Columbia telescope. (Columbia, S.C.) 1819-1821, March 21, 1826, Image 1
COLVMUIA, (S. C.) TUE8DAT PKNWO, MARCH 31, 1688. [MU 13.
> ? ?<?_ ?? J.. . ??? - '
tA- - '111, rfflTMiii
icic gyj
B 1* .T' ' Y i ~ i ??
$tg???
sdplpS
of <{?>Ww* /Jfl
III IIIUI U, I, ii> II ^ I ' I H g
>?? kwirrs
Hfi. I^OVIlE-5 8PKFJCH, ;
V'f?rt Me cOtomifttt of ft* **?/? ?* .Wr. Prmitmu ?
^,,'-^'4^. MiW?Krt4
fttQ
?\iili Mm. Aert <M Wili r^pect lu whM h?d
leajfte, (Mr JSrlflleau) ?? U> the imputation ?u the
*apr*-m.> Com*. >Jtfeh l?? thouxhi ?uoh? pro
-<*din? wouW wup'y- t*" *W no (yie could
"iiUrtaii* ? mor" proliiuod reanaelJUmu br <M A?r'
lb** Individual* who cotnpoaed that anuueot j?
dlratoiy, hat it wej iupoMtblo Ihny -houl'l >i? ?t
be vnriewl?4t, howvrer aneontfWuilfi bla?.?>dto
favor of Uin vmitlpifar let of ?i,u.|.im which
would naturally be m<*t cuugevUtlo Ibc ftuliug*
out of their rotation tofhe federal n*>v
Tliie wai ouly wyU; lh?l )' ? I
?*XJ22J"wL
Maftljf Or prapO**ea?i.in
irtlfoH undcMenduifi to mob refined
Indeed, he had thchigberi authority
i?therbirf (iMiico hiiNM)r, who wa*
lunta^Ni far caudor a?J f?ir*r ?*, aa
?bililMt w m Judge, bad **? on mm
- Sir \V. Sortt, thai howotA he mijrht
_ il to bow to the authority of that TlUe
piu Interpreter of tbe law of u^ion*, It ?|i
pouible uot to (MOettire that hi* mind leauad
' '?*9'' of Iba-aaptora, (*) Mr. Leg* re
it'the detyaiooaof ?Jir ?V. a?-.ott wer*
oboart-afioo. rtl he t??.o <td, r<>u?i>h
U?twi in tin BuglMi Pti** Court, k
? be+i^a lingular cmc If itlu J uot
I.Bal, without dbnntinn lh?
fy or the impartiality of lb* L_
tftfc admitting th* poulbilify the
tow unh lira right* of theriatc*. Ii
yrrceive howjcoo'lab-ntly Witfp
re?<lyJecMrd. they c?utd rclievetlieateteein many
raaet where the rplilt of the pmwtltutien would
\te groealy trtolated. TKcy tutd determined la the
cav? of Fletolier, va. (9 CraiM.li) UvA they
coul.l look no further th*U the laW,and the p..wrr
Of the lawgiver, to enact H uader nnu circum*
ctanuea, end that they bad nothing to do w<lh til*
by tWn Wer? m?Ty two <^uwt(oni that
coot l p??*ihly ariae on it in a C.?ort ef Juilioe:
lit. i! if ;t come within ita txprw powrrc, or fid,
Wo? .t a memii* of e*ccoti|ig any of lU expr??e
f.nwrr?,Alld if wer? %howa to be. In the nature
of f? age,* of e*?noiln* <?? yof iu
powei#, nndef" any rirv?ak?(auofn, or fur tl* ?t
(limiviut of mtty of iU rdijeclt, a Court of Juttiee
rro'jUl >* eofrpeilM togMr* H iUm^lion, all con*
tire <t?atretioa, not of Usat i Iju.licetion.
thui that a writ WO eonatunUoii wm inaJ.
1 that law incbiup
lidb^tosn'y nrno...
ike <4 \kft er^'iinci!, that
ouMthe Supreiu- twin
l we* if uueonitUuifonalf
> ?nci*uraj?ment of
rfed nieiWy to be
. #'-awl'ginO'
.ff*MO<te (t *onii'tirue? nr
?Wmr$ of the jcorervnnetit
i lt at all Unto* rary 10 do
- ? hew late Jo ?ay thih at roniln*
1 of biterprHation, a*?'?t e|>pr?ir?i1 by
1 pbtlelens Itiere la nnth<n^ ?>hirh may
iMrf.be lxWg(i6wit!iiu tho ?%W?p <J fadarel l?^>?
