Historical Newspapers of South Carolina

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

THK SUMTER WATCHMAN, Established April. 1S50. "Be Just and Fear not-Let all the Ends thou Aims't at, be thy Country's, thy God's and Truth's." THE TRUE SOUTHRON. Established Jone 15 & Cosolidated Aug. 2,1881. SUMTER. S. C.. WEDNESDAY. AUGUST 14. 1901. Sew Series-Yoi. XXI. So. 2 Clje SE?tidjunit ?sib Bmilp Published Srary ^TedLnesda?, -Bf IM. Gr. Osteen SUMTER, S. C. TERMS : $1.50 per icnam-in advance. ?DVZBTXSSXSET: One Square first insertion.$1 Bvery subsequent insertion. Contracts for three months, or longer w be made at reduced rates. AU commnnicationB which subserve privfi interests will be charged for&3 advertiemeni Obituaries and tributes of respects will eharzed for. NcLaiirin D?plies to the Coi iiiittee. He Don't See it Like the Senk Senator and Will Not Resign. Paris Mountain, S. C\, August 5th, 1901. To the Democratic Executive Corn-mi' tee, State of South Carolina. Gentlemen: The official notice ( -the action of a majority of your con mittee of July 25th was received b me on August 1st, five days after i had been announced in the newspt pers. This published announcemer was the first notice I had that any ac tion affecting me was to be taken b your committee. I am now official! informed that the majority of yon committee condemns my course in th senate, demands my resignation an undertakes to expel me from the den ocratic party. Twenty-one men hav attempted to usurp the powers of th 90,000 democratic voters of South Care lina and as an incident, in a meetin called for another purpose have hastil endeavored to do what can be don only by solemn proceedings of ira peachment, expressly provided for i: ' the constitution of the United States RESPONSIBLE ONLY TO TH] PEOPLE. I hold my commission from'the dem ocratic voters of South Carolina, I re cognize no authority but theirs, tak no orders from any source but them and shall in due course appeal to then for judgment on my course as a sena tor and my character as a man and ; democrat. Personally I am indifferent to you: action because nobody has made yot my master or censor, and I regare what you have done as merely express ing the malice and the fears of one in? dividual, Senator B. R. Tillman. Bm for this always evil and indecent influ? ence ordinary respcet for the proprie t ties, would probably have prevented the four of you who are my declared competitors for the seat I "now havi the honor to occupy, from attempting to use the power entrusted to you b\ your party to remove a riyal from youl path. ACTION UNFAIR, ABSURD ANE UNDEMOCRATIC. As a citizen and democrat of South Carolina I am mortified by your ac? tion, because it has brought upon the State the condemnation and the ridi? cule of the press and the. public throughout the country. Unhappily, those who are not intimately acquaint? ed with our conditions accept the ac? tion of your majority as representing the intelligence and democracy of oui State*and both are made objects of de? rision. Against this I wish to enter my solemn protest. I shall demon? strate how unfair, absurd and un? democratic your action is : and I shall trust to the democrats of South Caro? lina to repudiate it when the opportu? nity is given them. Your purpose is to deny that opportunity. . STAR CHAMBER PROCEEDINGS. It is in strong contrast with the blatant boast of Senator Tillman at Gaffney to put me on trial before the party on the hustings with himslef as prosecutor. As you know, I sought that test by accepting a proposal of appeal to the people, but the governor saw fit to forbid it. Now Senator Tillman appears as prosecutor against me in my absence and by proceedings like those of the star chamber, which was the most infamous tribunal of English history, and the most abhor? rent to Anglo-Saxon instincts, seeks to include me from the party and its debates and public assemblages. It is your duty, as custodians of the par? ty interests, to seek recruits and to strengthen the party. To save Senator Tillman from staking his rceord, strength and fortunes against mine, you unde retake to exclude me and my friends from the party. Whatever your individual motives may have been, the purport of your action is to facilitate the senator in dodging me and to deny the poeple the opportuni? ty of passing on my position and con? duct. It seems to me the democratic masses of South Carolina are compe? tent to say at the polls whether or not I have been a faithful senator and a consistent democrat. Why should you attempt to prevent them? POLITICAL ASSASSINS. It is no cause for wonder that Sena? tor Tillman should seek to make po? litical assassins of you to avoid open and fair fight. He has climbed to power by venomous abuse of many of the purest men in the State who