milOrS WARNING NOTE. roRMEii chief forkstkr MAKES Pl'BUC ST AT um f. NT. |__ Fower **** Cu*1 Lands Belonging to dovfmnifnt Are In sfrnsgec of Beine Gobbled Up by SftttcanJ Interest*, DecUrea Man Ro saoeed From Office by President. Washington. Jan. II.?-'The con Ptervatton of natural resources and the conservation of popular govern? ment are both at stake. The one | needs conservation no less than tho other." The statement epitomises the for? met announcement made public to? night by Clifford Plnchot who was recently removed as chief of the for ) eat service. The former official de elaree ths great moral Issue that now feeee the country Is not the loss of natural resources, so much as wheth? er special Interests or the people shall rule. The statement. In part Is as follows: I "At this time I rmve no comment St* make on recent events. Whether la or out of the Government service, I propose to stay In the fight for coaeervatJon and equal opportunity. Rvery movement and measure from * whatever source, that tends to ad F vao.ee conservation and promote gov? ernment by me^a for human welfare I shall try to help. Every movement and measure, from whatever source* that hindern conservation and prom? ises government by money for profit i shall endeavor to oppose. The su? lk preme test of movements and meas? ures la the welfare of the plain peo? ple. i am as ready to support the Administration when it moves tow? ard this paramount end as I am to oppose It when it moves away." Mr. Plnchot expressed his profound r regret at leaving the forest service " and pays tribute to the faithfulness and high quality of service rendered , by th* men with whom he worked. Oat of the work of the forest service, he proceeds, grew the conservation movement. "Today that movement expresses one of our deepest national convic? tions." he says, "and the principles for which It stands are received as axiomatic. It Is only the execution Of them which remains in doubt.' Mr. Plnchot then traced the recom? mendations of the conference on con 4 etrvation at the White House in May ltOt, the subsequent creation of the national conservation commission, which he says together with Presi? ded! Rooseveltmessage to Congress 4 on*Jhf% enfeject. set forth a compre henslve, definite scheme for the con servatlort of our natural resources? Which he applauds and endorses. Then ha proceeded: y "At this critical period, when the goal was In sight, enemies of conser? vation in Congress not only succeed* ed In preventing an appropriation with which to pursue the work but attempted to forbid Its progress by the Tawney amendment to the last sundry civil bill. Thereupon the work of the national conservation commission was stopped. "The recommendations of the com? mission still wait for action. All wise mea will agree that the situation Is serious. The Tawney amendment wee more than a mistake?It was a deliberate betrayal of the future. The dangers which confront the conser? vation movement today must be met by positive action in Congress. No action' will b> equivalent to bad ac ? tion and will have tho same results. 'Unless Congress acts the water powers will pass into the hands of special Interests without charge and without limit of time. So with the phosphate deposits on public lands, when the withdrawals which now / protect them are removed. 80 with the enormously valuable coal deposits in Alaska, which the present law would s*ll for 110 per acre. * "The danger of bad legislation is no less serious. The special Interests must no longer be allowed to take what they choose out of the great property of all the people. Those who steal public lands steal homes from men and women w'.no need them. Congress can stop the pillage, or Congress can let It go on. "In the absence of proper action two great conservation plans for the public welfsre may fall. The first Is the control of water powers on navi? gable streams In the public interest. The second Is the construction of the deeper waterways from the Great Lakes to the Oulf. "The unanimous opinion of the Mississippi Valley recognizes this wa? terway as a commercial necessity. It relieves with reason that the cost, which Is already officially known, will be trivial when compared with the benefits conferred. Transportation facilities create traffic. Failure to de? velop our waterways, together with adequate terminals and connection by rail, leaves to the railroad a com? plete monopoly of transportation In the Mlsslxstppl Valley." Mr Plneh