The sun. [volume] (Newberry, S.C.) 1937-1972, June 06, 1952, Image 4
PAGE FOUTl
THE NEWBERRY SUN
FRIDAY, JUNE 6, 1952
T
1218 College Street
NEWBERRY, S. C.
PUBLISHED EVERY FRIDAY
By ARMFIELD BROTHERS
Entered as eecond-claas matter December 6. 1937,
at the Poatoffice at Newberry, South Carolina, under
the Act of Congreei of March 3, 1879.
SUBSCRIPTION RATES: In S. C., 31.50 per year
in advance outaide S. C., 82.00 per year in advance.
COMMENTS ON MEN AND THINGS
By SPECTATOR
Yielding To Prisoners Unthinkable
Are we Americans losing our pep? Have we become soft
and flabby? In recent weeks we have had prison riots at
home and war-prisoner riots in Korea. And we negotiate
with the prisoners! Anyone who has ever had to main
tain dicipline knows that he must always “Command the
situation he must not be coerced by prisoners. If a
military officer or a prison officer is not ready to give
his life, if need be, he is not the man for the job, for that
is his job. The old-time school master had some iron in
his blood, too; he had to be in full command—and he was.
I find it unthinkable that we should yield to rebellious
prisoners. Even if the American General who was a cap
tive had been killed in the action our army should have
taken those prisoners in hand beyond any peradventure.
Indiscipline in no new incident in schools, colleges, or
armies. Revolts, mutinies, stubborn resistance—all that
is old, well known since the world began. But bowing and
scraping and coddling—that marks the weakling; it shows
a timid spirit where strength and resolution are needed.
Sometimes a class has to be disciplined; sometimes a stu
dent or a hundred students may have to be expelled; but
the present-day habit of yield, yielding, surrendering, is
making us ridiculous in the eyes of the world and craven
in our own eyes.
■ Many years ago The Citadel shipped (expelled) many
Seniors because they “broke garrison”—left barracks after
hours, let themselves out -of the windows with sheets, as
I recall. Well, now% “breaking garrison is nothing heinous,
is it? It doesn't indicate a case of turpitude that makes
one think of the devouring flames of the infernal regions.
No, indeed! But discipline is discipline. If we don’t want
boys to become, men let us send them where milk and
honey will be served after they’ve been affectionately tuck
ed in bed. And in the handling of men one must have iron
in his glove though it may lo^k like velvet.
Haven’t you heard of the Sheriffs who walked into the
very jaws of death to arrest their man? That was their
duty. I like something I heard of my old Chief, President
Leguia of Peru. During one of his terms he was seized
in the Palace by revolutionists and brought out to the
Plaza de Armas (public square) the guards on the Palace
roof feared to shoot lest they kill the President, but they
stood ready to shoot. The revolutionists said to President
Leguia “Tell them not to shoot, or they’ll kill you.” That
spunky little gentleman called out to the guards “Do your
duty.” Another time Mr. Leguia was virtually dragged
from the Palace and carried about four blocks and order
ed to sign a resignation as President. With all the guns
pointing his way he delayed and delayed, adjusting his
glasses and reading slowly the wording of the paper. When
he was prodded he said “I'll sign, but the wording isn’t
good Spanish; revise it, so I can afford to sign.” He was
bidding for time. Then came youtig' Lieutenant Gomez
with a platoon. The revolutionists fired point blank and
President Leguia and Lieutenant Gomez fell to the ground.
Not dead, however, but just prudently. That grand little
gentleman rose and held out his hand and said “Rise, Cap
tain Gomez”! Men were men in those days! That was
before the days of nice, easy young fellows in Washington
serving souffles to prisoners and issuing tailored suits!
Years ago a distinguished Methodist Minister visited an
institution for the mentally afflicted. As he went through
a ward one of the inmates approached and asked: “Is the
pomposity of the pompous unconditioned?” The great
preacher tactfully replied: “Well, that depends.” We might
ask today “Is the folly of the foolish unconditioned?”
Truman’s Steel Talk Misleading
Lying as a fine art: Someone should write a book on
the subject. We find all sorts of statements, misstate
ments, distortions and perversions, but you can’t pin any
one down; he is all things to all men but nothing to any
body if that evasion or outright denial will best serve his
purpose, or suit his mood.