Iriion. ? -
jniimu+WJto cf>n?t|er>iiWHis JC7L?fNT<T7
n dun tied III lh? U>l?rali>| |0 l*? in? tiio*n?.
ly,U??t j?nlrovrf?i???ri.i??x hrtwunrn tw? powJ
?.?, thoolii 1? by ? InUuiMt of Ui? ?r**
4mi?. awl U?* Infix MO <|I ouo uX ll?n?f
fmi
?&>
w?r# only iuktoill?l kin |)ie
* tw..
ui)il?nf>t*<Ily to. Hut lo i? tmk* of
? vfc-UMm of lb) vwnrtiluliojj by (\jMjr*??. (it
" pOWWi"' *7
Hlw ?Iioal<l */ ?ntirrl/ ?nJ
ro* A lrt 4li? ??(?Win?n* gf H.? Mil*
, M ^mUtuoo litwu^lil tb?y wrr?
" *jpyo*<? t!w? 1hu-? ?U<*? ?i??l
' 4m^, ft to *?+
w"
!??. 7k* Kt-li vi> i vf?l
aov%r*to
>.<11 \Jkrfr r i^My .rt ..'r
Wtl rLln* llfMf
?>r .u'j- f t? ?a
<*?d~?h?t ib?y ln?Ml Um matter
i dMi with twly
tied tba^n*o*t
a* in (&?* mt
nwl to ftllqlt
wz
? v?, eneHeinldrI
*?M3$r5K5shrsm
Tlmy seemed to imagine there *u sometime
' ^ ei.d eabali?vc in t?H? very
mystical ?JPvi!( in ttt? eery bltMi It wsv
lpklfll^iNjM^r ? y"*
waHd if governed
?Married upon. limy Ibeg.rf, Onilrcl), ???.?( the
"hy influence," end that
imblic ??|?k?lun j#im l?l att ln?r.
Kor his part, be had not thai faith, either m thr
l?rtMjwuqr ?r< tb cfku; ?en#titu
rioa* ?n4 ? written tow* The oomuqo line,
/.graWae mrMMMna, *o* fullof truth wd wb
uuut. No MiillM.iwwm^vjMiw;m pn?Ml
gation howorfr MMnj MO >11111, however eori
on?, la arrenjin;; tha mililMiry af'chtcb and
Glances?in ?ho?l, oo parchment bani?u and
in..It* &r poWer jartmtever.edald have atoeh preo
dealattacu The tablets of the law might remain
oucOhced, enchengad?but though tha letter were
* h? Do corrupted?It
I- H eftertbe aMl9
Animated and informed H, had A?d. Haw
Was tho lew te he j^At-Mood by the people* Aa
tl*a ?owU aipjuad It, *ajr pallaaw, and to,
the 4|RIMNmi> at the eaert. ware altar all tha
law itself, far k must he admitted (hat It came to
that In effect. Now, there was ao mean* of eS
tending the powers of a government halt *u elfco
tnal a* a tribunal to aanound the cunatitetion In
?ts tfcvor, and tb kUdity and seal ita neu. with
whatever m a* venerable and lm(?>?io^ !?* the name
a ad the lum?? and authority of tow. Xbua wM
Irumvtbbg la tho adherroea to iMCcdeutt, and
the eftttadlef thereinbf the"era, which weaex>
ceedingly favorable to tha aitout ptMru*, nad
[Ultimately to the Arm gpfrilafefceal ?t aa opin
ion or a aydem. The argument of a lawyer
la, that whatever Ime been done and acquiesced
in, to good taw. Bo that one errar natural\y en
gendere another?one act of usurpation become
at once tkeofigia and tha jtutifieation ot a thou
laand mora. 'I hi* opinion was conft. m? J by the
hiatorjr of aoDae of the tao?t momentous rpvol'i
tiona that bad ever occurred in lb* political opin
ion! of maahind. What was the reined/? The
intelligence ui dio peo| le, the diAWiori ?f know
ledge, tho fraquehey of public di?au?*ion a|ma
fundainetal doeoinea. iioverameiil* ought, ac
cording to a saying of (he Cnt of political wri
ters, Mnccliiuvcili, which had become a maaiia
'among ?tate*n*ee, to be frequently broogbt back
tuihelr Irat principles. I low wa? this to U done?
