The watchman and southron. (Sumter, S.C.) 1881-1930, May 08, 1909, Image 4
SATURDAY, MAY 8, 190!).
The Sumttr Watchman wai found
?4 In lilt and the True Southron in
lite. The Watchman and Southron
??w has the combined circulation and
PAftneace of both of the old papers,
la manifestly the best advertising
lam la Samt er.
Isreeeetgatlon that Is being mad.*
of the State Hoepltal for the Insane,
not onsne to soon. The condl
m*j revealed by the testimony of Dr.
mom are dleeredlUble to the
If net to the men who have
of the Institution The Inves?
ts being conducted and the re
thereof that are published are
written mj friends of the rnanage
aaoat. and there Is no disposition to
create * conviction or paint things
Mocker than they are. hence we may
?eonctade Chart no sensational or un?
charged are being made. The
appear to he that the appropria
fee fhe maintenance of the asy
lasa te net swflclent and as a result
the Iwsaneesj reoetve neither proper
?are aor proper food. This Is bad
e>aoa?h. ben What Is worse Is the lack
art prole* Mo* esjatnet fire and the cer?
tainty ef aa apnening loss of life
emomf the unfortunate Inmates in the
?vent of the destruction of the 1 no?
tation by Are. This condition should
fje remedied at the earliest possible
Any. and If the Investigation aooom
pllehee nothing else It will have been
erorth while. If It Improves conditions
In this roapect
a ? e
How weald 17 mills suit the tax
payers of Sumter county.
e e ?
And sdded to this about ?7 miill
eh? yes* about take care of the ex
sXneee *' the elty of Sumter.
e e e
The tea levy for 1909 Is fixed anl
there can be no change this year, but
atch the sapply bill for 1910
es?
' The Manning Times thinks Con
rreeaman Lever la a good man to sue
eed Senator Ttllman. There are sev
ral thousand In the Seventh Dlstrh t
?f the same opinion.
ess *a
Sumter county has contrtbu:ed
119? 7? toward the Women's Monu
tnent Find Won't somebody give
he oth?r quarter?
Keartr all the stories that are worth
while ate myths, so what Is the um of
kicking up such a rumpus over the
plan to perpetuate Weems' f> hied po
tetoe an I pine bark dinner, at wt Ich
Ovr? Marlon was host and #ome un
known British ofllcer the truest of
honor? This story and the other
enaeterplece of ? Wee ma'?Wash ng
tnafa hl.teilet and cherry tree?are the
sj/eah-st thing* in American history,
the Mecklenburg Declaration not ex
ejepted, deaplte the fact that they nev?
er haptx'nwd
? ^???^??mmmmmm?????
The members of Boat O.. Travelers
Protective Association, will meet to?
morrow- evening at Hotel Jnckae i at
the usual hour to have the repoi t of
thm dslegatim that attended the
Charleston Convention. Th s will be
a very Interesting meeting, as differ?
ent matters pertaining to the good of
the Pod will be discussed.
f
Th* members of the City Fire De?
partment are objecting very much to
the location of the city dog povird In
the vacant lot lust ba/k of > o. S Reel
House. m< Ht ?-npeclally thos? v. h? i. r*
oo night duty
Mian Hann.i Krmt.Ht'on. of M nn? -
note, graduate optician, optimet.orlsl
and hand engraver, has acc?-pt d i
ponitkon with Mr W. V ' |MPAptOP<
and will have charge of t ?<? ?? j?11<? ii
parlor.
WO OIUKTION TO DAVIS' (?OH
TKAIT.
Capt. John C. irr.i Hay* Ameri?
can \a%y U Without Sectional l?ro
Mhm
Charb*Htnn. May 5.?Capt. John C.
