The sun. [volume] (Newberry, S.C.) 1937-1972, February 02, 1961, Image 2
■jem
'i..*
PAGE TWO
THE NEWBERRY SUN, NEWBERRY, SOUTH CAROLINA
nn
1218 CoIWf* Street
NEWBERRY. S. C.
PUBLISHED EVERY THURSDAY
O. F. Armfield, Jr., Owner
Second-Class postage paid at Newberry, South
Carolina.
SUBSCRIPTION RATES: 82.00 per year,
vance; six months, |1.25. $
COMMENTS ON MEN AND THINGS
It is worth remembering that
cherish the battles in the Brit-
Parliament in the times of the
Stuarts. And we recall vividly the
stoat defiance of the King by
John Hampden and the illustrious
<caieer of Oliver Cromwell along
with the beheading of King
Charles the First.
Even the casual reader of his
tory recalls Oliver Cromwell and
the beheadings of King Charles.
Sometime later we hear the
stentorian voice of Patrick Henry
before a jury m the celebrated
Parson’s cause. Virginia had or
dered the payment of the Minis
ter’s salary in a depreciated cur
rency and the Minister appealed
to the King, George the Third.
Let me quote an historian:
"Henry was in the wrong, or
rather the Virginia assembly had
done wroijg, for it partially re
pudiated an honest debt by forc-
ing payment in a depreciated cur-
rency. But that was not the chief
question dealt with by Henry. The
question was, What right has a
king three thousand os away
to interfere in the private, inter
nal affairs of Virginia? Virginia
the right to make her own
was the burden of his
in annulling a law at the
request of a class, ‘a king, from
being a father to his people, de
generates into a tyrant, and for-
^eits all right to obedience.’ The
friends of his Majesty cried ‘trerv
son/ but the people were ripe for
andb a prophet and heard him
£ladly> so with the jury, for they
the parson only a penny,
fame of the orator spread far
wide. The people admired the
rising genius, and, as in the case
«£ Otis, their admiration was in
separably linked with what he
had said about their rights and
the infringement of those rights
by the king; and thus were sown
in the American heart the seeds
of discontent.”
Patrick Henry, all will recall,
denounced the Stamp Act of Par
liament, a rather mild tax, but
men were men in those days. And
the words of Patrick Henry rang
throughout the thirteen colonies.
“The promoters of this law in
Parliament doubtless expected
some protest from America, but
they were not prepared for the
violence of the opposition that
was awakened. A few weeks after
the news of the act reached the
colonies the storm broke forth in
all its fury. The Virginia legis
lature was then in session, and
Patrick Henry, who was now a
member, offered a series of resol
utions in which he declared that
the people of the colony were en
titled to all the privileges of
natural born subjects of England;
that they, through their assem
bly, had the exclusive right to
tax the colony; that they were not
bound to yield obedience to any
law, except of their own making,
designed to impose any taxation
whatsoever upon them; and that
any person or persons who as
sert or maintain such right ‘shall
be deemed an enemy to his Maj
esty’s colony.’ In supporting his
resolutions Henry made one of
his greatest speeches, in which
the well-known passage occurs,
‘Caesar had his Brutus, Charles I
his Cromwell, and George III’—
‘Treason’, shouted the speaker,
and the cry was echoed from the
chamber. ‘George III,’ continued
Henry firmly, ‘may profit by
SENATOR
STROM
RMOND
m
New Year, New Opportunities
THERE ARE many matters
that cry out for legislative action
in the new Congress. Any real
istic appraisal of. the political
climate will reveal the improba
bility of action on some of the
most badly needed legislation,
but there remains a wide area in
which diligence and persistence
might be rewarded with success.
THE FOREFRONT of the Con-
concern must necessarily
be with the
world- wide
struggle
against com
munism in
which we are
now eitgaged.
Our hopes for
victory depend
first on our
military
strength. The
Cuban and Laotian crises illus
trate the fact that “limited” wars
are more probable than an all-out
nuclear exchange. It is imperative,
therefore, that Congress provide
legislation to insure adequate de
fense forces to deal with such sit
uations, including more ground
ibices, modernization of Army
equipment and creation of suffi-
dent air-lift capability to insure
tiie complete mobility of such
forces. At the same time, Con
gress should provide whatever
funds and direct such reorganiza
tion of the Department of De
fense as is necessary to insure
maximum speed and results in
our missile and space programs.
