The sun. [volume] (Newberry, S.C.) 1937-1972, August 12, 1965, Image 2
PAGE TWO
THE NEWBERRY SUN, NEWBERRY, SOUTH CAROLINA
THURSDAY, AUGUST 12, 1965
>u«
1218 College St., Newberry, S. C. 29108
PUBLISHED EVERY THURSDAY
O. F. Armfield, Jr., Owner
Second-Class Postage Paid at Newberry, South
Carolina.
SUBSCRIPTION RATES: $2.00 per year in ad
vance :Six Months $1.25.
THE "SPECTATOR S” COLUMN
“Tuesday we noticed that FBI
agents were studying files relat
ing to private schools. Our curios
ity being aroused, we asked the
purpose of this search and re
ceived civil but non-committal
answers. A check with neighbor
ing newspapers indicated that the
search was similar and simultan
eous throughout the region.
One does not have to be a gift
ed detective to surmise the reason
back of this interest in private
schools. Someone in Washington
has instructed the FBI to assign
its agents to this subject as a part
of the ‘civil rights’ movement.
Their time—normally devoted to
running down criminals and other
useful work for the public inter
est—is being utilized for investi
gation of a subject heretofore held
in general esteem, but above all
as a private concern of the pro
prietors and clients of the schools.
What possible interest could the
federal government have in pri
vate schools of the South? (We
are assuming, without even troub
ling to inquire, that no such search
is in progress in the North.) Ag
ain we rely on surmise in seeking
a reason. In our opinion, the fed
eral government is determined to
discourage development of private
schools in the South as a refuge for
white children whose parents do
not wish to send them, for racial
or other reasons, to predominant
ly Negro public schools.
Whether the government has
legal power to interfere with pri
vate schools is another question.
We shall not attempt to answer
it today.
The use of FBI agents as inves
tigators for legal action to inte
grate private schools to us would
be regrettable—and we are using
th rt most restrained term that
comes to mind.”
I have quoted from the great
morning daily of Charleston, The
News and Courier.
I had heard of this from a cit
izen who expressed indignation.
Frankly I may speak as a law
yer and say that the Federal gov
ernment has no right or reason
to investigate the private schools
or those who send children to
private schools. There is no legal
authority to prevent the colored
citizens from organizing and
maintaining private schools, if
they should care to do so. And,
by the same token, there is no
legal authority or justification for
meddling with or investigating
private schools organized and
maintained by white citizens.
I have had an unusual exper
ience in a somewhat • analogous
case. As Director General in Peru,
all Government schools were • di
rectly under my office;, and all
private schools and colleges op
erated by license of my office,
though we did not examine the
patrdns. That general authority
Included The Catholic University
of Lima and The Nonnal school
ol the Ursuline Mothers. But Peru
is a far cry from the U. S., yet
I never dreamed of investigating
the patrons of private schools and
colleges. I am amazed at this
development in “The Land of the
Pilgrim’s Pride.”
My thoughts roam about and I
find myself wondering. Will our
government send FBI specialists
to investigate our churches on the
eve of calling pastors; or will it
investigate the Ministers?
ceeded his trading limits, acting
on his own initiative and without
authorization.”
“As the world witnesses this
summer’s display of outer apace
spectaculars, a small group of
Commerce Department planners
may begin to glimpse a bit more,
clearly a spectacular vision^ of
their own right here on. earth—
or more precisely, beneath the
earth’s surface. . - •
They hope to offer a basic ad
vance in inter-city transportation,
especially for travelers who, must
cope with the jammed highways
and congested airports that threat
en mobility in the nation’s most
populous area: The northeast cor
ridor that extends from N.ew Eng
land to Virginia and houses more
than a fifth of the nation’s pop
ulation.
Peer into the future some ten
years hence: In an underground
Boston station, a businessman
boards a Washington-bound train
of bullet-shaped vehicles which
ride on air. Leaving tfcne-
the train accelerates smoothly to
a speed of 400 miles.pec-.Jmpr..
The train may travel all the way
in a specially built tunnejj or if it
comes to the surface, i| vjhiz
along through ground-level tu&es.
