The sun. [volume] (Newberry, S.C.) 1937-1972, April 25, 1963, Image 2

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

Page Two THE NEWBERRY SUN. NEWBERRY. SOUTH CAROLINA THURSDAY. APRIL 25. 1963 1218 College Street, Newberry, S. C./ PUBLISHED EVERY THURSDAY O. F. Armfield, Jr., Owner Second-Class Postage Paid at Newberry, South Carolina. SUBSCRIPTION RATES: $2.00 per year in ad vance :Six Months $1.25. THE “SPECTATOR’S” COLUMN Tom Anderson seems to think and speak clearly. I quote one sentence from a recent editorial by Tom in Farm and Ranch. “Unless we get rid of our Ken nedy’s, Stevensons, Rostows, and Schlesingers, who believe the masses are asses, an end to our nationhood and our freedom is inevitable”. Yea, verily, Tom, you are eminently right, I think. When Walter Regnery writes or talks he gives us the benefit of sound advice based on actual knowledge of conditions and pros pects. In a luminous exposition in The Joanna Way, discussing “Who profits when a Union takes over?: “Joanna Cotton Mills company has, of its own accord, instituted policies to insure fairness in deal ings with its employees, without need for union bargaining. The Seniority policy, the * Leave-of- Absence procedures, the Sugges tion-Awards system, the Griev ance procedures—these are a few of the things that unions usually emphasize and which Joanna has voluntarily put into effect. Our open-door policy permits any em ployee to discuss his problems at first-hand without going through complicated union channels. We believe that that is the best way. Joanna Cotton Mills company has enjoyed splendid relationships with its employees through the years. You may remember that we pioneered in introducing many benefits for our employees. By managing our. own affairs we have been able to pay good wages, to furnish job security to our em ployees, to offer many fringe ben efits. In the highly unionized north, however, many mills have been forced out of business,'their buildings now idle, their employ ees seeking work elsewhesre-^-and the government . kicking around the problem of depressed areas. We tell you frankly how we feel. We like the mutual coopera tion and understanding /between management and. employees in di rect dealings. Wp*.value our em ployees; we wantyjfco’offer them every possible benefit and job se curity without h union ■’ interfer ence. We feel that we can do more for the benefit of' all of us with out union meddling, without our employees’ sacrificing to pay un ion dues, fees, ets., and being ham pered by union restrictions. In our opinion, when a union meddles, we all lose. We urge each employee to give serious thought to the union's plans to ‘go get ’em down South’ —their money, their political of ficer, their right to individual, free decisions and action. We don’t believe our Southern employees will be so easily ‘got‘ ”. A man speaks who uses few words; makes few off-hand re marks, but ■who deeply feels his obligation and who never fails to do all that he can for the splen did community of Joanna which is a fellowship of fine * people, from Mr. Regnery down .to the An Assessment on Cuba THIS WEEK MARKS the pas sage of six months since the October “crisis” over Soviet es tablishment of a military base in Cuba. It is now possible to assess, at least partially, the results of Soviet and U. S. ac tions, and the relative gains and losses in the continuing strug gle between communism and THROUGH PUBLIC PRO JECTION of a firm and resolute stance against the communists implicit in U. S. demands for removal of Soviet strategic mis siles and IL-28 bombers from Cuba, the U. S. gained renewed respect and prestige in all the non-communist world. Since Oc tober, 1962, this new respect for the U. S. has considerably di minished, largely because the U. S. has continued to tolerate a strong Soviet military base in Cuba, and because some suspect that a “trade” may have ac counted for U. S. withdrawal of THOR and JUPITER mis siles from Turkey and Italy. On balance, U. S. prestige may be somewhat higher now than be fore the October “crisis”, but the net increase is small, at best, and the trend in U. S. prestige is downward. THE SOVIETS, whether they actually withdrew any of their ballistic missiles or not, gave the appearance of so doing and appeared to “back down.” There by, the Soviets tarnished their hard-sought image of “invinci bility.” The continuing mainte nance of the Soviet military base in Cuba, however, now causes many to wonder whether the apparent Soviet backdown was just the prescribed “one step backward following two steps forward”; for the Soviets now