The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, February 03, 2006, Page 3, Image 3
VIEWPOINTS
AMECOCK
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editor \
STEVEN VAN HAREN
News Editor \
JUSTIN CHAPURA
Assistant News Editor j
JACKIE ALEXANDER
The Mix Editor \
ALEXIS ARNONE
Design Director
CHAS MCCARTHY
Sports Editor
STEPHEN FASTENAU
AssistantViewpoints Editor
AARON BRAZIER
Viewpoints Editor
BRINDY McNAIR
IN OUR OPINION
Implosion represents
step forwardfor USC
At 8 ajn. Sunday, Carolina Plaza — USC’s former
Visitor Center and hotel — will be blown to bits with
500 pounds of dynamite.
Aside from likely being a grade-A 'fireworks display,
the implosion at the corner of Assembly and Pendleton
streets will signify the importance of looking ahead
by clearing away the past. The new, improved USC
| s slowly emerging, making way for the research
beacon Innovista and the new Arnold School of Public
Health.
After months of skipping over the mind-numbing
__» —_
Let’s not go crazy
and pull down
Melton Observatory
to make way for a
tiny research nook.
■L/uxiumg cam viucw wn
Gamecock Cable channel
20, you’ll finally have a
reason to watch. It will be
a riveting few seconds.
Kudos to those in charge
for imploding a building
that many of us have
never been in and scarcely
care about. It’s been an
ugly — dare we say fugly — eyesore for quite a while.
Columbia’s skyline should reflect that this is, actually,
11 college town — and that that college has much to ao
".vith the city’s identity.
The University of Texas Tower stretches 30 stories
into the Austin sky, according to UT’s Web site. When
tourists point and ask questions, the answers always
point to the university. We need that kind of instant
recognition — maybe not with sheer height, but with a
certain futuristic panache.
Williams-Brice Stadium almost works; the Coker
Life Sciences Building comes close. But it’s buildings
such as the Strom — state-of-the-art facilities with a
flair for the future — that will show passers-by we’re
growing into a major educational powerhouse. Almost
no one will be able to touch our undergraduate research
program, and shiny new buildings must come with the
territory.
And there’s nothing wrong with older, historic
^buildings and our campus’ bucolic charm. Let’s not go
"crazy and pull down Melton Observatory to make way
for a tiny research nook. USC should — and almost
always has — keep its eye on an ambitious future while
remembering its humble past.
IT’S YOUR RIGHT
Voice your opinion on message
boards at www.dailygamecock.com
or send letters to the editor at
gamecockopinions@gwm.sc. edu
CORRECTIONS
^ If you see an error in today’s paper, we want to know about
Pt. E-mail us at gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu
ABOUT THE GAMECOCK
tuutor
STEVEN VAN HAREN
Design Director
chas McCarthy
Copy Desk Chief
AARON KIDD
News Editor
JUSTIN CHAPURA
Assistant News Editor
JACKIE ALEXANDER
Viewpoints Editor
BRINDY McNAIR
Assistant Viewpoints Editor
AARON BRAZIER
The Mix Editor
ALEXIS ARNONE
Assistant Mix Editor
■ USTEN TRUESOALE
sports Editor
STEPHEN FASTENAU
Assistant Sports Editor
ALEX RILEY
Photo Editor
NICK ESARES
Assistant Photo Editor
KATY BLALOCK
Page Designers
MIKE CONWAY, KATE
FENWICK, MEGAN SINCLAIR
StajfWriters
A.J. BEMBRY, TOM
BENNING JESS DAVIS, TIM
McMANUS, MARJORIE
RIDDLE, GINA VASSELLI
Copy Editors
PATRICK MASTERSON,
BETHANY NICHOLS,
ELIZABETH PARHAM, KATIE
THOMPSON, JAMISON
TINS'tEY, KRYSTAL
-JMCDDCD I 17 U/UITP
CONTACT INFORMATION
Offices located on the third floor ofthe Russell House
Editor’s office hours are from 2-3 p.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays
Editor: gamecockeditorQgum.sc.edu
News: gamecocknewsQgwm.sc.edu
Viewpoints: gamecockopinionsQgwm. sc. edu
The Mix: gamecockfeaturesQgwm.sc.edu
Sports: gamecocksportsQgwm.sc.edu
Public Affairs: gamecockPRQyahoo.com
Online: www.dailygamecock.com
Newsroom: 777-7726 ; Sports: 777-7182
Editor’s Office: 777-3914
STUDENT MEDIA
Director
SCOn LINDENBERG
Faculty Adviser
ERIK COUINS
Creative Director
SUSAN KING
Business Manager
CAROLYN GRIFFIN
Advertising Manager
SARAH SCARBOROUGH
Classifieds Manager
SHERRY F. HOLMES
Production Manager
c. neil scon
i
THE GAMECOCK is the
editorially independent
student newspaper of the
University of South Carolina.