Passengers bound for Providence,
Hartford or New York sit in
special cars that are peeled off
at the intermediate stops by el
ectronic conrtols without slowing
the train. In less than two hours
the Boston businessman arrives in
Washington—a trip that now takes
more than eight hours.
Only time is capable of separat
ing the optimism from the reality
of this estimate. What is very real
is the conviction of Mr. Nelson,
Mr. Seifert and others tha^ Bos-
ton-to-Washington ground travel
in less than two hours, far from
any ‘pipe dream,’ is ‘technologi
cally foreseeable,’ The problem is
to select the right kind of sys
tem—‘judging the jump’ as Mr.
Seifert call it. ‘What we’re hop
ing for is a major jump’ he says.
‘We want to select a method that
could be constructed at a reason
able cost in a reasonable time to
satisfy demand for enough into
Because of this illegitimate
14th Amendment, the States of
the Union have now lost their
historic Constitutional power to
regulate elections, along with the
right and duty to register and
qualify their voters.
Perhaps the most far-reaching
and important of these rulings of
the Supreme Court, is the recent
one based on the 14th Amendment
that each State is required to re
district and reapportion both
houses of its legislature on a one-
man^ one-vote population basis,
regardless of a contrary direction
by the people of the State.
T\yenty-six states have now pe
titioned Congress to call a Cons
titutional convention to reverse
this undemocratic one-man, one-
vote ’ ruling, and Congress is de
bating the proposal of a new
Constitutional Amendment to
change this strange and sudden
judicial extension of the old Am
endment, the 14th, so-called, which
has no legitimate existence.
' In the meantime, give some
study to this trend and see for
yourself whether or not you are
ready to trade the entire Consti
tution for the current construc
tions of the 14th Amendment.
Looking A. head
...by Dr. Gtorg* S. Bvnson
PRESIDENT—NATIONAL
EDUCATION PROGRAM
SMrcy, ArUitMt
the future and permit orderly evo».
lution.’
This judgment involves much
more than technology, of course.
There’^ the consider^ion of
cost. Mr. Seifert thinljfc-vthe sys
tem qould be built formless .than
half’ the $8.5 billion sp6nt each
year by Uncle Sam for highways.
Mr. Seifert believes the system
would be self-supporting after
the initial costs were taken care
of.”
r
Dean Manion
THE
MANX
FORUM
A generator of the
turbing important new|^
times, is the prolific p r
torical sedimentation t
the name of the 14th
to tne Constitution of
Shall the government investi- States. It is high tim
gate a County Grand Jury!
Shall we have Federal inves
tigation of teachers, lawyers, phy
sicians ?
What does this mean? Where
is the Congress while the execu
tive department brushes aside
all the age-old rights, privileges
and liberties of our Constitutional
guarantees ?
Are we to enjoy the liberties
won from old King John at Run-
riymede in 1215 and all the kings
since? Or are the labors arid sac
rifices of our American patriots
now just a memory, a sort of
Fourth of July flourish?
In all seriousness I call upon
Congress of the United States to
curb the Executive and to re-as-
sure the citizens of our Nation
that we still enjoy all the freedom
won by our ancestors?
“First National City Bank di
vulged details of foreign exchange
transactions in its Brussels branch
that caused the bank a $4 million
loss, first reported last month.
Edwin A! Reichers, vice presi
dent in charge of Citibank’s for
eign exchange trader in the Brus
sels office. He said the man
‘operated independently and ex
Before the entire United States
Constitution goes into a total, per
manent eclipse behind the burg
eoning false pretense of an Am
endment which does not legally
exist;, the so-called 14th, let us
take’a look at the birth certificate
of the Amendment and the facts
surroundng its long and active
life. !
A century ago, plus a few
months, the bitter and bloody war
between the states had just ended
and Lincoln had been inaugurated
for the second time as President
oT'fhe United States. The domin
ant wing of Lincoln’s political par
ty in Congress was bent upon re
venge against the defeated Con
federates. These Representatives
and Senators had had the halls of
Congress to themselves during the
war while the seats of eleven. Con
federate .states were empty. In ’65,
northern Congressional politicians
wer£ horrified at the prospect
that all of these empty seats
might soon be filled with decisive
votes again,st their vindictive
plans to “reconstruct” the South.