appear to have come out of the Cuban “crisis” with a secure base in the Western Hemisphere. PRIOR TO OCTOBER, 1962, U. S. policy sought the estab lishment in Cuba of what Cu bans call “fidelisimo without Fidel.” This policy supported those who wanted to establish in Cuba a Tito-type government. With Cuba at the mercy of Soviet military forces, however, chances of a legitimate revolu tion against the Castro regime are non-existent. The free world will never believe that anyone who succeeded Castro in a Cuba occupied by the Soviet military was not approved by the Soviets. FROM A PRACTICAL stand point, we now have no policy on Cuba. Our announced policy is to work toward withdrawal of Soviet forces aad a democratic govenuBCBt ia Cuba. However, our policy predaleis all steps which have any likelihood of bringing either of these situa tions to pass, because of our paralyzing fear of the risk of nuclear war. ' 1 IN LATIN AMERICA, U. S. acceptance of the eoftummist subjugation of Cuba, and Soviet use of it as a military and sub versive base of operations, has a tragic psychological effect. Cuba is being cited in Red propaganda as proof that the U. S. wiF tolerate communist regimes hi Latin America and can successfully be defied under protection of Soviet military the’ SOVIET GOAL is to isolate the U. S. and progress is being made toward this end at an alarming pace. U. S. pol icy to support governments in Latin America of the “non-com munist revolutionary left” with Alliance for Progress funds are based on the belief that eco nomic factors will determine the outcome. Such long range pro grams founded on the falla cious theory of economic de- termipism of history have little or no retarding effect on the drives of the communist polit ical activists, especially since the U. S. gives favored treat ment to Latin American govern ments of the far ty&i such as that of Brazil, wMler doing little to help such hard pressed anti communist regrimed as tL se in Nicaragua and Gdatema'.i. ; NOTHING LES$ THAN a firm and resolute policy to rid Cuba of Soviet military forces and communism can rectify the sit- - nation. This policy .would re quire the following steps by the U. S.: / . ^ 1. Demand removal of all Soviet forces in Cuba—to be confirmed by on-site inspections —and if it is not done forth with, break diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union. 2. If severing diplomatic re lations with the Soviet Union does not get Soviet forces out, then re-impose an air and naval blockade of Cuba. 3. In the unlikely event that these steps do not accomplish removal of Soviet forces, direct military action, in concert with other American States, should be taken as a last resort. ONCE SOVIET FORCES are withdrawn, support should be given to Cubans Who Will at tempt to restore-* freedom ih Cuba, for when Sonet military forces are withdrifcrn, Castro and his Cuban compile ter rorists will not be ^bfe tp hang on for long, J . * ” :W.* humblest man or boy in the town. Joanna is more than a mill or industrial enterprise; it is a liv ing monument to the Regnerys and to those splendid men and women who have made it such a happy place to live and work. When I observe the ease and facility with which our State leg islature appropriates the taxpay ers’ money for a whole multitude of tax-consumers, formerly known as tax-eaters, I wonder how many legislators ever organized and operated a business enterprise. Unless one has delved and div ed, sweated and bled, to make a payroll, pay all the licenses, taxes etc and a score of other items making up the overhead of a busi ness, he can have no idea of the strain, struggle, and stress of op erating a business. I still lament the failure of some of us to revive and reinvig orate a tax-payers League. I don’t mean a service organization such as a Chamber of Commerce, a Merchants’ Association, or any other such organization which renders many helpful services, but is not by its nature an organiza tion of fighters, of men and wo men resolved to speak for the taxpayers and equally resolved to carry on a vigorous campaign, having in mind that next year we shall have men soliciting our vote. If anyone takes this lightly I re fer him to 1932-19G3. Our Legislature is mild when compared with the Congress of the United States. At times I wonder at the lack of sober think ing in Washington. I have no ref erence to insobriety from “drink,” but to a sort of general and per vasive hallucination which thinks that money drops from the skies or pushes up through the ground. The truth is that men who never had ten thousand dollars in all their days