The watchman and southron. (Sumter, S.C.) 1881-1930, October 14, 1896, Image 4
WEDNESDAY," OCT. 14, 1886.
The Sumter Watchman was founded
ia 1S?0 and the True Southron ia 1856.
The Watchman and Southron aow has
the combined circulation and influence
of both of the old papers, and is mani?
festly the best advertising medium in
Sumter
COUNTY NAMES.
It is primarily a local question, per?
haps, bot as every part of the State is
naturally and properly interested in
na a es that apply to large districts of
the State's territory, it ts to be hoped
that the good people who are a o vi og
for the formation of new counties will
be very particular about the .choice" of..
Dames for them, if the movements
prove successful. _, _ . .....
We do not know who suggested it,
or why it was selected, but we do not
think that "Salem," for instance, is
the most appropriate pr, the best name
to be given to the county proposed to
be made of parts of Sumter, Kershaw
and Darli ag ton. The name is a very
common CBS io the United States, be?
ing applied to scores, perhaps hundreds,
of country churches, and to a county in
New Jersey, it is a Hebrew word
meaoiog 'peace,*' and it is therefore
very suitable for the designation of
buildings devoted to religious purposes.
Is is not elear that it would be particu?
larly suitable for the name of any
county in South Carolina. The name,
it may also be troted, is already ap?
plied to a county in New Jeraey, and
to the town ia Massachusetts which is
notorious f*r hading burned helpless
old women af fb.9 stake for "witches"
io the early history cf the country.
A better came could very readily be
found for the new county by following
the plan pursued in naming the several
counties from which it will be formed
and giving it the naree of some man
distinguished io the history of the Stare
or the country.
There is a number of such names
available for the purpose, including
those of Morgan, Moultrie, Pinokney,
If Calhoun, Davis, Lee, and Jackson,
and if other than a personal name were
preferred it^aFw^ys in order and ic
excellent taste to employ a local lodi a
oame. ^
"~ fhe same suggestions apply) of
eeurse, to the ease of each coe of the
several proposed ,09w counties. We
take for granted that the people of
.Berkeley au i Coller?n, if they make a
' new county, will honor the great old
patriot and warrior Moultrie by calling
it by bis came, and that the county,
with. Greenwood for its seat will be
nansed Calhoun We hope our friend?
of Kershaw and Darlington and Sumter
will make as good a selection when the
time comes for chem to act in the mat?
ter, and we are sure that there is not
sacb poverty <>f local pride and senti*
ment and history in that fair region as
to permit the selection of the tame and
mi&t title of "Salem."-Nows and
Courier
The selection of the oame cf Salem
fer the new county to be made from
portions cf Sumter, I>*rUo2ton and
Kerskaw Counties can be very r.'sdiiy
accounted for. That seciion oi Salter
County that will be cut off f?u the :-ro
posed new county has been kn?*? as
Upper Salem fer at least seventy-ive
' \or one hundred years, perhaps longer
The oldest maps and records to which
we have access show that section to have
beac known as Salem in the early part
cf the century. Salem it has been all
these years to tbe people whose hemes j
He within the territory and to thocc
who resided io other sections of the
county, and now that they propose es?
tablishing a county of their own ii is
but natural that they should wish to
preserve the old aod familiar name.
Oo cid maps Sumter Hist ri ci is di?
vided iato four sections, Claremont,
Clarendon, Upper Salem and Lower
Salem. Clarendon was cut off and
with a portion of Lower Salem made a
separate district prior to the war.
Sumter Couotv at present comprises
the Urger portion of the section known
as Lower Salem aod ali of Claremont
and Upper Salem. The new county
wiri take io a portion of Lower Salem
and all of Upper Salem. j
We approve of honoring the memo- j
ries of the State's distinguished men
and would gladly see the proposed new
county, towards the creation of which
Sumter wHl contribute so largely in
territory and wealth, bear the name of
a distinguished and worthy Carolinian
bat if the people of that section prefer
to perpetuate the name of Salem it is
their concern and not ours.
