The sun. [volume] (Newberry, S.C.) 1937-1972, August 06, 1964, Image 2
PAGE 2
THE NEWBERRY SUN, NEWBERRY, SOUTH CAROLINA
THURSDAY, AUGUST 6, 1964
>Utt
1218 College St., Newberry, S. C. 29108
PUBLISHED EVERY THURSDAY
O. F. Armfield, Jr., Owner
Second-Class Postage Paid at Newberry, South
Carolina.
SUBSCRIPTION RATES: $2.00 per year in ad
vance :Six Months $1.25.
1 ARE YOU
LISTENING?
• ••••••••I
Dean Manion
Wk
THE
MANION
FORUM
THE TIME HAS COME
\ for us to take a long, hard
| look at what has happened
► to the United States Sup-
| reme Court. Throughout
► our history every president
[ of the United States has
► been widely and bitte.
[ criticized whenever his ci-
► ficial judgment appeared
\ to be bad. Congress func-
► tions under a sustained
1 barrage of criticism from
the press, the pulpit, and the general public. : The
same is true of those who manage all branches of our state
and local governments.
But for some reason, all judgments of the United
States Supreme Court are now quite generally re
garded as sacred, even when these judgments re
quire radical, unpopular departures from our his
toric and accepted way of life.
The current impression that a Supreme Court decision
proclaims the law of the land for the entire country is a
popular delusion. In legal theory, a court decision settles
merely the particular problems of the parties before the
court. No single Supreme Court decision is or can become
“the low of the land.” The basic law of the land is the Cons
titution itself. When Congress passes a law pursuant to
the provisions of the Constitution, that statute likewise be
comes the law of the land. Laws passed by Congress look
to future events, while a Supreme Court judgment always
looks backward and considers specific acts already performed
by the parties to the litigation.
It is not the function of the Court nor is it within the
Court’s constitutional power, tor declare policies for future
action. Nevertheless, for more than ten years our Supreme
Court has been making such declarations. To this extent
it has been flagrantly and unconstitutionally misappropria
ting the legislative functions of Congress and of state leg
islatures.
It has been delegating the enforcement of this judicial
legislation to subordinate Federal courts with authority to
rule by decree over designated subjects. In the process,
the court has usurped the constitutional function of Congress
and all but paralyzed the legislative power of the several
states.
In this ten-year period, the Supreme Court has re
written Federal laws, made new Federal regulations,
and wiped out important segments of the States'
law-making power altogether.
The consequences of this seizure of unconstitutional power
are serious because it is the Supreme Court itself which is
in violation of the law, and there is no higher tribunal to
which its unconstitutional usurpations of power may be
appealed and nullified.
The only remedy is for Congress to STRIP THIS ARRO
GANT, INCOMPETENT SUPREME COURT of its appel
late jurisdiction—of its power to hear cases appealed to it
from lower courts. This Congress has the express constitu
tional power to do and the present DANGEROUS DIRECT
ION of the Supreme Court makes it a SWORN DUTY of
Congress to exercise that power NOW!
The disobedience in the garden
of Eden shortly after the creation
of all things was the first rebel
lion against authority. Since that
time man has consistently been a
rebel.
We have never been given the
right to do as we choose, but we
are always on the alert as to how
we might break a law and get
away with it. This is in our minds
unconsciously whenever we refuse
to come tc a halt at a “STOP”
sign. We resent being told what
to do. This rebellion is a part of
the thinking of the peison who
deliberately commits adultry with
another’s mate. He despises a God
that w r ould dare tell him that he
should not do this.
This* rebellion is found even
in the pleasures of life. The golfer
will throw his ball out of the
j rough without penalizing himself
j because he feels that he is bigger
than the rules- A football player
will hit his opponent with his
fist while in a pile-up simply be
cause he wants the freedom to do
so. Church members deliberately
stay away from church because
they are resentful of the com
mandment that says, “Thou shalt
have no other gods before me.”
