Historical Newspapers of South Carolina

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

f%f ooliubman nfe Statfbnni The Sumter Watchman wai found? ed in 1850 und the True Southron in IIIS. The Watchman and Southron now has the combined circulation and Influence cf both of the old papers, and is manifestly the best advertising medium in Sumter. Our <?ld frbuul, A. C. Jones, of Newberry. the man who leaped into notoriety a few years ago by an? nouncing himself a candidate for th-' United States senate In opposition to B. R. Tilllman. has written all the way from New York to settle the Brunson-Teatherstone controversy. He says that Jones knows all about prohibition politics, that Feather stone is all right, that Chris Is the candy kid. and that Joel E. Brunsen Is all wrong, that he has a grouch and don't know where hurts him? or words to that effect. ? ? ? Mr. Brunson's excellent memory and hie (letter file haw turned the laugh on the Rev. Louis J. Bris tow, whose political activities over? shadow his religious zeal. A well stocked letter file is as deadly a weapon as the jaw-bone of an ass. ? ? ? President Taft's pronouncement in favor of a further revision of the tariff is the first move in another bunco campaign, but the country having so recently been treated to an exhibition of tariff revision by and for the trusts the common peo? ple who bear the burdens and receive none of the benefits should be slight? ly suspicious of any revision propo? sition emanating from Taft and his coterie. ? ? ? Mr. Belser's good roads plan eee/i-i It have unsuspected elements Sj anpularlty and meets with a fa? vorable reception where opposition, or Indifference, was anticipated. It is a business proposition and the people who have heard him explain his plan and the ways and means of financing it are giving it serious consideration. When a successful business man makes a business proposition and talks it in terms of dollars and cents he gets an at? tentive hearing. We are now more hopeful of Sumter county obtaining a complete system of good roads than ever before. a a e Two years ago there were 2,00* votes cast in the first primary elect tion in Sumter county, and it is reasonable to suppose that the vote this year will be equally as ' large. The candidates and their friends can figure on this basis, at any rate, and some curious Juggling with fig? ures || being done. One McLeod man ventured the guess the other day that his candidate would receive 1,800 votes in Sumter county?we hope so. but don't believe it. A Feather ston. -uippofftaf says his man will get lf|| i in this county?we don't believe that either. A Blease man says that the Mayor of Newberry will receive not less than 500 votes In Sumt* r?perhaps so. but it is not probable. Two years ago Blease re? ceived 543 votes against 1.437 for Ansel In this county; four years ago Blease got 99 votes; Ansel, 278; Brunen. 327; Edwards. 2; Jones, 5; Manning?. ItHlj McMahon, 111 Sloan. 23 out of a total of 1,777. With these figures as a basis for a guess it looks like McLeod should re? ceive a safe majority of the votes cast with the balance of the votes du id I betw? ? n IVatherstone, Blease and Richards, or Hyatt in the order nam-1 ? ? ? W.- have been asked to give the \ot?> fat < in lldates for State Senate four years ago. and for the candi? dates f?>r the House four and two years ago. Th ? otflclal figures are as follows: Ifti?K?r the Senate: Clifton. ?79; Handers. 782; for tho House, Danen. ??,37. nick. 1342. Dom. 719; Km- r, l.OsJ; M- F.lveen. m; Moses. |gji] Wi O. Stubbs. 735. 1908?For the House: Cuttlno, 829; Pahna, 1.015; Matt 1.^.78; ' ? r. 1.821; C. K Stubbs. 1.063. ? ? ? The attitude of the average State? wide prohibitionist toward local op Haa would be funny were It not for their deadly and Illogical earnest? ness. As we diagnose their attitude. It is that lo.