The sun. [volume] (Newberry, S.C.) 1937-1972, August 22, 1952, Image 4
THE NEWBERRY SUN
PAGE FOUR
1218 College Street
NEWBERRY, S. C.
PUBLISHED EVERY FRIDAY
By ARMFIELD BROTHERS
Entered as second-class matter December 6. 1937,
at the Postoffice at Newberry, South Carolina, undei
the Act cf Congress of March 3. 1379.
SUBSCRIPTION RATES: In S. C., *1.50 per year
in advance outside S. C., *2.00 per year in advance.
COMMENTS ON MEN AND THINGS
By SPECTATOR
Gov. Byrnes Follows Middle Of Road
Was the South Carolina Democratic Convention a cut
and dried affair? Was the result a pre-arranged agree
ment to endorse the Stevenson-Sparkman ticket? Is the
Stevenson ticket a Truman ticket, conceived and born in
the White House, an offspring of the Trumanites? Well,
if the dominant leaders of the Party in this State call
ed for support of the Stevenson ticket have they changer
heart since 1948? Or, were they merely submerged in
1948 by the onslaughts of Strom Thurmond, George War
ren and others? A review of 1948 will show that the
leaders, who today urge support of the regular ticket,
took no active part for the States Rights campaign of
1948. They have not changed, in effect; they have de
nounced Truman and Trumanism;. but they were regular
in 1948; they are regular today.
What has happened is that the real effectiveness of
1948 is lost because Strom Thurmond and his staff are
not in power.
Certainly every argument for separation in 1948 ap
plies today if we care to think straight.
The water is muddied because Senator Maybank anc
Senator Johnston, in -all good conscience, regard their
chairmanships as of paramount importance. And many
others are equally impelled to support the Stevenson tick
et by reason of some political side-issue, which, to an
outsider, is largely a confusion of thought and a regret
table misconception of the fundamental issue.
South Carolina, as I find the people, are leaning to
Eisenhower.
As to the Convention: The accoustics of the hall are
very bad. As my Spanish friends would say—atrez-atroc-
ious. And many of the speakers were like muffled drums.
Governor Byrnes could hardly be understood by me, though
he is accustomed to speak. Governor Byrnes was sincere in
an attitude of wait-and-see, but he lost the opportunity
to become a leader. Leadership is based on postive con
viction, high courage and unswerving purpose. The Gbv-
ernor adopts a respectable middle-of-the-road position,
but it is not leadership.
Here I should like to speak of the fairness and liberal
ity of the Chairman, John I. Rice. Senator Brown moved
endorsement of the Stevenson ticket, but did not greatly
elaborate. R. M. Kennedy of Camden; Baskin of Lee;
Thomas P. Stoney of Charleston; Douglas McKay of Co
lumbia; Carroll Nance of Cross Hill; George Warren of
Hampton; spoke vigorously against the Stevenson tick
et.
Senators Maybank and Johnston spoke for it. They
don’t like some things, but they will support the ticket.
Conclusion: Here we stand, the South Carolina dele
gates. Everyone wonders where the people stand.
Are the people for^ the office-holders and their chief
supporters? Or, are the people ready to think and act
independently ?
Are we for the loaves and fishes, only, the proverbial
mess of pottage? Or are the people desirous of cleaning
house? Do they rebuke the entrenched mink-coaters, and
percentage favorites? Do they want to win the war in
Korea and live in peace and quiet? Or do they want a
perpetual succession of scares, emergencies, profligate
extravagance and ruinous taxation?
Should Scorn Influence Of Politicans
“Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not de
file himself with the portion of the King’s meat.” So we
read in The Book. The world has applauded Daniel through
the centuries. Then we were taught to admire and praise
John Hampden for refusing to pay an unlawfully levied
tax and, later, for stoutly resisting payment of the ship-
money. Men of that stamp were the prophets and priests
of political liberty.
