= ^ ^ ^ ^ ISSUED S1MIwKl/vnln ?Al?ln? tKo arm nf hta nnm. DUUUCUlJi DCiAIUf, KUM v. u.w panloD. "What Is the matter with you?" asked the former. "Look! Blount, It Is she!" "She?" "The sister of our fellow traveler. Alone and a prisoner! We must save her!" "Restrain yourself." coldly replied Harry Blount. "Our Intervention In behalf of this youug girl would be more hurtful than useful to her." Alcide Jolivet. ready to rush forward, stopped himself, and Nadia. who had not perceived them, beiug half veiled by her hair, passed in her turn before the emir, without attracting his attention. In the meantime, after Nadia. Marfa Strogoff had arrived, and as she did not throw herself quickly enough Into the du$t the guards brutally pushed her. Marfa Strogoff fell. Her son made a terrible movement, which the soldiers who were guarding him could with difficulty master. But old Marfa raised herself, and they were about to drag her when Ivan Ogareff Intervened, saying: "Let this woman remain." As for Nadia. she was thrown back among the crowd of prisoners. The took of Ivan Ogareff bad not fixed Itself upon her. Michael Strogoff was then led before the emir, and there be remained erect, without lowering his eyes. "Your face to the ground!" Ivan Ogareff cried out to him. "No!" replied Michael Strogoff. Two guards wished to force him to bend, but it was they who were thrown to the ground by the hand of the robust young man. Ivan Ogareff advanced toward Michael Strogoff. "You are about to die," said he. "I shall die," fiercely answered Michael Strogoff, "but your face of traitor, Ivan, will not the less bear and forever the infamous mark of the knout!" Ivan Ogareff at this answer became horribly pale. la ?Kio nrloAnnr^" Homnnripfl 1? UU to luto pi iavu\.t ? ? ? ? ? the emir In a voice the more menacing because of its calmness. "A Russian spy," answered Ivan Ogareff. In making out Michael Strogoff a spy he knew the sentence pronounced against him would be the more terrible. Michael Strogoff moved toward Ivan Ogareff. The soldiers stopped him. The emir then made a gesture before which fhe whole crowd bent their heads. Afterward he motioned with his hand for the Koran, which was brought to him. He opened the book and placed bis finger on one of the pages. It was chance, or, rather, as these orientals think, God himself, who was about to decide the fate of Michael Strogoff. The people of central Asia give the name of "fal" to this practice. After having interpreted the sense of the verse touched by the finger of the Judge they apply the sentence, whatever it may be. The emir had left his finger resting on the page of the Koran. The chief of the ulemas, then approaching, read with a loud voice ft verse which finished with these words: "And he shall see no more the things of the earth." "Russian spy." said Feofar-Khan, "you came to see what Is passing In the camp of the Tartars! Look, then, with all your eyes! Look!" TO DE CONTINUED. ? The fight between the Liberal and Conserative armies of Colombia that had been going on around Colon, Isthmus of Panama, for about two weeks, came to an end last Thursday upon the defeat of the Liberals by the government forces. The Liberals had possession of the town of Colon and it looked as if they were in a position to hold it, when the Conseratives surprised them by bringing a large force to an unexpected point by cutting a passage through the thick forests that had been looked upon as a protection. During the fight, trains were operated regularly across the isthmus between the Atlantic and Pacific, under guard of United States marines. Neither side attempted to molest these trains as they both realized the conseouences of complications with the United States government. pijfttlattwus ^tading. TRIAL OF CLAIB HERBERT. A Remarkable Scene In a Texas , Conrt of Justice. General George F. Alford, of Dallas, Texas, has told many good stories to i the press, but the following Is among i his very best He says It Is not orlgl- j nal, but his friends who know his pe- ] culiar felicitous style will not believe It. The general \s one of the oldest i residents and besti known men in Tex- ; as?a scholar, poel statesman and pa- < trlot. i The name of Jones Rivers awakens in the minds of many of the older res- ( idents of Texas, and especially of the , older members or the bar, memories or the wit, orator and lawyer who played so conspicuous a part for many years In the courts of Texas, and more particularly In the counties contiguous to the Brazos and Colorado rivers, thirty or forty years ago. Bright, Joyous and witty, even the approach of death could not conquer or repress his natural exuberance of Bplrlt; for when, on a cold, dismal evening In November, In the then dreary hamlet of Georgetown, now a prosperous city, he was told that his hour had come, he met the relentless messenger with a smile, Jested in his very face, and, with a > witticism upon his lips, passed into the { land of shadows. s He was genial In manner, eloquent 1 in speech, forcible in argument and , strong In everything save the power to j resist the seductive influences of the , Intoxicating cup. He possessed in an ( eminent degree the "divine afflatus" j