University of South Carolina Libraries
I "fjh ; WANWAELOV ! / /V THE WMOLI M ________________ Power struggle Chinese future i It is ironic that the first American to discuss they dc foreign policy with new Chinese Premier Hua China ? Kuo-feng was ex-President Richard Nixon. toward Nixon established friendly relations with the gaining Chinese while he was President and visited the econom People's Republic of China again this year in A sti Marnh rausino nnitp a ctii- in the notinn , n ^v..w ? uvi> ** niv iiuiiun auu piuuaui embarassment in the Ford Administration. The regain feeling across the nation was that Nixon was have be trying to usurp the powers reserved for the Once a President and the Secretary of State. could b While in China, Nixon received the most Until detailed briefing yet of the power struggle nation's between followers of the late Chou En-lai and named the radicals led by Mao's wife, 62-year-old wishes, Chiang Ch'ing. becaus< With the advent of a new leader, depending title, F upon which side of the struggle he or she sup- Party,; ports, previously hostile relations with the designa Soviet Union could be reversed. succeec Mao emphasized Chinese socialism rather Hua'j than Marxism, thus creating conflict with the buther Soviets and some Chinese. Chou's followers approa< oppose Mao's independence from other com- This w< munist nations in order to industrialize the the sov nation and improve commerce. Chou believed view, it China belongs to the Third World. "We should about i enhance our unity with the countries and oeoole Mao Ti A ' 1 " of Asia, Africa and Latin America...," he said, vulner< The Chinese believe that war between the China ? U.S. and the Soviet Union is almost certain, but can ill UJELCOme TO CLftSS. imiA P/ERWL 6E&IM 3Y 6ivii\f6- Vov TVAfl/ //V A the semem requiems booh dm a m w,s , M %V3 cou^e wmm. J ^SM l?mtT~ / \\ on / I \ : % ? rmm/iL. \3LJhi '? i i,.i mill n ~E if lh IN "WE V* f PLATONIC I raci to b q unhappy with their mmUl of collective bar^ J&SF ministration. mm 1 / jjJ Only 23 per cent i millI / / Zj\ I The administrati Will/ ( y believing the adnr ( Fm It seems those j salaries yet are n< iHfciWMOW tively. Criticism o , ?.nn ni ? : ? ? wda at much su mi B issue. L n ^ The question wa [J ?| | || ? \ reflects inapprop " professors were ir cent had no opinioi J fC n \A/ n Whether this in ** ^ w I providing access 1 . . , , . read information i not propose to provoke war between - - - 1 , A, - - - _ :v 6t) per ceni 01 mo ind the superpowers. The movement is invnivp peaceful coexistence, for the purpose of considered to. ground for China in politics and may be a refleCti< ain in relations with the U.S. will fac^t^memterT y come when the Chinese attempt to -L. nnwers the island of Taiwan. Efforts to do so ?, ' f naxtr ^en slow, but continuous, for some time. new leader is established, the pace " ?ee.ms r?1aso1I e quickened and strengthened. dismissing collect! then, internal conflicts will keep the being informed or ? foreign policy in turmoil. Hua was know what the urn permanent Premier according to Mao's J?w eAr in-e! but he has not gained a following summ^rfzedfocul ; of his fence-straddling. Hua's new summarized tacul irst Vice Chairman of the Communist f Instead of coirur is well as the title Premier, now clearly ^ ler ec ite him as the leading candidate to sibil.ty-particula 1 Mao. authority over all c # - mACt A* ? ? view 01 communism is still not clear, w tlIllc nay be more likely to favor a pragmatic <*ny?ne ^r(?m ma^ ch to China's economic development. becomes that we r )uld mean peaceful relations with both our curricula, the iet Union and the U.S. Whatever Hua's ani* Preven^"g si] seems certain he will not be as fanatical .. C? C1. naintaining endless revolution as was tnrougn strikes, ll seems just as certain that Hua will be However, professo ible to suggestions of detente between are Deing treated *nd the Soviet Union, a liaison the U.S. professors at Care afford of collective bargf uwn suuauon. .. r /s bx fecit'b 7D r LensT ~te/V ty TM 0 7M?E Moras. ? v, mmmj/llse /* ams, v ex rims'... ^ /j_?L ^~2T' / t-~;s: i: Si-. iv ?i?r^r-m/? Wlrr - ?Gamecock pinion jlty fails rt rnnin fessors by The Gamecock summer staff iner cent of the professors surveyed were salaries. Yet only 32 per cent were in favor gaining to solve differences with the adfavored unionization of the faculty. ion was regarded favorably, with 54 per cent linictmtinn Hue honn rocrvnnci tn fo/niH? WVXXVIVK 11UU WWII IV/OpVllOlVt IV/ IHV^Ul ly professors surveyed are unhappy with their 3t so unhappy that they will bargain collecf collective bargaining by some individuals tense as to preclude intelligent debate on the C Qol/A/l ?r/\l 1 f Ui^lr 1 1 - 1 0 uonvu, JL/U JfUU U11I1IV 111C univur'siiy uuugei riate priorities?" Answers indicated that 1 the dark about budget information; 36 per 1, 33.8 per cent said yes and 29.7 per cent said idicates that the trustees are negligent in lo ouaget information or professors need to provided is uncertain. What is certain is that se surveyed did not know what to believe, liivlat in academic affairs of the university o much by 48 per cent of the professors. This )n left over from trustee interference in law i. It also may point out the wishes of some to usurp powers usually reserved for the such as punishment of cheating and apfaculty. laoie to assume that many professors are ive bargaining before thinking it through and i their actual situation. If professors do not versity's budget priorities are, how can they rests are being fairly represented? gton College president Gail Thain Parker ty problems in this month's issue of Atlantic, lg to terms with any of the real issues conlucation, those of us in positions of responrly members of the professoriat who claim ^ ?4i ' * limners 01 eaucanonai policy?have spent waging symbolic power struggles to prevent ing decisions about anything. The clearer it leed to re-examine our purposes and delimit more ingenious we are at politicizing issues ibstantive debate." ve bargaining can be detrimental to students ; is not the best means of solving disputes, rs seem to be ignorant of whether or not they fairly by the university. The problem with >lina appears to be fear and ignorance?fear lining and each other and irnorance of their ... MO PfMc ivOA/tfK y. toty COILS? mws fl/Mtr w 6-fiffir bfflwb. I ? ?