University of South Carolina Libraries
NAN Liberalism BY DAr Guest C Often, conservative arguments on different issues and candidates are intellectually stimulating, but unfortunately something slipped into The Gamecock last week that was neither intellectual nor stimulating and was obviously written by someone to the right of Genghis Khan (paraphrased from that "Prairie Populist" George McGovern.) Really, Mr. Pizzella, I would suggest the next time you write an article you get your information correct, unless, of course, innuendos, half-truths and lies hap pen to be your style. If that be the case, why not move to Spain or Greece. You would be much happier there and among your own kind. As a supporter of Senator McGovern, I feel that sett ing the facts straight is in order, especially after Mr. Pizzella tried so ardently to twist them. First, Sen. McGovern has always supported the Sup reme Court ruling that bussing is Constitutional; that it is a tool to bring about racial integration and equal education. Sen. McGovern emphasized during the entire campaign, that equal education was the real problem to be rectified and took issue with Mr. Nixon's veto of three education bills which would have helped balance the educational system in the United States. Also, Mr. Pizzella, Sen. McGovern's home is in Mary land, now Washington, D. C. Your next stumbling block Mr. Pizzella, was in stat ing that Sen. McGovern's first Tax Reform Proposal was a $1,000 giveaway. In truth it was a tax credit proposal which would have alleviated a great deal of the tax burden from those families earning under $12,000 a year. This same type tax credit plan was incorporated into the finalized Tax Reform Program of Sen. McGovern's platform. Conservatives were strangely silent after the plan was well received by Wall Street Economists. (By the way, where is Mr. Nixon's tax reform plan, or is this another secret?) Your next fatuous remark was calling Sen. McGovern's defense proposals foolhardy. Some of the finest military-minded men in the U. S. put the defense cutback plan together. They included Paul Warnke, former assistant eetaryonf defense, Cliffno-d Alex Ile, NIV 14 44 is not dead 4 TODD >lumnist ander, former member of the National Security Coun cil, Herbert F. York, former director of defense research and engineering, Clark Clifford, former sec retary of defense and Rear Admiral Gene L. Rocque, former Commander of the Sixth Fleet...to name a few. I wudhstt o alayo hsemnfohry simlybecus thyropse to gieAmrcaa adeuat dfene sstm dvoi o wate adiitrto...coenakdtseamqu tion durng teJonsonAdmiistrtio.. anlde tormer mebe ofGvertina curitydoun- l tcil hdbeF.Yok omediecto ofe efeene reser ad inerng, Carlfforo forme asiecno retaryso dene andgh Earetoniwal Gnt but Rocqute forer omoanhde tof te icussedeand.thatnEagleton's meodia hesitat mtcl aunyo ateseionaa fromohrdy adeu.at des syte sudlevoideciwsitoeme AsYor Sn. coens ersistoabny questng ot raecontinutio ofith mpietam ar shdlundterstan adinoistr,then sconverg sed tos sae)es tins urin tme honordmiiratieo.rsiet ou also amntionfed then coen ofaawar,cto siv anohen con atono edio al histhrta firtm int viwr the believed sptoie ens. Agton was aotion onlyuecetn Sen. McGovern couldsha doi quetionl thoul facta betend copld wihew they wre en.ha becase he horaughtio Eagiho wsounfit but htthne issof twoday ad tohe dicussed goenmnta Ealetonk medical reor might turn ramttenoti awyring the issesmat dideIs Sn sounvierndcsotng aortion ing ofthitry esecr. veged, hope tslar)lwl Ituc has bee do tmoe hnredarctifoe o taeden in an gartebieve tlo, be unust Ashinkth iborismni isse,Saen Mnnkoverin bemlieehttisqeto Voice of t Whites unorganized TO THE EDITOR: This article is in response to the article "Colorblind" by Kathy Russ which appeared in the November 13, issue. Kathy, I'm afraid you hit the nail on the head when you stated, "Blacks wish to dominate Whites." It is indeed a shame that blacks were forced into slavery by our white forefathers, but remember, two wrongs never make a right. Unfortunately the "brothers" don't seem to agree with this old adage. As was pointed out in the article "Black Strength" they are indeed out after revenge and ultimately the enslavery of the entire White race. Kathy, quit looking at the situa tion through idealistic eyes. The problem here is clearly defined, surely it is obvious to anyone with any foresight, or intelligence. We are headed for a racial conflict with, perhaps, genocide at it's ultimate goal. In this coming conflict Whites will be at an extreme disadvantage because unlike the blacks the Whites are unorganized, frag mented, and divergent. Whereas the Blacks have identified with their Black culture and are therefore highly centralized with one ideology there are as many differ ent White idealogies as there are White men. It is essential, then, that whites unite. Whites must unite to preserve the race which has throughout history lead the world, both technologically and culturally. You're right, Kathy, when you infer that one race does not have the right to enslave