-ai option Is an excellent thing so long as It results In prohibi? tion, t ut a covenant with death nnd an i rr ? merit with hell If a majority of the fMM.pl,. of anv countv declare against prohibition. ? ? ? If our State-wide Irlends will tell ?I how they v. Ill enforce prohibition in aaaatlea that voted asjnlnat pro? hibition under the local option law. we will take aiore vto< k in their de? in, i ml for a State-wlile law. It Is I biir ia ssouee g aoanlaal eaf ?ren? ne ?it of prohibition in counties .i >t it v v ?ted for it, an 1 if the gate dependant ? for the sa> fefcenseat af the law was those who eased for prohibition, there would be ? n gtagi Majfjat than theft is now, in the dry counties. In Sumter coun? ty, for Instance, the suppression of Mind tigers has been due, as mueh to the efforts and influences of th^ law abiding citizens who voted against prohibition in the election last sum mc r, as to the efforts of the un? compromising prohibitionists who Voted to abolish the county dispen? sary. Law is nothing more than crystal isod public sentiment, and every law that has not common sens.' to r. commend It and public senti? ment to enforce it. cannot be made even nominally effective. I ? s But fOF the fact that Tammany is no better than the Republican ma? chine, the Democrats of New York would have an opportunity to capture that State as the result of the light R w it Is making on the regular organization. s a s ? If Mr. Lever Is a Republican be? cause he voted foi a tariff on lumber, what are the other forty-one mem? bers of the House, and the seventeen Senators, who voted with him? Champ Clark, the leader, and Sena? tor Tillman both say Lever is still a Democrat In good standing, and that his vote on lumber did not make him a traitor to the party, and their opinion is entitled to as much weight as the dictum of any other Democrat who volunteers to construe the party rules and lay down the law to the rank and file. Mr. l,evcr ana tue Platiorm. If the Democratic party or any other party is "to do business" it must move in a straight line. Some authority must point its course. That authority lb the national convention and the platform is the chart it pre? pares. If Congressman Lever is justified in kicking out of traces in respect to the lumber schedule, Doe, Roe Dick, Tom and Harry, from this, that and the other district and State, are equally justified In voting against the party programme according as whim or Interest may dictate. To vote against free lumber would be undemocratic irrespective of plat? forms because It would be out of harmony with the traditional Demo? cratic tariff position. To vote against it In defiance of a specific platform declaration is an overt act of down? right treason against the Democra? tic party. If the Democrats of the district prepared to grant Mr. Lever an dulgence to vote with the party against it as suits his humor, th must be prepared to pardon any ; all violations of platform pledges and to hold themselves responsible for consequent party defeat. The contention that the party plat? form may be Ignored at pleasure in? sults Intelligence. A political party must have something to steer by? when its platform Is abandoned, there is nothing left.?The State. LEVER'S LUMBER VOTE. Whut Senator Tillman Has to Say About It. The following latters are printed by Congressman Lever in the Oranrje burg Sun: Lexington, S. C, Aug. 15, 1910. Senator B. R. Tillman, Trenton, S. C. Mv Dear Senator Tillman: The Times and Democrat, a news? paper of Orangeburg County, Is making a great ado about my vote against putting lumber on the free list in the last Tariff Act. This paper practically accused me, in effect, of being a Republican because of this v< >te. I should, therefore, appreciate It if you will write me, answering the fol? lowing questions: First: Was the vote on the lumber hedule regarded by Democratic ? i'h rs as a test of party loyalty? Second! Do you personally regard my vote on this proposition as a breach of party loyalty? Third: Have I not always, as far ai you know, given loyal support to the fundamental principles of the Democratic party? 1 will greatly appreciate your kind? ness in giving me an Immediate reply, whb h I shall use for publication in the Tmes and Democrat and the (?rangeburg papers. Very truly, (Signed.) a. P, Lever. Senator Tillman's Reply. Trenton. S. C, Aug. 10 1910. Hon. A. F. Lever, Lexington, s. c. Dear Levers Replying to yours of August 1B I would say mv answer to your first lestlon would be emphatically, no; to the second question! no; to the third question, resj all with equal emphasis, Party lines were not drawn In the Senate or House ns far as l 1 nofV on the lumber sc hedule. Very truly yours. Signed. 