The Darlington news. (Darlington, S.C.) 1875-1909, June 07, 1888, Image 1
,t. c. • ‘t” I’ttwTTmBiin I
THE DARLINGTON NEWS,
PUBLIBHM' BVIRYTHU&8DAY MORNINQ
HENRY T. THOMPSON.
paOPRIGTUR.
rKUtS—$2 Per Annum in Advance.
One Square, firet insertion $1.00
One Square, second insertion 60
Every eubseqent insertion... 60
Contract advertisements inserted upon the
most reasonable terms.
Marriage Notices and Obituaries, not
•seceding six lines, inserted free.
DARLINGTON NEWS.
VOL. XIV. NO 23.
DARLINGTON, .8 0.. THURSDAY, JUNE 7, 1888.
WHOLE NO 699.
to
•‘From the Sublime,” etc.
Twasevening, and the moon’s pale beem
Shown through the leafy boughs,
When, stealing from the ball room’s
gleame
And glare, we wandered forth
dream,
Of love, and loving tows.
How far we went, how time did fly.
Did not engage my mind.
I only felt that sus was nigh,
Pathetic, sympathetic, shy,
The soul of woman kind.
And still we dreamt mid silence bright,
Of love, and loving vows,
And still the Empress of the Night,
Drilfused sweet rays of mellow light.
Among the leafy boughs.
But, suddenly, the time and place
Of all romance was reft;
Tbe maiden moon's mqjeslio face,
Was hidden in a cloud’s embrace.
And we in darkness left.
And suddenly my peerless Kate—
My sympathetic dass—
In low ana faltering voice did state
“Oosnl LBTS 00 HOMB, IT MOST BE LATE,
They'vt turned of the gaJl"
J. L. M.
Darlington, S. C., June 1, 1888.
The Clemson Bequest is Sate as well
as Opportune.
Below in au open letter from Col.
B. W. Edwards, of Darlington, to
Col. D. K. Norris which was pub
lisbed in tbe Neira and Courier of
Juue 1st. The letter is written con
cerniug tbe Clemson bequest. Col.
Edwards tbiuk^ that tbe State
should take advantage ot this mu-
uificeiit gilt ami his reasons there
for are clearly set forth in the com
muuicaiiou which we re-publisb.
Au editorial from the AVtos
and Courier coiict-iiiiug the same
is appended.
The article of i he Columbia Reg-
wfer, copied into other papers of
the Stale, is not likely to trouble
tbe legal profession, and far less
the practical statesman.
Does not ihe writer know, if he
has examined the abstract of Mr.
Ciemson’s will, as published iu The
Newt and Courier of April 2S, thai
the trustees named tbereiu could
not, by any act of .heirs, defeat tbe
right o! the State to tue legal own
ership and control ol the property
lor tbe purpose of establishing an
agricultural college as provided t
If the persons named have organiz
ed under the directions ot the will,
lor tbe purpose ot preserving the
property , it is a puzzle to any or
dinary thinker to conjecture how
that inaugurates a “private college,”
which cannot possibly have an ex
isteuce under three years, unless
the Slate sooner comes iu and
positively rejects the otter. As well
might tbe writer say tnat tbe acts
of the executor in marshalling tbe
pioperty and preserving it, as re
quired, had defeated the ends of
the will, despoiled t e State aud
convened the property to piivate
uses. Tbe State has this otter,
which s auds open for three years,
against all claimants under the
will.
It is wholly gratuitous to assume
that the trustees named by Mr.
Clemson have organized a private
college, or that they are demand*
ing of the State to take the appro
priations from the Citadel Acade
my and ott^r institutions aud turn
them over to the Clemsou College.
Ou the coutrary they are only ask
ing that the muuiflcenl donation of
a distinguished citizen shall be ac
cepted by tbe State and made
efficient. And why should the
State hesitate to accept it, aud even
add loir, if need be, snob liberal
provisions as will make it a bless
ing to the whole people f
It is idle to say, it is too late to
say, that tbe State cannot accept a
donation upon condition that she
will devote it to the purpose speci
fied.
Has she not accepted the land
scrinftind on condition that it be
npplied to a certain kind of educa
tion f and is she not fuittliing that
condition by the training given in
her University 1 Has she not ac
cepted the provisions ot the Hstcb
bill open conditions now being ful
filled i Have not all the States
accepted of aid from the General
Government to be devoted ex-
C :ly ' to educational purposes f
hot South Carolina, in conven
tion, commuted herselt to tbe policy
ot net only accepting, bat ot solicit
ing deostious from tbe Govern-
meat ter tbe specific purpose of
edecetinx her people f Has she
not already devoted and appropriat
ed funds for tbe enlargement of an
insIHatioa founded by the private
benefhsCkms of Mr. Clsflin, which
inatitotion is alike honoring to him
anddreditabie to the Stole! Has
she not appropriated funds for tbe
edo«*tiafc of teachers in the Win*
thrdp Training School, In eonneo-
tiou with the private Peabody
find!
