The sun. [volume] (Newberry, S.C.) 1937-1972, March 25, 1965, Image 13
m
i
THURSDAY, MARCH 25, 1965
THE NEWBERRY SUN, NEWBERRY, SOUTH CAROLINA
SECTION B—PAGE FTV*
!
THE “SPECTATOR’S” COLUMN
The case of Representative Albert Watson is a very in
teresting one. Mr. Watson was a candidate for Congress in
the Democratic primary and was nominated by the Demo
crats but in the presidential campaign Mr. Watson supported
the Republican candidate. Much ado has been made over
this. Some years ago Adam Clayton Powell of New York, a
Democrat, supported President Eisewhower and he was
never disciplined for that. On the contrary, he became, and
is, Chairman of House Committee on Education. The case
of Mr. Watson appears to be about the same as Adam Clay
ton Powell, but the Democrats in the House have disciplined
Mr. Watson by denying him those rights of seniority which
should run with his number of years of service.
There is an interesting phase of this case of Mr. Watson.
His district voted heavily for the Republican candidate for
presidency. Mr. Watson, as a candidate was seeking election
as a representative in Congress, a national office. He used
the machinery of the Democratic party of South Carolina
more or less for convenience, but the question that occurs
to me is this: as a matter of principle is a Congressman pri
marily obligated to the Democratic party of his State or to
the electors generally?
Since the overwhelming vote of the people of Mr. Watson’s
district was for the Republican candidate, Goldwater, is
Mr. Watson more obligated to go along with his people or
the Democratic machinery of the State?
I am making the observation only because it is a very
interesting case. Mr. Watson supported the presidential
candidate who won the majority vote in Mr. Watson’s dis
trict. Which, then, was the higher obligation on Mr. Wat
son—to run with the Democratic machinery or to support
the choice of the people of his district and of his state ?
Just as a casual observation, the question arises whether
his first obligation was to the Democratic party or to the
people of his district.
of a billion, and beside him the Kennedys with four hundred
million appear to be people of very modest means. But I’ve
just run across something that makes even the Rockefeller
billion like small potatoes. The Ford Foundation, built on
the genius of Henry Ford, had assets last year of nearly 3
billion dollars. I give a short statement of that great foun
dation.
At one time Henry Ford was in trouble with the banks and
some of them put the squeeze on Henry. But the squeeze
didn’t work for Ford called all his dealers together and sold
enough cars to get in the clear. Today,- quite apart from the
Ford factory, the Ford foundation is a big stockholder in
some of the biggest banks in New York as well as in other
cities. I’ve just read of the holdings of Ford in the American
Express company, The Bank of America, First National
Bank of Chicago, Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. and a score
of other concerns.
So Henry Ford, the machinist, who seemed to be without
ambition or prospects when he was thirty five years old, has
left the greatest fortune credited to any American.
“All buildings, old and new, generally have their upper
floor windows cleaned monthly, their ground floor windows
weekly and doors and entrances daily. But the new style
buildings have about threee times as much glass surface to
be cleaned per story as the older ones. In addition, the alum
inum sections of their exteriors need to be cleaned far more
often than masonry facades. Otherwise, says the head of a
window washing company, they ‘look terrible, all dirty and
pitted’.
On many big new buildings the window cleaner’s job is
never done. It takes eight men a month to clean the seven
acres of glass on the 60-story Chase Manhattan bank, a
crystal pillar amidst the granite canyons of Wall Street. By
the end of the month, when the last grime has been wiped
from the last of the 8,800windows, it’s time to start again.
The window cleaning bill for such a building runs about
$6000 a month.
SENATOR 1
STROA#
HURMOND
Reports
PEOPLE
Everyone who reads the newspapers has read of the
great plans of the power companies for greater development
of our State. A mammoth project of seven hundred million
dollars for developments in the Piedmont of South Carolina
are in addition to two other plans for the development of
coastal and centra 1 Carolina. Not only had Duke planned
great things but the South Carolina Electric and Gas Co.
and the Carolina Light and Power Co. are also preparing
vast plans for development. Let us get in on the ground floor
and enjoy prosperity with other states.