1 B, I!. Tillman. Wien will work on the Tuomey He ipltal be started? There Is * rJd lo i"v le s cotton blight In the vicinity of Dalsell and Qalllard Cross Roads this season than tha re has been for several years. This i - due in part to the planting of wilt reslstanl cotton, and in part of the ans, It Is said. BRUN SON REPLIES. Discusses the Letters of Messrs. Ever? ett and Bristow?The Jerome Con? ference. To the Editor of The State: 1 regret to have to ask space to an? swer Messrs. Everett and Bristow, as 1 have already taken more than my shaie of your paper. However, I think tins is my last letter, as 1 have said enough to satisfy any intelligent man. If u few more of the members of that Jerome caucus should rise in Mr. Featherstone'! behalf, I shall be able to write out the minutes of that meet? ing. "A short horse is soon curried," and I need say but little in reply to Mr. Everett. I wish he had said some? thing definite, so that I could get hold of it. I did not say 'Mr. Featherstone was in the least weakening as a pro? hibitionist." I have not regarded Mr. Featherstone for years as a prohibi? tionist with any fixed principles. But a shork time has elapsed since he ad? vocated the sale of liquor in each and every county where a majority of the voters were in favor of it, and I be? lieve If a majority of the counties were in favor of selling it he would be singing that same song today. If it was a matter of principle and right in the past, it should be right today. We do not do evil that good many come. Mr. Everett says: "In that meeting no word or act of Mr. Featherstone's could have been construed as wanting in fidelity to the cause of prohibition." Mr. Everett has very poor conception of the duties of one who becomes a member of an organization?of party fealty. Should a member of any po? litical party commit such an act he would be kicked out. Now let me convict Mr. Feather? stone out of the mouths of his own witnesses. Mr. Featherstone acknowledged the authority of the regular pro? hibition conference held in tue Methodist church June 15 1905, when he claimed a seat in the com? mittee appointed by that body, ad? dressed the chair and said "I move," etc. And then when he moved to adjourn the subject to the call of the chairman, he clinched his acknowdedgement of the right of the prohibition conference to form th* oramlttee. No escape t?y th. t chan | pel. I Was Mr. Featherstone t the 3 rome hotel meeting? Dr Cr mer says lie was there, Mr, makes the impression that he was not there, but does not say so. Mr. Featherstone admits he was there and gives as the object of the meet? ing "to discuss the situation in gen? eral and to consider the advisability of putting out a ticket in 1906." Fur? ther he says: "It was decided that it would not be wise to put out a ticket. It was also decided that we would attend the conference during fair week, which had been called or which we anticipated would be call? ed by Mr. Brunson and certain oth? ers, and do what we could to keep them from putting out a ticket." Kow, Mr. Editor, Rev. Loouis J. Bristow gives the key to the whole situation. Mr. Bristow jays: "The sense of that conference was that it would be inexpedient to call a pro? hibition conference to nominate a State ticket, and that the idea should he opposed at the State fair confer? ence, which Mr. Featherstone sub? sequently did." That is the evidence put In by Mr. Featherstone and his friends and it proves a very bad case. Mr. Feather? stone did not attend the June 15, 1906, conference of prohibitionists which was called openly and the call published, where he could have used his influence honorably and tried to shape the policy of the prohibition? ists of the State, or prevent the call? ing of a State convention. Or he | could have gone into the State con-1 ventlon when It assembled and tried to prevent the nomination of a ticket' and it would have been honorable. But for him, after the prohibition eonference bad declared in favor of a State convention and appointed a committee with positive instructions to call the same, to get together a Secretly-Called body of less than a dosen men and there decree that it would be unwise or Inexpedient for the prohibitionists to hold a State convention) and decide that "we," we, we, would go into the commit? tee meeting soon to be held and pre? vent the calling of that state con? vention; then to carry It out With men who were not members of the committee?for Featherstone himself was an Intruder, never having been appointed on the commtttei?it was a ploltlcal trick of when hardened