just blithely appro priate billions, utterly unable to grasp or imagine a billion dollars —it is JUST WORDS! So one-sided have we become that we don’t think of those who make possible our great enter prises. Some weeks ago I cited a small steel company to show what it costs them to operate. Just a small concern, mark you, not a mam- oth concern such as U. S. Steel Here we are: Cost of raw materials and services $48,826,740 Pay roll 31,283,116 Employee benefits 8,313,726 Depreciation and rental of facilities 4,366,327 Interest paid 779,360 Retained for \re-invest- ment, replacements 2,033,048 Now we come to the milk in the cocoanut: % V Taxes paid 4,608,102 Paid to owners 1,240,106 Even if the company had not re tained $2,033,048 for replacements of worn out machinery etc., the total, over/ and above actual ob ligatory requirements, would have been for the owners $3,273,154, compared with taxes $4,508,102. You hear a lot about the wick edness of profits, well what say you of this caser the owners re ceived $1,240,106 and were enti tled to a total of $3,273,154, if they had been like anautomobile owner who never buys a new tire. And the taxes were $4,508,102. That is what I can’t understand about business which operates competitively and pays no taxes! I read recently a statement that brings vividly to our minds just what the tax burden amounts to. A man who knows exactly what he is talking about said: The Electric co-ops pay a total of $96,000 a year in taxes, but the private power companies would pay more than three million in taxes on the same volume of busi ness reported by the coops. I was surprised to learn about the $96,000 because County Treas urers reported that the co-ops paid no school taxes except in several counties and the taxes paid didn’t amount to a row of pins! Now our legislature tells the people of the State that the tax bill will be $212,000,000 (two hun dred twelve million dlolars) and increases will be included for the teachers! How much of that bill will be paid by the Co-ops ? I ask you. It is an anomaly, or worse, that we face the taxpayers of the State with a stupendous burden, increasing year by year, and fos ter and pamper one set of citizens while increasing the burden on others. This is the land of the free and the home of the brave,— but today that seems to mean that we are free to ask for fav ors, using political pull and polit ical pressure and political threats and fears, if we are bold enough to persevere. So now you see how the great spirits of our early days have been traduced; we are still the land of the free and the home of the brave for all favors at the expense of our neighbors who pay the taxes, which of course, means that they pay our debt, too. I quote a news report from the News and Courier of Charleston: ^ “Fuel to drive the Southeast’s first nuclear power plant has been loaded, the Carolina-Virginia Nuclear Power Associates said recently. The fuel supply consists of 200, 000 pellets of enriched uranium which were eased into position deep within a steel and concrete shielded cavity on a hill site at Parr. The last of 72 fuel ele ments was due to go into place by midnight. Soon, these pellets will be bom barded with neutrons to start the chain reaction of fission process, which will create heat to convert water to steam to turn a nearby turbine generator. Louis V. Sutton, president of the Carolinas-Virginia Nuclear Power Associates, which built the plant in cooperation with the Atomic Energy Commission, said fueling and start-up will repre sent the moment of fulfillment in a six-year program by the four member companies of CVNPA. A “DREAM” PLAN AT AGE 65- JUST GET IN THE CAR AND GO t* A FTER some 40 years with ^ one employer I retired last December the a^e of 63. My wife is five year* younger. We have no heirs. * ' “My monthly income is a com fortable 6n&; and 1 have made arrangements’for my wife to have an adequate income should I die first. I have life insurance, a house and car, and owe nobody. “My wife and I have no close friends here. We no longer care to live here. “We are thinking of selling our bouse and all the furnishings. This will bring our total savings close to $35,000. We think' that then we would like to start out in the car with no particular destination and with only one traveling bag each. When we arrive in a place that appeals to us we can stay in an apartment until such time as the appeal wears off or we decide to stay. “Since our income is adequate we are thinking of spending a poi tion of our savings each year i our travels until finally they wi have been spent . . .” This plan comes from a succes ful businessman in the centr part of the country. It represen the sort of dream most of us ha\ for a time, and one which retire people without much money mu.