▲nd what more need be said 1
Perhapa the Regiater does not ob
ject to the I sat named appropria
tion, and the blending of State aid
and private provisions tor this
desirable work. And porsibly no
objection would be fonod to tbe
State’s assuming tbe administration
of the Clemson fond, and enlarging
It too, if it were practicable to in-
vest it in connection with the ex*
g eriment station of he University,
y those at least who supported
the University schetre. And why
this uarrow policy of limiting and
centializing education T The argu
ment has heretofore been that the
State could not afford to establish
an agticnltural college. And uow
that the property has been donated
tor its establishment, tbe opposi
turn seems fain to flud some inade
quacy in the scheme—some giound
of rejecting the proposition. This
opposition bears close resemblance
to that pclicy which denies to others
tbe enjoyment of things which yon
oaunot enjoy yourself. Is there a
jealous antagonism to every iustitu
lion of learning that claims public
favor, except that which has been
tbe pet, and jnst pride too, of South
Carolina for two or three genera
tions! Or do the frieuds ot the
University really see phantoms of
destructive mien in every proposi
tion to enlarge the benefits of high
er and direhufied cuiture! That
party in South Carolina which cries
tor more light aud wider intelli
gence is no phantom—its name is
legion.
If he is benefactoi who cans* s
two blades of grass to grow where
bnt one grew before, what shall we
say of him who sows tbe seeds ot
knowledge abroad ! aud what shall
the harvest be for tbe State that
“sows beside all waters!” And
bow will she vindicate herself to the
next generation if she neglects th<-
preseut opportunity ! It is surely
most unreasonable to deny to the
youth of tbe State that culture tor
which they pant, aud which will
better fit them for life’s fierce bat
tle, when it is made optional with
tier te supply it without burden to
herself or her people. She cannot
afford to do it! Theopposers them
selves will be amazed at their posi
tion when they come to look at
tbeir policy with tbe sober second
thought which sets everything in
its true light.
Is there any alarm in the fact
that the will provides for a major
ity of the board of trustees for the
co'lege! There is no ground for
such anxious forebodings. Their
powers are limited to their own
perpetuation, and iu all other re
spects they will be subject, like tbe
trustees elected by the State, to
legislative control There cau be
no conflict of authority, for the will
confears on them no power ot ad
minisiralioii whatever. It only
prescribes the mode of election ;
amt all othes powers will be derived
from tbe State. Moreover, if there
should be conflict iu tbe manage
ment of the affairs of tbe institu
tion tbe State can lose nothing ex
cept what she may choose to add
to funds donated. And in case ot
irreconcilable conflict she cau at
any time withdraw her appropria
tions.
But perhaps there is some real
apprehension that the friend* of
the agricultural college haibor fell
designs against other State institu
tions, and purpose the dismantling
of the University itself. Let it be
said, once for all, that they have uo
such purpose. They only demand
that tbe State shall add to its edu
cational facilities, and that they
shall have a liberal participation
in its benefits. Tbe demand is rea
souable. Aud its persistent denial
to the people will raise up multi
tudes ot enemies to the favored in
stitutions, because, whether wisely
or uuwisely, they will lay the blame
at their doors. And though they
have no desire to contract or re
strict the efficiency of the Univer
sity, they will persist in their just
claims, and wbl continue to resist
all measures that are partial aud
antagonistic to the widest culture
of tbe masses jtnd tbe most liberal
provisions for tbe dominant indus
try. And sooner or later these
claims must be heeded. They have
complained, and still complain,
that the State has not given them
tbe benefit of funds designated for
tbe kind of edocation for which
they crave provision. They ask for
the land scrip funds, the Hatch
fund, and any other funds which
may bear distinctive marks of an
agricultural aspect But there will
be no assignable opposition to tbe
replacement of those funds by ap
propriations where they are need
ed for University work.
There is no snbstoatial obstacle
to tbe acceptance of tbe Clemson
bequest and building up such an in
stitution upon that nucleus ws is
now demanded—demanded not only
by tbe people, bat by the natare of
oar indastries and the progress ot
this generation. This offer to the
State, at this time, is one oi those
snggestive events which mast be
regarded as tbe ooooarreut voice of
demand and opportonity. It is the
part of wisdom to heed that voice.