FOR PALMER AND BUCKNER.
The Palmer and Buckner electoral
ticket for South Carolina has been
completed with the exception of the
candidate for elector from the Third
District, who has not yet been se?
lected. The ticket as it stands is as
follows :
At Large-F. W McMaster, of!
Columbia ; Geo W. Dargan, of Dar
ligton.
First District-Frank Q. O'Neill,
of Charleston.
Second District-George B. Lake,
of Edgefieid.
Fourth District-Frank Evans of
Spartanburg.
Fifth District-A. C Springs, of
York?;
Sixth District-A. T. Harllee, of
Marion.
Seventh District-James D. Bland?
i*Dg, of Sumter.
The gentlemen who have consent
ed to become, candidates fur positions
that they know full well there is not
the remotest possibility of obtaining
are all good men and have been good
democrats. It is on this account that
we regret to see them make so seri
oas a mistake. We do not condemn
a man for leading a forlorn hope for
the sake of principle, and, therefore,
we cannot condemn these gentlemen,
but we must confess that it is impes
sible for us to conceive how any
democrat, especially a Southern dem?
ocrat, can consent to use his influ?
ence and cast his vote in a cause that
will contribute toward the election of
a republican President and Congress.
------
Comptroller General Norton is right.
A thorough investigation should be
made into the shortage in the accounts
of Ex-Tre3surer Keels. If A conspir?
acy existed by which the Treasurer and
Auditor embezzled the county funds no
stone should be left unturned to bring
it to light, and, when the facts are
knowu, no effort abould t>e spared to i
punish the guilty parties as they de?
serve. If the shortage ts doe io - are
lessoess a*id incompetency on the part
of the Auditor of v*bictV> thc Treacurer
took advantage to defraud tbeoDonty,
both should be punished, for both are
goth*:
If the shprtage is apparent only, and
?ujaj?~4i?--f?stab}ir.?;??i that b&? "book?
keeping and not criminality is to be
charged against Capt. Keels, then
want to knoiv tba facts But wo sub
mil tba' Comptroller General Norlin
should not calmly ignore the r?port of
Mr. A. W. Suder who has spent
months in investigating (hts matter
Mr. Soder was employed by the Gr*id !
Jury to perform this work and be per?
formed his duty carefully aod wi;b in- ,
Seite pains aod labor. Mr. Suder is a
competent man, has had ezpenence in
such work and having maoe bis repu: t
to the Grand Jury, it now devolves
upon Capt. Keels, the Auditor's Office
aod the Comptroller G?nerai'*? office to
prove that bi? report is cot. trustworthy
and accurate Comptroller General
Norton bas been making the aocual
?ettlemects wirh -bis county for fiw or
six years past, if we mistake not, as
chief clerk for Comptroller General
E'lerbe a-nd for himself, a::d as the
greater sbo toge occurred doting the
incumbency of Mr. Klierbs, when Mr
Norton had direct, supervision ?f the an
nual settlements, it is strange ?hat be
did not discover some tracen of the care?
less and slip shod methods tbat ob
tamed tn both the Treasurer's and
Auditor's ( fices of Sumter county. The
slip shod administration of both offices
duriog the period between 1890 and
1894 was a matter of comm JU report
at the time aod nobody was surprised
at the receut exposure
National back circulation outland
ingon September 30 amounted to $233.
552,OS0 This represents an increase
of $4,022,081 for the moots, and of
?20.789,793 for the year ending there?
with. The portion of the circulation
based OD the deposit of bonds amounted
to $214,667 694, wl?ica represents an
increase of $4 374.120 for the mouth,
and of $26,070.817 for the year et d
iDg '. herewith The portion of me cir?
culation based OB the deposit of tunney
amouoted to $18,884,236, which is a
decrease of $348,530 for the month,
and of $5,281,024 for the year ending
therewith. As will be seen, the c.rca
lation secured by bonds is increasing,
while that secured by despesits of
money is on the decline.