* regard with wonder. For this man, and others think ing along the same lines, it should be pointed out that the plan this man has win very probably lead him dawn the road to frustration and oblivion. Because— 1. You must search for, and study, the town you pick for re tirement. This for sure. But not as this couple is doing it. They’ll wind up as pensioned vagabonds because they will be asking in effect that every town they enter prove its virtue. 2. Almost without exception you will find that in California and Florida the people who have found their retirement towns good have given something to the towns be yond their handsome faces. They have gotten into the churches and civic organizations, and exerted themselves to be friends of peo ple. 3. Any couple who has made no close friends in a town of pro longed residence will not make them in Los Angeles either. And if Wichita or Newark did not de velop some emotions of loyalty and admiration, then Miami won’t. If you are seeking a retirement paradise where the people and the town will be different in funda mentals from what you have had, hen you had better understand hat people are people and towns ire towns — everywhere. 4. Choosing a good retirement •wn is roughly a 75-25 project, ith 75 per cent of the choosing )ne in the living room at home, imate, racial characteristics, lucational levels, social habits, sts, and conveniences can pretty 11 be pinned down for any sec- i of the country by getting :s from the public library and /riting the section's Chamber oi Commerce. u« mw B—i Si ■*»■>»•> •• Baa*, oars, i Gaatoal V»w * Seventy-two uranium fuel as semblies were lowered by special equipment into the U-tubes in the reactor chamber. The loading pro cess will be followed by careful tests that will be repeated and ex panded before the plant is oper ational. Engineers, scientists, and tech nicians from the four CVNPA member companies: Carolina Pow er & Light company, Duke Pow er company, South Carolina Elec- ( trie and Gas company and Virgin ia Electric and Power company, shared in the delicate loading operation. Their men will operate the plant under approval of the AEG. When the fuel is loaded, crews will conduct more tests leading to a start-up date. The Parr project represent s $47.3 million commitment by the associates and the AEC. Of this amount, the four companies are contributing $34.3 million and the AEC $13 million. Parr will be the first site in the world where all three major meth ods of power generation can be used; water power in an existing hydro-electric plant; fossil fuel in an existing coal-fired steam elec tric plant; and atomic fuel in the nuclear plant.” That signalizes the beginning of a new era in the South, perhaps its effect will extend throughout the nation. The four companies, cooperat ing with the Atomic Energy Com mission, are leading the nation in an achievement of colossal signif icance. At our door is one of the marvels of today. How can congress acquire juris diction merely by declaring that an Act of Congress pre-empts a field of activity and excludes the States from such legislation ? The proposed act is to limit the scope of certain Supreme Court decisions but anyone informed on the Constitution must make the point that not only must Congress confine itself to the field pre scribed by the Constitution but the Acts of Congress outside that field are unconstitutional and void. I readily admit that the scope of Supreme Court jurisdiction should be prescribed by Act of Congress, as the Constitution pre scribes, but the scope of the Con gress itself is equally prescribed by the Constitution. Congress cannot lawfully en act laws without respect for the reserved powers of the States, as it is doing and has been doing. It is time to curb the Federal judiciary but let’s curb the Con gress and the Executive, too. All are violating the Constitution. Looking A head ...by Or. Gtorg* S. Btnson PRESIDENT—NATIONAL EDUCATION PROGRAM S«arcy, Arkansas As various Congressional com mittees go into action in an effort to get the facts about the nation’s economic condition in order to decide about the tax cut, a great many noises are going to be made. Along with the sound, there will be the fury. Some of it will make sense. The President having presented his economic messages and tax cut proposals, the public now sees that a tax cut is really not a tax cut at all. If the government makes up loss es through