The sun. [volume] (Newberry, S.C.) 1937-1972, August 31, 1961, Image 2
PAGE TWO
THE NEWBERRY SUN, NEWBERRY, SOUTH CAROLINA
THURSDAY, AUGUST 31, 1961
u«
1218 ColWye Street
MEWBERRY. S. C.
PUBLISHED EVERY THURSDAY
O F Armfield. Jr. Owner
Second-Class postage paid at Newberry, South
Carolina.
SUBSCRIPTION RATES: $2.00 per year in ad-
M?ue: months, $1.25.
Straight Talk.
COMMENTS ON MEN AND THINGS
The election of Charles E. Boineau, Jr. to the Legislature
from Richland county is being generally interpreted as a
repudiation of the extravagant ideas of President Kennedy.
Many citizens are uneasy about the colossal National debt
and the extravagant program which Congress is rather lamely
adopting.
Since the Constitution vests the Congress with the power
to curb the President and the Supreme Court Congress must
be charged with gross dereliction for failing to exercise its
powers.
The plan to draw billions from the Treasury under a blank
and blanket authorization, by-passing Congress year by year,
it is a dangerous plan which began with Mr. Roosevelt.
If the Congress authorizes billions to be drawn from the
Treasury as the President may wish makes one think that the
Congress itself is an unnecessary body and of no real value.
If all the Congress does is to approve, willy-nilly, all that the
President wishes then let’s do away with Congress.
Men from Texas are aroused and I have just read two let
ters from that great State, one from Paris, Texas; and the
other from Beaumont, Texas. I might point out that Texas
recently elected a Republican to the United States Senate to
succeed Vice President Johnson. It was a notable declaration
of independence and a sharp rebuke to the Kfetltfedy Adminis
tration .After years of Ljmdon Johnson and Speaker Sam
Rayburn all the candidates, Democrat and Republican, ran
as Conservatives.
Letter number one from Paris:
“About the Federal effort to block the operation of long
term, tax-free trusts leads me to suggest that the Federal
people might w’ell be alarmed about the growth of tax-shelt
ered cooperatives and their ultimate possible effects on taxes.
Through'their partial freedom from taxes paid by competing
enterprises, they could eventually destroy the entire tax base
of some competing enterprises.
Atrip through western Kansas and Oklahoma last fall fur
nished striking visual evidence of one example. Time atter
time I saw a huge grain elevator with the sign of some co
op on it; nearby there would be an abandoned elevator beanng
the barely legible name of some individual or firm, and loo •
ing like the derelict it was.’ . . i,
Somewhat akin to the letter from Paris, Texas, is the
letter from Beaumont: , T ^ 1 ^ .... ,. A ,
“Mr H M. Burrows stated that Rural ElectidJication Ad
ministration loans were first offered private
ies and were refused. I feel compelled to disagf^i*^^ this
statement. . .
In May, 1935, the utility companies were asked4#Absent
a plan for rural construction by Moris L. Cooke, h^a -Of the
REA. On July 25, the day after he received the plan, Cooke
announced that preference for REA loans would be given to
‘applications from municipalities and other agencies of the
state and to non-profit associations such as cooperatives .
This statement was a complete reversal of what the privately-
owned companies had been led to believe. Cooke had told them
that the bulk of the appropriation would be available to_ the
power companies since they had physical facilities and trained
personnel to do the job.
Grover Neff of Wisconsin Power and Light company, de
termined to apply for a loan regardless of new' policy, sub
mitted an application in August 1935. The application was un
der consideration for three months. On November 5. it was
rejected. The application was revised and submitted again.
Cooke did not bother to answer his letter.
Granted REA has served a purpose. However, rural cooper
atives are now' seeking to move into cities where they will be
in direct competition with tax-paying, investor-owned com
panics.”
Henry Hazlitt in Newsweek tells the story of our National
financial folly:
“The President told Congress that in order to improve our
posture with regard to the defense of Berlin we need to spend
$3.5 billion more ‘n this fiscal year. This is a total increase
in the defense budget of $6 billion since January. Suppose we
accept the need for this $6 billion. \\ hy w*as it not asked for
in May, w'hen Mr. Kennedy requested only 82.5 billion addi
tional?? The objective situation has not visibly changed.
