The sun. [volume] (Newberry, S.C.) 1937-1972, July 28, 1960, Image 2
PAGE TWO
THE NEWBERRY SUN, NEWBERRY, SOUTH CAROLINA
THURSDAY, JULY 28, 1960
1218 ColWjw StTMt
NEWBERRY. S. C.
PUBLLSHED EVERY THURSDAY
O. F. Armfield, Jr., Owner
Second-Class postage paid at Newberry, South
Carolina.
SUBSCRIPTION RATES: 82.00 per ye*r in ad
vance; six months, $1.25.
COMMENTS ON MEN AND THINGS
a man can reap a large return
by useful service he should be
encouraged, not penalized.
I am so deeply concerned about
the thinking, planning and the
spending by our National leaders
that I would like to see other
Congressmen follow the example
of the South Carolina men in the
Senate and House who are four
square against the futile spend
ing known as Foreign Aid.
President Eisenhower, go o d
man in his purposes, is entirely
Igoff ba^, for he has ;Jbeen ajsold-
ier all his life, not a man in the
tumult of business; he is, at times
a visionary.
“Our foreign aid program has
been going on ever since the war.
Our position in the world is worse
now than it was when we started
handing out money to all comers.
It has been claimed, and is still
being claimed, that foreign aid
giveaways will improve living
Did you ever wonder at the re
markable sagacity which formula
ted the plans to control our farm
production in the effort to pre
vent over-production ? If the de
mand for cotton is for twenty
million bales, for example, how
would ordinary common sense sug
gest as the method of control ? As
I see it, the obvious plan would be
to determine the pounds of cot
ton, not the number of bales,
since some bales weigh five hun
dred pounds; some five hundred
and fifty; some four hundred and
ninety pounds.
The solution, apparently, would
be in pounds. That is so clear that
must wonder at the cumber-
expensive and unsatisfac-
plan now in use.
A farmer on my land was en
titled to plant 5 9acres; he actu
ally planted 62, by official meas-
nrement. That does not surprise
me; the average farmer is not a
anrveyor, nor am I.
Instead of allotting or allocat
ing fifty acres to a farmer why
not allow him 20,000 pounds, or
30,000 pounds of lint cot'oii?
The present plan is to allot, let
us say on an average fa.~m in our
Pee Dee county, 20 acres in cot-
ton; 2 acres in tobacco; some
wheat, peanuts, etc.
One farmer may produce an
average of a bale of cotton per
acre and fifteen hundred pounds
of tobacco; another farmer may
produce fifty per cent more per
acre; while still another may pro
duce 25 per cent less. Out in Ari
zona some farmers produce three
bales of cotton per acre.
It is well known that many far
mers, by liberal use of fertilizer,
better seed and closer planting
produce as much cotton and to
bacco on one acre as they form
erly produced on two acres. So
the control by acres is obviously
not realistic.
If controls are to be helpful
why not disregard the number of
acres and indicate the number of
pounds?
Today, throughout the farming
areas, a group of special survey
ors must measure the land after
the farmer has planted and then
they may have to measure again
to determine whether the farmer
la operating within his allotment.
And, as I’ve indicated the twenty
million acres in cotton may pro
duce fifteen million bales or twenty
five million bales. If, however,
the test were by pounds the re
sult w’ould be calculably right.
The present plan is about as
uncertain as would be a rule al
lowing a production of 20 hogs
to a farm without indicating the
total weight of the hogs. The av
erage might be 200 or 400 lbs.
I’ve often wondered w r ho w r as
the master-mind that contrived
the present arrangement.
Suppose we had a rule that on
ly forty ships might enter Charles
ton harbor a week. How would
that work out since ocean-going
ships vary in length from 300 ft.
to 1000 ft. and more. Certainly
the rule would be based on the
tonnage of the ships and other
factors, not on a mere number of
ships.
The travels of President Eisen
hower probably accomplish some
useful purpose in this day of dem
ocratic upheavals. People of other
lands, the average man, the so-
called common man, may be fav
orably impressed. And, we must
admit that crowds and throngs
exercise great influence. Even
here in the United States we see
the effect of pressures; we see
even our government turning so
mersaults in order to appeal to
the insistent appeals of certain
organized groups.
Although some good may be
done by the travels our exper
ience with the travels of Mr.