reforms but cuts back none of its spending, where is the gain? Or if the government keeps borrowing, then the tax cut is a “gift” of the government charged to the deficit. The little man on the street, who has more insight into the Kennedy family planning sessions than the pollsters give him credit for, already suspects that the whole idea was thought up more for '64 than to get the country moving. Any administration that can accomplish a tax cut can talk about it all the way to Novem ber. Besides, the naughty corpo rations (which do not vote) will get no advantages under the ad ministration’s proposals for some years to come. Our little man rea sons that if all the money avail able today isn't enough to pro duce good times, a few tax refund dollars to him won’t set off any boom. Barely A Start Our man in the street suspects rightly that money in the proper places is needed for a healthy economy. Besides money in the hands of consumers and savings banks, there must be plenty av ailable for new machinery and expanded factories to make new products and create new jobs. He senses that the proposed tax cut wil’ not achieve this. Our man (now off the street and reading his evening paper— unless it’s strike-bound) learns that the White House is talking compromise as Congress digs in, Its the politicians who want a tax cut most, not taxpayers who are wondering about taxes on gifts and estates and. pension plans but who would like to have a little extra for a flyer in busi ness. It has been figur3d that a cut at the top of the personal in^ come tax rate from 91 to 65 per cent would make a dollar (45c dollars already) of income in this bracket worth 35c instead of nine cents. This is barely a start. Financing the Cut If we could only get across the idea that taxes don’t have to be high and break the high tax habit of ;he federal government, that would be something! But the right place to start on that wonld be to cut the demands tW!af Tire ihade on the tax revenue. Tax r a t e s' could then come down so low thatj not many reforms would be need-; ed. Our wondering citizen sees] this cart-before-horse situation^ He realizes that soak-the-rich taxes and wartime rates that res trained business have long out lived their usefulness. But if we bring down revenue a few billion will the government get along without it? 4*- t Not at all, learns our little man living under big government. No real budget sacrifices are to ac company the cutting of taxes. We are to go right on spending, and the national debt ceiling will have to be raised to accommodate the borrowing required to support government programs in the high style to which they have grown accustomed. Deficit spending, therefore, will underwrite the tax slash. So—the government wants to borrow (and inflate the cur rency in the deal) just to be able to afford a tax cut so as to put mom mofiey in circulation! That’s a didofe-barrelled charge. Release The Economy How can anyone justify a tax reduction that is a “gift” from the government? How absurd it is. Let’s not get our whole nat ional ,idea warped and confused, a thing we are in danger of doing if we do not return to the funda mental view that the income a man makes is his own. If we are to retain the freedom of our peo ple to save and to invest in en terprise, we had better re-think the whole idea of the steeply graduated income tax. Even Karl Marx foresaw it as the means of despotic encroachment “on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois produc tion.” Our economy needs to be re leased—our observing and increas ingly angry citizens agrees—from the chains of bondage created by ever growing demands of goveirn - ment spending. We do not need bigger deficits and more money released, all in the name of growth. What we do need is a restoration of incentive, with stable prices and sound dollars so as to achieve balanced increases in production and consumption. Let us unleash the forces of this free economy by restraining our profligate government. 7 ;v. ’■ *•#*•' -w- -• i.. Woman makes the home...we make the loan A woman’s touch makes a home, but good financing makes it a happier home to own. Want to buy or build this year? Let us help with the financing. For a home loan tailored to your needs, come in and ask to see one of our home loan specialists. CURRENT DIVIDEND RATE PER ANNUM (Compounded Semi-Annually) A SAVIN AVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION t»B9 BOLLMOM BTMMMT, MBWBMBMY, 9. O. J. F. CLARKSON M. O. SUMMER DIRECTORS j G. K. DOMINICK J. K. WILLINGHAM ji BRANCH OFFICE — Bafesburg, S. C. E. B. PURCELL W. C. HUFFMAN