THE MATTES of internal se-
carity is a part and parcel of our
overall struggle with communism.
tot the spring of 1959, the Su-
Court struck down the ex
industrial security pro-
The President subsequently
instituted s new and similar one
by Executive Order, but there is
grave danger that the new one
will also fall when it is considered
by the court. A comprehensive
program should be enacted by
Congress, and I will shortly re
introduce a bill to accomplish that
MILITARY STRENGTH is de
pendent on economic and indus
trial strength, and the economic
health and vigor of the country
is as an imperative a problem as
is our military posture. Besides
the obvious necessity for avoid
ing deficit spending, the Congress
should take affirmative action to
correct the outflow of gold and
the inefficiencies in the govern
ment’s fiscal procedures. Steps
taken to stem the loss of gold
reserves such as the restriction
on dependents of servicemen over
seas are insignificant and ignore
the source of the difficulty. If
all government dependents were
brought home from overseas, the
saving would be less than the de
ficit incurred by the imbalance of
spending of American tourists
abroad over spending of foreign
tourists here. Last week I joined
in sponsoring a bill to promote
foreign travel to the U. S. which
should trim the gap in this area
by $500 million annually. Fur
ther correction of this problem
depends on re-evaluation of our
foreign aid and trade programs.
EFFICIENCY in our fiscal pro
cedures demands the enactment of
legislation to authorize an “item”
Veto by the President, a single
appropriations procedure, and an
end to “back door spending” pro
cedures in the Congress, for each
of which I wili diligently seek
passage during this Congress.
THE OPERATION of the Ju
dicial branch of the government
requires many corrective meas
ures. We have already re-intro
duced S. 3, the “anti-pre-emption”
bill, which would prevent the
court from nullifying State laws
unless Congress so intended.
Shortly I will introduce a bill to
require a minimum of judicial
experience for appointment to the
Supreme Court, one to insure that
the Senate exercises its f “advice”
power on court appointments, and
another to require judicial ap
pointees to take an oath to sup
port and defend the Constitution.
THESE ARE a few of the
many specific actions which Con
gress should take this session and
which I intend to support with
all my vigor.
Sincerely,
(Not printed at government expense)
^ their example. If that be treas
on, make the most of it.’ The
old conservative members oppos
ed the resolutions, but Henry’s
impetuous eloquence carried them
through by a narrow margin.
These ringing resolutions were
sent over the land to the North
and to the South, and by mid
summer they had been publish
ed in all the leading newspapers
in America.”
So I wonder.
In 1787, the thirteen victorious
colonies, having won thei# sever-*"
al independence and now being
thirteen Sovereign States, decid
ed that their agreement for co-
operation was somewhat weak,
adopted a new agreement of co
operation known as the Constitu
tion.
The Sovereign States almost at
once adopted twelve amendments
to clarify the jurisdiction of the
General Government and to make
sure of the restrictions thereto.
So we have the 9th ari<I 10th A-
mendment.
In the plan of government a Su
preme Court was included, with
limited powers, as we find in
Article 3. “The judicial power of
the United States shall be vested
in one Supreme Court, and in such
inferior courts as the Congress
may from time to time ordain
and establish. . . The judicial po
wer shall extend to all cases in
law and equity arising under this
Constitution, the laws of the Un
ited States, and treaties made,
or which shall be made, under
their authority: to all cases af
fecting ambassadors, other pub
lic ministers and Consuls; to all
cases of Admiralty and Mari
time Jurisdiction, etc. . .
In all cases affecting Ambassa
dors, other public Ministers and
Consuls, and those in which a
State shall be a party, the Su
preme Court shall have original
jurisdiction. In all other cases be
fore mentioned the Supreme
Court shall have appellate juris
diction, both as to law and fact,
with such exceptions, and under
such regulations, as the Con
gress shall make.”
Nothing in the Constitution or
Amendments clothes the Supreme
Court with power to invalidate
an Act of Congress or a State
Law. That power was assumed
as a sort of implied power, but
the makers of the Constitution
had no such idea; they were pro
foundly versed in the English
law and practice and knew that
no British Court dare invalidate
an Act of Parliament. And that is
true today.