In the spirit of Daniel, who had defied real lions, spoke
Carroll Nance, Thomas Stoney, George Warren, R. M.
Kennedy and Mr. Baskin, and the Mayor of Mt. Pleasant.
They spoke against the slavery of political bondage; they
spoke with the vigor and conviction of men who have re
solved to take a stand for right and truth, in the face
of prejudice and personal associations. When you reflect
on this well, you will conclude that they are of the stuff
of our early heroes.
Nor would I deny my word of praise to Governor Byrnes.
Considering that he has spent his long life in the hurly
burly of political activity he stood with courage in even
declaring that he was not definitely and definitively com
mitted. Although he would have shown greater and more
heroic stature if he had clearly and forthrightly challenged
all the Convention to follow a course of decision, still he
assumed an attitude of open-mindedness that was far be
yond the attitude and vote of the Convention. The Gover
nor was adroit, sagacious, some-what elusive, but not
hide-bound: he was refreshing, but he missed the op-
BOTH IN SAME STREAM
portunity to be remembered with the great deliverers.
Nothing in recent history has been more refreshing than
the enthusiasm of the people for a thorough house-clean
ing.
Men in office, whether National, State, County or Party,
will not lead against the Party: leadership must come
from those who have no affiliations, no ties, that bind
them to the Party organization; no personal interest that
oeclouds their judgement and confuses the issue. Men on
the outside can look at the problem with clear view and
with a finer spiritual vision: they are not wedded to their
idols, as The Book tells us of Ephraim.
The Trumanites—and Mr. Stevenson—tell us of the
South that we * must get rid of our prejudices, though
founded in traditions of long standing. Let us take a leaf
out of their book and get rid of some political prejudices
of long standing. I admit the inaccuracy of the worn
‘prejudice:’’ we hold certain predelections as a sacred mem
ory of our heroic grandfathers, but the very foundations of
our belief, the rock of our faith,—all have been destroy
ed by the Political Party of our fathers which has today
nothing that our fathers respected.
Ask yourself, each one of you, why have we been rock-
ribbed supporters of the National Democratic Party. You
will think of Reconstruction, of the forcing on us of many
things obnoxious to us. Well, that is today being done,
but by the very Party we have been supporting.
Do we pledge our allegiance to a Party label, regard
less of its platform and practice; or, do we stand foiuv
square for*the traditions and ideals of our people?
Political orators tell us to look at the record. I invite
11
you to look at the record, the record of F.E.P.C., the record
of courts meddling in all our local affairs, of political and
Labor bosses, of strangled business, of ruinous taxation,
of spiritual wickedness in high places. Yes, look at the
record: it is more than loaves and fishes; more than a
mess of pottage that we need; this Nation needs a re-birth,
a re-baptism, a fresh consecration, a refreshment of our
spirit and purpose.
The rank and file of politicians can’t even under
stand that: to them that is all foolishness: but to the un
fettered spirit of free Americans that is the bread of
life, the upsurge of the human spirit seeking something
worth dying for.
Upon the altar of sacrifice; for the cleansing of our
aims; for the enrichment of the human spirit: for the
promotion of righteousness; for the rebuke of spiritual
wickedness in high places—these are foundations of all the
churches of every creed; and these are the intangibles of
life that lift us from the mere gluttony of unrelieved
physical emphasis on the abundance of goods which one
possesses.
We need a revival of wholesome faith.
I do not expect miracles from any man: I do think the
spirit of our people is wholesome and is founded in faith.
If I may quote a noble passage which all recall, “By faith
Abel; By faith Enoch; By faith Noah; By faith Abraham;
By faith Isaac; By faith Jacob; By faith Joseph; By faith
Moses; By faith Gideon, Samson, Samuel, David”—yes and
the Apostles and Martyrs and our fathers and mothers.
What about that faith? “Who through faith subdued
Kingdoms, wrought righteousness, obtained promises, stop
ped the mouths of lions, quenched the violence of fire,
escaped the edge of the sword, out of weakness were made
strong, waxed valiant in fight, turned to flight the armies
of the Aliens.”