It is published Monday,
Wednesday and Friday during
the fall and spring semesters
and nine times during the
summer with the exception of
university holidays and exam
periods. Opinions expressed in
THE GAMECOCK are those
of the editors or author and
not those of the University of
South Carolina. The Board
of Student Publications
and Communications
is the publisher 0/THE
GAMECOCK. The
Department of Student
Media is the newspaper’s
parent organization. THE
GAMECOCK is supported
in part by student-activity
fees. One free copy per reader.
Additional copies may be
purchased for Si each from the
Department of Student Media.
3%
UNION
^ K)wnn
BOWNftW
tutuvw*.
-Yi?
Courtesy KRT Campus
Sarcasm: offensive form of communication?
Don’t take everything
literally — some irony
makes things better
Many things happen
over the course of a week.
There’s stuff like news,
opinions, sports and
people buying stuff. Most
of it filters in through our
minds. And then it filters
out more quickly than an
unwanted question in the
president’s mind. Some
stuff actually lodges in our
brains, though.
Perhaps you saw a
gorgeous person. Perhaps
you had an awesome
workout session. Maybe
some idiot behind you
made a comment about
hives being contracted
from bees. I don’t know.
And frankly, I don’t care,
because what happened to
me was a whole lot more
funny.
Now, let me give some
background. Sarcasm is
a form of irony used for
comedic purposes. If I
say, “Wow, that Democrat
seems like he has good
plans for the economy”
you should know that I’m
being bitterly sarcastic.
After all, everyone knows
Republicans and Democrats
are as capable
of governing
as my non
existent pet
rabbit.
Given this
context, a
phone call
was made
to The
Gamecock
about one of
our articles. The sarcasm
in this article was obvious
and heavy. It was so heavy
that I could barely lift my
desktop to read it. Well,
that was probably because
desktops are heavy, but you
see my point.
Sometimes we column
writers use humor, such as
a pun or play on words, to
convey a point.
Is rap music like politics?
No! Despite any of our
columnist’s opinions,
they’re totally different.
One features violent,
opinionated folk putting
on a facade of strength to
intimidate other people,
and the other is rap music.
So this comment (which
cannot be printed because
of its sheer stupidity) forced
me into uncomfortable
waters. The battle in my
soul, the metaphysical
divide of my heart, was
ARROA
BRRZIER
Fourth-year
philosophy
student
whether I hated or pitied
the person.
It was that stupid.
The Apocalypse was
canceled because, as Satan
said, “It’s just not worth it
right now.” It was the kind
of comment that destroyed
worlds.
And this world
destroying complaint
was based on a
misunderstanding of
sarcasm. Not subtle
sarcasm like the kind I get
away with all the time (it’s
cool having a southern/
English accent). I’m talking
about hammer-in-the head
sarcasm.
The victim of this story
is you — the common
student. You got burned.
Right now, someone out
there hates all that is funny
and intelligent and decent
in the world. This person
probably thinks Monty
Python is bourgeoisie and
“Chappelle’s Show” is
tacky.
We think terrorism is
bad, but this nightmare
strikes at the heart and
soul of everyone in the
world. Somebody has got
to put a stop to the pain.
But does anybody have the
emotional strength to fight
such immense crappiness?
Buffoons aside, students want 'Real World9
Carolina Productions
inhibited by policies,
most popular choices
I had planned for this
week a column highlighting
my gross domestic
incompetence and my
trials and tribulations as
a young man attempting
to successfully navigate a
kitchen for the first time
without the help of his
mother. Alas, recent events
have prompted me to ditch
that column at the last
minute and write this one
instead.
Monday’s staff editorial
in The Gamecock was
probably the best one I’ve
seen as a student here.
I am one of those people
who has gone to see
“Brokeback Mountain.”
And, as of yet, I have not
started propositioning
every guy I see to leave his
wife, hop in my truck and
head off to the scenic and
conveniently secluded hills
of Wyoming.
Wednesday morning,
I cracked open The
Gamecock to find yet
another editorial that I’ve
taken a special interest in.