Fr? o ? Mmmandinic Um United
Ptnte? bnltlenhlp Mississippi, doet not
object t ? the pl.o lnK of |he portrait
of Jefferson i>* vi* upon Um elhft r aer
"Vlea MtUtA um war vessel In now <m
tisjr way up t ti ? ? Mississippi to receive
i ? the State In whose honor is
nnm d Responding to a tetegraphle
PPSmtSt ? f . w h?dh*'t he and th? other
pjnfrcsi ? of the Mississippi were In
ewn i . alth UM an:ISJCJSjlflM whleh
the placing of the llkenes .( th d- ,id
chtrf' ;nn .if th' font*? liT.it y upon th"
sliver service has in.m. d. Capt. Ft?4
tnont ? THKlr wlr?-d th*- < 'hat leston
Xews and Courier as follows, his dls
1) it h t.'-oiK dated New < ?r ? n.
?The navy Is without StttlOS ?I pre?
judice and its patriotism BftOWl n*?
l>oundarl*-s save those <>f the great
intry at large."
Anmter Is too hi* a town for the re?
porter to walk out on the streets and
?ee who are n town, so If yoj have
vfcettora. let the Item know It by phone
sjt otherwise.
Farmers' Union News
?AND ?
Practical Thoughts for Practical Farmers
(Conducted by K. W. Dabbs, President Furniers* Union of Sumter
County.)
The Watchman and Southron having decided to double its service by
semi-weekly publication, would Improve that service by special features.
The first to be Inaugurated Is this Department for the Farmers' Union and
Practical Farmers which I have been requested to conduct. It will be my
aim to give the Union news and official calls of the Union. To that end
officers, and members of the Union are requested to use these columns.
Also to publish such clippings from the agricultural papers and Govern?
ment Bulletins as I think will be of practical benefit to our readers. Ori?
ginal articles by any of our readers telling of their successes or failures
will be appreciated and published.
Truetlng this Department will be of mutual benefit to all concerned,
THE EDITOR.
All communications for this Department should be sent to E. W. Dubbs,
Mayesvllle, H. C.
The meeting In Columbia laat week
wm largely attended for this busy
season of the year. Our readers have
seen such of the resolutions as are
tor the public in the dally papers.
The public resolutions though are a
poor Index of the value of such a
mooting to the Union and to the del?
egates. The greatest good comes
from the elbow touch, the exchange
of views In private conversation, and
the broadening of the Individual by
?eclng it from the other fellows stand?
point.
? ? ?
The writer did not stay to the Fri?
day meeting, but spent several hours
it Wedgefleld working for the Union,
ind organised the High Hills Union
it the O. S. M. A. that afternoon. In
connection with the Rural Improve
nent League and the Demonstration
""arm located here this Union starts
>ff ur der very favorable auspices. .
E. W. D.
Two Kinds of Steers.
Let us now see If we can show the
*eal reason why the first-class beef
>reed steer is superior to tho scrub
or beef production.
In the scrub class, when It comes to
[>eef production, we must put the
lairy-bred steer as well as the native
icrub of 'no breeding. No surplus
flesh Is desirable in the dairy cow.
Her business is to convert feed into
milk, and if she converts it into flesh
Instead, to cover her own back, she Is
a fraud. On the other hand, the busi?
ness of the beef animal is to convert
feed Into flesh or bee? and put it on
hi." back, loins and hips where the
?Oat valuable meat is found, and
with him. as with all other meat- pro?
ducing anlmnls. the desirable: shape
is as near that of a box, or parallelo?
gram, as possible.
The first point that suggests itself
to the average person wherein the
beef steer Is superior to the scrub is
that he will make more pounds of
gain in weight on a slven amount of
feed. To the surprise of most people,
this is not so. We know this state?
ment always raises a vigorous dissent
win-never made* almost anywhere in
the South, but it Is, all the same, a
' ? t w liich has been p: ??tty well esta?
blished. Years ago when Sanborn of
Missouri announced the results of
\> dim* experiments In which the Oa
rk Mountain scrub made as many
? ?uinis of Kala in proportion to feed
consumed cs did well bred Southern
steers, as great a protest aiose as is
still made against It n the South; but
subsequent tests at the experiment
stations of Ontario. Kansas, Iowa.
