Yorkville enquirer. [volume] (Yorkville, S.C.) 1855-2006, December 04, 1901, Image 1
=
^ ^ ^ ^ ISSUED S1MI<WEEEL^
l. m. grist & sons, Publishers. 1 % ifamtlij Uetragager: 40r <&* fromstion of the political, Social, g.gricul(ural, and Commercial Interests of the |eogte. ^JT^mnom'oopy1! nra cramSCE'
ESTABLISHED 1855. YORKVILLE, S. C., WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 19Q1. ISTO. 97.7
THE COURIER
BY JHXjEI
CHAPTER XII.
next day, the ICth of
| ^ | I August, the loud tongued
J trumpetssounded through
the camp. The Tartar soldlers
sprang at once to
Ivan Ogareff, after having
quitted Zabedelro, arrived, accompanied
by a numerous staff of Tartar
officers. His face was more serious
than usual, and his contracted outlines
Indicated a great anger, which was only
waiting for some object on which to
hurl itself.
Michael Strogoflf, lost in a group of
prisoners, saw this man pass by. He
had a presentiment that a great calamity
was about to happen, for Ivan Ogareff
now knew that Marfa Strogoflf was
the mother of Michael Strogoflf. captain
In .the corps of the couriers of the czar.
Ivan Ogareff arrived at the center of
the camp, dismounted from his horse,
and the horsemen of bis escort formed
a large circle around him.
At that moment Sangarre approachel
and said:
"I have nothing new of which to inform
you. Ivan,"
Ivan Ogareff answered only in giving
a short command to one of bis officers.
Immediately the ranks of the prisoners
were traversed in a brutal manner by
the soldiers. These unfortunate ones,
ureed on with blows and pushed with
the wood of the lances, quickly arranged
themselves along the outer edge of
the camp. Four lines of Infantry and
cavalry drawn up at the back rendered
all escape impossible.
Order for silence was at once given,
and at a sign from Ivan Ogareff Sangarre
directed her steps toward the
group in the middle of which was Marfa
StrogoCf.
The old Siberian saw her coming.
She understood what was about to happen.
A disdainful smile played on her
lips. Then, turning to Nadia, she said
to her in a low voice:
"You do not know me any longer, my
daughter. Whatever happens and however
trying may be this examination,
not a word, not a gesture. It is for
him, not for me, they search."
At this moment Sangarre, after hav,..lng
looked around for an instant, placed
her hand upon the shoulder of the old
Siberian.
"What do you wish from me?" said
Marfa Strogoff.
"Come," answered Sangarre.
And. pushing her with her hand, she
led her into the middle of the reserved
space before Ivan Ogareff.
Michael Strogoff kept his eyelashes
half closed In order that the brightness
of his eyes should not betray him.
Marfa Strogoff, having come in front
of Ivan Ogareff, straightened her person,
crossed her arms and waited.
"Are you Indeed Marfa Strogoff?" demanded
Ivan Ogareff.
"Yes," answered the old Siberian,
with calmness.
"Have you changed your mind as regards
the statement you made to me
when, three days ago. I interrogated
you at Omsk?"
"No."
"So you are ignorant 01 me mci mm
your son, Michael Strogoff, courier of
the czar, has passed through Omsk?"
"I am ignorant of it."
"And that the man that you believed
to have recognized as your son at the
posthouse was not he?was not your
son?"
"He was not my son."
"And have you not seen him since
among the prisoners?"
"Anlt^-ae were shown to you would
you recognize him?"
"No."
At this answer, which showed an inflexible
determination to avow nothing,
a murmur of approbation arose from
the crowd.
Ivan Ogareff could not restrain a
menacing gesture.
"Listen," said he to Marfa Strogoff.
"Your son is here, and you go at once
to point him out."
"No."
"All these men, taken at Omsk and at
Kalyvan, are going to defile before
your eyes, and if you do not poiut out
Michael Strogoff you shall receive as
many blows of the knout as there shall
be men who have passed before you."
Ivan Ogareff had now realized that.
irliotnvor thfnotc Im mifltht iittor fl twl to
whatever tortures lie might subject her,
the indomitable Siberian would not
speak. To discover the courier of the
czar he now counted not upon her, but
upon Michael Strogoff himself. lie did
not believe it possible that when the
mother and the son should be brought
into the presence of each other an irresistible
impulse would uot betray theui.