The Bight Spirit
(Editorial la Now* and Couritr.)
The open letter of tbe Hon. B.
W. Edwards, of Darlington, to Co!.
D. K. Norris, which is published
to-day, can be read with pleasure
and profit by every one who is in
terested in the subject of the Clem-
son Agrtcsltoial dollege. Mr. Ed
wards discusses this important sub
ject dispassionately, as it should be
discussed, aud it will be seen cov
ers nearly the whole ground in few
words.
The argnmeuts of the Columbia
Regiater that the State eauuot ac
cept tbe conditional Clemson be
quest is first and effectually dispos
ed of. Tbe property is absolutely
at tbe command of the State for
three years; the trustees named in
the will c.inno' defeat the right of
tbe State to assume ownership aud
and control, if they would, and tbe
couditious attached to the bequest
are not only such as the State cau
properly accept, but such as it has
accepted already, iu other eases
and in pursuauce of a well estab
lished policy in regard to its ednea
tional system. “There is no sub
stantial obstacle to tbe acceptance
of the Clemsou bequest,” or to tbe
full realization of tbe purpose for
which it was inteuded.
Nor is there any cause of embar
rassment in the constitution ot tbe
board of trustees. Tbe powers con
ferred by tbe will upon tbe trustees
appointed uuder it “are limited to
their own perpetuation.” In all
other respects they will be subject
to legislative control. No opening
is left tor conflict; there should be
no occasion lor conflict; and, in
case an irreconcilable conflict oc
curs, the State can at any time
withdraw her appropriatioos.
But, perhaps, the most gratify
ing expressions in Mr. Edwards’s
letter are those which relate to tbe
disposition of tbe friends of the
agricultural college towards other
State educational institutions, and
towards the cause of education in
get eral. There is no purpose, Mr.
Edwards declares, “once for all,”
to cripple other State institutions.
The ap(>eal aud demand are rather,
we are assured, for “the widest cul
ture ol the masses;” that the State
“shall,add to its educational facili
ties;” and that the importsnt agri
cultural interest of the State “shall
have a liberal participation” in the
benefits of so liberal a policy.
All this is not only “reasonable,”
as Mr. Edwards sa.\s; it is wise
and right aud acceptable to tbe
whole people. There is uo anta
gonism between tbe agricultural
aud other iuterests in South Caro
lina. There is no desire anywhere
to deny to the farmers of the State
aught that will conduce to their
welfare, or to withhold from them
the advantage of any fund to which
they are specially entitled. Tb<S
welfare o< the wfiole people is the
welfare of every pait, and nothing
cau conduce to the welfare of all
more certainly than tbe hearty and
efficient support of every kind of
educational institution that is now
in existence, or that can be added
to the nnmber of those in existence
Prospeiity aud progress lie that
way, and we can not well go too
far in tiie direction ofeducatiug the
youth of the State either on special
or general lines.
There is opposition to pulling
down any institution that has al
ready been built up with care and
patience, aud that is performing
the work appointed to it. It is well
that there is such opposition, for
it is one of the most encouraging
signs of the time iu South Carolina,
iu the earnest support of existing
schools lies i he sole hope and prom
ise of the schools yet 10 be estab
lished, including, first of all, tbe
College of Agriculture itself. We
cau accomplish little for any iustitu-
tion of learning by pulling and
pushing against each other. We
cau accomplish evetythiug that is
desirable, or even that is desired,
by working together, all for each
aud each for all.
This has been the argument aud
the position ot The Newt and Couriir
from the beginuiug, and we believe
that the views we have insisted on
will prevail, aud indeed already pre
vails, among the intelligent and
earnest citizens of the State ot
every class, aud of no class. There
is sympathy and effective support
for every one who proposes and
plans and labors to “add to “the
educational facilities” of tbe State.
There is none for obstructionists
aud wreckers iu this field ; there
should be none; aud there will be
none.
Must Never Drink Again-
Popeka, Kan., May 23.—A par
dou has been issued by Governor
Martin toObas. H. Rotrock of Ot
tawa Connty, who killed bis wife a
number of years ago while under
tbe influence of liquor. The pecu
liar feature of the pardon is the
fact that the Governor issnsed it
upon the condition that Rotrock
will forever abstain from tbe use of
intoxicating liquor. Such a condi
tion has never been imposed in a
pardon issued by a Governor of
this State. The Supreme Court of
Iowa has held tbat the Governor
may impose any condition he choos
es in granting a pardon, aud tbat
in case the condition is ever viola
ted the person pardoued rouy be
ream-sted on tbe order of the Gov
ernor and made to serve the bal
ance of the penalty. Attorney
General Bradford has advised the
Governor tbat such a condition ns
imposed is Rotrock’s pardon would
be sustained by the courte.
t
Ourjob department Usupplied with ev*i«
facility necessary to enable ua to compel e
both m toprice and quality of work, with e*er
thoee of ihe oitie*, and we guarantee eaii|
faction in every parlicularorcharge nothing
for our work. We are always prepared to
fill orders at short notice for Blanks, Bi)
Head*, Letter Heads. Cards, hand Bills
Postere, Circulars, t’amphlete. As,
AUjoh work must be paid for
Cash on Delivery.
