The watchman and southron. (Sumter, S.C.) 1881-1930, September 05, 1906, Image 3
A KANSAS OUTRAGE.
Wilson's Drug Store, The Chronicle
and Wiles' Commission Store De?
stroyed.
r
The State of Kansas is preparing to
segregate the races- in her public
schools, and Mr. I L. Dayhoff, State
superintendent, is sending out letters
of inquiry as to the propos?e policy
to superintendents in other States.
Hon. J D. Eggleston, Jr., got one
yesterday, and its tone is surpris?
ing in that it asks if Virginia has
separate schools.
Here is the letter:
"There is a movement in Kansas
looking toward the segregation of the
races in the public schools where the
per cent, of colored population will
warrant the separation.
What is the condition of affairs ii*
your State? Have you segregation of
races? If so, is it advisable? Do you
personally favor it? What is the con?
dition of public sentiment -with ref?
erence to the same? Have you any
laws bearing 021 the subject? I would
appreciate very much any informa?
tion th?t you may have on the sub?
ject. Thanking you in advance,** etc.
The communication is rather amus?
ing to Virginians. Mr. Eggleston has
replied very frankly and in a few
clear sentences. Here is his reply in
full:
"Your letter of the 21st instant
lias been received. Virginia has al?
ways had separate schools for white
and colored children. This is in every
way advisable, I think. Public
sentiment in Virginia is a unit in fa?
vor of this policy. The law on the
subject is embodied in our Constitu?
tion, which says: "White and color?
ed children shall not be taught in
the same schools."
There were some hearty laughs
concerning the correspondence
around the Capitol, but it is thought
the letter received by Mr. Eggleston
from his Kansas contemporary was a
copy of a general one which went
out to other State superintendents.
Richmond Times.
Wen Worth Trying.
*W. H. Brown, the popular pension
attorney, of Pittsfield, Vt., says:
"Next to a pension, the best thing to
get is Dr. King's New Life Pills." He
writes: "They keep my family in
splendid health." Quick cure for
headache, constipation and bilious?
ness. 25c. Guaranteed at Sibert's
Drug Store. ?
The new Catholic church in Co?
lumbia will soon be ready for the
use of the members of the denomina?
tion.
?In these days of rush and hurry
courtesy is often forgotten. In the
mad, pell mell rush of our life little
things are done to offend that we
rather remained undone. A hastily
eaten meals and. its resultant head?
ache may cause us social or financial
loss. The wise man or woman is the
one who relieve?* little ills of this sort
by a little dose of Kodol for dyspep?
sia. It digests what you eat and
puts your stomach back into shape.
Sold by all druggists.
Chamberlain's
[CofSc, Choiera ft Diarrhea Remedy
Almost every bandy has need
o? a reliable remedy for colic or
fcdhea at tome bm* during the
year.
Th? remedy ? recommended
by deaien who have told it far
nany years and know ks value.
it has received thousands ol
testimonials from grateful people.
it has been prescribed by ph
sieians with the most satisfactory
results.
It has often saved Efe before
medicine could have been sent for
tr a physician summoned.
it only costs a quarter. Caa
you afford to risk so much for se
Ide? BUY IT NOW.
isa a Baa
aaaaaaa
aaa a a aa
a a a a a a a
a a a g a s a
HIGH LIVING
is an everyday affair with those who
eat at our restaurant. The best of
food is served at a modest cost.
GOOD EATING
and our bill of fare go together. Well
fed men dine here because they get
what they want and as they want it.
It's a pleasure to pay for good food.
That's why we have so many good
patrons.
THE SUMTER RESTAURANT,
V. E. Brunsen, Proprietor.
2-2i-6m * JMffl*
i M m ii i ii III III.i ?ri -
Plain Words to Negroes.
The leaders of the Niagara move
ment ought to have included in theL
! address a recital of their detestation
? of the hideous crimes of the negro
j race, which make the race feared
and hated wherever there is a lonely
homestead in a negro community,
and should have concluded with a
solemn pledge to consecrate the in
, telligent men of the race to a per?ts
" tent effort to eradicate the evil which
is the prime source of the "unreason?
ing prejudice against the negro."
When intelligent men like those in
the Niagara movement show the in?
telligence to grapple with this ques?
tion in behalf of the two races, their
demands for other things will meet
with a respectful hearing which will
astonish them.-Philadelphia Ledger.
This advice from a Northern news?
paper may well be taken to heart by
the better class of negroes in all sec?
tion. Southern newspapers generally
are preaching a crusade against
lynching, and they would be success?
ful if the black brutes would cease
their devilish practice. But, so long
as they keep it up, white men will
lynch them in spite of all the preach?
ing, and it will be next to impossible
to conviict and punish the lynchers.