Certainly if he had ouly wished to
gaiu possession of the imperial letter
he could simply have given orders for
all these prisoners to be searched. But
Michael Strogoff might have destroyed
this letter after learning its contents,
and if he were uot recognized and ho
should gaiu Irkutsk the plans of Ivan
Ogareff would be all frustrated. Wherefore
it was uot ouly the letter which lie
must have from the traitor; he must
have the bearer of It..
Xadia at length understood nil. and
she now knew who was Michael Strogoff
and why he had wished to traverse.
without Ileitis known, the invaded
provinces of Siberia.
On the order of Ivan Ogareff the prisoners
passed oue by one before Marfa
Strogoff. who remained immovable as
a statue and whose regard expressed
only the most complete indifference.
Her son was in the last ranks. When
In his turn he Dassed before his moth
OF THE CZAR.
9 VERNE.
er, Nadla shut her eyes in order not to
see bim.
Miehnel Strogoff bad remained apparently
Impassible, but his bands were
bleeding from the pressure of the fetters.
Ivan Ogareff was conquered by the
son and the mother.
Saugarre, placed near him, only said
one word?"Knout!"
"Yes." cried Ivan Ogareff, "let this
old jade have the knout and let the
punishment continue until she die!"
A Tartar soldier, carrying that terrible
instrument of torture, approached
Marfa Strogoff.
The knout Is composed of a certain
number of leather thongs, to the ends
of which are attached twisted Iron wire.
One can easily understand that to be
eondetnued to receive a hundred aud
twenty blows from such a whip is the
same thing as to be condemned to
death. Marfa Strogoff knew It, but
she also knew that no torture upon
earth could make her speak, and she
had already offered the sacrifice of her
life for her son's safety.
Marfa Strogoff, having been seized by
two soldiers, was thrown on her knees
'L- 1 VT 1
i?u tue ?ruuuu. nt*r ruue, uuviug uccu
torn, exposed her naked back. A saber
was fixed before her breast at the distance
of only a few inches, and in case
she should bend under the pain her
breast would be pierced with the sharp
point.
The Tartar raised the lash.
He was waiting.
Go on!" said Ivan Ogareff.
The whip hissed in the air, but before
the blow had fallen a powerful hand
had wrenched it from the hands of the
Tartar.
Michael Strogoff was there! He had
leaped before this horrible scene! If
at the posthouse of Ichlm he had restrained
himself at the blow from Ivan
OgarefT, here before his mother, who
was about to be struck, he was not able
to master himself.
Ivan Ogareff had succeeded.
"Michael Strogoff!" he cried.
Then, advancing, he said:
"Ah, was this done by the man of
Ichlm?"
"Himself!" said Michael Strogoff, and,
raising the knout, be tore with It the
face of Ivan Ogareff himself.
"Blow for blow!"
"Well given!" cried the voice of a
spectator, who fortunately hid himself
in the tumult.
Twenty soldiers threw themselves on
Michael Strogoff. and they were about
to kill him. But Ivan Ogareff, from
whom a cry of pain and rage had escaped.
stopped them with a motion of
bis hand.
"This man is reserved for the Justice
of the emir!"
The letter to the Imperial armies was
found in the breast of Michael Strogoff,
who bad not had time to destroy It, and
it was banded over to Ivan Ogareff.
The spectator who had uttered aloud
those words "well given" was no other
than Alcide Jolivet. His companion
and himself, having halted at the camp
of Zabedeiro, were present at this
cene.
"My God," said he to Harry Blount,
"inese people ui iue uunu uic iuu^u
men! Do we not owe some return to
our companion of the journey? May
Korpanoff or Strogoff succeed! What
splendid revenge for the affair of
Ichim!"
"Yes, revenge indeed." said Harry
Blount. "But Strogoff is a dead man.
for his sake it would perhaps be better
not to remember him any longer."
"And allow his mother to perish under
the kuout?"
"Do you believe that he has acted
better by his rash haste than his mother
and his sister?"
"I don't believeanytbing; 1 know nothing,"
answered Alcide Jolivet. "only
had 1 been in his place I should uot
have acted otherwise. What a slash!
Eh, what?the devil, we must boil over
sometimes. God would have placed
water iu our veins and uot blood had
he wished us to remain always aud everywhere
imperturbable."
"What a splendid incident for a newspaper
article!" said Harry Blouut. "If
Ivan Ogareff would only comuniuieate
to us the coutents of that letter!"
Ivan Ogareff, after having wiped off
the blood which covered his face, had
broken the seal of the letter. lie read
it again and again for a long time, as
if he wished to fathom its contents.