op? pose him, for which he has always carefully shirked personal responsibil? ity, and on the political lives and for? tunes of those who befriended him while he needed friends. Norris, Tin? dal and Donaldson, men representing earnest purpose and the interesst of the farmers of the State and therefore strong, were used by him to promote his own interests and then thrust aside. Irby, Shell and Farley died despising him because of his treachery to them and to the people. I am now in his way and because he has failed to strike me down he incites you to attempt to strangle me, and at the same time to destroy a white primary to his advocacy of which he owe? much of the best of his early follow? ing. Party principles are fixed and t< the principles of the democratic part; I have been uniformly faithful. Part; policies are determined from time t time by party elections and conven tions, "and no man nor body of mei has the power to say between thos elections what policies shall be th tests of party loyalty. Senator Till man is assuming: the prerogative o supreme boss and dictator to say whi shall or shall not be regarded as ; democrat next year. I do not con cede any such power to him nor t< you. He, nor all of your committee together, has not the power to exclude from candidacy nor the polls at th< democratic primary the humblest citi zen of South Carolina who declare himself to be a democrat and pledge himself to support the party nominees Suppose in 1S90 the executive commit tee of the State had ruled out of th< party all who engaged in the "Farm ers' Movement?" Suppose two year later it had excluded all who favorec the Sub Treasury idea? Such actioi would have been unjust tyrannical an( insulting to thousands of good citizen; and democrats, but not more so thai this proceeding: of yours. WHERE DID TILLMAN GET THI MONEY. In his double character as prosecut ing witness and attorney against me Senator Tillman is reported as savin? before your committee that I hav< voted with the republicans "in impor tant matters" and that he has seen m< conferring with republican senators As I will show by the records he him self ..frequently voted with the republi cans "in important matters" as al other democratic senators have don? from time to time. It is frequently necessary, proper and courteous to con fer with members of the opposit< party, as he knows and as every mai of practical sense knows. These ex pressions of his are attempts to tak< advantages of credulity and ignorance, I do not think there is a man ir South Carolina so ignorant as to b( really deceived by them. He can noi put me under suspicion as he has pm himself by his own acts. ! I have noi in pubilc office retrograded from a, j perhaps, honorable bankruptcy to dis I honorable and unexplained wealth. Hi and I have drawn the same salaries but I have found it impossible to save ! a dollar from mine. I have never, j however, truckled to corporations with the fawning of a tamed spaniel, made speeches against them, then voted for them, and accepted favors as he has done. I have never been the sole boss and buying agent of a newly cre? ated whiskey trust with its rebates o? $60,000 to $70,000 a year, none o? which ever reached the State treasury. I have never had the handling of State bond refunding scheme with $28,000 of commissions never yet accounted for or explained. A year ago Senator Tillman went into Nof&h Dakota and made speech? es advov vting the re-election of a re? publican ' Senator-Mr. Pettigrew. Senator Tillman and this Senator were prominent in preventing by filli brusteing tactics a vote on the subsidy bill. The newspapers said that Mr. Hill, head of the Northern Pacific lobby against the subsidy bill, gave Senator Tillman's friend and associate a "tip" which paid him $450,000 in the stock market. Birds of a feather, gentlemen of the committee, always flock together. TILLMAN NOT A DEMOCRAT. Has Senator Tillman, prosecuting attorney against my democracy, ever failed to abuse democrats and democ? racy? Do you know that in the last two democratic national conventions he has supported the nomination of Republicans? In 1896 he favored Sena? tor Teller for President an old line republican and one of the bitterest foes of the South in reconstruction days. He had himself appeared be? fore the convention as a competitor of J. Bryan and been ignominiously snowed under. In 1900 he was for Towne, also a republicn, for vice pres? ident. Is he the man to be supreme i arbiter and judge of what is democracy in South Carolina? GIVE THE YOUNG MEN A CHANCE. In the Senate I have labored, as the records will show, to broaden the pros? perity of the country, to promote the interests of my own people, to spread civilization, to enlarge and increase opportunity for our young meu and to stimulate