The right to do as we choose is
not the freedom for which we are
crying so much today. True free-
I dom is to know that we are free
as long as we live by the rules;
f but that we will be punished when
we rebel against those rules. Free-
| dom is the right to do “right
i things” without fear, but to ex-
PATIENTS IN
THE HOSPITAL
Willie P. Amick, Little Moun
tain
Baby Girl Triplets, Joanna
Mrs. Leila Bickley, Chapin
Mrs. Victoria Bradley, City
Mrs. Edith Boland, City
Lewis Chapman, City
Mrs. Annie S. Chappell, City
Mrs. Mary Etta Coppock, City
M rs. Janie Dawkins, City
Mrs. Mary Ernestine Goff and
girl, Gilbert
J. H. Gilliam, City
Mrs. Doris H. Gilliam, City
Mrs Elizabeth Huffman, City
Mrs. Eva L. Halfacre, City
Mrs. Hilda Howard, City
Campbell J. Jackson, City
Mrs. Mary Kirkland, Saluda
Lloyd Chapman Laymon, City
Mrs. Loree Lunceford, City
Miss Bessie Long, Prosperity
John Henry Lipford, City
Mrs. Faye V. Long, City
Mrs. Dorothy N. Livingston,
City
Mrs. Sallie McCartha, City
Mrs. Sybil V. Meeks, City
Mrs. Ellie Prince Moore, Lees-
ville
Mrs. Sonja Morris, City
Mrs. Judy B. Moore, Prosperity
Miss Annette (Wendy) Morris,
Johnston
Mrs. Anna Mae Pappas, City
Mrs. Docia Rankin, Prosperity
Joseph Ruff, Pomaria
Mrs. Margaret Sheppard, City
Mrs. Claudia Suber, City
Mrs. Claire Sligh, City
Mrs. Mabel Slaton, City
Mrs. Maggie Senn, City
Frank Scarborough, City
Mrs. Emmie Shealy, City
Mrs. Carrie Sanford, City
Arthur P. Werts, City
pect punishment when we break
the law.
The Bible says, “O Lord, I know
that the way of man is not in
himself; it is not in man that
walketh to direct his own steps.
O Lord, correct me, but with judg
ment: not in thine anger, lest
thou bring me to nothing.”
Are you listening?
Looking A. head
...by Dr. G«org« S. Benson
PRESIDENT—NATIONAL
EDUCATION PROGRAM
Soarcy, Arkema*
The High Court Rides
Again
No one denies that the
U. S. Supreme Court is
rapidly finding it way into
the social, political, and ec
onomical affairs of Ameri-
•an citizens in a manner that has increasing impact. This
apparent intention to reach decisions in touchy, controver
sial areas in a “creative” manner rather than necessarily
constitutionally should eventually bring limitations upon the
•court in order to keep the Court itself from functioning in
an unconstitutional way.
' UNQUESTIONABLY, this new era of bold initia
tive on the part of the Court has arrived partly be
cause of failure by the states (and people and organ
izations within them) to accept responsibility. At
least, some feel that Supreme Court interest in civil
rights problems came because the states and local
communities had not made the progress that might
have been expected. Likewise, in the legislative ap-
T portionment decision, this was an area in which the
states were doing very little to correct abuses.
Dangers To Face
“One man, one vote” may sound like a good, basic princi
ple of democratic government. Inequities in representation
have needed correction, to be sure. But government by the
people will not be achieved merely because everybody has
equal representation. A new absoluteism could allow new
power alignments to develop in the nation's urban centers
to a degree that will make our states more subservient to
the federal government than ever before. If this happens,
the individual American will be worse off than he was.
The American system has somehow diffused its power
in attaining protection for both majority and minority, and
has provided for most of the necessary adjustments between
the diverse elements and interests in the society. But there
may be dangers ahead. If we have at times had to fear the
tyranny of the few, we should be aware that tyranny of the
mass might be even worse. What new boss-systems in city-
states, for example, have we in our future? Will we elect U.
S. Senators by cities? Will urban power produce a height
ened federal centralization?
Freedom To Manage
Government partiality to labor organizations has
already become characteristic of the new political
alignments. Congress, federal boards, the presi
dent, and the federal courts have all become eager
to err on the side of labor. If the Supreme Court
continues to follow the present trend, decisions thru
the next few years may seem to strengthen the
mass. But they will surely weaken the liberties
and freedoms of individuals and institutions. This
fall the Court will hear a case in which a California
company may be told whether or not it has free
dom to manage its own affairs.
Up through National Labor Relations Board and U. S.
, Court of Appeals rulings favoring the United Steelworkers,
the Fibreboard Corp. has been told that it cannot make de
cisions about its business that may result in loss of jobs.
This is based in federal law that requires bargaining “with
respect to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of
employment.” In brief, the company had decided after
studying maintenance costs that it would contract the work
out to another firm at an annual saving of $225,000. The
move cost 75 employees their jobs and the company a charge
of unfair labor practices.
Mythology of Change
If the Supreme Court should find for the union, then a
great many business decisions that companies make will
have to be processed through bargaining with their unions.
In that case, the company points out, “the pace at which an
employer does business, or goes out of business, will be
limited to the pace set in bargaining by the union or unions
with which he deals.”
