Historical Newspapers of South Carolina

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

PITHY AND BOINTED. Mr. Ehame's Reply to Criticism Mr Editor : I see that Mr Sanders I.?3 been spilling ink instead of gore about me. and I most say a few words. I hardly think that he means all that be says or implies in bis letter, becaosa I take it for granted that he has common sense, and therefore be ost know that nothing which I wrote should ne twisted or distorted into any defence of Cooper. He deserved all the panishm?nt his physical frame could endure. But I feel sorry and ashamed for our people-for those who were trying to rival Cooper in brutality. If those who criticiae me for opposing mur? der by 'ynching, cannot?distinguish between opposition to lawlessness and sympathy with criminal-well so much the worse ,fo them. 1 am sorry for their stupidity or malice whichever it may be. I believe murder, whether ^committed by a fiend incarnate, ^such a9 Cooper was, or by a mob. such as krtled Cooper, to be a grave crime. We hare high authority for soch an opinion. God so ^pronounced it from Sinai ; and the beat and wisest men of world, .those who have been engaged century after century in building np the frame work of society and adjusting laws for the government of mankind, bow in humble submission to the Almighty's fiat. Mr. Sanders and bis friends think differently. Both the Bible and the constitutions of all civilized countries must give way when they come in contact with opinions of a mob ; of a mob that is to act as judge, jury and exe? cutioner. Of course my critic thinks tbat i this excited, furious and passionate crowd is eminently fitted for such important duties. I have not attempted to aaswer Mr. San? ders' letter. It is a remarkable document, bat I am too busy to take the time, even if I bad toe ability, to explain assumptions, cer? tainly not from wbat I said, but from Mr. Sanders' fertile brain. I have no quarrel with those who do not agree with my ideas, but I deeply regret that SO macy whom I have ev?ry reason to be? lieve are good men, should in this closing lustrum of the nineteenth century go back to the primeval methods of barbarism in pun? ishing crime. . W. F. RHAME WHAT COL. RHAME THINKS. More Opinions Concerning the Lynching of Simon Cooper. Mr. Editor: Io the Item of the 8tb inst., yon say, among other things, that 1 'the kill? ing of Cooper adds but another to the list of horrors that have occurred in Sumter County this week." Io the Item of the 11th, you say. along with many other things, that "it (Cooper's killing) was Inst for blood, noth? ing more nor less/' that it was "tigerish, not human; savagery, not civilization ; crime, not respect for enforcement of law; bliad and irresponsible slaughter, not justice." Yon say also "that the spirit tbat prompted the mob that committed this bloody outrage against law and civilizatioa was an outcrop? ping of the identical latent savage instinct, present in most men, that possessed Simon Cooper himself when he slaughtered those who crossed bis path." No wonder, therefore, that you declare, in the same issue, that the citizens who attended . the Magnolia anas meeting' ''should hate made haste to clear themselves of the im pu tation that thev proposed committing the : crowning act of savagery" by "burning the mangled remains of Cooper, had the body been sent to Magnolia." I can only quote a very small part of what you have bad to say in the Item on the subject of Cooper's butcheries and his death at the bands of the Citizens of Sumter Cocnty, but your utter- ] anees in print are all before the public, have j been read, and re-read perhaps, and I only | quote here some of the worst things you have ? said about your fellow-citizens. It does not j require any effort of the mind to find the log- i leal conclusion, necessarily deducible from , what you have said, takiog into considera? tion everything good, bad and indifferent. What you have said means simply this, That Simon Cooper was "a fiend, a devil in? carnate witb a tigerish lust for blood, a rav? isher of female virtue, and richly merited death"-and that a large uumber of the good citizens of Sumter County who pot this fiend and ravisher to death, and a great many f others from this and other sections who ap- i proved the killing, and denounced the criti- j cisms of the Item are aloog in the same cate- , gory with" savages, murderers and fiends. ( That they are controlled by the identical sa v- , age instincts and lost for blood that possessed , Simon Cooper himself, when he committed ) wholesale murder and rape. This, I repeat, ,. is what yon say sir, of the people of Sumter , County-at least many of ths best of them. Why then, if there is