University of South Carolina Libraries
Mosl ! were not on the rv/\t?o/\np f Kn f *r pci ouuo uiai it | Secretary of I ) Schlesinger, Sen ! mond, R-S.C., bo; : Eston Marchai secretary Dr. Ge THE LETTER, Mil _ ^ ^ jran Please fin correspondence apology for und< tegrity of the President of Stuc at the University c Columbia, S.C. I sincerely hope 1976 correspon overlooked as unequivically (si The < Mr. Mosley's seer to sign his name t< it needed to I mediately. As pa Mrs. Dozier was ? Mosley's name to been done in the f it was not an unus the secretaries Government o correspondance Government offic sence when thoj aware of the < correspondance. not read the letl aware of its conte the secretaries in been instructed initials after the Student Goverr name. Mrs. Doz the possibility of \\ Gc jL,? ADM. $2.50 | \rm UUi _3 iTT I P^C ADM. $2.50 Adults Only! ' STUD mn From p?ge 1 firinl SO statinnnrv guest list of 32 signatures of Wilsford, icluded former Putnam. >efense James All three came undei i. Strom Thur- copies of the letter w< ard chairman T. Marchant, Curry, S( it and board Thurmond and Gov. orge Curry. Edwards. "I knew they (Wilsf< written on of- Chief Justice Russell From Page 1 d attached, In closing, again, pl< demanding an my humble apology f( ;rmining the in- barrassment or dis< office of Vice- might be or have been si lent Government Your kind considerat )f South Carolina, greatly appreciated. i that the May 13, Respectfully yc dence will be Gerald T. Mo totally and President c) insignificant! Student Govern Gamecocketary, waa asked her Student Governm* o the letter, since to some other Univers oe mailed im- with Dean Robert A1 rt of her duties, least two months prioi isked to sign Mr. Her departure fror the letter as had Government and her >ast. At that time employment at anothei ual procedure for the University had in the Student nothing to do with ffice to sign mentioned letter, for the Student The following peop :ers in their ab- September 30, 1976 to >e officers were above facts and to agrc contents of the Dozier's complete inm Mrs. Dozier did good faith in this matte ter and was not affirmed in the same nts. At that time, which the original the office had not impression of Mrs. E to affix their tivitipc wnc nroato.-! ii - t .v.x/w ?? v?u Vft VUtVU 11 signature of any page article by M lment officer's Trimarchi in the Ga ier had sicqssed Monday, September 27 a transfer from Ml 799-6723 CD??E i A ? I. i - n vjourmer s Delight Happy Hour 4:30-6:30 (two for one) >urinet Sandwiches Served Till 12 Midnight Great Drinks - Nightly Entertainment pen Mon.-Thurs. 11-1. Fri. 11-2, Sat. 11-12 lliiniiJiiM ' ! MMiBiL .. JUi K?lill H %WFMdf&74d columbia lateshows wywpwfc fri.&sat. 11:15 1 Tf you haVeFTt xisssr pseen it jhen miM IIC i li'H AROLp'andMAUD MgjSaFRI.&SAT. 11:151 see IT^ATL^ rHlNDA^)^ I LUVCLMV-C "lipg [j FOR PRESIDENT^ BUY ABC DISCOUNT TICKETS A ENTS! BOOKSTORE ft RUSSELL HOUSE ITIT?yT?ltggf HIIH were talking about sendir to President Patterson, flOt write it nor did I - " Mosley said. "After the letter was re I suggested in a very sarc bore the (Wilsford) send ; Mosley and Gov Edwards," Mosley On May 24, Mosley se * fire when sonai jetter to Patterso >re sent to that he was not involve hlessinger, writing of the May 13 lei James B. text of letter at far left.] "If at any point he (Moi nn^ cr J r OV\ he did not approve of th< Putnam) wouid have sia(j 'Fine' an that," Wilsford said. "Technically, I did \ ?? letter," Wilsford said. "Technically, I did > letter," Wilsford said. "E iase accept Gerald the letter from >r any em- pad before it was typed u iredit you wording remained basii jbjected to. same." ion will be MOSLEY, WHO SAID 1 support the letter, neve ?urs, his disapproval for the le sley. Vice- Wilsford read it to both Putnam, Wilsford said, ment "I felt like I was receiv of the heads," Wilsford s (Mosley) participated 1 om Page 1 beginning and I felt that approval enough." On May 31, Putnam memorandum to Mos ;nt position ity position : exander : to May 7. ! Student subsequent - branch of absolutely : the above- : le met on ; clarify the e that Mrs. : >cence and : : need to be : I manner in erroneous ozier's ac- g| 1 the front r. Mickey ; mecock of I , 1976. : BMBWE,. ? JLii <! 