By walcbfulncas. by j.id.*ur, hy dialrtict, and
egalu hy nvUiodbeMMQf). Indeed, ha h?ugkt
thy maui, if not the only advantage of a written
constitution, to a?, that being more prccitn, an.I ft
he might say to. nmto romped, :1m u a I tody
ol unwritten law, afery particular net. of
usurpation, every naooeat and inchoato vndatiou
suspected, and
tho darkness,
iutcioiieebto
>aguensm>f what i* ralfod common U w. To ap
ply this taanmiag. ta a ease; supjtoeo Ibe hew
atgumcnt on iute*nal iroiir.veiweul, he meant that
Which UuOAcd an oulj.i itadjpnurypriation ot dp
nay, merTTy as money. 10 \#n jJit puae, larww, a*
It already had uwt In *.waw (Mrtiof the United
Stat re in e certain other difertioo T-and ?Ningre*?
to act upon it?and iha state* to ro?i?t, as reaist
they must, %nd abouM, and would. What wonlJ
be vatd some half centary lieuce ?u, f*u4ng thing*
to go on to tfceir ptresaut Uela? You ere cnistin^
Whet? i<ut as comtitulkMVd, a?j mhni y.m U*v.
before over and over snlimated to, end yy&
uft rebel* end traitor*?eed he and no dunhiadjdr
language woald ere long And an echo in irnvfy e
?uiiiotliali?uol ye4 prepared loadnfilltamtrrcctneis,
?All this appeared to bun tdaia and *iiu)4? ou?>agti
to reeommend it?elf, without the rnpport of any
aathority, (o (h^ common rextae u| aMnktnd-?
trot he wqold u jw cite them .a paisa^e of tlie
federalist Irotfi which it woald clearly attftonf.
rW not ooSy wwa *Uch remnnitraucei ot aUle to
aULM4r?> auht lixtuit--not only not Bp.Jmn of in
the' fao^agc of dimppro^atinn, net uctnalty pqjipt
edouta* a naturwl eorier.tira?Iht tit incdrtltrU
of the gnvurnmfiit^n* a menu* on ubleb thr
peofl* might tefurely roly lor preventing tbekf,
croeehmonts of the federal authoritiesaJMH
Mr !.. trad the pa?*egn of the fodprdU V0|. I,
II 32a) TUIs pawaga of tha (Aetalid u u equnl
ly *tro:ig and explk'H?lh<^ wason mial'akiug it*
megnlnf, ther- was lit redUtng it* forn-, ani
nothing appeared to him more naqur?ti<?i.ii '?
than tho wftdoht and good srnseof the view* It
implMd of Urn ckcoks?n?t on p?p*r. hnl in /lei
and of prmrtirt ? neeewery to tha hJtminnioe* ??l
well betanedd operation of a faderatlve syrieui,
on ipwavw^rt ai pari/ cifnclude the argemmt
onthUhaad; he *?id H wn* manif? *t from p^eel
tdeo ? H ^vas^oeformabie to th? eondnet ?>t tlte
Colonial Aiaemhtif* of till* country?it h^d ocen
taken for granted in the uniform practic* of,
the lx>gt*later?** *iftcr the adoMion of the l omthu
tlon, mid badpro.hirrj th<> menM?rjblr rrvolotmn
lif ?II #ne' **n**na^.?s a., el**. ???? 1^.1? I
ii>ur|Mmofi, c%crj u?n?ai?im nicnc
of Ma princi|deo, was mora rea^dy ?<
ex|?osed than tl' they lay. hkld n in
or ware lest in the hidcAotte and
""?'J ??? ?f??
?ucli * e6rrm?H>nt?It ?u ???*!?? I" I W? r**ff
Id** of liiH.rty?U)?t the nrpr*#?iiUtiVM af lb?
|KO|)te of Hk dtmil.t u4 eiarefoe
?rhen#\ rr U?nr? w?? oluroccuioa.thr rt^bt trhtab
?riil|?tn#ii d?atad theW ?? . ?
lint,?rtM <h*y, hhut It th" t,ret?\on on*' What
Im? b?rn doa*' Hmr mold tho?* ywittow b*
aft?r Um> nr Mdeiit* ahtwja l?ea? Uid
on llirlr inbtcpf W?? ?H*re ?,w of ??? P*T
IWH "f ctrll *aeldty fh?t laid not Main"*!
la Ifcat |Mipar, a* Maon* th? 40n?titu<k?n?1 abjjM*
?if Maul ?Mlj (>,? npo|vr ol'jo l?of
?n *oligt?Mw??d pol?oy? 4nd, ltr?td"?, hiwl atd
Connrrw implicitly dretdvdtH* M !?????.
fully tlUroM^d it, Mfa H pa?v?l artwt wa??ui|leti
aa?i f?ry la?tty ???'.?? d, ?H? tnt?raal i*ii>mvata?Ht
wNf ANMm4 Rut iH* rdrUi^rrf argtunanl w M?
friend, Mr. M'!>?<!>, l?xn r'??t?Mrwd ,|*alalv?