A travelling correspondent of the
New York World figures out a majority
of 10,000 for McKinley in Washington
county, Md., whereupon the Wasbirig
tonPo8t wants to know by what pro?
cess he figures out a majority cflO,
000 for anybody io a county .which
casts only 9,379 votes. When it comes
to figuring, it is hard to beat the Mc
Kinley election prognstioator.
Ever since the Grand Jun ?t the March
Term of Court appointed ?: special committee
to examine into I he condition of the County
offices, especial reference being hud to that of
the Treasurer, sen ss tiona1, devi lotrnjents have
been looked forward to hy those who were
acquainted with the well founded rumors
that furnished the grounds for the action of
the ?Grand Jury. The : presentment ?made
yesterday afternoon made? a decided reve?
lation and created a sensation, for Ex-Treas?
urer Keels was shown to be a dc-fau!ter to a
larger amount than was suppcepd.
The report of the expert employed by the
Grnnd Jury to make the examination is very
full and exhaustive and shows where and
how Capt. Keel* made awny with the fui.da
of the county. The presentment and reports
submitted were as follows :
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
SUMTBK CODSTY.
To Your Honor W. C. Benet, Presiding
Judge.
We, the Grand Jory of Sumter County, S.
C , respectfully make the following as our
presentment for October, 1896, term of
Court :
1st. We have parsed on all bills banded us
by Solidror.
2d. We have made a careful examination
of the bonds of all connty officials, by tak?
ing tax returns of iMcb individual bondsman
and deducting Therefrom homestead exemp?
tion and mortgages and find them sufficient?
ly strong.
3d We have inspected Poor House and
Jail, report them tn good condition and in?
mates properly cared for.
4th. The condition of tbe Court Houte
and offices, while not in first class order will
answer, AS a complete overhauling of present
building is now under consideration by the
county officials.
5tb. We call attention of Supervisor to
dam on Loring's .Mill road beirg too narrow
and co railing on bridge across the race
6th. Our former recommendations baye
either been acted upon or satisfactorily ex?
plained. ./
7th. The books of the Magistrates ??ave
been examined and we Sad those of J. L.
Parrott, J B R*ffie!d, W. A. Nettles, H. L
B. Weirs, L Jennings properly kept, all
moneys accounted for Those of B. P. Kel?
ley, Daniel Keels, E J. Goodman incomplete,
no record of fines being entered
8 b. Investigation of the book3 of Ex
Treasurer D E Keels show a shortage of
$7,164 95, which ie shown in detail by re?
port of expert A. W*. Suder, herewith at?
tached
9 h. Books of M's ter, Auditor, Supervisor, ?
Judge of Probate ai;d School Oeraojii>siouer |
in good shape.
It having been brought to our atrention
that W H Commander, while acting as
Sheriff has collected funds which ha- hus not
tun.ee over, we recoicmen i that bc be re
quired.to make inmediate settlement
We recommend that the incoming officials !
give bond in some good sure?j company. '
Th? duties devolving on A. W. Suder in
the ix-!*r.inntion of thv t.-o-.'ks of county offi?
cials have teen very laborious <?od compli?
cated and we therefore recommend that he be ^
paid the sum of $300, ?ess amotiut airead*
paid. j
We beg to express our appreciation of, and
thanks to your huuor and to all the court 1
officials for courtesies shown us.
Respectfallv submitted,
H. G. SHAW, Foreman.
Sumter, Oct. 7, 1896.
SPECIAL PRESENTMENT.
To Your Honor, W. C. Banet, Presiding '
J>IJ(il??-* . - - - - !
We ?ipreby tireser?! the Spring Hill Distil- '
len ?.s -t-Uir.g and dis using of spiri:tunis !
! q'jora unlawfully, and th** Jumes E
Heriot,. W i ?lie Jenkins, S>?ff.;r.1 Citboage* '
i'ock, W. P Weldon, J Ed Smokey, C. L |
Wt!li*.msoo, W J. Mcitato, E B Colclough, |
W. E Dick, Thomas Bflvin, vviiiieE An?
derson, Nat Barnett, D A Outlaw are ma (
teriril witnesses to orove the same
H. G. SHAW, Foreman.
Sumter. Oct 7, 1893 ,
Said distillery ii kept by Thomas C. '
Short-*. H. G. SHAW.. i
SPECIAL PRESENTMENT.