'm ;> : I ' I # jgjm^g^a^^Sa^^BySgggS^-:: '4j1 i a stud U ! | The sportcoat of A N ', : plaid by Arthur Fr r'l m J and wool Shetlarn " L^JI M * nf Qmtlanrl . W . wvv/Ui4l ru, L/UIM 3 julJt pleasantries for y< ""uil Pressley's in the i ^|j N , charges and studi k/il n ' welcome Free pa I / I H located only four, I UPH : T USC P AND ig a letter response to your letter o but I did 1976, in which you dem si(?n it." aDoloev for the misuse name in the May 13, 1976 sad to me, Patterson. astic tone The memo, obtained a copy to Gamecock through a cc said. source, included the nt a per- recollections by Putnam n stating "The letter was preser jd in the for my signature on Ma; tter. (See At that time there > ? signatures on the letter, ] sley) said Wilsford's and yours. I i 2 letter, I to point out that I am ( d left it at familiar with your signal I received mv copies of vrite the 24, 1976, correspond Friday, May 25,1976,1 di vrite the any correspondance v lut I read signatures on it. There w my legal that I could have knowi .p and the had not personally sig cally the name. In view of yoi verbal support of the le was no reason to suspect le did not name had been misii r showed contents of the typed tter when pea red to be exactly thi him and the letter that Mr. Wil l t it r reau iu us>. 1, uieieiuie, ing a nod letter. ;aid. "He rom the 44MY NEXT converse this was you about the May 13 curred in your office < sent a morning of May 24, ley "in stepped out of your i ^y jfffi'i'h ' itdHj y in the da land loomed Shetland eedberg of Boston. Linen d woven sweater, by McGeorgi an investment in the fall 9ars to come. At Lytle Nade Hampton Hotel. Bank ^nts'personal charges irking in the hotel lot, jf blocks from campus. TRADITIONAL CLOT Ua(?1 VIJ ~ J - II nuici nduc nampion f May 24, asked to S] anded an into your o! s of your conversati< lnltnn" tn I HIT. J. 'cuci iu we uiuut that letter by The You indie >nfidential remember following significant i: Administn ited to me listen. You y 13, 1976. Curry's let vere two may not tw Mr. David things doi would like wanted to ;otally un- vou statec lure. Until should sen your May of apology lance on "I expre d not have should ha\ vith your the way w< as no way Curry's let i that you misinterpr ;ned your tended to < it earlier did not tter, there corresponc t that your would be 1 ised. The such corre letter ap- inflame th s same as (The ca| Isford had nam's not signed the The Game "My la^ against ition with statement* letter oc- "He (M< luring the whole thii 1976. You question tl )ffice and of the lett W& $WmifwM& m iss/cs 'ytle Pn mind >eak to me. W: tepped ffice, and you b ^an the ^ t>n with the remark: s a mistake in sending to President Patterson.' ated that we had to our place as being instudents to whom the ition did not have to i alluded to Dr. George ter as evidence that we ; able to get some of the ne this year that we get done. In addition, I that you thought we d Dr. Patterson a letter 1 11 A. I A sseu uie upiniun uiai we re been more careful in e phrased the letter. Dr. ter indicated that he had eted what we had inconvey. I also said that I believe further lence on this matter wise. I feared that any spondence might further _ e situation." J pitalized "WE" is Putation in the memo, not cock's.) wyer has advised me making any public Putnam said. >sley) was there for the ig, and there was no lat he didn't disapprove er," Wilsford said. i niilWWrt f *> . * " " " '.' : pa f$sley's i j o