But Lincoln’s second inaugural
address showed that he proposed
to bind up the Nation’s wounds
with “malice toward none and
with charity for all.” If Lincoln
had : lived to carry out his charit
able! plan we would now be spared
the jgrowing pains of the said 14th
Ami mdment.
L ncodn had made some pro
gress for the reconstruction Of the
Untyn before his second inaugura-
tioni In March of 1864, a Louisia
na State government was estab
lishing to supersede the Union
Army’s military rule. On February
16, “1865, the newly constituted
Louisiana legislature ratified the
T3th Amendment which abolished
slavery.
At that time there were thirty-
six states, including the eleven
southrn States. Ratification of
this proposed Amendment by the
legislatures of 3-4 of these 36
^States was required. On Decem
ber 18, 1865, the Secretary of
State announced and certified that
27 states had ratified the 13th
Amendment and it was thereafter
a part of the Constitution. Eight
wbf 4he 27 states so ratifying the
endment, t were former Gen
erate State's Which were offici-
acknowldged to have been
ly reconstructed, with legiti-
legislattires.
hen the 14th Amendment was
proposed, the * then --. President
on opposed it because of" its
terms, and he encouraged
the Southern States to refuse to
y it, and ten of them did do.
out' the ten States necessary
of the then 37 States could
obtained. But Congress was
be thwarted, and in 1867 it
d the Reconstruction Act
t swept away the existing so-
“unlawful” governments in
n Southern States and plac-
ese States under military
ile. The Act provided that this
situation would remain until these
ten States provided new Constitu
tions which would give suffrage
TO TRADE OR NOT TO TRADE
The U. S., if it does not ap
proach the problem with more
wariness, may get rooked in in
creasing ways * by international
Communism in the matter of for
eign trade. We live in an age in
which the industrial nations as
well as the commodity producers
require foreign trade to exist eco
nomically. The Soviet Union to
some extent is finding that a clos
ed society is not entirely practica
ble when it comes to the process
of buying and selling. Yet, even
though their delegations are bar
gaining throughout the free world
their Iron Curtain is far from
breached because of it.
Some of our allies are enjoying
a brisk business with our common
enemy. It is reported that 42 per
cent of shipping to North Viet
nam in a recent period was done
in British bottoms, and other free
nations have been doing most of
the rest. But we can hardly com
plain to friendly nations dealing
with Castro and Ho Chi Minh,
when we ourselves have not ceas
ed trading with the Communist
bloc. These nations have vowed
to destroy us and occasionally
show that they mean it by blow
ing up our embassies and shooting
our boys. Some of our own busi
ness organizations seem to think
they can defeat Communism by
co-existers obviously want the U.
S. to make strong the miserable
economies of the Communist bloc,
with the false hope that when they
reach maturity they will cease
their efforts to destroy us and
dominate the world. But we must
let the Russians themselves take
the lead in opening their closed
society, a process in which little
progress has come about so far.
U.S. taxpayers must not be caught
subsidizing Red trade or allow our
businessmen to do it. Since we
are already spending more than
$50 billions a year to protect our
selves with military might from
these very people, why not be a
bit consistent?
Freedom and Trade
this
A policy of restraint in
matter is not inconsistent with
our general purposes of free
trade. We may well be worried
today about various artificial bar
riers that increasingly darken the
prospects of the free-market sys
tem. One of the worst is inflation
that brings restrictions, agree
ments, and other protectionist de
vices of one kind or another.
Some of the less developed na
tions are exploring regressive pol
icies, and a few look even to the
political nostrums of socialism or
communism while clinging to their
nationalism. There are no econo
mic reasons why these nations
should accept socialism.