enterprise. His whole polit? ical course and method have been to tear down, to abuse and oppose, to blight and restrain, to bite where he dared and to fawn where he feared or sought favor. I shall ask the people to contrst the records and shall claim my right as a free man, a born and reared democrat and a Senator from South Carolin, to do it regardless of the orders of twenty-one members of the executive committee. I shall ask the people to decide between the man who has trid to help cotton factories, open highways of commence and to so command the democratic party as to command for it the confidence and re? spect of the business and laboring ele? ments north and south ; and that of the man whose conduct and record has been to sink the party to disrepute and impotence. I shall ask them to say whether they prefer the Senator who has tried to retain for South Car? olina the honor and dignity won by a long line of illustrious sons and glori? ous deeds, or the Senator who has postured as buffoon and bully and who proclaimed on the floor of the Senate that he represented a constituency of ballot box staffers and murderers who wanted their shave of the stealage. He is now in a Northern State hold? ing up our people as negro murders and ballot box thieves. TARIFF SUBSIDIES AND EXPAN? SION. You ha\e undertaken to condemn and expel and depose me, not only without a hearing but without evi? dence. Upon what ground are my good faith as a Senator and my fideli? ty as a democrat assailed? Is it on the tariff? None of you of the committee can prove to the people that the demo eratic party is a free trade party. 1 has opposed a tariff for protectio only, but as early as 1797 we had protectirve tariff and we have never i the one hundred and four years sine known free trade. General Hancock the party nominee for president i 1SS0, regarded the tariff as a loci question. Samuel J. Randall, fe years the party leader and speaker c the house, was a protectionist. In e\ ery congress where the question ha been presented numbers of democrat have voted against and helped to kii free trade. I have contended th a Southern products should be put o: equality with others, and in 1897 fought to have rice, pine lumber ar* cotton protected. The cry of ' ' Repn: Hean" was raised against me then but the people, before whom the issu was squarly put, endorsed me by ' & overwhelming vote. Are you now un dertaking to reverse that verdict? I have favored ship subsidies. It i a great question and one, I submi t on which the people of this State ar competent to pass after hearing ful argument. The subject has never bee] discussed before them although it is o vast importance to the prosperity o this State. The purpose of the sub sidy is to develop the building am operation of great fleets of America! ships. It touches the interest of ou sea ports, of our lumber industries, o all our mnufacturing enterprises am our great agricultural products. It i a question on which some of the ables democrats of the house and senate ar divided. I most humbly submit tha it is not in order for twenty-one mem bers of our committee to rule tha the democratic masses of South Caro lina shall not at their campaign meet ings heacr this matter of vital inter?s to them discussed ; and that the peo pie of the sea coast cities, who woul< like to see new tides of commero brought to their harbors and the lum bermen and owners of forest lands wh( would be glad to sell material fo: more ships, are to be thrown neck anc heels out of the party because thej favor ship subsidies. Senators Carlisle, Pugh and Morgan voted for a subsid] bill which has been in force ten year? and which has hepled our Braziliar trade, in a measure at least. Aw they not democrats, according to th( decision of Senator Tillman and you] committee? I believe that it is our duty to de? velop the new territory, which has come into our possession along com? mercial and industrial lines, to civilize them, and make them the equal of oui own States in material prosperity. Sen tor Tillman would leave them, after we have deprived them of the protection of Spain to a hopeless struggle as an independent nation without resources or self protection. Fortunately for us the records show that in building them up, we are go? ing to benefit our own country. I want to give that territory the best form Of government in the world, he does not want to give it any form of government at all. He says "free silver or bust. " I say the American people h ve settled that question at the ballot box. I am for a sound currency and constant employment for all who desire work at remunerative wages. This we cannot have without an outlet for our surplus products on equal terms with all of our competitors in the markets of the world. Do you think the energetic, live, progressive