The fact that this decision has to be made by the high
court suggests a woeful misunderstanding of the American
pattern of individual responsibility and freedom of decision.
Implicit in many of the court’s recent majority decisions
is the view that the nation is not moving fast enough in
accepting and implementing changes. In this the Court be
comes not only a harbinger of change, but arbiter and inno
vator as well. Public dissatisfaction with the Court may
one day reach the point of Constitutional change, to prevent
decisions proscribing or replacing legislation. When the
Court becomes political (or devoted to special interests or
ideologies), then the whole judiciary falls to a very low ebb.
WE NEED STRICT OBSERVANCE of the Constitution—
not mystical obeisence to the “change” mythology.
PROPERTY
TRANSFERS
Newberry No. 1
O. F. Armfield and W. F. Wells
to Roberta S. Coleman and Veda
Mae Shelton, one lot and one
building in Lincoln Court, $5.00.
Harold O. Cook to W\ Fulmer
W’ells, one lot on corner Reid and
Fulmer Streets, $5.00.
Carl Everette Epting and Linda
Monroe Epting to Harry Sessoms
and Anne Sessoms, one lot and one
building on Hilicrest and Henry
Ave., $5.00.
Haynie McGraw, Eltas MeGraw
Christie and H. B. McGraw, two
lots and two buildings, 2401 Main
street and 1220 Kinard street,
$5.00.
Lewis Moore Lipscomb to Mar
garet S. Lipscomb, one lot and
one building on Chapman street,
$5.00 love and affection.
Guy V. Whitener Jr. and Annie
WTlson Whitener to J. Ray Hol
liday, one lot on Henry Avenue,
$100.00.
Newberry No. 1 Outside
Julette M. Wise to James Clark
! and Grace Clark, one lot on Wise
street, $200.00.
Sarah W. Mills to Celia E. Dod-
gen, one lot and one building on
First street, $2227.21 and assump
tion of a mortgage.
Lillie Bell Caldwell to Bessie
Lee Sligh, one lot and one build
ing corner of Vincent and Gray
streets, $1200.
Whitmire No. 4 Outside
Frank H. Ward, Probate Judge,
to Newberry Federal Savings and
Loan Association, one lot and one
building, $4,4665.35.
Little Mountain No. 6
L. K. Counts, John 6. Counts,
George E. Counts, Clarence A.
Counts, Walter H. Counts, Wm. F.
Counts, Sara C. Hazel and Estelle
C. Singley to Marion Ruff, 25
acres, $2500.
D. H. Hamm Sr. to Roy Edgar
Burbage, one lot, $5.00.
Marie Cannon to Mary Lou
Tobe, 1.8 acres, $5.00.
Melvin H. Richardson to F. R.
Rice, one lot, $5.00.
South Carolina Electric and Gas
Company to Helen E. Wdlson, one
lot, $1.00.
J. L. Koon to Allen F. Harmon,
one lot, $5.00.
Virgil L. Cotney to Jesse R.
Brown, one lot, $5.00.
O. F. Armfield Sr. to Lester M.
Vaughn, one lot, $5.00.
L E. Long to The Town of
Prosperity, one lot, $1.00.
Quincy Williams, City
Mrs. Sarah Wessinger, City
Mrs. Christia Youngblood, City
Mrs. LeVivian Adams and boy,
Batesburg
Olin Boozer, Silverstreet
A. J. Burton, City
Rev. Porterfield Crump,Silver-
street
Allen Caughman, Chapin
Louis John Dawkins, Sr., Whit
mire
Willie Dawkins, City
Baby Girls Hare twins, City
Mrs. Lucinda Hair, Prosperity
Bluford Hunter, City
Mrs. Carrie A. Lyles, City
Mrs. Hattie Teague Quiller,
City
Mrs. Rhoudina Tobe and boy,
Little Mountain
Andrew Thomas, City
Mrs. Maggie Wise, Prosperity
Mrs. Joan Moon Wise, Prosper
ity
Wade Wells, City
Wjw&m
A NEW ROOF
improvements you want
with a
home improvement
loan from ®O0
A den . • a patio .. a new roof • • o fence . *
another bath . . an air-conditioning system • •
a new heating system .. whatever your house
needs . . get it with
o home improvement loan from SCN • •
it's quick and easy!
WP
FAINTING
m
ANOTHER ROOM
A PAVED DRIVEWAY
jSince
1834
LINA NATIONAL
Member Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Reuth fob Coetutbodu
THERE'S AN SCN OFFICE NEAR YOU
FARM £
N OT E S lluISrs:
^5 ' ■ •••in iiin<..iiu
Newberry County Has
Been Invaded
That is about what it amounts
to as the insects are building up.