Roosevelt and his personal dip
lomacy have been sa disastrous
as to be a warning against pres
idential trips abroad as w T ell as
secret goodwill entertainment in
remote refuges.
The impressive need is for Am
ericans to think first
ica. A strong and rick
can be worth more to
than an America throwing money
away all over the world while
stifling growth and development
here at home.
If the corporation tax were 25
percent instead of 52 percent and
if the individual income tax were
set at an equitable percentage,
conditions in the less developed
countries of the world and create
new markets for American pro
ducts. It has been claimed, and
is still being claimed, that Wash
ington’s handouts of our money
will win friends and hold allies
for our country in the struggle
against the international Com
munist conspiracy. The facts
show that these claims have lit
tle or no justification.
If the entire national income
of the United States were spent
to improve the living conditions
of the hundreds of millions of
people in underdeveloped areas,
their living standard would not
be raised even by one per cent.
And such benefits as came would
not be lasting because of the
fast growing population of these
countries.
Under the foreign aid program,
American products and services
are bought with our tax dollars
and then given away to foreign
countries. How can trade be pro
moted that way ? The only way
to build new markets is the way
we have traditionally done it—the
businesslike method of sound pri
vate enterprise and investments
This method is the only one that
actually increases productivity,
and in doing so, enables the less
developed countries to get the
means to support themselves and
build up their own capital.
Can foreign aid buy trustwor
thy friends and allies ? The ans
wer has to be No. Friendship is
not obtained by bribery. A man—
or a nation—getting something
for nothing places on it the value
of precisely nothing. In fact, as
a former Prime Minister of
France once said, “Americans
manage to create something very
"near to hatred by the way they
give their aid.”
The greatest myth of all is
that communism can be weakened
and defeated by the American
foreign aid program. As a matter
of fact, it is part of the commun
ist doctrine that productive work
ers shall support the incompetent
and lazy. Isn’t that exactly what
we have been doing on an inter-
the same percentage to apply to
all incomes from $5000 (let us national scale with our foreign
say) o’u* nation would prosper
and profit immeasurably.
The graduated income tax is
unsound; all men should pay the
same percentage. Because our So
cialist thinking makes us afraid
of large incomes we are obstruct
ing initiative and incentive. If
aid program ? In fact, we have
.urned great sums of money over
to the outright communist gov
ernments of such countries as Po
land and Czechoslovakia.
Since the end of the war, we
have spent for foreign aid the
equivalent of about $1800 for ev-
NATIONWIDE.. WORLDWIDE
YOUR MONEY IS SAFE WITH
TRAVELERS CHECKS FROM
Thurmond
The so-called civil rights plank
of the Democratic platform is the
most extreme, unconstitutional,
and anti-Southern ever conceived
by any major political party. It
is difficult to imagine how a more
obnoxious and punitive approach
could have been composed. Even
^AACP, in all its fervor, has
et proposed mor& drastic
steps. Some of the most extreme
proposals and pronouncements
are:
1. A proposal that all school
districts submit a plan for inte
gration not later than 1963.
2. Authority for the Attorney
General of the United States to
bring suits in the name of, and
at the expense of, the United
States for any person whose “ci
vil rights” the Attorney General
thinks jeopardized or deprived.
This is the vicious Part III of the
1957 civil rights bill, rejected by
Congress in 1957 and in 1960, the
last time by a vote of 2 to 1.
3. Establishment of a Fair Em
ployment Practices Commission,
(FEPC) which would force any
and every employer to hire the
first applicant a federal commis
sion declared qualified for the
job, regardless of his race, color,
creed, or acceptability or com
patibility to other employees or
to the public.
4. Expression of approval of
“sit-ins” and “sit-downs” by Ne
groes in segregated privately-
owned eating facilities. This gives
sanction to an admittedly unlaw
ful act—a trespass, unlawful not
only in the South, but in every
one of the fifty states of the Un
ited States.
5. Proposes to make the Civil
Rights Co mmission permanent
and to extend the scope of its ob
streperous activities.
6. Proposes elimination of lit
eracy tests as qualifications for
voting—in other wafc-ds, nullify
the right of the States, under the
United States Constitution, to fix
voter qualifications.
7. As'extreme as are the fore
going proposals, the Democratic
platform managed to go even far
ther ,and I quote, “The time has
come to assure equal access - for
all Americans to all areas of
community life” which clearly in
cludes churches, fraternal orders,
civic clubs, and private associa
tions of every description.