Woods & Woods
THEIR STOCK OP
Spring and Summer Goods
rind now have it ready foi inspection;
this stock;
EMBRACES A FULL ASSORTMENT OF EVERYTHING
HANDLED BY THE FIRM.
THE LINE OF
Embracing all the Novelties in Worsted Goods, White Goods,
Ac., has received their special attention and the ladies
of Darlington County will find both pleasure and
profit, in inspecting the many beautiful arti
cles now on exhibition at their
ESTA.BlL.XSIT]VIE3INrT.
March 29, 1888.
John K. Wclver,
DEALER IN
HOTTSE ETJElSriSHIlSra- 0-00JDS,
F-XmiSriTXTRES,
Hardware, Wooden mid Willow-ware, Gl.isa-ware, Crockery and tin-ware
Window Shades, Cornice Poles, Matting, Carpeting, Pictures,
Mouldings, Ac, Ac.
A. EI3STE OF
Staple and Fancy
OEOGEEIES
HAS BEEN ADDED.
s®. The Patronage of the Public is Solicited. “«*
MI MM
k. ROGERY,
PEARLE - - - -
SALT,
SALT.
Jnst received at tbe Enterprise Grocery 200 Sacks Salt which we offer <
90 cents per Sack.
HAEEWAEE
-AKTD-
Agricultural Implements.
CONFECTIONERY, CIGARS
— AKB
TO B JiCCO.
A Harvest Field For
CASIX BTT YE: JFl SI
GAYSOY & BROOM.
BUYING FOR CASH-SELLING FOR CASH!
Getting bargains, -i. «r Giving Bargains.
That ia tbe magic power that is fast tearing asunder the shackh s of
High Picres
and conseeraton a new epoch iu the Dry Goods trade. Cold blooded an
tebellum profits—75 per cent, will not do, when tbe condition of tbe coun
try and the scarcity of money requires that every dollar should, it possi
ble, do double duty. We secure bargains anywhere aud everywhere ;
whether from the Auctioneer, the Assignee, the overstocked Manufac
turer, or the needy Jobber—it matters not since they are Bargains. Hence
we otter a line ot Hats, 1,600 iu all, of almost every kind, for men, youths
and children, at 25 per oeut. below first cost. We bought them at 35
cents on the dollar.
Next it is a Manufacture)’s Stock of Shoes ; some in brokdh lots bnt
all genuine Bargains We seil as we buy, and don’t ask II 25 for s shoe
we can sell for $1. 120 pairs ladies’ fine peb grain flexible shoes tbat co«t
first $1 40; our patce is $1.25. A splendid button Dongola goat solid note
shoe for $1.50, worth $2. Sixty pair Men’s Gaiters worth 12, now for $1 40
Space forbids mention of our New and lovely line of Dress Goods
Lawns and Piques, but we are prepared to say a woid about Notions
and Hosiery. Every uickle buys a great deal in this Bargain House.
5 cents will buy 3 papers of pins.
Scents will buy 3 pocket Handkerchief.
5 cents will buy 2 papers of needles.
5 cents will buy a pair of ladies’ hose.
5 cents will buy 3 bal s sewing thread.
10 cents will buy as much as 25 cents will at most places.
Notwithstanding we have bad a most gratifying Sprig trade tbna
tar, we most do better; better for our patrons aud ourselves. Have faith
to come and see for yourselves.
Very Resi>eotfull
GAYSON & BROOM.
April 13, ’88.
R ® SEN MB M Gl’sf
THE CHEAPEST
Place in Town for
Fine Dress Goods,
Goods,
Notions, Roots, Shoes and
■i
Hats,
GIVING AWAY 1 GIVING AWAY 1
I have on baud at my place of business a limited supply of be seed oi
that excellent variety of sugar cane known as the “Orange Cane,” which
I am prepared to distributa to my trieods and enstomers free of ooet.
A- S WHITE, Manager.
September 15, 87
Wines, Liquors, and
CIGARS.
■■ i
..