that belongs as trutly to the natural } orator as to the true poet; and when | enlisted in a cause that aroused his t sympathies, or when he felt the stimu- , lating influence of the wine cup, he j could, with dramatic skill, touch the ( hearts of his hearers, and by the mes- ] meric fervor of his matchless eloquence ( stir their deepest emotions. This ir- , resistible power was never more sig- , nally displayed than in the defense of J his friend, Colonel C. C. Herbert,, fa- i miliarly known as "Claib Herbert" in ] the district court of Colorado county, more than a third of a century ago. Claib Herbert was a superb type of a Southern planter under the old regime. Born in Virginia, reared in the fertile fields and genial climate of Texas, with a big heart in a brawny, muscular body, he was hospitable, liberal, generous, brave and sympathetic. He lived on his beautiful plantation on the banks of the charming Colorado, just below the town fit Columbus. A man < of learning and influence, he served as a representative in the Texan legislature and the Confederate congress, and held a commission as colonel in the southern army. The family was a distinguished one in the annals of Virginia, of Texas and California; his brother, Colonel Phil Herbert, having been a member of the national congress from the last named state before the late war between the states, and was killed gallantly leading his regiment of Texas cavalry in desperate assault upon Fort Butler. As Claib Herbet sat one day at his table, with a number of guests, the meal was interrupted by the appearance at the door of a little boy, perhaps 8 years of age, an orphan, who lived with a neighbor named Howard in the relation of a ward or apprentice. The child was crying bitterly, trembling, and seemingly frightened and suffering. Herbert questioned him and the boy said between his sobs that Howard had beaten him unmercifully and without cause. Herbert carried him Into an adjoining room, examined him, and found his body cruelly striped and bearing other evidence of severe punishment. The kind planter soothed him, and, seating him at the table, assured him of protection, and endeavored to quiet his fear that Howard would pursue and carry him back. This Howard was a Yankee, of the Mayflower type, a representative Purltan, Pharisaical In pretentions, sanctimonious In manner, solemn In visage, with a drawling, nasal mode of speech, and a countenance that was a perpetual Interrogation point. Of a cruel nature, he was destitute of bowels of compassion, having apparently but one bowel, and this seemingly Illustrated the maxim of geometry which affirms that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. The boy's fear of pursuit was not without cause. Hardly was the dinner finished when Howard rode up to the gate and called for Colonel Herbert, who responded with promptness. Howard inquired whether he had seen the boy, adding that it had been necessary to chastise him severely that morning, and that afterward he had ran away, and he had traced his bare feet coming in that direction. Herbert made no reply, but walked quietly out through the open gate?seized Howard as he sat ' on ms nor.se, puueu mm uu, aim ga< c him then and there and unmerciful flogging:, saying as he released him: "That will teach you not to beat another child, you infernal scoundrel!' Howard remounted his horse and rode away without Indulging in any remarks. The district court was then sitting in Columbus, the seat of justice in Colorado county. Howard proceeded by the most direct road to that place, and appeared without delay before the grand jury, who promptly brought in a bill of indictment against Herbert for i aggravated assault .and battery. Jones Rivers, as counsel for the defendant, demanded an immediate trial. : Colonel Edward Waller was district attorney, for whom Waller county, Texas, was named as a memorial. The only witness for the state was Howi ard, who told his story, was rigorous| ly cross-examined, and the prosecu! tion rested their case. 1 Jones Rivers stood up. "If the court please," he said, 'the defendant In this case has no evidence to offer, excepting the feeble child that has been beaten by the prosecuting witness." Here he led the little boy forward and seated him at his side, in front of the jury. The boy was even smaller than his years, of delicate physique, and showed in his pinched face and 3cant clothes traces of suffering and privation?the look of neglected orphanflood in poverty. The case was closed. Counsel for the state said, that in submitting it to the lury he had only to say that as there was no defense, the Jury could do aothlng but return a verdict of guilty. Rivers knew that every technical rule )f law was against his client, and that there was no legal defense to the state's case; but at the same time he tnew every man on that Jury, and all their domestic relations. He knew that the oldest juryman, the foreman, had narried late in life and had two chiliren, twin boys, just the age of the ittle orphan, to whom he was passionately devoted. He knew, too, that le had been a fellow soldier in the rev>lutionary army of Texas, with the father of the boy that had been the /Ictim of Howard's brutality. Making 10 preliminary reference to these facts, lowever, Rivers said: "Gentlemen of the jury, the state of Texas has presented her evidence and stated her case, and I rise now to speak for the defendant, Claib Heraert, your fellow citizen, and your leighbor, your friend and mine, and :he friend of all who need a friend, and ipon whose ears the orphan's cry nev?r falls in vain. The only evidence I lave to offer on his behalf is the pale face, the tearful eye, and the frail, aruised form of the little orphan that sits at my side, of the child whose he oic father shared with some of you n Clays now gone, me narusiuya ui mc :amp and the dangers of the battle. He was at San Jacinto when the star )f the young republic rose triumphant ibove that historic field, and with him, fou Mr. Foreman, participated In the mdying glories of that eventful day. \nd when peace came you began, side jy side, as neighbors and friends the mttle of hardships and poverty, in the lew land that you had aided In rescung from the hands of the spoiler. That battle you have fought well, Mr. Foreman, and are still spared to your jrateful country; but your old comrade las been gathered to his fathers. He narrled late in life and accumulated iut a scant store of this world's goods, ind this child, the only fruit of the narriage, was, In the providence of 3od, left a penniless orphan, and what late befell him you know full well. For aught I know, Mr. Foreman, you nay have now, when old, little ones :hat are as dear to you as was this joor child to that aged father who deeps his last long sleep in the soil le periled his life to defend. As Rivers proceeded, he drew near to :he jury, and spoke In soft, but earn;st tones, while an occasional tear itole down the cheeks of the old forenan. Rivers saw this, and continued. "Time Is fast weaving threads of silver among your dark locks; your feet ire pressing the brink of the river that lows between this and the unknown and, and soon, leaving perhaps to four little ones an inheritance of poverty, as did the father of this child to llm, you must go to Join your silent :omrade on the other side of the dark, :old river, and then perchance these lear little ones may be consigned like four comrade's boy, to the tender mer ' Unnrar^ Thon tVlP ;itra ui aumc uiuiai iiunatu. * ..v.. .... lttle arms that so often encircled your leek In the loving emurace may be aised to shield the tender forms which fou now clasp lovingly to your bosom, igainst the blows such as fell so cruely on this poor little orphan. Then nay the dimpled cheeks that now glow vith the rosy hue of health, be sunken ind pale from neglect and want; the ;yes that now brighten at your comng, may be red with weeping and the jentle voices that fall like sweetest nusic on your eager ears, be heard heading In pathetic, beseeching tones 'or mercy, as the voice of this child fell on the unheeding ear of the prosicutlng witness; and then perchance !?od in his infinite mercy may raise jp for those little ones a friend and in avenger as He raised up Clalb Heraert to avenge the wrongs of this defenseless orphan, and perhaps that friend may be, as Claib Herbert is this lay, charged as a criminal, and if so, Mr. Foreman, would you have him punished?" As the last words were uttered, Rivers was so near the old foreman that ie could lay his hand on his head, and ipparently spoke to him alone. The climax was reached; human nature could stand no more. The old foreman rose from his chair trembling in every nerve, and raising his clenched hands ibove his head, in a voice quivering tvith emotion, cried: "No! no by the eternal, no!" and Iropping into his seat, with his face in his hands, sobbed aloud; and judge, counsel and bystanders mingled their tears with his. Rivers at once sat down, and the district attorney arose to make a concluding argument for the state, but before he had concluded the opening sentence, the old foreman, with streaming eyes and with a tremulous voice, said: "Edwin Waller! sit down! You are ?3 or?/1 Q rrnA/1 1 a itrvpr Hi 1 f 1 guuu man auu a ... sit down! We don't want to hear you talk another word!" Waller sat down, and the judge simply read the statute defining the offense and fixing the penalty, and directed the jury to retire and consider t>f their verdict. Whereupon the old foreman rose and, without any consultation whatever of his co-jurors, said: "Not guilty, your honor; not guilty!" "So say you all, gentlemen?" asked the court. "So say we all!" responded the en tire Jury, and the verdict having beer properly reduced to writing and slgnec the jury were discharged. Thus the trial of Clalb Howard was ended, and thus the most remarkabU scene ever witnessed In a Texas court of Justice closed.?Chicago Law Journal. ORIGIN OF THE NEGRO. The Scripture* Are Searched For LlRht on the Qneatlon. The following interesting article on the origin of the NegrO, from the pen of Rev. Dr. J. B. Mack, of Fort Mill, Is reproduced from the Charlotte Observer, of last Sunday: Whence the Negro? This Is a dark otiVv4a/if on nornlovtna OUUJCb I., C%1* VAVVVUlllgljr pvi pivniHQ problem. Yet Its solution Is vital to some doctrines of the church, and also