Then, haviug given his orders that
Michael Strogoff. strongly fettered,
should be sent on to Tomsk with the
other prisoners, he took command of
the troops encamped at Zabedeiro, uud
amid the deafening souuds of drums
and trumpets he mar-lied to the town
where the eiuir was awaiting hint.
They had not long to wait for the
lieutenant of Feofar. Resounding bugles
announced his arrival.
Ivan Ogareff?the Hashed, as they ulromlv
bi??riin to call him?dressed this
time in the uniform of a Tartar officer,
arrived on horseback before the tent
of the etnir. lie was accompauied by
a body of tiie soldiers from the camp
of Zabedeiro, who drew up along the
sides of the plateau, in the middle of
which he remained only during the
time allotted to the amusements. One
could see a deep gash cutting obliquely
the face of the traitor.
Ivan Ogareff presented to the emir
his principal officers, and Feofar-Khan,
without departing from the coldness
which was the main foundation of his
dignity, received them in a manner
which made them satisfied with their
reception.
Alcide J olivet and Ilarry Blount then
joined the crowd and looked on in such
a manner as uot to lose any detail of a
feast, which was to furnish a hundred
good lines for the newspapers. They
gazed with astonishment on FeofarKhan
in his magnificence, his women,
his officers, his guards and all this oriental
pomp, of which the ceremonies
of Europe can give no Idea. But they
turned away with disdain when Ivan
OgarefT presented himself before the
emir, and they waited, not without
some Impatience, for the feast to begin.
"Do you see, my dear Bloont," said
Aleide JolJvet, "we are come too soon,
like good citizens who must needs come
or lose their money. All this is only
the rising of the curtain. It would
Dave Deen Deuer lasie iu uuve umcu
only for the ballet"
"What ballet?" asked Harry Blount
"The obligatory ballet faith. But 1
think the curtain is about to rise."
AJcide Jolivet spoke as if be were at
the opera, and, taking his glass from
Its case, he prepared to have a look at.
as a connoisseur, the first subjects of
Feofar's troop.
But a tedious ceremony was to precede
the amusements.
Meanwhile most of the prisoners had
passed before the emir, and in passing
each of them had to prostrate the forehead
to touch the very dust as a sign
of servility. It was the slavery which
commenced with humiliation. When
the unfortunates were too slow In bending,
the rude hand of the guards cast
them violently to the earth. Alcide
Jolivet and his companion could not
assist at such a spectacle without feeling
the greatest indignation.
"This Is cowardly! Let us go away!"
said Alcide Jolivet.
"No." replied Harry Blount; "we
must see all."
"See all! Ah!" cried Alcide Jolivet
?>wKl/vnln ?Al?ln? tKo arm nf hta nnm.
DUUUCUlJi DCiAIUf, KUM v. u.w
panloD.
"What Is the matter with you?" asked
the former.
"Look! Blount, It Is she!"
"She?"
"The sister of our fellow traveler.
Alone and a prisoner! We must save
her!"
"Restrain yourself." coldly replied
Harry Blount. "Our Intervention In
behalf of this youug girl would be more
hurtful than useful to her."
Alcide Jolivet. ready to rush forward,
stopped himself, and Nadia. who had
not perceived them, beiug half veiled
by her hair, passed in her turn before
the emir, without attracting his attention.
In the meantime, after Nadia. Marfa
Strogoff had arrived, and as she did
not throw herself quickly enough Into
the du$t the guards brutally pushed
her.
Marfa Strogoff fell.
Her son made a terrible movement,
which the soldiers who were guarding
him could with difficulty master.
But old Marfa raised herself, and
they were about to drag her when Ivan
Ogareff Intervened, saying:
"Let this woman remain."
As for Nadia. she was thrown back
among the crowd of prisoners. The
took of Ivan Ogareff bad not fixed Itself
upon her.
Michael Strogoff was then led before
the emir, and there be remained erect,
without lowering his eyes.
"Your face to the ground!" Ivan Ogareff
cried out to him.
"No!" replied Michael Strogoff. Two
guards wished to force him to bend,
but it was they who were thrown to
the ground by the hand of the robust
young man.
Ivan Ogareff advanced toward Michael
Strogoff.
"You are about to die," said he.
"I shall die," fiercely answered Michael
Strogoff, "but your face of traitor,
Ivan, will not the less bear and forever
the infamous mark of the knout!"