politicians would bo ashamed. The prohibition conference didn't ask Mr. Featherstone whether it were wise or otherwise as to th.' holding .it ;i State convention, it adopted Mr. I ',i istou' - resolul ion de? i irlng in favor of a State convention and ap? pointed a committi. to cail it. Why M r. Fe ithers lone bo opposed to :i State convention? Because bis ticket WttS already In the field; he did ind wish any regular prohibition candidate to oppose it and was unwil? ling to submit the claim Of bis ticket Farmers' Union News ?AND - Practical Thoughts for Practical Farmers (Conducted by K. W. Dnbta, Preeidenl Farmers' Union of Sumter County.) The Watchman and Southron having decided to double its service by semi-weekly publication, would improve that service by special features. The first to be inaugurated is this Department for the Farmers' Union and Practical Farmers which I have been requested to conduct. It will be my aim to give the Union news and official calls of the Union. To that end officers, and members of the Union are requested to use these columns. Also to publish auch clii lngs from the agricultural papers and Govern? ment Bulletins as I think will be of practical benefit to our readers. Ori? ginal articles by any of o. r readers telling of their successes or failures will be appreciated and | ublished. Trusting this Department will be of mutual benefit to all concerned, THE EDITOR. All communications for tl is Department should be sent to E. W. Dabbs. Mayeeville, s. c. Organize For U Per Cent. Cotton Tare Here la Work Which Farmer's Unions in Every Cotton State Should Begin at Once?Farmers Are Entitled to 0 Per Cent. Tare, Bat We Cannot Help a Man Who Is Willing to be Hun Over?Prompt Action Needed for 1910 Cotton Sea? son. _ Some time last fall, if 1 am not mistaken, I saw in The Progressive Farmer and Gazette an article, ad? vising farmers to put 30 pounds of bagging on their cotton, including ties. The farmers here, following your advice did so. The mill men kicked on it and stopped all local I buyers from buyers, saying a farmer had just as well put in plank to make up, as it would be more honor? able. Some one wrote an article in the Charlotte Observer about it making the same sort of argument, and I am surprised at your not replying to it. You surely have not noticed it. Not only myself, but all farmers are sur? prised at your not replying. What I want to know, is it law to put it on? If it is defend us; if not publish the amount we can put on it. C. Shelby, N. C. ? . tu a. sn< ? a rem embi r I hat a id "int. Progressiv? I . nei an1 G&sett ' can do in a case like this is to tell what is right. With all the informa? tion before us, we said, and still say, for the nomination to a State pro? hibition convention. Now, Mr. Edltor, I am to write the painful part of this article. I loved BrlstOW like a yolinger brother. Who persuaded him into that Jerome ho? tel caucus? He wrote and advocated the resolutions calling a State Con? vention as adopted by the prohibi? tion conference. Not long after he was nominated for lieutenant gover? nor there began to drop from hi? pen. little pieces complimentary of Featherstone. Was it Featherstoro's i hand that tendered the crown?or j counseled his nomination, that fasci? nated the boy? I don't know. Mr. Brlatow says I was "wrongly informed" as to the Jerome hotel meeting, and "It is very gratifying to see that The State's editorial com? ment upon Mr. Brunson's card does not Indorse nor sustain the state? ment concerning the Hotel Jerome conference." Et tu Brute! I now take a few words from Mr. Bristow's letter written to me a few days after the Jerome hotel meeting, in which he tells me what occurred there. After saying they all thought the prohibitionists should put out a ticket for th? next year, and the can? didate was to be not "Featherstone or a man like him .... I told him," referring to Featherstone, "plainly before all present that he could not be nominated, and that ... .1 and Others had utterly lost confidence in him." In the matter of nominations he says: "There was a decided move toward McCullough.I am inclined to favor him." A few days later Mr. McCulloUgh's nomination appeared in print. Was it the product of that Jerome hotel conference? If Mr. BrlstOW still thinks l was "wrongly Informed," or that 1 have twisted to suit my purpose any clause of his letter and demand Its