The Darlington news. (Darlington, S.C.) 1875-1909, March 29, 1894, Image 2

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

&hf Darlington Uro. Pdblishkd Evkrt Thursday Hornino. ^iSNRT J, JHOMPAOR, PROPRIETOR. TERMS—$1 Per Annum in Advance; 90 cents for 8 mouths; 29 cents for 3 months. Advertising Rates: One Square first insertion $1.00 One Square second insertion 90 Rvery subsequent insertion 90 Contract advertisements inserted upon the most reasonable terms. GIVEN HIS LIBERTY. (Continued from Page 1.) guilty, that Scott fired the fatal shot; in other words, they be lieve that Scott told the truth when he said that Janies hired him for the purpose of having him kill his father, but that he lied when he said it was Wil liams who fired the gun, a con clusion which, it is said, was unanimously arrived at by both of the petit juries that convict ed James. If he was false in this one vital particular, is it going too far to assume that he may have been false in all? “It is desired to call the at tention of the executive to the first of t h e above-mentioned reasons, in particular, namely the different stories which Scott has told about this tragedy. The fact that he told Mr. Ward, his attorney, a totally different version of the affair from which he gave on the witness stand, has never been disputed, but owing to the peculiar legal technicalities in the way, the defendant, James, could never make use of this fact in his be half. the circuit judge having held that the statements made by Scott to Ward were privilegl ed communications between atl torney and client, and were] therefore inviolable. While bowing with defference to the opinion of the court, we cannoll refrain from calling his excel! lency’s attention to the fact] that in all of the States where) this particular question has been raised, South Carolina is the first to decide it in this man ner, and that this conclusion was reached by our court with out the authority of a single other court throughout the length and breadth of the counl try to support it. On the con] trary, in the States of Michi-I § an, Massachusetts. Mississippi, brth Carolina and New York, it has been held that the privi lege is one created solely for the protection of the client, and that there is no ground for any further protection when he waives it. That when a con federate in a criminal case turns^ State’s evidence and has atl tempted to convict others b\l E roof, also convicting himself, e has no right to claim any privilege concerning any of the facts bearing upon the issue.! That if he could be permitted to] hold back anything upon the ground that it was a privileged communication between attor ney and client, injustice might be done the defendant, either by the keeping back of testi mony which would tend to his acquittal, or which would so discredit the witness as to in duce the jury wholly to disre gard his previous testimony; that the testimony of a witness who turns State’s evidence comes in such questionable shape, that it should in the in terest of truth and justice, be subjected to the severest scru tiny and acted on with the greatest caution; that there is no case in which cross exami nation is more desirable and im portant to test the credit of a witness, than that in which one man is seeking to save his own life and liberty and swearing away the life or liberty of others In connection with this subject, the attention of his excellency is called to the ‘statement of the case and points and author] ities of appellant,’ Jos. W James, filed in t h e Supreme Court, at the November term, isao. But granted our own courts are right, and those of the other States enumerated, all wrong, that the statements made by Scott to his attorney were privileged, and that the latter was prevented by the rules of law from divulging them on the witness stand, then the de fendant, James, was restrained by a legal technicality from having both sides of the case developed before the jury. It is not disputed that Scott told two stories which were totally at variance with each other. The jury got one criminating James, but the other was kept from them. In appearing, how ever, before his excellency with a prayer for the exercise of clemency, no technicalities of the law can prevent both of Scott’s stories being presented to him, so that he can weigh them carefully side by side and reach a just conclusion as to whether, in view of the other story which he told, the