Ivan Ogareff at this answer became
horribly pale.
la ?Kio nrloAnnr^" Homnnripfl
1? UU to luto pi iavu\.t ? ? ? ? ?
the emir In a voice the more menacing
because of its calmness.
"A Russian spy," answered Ivan Ogareff.
In making out Michael Strogoff a spy
he knew the sentence pronounced
against him would be the more terrible.
Michael Strogoff moved toward Ivan
Ogareff.
The soldiers stopped him.
The emir then made a gesture before
which fhe whole crowd bent their
heads. Afterward he motioned with
his hand for the Koran, which was
brought to him. He opened the book
and placed bis finger on one of the
pages.
It was chance, or, rather, as these
orientals think, God himself, who was
about to decide the fate of Michael
Strogoff. The people of central Asia
give the name of "fal" to this practice.
After having interpreted the sense of
the verse touched by the finger of the
Judge they apply the sentence, whatever
it may be.
The emir had left his finger resting
on the page of the Koran. The chief
of the ulemas, then approaching, read
with a loud voice ft verse which finished
with these words:
"And he shall see no more the things
of the earth." "Russian spy." said
Feofar-Khan, "you came to see what
Is passing In the camp of the Tartars!
Look, then, with all your eyes! Look!"
TO DE CONTINUED.
? The fight between the Liberal and
Conserative armies of Colombia that
had been going on around Colon, Isthmus
of Panama, for about two
weeks, came to an end last Thursday
upon the defeat of the Liberals by the
government forces. The Liberals had
possession of the town of Colon and it
looked as if they were in a position to
hold it, when the Conseratives surprised
them by bringing a large force
to an unexpected point by cutting a
passage through the thick forests that
had been looked upon as a protection.
During the fight, trains were operated
regularly across the isthmus between
the Atlantic and Pacific, under guard
of United States marines. Neither side
attempted to molest these trains as
they both realized the conseouences of
complications with the United States
government.
pijfttlattwus ^tading.
TRIAL OF CLAIB HERBERT.
A Remarkable Scene In a Texas ,
Conrt of Justice.
General George F. Alford, of Dallas,
Texas, has told many good stories to i
the press, but the following Is among i
his very best He says It Is not orlgl- j
nal, but his friends who know his pe- ]
culiar felicitous style will not believe
It. The general \s one of the oldest i
residents and besti known men in Tex- ;
as?a scholar, poel statesman and pa- <
trlot. i
The name of Jones Rivers awakens
in the minds of many of the older res- (
idents of Texas, and especially of the ,
older members or the bar, memories or
the wit, orator and lawyer who played
so conspicuous a part for many years
In the courts of Texas, and more particularly
In the counties contiguous to
the Brazos and Colorado rivers, thirty
or forty years ago. Bright, Joyous and
witty, even the approach of death
could not conquer or repress his natural
exuberance of Bplrlt; for when, on
a cold, dismal evening In November,
In the then dreary hamlet of Georgetown,
now a prosperous city, he was
told that his hour had come, he met
the relentless messenger with a smile,
Jested in his very face, and, with a >
witticism upon his lips, passed into the {
land of shadows. s
He was genial In manner, eloquent 1
in speech, forcible in argument and ,
strong In everything save the power to j
resist the seductive influences of the ,
Intoxicating cup. He possessed in an (
eminent degree the "divine afflatus" j
that belongs as trutly to the natural }
orator as to the true poet; and when |
enlisted in a cause that aroused his t
sympathies, or when he felt the stimu- ,
lating influence of the wine cup, he j
could, with dramatic skill, touch the (
hearts of his hearers, and by the mes- ]
meric fervor of his matchless eloquence (
stir their deepest emotions. This ir- ,
resistible power was never more sig- ,
nally displayed than in the defense of J
his friend, Colonel C. C. Herbert,, fa- i
miliarly known as "Claib Herbert" in ]
the district court of Colorado county,
more than a third of a century ago.
Claib Herbert was a superb type of
a Southern planter under the old regime.
Born in Virginia, reared in the
fertile fields and genial climate of Texas,
with a big heart in a brawny, muscular
body, he was hospitable, liberal,
generous, brave and sympathetic. He
lived on his beautiful plantation on the
banks of the charming Colorado, just
below the town fit Columbus. A man <
of learning and influence, he served as
a representative in the Texan legislature
and the Confederate congress,
and held a commission as colonel in
the southern army. The family was a
distinguished one in the annals of Virginia,
of Texas and California; his
brother, Colonel Phil Herbert, having
been a member of the national congress
from the last named state before
the late war between the states, and
was killed gallantly leading his regiment
of Texas cavalry in desperate assault
upon Fort Butler.