truth in your declara- , tiona, should not these fiends be bang? Sure- , ly it is not because the Item's editor would ? have to be both jory and executinner. Now, sir, since you are so good at discov- | ering motives (of inst for blood and savagery) j suppose you explain what motive possessed j the Item's editor wben.be offered to be one of , a party to lynch a colored man m Magnolia who was only charged with aiding Cooper , and helping to keep bim hidden and posted, , between the kiliiog of Davis, on January 1st, , and the butchery of the Wilsons and Smith '. on fie J th. You were there, sir, rifle in j hand, arni you told the writer that burning ) was too good for Coope,r and you distinctly offered to be one to go from the scene of the j Wilson murder to Magnolia to lynch the , party referred to. How comes it theo when t others o*ly carry out io part your idea ofv, inflicting punishment aod death on the mur- , derer and "ravisher of female virtue" that they are such "tigerish savages, lusting for blood." What wrought this wonderful change in the Item's editor, that after being engaged for two days in a chase conducted by "savages lusting for blood", be became angelic as soon as the first shot was fired and ran back to his desk to hurl against others cbarees which he considered damning, if be- ? lieved ? Such reckless and damnable charges ; against one's neighbors and feilow citizens, ia view of the fact3 and circumsances, are unworthy of any brave or truthful man, and constitute the most mischievous slander ever uttered against any portion of the citizens of Sumter county. In the killing of Cooper no law, human or divine was violated-save technically hu?an law You knew full well, sir, that it was settled, during the hunt for Cooper, throughout the State, much less Sumter county, that Cooper would be at once put to death and never tried by a regular court. He bad verily been tried and condemned to death long before he i was caught, and, as the Item's editor says, no doubt about his guilt. It was unreasona? ble in any man or number of men to ask that Cooper oe carried to jail-it would have j taken all the troops in the State to guard j him, and the three gentlemen (brave men j though they be) wbo undertook to promise Cooper protection from immediate death did ! not use their judgmect, for they should have known that it would be impossible to save his life, without the loss of many other lives. You have said that escape was impossible. That is the veriest stuff". Cooper knew that longer resistance was out of the question, and he only parleyed, as is plain, to give a little time and lay a scheme for getting among the crowd without being first shot down, and every circumstance proves beyond a doubt that be had a plan by which he hoped to escape, and he stood a good chance. He came out, not unarmed, according to agreement with the three gentlemen, (who ad no right to make such an agreement) but I armed with pistol and rt?Z)r concealed, and I refused to be tied. So it is perfectly plain ; to a tty one wt o cares to see, that he meant to ! pick his time hod place on tnr *ay to Sum? ter, slay some o^e, and, in the confusion j escape You owe the people of Sumter county your nest endeavors from here on to make amends for the mischief you have done. Respectfully, J. A. RHAME. Magnolia, S. C., Jany. 16, 1897. The above article calls for but brief notice, since Col. Rbame, alone with some others, CHonoror will oot comprehend the position of the editor of this paper io reference to the killing of Simon Cooper. We simply con? demned the manner in which Cooper was killed, and have not nor do not now offer any excuse for Coober, for whom burning was too good. There were tTo stages in the killing of Cooper, and io everything that bas beeu 'written by tbe editor the dis io ct ion between the two has been carefully made. First, 'he shooting of Cooper afier he surrendered and bad bis bands above his head. This was not justifiable, but may be excused on the grouod of uncontrollable passioo and ignor? ance of the protoise of protection Second, the banging and shooting at Green Swamp when tbe negro iwas in i dying condition. It was this latter act in tbe bloody drama that was condemned*in tbe language quoted by Col. Rbame. Not one word do we retract or regret, for a more bloody, a more useless, a more cowardly act is not chronicled. If to hang and mutilate this negro wheo be was helpless was so honorable and praiseworthy ?s Col. Rbame's remarks would lead one to believe, why do not those who participated io it declare themselves and have tb*ir names placed-on record? Instead, they keep them? selves unknown. What motive possessed the editor when he offered to go with Col. Rhame, when