of tint Hi arfttwrat Hhtrh a??t amy
?r*nt Ml# f)i? ,Hi <?),> of that Ia?a?ar?, ImM
Mr. I'- IhadfVit, nt ?? many ia??a *4 I|d> uiia,w
at mnfmiU r kind a? it ila><dd|d%JM L'*ng'<** lit
it* wfclom to uitir 4'?
t sin t*"a?#dt?f to c?f>rdrr |lii? H>r?nd |Hrf of
tha id^iif, Mr. l^yiN remarked, iaM fta
|if*Mat ?trt.? M Uw tantweny i
^fCdliWi In ?n?b*rl?H*
m U ln:?*n?l hB^tv?#nH>?t, tto
<M Wat worth <ia*w?riug w?t
nMva
would be co^eedaJ it <1 u M aattefae MM -m
a c?| of inevitable ?re?s?iiy--e.#i[>ad might be
ofwned for lli? paaaaya of ?| army, or for coo
veyiug lh? omil, (for M was trilliog (o allow that
?aeb lliur? ?p*K?H teriy bet, aad h? hod uo
reiiab whatever for On verbal criticism as to the
difference between "aukinj* ?ml ??tttabJitMlu*,"
kc. iic.) cu4il<l it l?e gravely prrlanded that Um
'ffiwfiinwut or the United JMm bad a right to
tuiaiilrmiott a rleoert*eul unknown to, and In
with. lU pnfi??al orpnlanilon, ha
meant .that of "/be abort, lo do
wbnieV ?r a liberal | ?
XSti
dutrive lo the prosperity of tW? wbnle?
C^nnli for noimnrruial purpart.. A grail.! ?
Mlu(*v.ial iuipruttjaaets by pest romfsl Wat
"?? ever ?)ch ao alMMj* of b?|?i|t, be woeld
oA k^ V '' A" Uj,u'1 c#mwwo ?*"*? of
Ua (Immi slit u r.tlM to I bo attain pt to deduae
tlU power lo iiuetfioa bum tba light to rvgulal*
jfldbUaeue, bikI tho p^c%of building light
houses, aeJ of pro riding beacons and buoys for
"? ~~'^Meeillteo, nod lately
most captivating and
at bat a right to ap
arged, by Alexander Hamilton, aud lately
J to tlx puhlfc., hfe ^ ""
htm, t?Mrt Coagrtu ?
inowy, merely as money, to any objects
uj iy drrin conduaiva to *be commoo
and genera) welfare," W*? of a very different
diameter. ||e had ne*er known one mora tri
uinpheat hi lit result* and although ho had him*
self always regarded it aa amoved, he would not
aedertake to any that h? should be successful in
exposing the I alloc y of it it| a manner that would
bo rtjoaliy satisfactory to otbom
This area meet, be mid, was that Ibe govern
ment ureded no dWUect, sjienflc power (<<r tba
execuiion oi these prtjsch, |uo?murh aa M would
not take part iu I It bin as a political severolgftlv,
Imt on the rame footing ?? private in TK ideals, vbe
by rontrl.utin* tho fead eeceamry to accomplish
them. TboanToads, H was eot>tmd*-d, it had an
nndouhtod and unlimited right tu rsus by any
??irt ot and when once mi*.I, to ap
pi o| trial e to whatever objects K slioold deem
most roiidamve ha Ota general weilore. It was
conceded. liOM-rvtw* and, Mr. L. laid, tho concet
? u >s a very iffcportaetone, that them ol.j. eta
ought to be '?/inlUimmT in conti?<'.i?tu?ction to
?Ome?lia I'tmlil not my exactly what?that went
not national. Udt on the other band, it was con
ptfuJed that tn?* ?w.?rd? "tommyn defence nod
gtiioril wa>l4iv, ui^b rendered it occi?mry to
nub* tbal r<?f*-miot, wera mtriciirt of what
woukl olhrf kvnariiavf baaa wholly unlimited?to
wlt,.the |k>wih oT i.-rying tains, and dbpoting of
ravanoe. {,
To begin wkb H?b awecpm^ propr.uUoa, that
Congrvif bad a u:M. or as geatlixnoa would rn
tber 'Xpress it, /,v tr, lolaV) ui<-s.n|>mi tbapeo
pta lor any purix><* wbatsoetei, or for no pot'
pom nt all. and smt of ' sheer wantooof** and
enpriee. It ihev eontoundad (>ower with impu
nity, orregaoird a power to avmWandto violate
the eonstiiutbm, without being liable to ksare ks
act* dtfeated and annuUod by a court ol Jostiee,
[w n power to esv<Mt* tbe porpoma of tbacontfi
tuthm, tlta patnd.li would be indeed explained, al
though eertainly uot estaldiahcd, fc* ibe Kapreme
ore of tba biod alluded to. Oat in his way o( Con
Mg^^teMaobJect^whlcb suited a bmp not
si?v? not vatjr wp*Mn of refining,
iHjr In nsa:ti-n of >ua|i aprnctionl natero?
ly tba gp*N>min?:iit of tba United Spates?