As Claib Herbet sat one day at his
table, with a number of guests, the
meal was interrupted by the appearance
at the door of a little boy, perhaps
8 years of age, an orphan, who
lived with a neighbor named Howard
in the relation of a ward or apprentice.
The child was crying bitterly,
trembling, and seemingly frightened
and suffering. Herbert questioned him
and the boy said between his sobs that
Howard had beaten him unmercifully
and without cause. Herbert carried
him Into an adjoining room, examined
him, and found his body cruelly striped
and bearing other evidence of severe
punishment. The kind planter soothed
him, and, seating him at the table,
assured him of protection, and endeavored
to quiet his fear that Howard
would pursue and carry him back.
This Howard was a Yankee, of the
Mayflower type, a representative Purltan,
Pharisaical In pretentions, sanctimonious
In manner, solemn In visage,
with a drawling, nasal mode of speech,
and a countenance that was a perpetual
Interrogation point. Of a cruel nature,
he was destitute of bowels of
compassion, having apparently but one
bowel, and this seemingly Illustrated
the maxim of geometry which affirms
that the shortest distance between two
points is a straight line.
The boy's fear of pursuit was not
without cause. Hardly was the dinner
finished when Howard rode up to the
gate and called for Colonel Herbert,
who responded with promptness. Howard
inquired whether he had seen the
boy, adding that it had been necessary
to chastise him severely that morning,
and that afterward he had ran away,
and he had traced his bare feet coming
in that direction. Herbert made no reply,
but walked quietly out through the
open gate?seized Howard as he sat '
on ms nor.se, puueu mm uu, aim ga< c
him then and there and unmerciful
flogging:, saying as he released him:
"That will teach you not to beat another
child, you infernal scoundrel!'
Howard remounted his horse and
rode away without Indulging in any
remarks.
The district court was then sitting
in Columbus, the seat of justice in
Colorado county. Howard proceeded
by the most direct road to that place,
and appeared without delay before the
grand jury, who promptly brought in a
bill of indictment against Herbert for
i aggravated assault .and battery.
Jones Rivers, as counsel for the defendant,
demanded an immediate trial.
: Colonel Edward Waller was district attorney,
for whom Waller county, Texas,
was named as a memorial. The
only witness for the state was Howi
ard, who told his story, was rigorous|
ly cross-examined, and the prosecu!
tion rested their case. 1
Jones Rivers stood up. "If the court
please," he said, 'the defendant In this
case has no evidence to offer, excepting
the feeble child that has been beaten
by the prosecuting witness."
Here he led the little boy forward
and seated him at his side, in front of
the jury. The boy was even smaller
than his years, of delicate physique,
and showed in his pinched face and
3cant clothes traces of suffering and
privation?the look of neglected orphanflood
in poverty.
The case was closed. Counsel for the
state said, that in submitting it to the
lury he had only to say that as there
was no defense, the Jury could do
aothlng but return a verdict of guilty.
Rivers knew that every technical rule
)f law was against his client, and that
there was no legal defense to the
state's case; but at the same time he
tnew every man on that Jury, and all
their domestic relations. He knew that
the oldest juryman, the foreman, had
narried late in life and had two chiliren,
twin boys, just the age of the
ittle orphan, to whom he was passionately
devoted. He knew, too, that
le had been a fellow soldier in the rev>lutionary
army of Texas, with the
father of the boy that had been the
/Ictim of Howard's brutality. Making
10 preliminary reference to these facts,
lowever, Rivers said:
"Gentlemen of the jury, the state of
Texas has presented her evidence and
stated her case, and I rise now to
speak for the defendant, Claib Heraert,
your fellow citizen, and your
leighbor, your friend and mine, and
:he friend of all who need a friend, and
ipon whose ears the orphan's cry nev?r
falls in vain. The only evidence I
lave to offer on his behalf is the pale
face, the tearful eye, and the frail,
aruised form of the little orphan that
sits at my side, of the child whose he oic
father shared with some of you
n Clays now gone, me narusiuya ui mc
:amp and the dangers of the battle.
He was at San Jacinto when the star
)f the young republic rose triumphant
ibove that historic field, and with him,
fou Mr. Foreman, participated In the
mdying glories of that eventful day.
\nd when peace came you began, side
jy side, as neighbors and friends the
mttle of hardships and poverty, in the
lew land that you had aided In rescung
from the hands of the spoiler.