The 1960 Democratic platform
is a blueprint for a welfare state
and an end to individual liberty
and dignity in the United States
of America.
It is a road map for economic
collapse and unconditional sur
render to the forces of socialism.
It is a chart for amalgamation
of the races and a reduction of
the individuals of which our coun
try is formed to the lowest com
mon denominator.
It sounds the final death-knell
of the Democratic party known to
our forebears and completes the
transition to a party dedicated to
socialism, welfare statism, con
formity, and centralization of po
wer.
CAUGHMAN
Mr. and Mrs. Calvin Caugh-
man, Rt. 3, Batesburg, announce
the birth of a seven pound, four
ounce son, Russell Wayne, on July
2 5at Newberry Hospital. Mrs.
Caughman is the former Miss
Imogene Hawkins.
Don't ruin your wonderful trip
by losing your money.
Stop at SCN
for travelers checks
before you go!
Good everywhere-
safe anywhere
Start a carefree vacation
at SCN.
ery family in America. But inter
national communism has not
grown weaker during that period.
It has grown stronger and has
swallowed up hundreds of mil
lions of people more in the world.
Why does foreign aid go on—
endlessly—year after year? Who
favors such squandering of our
resources on this program? One
group is made up of unrealistic
sentimentalists who persist in be
lieving, against all evidence to
the contrary, that we can buy in
ternational friendship. Another
group includes those who hope to
sell their products.”
Looking A. bead
v ... by Dr. Georg* S. Benson
PRESIDENT—NATIONAL
EDUCATION PROGRAM
Searcy, Arkansas
SOUTH CAROLINA NATIONAL BANK
Member Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
NEWBERRY
1119-21 BOYCE STREET
PHONE 1549
I should like to reorganize the
United Nations into an annual
meeting of Scientists, with no
standing Committees, no big
staff, no authority of any kind.
Since the days af Adam’s
grandsons the Have-nots have
been more numerous than the
Haves. Now that the Have-nots
are exercising the right to vote,
the age-old program finds ex
pression; let us take from those
who have and give to those who
have-not.
Those who have are like those
who put their capital to use and
made a profit; those who have
not are often like the man who
buried his talent in the earth.
All of you will recall the par
able of the Great Teacher about
talents.
The world hasn’t changed very
much, except politically the one
Supreme Consideration is votes.
So, if the Nation go to the bow
wows let it go if the voters so
wish.
This practice has some merit,
but it robs us of the real ability
of our men in authority because
they must first, last and all the
time keep their eyes on the voter.
Senator Barry Goldwater re
cently startled some of his poli
tical colleagues in Washington
with a recommendation that dip-
loi-'^tic recp^niUpn of Suyiet Rus
sia be wftharavim. After you have
read Senator Goldwater’s book,
The Conscience of a Conservative,
(Victor Publishing Co., Shep-
herdsville, Ky.), the consistency
of his recommendation is appar
ent. In his book he suggests that
Americans place their foreign pol
icy and their domestic govern
mental operation on the sound
foundation of moral law and com
mon sense.
He considers world communism
to be an evil force, our enemy in
a “cold war” that we are losing.
On the open record of history, he
considers the communist leaders
to be guilty of towering crimes
against mankind. And he notes
that the record of history shows
you cannot do business with them
without terrible injury. He de
clares that in our government’s
present drive for “peace” our peo
ple and our governmental leaders
must be made to realize that
peace “in which freedom and jus
tice will prevail. . . is a peace in
which Soviet power will no long
er be in a position to threaten us
and the rest of the world.”
A Must Goal
“A tolerable peace, in other
words,” he says, “must foL’ow
victory over Communism. We
have been 14 years trying to bury
that unpleasant fact. It cannot be
buried and any foreign policy
that ignores it will lead to our
extinction as a nation.”
The temptation is strong, Sen
ator Goldwater says,° “to blame
the deterioration of America’s for
tunes on the Soviet Union’s ac
quisition of nuclear weapons. But
this is self-delusion. The rot had
set in, the crumbling of our pos
ition w r as already observable,
long before the Communists de
tonated their first Atom Bomb.
Even in the early 1950’s when
America still held unquestioned
nuclear superiority, it was clear
wd" were losing the cold war. And
in the succeeding years, that
trend, because its cause remains,
has continued.