To your Honor, W C. Benet, Presiding
Judge :
We hereby attach 'irie following affidavit
and ask that you etil Solicitor s attention <
to i: H G. SHA W', Foreman.
Sumier, Oct. 7, 1S96.
SOUTH CAROLINA, >
Sumter Coun y, /
Perso a:.'liv appeared before rn?, H. L. B
Welt?, a Magist ute in and for said co?nty ?
aod State, R L Durant who being duly <
sworn sa;5 tLal at Suinter, in said county .
?nd S?aie, on the 3i day of October, A. D. | j
1895, on puolic nigh wa j of Sum'.er County j
cue H F. A?cCut. ben did ?top his carrure m
the pui'lic highway in charge of depo?
nent's coachman, Joshua Mack, aud did
pull out his pisto! in shooting dis?
tance and d'd pfeiot ii at the s::id j '
Joshua Mack and did tnreatee thereupon to
shoot and kill the said Muck, greatly fi igt:;- 1
eciog and putting in fear his wiie, aid ?bat I
his wife, Mrs. Mary Jane Durant, -?nd Joshua j
Mack are m-iterial witnesses to prove the j
saint*
R L Durant
Sworn and subscribed to before roe this 7th
Ocioner, A .D., 1896.
H. L. B. WELLS,
Mngi-iiraie. i*>-S.}
Tt> Messrs. A. Wbtte, E. H. Moses and
William Yeadon, Committee Grand
Jury^Sumter County.
October Term, 1S96.
Gentlemen :
On the 20th day of April last, and
from previous understanding, I re?
ceived your notice of appointment as
an expert to examine the county
offices, and to report to the Grand
Jury at the June term of court.
In accordance with instrictions con- i
tained in your noficeof appointment,
I at once entered upon Wie discbarge
of the duties so "imposed, and I first
commenced the investigation of the
Treasurer's office, covering the period
of (4) four years,commencing with the
fiscal year ?S89, and closing with the i
fiscal year 1893, this period embraced
the encumbency of Ex-Treasurer I). E.
Keels. Upon lining out the plan o?
investigation, I at once discovered an
apparent discrepancy in the closing
settlement sheets of the Ex-Treasurer
covering the collection and abatements
of ?.he Toll Taxes, and I pursued it as
rapidly as it was consistent with the
condition of this branch of his ac?
counts and found it was impossible to
make an intelligent amd comprehen- j
sive report to the "June Term of i
Court" and 1 personally appeared j
before the Jury at that term and stat- j
ed the condition of the investigation,
and then further instructed by your
Hon. Jury, through yourselves, a? re?
presenting the Jury, to proceed .
through the entire terni of four years, i
that the end may be reached, and was j
so instructed under date June 9th and
that the Jury would fully sustain me
in the full discharge of ray duties.
POLL TAX INVESTIGATION.
Under such instructions, I at once |
addressed an official letter to eve
Trial Justice (nov/ magistrate) in t
county, to report every Poll Tax \\?
rant now remaining- in their hand?,
having been received from Ex-Tres
urer, D. E. Keels, for collection, wit
out further delay, giving the status
each warrant upon its face, and to fu
ther report all monies collected, on a
count of said warrant, and to who
said monies were paid.
Upon the returns being: handed
from time to time I carefully exami
ed each warrant, and classified tl
same, after which I tabulated ea(
return showing in detail the conditic
of every warrant. Upon each retui
beicompleted, I notified each Tri
Justice to come up and examine tl
same, and sign the affidavit which
drew up and attached to each retur
After I had completed all the return
I then made a condensed statement <
the same, showing in detail the cond
tion of all the warrants, the amount <
money reported collected on aocout
of said warrants, and the amount pai
to Ex-Treasurer, D. E. Keels, and tr
amount paid to the present Treasure
H. h. Scarborough, which the report
will fully and plainly explain as pe
condensed statement marked Exhib
A, and which is fully supported by th
returns of each Trial Justice unde
oath before the Clerk of the Court an
which is attached to each return, an
which will show the balance found t
be due the school fund from thi
source of $1,568.90.