The Times-Dispatch is opposed to
lynching for any crime, knowing, as
it does, that lynching for one crime
leads to lynching for other crimes,
breeds contempt of law and the spirit
of lawlessness, and makes a bad mat?
ter worse. But the majority of men
throw argument to the winds when
brought face to face with this crime.
They may give respectful hearing to
the governor of the State who plea da
with them, but they will not give
heed. So long as this crime is com?
mitted by negroes lynching will con?
tinue. These may not be pleasant
facts, but they are facts, and facts
must be reckoned, with.
What is the negro race going to do
about it? The question is asked with
all possible seriousness, for it is a
question which concerns the whole
negro race. Every such crime re?
flects in a measure upon the black
race, and places every negro man,
more or less, under suspicion. The
most fiendish crime of this nature
ever known in Virgian was committed
by a negro janitor in the public
schools of Lynchburg, who was high?
ly estemed by teachers and pupils,
who enjoyed the implicit confidence
of the superintendent. It is not meant 1
to imply, of courses, that all negro
men are liable to commit this crime.
Many of them are as far from it as
white men. But, when so many are
guilty, how can the whites discrimi?
nate?
It is a terible situation for the
black race, and they must reckon
with it. Once more we commend to
the leaders of the negro race, those
who are genteel and who would lead
their people to higher things, the ad?
vice of the Philadelphia Ledger. In?
stead of passing resolutions condemn?
ing lynchings, "^t them address them?
selves to the lase of it, and make
an earnest and persistent effort to
eradicate it. It should be the pre?
vailing topic of sermons, of lectures,
and all manner bf discourses by negro
speakers; and teachers of negro boys
should hammer into their pupils, day
after day, the enormity of this crime.
By these means, and by all possible
?means, the respectable negroes should
make a crusade against the infamy,
and endeavor with the help of God
and the help of the law to stamp it
out. If they succeed, lynching will
cease; if the practice is continued, not
only will lynching continue, but the
very existence of the negro race will
be in jeopardy.-Richmond Times.
Starving to Deatli.
?Because her stomach was so weak?
ened by useless drugging that she
could not eat, Mary H. Walters,, of
Clair street, Columbus, O., was liter?
ally starving to death. She writes:
"My stomach was so weak from use?
less drugs that I could not eat, and
my nerves so wrecked that I could
not sleep; and not before I was given
up to die was I induced to try Elec?
tric Bitters, with the wonderful result
that improvement began at once, and
a complete cure followed." Best
health tonic on earth. 50c . Guaran?
teed by Sibert's Drug Store.
------^
Lancaster is endeavoring to get
the Southern Railway to give that
town better depot accommodations.
Work on the present building is in
progress and it remains to be seen
whether the authorities will comply
with the request.
Pain From a Burn Promptly Relieved
by Chamberlains Pain Balm.
*A little child of Mrs. Michael
Strauss of Vernon. Conn, was recently
in great pain from a burn "M the hand
and as cold applications only increas?
ed the inflammation. Mr. Strauss
came to Mr. James X. Nichols, a local
merchant, for something to stop :!)'.
pain; Mr. Nichols says: "I advised
him t-? use Chamberlains Pain Balm.
a33d the first application drew out ibo j
inflammation and gave immediate re- j
lief. 1 have used this liniment myself j
and recommend it very <>f?"ii for cuts, j
burns, strains and lame back, and j
have nevei known it to disappoint."
i
Fer sale by druggists. i
SIMPLIFIED SPELLING.
Professor Brander Matthews, of Co?
lumbia University, Tells How to Get
Simplified Spelling in the Schools.
In the plain spoken paper on the
"Problem of Spelling Reform" which'
Professor Skeat read before the Brit?
ish Academy last May and which has
been published by the Oxford Univer?
sity Press that ardent and accom?
plis! . d student of English con?
temptuously brushed away all the ig?
norant objections to the progressive
simplification of our spelling and
urged a number of Of further omis?
sions of needless letters. Prof. Skeat,
it may be well to note, has accepted
membership in the Simplified Spelling
Board, and so has Mr. Henry Bradley,
the co-editor (with Dr. Murray) of
the monumental Oxford Dictionary.
But Prof. Skeat's proposed reforms
are far more radical than the practice
of the editors of the Oxford Diction?
ary and even than the recommenda?
tions of the Simplified Spelling Board.
In fact, these recommendations seem
verv conservative, indeed, when set
alongside those suggested by the ed?
itor of the "Etymological Dictionary."