human mind could arrive at the con clusion beyond a reasonable, doubt, that Jos. W. James hired | the hand of assassins to murder his aged father. “Old man James was thor oughly despised in the com munity in which he lived. He was high-tempered, ignorant and dictatorial; he was, more over, a miser and an inveterate rake. So great was this last named evil propensity of his that, as is well known in the community in which he lived, he had broken up many a home among the colored people by coming in between husband and wife. As is to be supposed, un der such circumstances, he had a perfect host of enemies, and he had been shot at from am bush no less than three distinct times before his life was finally taken. On every one of these occasions certain parties were arrested and tried for the shoot ing, the theory of the State rest ing in every case, upon the idea that the old man's rakish pro clivities had brought him into the trouble. About the time of the third of these trials which occurred a year or two before the old man was killed, it began to be whispered that Joseph W. James was at the bottom of the trouble. There is strong reason to believe that this suspicion owed its origin to one who was a bitter personal enemy of the father and the son; anyhow this was the party who first inform ed the old man of it. On hear ing what he had to say the old man became furiously angry with his informant, cursed him violently and never spoke to him again as long as he lived. On the contrary, the father con tinued to go around with his son as before, and seemed to have the utmost confidence in him. If the theory of the defense be correct, that is that Joseph W. James had nothing to do with the death of his father, but that Bill Scott was the real origi nator and ex -cutor of the diaboli cal design against the old man, when Scott is apprehended and brought to jail, cut off from his fellow creatures, and intimida ted by all the many circum stances which tend to crush down the ignorant and helpless under such conditions, with his life, as ho imagined, hanging on a mere thread, compelled to find a scape goat for his sins be fore he was undone, whom, un der the circumstances, would it most naturally occur to him to charge with having instigated to revolting crime? Once announce a theory in a rural community where news is scarce and there is little to talk about, where the slight est piece of gossip is talked over, from every standpoint until it is threadbare, and you can easily find the facts to build up to that theory and can establish it as a truth by starting out with it and working backwards —particularly if t h e circum stances of the case are of as an unusual and sensational nature, as they were in the James mur der. To free himself in his dire extremity, Scott remembers the whispers he had heard about Joseph W. James and boldly lays at the latter’s door the re sponsibility for his own foul crime; then certain people of the neighborhood in which James lived, many of them utterly un worthy of belief, came forward with all sorts of incidents to support his theory, not one of which would have the shadow of a substance to rest its atten uated length upon if you elimi nate from the case Scott’s state ment on the stand, and that statement, as has been seen, is by no means removed beyond the realms of doubt and uncer tainty. “Let us briefly consider why this terrible story against young James gained such currency, for patricide is a horrid crime and the human mind is loath to believe a charge of this kind. First, as to young James’ hab its of life : He consorted with negroes and was frequently in company with these two very men, Scott and Williams. On the night the old man was laid out Joe was seen t j hold a con versation with Bill Scott near the well in the yard. One of the strongest points in the State’s case was that a witness named Fields said he heard Joe say to Scott, “I’ll pay you;” the witness confessed, however, that at the time, he thought the remark had reference to the old man’s grave. But the father of the witness Fields, has said since the trial in the presence of Mr. Thomas H. Stokes, the fore man of the petit jury charged with the trial of the case, and in the presence ot others also, that his son had lied on the stand; that his son had frequent ly told him that he had not heard what had passed between Scott and James at the well, and that since his son had de livered himself of his