U •
‘Jay Gould got plenty of money.” As a boy I heard that
sung around and today we may remember Jay Gould and his
fortune. As a matter of fact I had a suite in the Fine Building
that Miss Helen Miller Gould gave to New York University.
Since the days of Jay Gould we’ve had many men of mil
lions—the Vanderbilts, the Morgans and scores of others.
We have been looking upon John D. Rockefeller as the man
Everybody is interested in Atomic energy. Here is what
they have to say about it.
“Atomic energy, uncontested villian of the last two dec
ades, may be trading in its mustache and cape for a suit of
shining armor, according to recent press resports.
There appears to be mounting evidence th some of the
long-hoped-for peacetime applications of atomic power may
be nearing practicality.
Nuclear-powered electric power plants ar e planned or
under construction in the United States, Japan, Great Brit
ain, Western Europe—even in the so-called “backward’ na
tions such as India.
D-salted sea water may soon become an actuality to aug
ment the world’s dangerously diminishing fresh water sup
ply, thanks to the high heat possible with nuclear energy.
Experimental costs have already dropped from $4.00 per
thousand gallons 12 years ago to about a dollar today; when
the cost reaches 60c, desalinization will be economically feas
ible for many critically water-hort areas. One study indi-
ible a billion gallon-a-day plant could be producing water in
Southern California for only about 30c per thousand gallons
in another decade or so.
The split-personality atom is already at peacetime work on
and under the sea—as power for shipping, in weather sta
tions and navigational aids; there’s even one operational
atomic-powered lighthouse.
And in the long-range, space-race, nuclear energy looks
like the winning power, hands down. Light in weight, and
readily adaptable to electric propulsion, the atom appears to
be man’s most promising propellant to the outer reaches.”
Are You
Listening?
If you travel around the United States you may find many
things strike your attention. Do you know that the wash
ing of windows may be a great business. Well, in New York
City the Chase Bank employs eight men a month to clean,
their windows. .
By EARL WILSON
Some time ago a man allowed himself to be hypnotized
and then put to bed in the showroom window of a downtown
furniture store. There he slept for an entire weekend. This
was done as a publicity stunt for a mattress firm and the
man never was aware of how many people there were to ob
serve him in his sleep. He became the laughing stock of the
entire community for some of his antics during this time
of public sleeping.
America could very well be compared with the “sleeping
beauty” of our story. Some of the greatest minds that we
have in our nation today are being hypnotized. Many of our
politicians, our school administrators, and church men are
being held in the hypnotic spell of thinking that it doesn’t
really matter how we treat God. By their words and their
actions they are leading this nation of ours into the very pit
of destruction. v
The Bible tells the story of a man who went by the field
of the lazy and sleepy man and it was all grown over with
thorns and the stone walls were broken down. When fruit
is surrounded by thorns it will not be very delicious, but
when the wall of protection is broken down the enemy will
come in and rob the fruit from the owner. The writer of
this story goes on to say that he looked upon this sight and
learned a lesson. “Yet a little sleep, a little slumber, a little
folding of the hands to sleep; so shall thy poverty come as
one that travaileth; and thy want as an armed man.” Prov
erbs 24:30-34. The Bible says, “Better is little with the fear
of the Lord than great treasure and trouble therewith.”
Are you listening?
The Right to Work
ONE OF THE most funda
mental freedoms guaranteed to
every American is the right to
work for a living without being
coerced to join a labor union.