MlehU'an. Missouri and elsewhere
have shown that Holsteins, Jerseys
und other scrubs in beef production,
will gain as^many pounds in weight
0*i a given quantity of feed as will
l> ef-breil animals. If the well bred
beef steer gains in Wtight more rapid?
ly than the scrub, which he will, it is
because he at?* more. The difference
In the respect, however! is not |.eat.
l-.arly .Maturity ami Hatte? Quality.
We must therefore look further for
the cause of the fhs.-elass beef steer's
superiority over the scrub. Early ma?
turity is an Important point of roper*
orlty In a fOOd bet I aniin il. for it us?
ually means cheaper cost of produ
tlon. It bi been found that It costs
from 1 5 to || per c? nt. less to produce
beef In a steer that Is An killed at 16
tu II month! than on one that Is fed
umii three yean old* Henry In his
) > . .is and Feedings'1 itates that it
< >ts about double tiie second year
and three times as muoh the third
year to produce ? pound of beef as it
?l?.es the Hrst year ?f an animal's life.
The fain per day Is noch more rapid
and requires less Iced per pound. < >ne
reason for this Is that It requires near
I) twice as mu< b t. keep I 1,000?
p< und .steer alive without gain or loss
ai It does to maintain a 500-pound
steer. These ate facts, which apply
to all animals, but Which ITC have
either not learned or hi\e chosen to
Ignoff. It is not unusual for us to
keep ho*s until they Weigh 100 or 500
l i und>. and the man who has raised
one of these large h?>gs Is frequently
found boasting- of it, when it is rath?
er to his discredit. It cost twice as
much to put the last 290 pounds on
that 500-pound hog as It would to
have made 200 pounds of better pork
In a younger and smaller animal.
The chief point of superiority of
the first-class beef animal over the
scrub still remains to be stated and
it is typical of the superiority for a
definite line of work. The first-class
beef animal is superior to the scrub
because, while- he does not make any
more pounds of gain on a certain
given amount of feed, the gain he'
mn
makes is worth more per pound.
This is well brought out by a test
of two steers made at the Iowa Agri?
cultural College. One was a Heroford I
and the other a Jersey. They had
consumed almost exactly the same
amounts of feed per pound of weight.
They were sold on the open market
at Chicago and the Hereford steer
sold for $2.22 1-2 a hundred pounds,
or 49 per cent, more than did the
Jersey steer. Let no one conclude
trjat he was not worth that much
more. The buyers know their busi?
ness, and the man who thinks they
don't is the fellow who breeds scrub
cattle. These steers charged their
owner the same amount of feed for |
100 pounds of live weight, but the
Hereford paid 49 per cent, more for
his feed. To which kind of steer are
you giving your feed. Mr. Farmer?
To the one that pays 11.00 for a given
amount or the one that pay* $1.49 for
th? same amount of the same food?
You would not market your cotton on
the $1.00 market, why don't you take
your cottonseed meal, hay and grass
to the $1.49 market. Instead of to the
old $1.00 market?
Now, let us see why there was this
difference in the price per hundred
pounds of live weight. The follow?
ing camparlson explains it
Live wleght .... 1.316 lbs 1,327 lb*
Pressed weight . 88S lbs 763 lb>
Loom fat. 90 MM 190 lbs
These figures tell the jompXe
st?vy, Willie the Hereford steer
weiuhed alive 11 pounds less, he gave
a dressed carcass that weighed 12T?
pounds more. That is, he gave 125
pounds more beef to be sold off the
blockt or in other words, he dressed
17*1 DOT cent, of the live weight,
while the Jersey steer dressed 57."?
pc cent, of his. But v bat became of
?hi extra Weight in the Jersey steer"
He had l-SQ pounds Of loose fat whde
the Hereford had only 90 pounds, and
BR pounds of suet to 38 In the
Hereford. This accounts for 147
pounds. Now. this 14 7 pounds of tal?
low was worth 4 cents a pound, while
the HQ pounds of meat which took its
place in the Hereford steer was worth
10 to 20 cents a pound.