or exterminate another. But, unfortunately, this will happen if White men do not awaken and realize the threat that Black racism has become. White men must united to survive. A P. HILL Whites unite TO THE EDITOR: My dear racial brothers. Before I go on with this epistle, let me make you aware of a very plain fact. You are no longer Americans! Thats right. According to the responses that my letters have had, all Whites are Europeans lost in a foreign land, robbing everyone and everything of dignity, culture, and honor. Well, if we whites who tamed this land, explored, civilized, brought world culture which we Whites created, can't be Americans, than neither can blacks. They are and always will be Africans and they have no place here. White men colonized this wil derness and black men are trying to steal this heritage. I will not hand over a nation that my ancestors died for. Early America was a White America! We are polluting our water, our air, our soil-must we also pollute our's, the founder race? There will never be peaceful coexistence of the races as long as the blacks want revenge and the Whites want self-defense. Only liberal, idealistic, Utopian headed fools can see an environment of racial interaction and bliss. Neither blacks nor Whites want integration. Neither blacks nor Whites want bussing. Just ask anyone. If they tell you they do, rest assured that they are lying. Maybe not consciously, but lying non the less. They don't want equality, they want superior ity. I can honestly say that I don't feel a White man inch for inch and pound for pound is better or worse than a~ black man. However, as long as they remain hostle, I and my col legues will continue a policy of self defense. And it is, after all, only racial self-defense that I expouse. It isn't even the blacks per se who are to blame for this racial cn-. he people flict. It is World Communism! The blacks are being used, probably without knowing, but used none the less. No nation can take the U. S. head on. However, we are like deca dent Rome, rotten and decaying within. Struggles at home make our foreign enemies happy. That is their Grand Strategy. They are using blacks to create racial tension which weakens us from within. World communism is the primary enemy. Racial differences are sec ondary in this respect. White racial brothers. Join the NSFO (National Socialist Fourth World Order). Unite! "In unity .there is strength." Slavery awaits you if you don't act. Read the black rebuttals in the paper and you will see that it is already the eleventh hour. NSFWO, Box 11705, Cola. S. C. 29211. R. LINTON ADMIRAL Scandal sheet TO THE EDITOR: Realizing that it is a perverted form of psuedo-liberalism which leads your editorial writers to behave as they do, I fully expect this letter will not be printed. After all, you would no doubt consider this letter a threat to freedom of THE press just as you have seemingly stopped printing FACTS which tend to be a threat to YOUR biased press. However, I felt compelled to take issue with The Gamecock of November 9, 1972. The 1972 Presidential election occurred only two days before your paper came out, yet your front page blatantly avoided mention of that election or the massive mandate with which the American electorate rejected the candidacy of George McGovern, preferring instead the more stable policies of Richard Nixon. With childish deference to facts which you would rather not have recognized, you placed a curt reference to the election back on page five. Even this was a bit more primitive a reaction than I expected for the Gamecock. Your editorial page, however, was without question the biggest farce of the November 9, 1972 issue (Re "Amerika, you asked for it..."), It was obviously written by a teary eyed embittered McGovern enthusiast whose incapacity to set forth a factual and reasonable argument lay in the fact that he HAD no facts. Moreover, since he would not have been able to present these facts without mentioning a "covey of sleazy whores" and such tripe, he would have reached an intellectual impasse. The "Amerika" editorial has got to be one of the most disgustingly emotional, irrationally presented, bitter and petty attacks ever to be printed under the guise of editorial comment in the Gamecock's his tory.. You cry "gutter politics;" I am charging you with gutter jour nalistics! The author of "Amerika" described himself with his own editorial when he wrote about " a disgusting commentary on the man, his ability, and his tactics". His predictions of the future under the leadership of R ichard Nixon can be rivaled only by those of Madame Charm, palmist extraordinaire. I welcome each new issue of the Gamecock as its pseudo-liberal hilarity is further enhanced by its consistent incompetence. I only regret that through some legal snafu I am helping fund such a "s candal sheet" when I pay my activ ity fees. JIM BLAIR P~reverted fool TO THE EDITOR: Any preverted fool that can't spell America shouldn't be writing an editorial on the expectations of the President Nixon's second term. S. SUNSHINE