Col. Rhame came to bim and said that there were three negroes at Magnolia who were just as bad as Cooper, bad aided and abetted bim and needed ''handling V The same motive tbat possessed him wheo be left his business and went to Magnolia on the day tbat tbe Wilsons were killed and the same that pos? sessed bim when be went to Jake Dargan's house io pursuit of Simon Cooper : A be? lief that the community should be protected against further outrages. Col. Rbame first suggested tbe Magnolia negroes; and to tbe best of tbe writer's recollection and belief, Col. Rhame never once said he wished to lynch those "colored men in Magnolia who were only charged (Col. Rhame making the charge) with aiding Cooper " He merely wanted to "handle" them, and one gentle? man with whom th? writer talked proposed to run tbe negroes out of tbe community nothing more. If Col. Rhame's memory will serve bim correctly he will recall that when a crowd, who were rather over-excited fromja two free use of liquor, began talking about killing negroes that be and the writer both advised against any such rash proceedings. Col.Rbame'sopinion heretofore has bad some weight with the wn'er, but iu his present excited and unreasonable frame of mind his unjustifiable personal strictures give us no concern whatever, for we believe that a fuil knowledge of the facts and calm deliberation will convice not only him but many other, of the error of their present position We have condemned what we deemed unlawful aod miscbevioos to society, and stating facts as we saw them them, simply and without favor, we are content to stand by the record and let thinking and reasonable men be our * judges.- ED Underwriters. MAGNOLIA, S. C., Jan. 16, 1897. Mr. Editor: Your criticisms, which refer to and directly concern us, aloog with a vast majority of tbe citizens of our county, seem to us not only to be harsh, bot actually vicious, therefore, we approve what the fore? going article by Col. J. A Rhame contains, Believing that it is within the limits of legiti? mate criticism. Resoectfully yours, Jno. M. Miller, J. S Potts, F. S. Potts, J. F. McIntosh, S. Copeland, T. N. Griffio., It is not known what Mr. John M. Miller, md the other geotlemeo who underwrite Col. Rhame'e article, consider the "vicious" por? tion of our remares concerning the Simon dooper lynching. If it be the remarks con ?eroing tbe part the Magnolia people took in the affair, we beg to remiad them tbat the jaid remarks were made by the Magoolia cor? respondent of the Columbia Register. If we were vicious io our attack, it consisted io ipplyiog a Magnolia man's remarks after tbe Wilson, murder instead of before. If the viciousness consisted io printing the rumor that Cooper'3 body would have been burned bad it reached Magnolia, theu we have no excuse to offer, save that Magoolia men, fresh from tbe scene, gave us the information, and that since then two Magoo? lia men have expressed their gratification that Cooper's body was not sent to Magnolia ; "for," said they, "while it was not the inten? tion of some of us to boro it, there were threats of doing ao, and there is no telling what might have happened." We do not ?oocede that there was the least viciousness io any article we have written, and, further? more, the citizens of Magoolia should recol? lect that they first attacked the editor of the [tem. He merely condemned the manner in which Cooper was killed in. general terms, md forthwith the people of Magnolia de? nounced bim. Then we made our defence, i^d, io doing so, made an exhibit of those who 60 roundly censured us in a series of resolutions.-ED One Other Lynching. Mr. Editor : ? desire to correct an error you made in speaking of the-'Cooper Lynching." You say: "It is a blow to the fair fame of 3nmter County, within whose borders a lynching never before occurred." It is cot forgotten by the people of this ectioc that a lynching "for usual offence" took place at Pisgah Church three miles from here some ten years a^o. Respectfully, H. E. L. PEEBLE3. Smithville, S. C., Jan. 17. 1897. [When writing the sentence quoted by our esteemed correspondent, Col. Peebles, the lynching referred to recurred to memory, but upon inquiry we were assured that the affair took place in Kershaw county, and that'in additiou the offender was shot down while attempting to shoot his pursuers. If these be the facts, it could not be classeed as a lynching whether it occurred in Kershaw or Sumter county. The statement of" Col. Peebles, however, satis?es us that we were misinformed.