In VltW of thes,- facts, there is no
longer any Question as to why the
Hereford steer sold for $6.75 while the
Jersey Itter sold for $4.51 1-2 pet
hundred pounds live weight.
The difference between good live
.-tock and scrubs may be the difference
between profit and loll tO the man
Who fi ed.s. them.
UOOSEVELT BREAKS RECORD.
lie lias Killed More Linn* in the
Protectorate Tlian Any Oilier Man.
Nairobi, British East Africa. May 5.
?Theodore Roostvtlt wtnt lion hunt
im: again yesterday, and before the
chase wai over, two more big lions
had fallen before hi- gun. The ani?
mals were tnCOUnttrtd and killed in
the tall grass.
|fr, Roostvtlt now holds the record
for lion killing In the protectorate.
Since Saturday Of last week a total <?f
ti\? lions and one lioness have been
bagged by him.
Memorial Pay at Statehurg.
Hon, 11. L smith. ?i Camden, will
dtltvtr the memorial oration at the
cemtttry of the church <?t the Hols
Cross, Statehurg. on Saturday after?
noon at four O'OlOOk. The public Is
Cordially Invited to attend the e\er
Olltl
Hereford
Steer
Jersey
Steer
Suet
38 11 s
55 lbs
FISH AND GAME LAWS. I
_.
i
THE STATUTES OF SOUTH CARO?
LINA ON THE SUBJECT. I
Seines May be Used Only on Certain 1
Days of Uie Week?The Bird Sea?
son?Law as to Tftwjpasj
There is not a great deal of infor?
mation among the people as to the
fish, game and trepass laws of this
State, and the following will be of
especial Interest to those who are con?
cerned about the subject:
"There shall be a close time in all
the creeks, streams and Inland wa?
ter* of the State, from the setting of
the sun each Thursday until the ris?
ing.of the sun on each Monday, dur?
ing which time all seines, nets or
any plan or device for th* stoppage
or collecting of fish whteh obstructs
any portion of any creek, stream or
inland waters, other than a dam for
manufacturing purposes, shall be re?
moved from said creeks, streams or
inland waters, and any person or per?
sons using any such seine, net plan
or device, in violation of the provisi?
ons of this section shall be deemed
guilty of of a misdemeanor, and upon
conviction thereof before any court of
competent jurisdiction, shall be fined
in the sum of two hundred dollars,
one half of which shall go to the in?
former and the other half to the
county in which the case shall be
tried, or be imprisoned for a period of
not less than three nor more than six
months, or both, in the discretion of
the court trying the case. Nothing
herein contained shall apply to fish?
ing with dip nets used by hand.
Sec. 521. It shall not be lawful for
any person whomsoever, at any time,
to erect or keep up afiy fish trap or
other device for catching fish, or to
fish with any net or seine, within
elprhty yards of any dam erected by
the order or at the expense of the
State across any stream intended
thereby to be made navigable. in
whioh dams there shaH be left or
constructed any sluice for the passage
of fish; and all and every person or
persons offending shall for each and
every offense pay the sum of twenty
dollars.
An Act- to Prohibit Trespass.
Sec. 1. Be it enacted by the gen?
eral assembly of the State of South '
Carolina, That from and after the ap
provnl of this act, any person or per- |
sons entering upon the lands of an- !
other, for any one of the following
purposes of hunting, fishing, trapping,
netting, gathering fruit, straw or turf,
vegetables, herbs or cutting timber
on the same without the consent of
the owner or manager thereof, shall
be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor,
and upon conviction threof, shall
pay a fine of not more than twenty
(20) dollars, or be imprisoned at hard
labor not; more than thirty (30 > days,
ter each and every offense.