In case you weren’t aware,
five members of “The
Real World:
Austin”
cast were
welcomed
on campus
last night
by Carolina
Productions
for a lecture
and Q&A
session
about their
experiences on the show.
The editorial points out
— quite legitimately in
my opinion — that “The
Real World” stars carry
about the same merit as
lecturers that giraffes carry
as convenient household
pets.
I was a member of the
10-student executive board
that voted to bring this
group to campus.
Allow me to explain why
we did. We were aiming
to bring a recognizable
personality to campus early
in February. We actually
considered A1 Franken, but
that idea was quickly shot
down simply because he
doesn’t quite have enough
sex appeal to attract the
audience we were shooting
for.
We then considered
former President Bill
Clinton, but quickly
CHASE
STOUDCnmiRE
Second-year
history
student
dropped that idea upon
realizing that he carries far
too much sex appeal for
our target audience. •
We were stuck. Luckily,
an idea we had looked
into earlier in the year
resurfaced at the perfect
moment, inspiring us to
decide on the “The Real
World” — a petting zoo.
How cool would it be if
Carolina Productions could
bring exotic creatures such
as llamas, orangutans and
penguins to tbe Russell
House and give them free
roam so that students could
interact with them? Pretty
frickin’ cool!
Remembering how many
rules and policies that
would violate, we settled on
the next best thing: “The
Real World” cast. Equally
novelistic, relatively
animalistic behavior, yet
potty-trained.
Of course, I made all
that up. But this I swear is
true: MTV sucks. These
shows, to a certain degree,
make me lose all faith in
humanity. Either way,
year after year, people
watch them. Students
will continue to enjoy
seeing them, and Carolina
Productions will continue
to justifiably bring them.
Online Poll
Do you think Porn Sunday and other pornography
deference programs are necessary at USC?
Total votes: 199
High-heeled
shackers can
- •
forget grungy
walk of shame
Late-night study breaks
don’t have to end with
embarrassing trip home
Imagine, if you will, a
beautiful morning at USC
— birds are chirping, leaf
1 1
uiuwcia die
screaming
and a girl .
wearing high
heels and last
night’s makeup
is sneaking
back into her
dorm. She’s
an interesting
specimen I like
to call “The
Shacker.”
JOSEPH
REESE
Third-year
fashion mer
chandising
student
lhese ladies or the night
are so concerned about their
studies that they end up
falling asleep at a classmate’s
apartment. Just for the sake
of fun we’ll go ahead and
believe that story. What
these shackers are doing the
night before their walk home
is not the root of my point.
My concern is that these
poor scholastic-driven girls
are given a bad reputation.
For example, if you pass
a girl on the way to your 8
a.m. class who is wearing
a very small skirt and even
smaller tube top, you have to
wonder if she really thinks
she’s fooling anyone. She’s
not.
This is terribly unfair.
Guys can go out at night and
wear what they wore to class
that day and just happen to
“forget to change” the next
day. There needs to be a
change, some help for these
poor girls in distress when
they wake up and realize they
have to go home in the same
outfit as the night before.
The university puts a lot
of money into a lot of very
useful things — like large
maps to help those who are
unfamiliar with campus find
every female dorm within a
two block radius — so why
not put some into a fund
for shackers? Sounds crazy,
I know, but hear me out.
What if, while getting a tour
of our beautiful campus,
a prospective student’s
mother saw one of these
ladies stumble up the steps
to Moore dorm? I only have
the university’s best interests
in mind here, honestly.
With a shaker fund we can
do great things for these ladies
who forget to bring their
own shack-pack with them
the night before. It would be
like one of those glass cases
with a hammer next to it that
would read, “BREAK IN
CASE OF EMERGENCY
SHACK.” Inside would be
a bag full of items necessary
to make the commute back
home a pleasant one. There
would be a hair-tie, makeup
remover, a T-shirt with “I
slept over in McBryde and
all I got was this lousy shirt”
printed on it — hey you
aren’t getting out of it that
easy — flip-flops and some
soffe shorts. Granted, it’s not
the most glamorous outfit in
the world, but we’re low on
funding as it is, and it’s a hell
of a lot better than a twisted
ankle and smeared makeup.
Submission policy
Letters to the editor should be
less than 300 words and include
name, phone number, profes
sional title or year and major, if a
student. E-mail letters to game
cockopinions@gwm.sc.edu. Let
ters will be edited. Anonymous
letters will not be published. Call
the newsroom at 777-7726 for '