young business man of the South, will long permit the ca? bals of a few scheming politicians to stand between him and the attainment of these glorious ends? If this is not democrcy, then gentlemen, I invite you to join hands with me in making it so. These are the leading questions on which I understand my democracy and loyalty have been assailed. The records give me little light as to what further ground there may be for your action. Allow me to summarize them briefly. In the first session of the 55th con? gress Senator Tillman and myself vot? ed together in 148 of 150 yea and nay votes. I voted against him for protection to the farmers on an amendment to the tariff bill, proposed by Senator Jones, of Arkanss, present chairman of the democratic executive committee. Pos? sibly you may reconvene your commit? tee and read him out of the party. I voted with Jones. Vest, Bacon, Bate, Berry, Daniel, Mills, Morgan and all the other democrats, except Senators Tillman and McEnery who voted with the republicans. It was a straight party vote. On another amendment to the same bill I voted with the demo? crats. Senator Tillman was the one democrat voting with the republicans. See Congressional Record, vol. 30, paee 1577. In the second session of the same congress Senator Tillman and myself voted together on 82 of 95 roll calls. One vote on which we differed was on a motion to adjourn intended to defeat a resolution calling upon the Presi? dent to intervene in Cuba. Senator Tillman voted with the Republicans to adjourn and the motion prevailed by one vote. I voted with the Demo? crats. The other votes on which we differed were unimportant and not party questions, the par? ties dividing on ali. I fa? vored the acceptance of the Ha? waiian Islands along with such Demo? crats as Gorman, Kyle, Money, Morgan, Pettus and Sullivan, and he, with the other democrats and some.republicans were opposed to it. On page 4858, vol. 31 of the Record it is shown that I voted, with all the democrats but three and all the repub? licans, fora bill to provide for arbi? tration of disputes between railway companies and their employes. Sena? tor Tillman was one of the three against it. We also differed on a bill Erohibiting intoxicating liquors to e sold in the territory of Alaska. I favored and he opposed the prohibi? tion. Possibly he had views on a dis? pensary and rebates there. On a vote to recommit the conference report on the River and Harbor bill I voted for the recommitment with such Democrats as Chilton, Heitfeldt, Ken? ney, Mills, Rawlins and Turner. He voted against with such republicans as Allison Burrows, Cullom, Davis, El kins, Hale, Hawley, Loge, Perkins, Platt and Quay. In the first session of the 56th Con? gress Senator Tillman and I voted to? gether on 67 ont of 71 roll calls. In each of the four cases in which we i .differed the parties were divided. The most notable of these was on the ad? mission of Senator Qnay. I voted for it with Senators Daniel, Kenney, Mc Enery, Morgan and Tilaferro, "demo? crats. He opposed with most of the democrats and eleven republicans, in? cluding Hanna, Platt, Foraker, Gal linger and Hale. In the last session of the same con? gress Senator Tillman and myself vot? ed together in most of the 57 votes taken. On a resolution requiring the President to issue in ten days a pro? clamation disclaiming any purpose to exercise sovereignty over the Philip? pines I voted "nay" with Foster, Kyle, Lindsay, Morgan and Sullivan, democrats. Senator Tillman was one of 22 favoring it. On an amendment declaring that it was not the purpose of the United States to exercise per? manent control over the Philippines, Senator Tillman with most of the democrats and Senator Hoar republi? can, voted "aye." I with Senators Foster and Lindsav, democrats, voted "nay." On the final passage of the army bill we differed. I voted for it and had with me Senators Foster, Lindsay, Morgan and Sullivan. We voted to? gether for amendments extending the constitution of the United States over the Philippines on strict party lines. On the question of governing our outlying possessions he and I voted together and it is this that determines the matter of imperialism, not the pos? session of the territory. I voted to take possession and rule justly. He voted not to take possession but to rule. He and I voted together on all party questions except those concerning the Philippines which my judgment, exer? cised as a Senator and a representative of the people, told me was a question of foreign relations, involving entire ly new problems and therefore not properly a party question and on which my political judgment told me the country was practically united. The democratic party was wrecked by being forced in this mater into a policy opposed to its own traditions, and the