University of South Carolina Libraries
opinion Law School faculty makes right decision The Law School faculty's decision to remove from the Law School the 11 students admitted to the school by a special vote of the USC Board of Trustees should come as a surprise to no one. Unfortunately, this decision comes two months too late, although that is not the Law School's fault. When the Board first announced its decision in Sep tember, the Law'School faculty immediately held a special meeting to consider what should be done. The faculty renounced the decision of the Board and stated they would not administer exams or final grades to these students. The faculty later revised this policy when the Board said the students would be dismissed from school if accreditation was endangered. Dismissing these students after two months of school now appears to be unfair to these students, but this is something that should have been done in September. The Law School facfilty made the same decision last week as the Academic Standing Committee made in August. By allowing these students to remain in school, the Board has .now given these students substantial grounds to bring about a law suit against the University. The Law School faculty did not have to dismiss the 11 students from school. The investigation conducted by a team from the American Bar Association (ABA) resulted in a report that stated the Law School faculty must be the ones making the final decision. This is consistent with rules of procedure for approval of law schools by the ABA. The ABA report did not say the 11 students must be dismissed to enable the school to retain its accreditation. Itsimply said the Law School faculty must be the one to r#e that decision. In doing this, the ABA is dictating to the USC Board of Trustees the manner that the Board should handle all future decisions involving admission to the Law School. Admission to the Law School must be determined by the Law School faculty and the Law School only. The Board can only establish general policies that are consistent with the standards set down by the ABA. The Law School faculty made the right decision in dismissing the 11 students from the Law School. If these students were allowed to remain in school, what would happen next year if more students made the same claims these students did. Instead of changing entrance requirements to accommodate the claims of these students, the Board should have launched an in vestigation of these claims. The report filed by tfle ABA also mentioned the "seven per cent rule" that caused much debate last spring between the Law School faculty and the Board. The seven per cent rule enables the Law School Admissions committee to appoint up to seven per cent of the in coming freshman class at the Law School. Originally, however, the Board appointed President Patterson to make these appointments. The report hinted that this may also be a violation of the rules for procedure for approval of law schools by the ABA. The same principle is involved here and the seven per cent rule should be revoked. We have not heard the last of this issue. Lawsuits are in the offing and more bad publicity is in the making for the Board of Trustees and the Law School. But what is most disappointing is that all of this could have been avoided if the Board had not intervened in a matter it had no business meddling in. We hope the Board has learned its lesson. *BASIC TUMMC01C OGnT.0fS am .AND F0 -- Letters to t EDITOR'S NOTE: The cartoon that appeared in the Thursday, Oct. 23 issue of The Gamecock implied that alcoholic beverages are served in the VIP lounge at Williams-firice stadium. The Gamecock has been informed that this practice has been discontinued by head coach James A. Carlen III. Green Street compromise given TO THE EDITOR: For several years there has been much talk and various student actions attempting to close Green Street. The city officials ap parently believe that the closing of this street would be against the best interest of the city and have voted against the proposal. Perhaps there could be some kind of compromise. As long as the problem is ap. proached by both sides from a win lose stance, the solution must yield a winner and a loser. Should the students develop and present a compromise to the city officials you will have created a 'win compromise situation. Such action on the part of the students may encourage ' the city to also com promise. The chances of solving the problem would be excellent because a compromise compromise situation would exist. Anna Hite Leary's column criticized TO THE EDITOR: 'Sports Editor Mark Leary's article on Tom Boewell really k JusT $3.50 AC he Editor sh6wed his Sherlock Holmes' abilities. Who else could have detected all the "bits and pieces" from somewhere in the back pages of the sports section in The Boston Globe newspaper. However, Leary failed to enlighten his readers about the recent article in The Columbia Record's front page sports section. In case your mpgnifying glass was foggy and you couldn't read the article, please allow me to give you some of the highlights. The general manager of the Boston Celtics, Red Auerbach, stated he had no intention ofletting his first round pick go. He also stated that Boswell did have trouble adjusting, which was typical of all young rookies en tering the pro's. It was also stated that Boswell had been scrimmaging with the veterans and "the veterans were giving it to him and he was giving it back to them." Auerbach also said that whoever was going around saying that Boswell was in trouble is full of it. I would like to conclude this by saying people like Leary, people Letters pc The GAMECOCK invites all persons within it and thoughts knw 90 our readesi. It is your 'y weeiy '" OU t.n to We Editor'' sectie prmase, and though lenger letters will be prig Pre""ec**due'o spece reqsuirements. And. it P'eferablv. enters Should be ty,ed,with nan dlvrlter per .nll our Office in Room~ RE. *4 looking for Boswell's failure in the pros, should not count on it. Hope English Gloria Love EDITOR'S NOTE: In his column on Boswell, Leary said he hoped Boswell would make the team, but that he believed his attitude would hurt his chances. Writer attacks senate privileges TO TIlE EDITOR: The Student Senate does not represent the students of the university. The senators represent themselves. Did any of the senators who voted on the bill of senate privilege tickets ask the students how they felt? Why should senators, who are supposed to be students representing students, be given a special seating on the 35-yard line or better? I, for one, do not feel this privilege should exist. I resent the fact of my senator, John Housley, voting down the bill without asking me how I felt about it. He did not ask anybody in the dorm about it. The senate looks out for itself selfishly. Glenn Yearby ley e compus community to make their opinions oice--We are the vehiCle, We attempt to print " *"l let"ers received. Minimal editing ii ted. lenter e of 2~word, and und,, a,,, givn "* hedeCiSOn ot the editors that we not run es for vati reasons. * M"d addrens of the author Included. Please 313 RtusseHi Ianuse or wrt... p,sOpnin