purjured testimony, he. the father, had turned him out of the house. “Young James not only con sorted with negroes, as we have said, but it is more than proba ble that he had more than once heard them curse and abuse his father in his presence. They had reason to hate him and they made no concealment of their feelings. Joseph W. James is naturally of a very phlegmatic disposition, takes everything easy; there is no doubt about his father having been mean to him, and yet the evidence shows that he was a perfectly respect ful and obedient son and had never given his father a cross word in his life; that the two were inseparable and were in variably seen together in their rides and walks about the coun try. Good hearted, indifferent, with little education, never taught to restrain his animal passions, surrounded by the very lowest influences all his life, he must not be measured by our standard but by his own surroundings. His evil com panions, his disposition, and many other circumstances con spired to lend some color to the tneory of the State. His moral sense is blunted—there can be no doubt of that—and that is the reason he is now suffering for this crime. A thorough sift ing of the testimony, going to corroborate Scott, in the light of the circumstances surround ing James’ life as outlined above, will reveal the fact that they are absolutely without any significance as indicating his guilt or innocence and they will not be regarded for a mo ment. The State says he killed his father or tried to have him killed, immediately after the old man had executed his will, leaving all he had to his son. A strong point ? Yes; but it must be remembered that the son was the old man’s only heir. He would have gotten all the property at his father’s death even if there had not been a will, so why was he so anxious for the death of the old man af ter the execution of the will than he had been before ? “The fact that 1,500 citizens of Darlington county, a large number of whom were women, have signed a petition for James’ pardon is an indication that there is a feeling of unrest in the public mind; that a consid erable portion of the people of Darlington county do not want to see a man kept in prison all his life on circumstantial evi dence, bolstered up by the con fession of a negro thief and as sassin. The petition is signed by Mr. Thomas H. Stokes, the foreman of the jury which con victed James, who feels dissat isfied, and now thinks that the defendant ought to be pardoned. It has also been signed by two of our representatives in the Legislature, nearly every one of the county officers, and by the prosecutor himself, ex-8heriflf Cole, who, more than any other person living, accomplished, by his untiring efforts, the convic tion of the defendant. In fact, taken all in all, it is one of the strongest papers ever sent out of Darlington county. The principle signers are the people from the country—those who have known James from his youth up to now; those who knew his father, Bill Scott and all the circumstances surround ing the lives and characters of all of them. It has been signed by the men who took enough in terest in the fate of their fellow citizen to crowd the court house day after day while the long trial lasted, and who are yet un convinced. “A great many things have conspired to prejudice the de fendant’s case. As your excel lency is aware, the Constitution forbids a circuit judge from rging on the facts in the case. In this connection we woul 1 ask your excellency to read Judge Pressley’s charge on the occasion of James’ first trial. The answer to this argument of ours will be that James was compensated for the injustice inflicted upon him by Judge Pressley when the Supreme Court granted him a new trial Did that make amends for the injury he had received ? On the contrary, there are people in Darlington to-day who have never heard the evidence who believe that James is a guilty man simply because Judge Pressley said he thought so—so highly is the legal opinion of this great jurist regarded—and we respectfully submit that this unwarranted expression of opin ion on the part of Judge Press- ley has given a coloring to the case which affects it to this day. “In passing, we must not for get to mention the fact that af ter James was arrested, and be fore he was tried, he was let to bail in the sum of $4,000. He ( [ave the bond and was set at iuerty, and the friends who stood his security were