The distinguished British scholar
makes it clear that he desires imme?
diate orthographic improvement for
certain scientific reasons for the
sake of the English language itself,
and in order to make o,\r noble
tongue a fitter instrument for the
work that lies before it. But he also
gives two practical reas ns why Eng?
lish orthography ought to be bettered
as soon as possible. The first of
these reasons is that a simplification
of our spelling would save both time
and money: "Every one would gain
by it; the writer would havt, fewer
letters to' write, the printer would
have fewer letters to print, and the
reader would have fewer to spell and
to read." And then Prof. Skeat sun
ports this practical argument with
another which is strictly scien?
tific "Many ambiguities would dis?
appear, and the written record would
exhibit a closer approximation to the
sounds which it professes to repre?
sent."
Then he brings forward a second
practical reason for adopting these
provements "that the tasks of
Learning to read would be considera?
bly simplified, and the time taken to
achieve that task would be considera?
bly shortened to the equal delight and
profit both of te?cher and pupil. In
this case there can be no doubt at all
that the sums thus saved to the na?
tion would be very considerable." !
Even more important than the saving
of money would be the saving effected
in the plastic period of childhood
when every minute is neded to supply
the young with the training that will
best equip them for life. That more
or less of this precious time must be
wasted in mastering the misleading
intricacies of English spelling is ob?
vious to all of us. But just how great
this waste is no one can say with
certainty. Dr. Harris, relying on cer?
tain experiments in the St. Louis
schools, concluded that it amounted
to a year or so. Prof. Calvin Thom?
as, in his Presidential address to the
Modern Language Association, made
a rough-and-ready calculation and
arrived at the conclusion that more
than a year and a half of a child's j
time was spent unprofitably in learn?
ing how to spell.
Unfortunate as is the loss of time,
our pitiful orthography has another
and even more serious disadvantage,
known to all teachers. It contradicts
the spirit of moern education, which
fe based on trainr'ng the pupil to see
things for himself and to make his
own deductions from what he has
seen. The aim is to lead the child to
observe, and then to generalize the
result of his observations into a rule.
But our present spelling runs counter
to this effort. Observation will not
help the child; and he must inces?
santly disregard analogies, because
there are often many different sym?
bols for a single sound and many dif?
ferent sounds for a single symbol.
Prof. Lounsbury has pointed out that
one sound, that of "e" in let, is rep?
resented in at least seven different
ways-"e" in let, "ea" in head, "ei"
in heifer, "eo" in leopard, "ay" in
says, "ai" in said, and by "a" in
many. The sound of "o" in so is oven
more absurdly misrepresented-so,
-ev.-, owe, O, oh, bow, roo. boat,
beaux, bureau, hautboy, yoeman,
though. Here is confusion worse
confounded. Here is chaos come
again. What are tho children to do?
How can the teachers help them?
All ana!-.?ifs faa; and no rule is pos?
sible. The solo resource is to cram
the memory, and to reject the result
of observation nn.l of reason. This
not only wastes the ?im<- of th<- child.
but ii also upsets and contradicts th?
i
raining he has l.a receiving.
This >s reason enough wny all good j
?tiz?ns should wi.-ii to <>~r the spell- i
'ng of English simplified and to aid in !
.he introduction of simplified spelling
nro our schools; V et there is another
vason potent vvith all who want to
:aw our orthography more exact j
rcientifically and more efficient prac
i ca Hy. if any real advance is :..> be
nade in the next few years, it must j
ture will rarely take the trouble
adopt the simpler spelling; they h
waited time in acquiring a mastery
our present orthography ar/1 they
unwilling to spend any more in
quainting themselves with the la
improvements. Even if they are
sympathy with these improveme
even if they have conquered tl
natural prejudice in favor cf
spelling to which they have long b
accustomed, still they feel themsel
too old to learn new tricks They
willing to let well enough alone.
This is the obstacle which confro
al! who seek to better our orthog
phy: and it is not easy to overcome
forces all the advocates of impro
ment to be cautious, to go very sic
ly, to urge nothing violent or sudd
to be as tolerant and as persuasive
possibly and to be satisfied w
faith unaccompanied by good wer
But the children have no prejudi
:n favor of spellings that ought to
discarded. They prefer the simpl
possible form. They welcome the i
thograhpy that conforms to analo,
They can be soon won to the gc
cause; and when they are grown
their children can be led to ace*
still further simplifications. A:
thus the good work will go on slow
generation after generation, until t
users of the English language at h
recover the phonetic; sense, which h
been lost in consequence of our c
thographic muddle, but which is pc
sessed by the users of every otb
language.
And this brings us to the questi
whi-h stands at the head of this p
per. How can we !get simplifi
spelling into the schools? And t
answer is easy, even if the process
likely to be long. To get simplifi
spelling into the schools we need on
educate public opinion to believe th
this is what ought to be done. Wh<
once the public has made up. its mil
that the spelling of English ought
be simplified and that the best way
begin is with the school childre
then the teachers and the superi:
tendents and the school boards will 1
only too glad to do what will be e:
pected of them. It is not for us :
tell them how to do it; the success^
steps to be taken may be left safe
to the skill of the teaching body.