overwhelming sentiment of the country against my protest and that of other loyal democrats. Devel? opments have proved that those who maintained that the pacification of the islands was impossible, that the people would never accept our control and that their retention would be un? profitable and disastrous were wrong. I am ready to go before the people of South Carolina and show them the facts. Do you undertake to say that I must resign and put myself out of my party because I favored uphold? ing the dignity of the American flag after its troops had been fired on, and opposed a cowardly abandonment of these islands to chaos? Is the proposi? tion to punish me, because I did not believe Aguinaldo to be the equal of George Washington or concede that the Filipinos could instantly and unguided organize for themselves a stable government and a high civiliza? tion? LET HIM DENY THIS RECORD. I have been at some pains to show from the records, by volume and page, that where Senator Tillman and I differed in congress it was not on party questions : and that he voted with the republicans at least as often as I did, and that in every case where we divided I had with me democrats who possess the confidence of the party throughout the country and whose democracy not even his reckless and slanderous insolence dares to assail. I could go further and show other instances in which he has voted against the great majority of his party -notably in the Platt amendment to the Cuban bill. He had declared his purpose to oppose and fight this to the last ditch ; but he voted for it. Some of his present newspaper friends said at the time that he did it to curry favor with the Charleston vote, hop? ing to trade the exposition bill through. If that was the case, he was the shallow victim of a political green goods game and sold himself for saw? dust. But I have said enough, I think, to prove to you and to the public that you-like many others who have risen and gone before you-have permitted yourselves to be made tools of by Sen? ator Tillman, to promote his own base and brutal ends and to protect him from a struggle he fears to face, be-1 cause he knows that the facts and arguments are all against him. His hope is to keep those facts and argu? ments from the people of South Caro? lina. Accept my condolence on the un? happy and absurd situation into which this would be dictator has led you. You may be assured that he will find a crevice through which to crawl, leaving you to stand the fire when it becomes hot, and that having used you he will cast you aside like many he has formerly used. I desire to proclaim to the world that you do not represent the intelli? gence, the democracy or the people of South Carolina ; and to you and Sena? tor Tillman that he has never been my master and shall never be : that he shall not escape the vengeance that must surely fall upon him when the people have been made to under? stand his motives, his methods, his debased character and his shameful record. To that grand conservator of free government, the reserved patriot? ism and common sense of the people, I make appeal, against partisan intol? erance and tyranny. Very respectfully, Jno. Lowndes McLaurin. Lincoln, Neb., Aug. 7.-Meetings were held tonight by the Democratic, Populist and Free Silver Republican State Central committees and fusion of the three parties was practically argeed upon, the State conventions of all being fixed for Sept. 17, at Lincoln. W. J. Bryan addressed the Democratic and Populist committees and expressed himself strongly in favor^of fusion. DISPENSARIES FOR THE EXPOSITION Director General Asks For Num? ber, on the Grounds. Columbia, Aug. 8.-Mr. J. H. Averill, director of the Charleston ex? position, and Mr. W. H. Welch of the county board of control appeared be? fore the directors of the State dispen? sary yesterday to consult as to what methods can be pursued to have dis? pensaries located on the exposition grounds. The board promised its co? operation and insisted that it is an isous to help make the exposition a success. No definite proposal was submitted -that must be arranegd with the county board. But it was intimated by the State board that it sanctions the establishment of six or eight dis? pensaries on the exposition grounds, such dispensaries to sell beer and light wines. The dispensers must be regu? larly appointed and must be bonded officers. The board thought that a clerk could be elected to have general super? vision of these dispensaries, but each dispenser must have an individual permit. Mr. Averill asked if a beer dispen? sary could be operated in connection with a restaurant. He was informed that such a proceeding would not conform to the letter of the law. However a beer dispenser could have his booth adjoining that of restau? rateur, and patrons could give their orders for beer to the cafe waiters. In the opinion of the board the wait? ers could be ' ' servants of the guests, not servants of the restaurant-keep? er, ' ' and for that reason could fetch the foaming beer for the thirsty guests of the restaurant.