Quite likely the original inten
tion was that the States,-in'Con
vention, should decide all such
matters, since all the power re
sided in the sovereign states.
What is appellate jurisdiction?
An appeal on the law as cited
in cases between man and man.
It was never contemplated that
the Executive branch of the Go
vernment should appear in court
against an individual or group
as a Party in interest, simply to
make capital out of some politi
cal or sociological dream.
Nor did anyone think of the
Supreme Court assuming Exe
cutive prerogatives and sending
squads to enforce the law, or the
assumed law based on judicial
usurpation.
Is it wrong to resist the Su
preme Cv j*t? Well, think of
what happ ned to King Charles
and to Kin* George the Third.
But we have a case in point, as
the lawyers say. When the Su
preme Court of the United States
declared the law in the Dred
Scott case the people of the
North denounced the court in un
measured terms of vituperation
that must have been wholly ad
mirable, eh?
That Dred Scott decision play
ed quite a part in bringing on
the Civil War!! Chief Justice Ta
ney merely declared the law of the
land, but the North was inflam
ed.
And the great court, resting in
unapproachable sanctity, has been
known to reverse itself!!
So why try to clothe it with
inf allability ?
Nothing in our Constitution
confers on the Federal judiciary
jurisdiction over school matters
and school finances or school at
tendance.
But the court rests its decision
on the 14th Amendment!! That
Amendment, so-called, was never
validly adopted and cannot be
made valid by the Supreme Court.
I wish our General Assembly
would choose a commission of
five eminent historians and five
eminent lawyers to prepare a
statement to the world about the
alleged 14th Amendment.
Let us not choose politicians
who practice law or teach his
tory. Let us have such a pre-emi
nent Carolinian as our State
Chief Justice and Judge Henry
Johnson, with three out-of-state
lawyers; and among the historian
include Raymond Moley.
I assert unequivocably that the
14th Amendment which has never
been validly adopted or pro
claimed is no part of the Con
stitution and has no claim to our
respect or observance.
Although I stand on that, I
take occasion to cite the alltged
great Amendment.
The Sovereign State of Geor-
—
~
ft *
WASHINGTON AND
'SMALL BUSINESS
By C. WILSON HARDER
Probably not since 1861 has
the question of state rights vs.
federal rights been so acute as
right now. Ere long, perhaps in
the next session of Congress,
there will have to be a clear cut
definition-on this issue.. For the,
past eight years, apparently
acting on some basis of a fuzzy
type of lib
eralism, the
U. S. Supreme
Court ap
pears to be
batting all
over the ball
park, show
ing every
sign /chat
some vsry
definite Con
gressional C. W. Harder
acts are required to set the
matter straight.
• a a
As it stands now. the Su
preme Court is closely ap
proaching legislative powers in
stead of confining itself to in
terpretative powers. Just re
cently In a nationwide ballot,
70% of the nation’s independent
businessmen, voting through
the National Federation of In
dependent Business, supported
H. R. 4696 which would have
stopped Federal courts from
overriding state laws.
a a a
One of the more recent deci
sions of the U. S. Supreme Court
is creating a great deal of dis
cussion not only in Washington,
but* wherever businessmen
meet. This decision is loaded
with dynamite.
a a a
For the essence of the courts
ruling was that unions, with
Federal backing, may be able
to force businessmen to bargain
with the unions on plans to re-
I duce the working force.
a a a
Just how far this decision
could be applied is so far an
unknown quantity.
(g) National Federation of Independent Batin—
By and large, most business
fluctuate, often due to circum
stances beyond the control of
the business, such as loss of
markets due to major strikes,
or loss of customers to compet
itors. i^ho then fays the help,
when there’s nothing coming in.
a a a
Or to take a not too far
fetched case. What would have
happened, if this decision had
been in affect last year, to a
major cranberry wholesaler,
when some bureaucrat popped
off and put him, and others out
of business overnight It makes
no difference now that the gov
ernment is planning to pay off
some $10,000,000 to offset un
justified losses caused by the
bureaucratic verbal show off;
what would have happened last
year if the cranberry mer
chants had not been able to lay
off the help right now.
* * *
Actually, this recent Supreme
Court decision is one of the
most dtage.'ous decisions ever
handed down and one that the
next Congress will have to
speedily remedy before major
catastrophe sweeps the nation.
* * * ..