This right is protected by the
1st. 5th, and 9th Amendments
to the U S. Constitution Even
t'-'e 14th Amendment, which w-as
never legally ratified but is cited
today as the basis for most lib
eral expansions of the Constitu-
t : on. nrovides for this protec
tion. However, this is one inter
pretation of the 14th Amend
ment which seems to escape
Cmse who desire compulsory
,,nanism
EVEN THE Universal Peclar-
*t ; "n of Human RigMs. adopted
hv the U.N General Assembly
ip recognises the right to
work But again, although lib
eral® recognise the IT.N declara
tions the law of our land,
thev fail to perceive the clear
of this IT.N. document
stat 5 ne that "Everyone has the
rieM to work . .**
SUCH IS THE hypocrisy of
those union boesea who seek the
easiest course to arbitrary con
trol of all employeea.
IN 1947, the Congress official
ly recognized the right to work
and the importance of Tohm-
tary unionism over compulsory
unionism. With the help of then-
Senator Lyndon B. Johnson, Sen
ator Robert Taft wrote into law
Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hart-
ley Act. This section gave to
States the decision to approve
or disapprove laws guaranteeing
the right to work.
SINCE THAT TIME, 19 states,
including South Carolina, have
approved right to work laws.
These States have not only pro
tected the basic freedom of em
ployees to elect or decline to
join a union, but they nave also
improved their industrial de
velopment, wages, and general
progress. Department of Labor
reports from 1953-1963 show
that jobs in right to work States
increased by 23.2% as compared
to 9.9% in non-right to work
States; per capita personal in
come increased by 43.0% in
right to work States aa com
pared to 34.7% in non-right to
work States; and capital expend
itures in right to work States
increased by 38.3% as compared
to 11.6% in non-right to work
States.
THE SAME Lyndon B. John
son. who supported Section 14
(b) in 1947 but who is now
Presidenl and obligated to the
union bosses, is asking Congress
to repeal Section 14(b). The
President seeks to give the false
impression that right to work
laws cause labor-management
difficulties an l are anti-union
IN SOUTH CAROLINA we
! have had virtually no problems
caused by our right to work
law In fact, the law has stimu
lated progress and has brought
stability *
FORMER GOVERNOR Ernest
F Rollings of South Carolina
has attributed our State's “un-
' usual success in industrial de
velopment” to “our strong Right
to Work Law.” Every Sout v »
Carolina Governor in recer *;
years has taken the same po
sition.
CERTAINLY every person
should be permitteo to Join a
union if he wishes to do so. I
j would oppose any law denying
anyone this right. Likewise, I
would oppose any law compel
ling a pei’son to join a union.
Just because 35% of the Amer
ican public do not belong to
churches bat receive some ben
efits from the work of churches,
there can be no justification for
forcing these people to join the
church.
THE FOUNDER of the
American Federation of Labor,
the late Samuel Gompers, gave
the beet case for right to work
laws in his 1925 autobiography
when he stated: *1 held and
hold that if a union expels •
member and he is deprived of
his livelihood, in theory or in
fact, in so far as he and his
dependents are concerned, K is
capita] punishment . . . There
may be here and there a worker
who for certain reasons unex
plainable to ue does not join n
union of labor. This is hie right
no matter how morally wrong
he may be. It is hie legal right
and no one can or dare question
hie exercise of that legal right.*
Sincerely,
WA
n
Congratulations to Our EGG INDUSTRY!
"For a real Treat and added Appeal-use Newberry County Eggs with Every Meal”
Use of Newberry County produced
eggs not only provides treat and ap
peal —but provides a source of income
to spark the prosperity of our com
munity.
USE MORE NEWBERRY COUNTY
EGGS!
Egg production in Newberry Comity
increased 700% in the 10-year period
between 1954 and 1963 — due to the
foresight, initiative and hard work of
our Newberry County Poultry and Egg
Producers and Distributors. They de
serve our support!
••r;
mm
Collier Neel is one of producers supplying Southern
Breakfast Eggs, Inc. He is shown in one of his lay
ing houses gathering some of 4,500 eggs daily.
COU NTY
NEWBERRY
V.,-
JESSE FRANK HAWKINS, Senator
D. P. FOLK, Representative
Mi