That battle you have fought well, Mr.
Foreman, and are still spared to your
jrateful country; but your old comrade
las been gathered to his fathers. He
narrled late in life and accumulated
iut a scant store of this world's goods,
ind this child, the only fruit of the
narriage, was, In the providence of
3od, left a penniless orphan, and what
late befell him you know full well.
For aught I know, Mr. Foreman, you
nay have now, when old, little ones
:hat are as dear to you as was this
joor child to that aged father who
deeps his last long sleep in the soil
le periled his life to defend.
As Rivers proceeded, he drew near to
:he jury, and spoke In soft, but earn;st
tones, while an occasional tear
itole down the cheeks of the old forenan.
Rivers saw this, and continued.
"Time Is fast weaving threads of silver
among your dark locks; your feet
ire pressing the brink of the river that
lows between this and the unknown
and, and soon, leaving perhaps to
four little ones an inheritance of poverty,
as did the father of this child to
llm, you must go to Join your silent
:omrade on the other side of the dark,
:old river, and then perchance these
lear little ones may be consigned like
four comrade's boy, to the tender mer '
Unnrar^ Thon tVlP
;itra ui aumc uiuiai iiunatu. * ..v.. ....
lttle arms that so often encircled your
leek In the loving emurace may be
aised to shield the tender forms which
fou now clasp lovingly to your bosom,
igainst the blows such as fell so cruely
on this poor little orphan. Then
nay the dimpled cheeks that now glow
vith the rosy hue of health, be sunken
ind pale from neglect and want; the
;yes that now brighten at your comng,
may be red with weeping and the
jentle voices that fall like sweetest
nusic on your eager ears, be heard
heading In pathetic, beseeching tones
'or mercy, as the voice of this child
fell on the unheeding ear of the prosicutlng
witness; and then perchance
!?od in his infinite mercy may raise
jp for those little ones a friend and
in avenger as He raised up Clalb Heraert
to avenge the wrongs of this defenseless
orphan, and perhaps that
friend may be, as Claib Herbert is this
lay, charged as a criminal, and if so,
Mr. Foreman, would you have him
punished?"
As the last words were uttered, Rivers
was so near the old foreman that
ie could lay his hand on his head, and
ipparently spoke to him alone. The
climax was reached; human nature
could stand no more. The old foreman
rose from his chair trembling in every
nerve, and raising his clenched hands
ibove his head, in a voice quivering
tvith emotion, cried:
"No! no by the eternal, no!" and
Iropping into his seat, with his face in
his hands, sobbed aloud; and judge,
counsel and bystanders mingled their
tears with his.
Rivers at once sat down, and the district
attorney arose to make a concluding
argument for the state, but before
he had concluded the opening sentence,
the old foreman, with streaming
eyes and with a tremulous voice, said:
"Edwin Waller! sit down! You are
?3 or?/1 Q rrnA/1 1 a itrvpr Hi 1 f
1 guuu man auu a ...
sit down! We don't want to hear you
talk another word!"
Waller sat down, and the judge simply
read the statute defining the offense
and fixing the penalty, and directed
the jury to retire and consider
t>f their verdict. Whereupon the old
foreman rose and, without any consultation
whatever of his co-jurors, said:
"Not guilty, your honor; not guilty!"
"So say you all, gentlemen?" asked
the court.
"So say we all!" responded the en
tire Jury, and the verdict having beer
properly reduced to writing and slgnec
the jury were discharged.
Thus the trial of Clalb Howard was
ended, and thus the most remarkabU
scene ever witnessed In a Texas court
of Justice closed.?Chicago Law Journal.
ORIGIN OF THE NEGRO.
The Scripture* Are Searched For
LlRht on the Qneatlon.
The following interesting article on
the origin of the NegrO, from the pen
of Rev. Dr. J. B. Mack, of Fort Mill, Is
reproduced from the Charlotte Observer,
of last Sunday:
Whence the Negro? This Is a dark
otiVv4a/if on nornlovtna
OUUJCb I., C%1* VAVVVUlllgljr pvi pivniHQ
problem. Yet Its solution Is vital to
some doctrines of the church, and also
vital In determining the nature of our
national government. Indeed If we
think of the strange Introduction of
Negro slavery Into our land and Its peculiar
phases In colonial days; If we
notice how It colored almost every
question In congress from 1789 to 1861;
If we study the causes of our great
civil war; If we consider how this matter
has made the south almost solidly
Democratic and the north almost solidly
Republican from 1868 to 1900, we
must conclude that this problem has
been the main pivot of our national
differences and doings. This being the
case, It is clear that God's Providence
intends for our nation to solve this
problem. As the Lord made Esther to
be Queen of Persia for a special purpose,
so He has made our country to
be a queen among the nations of this
world for a wonderful work, viz.: The
determining of the relations of the various
races to each other, and especially
the relation of the white man to the
Negro. Hence we have in our land all
of the four races: the white man of
Europe, the red men of America, the
yellow man of Asia and the black man
of Africa.