DISPENSARY ACCOUNT.
After completing this branch of th
investigation, I then turned my atten
tion to the Dispensary account, an?
carefully examined the same froin th
date of first payment made by the dis
pensary, up to and inclusive of the las
collection made by Ex-Treasurer E
E. Keels, and found that the amoun
of $173.65. and the amount of $75.43
making a total of $249.08, was due th?
county from this source, which wil
more fully appear by reference to tin
balance sheet herewith annexed aii(
marked Exhibit B.
COURT EXPENSES.
I then proceeded to the examinatior
of the court expenses, and found errol
of over credit in March and June
terms, 1895, of $100.10. This amount
will be found charged to him or
balance sheet above referred to anc
marked Exhibit B.
PUBLIC SCHOOL FUND.
Continuing my investigation I found
Ehe sum of $1,201,02 due, balance ol
cash of school fund, $1,200.00 of which
has since been paid and the receipt of
preient Treasurer, H. L. Scarborough,
ls herewith tiled covering that amount,
ind which I have credited him with
on balance sheet marked Exhibit B.
COUNTY TAX FUND.
1 also found the amount of $452.13,
balance of 'cash from the collection of
taxes due the county, which will be
found charged to bim on balance sheet
marKed Exhibit B, all of these amounts
shows a final balance against him from
Che sources mentioned of $2,431.23,
which lie has to account for.
REAL ESTATE AND PERSONAL PROPERTY.
? then proceeded to the investigation
of the general real estate and personal
property taxes, including such poll
taxes as was put in execution: through
the Sheriff office, and was joined in
this branch of the investigation by the
State in the person of Mr. X. W.
Brooker with whom I co-operated.
This part of the investigation necessi?
tated a transcript of all ' Nulla Bona"
taxes taken from "Sheriff' Carson's"
Book dating back to the fiscal year
commencing Nov. lstr1888, to the fiscal
year embraced in Sheriff Sanders
Book, 1893, and who succeded Sheriff
Carson, concerning every item of
'Nulla Bona" taxes during Mr. Keels'
term of office. This evidence together
with the amouats of credits on Mr.
Keels annual settlement sheets was
taken by Mr. N. W. Brooker in a con?
densed statement ,and incorporated in
his report to the Secretary #of State,
md a copy of his report is riled here?
with showing balance due by Mr.
Keels from this source of $4,733.72,
which he has to acount for.
TOTAL DEFICIENCY.
Placing the amount due by Ex
Treasurer Keels from Exhibit B and
the amounts due amounting to $2,431.
2o, by the report to Secretary of State
of Mr. N. W. Brooker of $4,733.72 shows
the aggregate amount of Ex-Treasurer
Keel, deficiency to be $7,164.95.
Tne whole course of the investiga?
tion lead me through the entire
accounts of the Sheriff's office, for the
term of four years, and also the office
of the County Auditor?
SHERIFF AND AUDITOR'S OFFICE.
I found the "Sheriff Office Book"
oorreetly kept, and those of the
County Auditor neatly and correctly
kept, all the tax duplicates and other
records of the office were in proper
keeping, and the officers were courte?
ous and assisted me in every way, in
the discharge of my onerous dutie*.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE.
The County Commissioners office is
correctly kept, all the accounts and
business of the office is done in a
methodical manner, and information
upon any matter connected, with Ohe
county, can be readily obtained, and
from a close investigation as to the
actions of the present board, I rind a
conservative spirit seems to manifest
itself in the administration of the
affairs of the county, and the present
Secretary of the Board, Col. T. V.
Walsh, is tobe commended for his dili?
gence and care is the management of
the derails of the office.