Some people go off half-cocked; some talk through their
hats; others perjure themselves without hats, and even
when bald-headed.
An illuminating instance of entirely misleading talk was
the remark of President Truman that the Steel Companies
were “making 319 a ton profit on steel.”
It seems that they pay in taxes about nine or twelve dol
lars of that. The President should know that; but he
should avoid slamming around; it is not part of his busi
ness to denounce any taxpayer. There is no such thing as
a profit before taxes; the industries should stop talking
such nonsense: the profit is only after all costs and charges
have been deducted. That includes taxes. Taxes are just
as much a charge on the product, just as much an item
of cost, as labor or the raw material-used in manufacture.
lop Priority
The Russians are giving us examples of loose talk and
utter falsehoods. They say anything, with complete dis
regard for the truth, and the public, in part, believes
what it reads and hears. We Americans have picked that
up and we, too, have issued statements that show that
we are becoming very apt followers of Ananias. We are
developing a practice of using press agents to make some
thing sound like the truth. We can scarcely believe the
reports' that are issued because they have been- doctored
and sugared, or, else, much of the essence has been strain
ed out or drained off. One group of our citizens will
shout that those in opposition are liars, thieves, scoundrels;
then the other side will declare that the first crowd are
just so many Reds, pinks, Stalingites, and enemies of the
public.
We are losing our sense of proportion, our sense of fair
ness; everybody else is not only grievously wrong but
villainously wrong, deeply imbrued in the blood of the op
position. What’s the matter with us? Can’t we have dif
ferences of opinion in mutual respect and forbearance, in
love and charity and in brotherly compassion?
Something* New From Coal
Chemistry is a rich contributor to our National wealth
and greatness; it gives us something new frequently and
then that starts a great industry, employing thousands of
people. It does more; it gives us a product that plays a,
part in the American plan of living.
Coal may yield many more items to our standard of
living, but something new has just come from coal, after
seventeen years of research, patient work of the labora
tory technicians, assiduously studying, analyzing, compar
ing, thinking, thinking all the time.
Powdbred coal with hydrogen gas has given us some
thing different.
Here is part of the story:
“The new plant is important because it points the way
to a change in the whole economics of the chemical in
dustry by providing a potentially large and cheap supply
of additional raw material from coal.
It will take years—and heavy investment—before it de
rives important profits from this venture.
This development offers a potential shift in the eco
nomics of the local industry, as well, slowly, over the
years, coal may find that its depressed market as a fuel
is supplemented by an expanding market as a raw ma
terial.
The present coal tar chemical industry is based on
tar made in the by-product coke ovens that feed the steel
industry. Its supplies are thus limited by the rate of op
eration and the rate of growth of the steel industry.
At first steel grew fast and the chemical industry was
small. But more recently coke production has been grow
ing only about 3% to 5% yearly, and there is no guaran
tee that growth based on the current burst of steel mill
expansion will long continue.
Meanwhile chemical needs have been skyrocketing. For
example, stryene, used for synthetic rubber and plastics,
which is made from coal-based benzene, has been growing
in use at the rate of 37% yearly, and benzene was in
critically short supply last year. Consumption of soap
less soaps, partly based on coal tar, has been mounting at
the rate of 30% yearly. Phenol, used in drugs and plas
tics, has been growing at the rate of 14% yearly.
The chemical industry therefore has long realized that
some day it would have to cut itself loose from its de-<
pendence on steel. This, of course, has happened with
the development of the huge petro-chemicals industry,
mainly on the Gulf Coast.
However this hasn’t entirely solved the problem because
it is much too expensive at present to make certain ‘coal
tar’ chemicals like benzene out of oil or gas, though it is
being done. There is also the long range prospect that
natural gas will go up in price. ‘We can’t afford to pay
as much for gas as housewives can for cooking,’ say the
men. . \
The new coal-eating plant, stands among the huge
plants which made over 60% of all the butadiene that went
into synthetic rubber during the last war.
It takes coal from the company’s mines, and grinds it
to a fine powder. This is mixed with oils dervied from
earlier cycles of the manufacturing process, to make a
paste, and then passed into huge converters, looking like
(continued on page nine)
To Such A Grand Organization
Noble Shriners And Their Visitors
In Spring Ceremonies of Hejaz Temple-in
Newberry
Newbeny Federal
Savings & Loan
ASSOCIATION