-The State. GIVE CUBA A CHANCE. Havana, Aug. 78.-The Union of Tobacco Buyers of Havana was recent? ly asked by the Merchants' Union to give an opinion as to the duties levied in the United States upon Cuban to? bacco. The reply was to the effect that duties on cigars should be reduc? ed to 82.50 per pound irrespective of value, and that the duties on wrap? pers and fillings should be reduced 20 to 25 cents respectively per pound. A long preamble asserts that Cuba if she does not obtain concessions to which she has a perfect right in view of the fact that she is under the eco? nomic as well as the political protec? tion of the United States should ask for annexation. "This the United States would grant," the preamble goes on to say '1 as it would be in con? formity with the desire of a maajori ty of the American people. Thus the successful opposition of the sugar and tobacco interests of the United States to granting concessions to Cuba would only result in the ruin of these inter? ests, since with annexation Cuba would have free trade, and this would mean the overthrow of the sugar and tobacco industries in the United States.'' GUNBOAT SENT TO PANAMA. Isthmus Must be Kept Open Decision of U.S. Government. Washington, Aug. 7.-An order was issued by the acting secretary of the navy for the gunboat Machias, now at the Boston navy yard, to proceed without delay to Hampton Roads and there to prepare for departure to Co? lon, near the eastern terminus of the Panama-American railroad. At the navy department it is explain? ed that this movement has been order? ed with a view to having the Ma? chias take observations in the vicinity of the isthmus. In announcnig the action of the department it was offi? cially stated that "it is deemed need? ful that a United States war vessel be in that vicinity at this time." The j order to the Machias followed a con? ference held at the navy department j between Acting Secretary of State i Adee, and Acting Secretary of the Navy Hackett. Mr. Adee received the dispatch from Consul Gudger last night, stating that the revolutionists had held up a train for an hour at Marachin on the line of the railroad across the isthmus, and only about 15 miles from Panama city. While this was not regarded as threatening an in- j terruption of traffic or giving any ground for intervention by the Uni? ted States, yet it was deemed advisa? ble by the" officials that one of our ships shouuld be in the neighborhood in order that suitable observations could be made and steps taken to meet any serious emergency that might arise. For the present officials do not believe there will be any need of land? ing marnies. The commander of the Machias, Lieut. Commander Mason is regarded as an officer .of tact and abil? ity and beside this he has had recent experience in West Indina waters, hav? ing been in command of the Scorpion when she made her recent trip to La Gui ra to keep watch on American in? terests in Venezuela. The Machias is a gunboat of 1,177 tons displacement with twin screws and good steam capacity. She has eight four inch guns in her main bat? tery, six rapid fire guns and one au? tomatic gun. Her run to the isthmus depends somewhat on the length of her stay at Hampton Roads, but it is be? lieved she will be ready to proceed with little or no delay, in which case the trip will take about ten days or two weeks. We have dallied so long in the mat? ter of the connection with the Sea? board Air Line that we have lost our opportunity. We did not grasp the forelock and now will be lucky if we even get a hair out of the tail. Sum? ter is going to get the road now. Sumter is feeling and feeling strongly the beneficial effects of the recent de? velopment in her railroad facilities. Her people have built the roads and they are enjoying the fruits of their enterprise.