Who Wants To Win
The real cause of our contin
uing defeat in the Cold War can
be simply stated, Senator Gold-
water says: “Our enemies have
understood the nature of the
conflict, aflA w e have not. They
are determined to win the con
flict, and we are not. . . We have
tried to pacify the world. The
Communists mean to own it.”
He urges that our nation take
the offensive—and go for vic
tory. As guideposts in such an
offensive, he suggests:
Guideposts
“The key guidepost is the Ob
jective, and we must never lose
sight of it. It is not to wage a
struggle against Communism, but
to win it.
“2. Our strategy must be prim
arily offensive in nature.
‘.‘3. We must strive to achieve
and maintain military superior
ity.
“4. We must make America
economically strong.
“5. In all of our dealings with
foreign nations, we must behave
like a great power; our national
posture must reflect strength and
confidence and purpose, as well
as good will.
“6. Wo should adopt a dis
criminating foreign aid policy;
American aid should be furnished
only to friendly anti-Communist
nations that are willing to join
with us in the struggle for free
dom; and our aid should be loans,
not gifts.
“7. We should encourage the
captive people to revolt against
their Communist rulers—estab
lishing close liaison with under
ground leaders behind the Iron
Curtain, furnishing them with
printing presses, radios, weapons,
instructors; the paraphernalia of
a full-fledged resistance.
“8. W e should encourage
friendly people that have the
means and desire to do so to un
dertake offensive operations for
the recovery of their homelands.
wasThYnGTON AND
"SMALL BUSINESS
By C. WILSON HARDER
It is possible that due to this
being an election year. Con
gress will not complete all the
vital projects before adjourn
al ing. But there is no doubt, when
a tax revision bill is considered,
definite consideration will be
given on this
matter of tax-
‘j ation of coop
eratives.
* * *
The House
Ways and
Means Com
mittee, head
ed by Rep.
Wilbur Mills,
has already
gathered ex- C. W. Harder
tensive testimony on matter.
* * *
Basically, if the loopholes
in the income tax laws on co
operatives are not plugged, it
appears that in due time much
of the country’s independent
business will be forced into co
operative by tax law pressures
the same as Kremlin edicts
forced Russian business into
state owned stores.
* * *
Testifying before the commit
tee, George Burger, Washing
ton vice president of the Nation
al Federation of Independent
Business pointed out that on
four different occasions over
90% of the nation’s independent
businessmen members voted in
favor of closing the loopholes.
* * *
This is not an attack on simon
pure farmer cooperatives which
operate for cooperative mar
keting of farm crops.
* * *
But the laws on taxation of
cooperatives are so loose that
they have opened the gates for
promoters to develop all kinds
of business in manufacturing,
wholesaling, and retailing.
* * *
In the fields of chemical, min
ing, oil production, jet fuel
production, printing, food can-
© Nitloml Federation of Independent Bmlaeu
ning, and others, in past ten
years cooperatives have be
come a growing phenomena.
« * *
Under the laws as they now
stand, a private corporation,
wishing to lay aside profits for
expansion first has to pay out
52% for income taxes.
* * *
But an enterprise qualifying
under the present loose law
as a cooperative theoretically
pays out its profits in the form
of patronage dividends.
♦ • *
Theoretically, those who re
ceive the patronage dividends,
or refunds, as they are called
in cooperative circles, pays an
income tax on them.
* * *
But, a cooperative can hold
these dividends, or refunds, in
the business and by giving the
patrons certificates, which are
tantamount to stock, use the
money to finance expansion
plans.
* * ♦
In other instances, it has been
worked out so that an investor
in a cooperative mannfactnring
venture receives his returns In
the form of extra production
signed to agents for resale.
♦ * *
The investor then receives on
this production his patronage
refunds in the same manner as
if he had actually used the
goods himself, thus giving him
a much higher return on his
investment than any private
company could possibly pay.
* * *
There seems to be no ques
tion that there Is a legal right
for cooperative enterprises. The
question is should they be able
to compete with private indus
try on a tax basis that makes
competition with them all but
impossible. At present as alert
promoters have discovered, co
operatives are the biggest and
the best business tax dodge ex
isting.
HOSPITAL
Mrs. Sugftn Abrams, 1308 Cal
houn St. -|“v
Mrs. Cora Bigby, 1221 Glenn
St.
Mrs. Sallie Boozer, Newberry.
Mrs. Inkaigen* Caughman and
Baby Boy, Batesburg.