I am not preaching: the Word of Life is for us,
though we too often think it belongs only to the preachers
and our Mothers.
The great Apostle summed it up concisely yet beyond dis
pute: “That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of
men, but in the power of God.”
It is this repudiation of the assumed wisdom of men
that I find most exhilarating. If there is anyone whose
influence we should scorn at the moment it is the practical
politician who walks by sight and not by faith; whose spirit
does hot rise above the flesh pots.
In London I heard the great preacher, Dr. Jowett, preach
to the text—not from it—“When the Son of man cometh,
shall He find faith on the earth?” This was the question
of the Master himself? We may answer in the words of
the Ajpostle: “For we walk by faith, not by sight.”
All great leaders have been men of faith, of vision.
To lift the level of life they did not concentrate on the
things of the moment, that blow away like the du^t, but
on the ennoblement and re-dedication of the spirit that
links us .with the Infinite Power.
South’s Oldest Paper
Says It Likes Ike
(The Augusta Chronicle)
The Chronicle breaks tradi
tion to give its support to Dwight
D. Eisenhower, the Republican
nominee for President of the
United States.
Our decision was not made
hastily or precipitately, but was
reached after long, sober, indeed
prayerful, consideration of what
we thought would be the best
course to take in the interest
of our country. The Chronicle is
fully conscious of the fact that
our decision to support the Re
publican candidate breaks pre
cedent. Ours being the oldest
newspaper in the South, we have
been traditionally Democratic in
our political leanings over the
years, and as far as we know this
is the first time in history that
The Chronicle has supported a
Republican for the presidency.
Rut in this election, we can
not see our way clear to do other
wise.
The Chronicle is not joining
the Republican party. We are
an independent newspaper, and
will continue to remain so, but
we expect to do in the future
wh’at we are doing today—^putting
the welfare of our country before
that of any political party.
The most compelling argu
ment in favor of Tke’ Eisenhow
er, as we see it, is that • the
country needs a change in the
administration of its affairs. We
need a fresh approach to the
crucial problems that beset us.
new faces, new men, new ideas.
There is a musty atmosphere
in Washington that needs to be
dispelled.
The national Administration,
under the Democrats, has grown
stale, stodgy, and arrogant, ob
sessed with the idea of seizing
more and more power and author
ity to add to that which has
accured to it during the tw'o
decades that it has uninterrupted
ly held sway.
Although Adlai Stevenson might
be a man of genuine intellecutal
stature, with a capacity for lead
ership, he is a captive of the
same forces which now rule the
Democratic party and which have
done so much harm to the wel
fare of the country. If elected
he would inherit all of the evils,
and he would not be able to get
rid of them because he is be
holden to President Truman, the
Ug city political bosses, the union
czars, and all of the other left
wing elements which combined
to make him the choice of the
Democratic party. He cannot di
vorce himself from their influence.
His candidacy is merely the
window dressing for their cause.
Furthermore, he would be un
able to turn out of office the
members of that vast bureaucracy
which has fastened itself upon
the country, which is entrenched,
and which feels that it has a
vested interest in the govern
ment of the United States. Many
of those who belong to it are
crooked and corrupt; others are
Communist sympathizers, with
their loyalty in doubt. Most if not
all of them believe In the philoso
phy of socialism, are enemies of
the rights, privileges and freedom
of the individual, are proponents
of centralzed government, and
are parties to the free spending
and the waste of the people’s
money.
This crowd has got to be swept
out, and there is no substitute for
a broom in the performance of
this long overdue Job.
We conceive the social revolu
tion which has been going on in
this country for the past twenty
years to be at its peak. It has
run its course, and it is time for
the leveling off process. Yet,
those in control in Washington to
day, those who would continue
In the driver’s seat if the Demo
crats win, are determined to
continue moving toward the left
until the American people, in the
end, are deprived of every sem
blance of freedom, and until
statism is firmly ensconced as a
national party.