For example, this decision
could very well end up by
many, many companies being
completely owned by the
unions.
• * *
It could come about quite
simply. A company, faced with
a temporary sharp decline in
sales, could conceivably by hav
ing to keep all employees on
the payroll, go under trying to
pay idle workers. The workers
would then have labor liens as
prior claims. Out of their vast
treasuries unions could satisfy
the labor liens, take over the
company. It’s a grim prospect.
Congress must act.
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 2/1961
——
gia does not abridge the privi
leges or immunities of anyone in
prescribing terms of admission
to higher institutions. And as to
“Equal protection of the law,”
the Federal Government is pam
pering and petting one set of
citizens as against all others.
T. V. A. for example.
For the information of the
Great Court in. Washington, there
is a concluding paragraph in the,
so-called Fourteenth Amendment
that the dim vision of the learn
ed justices apparently could not
decipher. And it says: “The Co:
gress shall have the power
enforce by appropriate legislatio:
the provisions of this Article.
That is the last paragraph of the
alleged Fourteenth Amendment.
What has Congress done? No
thing. Congress is—and has been
afraid that some court, steeped in
the law of the land, would de
clare the alleged Amendment in
valid. 0
However, since we can hope
for no relief short of a second
Patrick Henry, why does not the
Congress act, as the Constitution
provides ?
Don’t they know that the Court
has invalidated decisions of great
States because Congress has pre
empted the field? How can Con
gress pre-empt any area of law
beyond its constitutional powers?
What about the powers of Con
gress? It shall have power “To
make all laws which shall be ne
cessary and proper for carrying
into execution the foregoing po
wers, and all other powers vested
by this Constitution in the Govern
ment of the United States, or
in any department or officer
thereof.”
Now the 9th Amendment and
the 10th Amendment} (9th) The
enumeration in the Constitution
of certain rights shall not be con-
Group Discusses
Educational TV
The January meeting of the
Newberry Branch of the Ameri
can Association of University
Women was held recently at the
home of Mrs. C. M. Smith. Mrs.
Furman Sterling, president, pre
sided.
After a short business session,
during which the reports of offi
cers and * chairmen were given,
Miss Margaret Paysinger, pro
gram chairman, presented Mrs. F.
Scott Elliott, Elementary and
Secondary Education chairman of
the branch, who led a program on
some of the trends and emphasis
in today’s education for youth.
The speaker began her discus
sion by quoting from an editorial
in The Saturday Review November
19, 1960, on “Education in Am
erica” which says “The unique
purpose for formal educational
institutions is the cultivation of
the mind, the promotion of learn
ing and the pursuit of intellectual
inquiry.” Learning takes place
only when change occurs in the
learner, Mrs. Elliott said, noting
that this change involves better
organization and use of time and
this involves both the teacher and
learner. The teacher, she said,
must be able to function at the
top of his professional competence
for the benefit of more learners.
At this point, Mrs. Elliott, who
is the mass media chairman of
the South Carolina Division of
AAUW, led her listeners into a
consideration of Television in edu
cation, citing the following facts:
“In September there were more
than 2,000,000 school children en
rolled in the schools of the nation
than had been anticipated. This
additional number required 6,000
extra teachers.
“Exponents of ETV, when point
ing out the main advantage of
this new aid to education, empha
size that this medium allows
children of small schools of the
country or sparsely settled sec
tions as, well as of larger schools
to gain the best of education and
could relieve teacher shortage
conditions. ^
“South Carolina established the
first state-wide closed circuit ETV
system anywhere in the world.
By this means every high school
PATIENTS
NEWBERRY COUNTY
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
Oscar Porter, 1209 Pope St.
Elmer Whitman, Rt. 2.
Mrs. Mattie Fellers, 1001 Har
rington St.
Mrs. Alice Faye Bedenbaugh,
Rt. 2, Prosperity.
s trued to deny or disparage oth
ers retained by the people.” (TOth)
“The powers not delegated to the
United States by the Constitu
tion, nor prohibited by it to the
States, are reserved to the States
respectively or to the people.-” .
Now tell me where the Supreme
Court finds the lawful power to
become a dictatorial body, trampL
ling on the Sovereign States? And
I challenge its assumption of pow
er even without including the
challenge to the alleged 14th Am
endment. And vhe failure of the
Congress to meet the issue square
ly.