U a very limited govantmcnl?but noodiei
laent??K? f?nct.ooa#^ao trustee, ooul'l
i^erlyheml to have a power to do what was
? violation of tho true tpisft ?r>l latent oT his
authority and uwtreciiona.. ? Take tho eery
ease la ipsfetien. A-lm!t ? fur a momenl that
Congress luM aa ealiwited iioner.tu 1? the
|?u|de wf the Unite 1 States for the aoeomplkh
mem of bean JUU n*it?n*t purposoa?-would
U have x right lo nbue- thai power, hecnuse H
was uullmiteu, and dmrf it to eMmr enJs? Are
aot tho rf M trail an asseatial part of it,
?ad, as botween the a^nt end bis constituents,
Has it ever heard of lt? a court of equity?area
it consistent with any lutiodSsf ju*lce. or any
(V Incjple of botnmoa. seise, ibtt a |*ower to rabe
aad dispose of whatovc ?:?W money might bo.
anceuaif to effect e citain specified purpose,
would auihnrtaetho ?j/pvolriatl>n of tiie fund to
M itUi a dilTerant, perhi;-t an opposite purpose?
It follow^l, theWorc, tla? tha friendi of intenml
improvement were not i Ivnaead one Jot la the
argument, uv?a b> the hypotbrtienl aoncasston
U?a' Congress does poses?tl "
despotic right oftayti<u whl
? the uaqoanded and
rbtSt tbe/-claimed for
Rut. Mr. L. laid. In A -nied tbot Con^rao* or
that any other ^?*ari?iwnt po?ar??*d ouy ?ueb
rifhl; at kit* tu lh? a^nt to whkU eantfrmen
wbWlo puah it. TattU. nmono of Umhlghett
tUribntMuf M>vrr?ij>iiy-nna of thn?e imtiwn
dental |>r?*Msrai>vc?f wth which a body politic.
*?? inreuad fur |.romm in- the jrNt UnUwh of
the Community, <i *V't<*r tb the in
lennt uftba individoa. It WMfcuimnnwtii of
what (Hthlickla caIIoi ?h? emit* 4?*mIn: (hut
I* to my, Hi plain RnlV.h,th?i will of the majoH
ly and t|m right of Ui *? onfeat-.fo w?,u hod
tmeii ?W l.rlurr, tahng aw ay from the ell ton ?
imrt of h.aproparty(iti<l awtropflMlaf it fo pub
lic purpi*#., And ?*4- root* justify Ibat in
i.iy citkv. hut nwwti'jr or rrant And OMnifrat
utdily. And ?vn? w'li thi* qaaliAnation, it *?? a
jrfwor i>t onra <>f ?rti va4 Htportanw, and to
t-a*Uy I '? ?? ?*??t in Ml (r?o ooun
tlirt 4 wua laid undr tim jff?'n?o$t mttnilnta, nif 1
w<tf heJ with* mo?Mi?i?MN viyifanca. Arbitrary
taxation bud ocaftinvd moat of tbo political
r**??lt??i.>n of mod** lint**, (r6m Magna Cliarta
ilnwn to flw drtlirliM of American indap*-n
d'nca, and nut Inn mrk>rt?rd him iO<H? limn to
i<-ar H taftfrd of, inlhU r ..m?rf<ol all others, a?
a tlun^ uf i n.r.rv in ?t:rr ol no sort of HUMlWI
?n |?Mtiilntf to It mad lo any ?jwwol?t?<)o
?b ranc?*d?? I rtfl?<and an eiaptantcgy |?1naJitle.