Khruschev w r as threatening Berlin in May. \\ e already knew
then that he w'ould threaten Berlin again and probably half a
dozen other places. The new request gives an air of improv
isation to the May request. It raises the question whether the
present request may not also be improvised. Is Mr. Kennedy
going to ask for new billions every time Khrushchev makes a
new threat? That would give the Russian a cheap and easy
way to lure us into spending ourselves into runaway inflation
or crushing taxation. .
“The President’s new requests raise his total defense bud
get to $47.5 billion. Whenever any serious investigation has
been made of military spending—by the Hoover commission or
a Congressional committee—it has turned up huge w^aste and
duplication. It is discouraging that Mr. Kennedy's? review's of
the military budget have suggested no offsetting economics
of any importance. a
We now’ come to the non-defense budget. The overwhelm
ing bulk of discussion consistently forgets that this is tre
mendous. The total Federal spending budget, including social
security, exceeds $100 billion. Non-defense expenditures ex
ceed $50 billion, or more than half. Yet not only has Mr. Ken
nedy not suggested any offsetting economics in any of .these;
he has poured into Congress since he came into office some
50 messages, nearly all of w’hich have called for more "spend
ing in some new' direction. In this $50 billion of non-defense
expenditures, covering every conceivable activity, from aiding
‘depressed areas’ to landing a man on the moon, there are in
finitely rich opportunities for economy. Probably $3.5 billion
could profitably be cut out of either crop supports or foreign
aid alone.”
“Yet the President looks with complacency upon a budget
deficit of more than $5 billion in the current fiscal year
(which still has nearly eleven months to run) on top of that
of nearly $4 billion for the fiscal year just closed. Not until
the fiscal year 1963 does he promise a budget ‘strictly in bal
ance’. Even this balance, he hints, is to be achieved not by
economics but by ‘an increase in taxes’. Thus the President
would put even more burdens on the already overburdened
taxpayer. He neither asks nor hints at any sacrifices what
ever for the multitudinous pressure groups that are now par
asitic on the taxpayer.”
Reversing a long line of deci-' open Supreme Court sessions with
i sions, the Supreme Court recently prayer and our Supreme Court
| handed down a decision ruling has decreed that God has no place
! that it is unconstitutional for the in the schoQlroom. It might of-
i Federal Government, or any state,; fend some of our world brothers
' to require a “belief in the exist- who favor atheism or Voodooism.
! ence of God’’ as a qualification for Why are we in this fix? Well-
public office. They based this de- meaning, non-Communist church
| cision on the First Amendment of leaders have played a major role.
Freedom of Religion. Are all the In a recent article, one of our
I oaths taken heretofore by public most prominent church leaders,,
j officials null and void? A law Dr. Nels F. S. Ferre, said that
; passed in 1884 provides that “the his “hope and goal is that the
oath to be taken by any person Christian forces disassociate'
elected or appointed to any office themselves from capitalist idea-
of honor or profit, either in the
Civil, Military or Naval Service,”
must include the words “So Help Swedish
Me God.”
In the ruling, the Warren Court
said that “belief in the existence
of God” as a qualification for pub
lic office “unconstitutionally in
vades the appellant’s freedom of
belief and religion and therefore
cannot be enforced against him.”
Our national motto is “In God
We Trust,” and this motto ap
pears upon all of our currency and
coins. Will all of this currency,
and these coins be unconstitution
al as legal tender? In 1954 we
changed the Pledge of Allegiance
and added the words “under God.”
Does this Pledge of Allegiance
now violate the Constitution? If
we can’t trust in God, whom can
we trust in? Certainly not in the
politicians on the Supreme Court.
The Declaration of Independence
refers four times to the existence
of the Creator. This “outdated”
ology.” He holds up Socialist Swe
den as the model for us, plugs
“maturity . . . f&r the
Christian forces in America.” I
saw that “Swedish maturity” first
hand, in late 1958. About half the
people of Sweden belong to the
Lutheran Church which is the of»
ficial state church. They don’t
tithe, in fact most of them don’t
voluntarily participate in the
church at all. Their dues are de
ducted like checked-off union
dues, social security, or withhold
ing tax. They don’t go to church,
they just belong. While driving
with a Swedish co-op official to
visit some farms, I asked: “What
church do you go to?”
“Well, I don’t go to any. 1 be
long to the Lutheran. The last
time I went was six and one-half
years ago when my boy was chris
tened. But I think church is good
for special occasions—funerals,
marriages, christenings.”