EXPLANATION POLL TAX.
INVESTIGATION.
By reference to Exhibit A. which
covers exclusively the Poll Tax inves?
tigation you will lind the No. Polls re?
turned N. E. T. to be 2731, over 50 per
cent, of the amount issued: the No.
Poll returned paid to "be, 491, the No.
Polls returned not executed to be 1,110,
the no. Polls parties claim to have paid
by the production of their receipts to
be 383, and the number worked the
roads to be 2S, and, all so arranged and
labelled for each section of the Coun?
ty, that they can be easily disposed of,
by the present Treasurer. You will
note the amount funds collected for ?
the amount Tolls reported paul, to be j
$572.20, the amount due by D. E. Keels ;
for his portion of the collections as re- j
ported by several Trial Justices to be !
$246.35, subject to a credit of $U>2.05,
for his cost paid to the present Treas?
urer, H. L. Scarborough, which will
more fully appear by reference to tile
Exhibit marked A. The amount paid
to preient Treasurer has been reported
to me. A statement of the same is
filed with this report.
You will note the number poll
turned N.E. I. to be over 50;
amount issued, and all these ri
can now be taken oft" tne "Tax ile
which will releive the cilice and
istrates from further annoyance,
polls returned not executed can
be turned over to present Treas
for collection, and the polls ina
paid, can also be so marked upon
Treasurer's lax duplicate, which
fully clear up all this poll tax busi
which has benn such a source of l
ble and annoyance, for rhe past
years. All the warrants, Treasu
annual settlement sheets, reports
other papers in the case, I now
over to the Grand Jury for their f u
disposition.
I will here state that all the pi
made in this case, I took from
official records of the different oil
and also from Mr. Keels annual se
ment sheets with the Comptroller (
eral, which I herewith file as pan
the records in this case, and whic
positive evidence, covering the er
investigation over a period of i
years from Nov. 1st, 1S89, to Nov.
1S93, which embraces Mr. Keels en
two terms of office.
TREASURER H. L. SCARBOROUGH.
I went through the accounts of
present Treasurer, Mr. H. L. S
borough, and I am pleased to state 1
they have all been methodically
ranged, and with the new books 1
in ose by the State, all of the det
of Tax Collections, are carefully j
vided for, and I can see no reason v
with anything like ordinary care
the future management of the ofl
that il; cannot but be satisfactory
the people.
MASTER'S OFFICE.
I carefully examined the records
this office and found all these cases c
fully and intelligently disposed of t
proper entries made with a full s
correct statement as to the disposit
of all furrds by the present Masl
Mq, W. H. Ingram, who should
commended for the method and pa
taking care exhibited in the mana;
ment of the office. Of the funds
his hands, I find all well invested t
on sufficient security, with the po?
ble exception of $3,000 of the funds
the Trust Estate of Mrs. Emma
Moses, the security in this case, r
being in my opinion sufficient. Tl
investment was made by Mr. in gm
predecessor in office, and Mr. Ingn
is not in anyway to blame. It wot
be well that the Master should be i
quired to either call in this fund a
reinvest it or require the securi
strengthened.
POLL TAXES FOR WHICH PARTIES SH(
RECEIPTS.
I have carefully examined each pi
tax warrant where party claim to ha
paid by the production of their r
ceipts, and have accounted for them,
appeared from the examination of t
Treasurer's tax Duplicate that in r
most every instance I found that tl
poll tax paid in one township at
assessed in another, this occurri
from the Auditor carrying forwai
from year to year a name, whi
the party would move into ai
other Township, and assessed the
and in many cases they would be n
ported by others and put upiui add
tiona! arrd extra and'assessment. ?
several cases I could find no stubb n
ceipt in stubb book covering the nun
ber for that year, and in such cast
the natural presumption is that the
produced a receipt which covered tl:
payment of a tax for the previous c
succeeding year in every case. I hav
made the proper endorsement upo
the warrant in order that the Auditc
may properly dispose of each,case.
CONCLUSION.