Sec. 2. All acts, or parts of acts,
inconsistent with this act are hereby
repealed.
Approved 22nd February, A. D. 1905
Gnifte Birds.
See. 2. That for the purpose of
this act. the following shall he con?
sidered game birds, swans. Wild
geese, brant, wild ducks, rails (marsh
hens.) coots, gallnules. surf birds,
snipe, woodcock, sandpipers, upland
plover, curlew, wild turkey, prairie
chicken, quail (partridge,) rice birds,
black bird and dove. All other spe?
cies of wild resident or migratory
birds shall he considered non-game
birds.
See. 3. That no person within the
State shall kill, catch or have in his
or their possession, living or dead,
an) resident or migratory wild bird
Other than a game bird, or purchase,
. far or expose for sale, any such
wild game bird, after it has been
killed or caught, except as permitted
by this act.
Destructive Birds Not Included.
Bee. 10. That the English sparrow.
COCper'l hawk, shai p-shinned hawk
and great horned owl and all other
birds which are by nature destructive
of other birds, are not Included
among the birds protected by this act;
nor are the nests and eggs of such
birds protected hereunder. This act
does not prevent any person from kill?
ing crows on ins premises it* destruc?
tive to his crops, Provided that said
birds are not sold or offered for sah-,
or shipped out of the state.
Bee li. That any person violating
any of the provisions of this act cx
i?? Sec. s, shall be guilty of a mis?
demeanor, and shall be liable to B fine
of not less than one dollar ($1.00)
nor more than five dollars ($5.00),
tOV each bird, living or dead, or part
of a bird, <>r nest, or set of CggS, or
part thereof, uiih-d or captured or
,.(,ssessed. In violation of this act, or
be Imprisoned In the county jail for
POl more than thirty (10) days.
Crosses of Honor to be Presented
After the memorial exercises next
Tuesday afternoon Crosses of Honor
will be presented to the following
\ eterans:
R. J. Aldis. YV. M. (Iraham. J. ,T.
Johnson, J. it Kolb, J. i. Lesesne, J.
<;. Logan, W. H. McLeod, \v. iv
Osteen, J. H. Ramsey, J. Turner, J.
w. Smith, a. H. Weeks, J. s. Wells,
j W. H. Yates.
the Btjjjj mmm.
A SSI ST A XT SU PERI XTEX DENT
TBLL8 OF ABUSES THAT
EXIST.
Institution |g Overcrowded and Filthy
?Attendants are Negligent, tlie
Food Poor and There Is Practically
No Fire Protection?A Fire would
Create a Panic and Rescue of Pa?
tient* Would lie Difficult.
Columbia, May 6.?A session yes?
terday of nearly seven hours of the
legislative committee at the State
Hospital for the Insane brought out
interesting facts, some of which will
be enlarged on today when a further
examination is made of one of the
witnesses. j
The committee switched abruptly
yesterday morning from the examine- j
tion of some of the former inmates
to the examination of Dr. J. L.
Thompson, the assfstant superlnten- I
dent, who has been with the institu?
tion for about 27 years. Later Super- 1
visor Mitchell was placed on the'
stand and his examination will con- j
tinue today. The testimony of Dr.
Thompson occupied all of the morning i
session and a part of the afternoon .
session, the witness being questioned |
by Dr. Babcock, the superintendent,
who brought out that there had never
been any desire on the part of him?
self to neglect any duty imposed upon
hfm or upon others under him Ev?
en* complaint had been Investigated
carefully.
In the testimony of the other wit?
ness, Supervisor Mitchell brought out j
the same facts as chose mentioned by i
Dr. Thompson. Vhere has been neg- j
ligence by some yt the attendants, the j
condition of th? wards In the male
white patients iepartment is unsani?
tary and unclean and for this reason
tnore nurses are needed and a num?
ber of improvements are absolutely
necessary. The entire department Is
crowded and new equipment is badly
needed.