Socialism Is Materialism
document also refers to the Su-j It was during that visit to the
preme Judge of the W orld and. Socialist nations of Western Eu-
pledges our Nation to support the rope that I realized fully what
Declaration “with a firm' reliance; Socialism really is. I had called it
on the, protection of divine provi-1 the halfway house to Communism;
dence.” | Communism without the firing
Our government has agreed j squad. But those definitions were
good reason to) inadequate. Socialism is material-
ism. Socialism is the philosophy
^ that there’s ne
“But the necessity for reducing
; both government expenditures and
; taxes does not rest primarily on
the argument for equity or fair
ne
essential for promoting, instead
| of retarding, increased capital ac
cumulation, production, and eco
nomic growth. W"e need to abolish
all personal income tax rates ab
ove 50 per cent. These bring in
barely enough revenue to support
| the government for half a week.”
So far as anyone may under
stand the sentiment of South Car
olina today it is Conservative; we
; are disgusted with glamorous peo-
j pie of prodigal tendencies and we
are not
favors.
of the equal belly. In the Social
ist State, all bellies must be equal,
except the bellies of those in|
r. ^ charge. The Socialist man lives,!
ess. it rests on the far stronger , , , , ,, o-i
vtnimon fUo* .1 ; j • and votes, by bread alone. Social-
igument that this reduction is ; , I . •
ism anc Atheism are kissing cou
sins. W’here the state is big and
the individual is little, material
ism thrives. People in the Social
ist nations are confused. They
have been taught “idealistic real
ism,” “humanized theism,” “so
cialized democracy” and other
mixed-up theories denying God,
the profit motive, and individual
freedom. Sweden’s suicide rate is
the world’s highest and percent
age of illegitimate children is pro-
, , • i . bably not exceeded in any “civil-
f "vor° g W °' 1 y pr ° m,ses of! ized” nation. Open cohabitation
rp, ^ , j. .,. without benefit of cleigy is com-
Thousands of our citizens, men letel ac table social| jn a .
and women, of all occupations, are moral Sweden
| seriously concerned at the cons-! ° D T JoVn Xnnett, Dean of the
tani, increase in public spending; i e • u
and the ever-constant threat of plainTed thft r Sem,na, ' y l
increased taxation. We begin to hl'fw^ h Communism ts the
yearn for the simple life wheniTld ?° “d
one may live and work and enjov o * Sh ° Ul H J T "'‘h
ii- • . °ur Russian brothers, heln them
J his earnings without sacrificing v ^
his: hihn>- f,,,- uv 6 e 'oi\ v\aj \\e can, and march
I h n r k multitudinous hand-to-hand to a One-World non-
! horde of bureaucrats. , profit Socialist brotherhood
Quoting again from Captain r Contrary to P 0 P uIar opinion—
| Rickenbacker: * Communism and Fascism are not
“Government money means gov- ThevVe L-f extremt \ s '
eminent power, and in 1912 most N P ^ ^ same P od -
! of the government money belong-' f h ° p th f mean dictatorships backed by
|ed to the States, counties, citiesj T ^ ‘I “bberal” at
and towns These local govern-i f h , ®° abroad "l* 10 advocates
ments in 1912 spent more than the total transfer of P oll tcal po-
| two-thirds of all taxes collected Wer from the indmdual to
in the United States, while the ernment , the forced redistribution
Federal government controlled and I 0 J wealth and the denial of in-
! spent less than one-third Most of i dl 'idual freedom is knowingly or
the Federal revenue came f r o m ! unknowinglydenyingGod — is P r °-
customs duties and from taxes oJ Claimmg with socialist Walter
liquor and tobacco. The average
citizen rarely had contact with
the Federal government in 1912.
\\ hen V» oodrow Wilson told us
of the evils of concentrated pow
er Jess than nine per cent of our
entire national income was enough
to keep all the Federal and local
governments going. As I men
tioned, the Federal government
took less than one-third of all the
taxes—in other words, one-third
of the nine per cent collected in
1912.
How do we stand today? In
1960, all local and Federal taxes
took one-third of all our earnings,
against only nine per cent 50
short two years ago, and the
Federal government took, controll
ed, and spend 70 per cent of that.