publication, it shall go to the press though it make a momental ass of . him. li Mr. Featherstone, or Mr. Ever? ett, or Mr ciri^t, claims that I have not <|iiot< d correctly from the min? utes of the prohibition committee meeting of October 26, 1905, that pa per also properly signed by Mr. j Jaynes can go to the press. Now, Mr. Edltor, I have "made g.I" from the testimony of Mr. Featherstone, his frh nd i and t he records without calling u single wit? ness on my Bide, i thank God for a fine memoory and for carefully perserved records in this controversy. Joel El. Brunson. Sumter, August no, 1910. that the farmer is entitled to put 6 per cent, tare on his cotton bales. This is his right, but if the farmer is not disposed to insist on it, we cannot help it. The farmer has a right now to get 14 to 15 cents for good cotton, but if he is willing to be run over and let a buyer take it for 10 cents, we have too much im? portant work to do to go out and tight the battles of a man who won't stand up for himself. The 6 per cent tare is right and farmers from one end of the South to the other ought to organize with a view to enforcing this right on all 1910 markets. All that we can do is to tell them this and then it is up to them, through the Farmers' Unions and other ways to do the :'est. But why do we say the 6 per cent, tare is right? Put in a nutshell, our position is just this: Europe buys most of our cotton, and buys it on a basis of 6 per cent tare?fixes prices with a view to losing 6 per cent, to get net weight. Pres'dent J. L. Lee of the Georgia Farmers' Union publicly as? serted last fall that Wilmington, At? lanta, Augusta, and Savannah export? ers buy cotton on a basis of 22 pounds and put on the fuM 30 pounds before exDorting. ! th< !ui >peau n an ?> tun rs American rnanufa urerf should ieth- 1 r allo* 6 per cent or pai s dish er price for their lint. Anu u u per cent is right, then it is not the case that where the farmer puts on the full 6 per cent, he is acting dis? honorably and selling bagging and ties at cotton prices; the real truth Is, that where less than 6 per cent is used the* buyer might more rea? sonably be accused because he gets cotton at bagging prices. And it is not in getting cotton at bagging prices that the only unfair action has been go? ing on, if the information I have is correct. L,ast fall the American Textile Manufacturer jumped on me for my tight for the 6 per cent tare, and I answered them with the letter add? ed herewith. Although I watched their paper carefully they have nev? er yet published this reply, so far as I can learn, nor have they ever re? futed my position by private corre? spondence. One or two leading cot? ton maufacturers also attacked my position, but could not come back at me when I presented these argu? ments, although I made it plain that 1 wrote with no feeling toward either cotton buyer or cotton manufacturer and with an earnest desire not only to be absolutely fair, but to get any information that might show me In error. For as I said to them in the language of old Marcus Aurelius: "If any man can show me that I do not think or act aright, I will gladly change for I seek only the truth by which no man was ever injured." The fact that neither the manufac? turers themselves nor their official organ were able to attack or over? turn our arguments is the best com? mentary on their soundness. The paramount need, as I see it, is for a uniform system. There ought to be a definite understand? ing between the farmers' organisa? tions and the manufacturers' organ? izations as to the amount of tare to be allowed on each bale and the present double standard system, with all of its Irregularities and losses forever done away with. It the tare were less than 6 per cent, but uniform and unvarying, prices would soon be adjusted through natural law to compensate for the Increased percentage of tint in a bale, but with the present dou? ble-standard system the farmer gets eaughi between the upper and neth? er millstones and has lost thousands I of dollars as a result. I I f ,; per cent tare is to be and con- ' tlimo the recognised standard by European manufacturers - and it | has been the standard so long that ! manufacturers tell us it would be almost Impossible to change It?then j the American standard should be re- i \ Ised to accord with it. in other woVds, we must have a uniform system, and the 