All farmers are urged to check
their pastui^. hay and forage
crops for Army worms.
There are two kinds of these
little monsters. One is the Fall
army worm, which is about 1 1-2
inches in length but can more eas
ily be identified by the inverted
^ on their head. The fall army
worm is known mainly as an en
emy of growing corn, but it feeds
on many other cultivated crops
and wild plants as well. The eggs
are laid at night on grass or other
plants and hatch out in about five
days. The young larvae feed first
near the ground; becomes full
grown in 20 days. After the
moths emerge they often fly many
miles before the female lays eggs.
The true Army worm is just a
little longer about two inches in
length and not quite as big around
with pronounced pinacles or hair
like projections on its back.
The fall army worm and true
army worm may be controlled on
grasses with either Sevin spray
containing 1-1 1- pounds active
material per acre or dusted at the
same rate of 1-1 1-2 pounds active
material per acre.
The insecticide may be applied
up to the day of harvest for
grazed pastures. But noting a tol
erance of 100 parts per million
has been established on grass and
grass hay.
For corn that will be used for
silage, two pounds active Sevin
dust of wettable powder per acre.
Do not cut or harvest for feed
until seven days after applica
tion.
These invaders—army worms—
have been reported in widely scat
tered sections of the county, so
look out—you may have them in
your fields.
Cotton
For the past month the weather
has been most ideal for a build up
of cotton insects. In some fields
counts as high as 46 per cent have
been made. Cotton in some fields
is very rank; however, most cot-
is young for this time of year and
insecticides should be continued to
be applied until insects are under
control and the last bolls you ex
pect to harvest are hard.
If high hay sprayers and high
mounted dusters can not get in
the field, farmers may consider
the feasibility of having the crops
dusted by airplane. If this is true
in your case, get in touch with the
fellows at the Newberry airport.
Boll worm can be controlled
with DDT or SEVIN.
FARM AND HOME WEEK
IS AUGUST 26th
—The Animal Science department
of Clemson University will devote
Wednesday, August 26, of Farm
and Home week to beef cattle
programs.
Topics to be discussed include:
pasture management; wintering
the brood herd; the pros and cons
of artificial breeding of beef cat
tle; systems of feeding cattle; cow
identification; wintering stocker
cattle; and diagnosing pregnancy
in beef cattle.
In addition to the staff members
of the Animal Science, Agronomy
and Dairy Science departments ap
pearing on the program, other par
ticipants will be Max Drake, Noba,
Inc., Tiffin, Ohio; H. T. Warner,
livestock producer, Greenwood;
Edwin Smith, livestock producer,
Greer; and Carl 1’Orange, Delau-
lane, Virginia.
The Annual banquet for the
South Carolina Cattlemen’s Asso
ciation will be held at 7:30 p. m.
Wednesday night at the Clemson
house. Carl 1’Orange, will be the
banquet speaker.
MARRIAGES
Moffett Gordon Minick, Route
4, Newberry and Carolyn Alliene
Kibler, Route 2, Newberry, were
married on July 26th at Prosperity
by Rev. William H. Link.
Roland lewis Hawkins and
Donna Sue Davis of Newberry,
were married at Newberry on July
22 by Rev. John A. Sanders.
Buren McKinley Mitchell and
Cheryl Lynn Wesson, were mar
ried by Rev. Michael B. Fryga at
Newberry on July 28th.
James William Rikard of Bates
burg and Magdaline Long Living
ston of Pomaria, were married at
Pomaria on July 31 by Rev. Le-
grande Adams.
tper
fAnmr
OP YOU It
* AVI NOS
INSURED
^§rcoss§«
Protection!
That is the paramount factor in saving money.
Then, you want a good rate of return. Newberry Fed
eral offers both. Your Savings are Insured to $10,000
by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corpora
tion, Washington, D. C., and your rate of return on
savings is
PER
ANNUM
NEWBERRY
• PHONE 1549 • 1119.21 BOYCE ST.
compounded semi-annually.
All new savings accounts and additions to present
accounts received by August 10th, earn Dividends from
August 1st.
Are YOU saving regularly for future security?
BRANCH OFFICE—BATESBURG, S. C.
'MW
lAvnros 'aatz> Loan Association
J. F. CLARKSON
M. O. SUMMER
4 ****«Oia.»a*. BTWMMYt
DIRECTORS
G. K. DOMINICK
J. K. WILLINGHAM
BRANCH OFFICE —Baiesburg, S. C.
r»Mmmr, m. ©J
E. a PURCELL I
W. C HUFFMAN
m)