We must encourage them to
keep the kind of enterprise, incen
tive, market economy that built
America. It can also build the
have-not nations. Instead of spend
ing their energy and efforts in
trying to grab wealth from other
lands (and the U. S. pushing for-
strengthening it with our trade. e jg n a jd in them), the smaller na-
" nm ‘* rWM>l0 T, “' 1 'tions must start where they are
u.s to examine this
so-called, because the fact is that
the 14th Amendment was never
ratified by the required 3/4of* A . ..
the duly constituted legttiteSV.S'SF* ^ Negroes, and only then
the States ot the UnioM tf nd.,’ff‘ d T ‘ he 3 r be reived back into
therefore, is’ not and never* nas ' mon '
been a valid part of thbOCjMfsIM ..When we remember that t h e
Civil war was fought and won on
the theory that the Confederate
States could not legally secede,
and that the 13th Amendment had
been ratified by some of these
same Southern legislatures that
were now dissolved as “unlawful.”
the picture begins to beclouded.
So it came about that the States
that could not get out of the
Union, and which had ratified the
13th Amendment, were now re
admitted to the Union, after per-
f(Honing under duress the pres-
precedent, namely, the rat-
on of the 14th Amendment.
‘ ~«iT ■urlrcTr*
tution.
However, notwithstanding'their
sinister origin, the modern prolif
erations of the 14th Amendment
have all but pushed the main
body of our authentic- Constitu
tion out of the sight of our Su-
preme Court.
Relying upon the 14I3U
ment, the Supreme Co
ed that prayer cannot
in public schools, and
producing pornography
permitted to be sold
newsstands. The 14th,
is the protection given^
breakers because police^
afraid to move in with
to stop the criminals, les
instead of the criminals, end up
as the accused. Some hundred
thousand convicts no
State penitentiaries are
ly expecting to be freed because
their lawyers were no
when they were accused.
ey,
COUNTY BUILDING PERMITS
Mr. and Mrs. H. A. Kemper,
one brick veneer and cement build-
*on College .street extension,
r,poo.
Vernon O’Dell Ruff, one brick
veneer dwelling on Route four,
Newberry $5000.
£lome Deals Are Bad
However, it must be said that
some distinction of honor should
go to those few business firms,
notably including Goodyear Tire
and Rubber, who refuse business
deals with the Soviet Union even
when these are cleared by too
careless government officials. It
makes no sense to let the Reds
in on our production know-how,
especially when it involves stra
tegic matters. It is not selfishness
or bad manners to refuse to deal
with a gangster who has guns in
your back around the world. Evi
dence of good faith should be a
requirement, not some nebulous
statement from a Senator about
building bridges.
The government itself has been
far from guiltless. The Wheat
deals with Moscow were scandal
ous enough, but how the Secretary
of Commerce talks of eliminating
entirely the restrictions on selling
strategic goods to the Red bloc.
While it is true, again, that our
allies take advantage of our ad
herence to export controls (West
Europe having sent $32 billions
of critical items to Sino-Soviet
countries from 1952 to 1962), we
are not gaining in our race with
Communism if we lift them out
of the mire of socialism to which
they insist they will reduce us.
Trade and Tensions
The Administration’s encourag
ement of American-Soviet trade
delegations, of councils for trade
proposals, of “peace-with-profits”
co-existence, should all be chal
lenged warily by the American
people. „ ^ .
At any rate, the cooperators and
and progress according to their
own work and purpose. Free
trade under free market conditions
is a blessing that will make their
growth possible and insure growth
of their free institutions.
Marriages...
Joseph Edward Turner of Pros
perity and Barbara Ellen Wede-
man of Pomaria, were married on
August 1 at Pomaria by Rev. A.
B. Ruff.
Jonas Earl Frick Jr. of McColl
and Jennie Ruth Eargle of Little
Mountain, were married at Peak
on August 1 by Rev. William T.
Kyzer.
Virgil C. Harmon and Gladys
L. Trammell of Whitmire, were
married at Newberry by Probate
Judge Frank H. Ward on Aug
ust 2.
J
BID ADVERTISEMENT
FOR SALE BY BID:
1948 GMC Dump Truck. Can be
seen at the City Maintenance shop
on Power House road, Newberry,
S. C.
Bids will be received until 10:00
a.m. August 27, 1965, at which
time they will be opened. Bids
must include a certified check for
the full amount of the bid.