0?ntt*m?n w^koff ta*i?i I ha pfcopb* to thotr
laat fbiltlons MI ?ra? |HM??ct1y I* tb* order oC
aociety tw 4? #? ?f ?"f trio* annld jomify
?neb a wtanawrv, (Which a ai? <?*.?re ?.n?ld li? Ima
gined; Imt a noc# Ity ?* ?*?? U ^ooW nM
Into, and imply aU'->lut?oti nf Um whole torn*
and nonMUution ? a gnvrrameql. vrnturad
to ?ay, tbat tha f?nd Curb aNNld ba Obliged l.?
tbcin |on-?o?hh? In'OHr iwalerood,
for ha beli/ved |liH wn b '
jL
MHoa of Iba oodaW'#* ?*f that I
Ikeb^adof yfeortnMltol
TfUf fldnf(l*?, w? W*
power lo
thoae words >ad aotbeea there, and the
jlvea without
pitad. what bed bean tbe rW
Ihavebceat
levy Mwludbw* given without u;
of Ibeeli^eUts which they should
? ? _ _ its of inmcrtt . ?
to other pert* eTtha ooaaUtutkm. TM.it
* that Congress woald liiv?tod ? right to
iKXwylallat way, jo pey iktMHof ilw
I Suites, and to provide for tbe opmmoe
to ami pMfil totflm. which M would of
ooars* do, b> H^fcottoK lu whole IrasU, ?od pN^
oaey to that way, to pey tbe
States, and to provide for fi
i and mMW Welfare, which
? do, bj footing |U Whole tni |
tonatuayatj ha duties; tor what WM th? very end
and object of the coafadara'ton bat to promote
the oomaon duenna w4 geoeral wHf
? (kHatfMiA II f. I. tnr~iis Intlinf
t4|rr?<nf Mrvn y*c ?nraiH HWti
hod ao thoae wander working word* t
working word* teamed to
hi to be,after all, o???o aorplusnaa**-. .. . ? ?
Mi* friend, however, had taken e vary different
vtow af this subject. Proceeding oo the eirena
w? satiposition, that an unlimited (lower to do
one thing. amounted to an unlimited power to do
aad that tbe neai ofralriag money
I, bad no conneaioa with the end* ft
wna Intended to accompli*, at tonal bom ne pro
portion of them in eateat, lie regarded the wonle
'^general w<l/ort" u restrictive of no otherwise
untiuiUed grant,aa an eacv-pttoa thai proved the
rale. Tbea,la return for n coaqes*lon *o liberal
andanexpacted, beoai/claimed to aiake the amst
of the |HX?r remnant ot -power wbicL hiescnipu
Uaujustiee bad left bim. la abort, bU Wen* tw
pnaltioa was, that wbjle all 9lh*r aseau* n
mty and proper for eircutlng tbe raui?*rBte.l
Eer? el the federal government, were limited
he aatare ef those power*, tbe levying and
oping of money, the universal aaeana, wna
restrained ooly by ibia cond.lioa, that it tbould
j not be thrown into tbe tea, or bestowed npoa in*
I dividual* who bad no alalui oa tbe pablk, tor.
uut should ha (airly laid out in any way that
would contribute lo promot* the general welfare
Ai to the idea thai (Jiese words were restric
tive, he thought it dear, a* had already been re
marked, that ware they obliterated, it would
neither increase nor diminish the power of Coo
tfraes, to raise ai much mooey bj U teflon at migbt
be aeeaamry tor tbe purposes of tbe Union?-but,
in foot* the argument on tbe other side, involved
n palpable toeeathtcoey. which had struck him
at tho first view ot it, aad which be bad pointed
OOt to hie-friend In a cuuveisaUontbey bad had oa
the subtest. It wna admitted by the advocate*
of the aystoa^ that they had no right, under that
nnmrn phone -general welfare,* to appropriate
money tvpnrtUuUr or private object# Which tho
btgli |irerug?uve* of a governiutut of n very limit
ed-c a tent and of enumerated power*, would other
wise, it Meap, hare enabled Utem to do! ty"?
own-dtbatthetfaaeuryoflbf nation, the copiuf
norsbip fund, was fairly liable only far naif n*I
dubtt and oootracU. HpW, Mr. liegare Mid bp
would txi glad I bet tto^" who were ?o fand of
M-ttlio^ principle* and working by svslein, would
be obliging er.ou^h to define wjbd Ihejf meant by
a naffaeet otyect. lie knew what It* author of
tbe anromeat be was endeavouring to refute,
meant by it, lie had beard him say that there
were vory tow underurtcmii of the Mad, that Ac
Zbotti i?|nm?ai aa aODUod i? ?*?* ? ?esltotlmt
llut tbe qnestioa was, not what ha wfafced to
move, hat what bis argaaeft to Mot pr./ves,
if it prove* any tbifig at all. The notion area,
that the power bt appropriatis* mouey, waa not
limited to those cetav ir- wlitoh It is nooesternary
a* n means of eaecuting any of tbe other powers of
the govemmeoU.XhLhlr. B. coureived ft to bo;J
bat that it weal beyond that, aad yet was not nU
topKtmr iadfllaite aad eircumMrihed. Within
whnt imaginary limit* ?withli what ideal a one.