St
Mrs. Chloe Amick, 1480 Ebenez-
er Rd.
Mrs. Eunice Dehihns, P. O. Box
114, Newberry.
Johnnie Free, Pomaria.
Baby William Ellis Farmer, Ce
metery Dr., Whitmire.
Robert Green, Rt. 1, Kinards.
Mrs. Rebecca Gardner and baby
-girl, Rti 3. •
Cecil Kleckley, 2503 Fair Ave.
< Mrs. Belle Kitchens, Rt. 2, Kin
ards.
Mrs. Lottie Kelly, Rt. 2.
Miss Theresa Lightsey, - 2231
Main St.
Miss Nannie McKittrick, Rt. 1,
Kinards.
Louis Morris, 2012 Main St.
Mrs. Euna Mize, Rt. 1.
Mrs. Elsie Nichols, Rt. 2, Pros
perity, i
Mrs. Sarah Nichols, 1935 Evans
St. ,
Robert F. Nelson, Whitmire.
Annette Phillips, 607 Pope Cir.
William Taylor, 2889 Hunt Ave.
Mrs. Daisy Waters, Rt 4.
Mrs, Veda Wilson, Chappells.
Lindy Anderson, Rt 1, Chap
pells.
Sam Counts, 1506 Harris St
James Caughman, 2019 Vincent
St.
Tom Cannon, Little Mountain.
James Cannon Jr., Rt 3.
in the state can be served with
three channels of broadcasting
offering 36 regular daily sub
jects.
“Hie 1960-61 schools in 11
counties are receiving the bene
fits of televised classes and 60
other school® are receiving parts
of the pre i.”
Mrs. El) also mentioned the
Continental Classroom program,
“Contemporary Mathematics”
which began ^an. 30. Furman Uni
versity gives both graduate and
undergraduate credit for this
v class, ,yt.,
This was & most comprehensive
discussion, for which Mrs. Elliott
was thanked by Miss Paysinger.
Mark Dudley, 227 Crosson St
Thomas Gray, 725 Hunt St.
Freddie Lee Hawkins, Rt. 4. *
Geneva Hill, 703 McSwain St*
Adeline Lindsay, Rt. 4.
Johnnie Pitts, Rt. 1, Silver-
street.
*Baby Boy Robinson, Rt. 1, Po—
maria.
Bluford Simpson, Rt. 1, Kin
ards.
Albert Singley, Oil Mill Alley.
Catherine Vaughn, Rt* Sil-
Mr, Mahal. Smith. 22f)f> Mail, ve ^?£ W j lson> ^
W/;
Frank Wilson, Rfc 8.
■ tU
“V* sh' i'
MILLS CUNIC PAUBNTS i
Mrs., Sara Vaugha^JtcPsperitj.
Mrs. Jo Ann Dehardt, Prosper
ity* /■ ' *“
Mrs. Maggie Bell Somers, Po
maria.
Carl Epting, Prosperity.
Miss Lalla Martin, Newberry.
Mrs. Lizzie Bundrick, Prosper
ity.
William West, Leesville.
Olin' Dominick, Prosperity.
Catherine Gallman and baby
girl, Newberry.
Heavy Outlays for Aid to Polio Victims
Cause Drain 6$ March of Dimes Funds
“The National Founda
tion has the distinction and
the honor of having ex
hausted .its March of Dimes
funds for patient aid,” Basil
O’Connor, its president, an
nounced recently.
“Therefore, the March 0f
Dimes has a $45 million job to
do in 1961,” he added.
“But we always have had a
tremendous job to do and have
relied on the American people
for financial support
the March of Dimes each Jan
uary,” he said. “At the same
time, however, we do not live
just from year to year but
build broad research, educa
tional and patient-aid programs
for much longer periods. Con
tinuation of these programs
will require $45 million
1961.”
Speaking of the “urgent
monetary needs of the 1961
New March of Dimes,” to be
held Jan. 2-31, the leader of
the world’s largest voluntary
health organization explained
that in 1960 about one-third of
its 3,100 chapters had gone into
debt to meet hospital and other
bills for aid to polio patients.