so in demnified against loss by him that if he had wanted to leave it only remained for him to do so. “It is also worthy of note that the present presiding judge of this circuit, Hon. R. C. Watts, who followed the case with in terest at the time of the trial, is convinced that the defendant was not tried fairly, and does not hesitate to so express him self. “Rarely does it fall to the lot of one charged with crime to be as utterly destitute of family ties as was this defendant, a statement which is not made for the purpose of arousing un due sympathy for him, but in order to present to the mind of ] vour excellency a view of the ! case which is well worthy of! consideration, namely, the kind- j ly offices in an affair of this kind which can be performed by a man’s relatives better than by any one else in the world. Kin less and alone, there has been no chance of arousing sympathy . in his favor by an appeal to ties ! of blood or family influence 1 which have availed with more fortunate men, and the only i ones whom Joseph W. James now has standing by him are those who have been attracted to his cause by a firm belief in his innocence and the natural regret they feel that such a man should pass his whole life in the penitentiary.” CACTIOR.—If m df»l-r o(I-r» W. Douglas hhosa ot a roducMl prior, or SOTS ho boa them without name stamped oa bottom, pot him dawa a* a fra ad. Invited. Darlington Lodge No. 7, Knightii of Pythi! an, meets on 1st and 3rd Tuksday Evenings in eaeh month, at I astle Hall, Florence street, opposite Broad. Visit ing brothers fraternally a.O Mies »8 ®M|JYS \75 W. L. Douglas 4fto OUrkET BESTIR 90 Om/Bi THE WORLD. W. It. DOUGLAS Shoe* are •tylish, easy fit- tiny, ind give better satisfaction stthc prices ad vertised than any other make. Try one pair and be convinced. The stamping of W. L. Douglas* name and price on the bottom, which guarantees their value, saves thousands of dollars snrually to those who wear them. Dealers who push the sale of W. L. Douglas Shoes gain customers, which helps to increase the sales on their full line of goods. They can afford to sell at a less nrotit. and we believe you esn save money by buying all ■ ‘ a< | ve rtte<l below. Watches Repaired AND WARRANTED, — AT — MASON’S JEWELRY STORE. Febl6—tf Catalogue free upon application. Address, LAd, Brockton, Mass. Sold hw your footwear of the dealer Catalogue frf *’ W. L. DOUGJ A.. J. BROOM, Darlington, S. C. Febl—9m | P Vow. O-/0 uici t? V- ■■ puJsrOT\sj7 ) (l' ThE DaR,Li^qro^/)f ' ~ JoP, Orpiee WHNTEDI Our customers and friends throughout the county to know that we have just opened the Largest Stock of Goods We have ever had the pleasure of offering to the public, and that these goods were bought with a view to the present hard times, which means that in order to sell this large stock, we pro pose TO WORK ON SMALLER PROFITS. We ask the people of Darlington and adjoining counties] to sustain us by giving us their patronage and we will not disap point them. Remember, our stock embraces everything in the way of Dry Goods, Clothing, Shoes, Hats. Hardware, And Groceries. Respectfully, BRUNSON, LUNN & CO. J.D. BMIRD “The Furniture Man” Has a large and varied stock of Fancy I THE “CALIGRAPH.” It is now ""N Thirteen years since the “Caliqraph” Typewriter kwas first put upon the mar ket and in all that time has responded faithfully to what is required of a first-class writing machine. The Caligraph is recognized everywhere as the most simple and most durable typewriter. It is easily learned, does beautiful work, and will last a decade, if properly cared for. In speed contests it has repeatedly taken first place and in telegraphic work has nevei been excelled. For manifold work it has no superior. With interchangable parts the Caligraph is well nigh indestructible. The expe rience of business men, ministers, telegraphers, short hand schools and government departments all go to prove that the Caligraph is without a peer. SOLD OUST E-A.STT TEBMS which can be ascertained by applying at The Dar lington News Office. C. Irvine Walker, Jr.,<feCo., GENERAL AGENTS, 6 BROAD STREET, - - CHARLESTON, S. C. What is Castorla Is Dr. Samuel Pitcher’s prescription for Infimts and Children. It contains neither Opium, Morphine nor ether Narcotic substance. It is a harmless substitute for Paregoric, Drops, Soothing Syrups, and Castor Oil. It is Pleasant. Its guarantee is thirty years’ use by Millions of Mothers. Costoria is the Children’s Panacea —the Mother’s Friend. Castoria. “Castoria is so well adapted to children that I recommend it as superior to any prescription known to me." IT. A. Archer, M. D., Ill Go. Oxford St., Brooklyn, N. Y. “ The use of ‘ Castoria ’ is so universal and its merits so well known that it seems a work of supt.