6 per cent t ire se? ms to be the only one that can be agreed upon. J The b tter which I sent the Amer? ican Textile Manufacturer. and which they did not even publish, may make our position even clearer and is appended herewith: A Letter the Manufacturers Wouldn't Print. J ? To the Eidtor: I have read youi * editorial in this week's Textile Manu? facturer, and I think that you en? tirely misunderstand the spirit of the Progressive 1 irmer and the Southern farmer. We do not wish to have a single piece of bagging sold at cotton prices. In fact, so far from vhe sys? tem of selling by net weight being j objectionable, the farmers know very vaMi that the mills do not really buy bagging and ties but always made their price with a view to buying only the net weight. The point I make is, that long custom and the uniform practice among European buyers is to assume that net weight is C per J cent, less than the gross v. ^lgbt, end that prices for cotton are fixed upon this basis?as it is reasonable bo as? sume since the larger part of our cotton crop is bought by Europe in which the 6 per cent tare Is the rule. A\ "As a matter of fact, then, it is not the case that where the farmer puts on {ull 6 per cent, he is selling bag bing and ties at cotton prices, but the real situation is, that where less than 6 per cent is put on, cotton Is sold at bagging prices. , \ "As for buying at net weight that is what the cotton world is aiming at now, for the price is lowered suffl-" ciently to allow for the bagging and uos. The need is for uniformity, so that one class (the buyers and manu? facturers) will not get the advantage which another class (the farmers) is \ entitled to. "Our position in the matter is mere clearly set forth in the enclosed edi? torial which we should like to have you publish. We are only seeking the truth in the matter and a square ? deal, which we believe can only come about by having a uniform sys? tem instead of th<? present double standard.?Progressive Farmer." SCHOLARSHIPS AWARDED. y t Young Men and Women Who Will Receive College Educations on State Scholarships. M the meeting of the State Hoard >f Education bold ii. Columbia Wed nesdu: s "V?ol..r-b; ?* ?r? t>>e eges were a warned. The iot'owing wert the ..wards for Sumtcr county; Clemson College?Bush M. Jack? son, Clarence C. DesChamps and one vacancy yet to be filled. University of South Carolina? Thomas M. Moore. For Lee county the awards were: Winthrop College?Sarah Bates 4 James. For Clarendon county: University of South Carolina?Fur man Bradham. Clemson College?Ellison Capers, Jr., R. Henry Ridgill. W. T. Sprott Jr. 1 Death. Alexander, infant son of Mrs. Mary H. Sparks, died at her residence on Sumter street, at 1 o'clock Tuesday 23rd, age 4 months. ( ?Dysentery Is a dangerous disease hut can be cured. Chamberlain's Colic, Cholera and Diarrhoea Remedy has bean successfully used In ntne epidemics of dysentery. It has never been known to fall. It Is equally . valuable for children and adults, and when reduced with water and sweet? ened It is pleasant to take. Sold by 1 W. W. SIbert. n Monday afternoon the Liberty Street and Little Rocks base ball teams played a fast game of ball, re? sulting in a victory of 9 to 0 in favor of the Little Rocks. Batteries: Little Rocks; Hoyt and Richardson; Liberty Street; Gallagh? er and Gallagher. ?When the digestion is all right, the action of the bowels regular, there is a natural craving and relish for food. When this Is lacking you may know that you need a dose of Chamberlain's Stomach and Liver Tablets. They strengthen the u!*es tlve organs, Improve the appetite end regulate the bowels. Sold by W. 'W. Sibert. A great many farmers are talking of planting winter cover crops, eith? er rye, vetch or crimson clover. The campaign for scientific farming is beginning to telL ?In buying a cough medicine, don't be afraid to get Chamberlain's Cough Remedy. There is no danger from it, and relief Is sure to follow. Especial? ly recommended for coughs, cold* and whooping cough. Sold by W. SIbert. It Is said that the magisterial ra iit Privateer is the. hottest politic proposition In the county camp There Is also a hard fought c on the Providence district. ?If your liver is sluggish a mm of t me, and you feel dull, ? constipated, t ike a doaa of Ch Iain's Stomach and Liver Tab night before rettring and you \ all right In the morning. Sole W. Sibert.