It is clearly apparent to my min
had not the "Grand-Jury" pursued thi
investigation in the manner they hav
that the findings of the Jury, as no\
presented, would never have bo?
made, and the loss of the amounts no\
found to be due the citizens of th
County would never have been dis
covered.
In my judgment these investiga
tions should be annual, which wouh
have a tendency to cause the officer
of the County, to be more careful an(
diligent in the discharge of their re
spective duties, and would in a larg?
measure prevent a repetition of tin
conditions as shown by this report.
I have been actively engaged in this
investigation from the date of ir?}
appointment, and have pursued it witt
great care, not desiring to present anj
matter to the Jury without being fullj
sustained by positive evidence, as -tc
do otherwise would only^tend to tfie
injury #f my fellow nan, without just
cause, and this I would not do.
I trust that my efforts have proven
satisfactory and sustained my state?
ments made to the Jury at its last
meeting, and as to my fee, I will leave
to the liberality of the Jury, the only
question is what has it been worth to
the County? And 1 feel satisfied that
the Jury will be just in lixing the
amount.
. A. W. SUDER.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
EXECCTIVS DEPARTMENT.
OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LANDS.
COLUMBIA, S. C , Sept. 28, 1896
Mr. A. W. Surfer, Slimier, S C.
Dear Sir : As agent for The Secretary of
State, who is ex-efheio agent of ibe Sinking
Fund Coiuinii?tonen?, by authority ?>f the act
of 1892, entitled "An Act to provide an ad?
ditional remedr for the collection of tase?,
costs and penalties upon lands ^nst due and
unpaid for eight nioritbs," I oegnn investiga
grttion of the nulla bona retaros of the Sheriff
of Sumter County upon executions placed in
his hands by the coumy treasurers. This
was commenced nearly a ye*r ago, but, on
accouHt of other duties elsewhere tnking my
time and which still occupy my time, it bas
not yet bren completed. It is our design to
pursue ibis work until it shall be finished,
with the view of collecting the lost coney to
the State, as required by the sr.?d statute.
We are not prepared to make a full report for
reasons stated, aod have as yet made no
general report. B;it one matter which comes
cauaily under my observation, while it is not
in the scope of my special work, yet it be?
came my duty asan officer of the State to
briog to the attention of my superior, the
Secretary of State. The magnitude cf ?he
hem demands immediate attention and I nm
therefore instructed by the Secretary to call
the attention of '.ht Grand Jury of the coan.- ]
ty to th? runtier for such consideration as ?
tiiey may be dispesed to give it, he having :
no powers under the law to pursue it further. :
Hence, I write j ou as the Grand Jury expert, !
this letter with t!:e rudest that you present
tbe case to their;. The item is ns follows: j
In the seulement ruade between thc- auditor
and treasurer for the fiscal year 1890 91, it
will bc seen by the settlement sheet of i hat year ;
that the ex-treasurer, D. E. Keel?, took credit i
for the large sum of $3,514 30^ nulla bona j
reiurr.3 The magnitude of ??;is i tera jittract
i? raj H?ierjr:cn r.a'i prompted ar: inves'isa?
; iori of tb - f?st*!9 bv rue, v. hieb revealed that
dunns r.T for th'*! ?,c^> ?ear. 1890, the said
rx-tressnrer issued o:Jy$3,?00 tn executions.
Of this amount it ?ppears that ?he shc-rif had
collected S7'J5 99. The sum of $692 is cred?
ited to the said ex-tre?su:er as executions in
the hands of the sheriff, thus accounting for
the two latter sums say $1,397.99 leavirg
the sum of $2,202.23, which approximately
appears to be the full amount to which the
3'iid fx-treisr.rer could he entitled to credit
as nuli.H bona re urns by the sheriff fer that
year, 1890 91 The above item of $8,514.30
being a credit for nulla returns for that year,
it therefore, appears to be too large to the ex?
tent of the sum of say $6.312.07. After a
searching investigation I have not been able
to find an explanation to this credit item.