We would not be so foolhardy
From Maude Kendall. Hoovem,
Ohio: I remember when I was
just a barefoot little girl I would
watch and wait for our old uncle to
visit us. When I would see him com
ing, I’d always get his low chair for
him to sit in the shade. Then he
would tell us old stories we loved to
hear. He would always have green
leaves in his hat to keep his head
cooL When he started back tor
home. I’d ask, “May I get the leaves
for your hat?'* He'd say, “Yes,
Sissy.’’ So I would run to the woods
and gather leaves and fix them in
his hat. One time I mixed in some
poison ivy. He never came back
for a jfing time and I never gathered
any more leaves for his hat.
From Mrs. N. C. Henshaw, Pomona,
Kans.: I remember when I was
a little girl in Grant county, Kan
sas, only about 50 or 60 years ago.
This being a hot political year, I
am reminded of the red-hot politi
cians of those days. “Sockless
Jerry” and “Prince Hal” and all the
rest. The faithful came for miles
and miles to hear them speak. There
were hay-rack parades, flags and
bunting, glee clubs and fiery
oratory even as now, but without
benefit of radio and television.
Those were the good old days.
From William Agnew, Kanaas City,
Mo.: I remember when neither
party would think its campaign was
complete without a series of torch
light parades all over the land.
From Harvey Johnson, Cincinnati:
I remember when we kids used to
cut out windows in shoe boxes, put
candles in the boxes, make several
boxes into a train, and drag them
along the street at night, playing
they were lighted cars.
From Theodore Mastin, Lexington,
Ky.: My mother used to buy some
sort of pine tar extract, mix it with
sugar and make pine tar syrup with
which to treat us children for coughs
and colds.
(Mail your memories to THE OLD
TIMER. National Weekly Newspa
per Service, 210 Deaplaines St., Chi
cago 6, 111.)
or so stupid as to advocate a re
turn to things as they were
twenty years ago. We are not a
reactionary, or a backward-looker,
and we want to cling to the pro
gress which has been made in the
interest of all.
But it is not progress when
those who make our national
policies flirt with socialism, and
bankruptcy, and pursue a course
which leads inevitably to the de
struction of individual freedom.
“Ike” Eisenhower comes before
the American people as a tried
and trusted leader, a man whose
thinking and actions would not
be snarled up by past associations
with those who have brought dis
honor upon themselves and the
nation, who have brought us to
the brink of socialism or worse,
and who have squandered the peo
ple’s money in a most profligate
manner.
By his words and by his record,
we know him to be a true
patriot, a leader who will hew
to the middle of the road, who
will be inspirational in his lead
ership, who will govern in the
interest of all the people rather
than for the selfish interests of
clamorous groups and minorities
and to the detriment of all other
Americans. Above all, he will
unite the county and put an end
to the senseless and morale-shat
tering campaign of hatred which
pits race against race and class
against class in the ceaseless
warfare now being promoted by
those in authority.
Dwight Eisenhower has said
that he believes in states’ rights
and in individual rights, and we
believe he means what he says.
Make no mistake about it,
America stands at the crossroads
in this presidential election.
Either we are to remain a free
people, or surrender piecemeal
Test Your Intelligence |
Score 10 points for each correct answer in the first six questions:
1. Which of the following famous authors was an American:
—Coleridge - —Conrad . —Wordsworth —Melville
2. The first name of the man who is said to have founded the game
of baseball is:
—Zeke —Abner —Luke —Frank
Congress tried to impeach only one president; who was he:
3.
4.
5.
6.
—Truman * —Monroe —Johnson —Taylor
The capital of Texas is:
—Austin —Dallas —Houston —Galveston
The Allison Trophy is awarded to:
—jet pilots —scholars —dentists —boxers
The vernal equinox is the beginning of:
—Winter —Spring —^Summer —Autumn
Listed below, at left, are four titles of church or state and’opposite
them, mixed up, salutations used in greeting holders of those
titles. Match them scoring 10 points for each correct answer.