Its erbit was'to be finofined, was the problem
whk V he though it so dMkaK to solta. Accord
ing to his theory^ those Were national owlets
which the Constifetba had oenfarred U|>on Con
gram powers to aecomplbh- - which the state*had
covenanted with each other to n^cfmrVsh aa a,
isaftoo. With unity of jmrjpese, of means and qf
interest. As to arar and peace, for ejumpto,
tr.l, and acoor
r - _ , ^ rameat of war,
pttoa or of what degfeee ef Impor
they aright be aahl lo be coosotoUtnd, aoJ
dingly every prrparaOoa and t art ra meat
of Wb4t dasrrrpttoa or of what degree* ?f
tanca*eever waa astrictly national ohJ*<t. Tl?e
nt paltry, distant, and (isolateJ tort f?.>m tbe
ttors, was at mueb a matter of common de
fence, aa the whefe navy, or Ibe whole army.
Whyf Because fcvery State la. equally interested
to prevtolingevils,whieb all m# equally bonnd lo
ene<Minter end to sarinta--?beca?sn ft is oho' of
tbeee partijalirs, to which they are inaeperably
jninml together by - mttnhl tongue, united
thoughts and counsels,equal hope, and hsanr.1 in
lb* glorious eaterjrtoo." Bat whan he heard cor
tela ot^ect cnltoa aaltoaat, which did not come
within the enumeration mmto to tbe erranant of
tbeVoton-^whloh we roarer and nbayelheseaa to
which these Jndepeadep|.8tM<e? had airaed to
*idrr themselves a* one nation, Me. f>gare own
ed, ha did aot ?ppreliend the alaaaingaf the
IT wonM M ropflfrt, thnt the r orkf
alluded |o, ?Ithoogh not fooling within the aoope
of any?{ Uit iMIWttd poweo of CoR(m>law|
m? not etrfctly MlioMl la tWr character, would
r*i btcoo* to bw thtir umi?r that particu
lar elaOre,pmrided th?y wm fairly MkoliM to
promoto the -*eoer*| wehare." Thoa a caoal
uniting two (jroat aectinm of tho eounVy add l*a
nttini aw? Stat<a,ilth<.i|li it ?M not a w
that dlreetly intoreated the nation oa a nation.
work
?(ill
froea ita grea' importance might doaarra tho ap?
nolle! >on of a'tloqel. But that not iou, he tald, led
leiatodiMely tnaconclndon tontrary to tho by
lftk#qnofUon, whether on object WM
or am* pot courtatrd with the n*Uem|ot fefler
III welfare, waa to bo doei< led by reforaape not ic
any deecriptlon io the CJonatitutinn, bat Merely le
ridels he a?ked again, what wnrk? Would not t?
national i'or lea Unco, if Booth Carolina wonU.
M a port of thia noUqo bo cpaddyad w bMeflM
by a CMMil which abonld
mern Statef from bor%ebite*, tq
peak* Bay. mttL jajMofc w.
trawoly iejarWvSToW>
that k Lei eooId ho called ni
tnf fo Ut *?mj)
and injory Ion
try wonM fatal
the iu>< annolnaioo o?tt
eoenal ft out tho
accofdiog to ibi
Oigroti.fori
11^ ^ ^0e J
kT<>?! ?
fmlnljrjrfi
la udMr words, there Is nol a eeeak or n ???
road, In ??jf Suit, tbac ConcrmhM ?<? Cm.
fjffljnnal power V t?k? uwkr lu aeperinte* i
dcoceaedrbf*-.acoocluston*?irely at varteeee
with tha condition impoeod*ftoo Uus ?no?? ap
propriating power, area by the Mt afcenuo.u
advocates of (Im system, bat which be defied ?
them, with all their acumen to reeiat or tocrede.
II*thought Mm rrJuMi?H ?* <MwdI the
?*?*? argument. \fn.t then WuthtM rctof
cnoef Nutlet ittry iraprureaiciit. be partial
ei|wnditurea of money, k e national ohject^-bet
that nana nrr, however general the bculti ttnjr
oonfor? not tf twenty Kpmofilsif twenty four
profit by Ibem, for tajMtke would ha done to'
those (pur?not if aU too States profit br tbepi.
Car a violation of theconatMfeion can nartrnn oma
other than reflation of It bjr any thing ex p#K/?/o
? S, ofttf Mi Ml rMWh tT
doca the and. in thl*.?o sore than lnnoyelty| I
or case ooasctraia flm weans.
