case. ~ Mr. Dominchateopuni trg ftecutnrgr onl to osdeifrence,i Mr. Domnick sttedtth t i f the deputies licmen te gvermet M. overdrafts, hu ~ oneoffens andguilty f o the se -dra thehhre .Ca ee as mude cset havig cshe orhavigJburecn tem wherel o be cahed t he ba n hregard t her thte llgdt e Willartroo tansa to pove hat he daftsi ckfstable, that te ortles. bt he ccontsI ete a sebytlement and aterwadspadtoisbein aedr thla Grante cmpay, ad nt he fith ground if<e e Natonal ank o New n oew tria outsid i. inditmen aiged hat nurn hefoether ju 'ebn,adatmtd to he rueothe groud thesacount wee g o mmt te jupon was ores hr a ofendanrs does no ta.r ~of. stated Mr. Dominick, h adonat rU~1 comuittd a rm- och:rane sate n hre tha te efno e he the moeys. f coc nesses,~' affdathat cc f o supote by' thes h- jirst ws ha * ~ ~ ~ .. ..... .'.. I 1,c the' cae Mr Dominick ~h~t~s alee fthe coun-~ ts inoreard to inritc wsas Mr. '~ D m ~istte that ~ 'dtat o0 beo cased at the bank ek n tate Xhte.algd ob "~~~~~~ an%ntesaebet Grte company and nthe u'Ni Te Ntiorak ofal New-'heinfh tee r nictmnh lled t ,a ( ilwt masDixn?neplev,'Ted Sit, acordn -to s oftheFater'plesesla e ofdi tes deute Ludenc. Atho isgi Mr.a Domiinic nh ',: " IT he Siharg of the jahrsapwrury )n 9s ltes pla mets it breing staedtha SNEBERRY, FRI Sweeping T~ Like a to see ti >een disappointed in their nent therefore requests tha nediately with the managei Direction of THE SC GEORGE H. I ony, 75c. and 50c. ras acquitted, and criminal intent. ed that there was Mr. Cochran next made his .bookkeeping, and ment against the new trial, an( iitted of the other up the grounds put forward bn I not have been Dominick one by one. The ts, in intent, since "worthless" he stated, in the tial difference be- counts, was not used in the sei e overdrafts, a fictitious piece of paper, or th other two counts, party did not have any mone ctions, Mr. Domi- that they were worthless in tha iere had been no did not produce any money, in -that there was of which worthlessness, the test between Mr. Car- was that they were not paid. .word was also used to aid the a ir the motion for tion in the count of defraudin yrtain "oriticisms" banik. The books also, showed rney in his argu- Mr. Carlisle got the money in ry in violation of hard cash" for these drafts, anc that no one shall it was a separate matter from fact that the de- overdrawn account of the ga Ce the stand. The company at the bank. ncording to Mr. -The Willard transaction, Mr. ad in speaking of ran stated, had been fa.irly subi that not a single to the jury and argued by col ffered by the de- The question was put up to thenr the charge. Mr. ,they had decided it, and couk -that he had said Jhave done otherwise. The s d put up no wit- Itransaction was of a different n~ unsel for the de- This had been completely thr ed at the time. before the jury, and the cotto the motion were ceipt in Mr. Carlisle's own hand lating to the jury. ing~ showed that it was intende the jurymnen had the bank. to be accessible In regard to the claimed coir if they had want- by himself upon the fact that Mr. the testimony of lisle did not take the stand, Mr. ( ,as given above, ran stated as a rule of the court s connection read erally, that objection to what is .he State against by the district attorney must be: tried in Spartan- at the time. His statement, how the bailiffs in jhe stated, did not necessarily in had been in the 1Mr. Carlisle. chi the jury had In regard to the member of re it was more jury who was a non-resident, 'dict having been Cochran stated that this objectior ~e on this ground, come.too late, and said that the ~he verdict should list for this case had been in ury had been ex- hands of the attorneys for the fluences, without fense for six months. and they his influence had the opportunity of finding out all desired about the jurors. Bot: in connection this, and in the other point, thi that one of the the handling of the jury by the c >ck, was a direc- ties after being charged with the nk, and was fur- IMr. Cochran read a number of 41 ent of this State. tions from' eases both in the hi gin H{end'erson- and the lower courts. to show ing read to tha' th dp ision in the Ro-nn enee had .it was stated c nsidtornhlv modifitnd, and that offences were henfm'c a no frin should ho ord: broneht in. it 5..