(A) Emperor
(B) Duke
(C) Cardinal
<D) Ambassador
0-20
Total your points. A score of
superior; 90-100, very superior.
ANSWERS ON PAGE SIX
—Your Grace
—Your Excellency
—Your Imperial Majesty
—Your Eminence
is poor; 30-00, average; 70-80,
FRIDAY, AUGUST 22, 1962
ashington
e ee e
eeeeeeeeeeeeee
By WALTER SHE AD
G OVERNOR Adlai Stevenson of
Illinois emerged as winner of
the Democratic presidential nomi
nation, the object of a true draft,
much in the same position as Eisen
hower, who became the GOP stand
ard bearer. Both must heal the
wounds of intra-party strife before
either can get down to the real
campaign issues.
There is little doubt that the
Democratic convention picked the
strongest man from its list of can
didates . . . for, as the successful
Governor of Illinois in the heart of
the great mid-west, Stevenson is the
one man best fitted to hold that im
portant sector of the electorate for
the Democrats in November.
It was this great farm belt in 1948
which carried President Truman to
victory ... Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky,
Mixmesota, Ohio, Tennessee, Wis
consin and Missouri . . . with 123
electoral votes.
• • •
Democratic leaders at Chicago
took a calculated risk when they
forced through a loyalty pledge
which delegates must take if they
want to return to the 1956 conven-
tion. They believe that even if they
lose the same four southern states
lost in 1948—South Carolina, Alaba
ma, - Mississippi, and Louisiana,
with 39 votes and possibly Texas or
Virginia, a total of 72 electoral votes
—they will more than overcome that
handicap with a win in either New
York with its 47 votes or Pennsyl
vania with 35 and New Jersey with
16. It will be remembered that the
Democratic ticket would have car
ried New York and probably New
Jersey In 1948 had it not been for
the splinter party headed by Henry
A. Wallace.
One obvious result from both con
ventions is that the southern states
ara to become political battlefields
in this election for the first time
sinca the civil war. For it is ap
parent that Eisenhower has strength
in the South far exceeding any Re
publican candidate in a generation.
It will mean the birth of a two-
party system in the South. In the
Democratic convention the dele
gates told the southern leaders
such as Senator Harry Byrd of
Virginia, Governor James Byrnes
of South Carolina and Governor
Robert Kennon, of Louisiana:
“You art here by suffrance of the
other delegates of this convention,
and you cannot participate in the
nomination of a ticket in this con
vention %nd then go home and use
the Democratic party label for any
other ticket.” That’s what the loy
alty pledge means which was
adopted as a permanent rule of
the convention.
It is expected to effectively pre
vent those states from doing what
they did in 1948—namely putting
the Dixiecrat ticket, or any other
ticket under the party emblem of
the “rooster” and forcing write-in
votes for the nominees of the con
vention.
• • •
These southern leaders are mad,
they were humiliated, and for this
reason the administration will ML
to it that for the first time in
tory a real national campaign
be conducted in southern states.
The Republican convention
whipped southern states in lin
adoption of the “fair play*’ rule and
addition of the incentive rule on the
national committee giving
recognition and membership
those states which get in the
ning column. It means
patronage hungry “rotten
and “absentee landlord”
Republican leaders in the
ended and that if southern
want equal representation
national committee with
states, they must get out
for the honor, work to win.
• • •
Action of both conventions
an end to the denial of a
vote by both parties insofar i
national ticket is concert
southern states. On the GOP i
they have everything to
nothing to lose by their disci
action. And as we have poi
the Democrats believe they
more in the north and western i
than they lose in the south
they do lose any southern states.
m
'
A N EDITORIAL entitled “The
■ Parable of the Runt” which
appeared in the New Castle Cour
ier-Times, New Castle, Indiana,
carries a message that is worthy
of consideration throughout the na
tion. It reads:
“Once upon a time in a neigh
borhood not far from here there was
a runt who liked to play ball with
the other fellows on the corner lot.