■ The City reserves the right to
reject ariy or all bids. Bids must
be marked on outside of envelope:
“Bid for 1948 GMC Truck.’V
‘ State Bank No. 67-693-531
REPORT OF CONDITION OF
THE BANK Of COMMERCE
OF PROSPERITY, IN THE STATE OF S: C. AT THE CLOSE OF
BUSINESS ON JUNE 29, 1965
ASSETS
Cash, balances with other banks, and cash items in
Process of collection ^ $ 310,264.49
United States Government obligations, direct and
guaranteed 1 l —— f 383,787.25
Obligations of States and political subdivisions 236,428.62
Other bonds, notes, and debentures (including
$245,059.33 securities of Federal agencies and cor
porations not guaranteed by U. S.) 245,059.33
Loans and discounts (including $ overdrafts-— 998,138115
Bank premises owned $17,243.32, furniture and
fixtures $5,920.50 : 23,163.82
Other Assets 8,717.53
TOTAL ASSETS — $2,205,559.19
LIABILITIES
Demand deposits of individuals, partnerships,
and corporations
Time and savings deposits of individuals,
partnerships and corporations
Deposits of United States Government
(including postal savings) ^
Deposits of States and polit
Certified and officers’ c
TOTAL DEPOSITS — $1,980,927.53
(a) Total demand deposits » $1,464,280.92
(b) Total time and savings deposits $ 516,646.61
Other' liabilities
political subdivisions
hecks, ets.
1,345,740.60
416,646.61
71,651.15
141,466.08
5,423.09
38,259.88
TOTAL LIABILITIES $2,019,187.41
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS
Capital
Undivided profits
TOTAL CAPITAL ACCOUNTS
TOTAL LIABILITES & CAPITAL ACCOUNTS-
50,000.00
100,
36,371.
u—:
186,371.78
$2,205,559.19
^ MEMORANDA
Assets pledged or assigned to secure liabilities and for
other purposes (including notes and bills rediscount
ed and securities sold with agreement to repurchase),
(a) Loans as shown above are after deduction of val
uation reserves of !
219,869.91
33,853.38
I, Jacob A. Bowers, President and Cashier, of the above named bank,
do solemnly affirm that this report of condition is true arid correct, to
the best of my knowledge and belief.
JACOB A. BOWERS
Correct —Attest:
RUDOLPH C. BARNES
J. MONROE FULMER
W. G. LYLES
State of South Carolina, County of Newberry, S. S:
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 15th day of July 1965.
ANNIE R. HtJNTER, Notary Public
PATIENTS IN
THE HOSPITAL
Miss Annie Bynum, City
Mrs. Lula Mae Cuthbertson,
Newberry
Mrs. Sue Counts, Kinards
Mrs. Viola Evans, Newberry
Mrs. Elizabeth Graham, City
Mrs. Betty Holmes, City
W. B. Henson, City
Herman Halfacre, City
Master Robert Hall, Whitmire
Joseph Johnson, City
Fred H. Jones, City
James E. Long, City
Mrs. Nettie B. Lester, City
Mrs. Judy Miller, City
Mrs. Eugenia Mayfield, City •<
Adolph Putman, Chapin
Mrs. Annie Plunket, Saluda
Jim Price, City
Holland Ruff, Newberry
Mrs. Nellie Riley, Saluda
Miss Mabel Robertson, Whitmire
Mrs. Betty Jean Smith, City
Mrs. Mary Nell Shealy, City
Mrs. Jennie Stagg, Laurens
Mrs. Phyllis June Slice, Chapin
Mrs. Carrie Slice, Newberry
Mrs. Elizabeth Shealy, Little
Mountain
H. C. Shipman, City
Mrs. Mary Ruth Stockman,
Batesburg
Janice Slice, City
Fred Wier, City
Mrs. Hattie Wesson, City
John C. Wilson, City
John W. Wilson Jr., City
Herman Wright, City
Miss Isabell ‘Brooks, City
Mrs. Claudia Bates, City
Baby Boy Bookman, City
Mrs. Bessie Dawkins, City
Miss Betty Joe Farrow, City
Willie B. Johnson, City
Willie McConnell, Blair
Willie Mack Reeder, City
Mrs. Celestine Suber, City
Mrs. Margaret Suber, Thomas-
ville, N. C.