The examination of Dr. Thompson
commenced with a general description
of the entire institution, but after a
few questions was brought down to
Ms own department. His testimony
was listened to with closest attention
by the committee. Most of the ques?
tions were asked by Mr. W. C Harri?
son, a member of the investigating
committee, although others afterwards
made inquiries on the matters
brought out
Improvements Needed.
Dr. Thompson stressed the necessity
for improvements and the fact that
capable attendants were not now em?
ployed. Those who were given em?
ployment afterwards left and did not
seem to take the interest in the care
of the patients desired. His depart?
ment was shown to be unclean, d??
to lack of attention and lack of addi?
tional attendants and the need! of
more system was emphasized by :he
witness.
He stated most positively that Su?
perintendent Bahcock had aided him
in every way possible and that every
complaint made to the iupeiintendent
had received attention.
The testimony of Supervisor Mitchel
was also interesting. It was along the
same lines as that given by Dr
Thompson. There was need of more
nurses, the wards were not kept in a
cleanly condition and many of the em?
ployes w?re careless. The dairy was
not well kept and there was no at?
tempt made to have a Are drill and
adequate fire protection.
There was a decided lack of ade?
quate bathing facilities and the food
given the patients was not up to the
standard as considered by a sane man.
I This, of course, was not due in many
I instances to the carelessness of the
j attendants but to the lack of more
nurses and the need of larger appro?
priations.
j The testimony given was in answer
j to questions and therefore appears
j rather disjointed. However, several
members of the committee asked ques
[ tlons of the two witnesses as ideas
' would be advanced, and. as a result,
subject after subject was touched on,
passed over and brought up again,
i This accounts for the apparently dis?
jointed way In which the matters un?
der consideration are touched on by
the witnesses. The examination of Dr.
Thompson arrd of Supervisor Mitchell
was conducted principally by Mr. Har?
rison, although other members of the
committee asked numerous questions
of both Dr. Babcock asked a num?
ber of questions of Dr. Thompaon but
hL* questioning of Mr. Mitchell, If
made at all, wiTI be today.
Drs. Dick and Sawyer, members of
th* committee, may be present today
arrd if possible some of the expert
medical testimony will be taker, be?
fore them.
HLSPEXSARY STTUATIOX QUIET.
Trine for Filing Rehearing of Case
Before Supreme Court Ha? Paseed.
Columbia, May 6.?The mandate in
the dispensary case was not sent here
from the Federal Court today, as was
expected. The time for the filing of
the papers expired last night, and the
decision is expected to reach here to?
morrow. It is understood that the
possibility of a petition for a rehear
fng before the United States Supreme
Court is now over.
Attorney T. M. Mordecai, of
Charleston, was in the city today.
The winding-up commission will
meet about the 17th to take up the
dispensary matter and map out its
work.
The best way to make sure of be?
ing happy is to make som* one else
glad.
25c. 25c.
BED
HOSIERY.
25c. 25c.
SUMTER, S. C.
25c. 25c.
ABSOLUTELY
GUAR&KTEED
25c.
25c.
1 HS WIDE HE
Looking out for the interest
of our Lady friends :: :: ::
WE have secured the exclusive agency for
RED RAVEN HOSIERY for Ladies and
Gentlemen. We guarantee this line of hosiery to give
absolute satisfaction or replace any of them proving
unsatisfactory with a new pair or your money back.
Remember there is no red tape to this, no coupons
to sign, nothing but our absolute guarantee
that this line of hosiery will do just as we say. The
price the same as any similar quality hosiery, 25c per
pair. Give them a trial.
|25c. 25c.
GOOD BYE
DARNING.
25c. 25c.
YOURS,
I'M!
Ho.
25c. 25c.
MORE TIME
-FOR
FANCY WORK.
25c. 25c.