vital In determining the nature of our national government. Indeed If we think of the strange Introduction of Negro slavery Into our land and Its peculiar phases In colonial days; If we notice how It colored almost every question In congress from 1789 to 1861; If we study the causes of our great civil war; If we consider how this matter has made the south almost solidly Democratic and the north almost solidly Republican from 1868 to 1900, we must conclude that this problem has been the main pivot of our national differences and doings. This being the case, It is clear that God's Providence intends for our nation to solve this problem. As the Lord made Esther to be Queen of Persia for a special purpose, so He has made our country to be a queen among the nations of this world for a wonderful work, viz.: The determining of the relations of the various races to each other, and especially the relation of the white man to the Negro. Hence we have in our land all of the four races: the white man of Europe, the red men of America, the yellow man of Asia and the black man of Africa. The position of the Negro has ever been very varied and always peculiar. Some have regarded him as a beast, others as an inferior race of mankind, and others as the image of God cut In ebony as the white man is that image cut in ivory. Today in some states the Negro can vote, hold office and inter marry with the whites, in otner spates he can vote and hold office, but the line is drawn at marriage. In other states he is voted (sometimes even after he is dead) but cannot ride in the same car or eat at the same table with white folks; while in some others even the right of voting is virtually denied him. Now is it right to make these distinctions? Is it right to debar the Negro from voting and from holding office, if he is intelligent? Is it right to forbid his eating and drinking and marrying with white folks anj?where, provided the whites are willing? The answer to these questions depends on the answer to the question "Whence the Negro?" Let me mention you four answers: I. Evolution asserts that "from the mud came a mollusk, then a reptile, then a bird, then a beast of low grade, then a monkey, then a Negro, and then the higher grades of men up to the white man. This is an easy way to account for the origin of the Negro, and as false as it Is easy. Science denies it; for it has never yet found the "missing link" between the reptile and the bird, between the bird and the beast, between the monkey and the man. Scripture denies it; for Its affirms that the Divine law is that "like begets like." Racial instinct denies It; for every true white man abhors the thought of deriving existence from Negro ancestors. Religion denies it; for the idea of our blessed Savior being descended from a Negro is revolting to the Christ ia.ri neai i. II. That the Negro Is a talking beast; a being in human form, but without a soul. Such say that the Hebrew word "chai," in Genesis i, 24, which is translated "beast," does not mean a quadruped but a biped, and refers to the Negro. But this is not true; for repeatedly in the Bible does "chai" mean a quadruped. To see the absurdity of this theory you have only to read the 11th chapter of Leviticus, where three times the Israelites are granted permission to eat the "chai." If that word referred to the Negro, then the Jew would have one article of food far more repulsive even than swine's flesh! This theory is worse than untrue, for it robs untold millions of their immortal souls and of any hope of salvation. It is contrary to Scripture and is contradicted in its influence and results. III. That there were two distinct creations of man. There was first the creation of mankind in general, which would include all the inferior races, and this is recorded in Genesis i, 26. Then came the creation of the white man, the royal race of earth, and this is recorded in Genesis i, 27. This theory bases its claim upon four things in these two verses. (1). The first word in verse 27 is improperly translated "so." It should be translated "and," which proves that verse 27 is not explanatory of verse 26, but imnlies an additional fact, viz.: an other creation. (2). The word used in verse 26 to describe what God did is "asah," which only means to make or manufacture; while in verse 27 it is "bara," which means to create and is the highest and strongest word to describe God's power. Hence as the word used is higher and nobler in verse 27 than in verse 26. it is argued what was created was higher and nobler. (3). In verse 26 what God created is expressed by one word, "Adam." Now as there is no definite article nor demonstrative pronoun connected with the word Adam. It simply means man. or mankind in general. In verse 27 what God created is expressed by three words, "Eth-Ha-Adam"?a demonstrative pronoun, the definite article, and the word Adam. They thus translate i "and God created this one, who is the 1 man," 1. e., the one who is by pre-eminence the man. 3 (4). The word "them," in the phrase s "let them have dominion" of verse 26 t implies that a plurality of persons or races was signified by the word Adam or mankind. The argument for this theory is given thus