“But our chapters are proud
that they have not built up
bank balances at the expense
of human lives,” he said
Since 1938, when The Na
tional Foundation (for Infan
tile Paralysis) was organized,
a total of $325,200,000 has been
spfent for direct patient aid to
polio victims. In 1960, the bill
was about $13,250,000 for some
40,000 of the polio-stricken. Al
though the Salk vaccine has
been available to the public for
five years, patient-aid costs re
main high chiefly for those
stricken before the vaccine was
developed, or for those who
since 1956 neglected to get in
oculated and thus contracted
polio.
March of Dimes monetary
assistance to individual polio
sufferers has sometimes been
extremely great. To cite two
instances only, patient-aid costs
in the case of Mrs. Ingeborg
Cully, of New York City, thus
far have totaled about $25,000
and the end is not in sight;
while expenditures for Tommy
mrnm MU
CHURCH CIRCLES
MEET MONDAY
Circles of Central Methodist.
Church WSCS will meet Monday,.
February 6 as follows:
No. 1, Mrs. S. A. Meek, 1901
Harrington St., 4 p.m.
No. 2, Home of Mrs. Thompson
Price, 1226 Calhoun St., 4
Miss Sallie Lee Cromer, hostess.
No. 3, Mrs. Charles H. Gray,
Bush River Rd., 10:30 a.m.
No. 4 (Julia White), Church So
cial Hall, 7:30 p.m.
No. 5, Mrs. Joe Roberts, 2021
Mower St, 10:30 sum.
No. 6, Mrs. Forrest Lominack*||
914 Glenn St, 4 p.m.
~"
AUDITOR’S 1961 TAX
ASSESSMENT NOTICE
I, or an authorized agent will
be at the following places on the
dates given below for the purpose
of taking tax returns on all per
sonal property, real property, new
buildings and real estate trans
fers. Parsons owning property in
more than one district must nuke
returns for each district,
All able-bodied male citizen*
the ages of twenty-one
sixty are liable to $1.99 poll
tax.
At Auditor’s Office to-, March
1st, after which a penalty of 10
per cent will be added. /
Ralph B. Black,
Auditor Newberry County
r s - j * . . . '
A
NAIIOfifli (TION OF BROADCASTER^
MOM
Easy to Listen to—-Select
ed Popular Music especial
ly for the Moms every
where.
radio \
m
2
1240 Kc.
r ui
..Vi.
Examples: $25,000 was spent on Ingeborg Cully .
Davey, six years old, of Boston,
have reached $50,000.
Aside from the enormous
financial toll in patient aid,
substantial New March of
Dimes contributions must also
be used for research. Since
1938 The National Foundation
has allocated $64,600,000 on its
broad-based international re
search program which has pro
duced, among other outstand
ing achievements, the Salk and
Sabin polio vaccines and, in
cidentally, two Nobel prizes.
In 1960, research funds are
estimated at $5,000,000 cover
ing The National Foundation’s
three health areas of birth de
fects, arthritis and polio.
More «than twice that sum,
or $10,400,000, is needed for re
search in 1961.
March of Dimes contribu
tions have also made possible
the largest education program
for the training of medical and
health experts ever attempted
by a voluntary health agency.
Since 1939, when The National
Foundation launched its pro
gram of professional education,
outlays in this field have to
taled $34,900,000; in 1960, a
total of $1,500,000 in March rf
. . . while another $50,000
was needed for Tommy Davey.
Dimes public contributions was
required for the health organ
ization’s professional education
activities. In 1961, $3,900,000 is
needed for this part of the pro
gram.
CAROLINA METAL WORKS
*
Sheet Metal - Heating - Air Conditioning
3
a
COLLEGE ST. EXTN. TEL. 115
A. G. McCAUGHRIN, Preeident A Treasurer.
Auditor’s 19(1 Tax Assessment Notice
■■ v ", • ; ■■ - • ' " ' • ■ ' u ; /v;
Returns of personal property, real property, new build*
'*41 • 1 ’ T
+ ‘ : .. . •' • ^
ings and real estate transfers, and poll tax are to be made
at the County Auditor’s Office beginning:
' January 3rd., 1961
THROUGH
February 28th., 1961
' .- ..y
§'
All able-bodied male citizens between the ages of twenty-
one and sixty are liable to $1.00 poll tax.
All returns are to be made by Tax Districts. Your failure
to make return calls for penalty as prescribed by law.
' RALPH B. BLACK,
Auditor Newberry County
Wk&k;