The position of the Negro has ever
been very varied and always peculiar.
Some have regarded him as a beast,
others as an inferior race of mankind,
and others as the image of God cut In
ebony as the white man is that image
cut in ivory. Today in some states the
Negro can vote, hold office and inter
marry with the whites, in otner spates
he can vote and hold office, but the
line is drawn at marriage. In other
states he is voted (sometimes even after
he is dead) but cannot ride in the
same car or eat at the same table with
white folks; while in some others even
the right of voting is virtually denied
him.
Now is it right to make these distinctions?
Is it right to debar the Negro
from voting and from holding office, if
he is intelligent? Is it right to forbid
his eating and drinking and marrying
with white folks anj?where, provided
the whites are willing? The answer to
these questions depends on the answer
to the question "Whence the Negro?"
Let me mention you four answers:
I. Evolution asserts that "from the
mud came a mollusk, then a reptile,
then a bird, then a beast of low grade,
then a monkey, then a Negro, and then
the higher grades of men up to the
white man. This is an easy way to account
for the origin of the Negro, and
as false as it Is easy. Science denies
it; for it has never yet found the "missing
link" between the reptile and the
bird, between the bird and the beast,
between the monkey and the man.
Scripture denies it; for Its affirms that
the Divine law is that "like begets
like." Racial instinct denies It; for every
true white man abhors the thought
of deriving existence from Negro ancestors.
Religion denies it; for the idea of
our blessed Savior being descended
from a Negro is revolting to the Christ
ia.ri neai i.
II. That the Negro Is a talking beast;
a being in human form, but without a
soul. Such say that the Hebrew word
"chai," in Genesis i, 24, which is translated
"beast," does not mean a quadruped
but a biped, and refers to the Negro.
But this is not true; for repeatedly
in the Bible does "chai" mean a
quadruped. To see the absurdity of
this theory you have only to read the
11th chapter of Leviticus, where three
times the Israelites are granted permission
to eat the "chai." If that
word referred to the Negro, then the
Jew would have one article of food far
more repulsive even than swine's flesh!
This theory is worse than untrue, for
it robs untold millions of their immortal
souls and of any hope of salvation.
It is contrary to Scripture and is contradicted
in its influence and results.
III. That there were two distinct
creations of man. There was first the
creation of mankind in general, which
would include all the inferior races, and
this is recorded in Genesis i, 26. Then
came the creation of the white man, the
royal race of earth, and this is recorded
in Genesis i, 27. This theory bases
its claim upon four things in these
two verses.
(1). The first word in verse 27 is improperly
translated "so." It should be
translated "and," which proves that
verse 27 is not explanatory of verse 26,
but imnlies an additional fact, viz.: an
other creation.
(2). The word used in verse 26 to describe
what God did is "asah," which
only means to make or manufacture;
while in verse 27 it is "bara," which
means to create and is the highest and
strongest word to describe God's power.
Hence as the word used is higher
and nobler in verse 27 than in verse 26.
it is argued what was created was
higher and nobler.
(3). In verse 26 what God created is
expressed by one word, "Adam." Now
as there is no definite article nor demonstrative
pronoun connected with the
word Adam. It simply means man. or
mankind in general. In verse 27 what
God created is expressed by three
words, "Eth-Ha-Adam"?a demonstrative
pronoun, the definite article, and
the word Adam. They thus translate
i "and God created this one, who is the
1 man," 1. e., the one who is by pre-eminence
the man.
3 (4). The word "them," in the phrase
s "let them have dominion" of verse 26
t implies that a plurality of persons or
races was signified by the word Adam
or mankind.
The argument for this theory is given
thus fully, In order that those of us
who believe in the unity of the human
race may see something of the strength
of the theory that we oppose, and that
is virtually accepted by many in our
churches.
Candor compels me also to admit
that this theory does answer many
questions that have perplexed Bible
students, and some of which cannot
otherwise be satisfactorily answered.
Here are some of them.