Miss Delma Jean Suber, Thom-
asville, N. C.
Mrs. Nora Lee Sims, City
Charles Williams, City
Mrs., Cora Lee Wise, Prosperity
TRANSFERS
, Vi • • ; .. . - - v
^Newberry No. 1
Jacob S. Fuhner and Mildred S.
Fulmer, a|bja, Fulmer Building
Supplies, to Raymond Roton and
Nancy Price Roton, one lot and
one building on Glenn street $5.
Henrietta Q. Warren, Varie G.
Kibler, Sarah Ruth G. Baker, Er
nestine G.' Swindell and Evelyn
G. Bishop to William N. Gibson,
one lot a,nd ode building $5.
, Ernest Bt. Gruber, Jr. to Donald
E. Morris and Belle B. Morris, one
lot> and one building i5.
Raymdnd H. Roton to Murray
Lumber Company, one lot and one
building $5.
Franklin ;Somers to Blanche
Bobb Cockreni' one lot and one
building $6.;^. ^
R. E. Summer Sr. to Van Cor-
tei Sanders, four lots on corner of
Pope and Osborne streets $5.
NeV; y No. 1 Outside
Lois S. Pitts to James L. Shep
pard, six acres $5.
Louise Attaway, William At-
taway, Roberta Jackson, George
H. Attaway and Willie Mae Yonn
to W. A. Attaway, one lot and one
building $5 love and affection.
Van C. Sanders to Horace T.
Buffington, Hammond B. Buff
ington and Sherif Buffington, two
lots and two buildings $5.
Silverstreet No. 2
G. T. Epting to Katherine E.
Hawkins and K^liny Hawkinjs, one
lot, $5 love and affection.
Whitmire No. 4 Outside
The Whitmire Development
Corporation of Whitmire to the
Town of Whitmire, 3.15 acres,
$3,750.
Pomaria No. 5
V
H. L. Suber to Carroll A. Pin
ner and Harriett E. Pinner, one
lot, $5 love and affection.
Little Mountain No. 6
Nora E. Myers to Lt. Col.
E. R. Cooper, one lot at Hamm’s
landing* $5.
Prosperity No 7
John D. Pruitt to J. R. Sextion,
one lot $10.
David W. Bowers and Martha
S. Bowers to Roy Dominick, one
lot $5.
THE MARINE
CORPS f
BUILDS MEN! fcSp
Ml YOU* IOCA1 \CcBLJ
«. S. MARINI tactuim
v
i ^
*
r'
H
b '*», 4
ro
- A
1 v r i
.r. jW-v
.'v-
i -e?
u
i lo
instt'h
tr.upt. .
-90 of f te
£
*
«f .m
■oo8 I
- >iMPm
/ . fc .• i - .v j*.. ‘-Y j w-mz
•all-Tradedi
-
•out*
]
More and more, ou?gradua
•are preparin^j$tj%Qj||^^
the “Age of Spe^taiizatioij.” Scientists;
who will specialize in | singlAse§m£rit
of one part 9! r thriconffiIex !
ence. Doctor's who
one particular field of medicine. Lawyers
who will devote therpsftves exclusively
to one brancfe’of the law. Accountants
who will pursue the special problems of
tax legislation;; • j •
The jack-of-all-trades can nq longer
give satisfactoty service if he tries to
cope with all of the problems in any par
ticular field. Specialization has become
almost mandatory as the herizons of
knowledge continue to expand.
Savings and loan associations are spe-
CiaJiSts. They specialize in two fields-^
savings andrhome loans.
Today, savings and loan associations
provide the facilities for 37,000,000
people to save their money with safety,
and profit.
Today, savings and loan associations
make more home loans than all other,
financial institutions combined, over
1,000,000 in 1964 alone.
This specialization provides better
services for you and the people in your
community. If you are planning .to open
a savings account or want a home loan
to fit your individual need, come in and
see us. We are specialists. *
BRANCH
JOHN F. CLAR!
M. O. SUMMER
W. C. HUFFMAN 11
* . :• GC-:
- '• jj
'