fully, In order that those of us who believe in the unity of the human race may see something of the strength of the theory that we oppose, and that is virtually accepted by many in our churches. Candor compels me also to admit that this theory does answer many questions that have perplexed Bible students, and some of which cannot otherwise be satisfactorily answered. Here are some of them. (1). Why is there another account of the creation of man in Genesis ii, 27; unless it is to designate which race was to be put In Eden and to be the representaive of mankind In the covenant with God? (2). As Genesis v, 4 teaches that "after" Adam begat Seth "he begat sons and daughters," it thus Implies that before the birth of Seth only Cain and Abel had been born to Adam. Who then could Cain fear would find and kill him; and from whom did God protect him? Genesis iv, 14-15. Who was there for Cain to marry? And where did the people come from to inhabit the city that he built? Genesis v, 17. (3). If the eight persons saved in the ark were the only persons in the world, how and where could Nimrod, the grandson of Ham, find people enough to fill four cities, "Babel and Erech and Accad and Calneh in the land of Shinar?" Genesis x, 10. (4). Whence originated those races of men which are mentioned a number of times in the BiJ>le, but which are now extinct? Whence the Emim?the Anakim?the giants, who were eight feet or more in height?and the sort of man that had six Angers on each hand and six toes on each foot? (5). If the flood, that occurred 4,248 years ago, destroyed all mankind and not merely the descendants of him designated in Scripture as "Eth-HaAdam;" then how could there have been a populous kingdom in Egypt 4,500 years ago? How could the nation of China have been in existence 5,000 years ago. (6). If the white man and the Negro were descended from the same Adam and Eve, when and where was the miracle wrought that has made them so different in hair, and odor, and color and character? From "time immemorial" this difference has existed. Egyptian monuments prove that 4,000 years ago these differences were as dis- ' tlnct as they are today. Where in the Bible is there any account of God's changing the divine law that "like begets like." IV. The Unity of the Human Race. This is now the teaching of the ChristIan church, and has been so for centuries. The arguments for it are from the Bible, and here are some of them. (1). Acts xvii, 26. God "hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth." (2). Romans v, 12, "Wherefore as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and-so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned." Here surely It is implied that Adam was the head of all men. (3). I Corinthians, xv, 22. "For as in Adam all die;" where the death of all men is attributed to their relation with Adam." (4). I Corinthians, xv, 45 and 47? where Adam is called "the first man." Now of what has been said this is the sum: "God's Providence Indicates that now and in our country is to be solved the problem, "Whence the Negro?" The answe: given by evolution, and that given by those who believe the Negro to be a beast, are both untrue and absurd. Wc must choose between the theory of two creations, and that of the unity of the human race; and both of these base their argument upon the Bible. Let that choice be made honestly, impartially and prayerfully. ' If the Negro was created separate from and inferior to the white man; i then to keep him as our political equal is a crime, and to permit him to be our social equal is a sin. It is flagrantly to insult God by disregarding the dif Tt. 1 ?? onS ' rerences wmcn xac uu ou wmi, ?,..v indelibly stamped upon the two races. But if the Negro is really our brother, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, having the same father Adam and Mother Eve; then it would be sinful, cowardly and mean to desert "our , brother in black" because he is unfori tunate. We must love him for his own i sake, as well as for the Saviour's sake. I We must elevate him by every means i in our power, and try to lift him up to i a level with ourselves. This must be earnestly and honestly done, or else we [ who believe in the "unity of the human ; race" must be put under the condemnation of both God and man. > Why They Shun the Ministry.? Prof. A. C. Zenas, of the McCormick Theological seminary, gave the Baptist ministers Sunday morning the reasons why fewer young men join the ministry now than a few years ago, 1 says the Chicago Tribune. These reasons are: Heresy trials. Uncertainty of the Bible, due to the higher criticism. The theological unrest manifested by society. " * -" ?'a -Artnirlmr r?nriHi rjniorcemem. oi iuic i^uni?B ? dates for the ministry to subscribe to the creed of the church. The commercialism of the age. The spirit of worldliness and self-indulgence. Lack of spirituality in the churches. The failure of ministers properly to present the claims of the church upon young men. The hard times of 1893, which prevented a number of theological students from completing their education. The recent commercial prosperity,which has created an unusual demand for young men In mercantile pursuits.