Mrs. Mary Cannon, Walnut St.
Mis. Eloise Earhardt, Cline St.
George H. Jreagle, Vaidosta, Ga.
Mrs. Genevieve Frye, Newberry
Mrs. Mary E. Fulmer, Newber
ry.
James C. Gallagher, Newberry.
Mrs. Betty . Kibler, Newberry.
Mrs. Lizzie Kinard, Rt. 2.
Mrs. Elise Long, Newberry.
Rufus Monts, Prosperity.
Mrs. Euqa Mize, Newberry.
Mrs. Judy Miller and Baby
Girl, 201 Crosson St.
Miss Colie Murphy, Pomaria.
Paul Nelson, 2035 Adelaide St.
Mrs. Ruth Reynolds and Baby
Boy, 2128 Adelaide St.
Mrs. Katheryn Senn, 908 Reid
St.
Ralph Sayi&e, 1224 Glenn St.
Jeff Singley, 419 Werts St.
Mrs. Carrie Singley, Prosperity.
James Stdne, 2100 Adelaide St.
Mrs. Sarah Way, 808 Drewry
St., Atlanta* Ga.
♦ ' < Colored Patients
Hattie Brown, Helena.
Gertrude Dean and Baby Boy,
23dl Emory* .!§£■'
Mattie Houstal, Pomaria.
, I _ i.i« ■ i mi .. jy i.i„ . , f i .1 | i.
“9. We must—ourselves—be pre
pared . to undertake military oper
ations against ynlnerable Com-
Carnell Johnson, Whitmire.
Inez Jones, Silverstreet.
Reena Koon, Pomaria.
Sara McMorris, Newberry.
Eunice Reeder, 716 Wise St.
Sally Jane Sanders, Whitmire.
Martha Sims, Pomaria.
munist regimes.”
MILLS CLINIC PATIENTS
Little Timothy Bundrick, Cha
pin.
Little Frances Farr, Columbia.
Mrs. Dearie Boozer, Prosperity-
Carl Ept^ng, Prosperity.
Miss i*ila ^Martin,
Mrs. Mar? Wright^
Inez Livingston 4ttMi>fwili
Pomaria. _ ’ _ ,.
Mary Elizabeth Kinard, ^pros
perity. • ...V* '• %
Recent Births
STONE
Mr. and Mrs. James Heltom
Stone of D. Spring St., Whitmire,,
announce the birth of a fivw
pound, nine ounce son, Phillip AL
lan, born July 21 at the Newber
ry hospital. Mrs. Stone is thw
former Miss Katie Mae Ammons-
STOUDEMIRE
Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Frank-
Stoudemire of Pomaria are par
ents of a seven pound, two ounce
son, Stucky Joseph, born July 2k
at the local hospital. The mother
is the former Miss Hulda Minnie
Stuck..
; _• SHAW
Mr. and Mrs. Sula Rankin Shaw -
of Rt. l r Saluda announce the
birth cf a six, pound, 14 ounce
daughter, Sandra Lee, on July 2k
at Newberry Hospital. Mrs. Shayr
before marriage was Miss Loie
Geraldine • Jackson.
AWNINGS
For FREE Estimate Without Obligation
CALL 993
Whitaker Floor Coverings
1011 CALDWELL ST. NEWBERRY, S. C.
AGENTS FOR
Ventilated Awning Corp.
IN THE NEWBERRY AREA
4V
iiitites yo uto have the thrill of picking
' W A V*. '
your own luscious, tree-ripened,
V - V*
•,YtV t\
P E A C HE S
Bring your own container. Orchard lo- *
cated at Junction of Highways 391 and
245, two miles from Leesville, three miles
from Batesburg on road to Prosperity.
The homestead of the late Chris M.
Folk located on S. C. Highway No. 19
about half way between Newberry and
Whitmire, S. C.
House in good state of repairs, excellent well and six
pecan trees, modem bath and kitchen, electric hot
water heater and wired for electric stove.
ADDITIONAL LAND IF DESIRED
Contact Miss Lillie Mae Folk
Rt 1, Newberry, S. C., Telephone 753-J1
• • *
heartbeat of
main street
NEWS ON THE HOUR
World, Carolina, Local Sports
Weather
Sportscast 7:35 AM. and 6:35 A.M.
Complete Baseball Scores
—ON—
WKDK
1240 Kc.