The liberals say that the Federal
government has grown along with
the population, which is a clever
way of saying it has strangled us.
Back in 1912 the Federal gov
ernment took and spent $7 for
every person in the population.
In 1960 it took and spent $450
for every man, woman, and child
m the country. Thus the Federal
government takes and spends to
day about 65 times as much, per
person, as it did 50 shorts vears
ago.
Of course, this disastrous in-
Reuther, that “Man is God.”
Men fought, bled and died for
centuries for freedom—God-given
individual freedom. It is the in
alienable right of man to be let
alone—as long as he is not harm
ing his neighbor. People are born,
not equal, but free. Man is born
free to choose, free to exercise,
his own will, to develop his own
personality—as long as he does
not injure his fellow man. A slave
is a person whose will is in the
possession of another. The more
decisions the government denies
to us, the nearer we are to slavery.
The Great Issue of Our Time
The great issue of our time is
not economic, it’s moral. The U.S.
has many problems. But one over
shadows all others. That problem
is morality. We try to bribe and
buy the world. America is losing
its sense of moral indignation. Co
existence is immoral. America is
losing its guts. Pinks are people
who’re too yellow to be red.
Government compulsion is es
sentially evil. God made men free.
Without freedom morality can’t
survive, without morality freedom
can’t survive. America has a great
mission to perform: to save the
world from slavery; to save the
world for Christianity.
What can YOU do? If our RE-
crease in Federal taxation has ser- PUBLIC can be saved from be-
iously injured every American’s comia g a Socialist-welfare dicta-
power to spend or save what he tors hip k can only be saved the
or she has earned. But there is a same wa T it was founded: by re-
deeper and more dangerous injurv. hellious patriots. By a grassroots
For government money is govern- evolution bent on unseating, de
ment power, and the- Federal gov-', featin g> impeaching these cynical
ernment today has 65 times as, manipulators of our lives. By re-
much power to invade the per- sponsible citizens demanding a re-
sonal liberty of every American turn to the Constitution, the great-
citizen as it had in 1912!” i est freedom document ever devis-
SENATOR
STROM
RMOND
Socialism and Censorship
FOR SOME years it has been
obvious that the efforts of our
government to win the protracted
conflict against communism have
been repeatedly frustrated. Many
Americans have concluded that
“something is bad wrong” but
have been unable to put their
finger on the trouble. They have
witnessed the outward signs and
have labeled them as signs of
“appeasement” or a “soft-on-com-
munism” attitude.
THERE ARE those, both out
side and within the government,
who, although
rarely in top
positions, are
able to exer
cise great in
fluence on pol
icies. Attempts
to ferret out
“commu n i s t s
in govern
ment” will not
expose these
people, for they are not commu
nists. They are dangerous, how
ever, and to them must be attrib
uted the frustration of effective
conduct of our policies and actions
in the protracted conflict.
SO SUCCESSFUL have the
frustrators been in crippling our
cold war effectiveness that some
of them are now venturing into
the open in order to spread their
influence more widely. One of
their favorite themes is to the
effect that “the welfare state is
the best defense against com
munism.” This statement is a key
to their exposure, for it reveals
their philosophy.
G. D. H. COLE, a leading so
cialist spokesman, wrote an ar
ticle in the communist publica
tion, Masses and Mainstream, en
titled “Is There Common Ground ?”
In this article he delineated the
“common ground” between so
cialists and communists. The sec
ond of the four points of “com
mon gi’ound” listed by Cole is:
“Secondly, communists and so
cialists agree in seeking to estab
lish for all peoples some sort of
welfare state or society.” Clearly,
a welfare state is not only no
defense against communism, but
is part and parcel of communism.
SOCIALISM is a philosophy
which embraces government own
ership of the principal tools of
production and transportation. It
deplores, and seeks to end, pri
vate property rights and the
(Not printed at government expense)
T WASHINGTON
SMALL BUSINESS
By C. WILSON HARDER
There appears to be gather
ing force on Capitol Hill a grow
ing but determined band of
patriots bent on stopping the
outflow of tax dollars to sup
port and comfort the enemy.
* * *
For some time men such as
Rep. John Dowdy of Texas
have deplored
the practice
of the State
Dept, where
by any nation
that wants to
dip into U. S.
foreign give
away funds
only has to
make protes
tations that
unless this c . W. Harder
cumshaw is paid, they are go
ing to have to go communist.