-ED. -mi:Kl - -cn II. Lamar Locals. LAMAR, S. C., Jany. 17, 1897. Mrs. Maggie Odom, wife of Mr. J. B. Odom, died on the 16th of pneumouia, and was buried on the 17th at Newman Swamp Cemetery. Mrs. Odom leaves a large family and a host ot friends to mourn her loss. Presiding Eider E. T Hodges preached at tbe Methodist church on the 17th. at eight j o'clock p. m. There will be an election held at an early day to decide the question of a dispensary at this place. Hon. J. A. Perritt came home from Co? lumbia on tbe ISth, but will return ia time for bu8inea3on tbe 18th. 'Wanted For Curiosity and' For Identification E'i"or I'ero : No?ioog your mean insinu ticn, on the 11th ios:*n:, ? E. Keels, S. Copeh-.d', J. A. Rhatue, T N Griffin, E. M. , Beac, J A. B.rr.i ar,d W. D. Gamble, ia j "mass meeting," do declare that they care j nothing whatever for the opinion of the i Item's editor, but they do regard the opinion j of good people who read the Item. There- | fore they see proper to say. 1. That they were parties to the request for the body of "Simon Coober." 2. That there were two motives only by which they were ac:uated, that one moiive was simple c;riosity of some who had never seen the "killer and ravisher," to see the body of such a demon. The other motive was to identify the body, as was distinctly stiled iu the telegram, and thereby quiet BS I far as possible, the fear felt by many, some ot them heine ladies in an almost dying cccdi t;on. others defenseless women and children, also some men-even brave men-tbat it might be some other fugitive, and not the "devil incarnate," who was killed, or, ac? cording to the Item, murdered. 3. That it would have been to them a mat? ter of indifference had the Item's editor seen fit to burn Cooper's body, beginning before he was shot or banged, according to bis pre? vious idea of Cooper's deserts. 4. lt ?3 not true that no effort was made to catch Cooper until the night before be butchered the Wileoo family and made threats against others. 5. We believe, a? subsequent events proved, that if the citizens of Magnolia had tried to arrest Cooper, as they bad no warrant or au? thority to do, when be killed Davi9 on Jan 1st, Cooper would have b?en to kill ; and then the Item's editor would have called the killing a "tigerish lust for blood." D. E. KEELS, S. COPELAND, J A. RH A.VIE, T N. GRIFFIN, E. M. BEAN, J. A BYRD, W. D. GAMBLE. [The foregoing is given place without com? ment, further than that it is the desire of The Daily Item to give all concerned the op? portunity to vindicate their course as well as to duly ventilate their opinions. That the terms used in reference to this paperare harsh and out of place, they will doubtless concede on due reflection The editor of the Item ?3 out of the city to-day, bot he has already fully evpiaiced hi3 course in this lamentable affair ] WEDGEFIELD NOTES. The recent depression in cotton prices, seera3 not to have discouraeed our farmers, judgine by the quautity of fertilizers being distributed at this point. "Grippe" still holds a firm grasp on our community. Scarcely a family has escaped. Dr. Dwight, our resident physician, is kept busy these days. Mrs. J. H. Aycock is suffering with pr*u mooia and Mrs. Anna Cain is also very sick. Rev. W J. Dowell and family are com? fortably quartered in the new patsonage, which is oow nearly completed. When a suitable b-irn,. stable and fences are added, the place will assume a very homelike ap? pearance. A recent entertainment given for the beoe fit of the parsonage, was well patronized and proved quite a success. The graded school is progressing finely under the efficient management of Prof. J. A. Merritt and his accomplished assistant Miss Elise Singleton. Will Cooper, a negro, was arrested here Friday for a crime committed lu Manning, to which place he was remanded by Judge Kelley. We are glad that "our Cooper" failed to develop the desperate characteristics of "Simon." Mr. F. F. Covington and family of Marion, are spending a few week3 with Mrs. J. H. Aycock. Mrs. M. R. Brown and Miss E. P. Duncan, of Barnwell, are visiting Mr. John B. Ryan. Mrs. Chas. Griffin, of Pinewood, is spend? ing a short time with her parents, Mr and Mrs. W. M. Moor.e. Mr. Frank Tbomae, Sr , of N. C., is on an extended visit to his soo Mr. F. E . Thomas. Messrs. H E. and J. D. Odou, of Roc'iy Mount, N. C , have been on a recent visit to Mr. J. R. Odom. STYLUS. Jan. 16, 1897. Another New County. The election for the new county of Bam? berg, of which the growing and progressive town of Bamberg will be the county seat, was held yesterday and resulted in a victory for the new county. The vote stood 877 for the new county and 254 against. BENJAMAN HODGES. Death of a Highly Esteemed North? erner, who Once Lived and Mar? ried in Sumter. A telegram was received on Tuesday. Jan. 12tb, announcing the death of Mr. Benjamin Hodges at bis home, io Top?fieId, Mass. Mr. Hodges come here from the North just after the war and planted very successfully for eighteen years. He wa3 very much liked and highly respected by everyone and gen? eral regret was felt when be moved back to Massachusetts a tew years ago. He married Miss Reynolds, the eldest daughter of the Ute Dr. Mark Reynolds of Stateburg, wbo with two children, survives him. Mr. and Mrs Hodges came here just before Christmas on a visit to Mrs Reynolds, when be became so unwell that they were obliged to go home. His death was not unexpected, as hi3 health has been very poor for some years. Burned Alive. DALLAS, TEX., Jan. 16.