Othar con?iderMion< of? more practical natnra
mi*bt b? added, but Mr. Iwr* thoafht that II
was enough to hare ipet, anTaa ha ho;>?d refutfc} 4
tha triumphant argument oflha friends of the pow?
*r. Ha had aodenbt but tha eyatem would go on ,
?ha thought opputia ?to projeefk oa every ac
count, so dateline andatiractifr. Would l?finrv? v
or nnava ling. Tint ha fclt tha iutereit of the '
Souifc, end etftcially of South-Carolina too keen)
iy?1m wa? two strongly persuaded that tha prin
ciples be edvociated Were abcoluteiy neueamrydo
" ' prosperity and nfrtjr?A anrrander at dh
on,and snnaalt without a murmur]
fa) Bl.Comm. K Uf .42, StvertifmlfnJU)
guUtitn art nnreriibtt Itrm?. \x. /W 4i ' I
Wft/4tmn'$ KttmtHh, 8w tfl, p. ?d . I
(b) Stt IVmrt, M. ffjrtten, 8 Da'A. Xtt, yvChnte,
J.nndSIWf.afifi.
fTutdifum Om. a/ JurtswruJtnrt, 88.
(a) In lit cm# a/ Me FmoI, SrA (,>eart, ??.
from (As RithmmU Compiier.
Mraiat. KniToap?1 do not kaow If the follow*
Ing correction of n frequent end uommon errrfr
he worth mucin and yet ll Is always m little better
to be right then wrong In almost any thing. The
name of the dtoliucuithrd man who la emphatic
ally atyled the Liberator of South-America, la of*
ten pronounced, and I hope will loag b? ao with
reaped and reeasotton, by erery friend of Ifber
ty ?Bui It U generally pronounoed wrong. It h
accented en the Arit syllable, when ll abould be
on ll>e screed, with tlie sound of the i like e ton*
The correct accent and aound are Boles rar, and
nolMe/irar. The capital of Colombia also Is Bo
goto, nod the town irbefp the Congress of South.
America ia now iaecarfon, ia Panama; both ahonld
be accented on the laat aytle^Kand the aound St
tbe o et the e?d of them, U like the ae?*d of efe
fitlhtf. r
I tew in woe of the publle papera, aot long
aince,direct ion* far pronouncing the name of llur
biec. Hie uame h property pronnnced In fn*t
ayllablcM l iur irr-dc?recent on the last avlla.
ble but one, and> like c lung.
ORAMM ATICI.'R*
frM tk? Timet.,
SINGULAR ClSi OF CRlM. COS.
k trim, caa. dn?a??id in tbe titled world, to
i
tSTto^r t?So?T SkMltar toW
~~lft-h|niaMMi| * " ~ '
" jl thM
Ho thoin
it
tol
?, aft Wit period, bad never MW hie
?to k*, and curimlty fodhhatobe
?...Wp?- her,*Ui,la eed btholJ! b? felt in
laea arlth b?r himwlf. aad Immediately ofcred
her hie band! ll?? nephew baa only a title ami %
comatfoeion I* (be gnarde to depend oc, th? Mala
had ? tape gfor title?and Mim ?M/)00 per annum.
Difference w*a of no very email laapnr
2SS"J5 <KXES ,!?*!? 83*123
vOO PrOTOHwU ?OfvBU Iwi In A IC
appear* ha bad completed tbe terme of hl? in
men! aad eoaia home. The #ade, it ?erm?,
bat rrlub hknppearaoca, aadrefueed to ?
dmterm* of lotiaaae* into 1* *mily. I
of (iota a eon was bora to (ha aged pc
newed, ctoeaf than before, Wbiapet* began
circalata of eeneeqoeaoe to I Ha iM peer; It w
to
J heir,
inn WW www ??! I ?^| ""?? "" "?? la Tea
bridge for her health, and reeided wider the mat
of ber aaal, ford lodged hi the loan aa
^TheeTuSag* eat the old maa on the alert?If?
found, to Ida aorrow, Ma emtefaram fo
known, the ol<\ s?Mtaa?an preferred daepieg in
a troah bad In h> librarf, tobertdi,,g ?Hb e 7<*ag
eodl.looming wtf*. A plea area iurt la eare*.
ilea, end hie lordriilp W? detect id la the lady**
bedchamber. lie had oo anae wbefewKh to da
fead btaiealf; and hb nac|?, aJMeted bf a reeer
end dtvlne, aad a poa?e af eerveou pw?aa>M t"
elect Um vi al efbUaid actually threw Mai dear
Tbahooeaeiawvd tfiensapfdledhidl w?? ? po^ar.
andet ibanndadeeeended with I# pMaa?,t.?
bia trtellm, ha levelled tha pane* I.