* * *
Recently Rep. Dowdy had
bitter things to say about ran
som negotiations that were car
ried on with Castro.
* * *
Although this venture was
not launched as an official gov
ernment project, it did high
light fact there are people in
this country who are willing to
negotiate blackmail.
* * *
And there are signs that
Congress is getting more and
more wary of letting the bur
eaucrats swing as much power
as they have been doing. Rep.
Richard Roudebush of Indiana,
said recently on the Edward
Yellin case, “It is discouraging
that government agencies need
prodding by Congressional com
mittees before they can act in
flagrant cases involving per
sons whose loyalty to the U. S.
is questionable.”
* * *
Rep. Roudebush was refer
ring to the recent scene in
Washington when the House
Spice Committee held hearings
which forced the National Sci
ence Foundation to cancel the
awarding of a $3,800 tax paid
© National Federation of Independent Business
scientific f '!lowship to Edward
Yellin, 33, a University of Illin
ois student.
* * *
In 1958, before a Congress
ional Committee, Yellin re
fused to say whether or not
he was a communist. He was
convicted of contempt of Cong
ress, and the verdict was up
held by a U. S. Court.
* * *
Yet against this background,
the bureaucrats of the National
Science Foundation gave him
a two year scholarship in ad
vanced engineering and re
fused to rescind the error un
til forced by Congress.
* * *
There seems to be a tendency
in certain professional educa
tion circles to brand any in
quiry into a man’s belief on
communism as “anti-intellec-
tualism.”
* * *
This phenomena is a peculi
arly American one. In Russia
there does not seem to exist
this “anti-intellectual” hue and
cry when someone gives strong
suspicion of being a capital
ist. If he is lucky enough to
escape a hole in the head, it is
a certainty the Russian purse
is not going to be used to sub
sidize him to get an education.
* * *
The terrifying aspect of all
this is that National Science
Foundation has awarded some
18,000 of scholarships at cost to
taxpayers of some $45,000,000.
# * •
The public can only wonder if
this bureau “goofed” on other
appointments. As Rep. Roude
bush says “A communist in a
college community is a cancer
that cannot be tolerated, as one
communist on a college cam
pus, well-trained and disci
plined in communist tactics,
can attract and influence good
American students who may be
politically naive.” There seems
little rhyme or reason for taxes
to support such people.
profit motive. Private property
right* cannot be destroyed with
out destroying political rights,
and, indeed, all liberty. If you de
stroy economic freedom, all other
liberty must fall, for liberty is
indivisible. Thus the precepts of
socialism, if embraced in America,
will destroy our liberty and estab
lish a centralized authoritarian
government. Will bondage be any
less onerous to Americans because
their bonds were forged by social
ists rather than communists?
THERE NOW appears evidence
that the dangers of socialist in
fluence in this country go much
deeper than the advancement of
“welfare state” programs, which
by their nature are goals shared
by communist philosophy. The
“common ground” shared by the
“2” isms must breed a distaste
in socialists for U. S. nationalism
and militant a n t i - communism.
Their attitude is reflected and
their power of influence is proved
by the pattern of censorship of
speeches of U. S. officials.
THESE ARE some of the ex
pressions which have been con
sistently censored from speeches
of U. S. officials: “Communist
conspiracy directed toward abso
lute domination of the world”;
“the steady advance of commu-
nUm”; “Soviets have not relented
in tne slightest in their determi
nation to dominate the world”;
“Nothing has happened to indi
cate that the goals of internation
al communism have changed.”
THERE CAN be no valid rea
son for censoring such expres
sions if the censors embrace the
American economic and political
systems. If, however, there are
socialists among the censors, or
in a position to influence the cen
sors, such actions are understand
able, and the dangers apparent.
THIS PATTERN of censorship
is but one means by which the
policies which would advance our
efforts in the protracted conflict
against communism are frus
trated. It is really of little con
sequence if socialists within this
country are motivated by desire
for socialist goals rather than
sympathy for communism, if the
result is frustration of our fight
against communism. Motivations ,
are beside the point; it is results
that count. Our liberty is at stake, j*.