-Florence Times. POETIC JUSTICE. A Jerseyman who went ont for a pleasure drive with his sweetheart not long ago received a needed though rather severe lesson on the necessity of being humane to animals in this day and generation. It was very a hot day, and when the drive was about half over the horse became balky. The driver thereupon lost his temper and gave the animal an unmerciful beating. Then the trouble began. A constable saw him and promptly ar? rested him for cruelty to animals He was unable to pay the money, and his companion settled the business for him. Then she went home and wrote him a note, and this was what it said : "When a man will so brutally beat a horse and so easily lose his temper, a woman marrying him would take the chance of the same treatment." And the rest of the note released him from the engagement. Most people will be of the opinion that the young lady in question did what was exactly right, and that she was fortunte in discovering the dis? position of her fiance before instead of after marriage. Insensibility to the pain of another is not a trait which is particularly desirable in either a husband or a wife. While, of course, it is not to be inferred that every man who will beat his horse will also beat his wife, cruelty to animals so viti? ates the moral nature that those per? ceptions upon which a sense of justice depends are blunted. The intimacy of marriage is so close that happiness can only exist where there is mutual forbearance, together with a certain sensitiveness to the feelings of others. The man who does not possess this sensitiveness may not be actually cruel to either wife or children, so far as physical maltreatment is concerned, but he will say and do things which are quite as brutal as a blow with a whip would be. There are a dozen considerations which are likely to restrain him from wife-beating-the opinions of his neighbors, custom, fear that his wife may invoke the law, fear of retaliation by her relatives, or merely the fact that it is not usual for American husbands to express their sentiments in that way. But if his nature is essentially cruel he will find ways to torture those dependent upon him which are worse than physical pain. The true test of a man's char? acter is not to be found in his actions when he is restrained by public senti? ment or fear of consequence. He is his real self when he is free to act, to indulge meanness, or passion, or cruelty, tow?rd some creature which cannot retaliate and has no means of defence. The Jerseyman who is the unenviable hero of the incident above recorded was subjected to this test, and apparently he failed. He may have had an idea that by his lack of consideration for his horse he was showing a manly and stern strength of character which would impress tha girl in the seat beside him. Some men have an idea that women rather admire those who are capable of cruelty. These men are trying to fit sixteenth century ideas into twentieth century civiliza? tion. It cannot be done. It is true that women admire a brave man, and often the man in question is a soldier or hunter, but there is a very fine distinction between the brave man and the man who is ever ready to inflict pain. What the modern girl sees to admire in the soldier is not his will? ingness to shoot another man, but his readiness to be shot himself : not his murderous impulses, but his sacrifice of personal safety. The kind of wom? an who would like a man after seeing him act cruelly toward a helpess ani? mal is not fit for a civilized country. -i i - ? Florence Hit by Freshets. Florence, Aug. 9.-Florence County has been hit hard by freshets this sum? mer. Three thousand . dollars will have to be expended on Lynch's river bridge and causeway alone. Besides this, countless small bridges have been wrecked, and the roads put in such condition as to require the constant attention of the chain gang, reenforc? ed by several paid laborers. To meet this "increase in expenses the county will have to borrow $6,000 to run it's affairs until 1901 taxes begin to come in. Florence county has been run on a cash basis for several years and a con? tinuation of this method being desired is another reason for the action of the commissioners in borrowing money. Supervisor McBride will negotiate with the State Sinking Fund commis? sion for tho loan. Dr. FL B. Rhett Dead. Charleston, Aug. 7.- Dr. Robert B. Rhett, one of the leading physicians of this city died at 9 o'clock tonight af? ter several weeks illness, of tyhpoid fever. Dr. Rhett was one of the most progressive members of the medical profession in the State and his reputa? tion as a surgeon was of the highest^ throughout the South. We were shown a letter this morning - from Robt. Wilson, Jr., M. D., Bac? teriologist to Board of Health, Charles? ton, S. C., to Mayor E. O. McCreight, saying that he had examined the specs imens of Camden artesian water,. Hamlet and Sumter ice used in Cam? den and that he found them absolutely pure and healthful. He states that of course these waters should be examin? ed frequently as the water may at any time become polluted.-Camden Mes? senger. Norfolk, Va., Aug. 7.-Lieut. Com? mander James C. Cresap, U. S. N., of the inspection board at the Norfolk navy yard, died at the naval hos? pital here at an early hour this morning of blood poisoning,, which was caused by the dye of a stocking absorbed in a slight abrasion on the foot. A wife and two sons survive him. The body will be taken to Annapolis for burial.