“He was perhaps a year, or so
younger, his short legs didn’t carry
him so fast around the bases, and
his arms were not so long in reach
ing fgr the balls.
“Now, there was nothing wrong
with his vocal facilities, and he com
plained long and loud to the other
boys that he was being treated un
fairly. He kept at them until they
finally agreed that he should have
i four strikes at bat as ra sort of
handicap.
“Well, the summer passed and
other summers came and went, and
the runt grew into a big, strapping
6-footer. His arms and legs were
as long as the other boys’ and he
could hit the ball as well as any of
them, but do you think he would
give up his four strikes at bat?
“No, sir. That was his by right.
“He is a grown man now. The
corner lot has a building on it, and
there aren’t any more ball games
there, but he’s still demanding four
strikes at bat.
“ T Ie’s a businessman who seeks
special privilege from th^ legisla
ture.
“He’s a laborer who w.mu» pay
for days he doesn't work.
“He’s a farmer who tp'r-s Gov
ernment checks for things
doesn’t raise.
“Life Is just a big lollipop,
privileges and no respo
“Like the runt, we forget that
every privilege, somebody must
sume a responsibility.
“A home in which everybody
to eat but nobody wants to wo
headed for financial and mori
bankruptcy. So is such a nation.
“Only as we render services and
accept responsibility in our home
are we entitled to its privileges, and
it is the same in any group; the
place where we work, the co
nity in which we live, and the
at large.
“Isn’t it about time we began to
appreciate the things that other
folks do for us; the teacher who en
dures and inspires our children; the
boss who spends a lot of sleepless
nights making the businesses go
that provides us with a good job;
the employe who is proud of his
work and sees it through; the wife
who puts up with all our
peculiarities and binds our wi
at the end of a discouraging day;
a God who pours out his mercy be
yond anything we deserve.-
“Only as we are thankful for all
that is done for us and accept our
responsibilities shall we overcome
the childish notion that we are en
titled to four strikes at bat and
stand before God and our own con
science as a man in all that the
word implies.”
• • •
From the Canton Independent-
Sentinel, Canton, Pa.:
“Life has no secrets that a teen
ager can’t read about in some of
the magazines offered for sale.”
Expanded Journalism
Program Added To
Winthrop Curriculum
ROCK HILL, Aug. 19 — Con
struction now in progress at Win
throp College will result in mod
ern and convenient facilities for
its program in journalism next
school year.
and by degrees those rights and
freedoms which were handed
down to us by our forefathers and
which have been preserved until
the Socialist experimenters be
gan to take them from us, one
by one.
We believe that by electing
Dwight Eisenhower as President,
the American people can regain
those freedoms which have been
taken from them, and preserve
those which have not yet been
lost.
These are the chief reasons
which have compelled The Chroni
cle to bfeak precedent and advo
cate the candidacy of “Ike” Eisen
hower. We call upon those who
feel as we do to join in the good
tight.
Kenneth D. Frick
Gets Scholarship
From Univ. Of S. C.
The award of 26 scholarships
for the fall term of 1952 to stu
dents of the University of South
Carolina was announced today by
Professor K. L. F. deGravellines,
director of student activities.
Kenneth David Frick, of New
berry, is recipient of one of the
26 scholarships.
The scholarships are given to
students who show unusual prom
ise of creditable scholastic
achievement, Prof. deGravellines
said. They include both upper
classmen and student entering for
the first time, and are subject to
renewal.
Located in adjoining rooms on
the ground floor of the Admini
stration Building will be a well-
equipped radio studio, journalism
classroom-writing laboratory, stu
dent newspaper office, news ser
vice office, photography studio,
and two darkrooms.