(1). Why is there another account of
the creation of man in Genesis ii, 27;
unless it is to designate which race was
to be put In Eden and to be the representaive
of mankind In the covenant
with God?
(2). As Genesis v, 4 teaches that "after"
Adam begat Seth "he begat sons
and daughters," it thus Implies that before
the birth of Seth only Cain and
Abel had been born to Adam. Who
then could Cain fear would find and
kill him; and from whom did God protect
him? Genesis iv, 14-15. Who was
there for Cain to marry? And where
did the people come from to inhabit
the city that he built? Genesis v, 17.
(3). If the eight persons saved in the
ark were the only persons in the world,
how and where could Nimrod, the
grandson of Ham, find people enough
to fill four cities, "Babel and Erech and
Accad and Calneh in the land of Shinar?"
Genesis x, 10.
(4). Whence originated those races
of men which are mentioned a number
of times in the BiJ>le, but which are
now extinct? Whence the Emim?the
Anakim?the giants, who were eight
feet or more in height?and the sort of
man that had six Angers on each hand
and six toes on each foot?
(5). If the flood, that occurred 4,248
years ago, destroyed all mankind and
not merely the descendants of him designated
in Scripture as "Eth-HaAdam;"
then how could there have
been a populous kingdom in Egypt
4,500 years ago? How could the nation
of China have been in existence 5,000
years ago.
(6). If the white man and the Negro
were descended from the same
Adam and Eve, when and where was
the miracle wrought that has made
them so different in hair, and odor, and
color and character? From "time immemorial"
this difference has existed.
Egyptian monuments prove that 4,000
years ago these differences were as dis- '
tlnct as they are today. Where in the
Bible is there any account of God's
changing the divine law that "like begets
like."
IV. The Unity of the Human Race.
This is now the teaching of the ChristIan
church, and has been so for centuries.
The arguments for it are from
the Bible, and here are some of them.
(1). Acts xvii, 26. God "hath made
of one blood all nations of men for to
dwell on all the face of the earth."
(2). Romans v, 12, "Wherefore as by
one man sin entered into the world, and
death by sin; and-so death passed upon
all men, for that all have sinned."
Here surely It is implied that Adam
was the head of all men.
(3). I Corinthians, xv, 22. "For as in
Adam all die;" where the death of all
men is attributed to their relation with
Adam."
(4). I Corinthians, xv, 45 and 47?
where Adam is called "the first man."
Now of what has been said this is the
sum: "God's Providence Indicates that
now and in our country is to be solved
the problem, "Whence the Negro?"
The answe: given by evolution, and
that given by those who believe the Negro
to be a beast, are both untrue and
absurd. Wc must choose between the
theory of two creations, and that of
the unity of the human race; and both
of these base their argument upon the
Bible. Let that choice be made honestly,
impartially and prayerfully.
' If the Negro was created separate
from and inferior to the white man;
i then to keep him as our political equal
is a crime, and to permit him to be our
social equal is a sin. It is flagrantly
to insult God by disregarding the dif
Tt. 1 ?? onS
' rerences wmcn xac uu ou wmi, ?,..v
indelibly stamped upon the two races.
But if the Negro is really our brother,
bone of our bone and flesh of our
flesh, having the same father Adam
and Mother Eve; then it would be sinful,
cowardly and mean to desert "our
, brother in black" because he is unfori
tunate. We must love him for his own
i sake, as well as for the Saviour's sake.
I We must elevate him by every means
i in our power, and try to lift him up to
i a level with ourselves. This must be
earnestly and honestly done, or else we
[ who believe in the "unity of the human
; race" must be put under the condemnation
of both God and man.
> Why They Shun the Ministry.?
Prof. A. C. Zenas, of the McCormick
Theological seminary, gave the Baptist
ministers Sunday morning the
reasons why fewer young men join the
ministry now than a few years ago,
1 says the Chicago Tribune. These reasons
are:
Heresy trials.
Uncertainty of the Bible, due to the
higher criticism.
The theological unrest manifested by
society.
" * -" ?'a -Artnirlmr r?nriHi
rjniorcemem. oi iuic i^uni?B ?
dates for the ministry to subscribe to
the creed of the church.
The commercialism of the age.
The spirit of worldliness and self-indulgence.
Lack of spirituality in the churches.
The failure of ministers properly to
present the claims of the church upon
young men.
The hard times of 1893, which prevented
a number of theological students
from completing their education.
The recent commercial prosperity,which
has created an unusual demand
for young men In mercantile pursuits.