-erogation to endorso it. Few ore the intelligent families who do not keep Castoria within easy reach." Cjju.os JLartyn, D. D., New York City. Castoria. Castoria cures Colic, Constipation, Sour Stomach, Diarrhoea, Eructation, Kills Worms, gives sleep, and promotes di gestion, Without injurious medication. “For several years I have recommended your ‘Castoria,’ and shall always continue to do so os it has invariably produced beneficial results." Erwin F. Pardee, M. D n 125th Street and ?th Ave., Now York Ctty. The Centacr Compi nr, 77 Murray Street, New York City LAW CARDS. R. W. BOYD. GKO. W. BROWS BOYD A BROWN- Attorneys and Connselors at Law Office in brick building south of the Bank of Darlington. DARLINGTON G B., & C. PROMPT PERSONAL ATTENTION TO ALL BUSINESS. WHITING at 15°, 20°, 25° & 30° A YARD. The latest thing out is our Matting Rugs. We have them in asssorted patterns. Just received, a large line of Opaque and Scotch Holland WINDOW SHADES mounted on the Hartshorn Spring Stop Rollers. We are pleased to state that we are selling the above goods much cheaper than they have ever been sold in this market. Come in and see us. Jan 4— «. W. DARGASt. H. T. THOMPSON. DARGAN & THOMPSON, Attorneys at Law, Office in Darlington Guards’ Armory building, lower floor. Darlin/fton. S. 6’* Eftablifhed 1858. Re Established 1889. BOWLES. Painter. Insure Vour Property WITH F. E. IsTOtR^EHsTT, Who represents the lib mu me m is m ms \ Satisfaction Guaranteed. Represents Twelve Firet- daee Companies. September 11.1890 E. O. WOODS. T. H. SPAIN WOODS&SPA1N, (Successors to Ward & Woods,) Attorneys & Counsellors at Law. Offices formerly occupied by Ward & Woods, over Bank of Darlington. Practise in State and Federal Courts. Prompt personal atten tion to all business. THE MUTUAL LIFE IHSURAHCE COMPANY OP NEW YORK RICHARD A. McCURDY, President Tot tho yew ending December Si, 1893 Income Rewired for Pmalma Freni nil other w.rcci |3n,f'u,sr.: 01 ill $<l,M:;,14i l* Disbursements t20,ss.-,,4T3 n fl,4S4,S 7 41 t>; To Policy-holder. For nil other ncconnt. - Assets CnKed State. Bond, and other Hecnrltle. - . . 873,S30.3S3 41 Pint lien l.oan, on Bond and Hortgnye .... 9.1 l oan, ot Stork, and Benda , ,4!r. 00 Real Eilat. .... ls,ostJ,l.i1 »:> Cash In Bank, and Tnut Com. panie. .... 10,S44,C01 S3 iccroed Interot, Deferred Pw. ml.mqdc, - . . . e t C09 ! C08 S'> _ . ti(Mi l ;d;,88o it Bwerre for Polleln. and other Uabllltlen - . . ld9.7tli.eTl S t Snrplu. ■ . . ||17,l»i3,*6s~ J Innrane. and Aanallle. auanied and reuem-d Nom—lonumne. ] kUlmnt all hnidud. —lamne. nmly nrilttt 1. 4 ; u wkoIlT aiiikidje, i d anlr i 1 pud for in euk is iaeludO. t:os,ct>2,5:3 n sanH frratt s Lnmass utaaT.y I haw carefully examined the fotecoln r Stale- ment and find the same to be correct. CiiAhuu A. PanuaiB, Auditor From th. Surplus a dividend will be apportioned aa usual. ROBERT A. QRANNI88, Vna-Plittiotnr Waite* R. Gillette General Maria- Isaac F. Lloyd stl Vice-Pros Je Fnnnnmc Cnosnrnu. Troisui Emory McCuntock ll.d. *.la. Aciua F. H. HYATT, General Agent, for South Carolina COLUMBIA, S. B. F. CAMPION. To Our Customers of the Pee Dee Section: We have decided here after to conduct our business in your terri tory direct with buyers. We can thus better as sure you of prompt at tention, low prices, and clear agreements not liable to misunderstand ing and confusion as in past under a different system. To responsible and honorable buyers we will make it an object to correspond with us, and we want to deal with no other class. Write us for prices on any make or kind of machinery you want, and we will make an honest effort to serve your best interests. W. H. GIBBES, JR., & CO., COLUMBIA, S. C. , Jec28—ly DiMitgriigii Mire Hairing o Old Furniture Made to Look as Well as New. WORK ROMUTED. Exchange street, in rear of Dar lington Guards’ Armory. DARLINGTON, - - - S. C. Feb8—tf Great Barge IS Sewing Mach: Some of them almost as goc ore now offered at the I Armory building THOMPSON, Attc the White Sewing Machine W.B. McCIRhll.l Offers his professiuuai the people of Darlington a Office OTer the store of Ed pent * do. Jap 19,’»0-Iy