-Fire com? pletely destroyed the Buckner's Orphan booie near here early this morning. Sixteen children were cremated and nine injured, three of them fatally. All of the dead, except one ^ere buried this evening in the cemetery home. Rev. Mr. Buckner, manager of the home, officiated. The home physicians are io attendance on thc injured. All the farmers in thc vicinity turned out and assisted in making coffins, digging graves and burying the victims. There were 147 toys and more than 100 girls in the horne, but all are accounted for. Lara? fhides when artistically made of crepe tissue are things of beau'y. If you want to make shades to beautify your homes. H. G. Osteen & Co. can supply the materials. A large stock of crepe tissue in tea foot rolls ust received. The Finest assortment of choice stationery At H. G. Osteen and Co'e. bookJHre. The Dispensary Law Declared Unconstitutional Insofar as It Prohibits Importation. WASHINGTON*, Jan. 18 -The su preme court of the United States to day decided that the famous dis pensary law. of South Carolina, at least so far as it attempted to prevent a citizen of the State from importing into the commonwealth liquors for his own use. was in violation of the interstate commerce law of the Fed eral Constitution, and therefore null and void The opinion of the court was prepared by Mr. Justice Shiras, but in his absence owing to indispo? sition, its conclusions were an? nounced by Chief Justice Fuller. The cases at bar were begr?n in the Federal court for South Carolina by James Donald, a citizen ofthat State, upon the seizure of a case of Califor? nia claret, six bottles of Maryland whiskey and a barrel of Rochester, N Y., beer, by S. M. Gardner. M. T. Holly, Sr., E. C Beach and J. M Scott, State constables, acting under the provisions of the dispensary law directing the seizure of all the liquors in the hands of any common carrier, agent or private citizen, not sold by the State agent, whether im? ported or otherwise The trial .court gave Donald judgment for $300 in each case and the constables appeal? ed The cases were argued last fall, the validity of the entire law being brought into question The opinion of the court stated that the proceed? ings were not a suit against the state,"which could not be brought without its consent, and that the pleadings of the record raised ques? tions which gave the supreme court of the United States jurisdiction of the whole subject The law was discussed at great length on the opinion and many authorities cited, the result being that the judgment of the court below in favor of the own? er of the liquors was affirmed with costs, for the reason that the law was in contravention of the clause of the uational Constitution regulating com? merce between the States The opinion conceded that the legislature of the State passed the law in what it believed to be the exercise of its police power aud with no intention lo interfere with the operation of any Federal law or to discriminate against the products of any other State, but that intention, it contiued, couT8 not tiua?ly control the determi? nation of the effect of the law.. ' Mr. Justice Brewer did not hear the argument and took no part in the decision. Mr Justice Brown recorded a rigorous dissent, saying : "The ef? fect of the enactment of the Wiison law seems to me to withdraw intoxi? cating liquors from the operation of the commerce clause of the Consti? tution and to permit the traffic in them to be regulated in such a man? ner as the several States, in the exercise of their police powers, shall deem best for the general interests of the public This act is not limited in its operation, as the majority opin? ion seems to assume, to State laws forbidding the importation, manufac? ture and sale of such liquors, but de? clares that they shall be subject upon their arrival within the State to the operation of all its laws enacted in the exercise of its police powers "Now, as congress has expressly I declared that such articles shall, upon their arrival in the State, become Bubject to its laws to the same extent as if they had been originally