- Afte'r tha arguments had been e was no willful on the testimony taken in the< DAYOC lirough th Wh iriwir E SI =BY ount of the enormoi iis great play many t] ifforts to secure seat t you place your orde rof the theatre in yoi 'UTHERN AMU! 3RENNAN, MANAG Seats on Sale Mo the court sustained the verdict of argu- jury upon those counts upon w: [ took the defendant had been found gu y Mr. and in regard to the contention of word influence upon the jury after hb drayft charged with the case, the court ise of of the opinion that the facts did it the sustain this contention. The ma y but for the new trial~ was therefore re they ed. proof Judge Brawley asked if the def4 mony ant was ready to receive the sente This and Mr. Dominick requg6ted that lega- be postponed until the next morn g the and this being agreed to by Mr. C< that ran, on account of certain arrar "cold ments which the defense wished t that make, the request was granted the Judge Brawley. It is probablei 'anite this sentence will be imposed morning immediately upon the ( Coch-- venling of the court at 10 o'clock. aitted Saved From the Grave. msel. "I had about given up hope, a: , and nearly four years of suffering froI Inot sever lung trouble," writes Mrs. M ~cond Dix, of Clarksville, Tenn. "Often pain in my chest would be almost tture. bearable and I could not do ~shed work, bu: Dr. King's New Discov 2 re- has made me feel like a new pers writy. Its the best medicine made for iorthroat and lungs." Obstinate cous :frstubborn colds, hay fever, la grii asthma, croup, bronchitis and hen ment rhages, hoarseness and whoop Car.. cough, yield quickly to this wond ful medicine. Try it. 50c and o-Trial bot:les free. Guaranteed by gen- E. Pelham. said nade UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ever, DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA 3ude hIn the U. S. District Court. FIn the matter of G. M. B. Epti the Bankrupt. Mr. B~y virtue of an order passed had Joan J. Earle, Esq., referee in ba. jury ruptcy, dated July 8, 1910, I will the the following described real estate de- Newberry Court House, in the Coi had ty of Newberry, District aforesaid, they salesday (the 7th) in November, 19 a in between the hours of 11 o'clock tt of the forenoon and 3 o'clock in the a epu- ernoon, at public auction, to the I: ease, and highest bidder, free of all lie iota- and encumbrances, upon the followi -brterms, to-wit: For one-third (1 that cash and the balance in twelve (] ha!nnonths from day of sale, with lea thn to the purchaser to anticipate 1 S-crt-dit poCrtionl in whole or in pal t he credit portion to be secured tion hond of the purchaser. payable twel sor1. 2 months from the day of sale, wi cn-interest from date and until paid n.fulU at the rate of 7 per cent. per a DER28 'e South is crowds surging heatregoers have s. The manage r for tickets im ir city. SEMENT CO. ER. nday, Oct. 24. ~'Money to Loan at 50 the To the Rich or Poor. was From one hundred to thousands not of dollars,- on long time and easy ti'on payments at 5 per cent interest. fus- JcsnLa n rs o OLL- E . I. . SMiIH, Local AgentS. 'ce Office at 932 Main St., Newberry, S. C. ing, >Ch- mortgage of the premises purchased, ige- which mortgage shall provide for in to surance on the buildings on the town by lots and an assignment of the policy hat of insurance to said undersigned as this said trustee and as collateral secur ~on- ity, and shall also contain a. clause providing for 10 per cent. attorney's fees in case of collection by suit or an attorney. The purchasers to pay ter all costs of drawing deeds and mort .L. gages and for recording the mort the gages; to wit: unl 1. That certain lot of land in the eyTown of Newberry, County of New on. berry, State of South Carolina, con the tainin g one and one-fourth acres, ~hs, fronting on Glenn street and other r'wise bounded by lots of E. B. Wilbur,. ing J. B.O'Neall Holloway and W. W. er- Hornsby. 2. That certain lot of land in the w.Town of Newberry, County of New berry and State of South Carolina. with a cemenit block livery .stables building thereon, front mg 60 feet on Friend street other ng, wise bounded by lots of Harriet Y. Lane, Levi Green and others. by 3. These two certain lots of land ik- in the Town of Newberry, State of~ ell South Carolina, with two cement block at store buildings thereon each fronting ml- twenty-two (22 1-2) and one-half feet On on Main street and otherwise buond 30, ed by lots of Summer B3ros, Levi Green inl and others. ft- 4. That certain tract of land in the ist County of Newberry, and State of ~ns South Carolina, containing one hun ng dred thirty-three and three-fourhts -3) acres, bounded by lands of T. A. Wil .2) lhams, C. T. Paysinger, H. W. Whit .e aker, J. H. Dennis and estate of G. G. he DeWalt. 7t; 5. Also.that lot fronting 24 feet on by Friend street with a two story wood ye en building thereon, and bounded by th lots of Harrell Y. Love, Levi Green in and others. n- Lambert W. Jones,