What is needful is to focus attet
ti on on this important subject and 1
arouse a lively interest in it. Peop
must be made to see that there
nothing sacred about our accepte
orthography, and that the spelling <
our language has never been fix?
finally, but has. always been slowl
simplifying itself by the castin
out of useless letters. They must t
educated in the history of spellin*
and the many changes that hav
taken place from Chaucer to Shaki
speare, from Dryden to Johnson an
even in the nineteenth century, mus
be made familiar. They must be en
couraged to understand that a stead
movement toward simplification ha
always been evident, and they mus
be made to recognize that the tim
has now come when this slow pro
gress toward the remote goal can b
accelerated.
When the people at large are one
convinced that our present spellinj
does harm to the children; that i
wastes the time and money, of mei
and women, and that it tends to pre
vent the adoption of English as th<
world language of the future-whet
that happy hour shall arrive, im?
provement will follow at once, spon?
taneously and unhesitatingly. Ai
Lowell once said: "The pressure o?
public opinion is like the pressure oi
the atmosphere; you can't see lt
but it's sixteen pounds to the square
I inch none the less."
i As soon as the general public be?
lieves that our spelling, is so bad that
something ought to-be done, some?
thing will be done. There are
abundant signs now that the general
public is beginning to take an interest
in the subject. The very natural
prejudice against any modification of
the form of familiar words seems to
be wearing away. People are coming
slowly to see that there are really no
valid arguments against the continu?
ation and acceleration of a process
which has been going on in English
for centuries, as it has been going on
in every other language also. With
the spread of knowledge there can?
not fail to be a weakening of preju?
dice.
And in the meantime, while public
opinion is slowly crystalizing in favor
of simplification, the more enlighten?
ed among the teachers and the su?
perintendents are already taking
si.'i'S in advance. Tn New York, for
example, the board of education ask-i
ed the expert board of superintend- j
ents to report IHM..! the three hundred '
I
words contained in the first list put ;
forth by tile Simplified Spelling heard. !
The board cf superintendents consid- j
ered tin- subject very carefuil. and ;
finally it recommenced the adoption j
. ;" the whole three hundred; And th" j
example set hy Xew Fork is likely to j
iir followed sp^dilv in not a few of j
TT .
the other cities of the Union. ?
Brander Matthews, i
Columbia University. J
New York. July -7, HMM;.
-
Cotton is said tr. he ve rv much
damaged by the borer worm in ?
Orangeburg county.
J^egetablePreparationfor As?
simila ting tteToodandReguIa
ting the S tcmachs andBoweis of
IM?N is/CHILDREN
EromotesT)^cstion,Checrfiil
ness??dBssLContains neither
Opium JMorphine nor rfineral.
NOT NARCOTIC.
Puoificot Seed? "
BockdUSJtx
JtsutS/tad *
f?smotoaat ?
' Sugar >
-fF?aycr.
A perfect Remedy for Constipa?
tion, Sour Stoinach.Diarrhoea,
Worms iConvulsionsJcverish
??ss and Loss OF SLEEP.
Tac Simile Signature of
NEW "YORK
A'f b mohll\'
35 Doses,4 35 Ct vi s
tEXACT COPTCWBAfiPEB.
to
For Infants and Ch??rea?
IIIIIHIW.IM.??!.milli ? M Illili IM ll I il I IM I III ll
The Kind You H?te
Always Bought
Bears the
Uss
For Over
Thirty Years
JUST RECEIVED
Another Car Load of
HORSES
AND
MULES.
Booth Live Stock Co.
Ring up No. 30-That's the Daily Item's Telephone number-*
when you want to place an advertisement that will bring results.
W. A. BOWMAN, Pres. ABE RYTTENBERG, V. Pres^
P. G. BOWMAN, Sec. & Treas.
The Sumter Banking
& Mercantile Con
. 3. c.
?8*#$$^Capital Stock $50,Q00?*?s
Wholesale Grocers, Fertiliz?
ers and Farmers' Supplies.
Sole agents for the celebrated brand of WAU
cox & Gibbs Fertilizers.
We are prepared to quote the very closest
cash or time prices on ail lines of
Groceries, Fertilizers and Farmers*
Supplies,
And invite your investigation before makin^
your arrangements for another year.
Cometo see us. We will save you money,
and give you a hearty, courteous welcome.
Sumter Banking 4 .
ercantiie Company,,
Masonic Building, 2d door from the Postoffice
Sumter, S. C.
AN ADVERTISEMENT PLACED IN THE ADVERTISING
COLUMNS OF THE DAILY ITEM WILL BRING RES?LST.