pro? duced there, and as *the dispensary law daos not declare them contra? band as imported liquors or because they were not bought from a State officer authorized to sell the same, and as the law makes no discrimina? tion in that particular between im? ported and domestic liquor, it is im? possible for me to see why congress has'not directly, authorized the action that was taken by the State officers in seizing these liquors. -Butas I understand, the court bases, to a certain extent, its opinion of the constitutionality of this act | upon the fact that the traffic in in? toxicating liquors is not absolutely prohibited, but is monopolized by the State itself through the agency of a State commission. "Granting that the act gives the State itself a monopoly of all the traffic in such liquors, it is not a monopoly in the ordinary or obvious sense of the term, where one individ? ual or corporation is given the right to a manufacture or trade which is not open to others, but a monopoly i for the benefit of the whole people of the State, the profits of which, if any, are enjoyed by the whole peo- i pie ; in short, a monopoly in the same sense in which the postoffice depart? ment and the right to carry the mails; j : is a monopoly of the federal govern- : ment " Quoting Chief Justices Marshall i and Waite upon the necessity of the i expediency of the courts acting with i great delicacy and hesitation in de? claring a statine unconstitutional, < Justice Brown concluded : "1 re- ] gard these words as particularly ap- i p?cable to the dealings by this court. I with the proceedings of a State legis- I latino and that their right to deter- < i mino what is for tho best interests of i their people should be carefully re- < spected, except where it comes in j manifest conflict with the dominant ] law. Especially should everything i oe avoided which carries the sug- j gestion of a vexatious interference with State action. The manifest dangers to the future of the country, which lark in the inflexibility of the Federal Constitution can only be averted by carefully distinguishing between such laws as practically con? cern the inhabitants of a particular State only and are intended bona fide for their welfare and such as are a mere subterfuge for an unlawful dis- | crimination and cannot be carried into effect without doing palpable injustice to citizens of others Slate. It should not be overlooked in this connection that the complaints in this case emanate from a citizen of South Carolina, who seeks to defy the law of his own State and puts forward as his excuse the injustice done the citizens of other States, who make no complaint of her action in this particular. If a State cannot prohibit her own citizens from importing liquors, as well as buying them at booie, the 'VYilson bill' is set at naught and the prohibitory laws of the several States rendered inopera? tive in a vital particular. The fact that these liquors were imported for complainant's own use and consump? tion, instead of for sale, raises no question under the Federal Constitu? tion. Both are under the ban of the statute. "I am unable to see how that sec? tion of the dispensary act of South Carolina, which authorized the sez urs made in this case, conflicts in any particular with the Federal Con? stitution." Ravages of Plague and Famine. LONDON, Jan. 16.-The eyes ol ?he Euro-^an world are turned this week toward India, each day's intelligence from that stricken land making it more apparent that the greatest tragedy in modern history is being enacted there under the double curse of famine and plague. The heart of Europe has been touched at last and the universal sympathy is perhaps more keen because it is now tinged with apprehension. It would not be surprising if within a month a genuine plague panic should spread through christendom. The great powers she*w alarm and the news comes to-day that Italy has summon? ed an international conference to meet forthwith at Rome to consider measures for dealing with the dan? ger. There is little doubt that the response of the other governments will be favorable and ali the resources of modern science will be speedily arrayed against the hideous foe. Reliable information about the ex? tent of the plague in Bombay and vicinity is lacking, and regarding the mortality, it is only said in general terms that more than half of those attacked succumb. The news ser? vice of the London press is strangely inadequate, and it is from private sources that most of the information comes. The point which most inter? ests Europeans is whether the awful disease is likely to flourish in north? ern latitudes if infection should be introduced here, but no evidence is forthcoming yet. lt is argued by