I send with this report the buodle of ex?
tracts t?ken from the sheriff s hooks for sev?
eral }ears preceeding and succeeding the fis?
cal j ear 1890-91, as proofs that the said item
of credit could not come from the preceeding
years aod is therefore wroni:. The said ex?
tracts are marked exhibir? "A" & "B."
We beg to submit that the coat of this ic
Testigation amounts to the sum of, say, forty
dollars including expenses, and we ask that if
the Grand Jury make use ot this report, that
they reimburse the Secretary of State for the
same sum thus profitably expended for the
county of Sumter.
Ia the further investigation of the work by
us under the act of 1892 and 1896, if any
thing further of the above nature appears te^
us we will promptly report fhe same as in *
this case.
We enclose herewith copies of the acs cf
1892 above referred to and also an act of
1896 bearing upon the same subject.
Very respectfully jours,
N. W. BROC KEE,
Traveling Agent, Forfeited Lands For D. fi.
Tompkiu -, Secretary of State.
Card of Thanks
HAGODD, S. C , Oct 3 1896
Mr. Edior :-Please allow rae sp?ce tn
your columns to thank the friend? of Capt.
J D. Graham for their valuable assistance at
our entertainm-nt on the night cf the 1st
inst I can assure them that their services
and contributions were highly appreciated,
and in nehaif uf the Camp Nx'end to them
our heartfelt thanks.
JOHN J Ns/SON, Commencer.
Iff m. Fp'f-man nr.H Harald, nie? se ot pr
Tuit^ Pills
Cure All
Liver Ills.
Save Your Money.
One box of Tuft's Pills wiil save
many dollars in doctors' bills
They will siire?y cure all diseases
of the stomach, liver or bowels.
No Reckless Assertion
For sick headache, dyspepsia,
malaria, constipation and bilio?
usness, a million people endorse
TUTTS Liver PILLS
TASTELESS
rS JUST AS GOOD FOR ADULTS.
WARRANTED. PRICE 50 cts.
GALATIA, ILLS., NOV. 16,1893.
Paris aiedioine Co., St. Louis, Mo.
Gentlemen:-We sold last year, 600 bottles o?
GHOVE'S TASTELESS CHILL TONIC and have
bought three gross already this year. In all oar ex?
perience of H years, in the drug business, have
never sold an article that gave such universal satis?
faction as your Tonic. Yours truly,
ABNEY, CARR ?CO?
SOLD-No Cure, No Pav, hy A J. China
J F. W DeLorme, J. S. Rughson k Co.
BOY NONE BUT THE GENUINE.
8,000 Merchants sell Hawkes' Spectacles
successfully. Half of them bandle other
Spectacles without success,
Showing the Great Popularity of HAW?
KES' GLASSES over all others
These Famous Glasses are fhted to the eyje
Dr.A. J. China's Drug Store, Sumter. S. G
Dec 1 l-o._
CteMflit Mp 1.64 A. F. M.
THE REGULAR MONTHLY COMMU?
NICATION of Claremont Lo?ge, No.
64, A. F. M.. will be held on Thursday
Evening, 0?t. 15th, at 1\ p. m. Brethren
will take doe notice and govern themselves
accordingly.
By order, r . M. SPANN, W. M.
H. C. Mosss. Secretary. ju!29-lw
Chamberlain's Eye and Skin Ointment
Is unequalled for Eczema, Totter, Salt
Rhcurn, Scald Head, Sore Nipples. Chapped
liand.-s licking Piles, Burns, Frost Bites,
Chronic Sere Eyes and Granulated Eye Lkfe
F^r sale by*lruggists ai 25 cents per bo~.
TO HORS?ToWNERS.
For putting a horse in a fine healthy con?
dition try l)r. CaU;'*s Condition Powders.
They tone up the system, aid digestion, cure
loss cf appetite, relieve constipation, correct
kidney disorder and destroy worms, giving
nev; life to an old or over-worked horse. 25
cents per package. For sale by druggists.
For sale in Sumter, by Dr. A. J. China.