Sincerely,
1,
; J
3
-r
SUPERVISOR’S QUARTERLY
REPORT
FOURTH QUARTER—1960-1961
SALARIES $27,444.96
COUNTY HOME:
Salaries 559.00
Lights 71.22
Fertilizer 185.25
Supplies 50.06
Veterinary Service 9.00
♦ J*F '
Breeding Services 7.00
Seed 83.50
Livestock feed 61.30
Lakeside Rest Home 120.00
Machine Hire 64.00
CHAIN GANG:
Salaries 4,399.73
Food 632.55
Stripes — Clothing 527.23
Medical 453.25
Supplies T 185.16
Gas — Cook Stove 187.46
ROAD MAINTENANCE: f
Salaries 2,368.00
Wages 9,141.75
Topsoil 247.25
Lumber — 2,291.70
Concrete Pipe \ 2,180.31
Repairs—Truck parts and welding 875.00
Gas, Oil and Greases : 4,218.98
Tires and Tubes 1,646.78
Supplies 1,424.10
Grades blades and parts machinery 1,121.64
Electricity i . 87.87
Travel, expense—Supervisor 8.00
Creosote 518.57
MISCELLANEOUS CONTINGENT:
National Guard—Newberry and Whitmire 3,300.00
Deputy Sheriff’s office expense 255.00
Board of Assessors 1,391.30
Retirement contribution paid by county employees 1,129.41
Hospitalization insurance, employees 483.02
Demonstration Agent — Salary and Supplies 330.88
County Agent—Salary and Supplies 181.37
Colored Demonstration Agent—Salary and rent 355.63
County Health Department—Salary 1,168.03
Radio Maintenance 90.00
Colored County Agent—Salary and Supplies 378.90
Quarterly Report 88.00
Social Security—County portion 1,383.30
Child welfare 159.46
Bond Premiums 110.00
4-H Clubs—Girls x 57.55
Artificial ^reeding Association, 249.96
-Travel Expense—Coroner 75.00
Httsgp^LANEOUS CONTINGENJ—2F: .
Cffe^aPHUlp — I-_L! 57.74
Expense, Sheriff’s office, and miscellaneous expense 83.20
Magistrate’s phone and office rent 60.00
Magistrate’s Dieting 35.68
Safe protection 94.50
Pauper’s funeral 225.00
Commissioner of Election 600.00
SHERIFF’S DIETING:
Dieting prisoners 1,536.80
POST MORTEM AND LUNACY:
Lunacy Examinations 150.00
Post rtem examinations 139.00
Coroner’s inquest 24.50
Assistant Coroner 20.00
COURT EXPENSES:
Juror pay bills 575.10
Coroner’s jury pay bills 24.00
Magistrate’! trials 4.00
Library books 189.50
Witness fees 36.65
Sheriff’s travel, miscellaneous expense 219.48
REPAIR TO PUBLIC BUILDINGS:
Coal 44.03
Water, lights 737.88
Telephone 961.49
Fuel — Jail 237.56
Repairs ^and Supplies—Court House and Jail 867.52
Fuel, Liegro Agent; Gas stove, Jail and Agri Bldg. 151.11
Janitor Supplies r - 183.26
Ice 43.71
^hitmisB Library — * 88.25
BOOKS, STATIONERY, POSTAGE, PRINTING:
Sumps- , 20.00
'f’vintihg and advertising $98.41
P. O. Box rent ^ 90.00
plies 174.29
and fillers 533.44
Maintenance service 282.60
ed by man. What can ONE PER
SON do? You can stand up and
be counted—else you’ll soon b e
counted out. You can believe in
your God, in your country, and in
yourself—and IN THAT ORDER.
You can GO TO WORK, for God
and country. Maybe one man can’t
save the country—but he can TRY.
Mr. and Mrs. Harper Wherry
and daughter, Margaret, and Mary
Ruth Armfield spent the weekend
at Myrtle Beach.
Mr. and Mrs. Leroy Ander^n
and son, Eddie, spent several dairs
the first of the week at Pawley’s
Island.
Mr. and Mrs. W. M. Fennell, Jr.
H^AO-ON COLLISIONS
I VOUlL GET THE
SHOCK OF YOUR LIFE!
C4AP MAY3£ yfXJR LACTf)
“It never troubles the wolf how have moved to Newberry and are
many the sheep may be.” [ now residing at 1325 College St.-
M
TOUCH AN£L£C-1
TWC APfLlANCS mi£ V£Tf