medical men, however, that if the plague was dangerous in Hong Kong, it will find an equally prolific field in London and Paris so far as the climate is concerned It is gen? erally admitted that the plague is a filth disease, but there are certain pe? culiarities connected with its spread Dr. Hankin, a well known bacteriolo? gist, who is investigating in Bombay, fastens the responsibility for carrying the infection upon rats, ants and other insects. Rats in bouses have the plague ; they die and are eaten by ants which carry the germs into the crevices of the buildiugs, to water taps and sinks. Thus the poison is diffused and cannot be eradicated except by fire. This ex? plains the efficacy of the old methods of cleansing by conflagration, and at the same time the futility of isolating the sick as in other infectious dis? eases The only thing to do is to re? move the healthy It is stated in the Daily Mail's dis? patches, which are the only ones worth reading in the London papers, that large busines houses in Bombay which are iniected by rats have been rendered untenable by the ravages of the plague among the vermin They died by the hundreds in the walls and the human occupants have beeu compelled to vacate the buildings. It is observed that any larger animals tire subject to the infection. The French, Austrian and Italian governments have already taken stringent precutious against the im? portation of the plague, but it can hardly be possible to escape a series of alarms from this cause during the next few weeks The ravages of the famine in the interior of India are still still far more deadly than the horrible plaugue at Bombay. The victims of the plague are perishing by hundreds daily, but the victims of hunger succumb by thousands daily. It would be easy to harrow the hearts jf every one possessing human sym? pathy by accounts of the typical sights experienced in the vast Famine district, but surely appetite for horror in all its forms has been satiated throughout christendom dur? ing the past few months. It is suffi? cient to say that the gaunt, starving millions of India are perishing at a nore rapid rate than an army ever suffered before the most deadly en? gines of destruction devised by man. The relie? movement is now appa? rently in ful! operation The public conscience and s}*mpathy in this country have both been fully aroused. The response to the appeal is liberal and utterly inadequate. The propor? tion of givers to the sufferers is scarcely more than one in a thousand. It will require the generosity of the whole world to oppose a real check to the ravages of hunger in India. Cured by Dr. Miles" Nervine. .? Prolonged derangement of the nervous system not only affects the brain and men? tal powers, but develops disease in some o? the vital organs. The most dangerous of these indirect results is when the heart is affected. This was the case of the Rev. N. F. Surface, Fawn River, Mich., who writes under date of Feb. 14,1S95: "Fourteen years ago I had a slight stroke of paralysis. Overwork brought on nervous prostration. I was exceedingly nervous and the exertion of public speaking caused heart palpitation that threatened my life. I used two bottles of Dr^Miles' New Heart Cure for my heart trouble, and two of Dr. Miles' Restorative Nervine for my nervous? ness and feel better than I ever expected to feel again? I can speak for hours without tiring or having ray heart flutter as it for? merly did, and I have you to thank that I ai? alive today." On sale by all druggists. Dr. Miles' Book on Heart and Nervous Disorders FREE by mail. Dr. Miles Medical Co., Elkhart, Ind. Dr. Miles' Remedies Restore Health Order Your PROVISIONS AND GROCERIES FROM GEO. f. STEFFENS & SON, Wholesale Agents, Charleston, S C -Agents for MOTT'S'CIDEB RED SEAL CIOABS, AND DOVE HAMS ? ? STANTON HOUSE. Di J. JONES, Poprietor. Rates $2.00 Per Day. SPECIAL TEEMS TO FAMILIES. Two Minutes Walk From Central Depot. Chattanooga. Tenn. July 29. ORDER FRUIT -FROM TEE SOUTHERN FRUIT GO. CHARLESTON. S. C. And get best value for the money. Orders carefully and prompt? ly filled. W. H. MIXSON, Manager. Sept, 30. TRADE MARKS, "v . 'l^ DESIGNS, COPYRIGHTS &C. ' . ? r r p?:*"rt?*h and description may ?u - . . .. r'rec, whether an invention is ' i '.. ConsmunSstions strictly . r Sf?er.ey f<cs< i ;:r::i : patents - < .-. hnve Washington ellice. i -jil; ll:::.:: ?. Co. receive 1 i i.: -tr-:'' cd, Inrsres? circulation cf . .-. . ' . : ,u:^ai.v/eek?y,terms$3.C0a_year; SiX ' >' Specimen copiesandllAiTD Loos, cs i'Ar..Nrs sent free. Address MUNN & CO., 3?il Broadway, New York. Honey io Lend ON IMPROVED Farming Lands at 7:pe: cent. interest per annum Apoly to LEE & MOISE, Attorneys. Nov. ll-3m. Sumter, S. C.