The sun. [volume] (Newberry, S.C.) 1937-1972, September 08, 1950, Image 4
THE NEWBERRY SUN
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1950
.
1218 Collegre Street
NEWBERRY, S. C.
0. F. Arm field
Editor and Publisher
PUBLISHED EVERY FRIDAY
Entered as second-class matter December 6, 1937,
at the Postoffice at Newberry, South Carolina, under
the Act of Congress of March 3, 1879.
SUBSCRIPTION RATES: In S. C., $1.50 per year
in advance outside S. C., $2.00 per year in advance.
KEEP YOUR FEET
ON THE GROUND
Excessive buying is gradually
diminishing. With a little re
flection it is easy to see why.
Concern over the grim head
lines of recent weeks simply
caused a lot of people to lose
perspective. Indisputable facts
meant little—such as booming
consumer goods production and
soaring agricultural statistics.
Meat is a good illustration. Ab
normal demand has showed up
some prices but there is no
shortage. Within a matter of
weeks the biggest pork crop in
history will be moving to market.
And beef supplies are abundant.
Meat consumption is one of
the best indications of a nation’s
living standard. Here again the
figures should help wary con
sumers get their feet back on
the ground. The average family
of four in this country eats
eleven pounds of meat a week
which takes about five hours of
the breadwinner's pay. In Rus
sia. by way of contrast, one
would have to work 35 hours to
pay for the same amount of
meat, if were available.
One very good reason why we
have not had serious shortages
of necessities in the United
States is our free competitive
system under which all business,
big and little, operates. Where-
ever there is a consumer need,
it immediately becomes good
business for someone to meet
that need at a competitive price.
While meat cannot be manu
factured like automobiles and
toothbrushes, meat producers and
packers are compelled by the
same natural laws governing
other free enterprise to do their
utmost to satisfy consumer de
mand. -
These are some of the rea
sons why housewives in our
country do not need to scramble
for goods. There is more than
enough of everything. Practicl-
Ty any other nation in the world
would consider itself well off in
deed if it had half the abundance
of this country.
at;
FREEZER LOCKER Paper Free
zer Containers, Freezer Jars,
also regular Fruit Jars, Tops,
Rubbers, Ice Cream Cones, Oyst
er Containers, Drinking Cups,
Paper Plates, Spoons, Forks.
R. Derrill Smith and Son, Inc.
Wholesale Grocers, Newberry, S.
C. 18-1t.
WHERE DO YOU STAND?
Basically there are but two
philosophies. One sets out the
citizen above the state—that is
what we have had in this coun
try under our representative
from of government. The other
sets the state above the citizen
and results in the oppression
that has bedeviled the human
race throughout the ages. Cur
rently, socialism and communism
represent the ultimate in the
latter philosophy. That is why
present-day planners who advo
cate greater and greater govern
ment domination over the indi
vidual avoid these names like
the plague. They promote gov
ernment ownership of industry,
they endorse compulsory medical
taxes, they tour the country
at the taxpayers’ expense in sup
port of Federal power “authorit
ies” and constantly harp on the
theme that the capabilities of
private industry are inadequate.
Their program from start to
finish is socialism, and yet if it
is so defined they cry “libelous.”
Regardless of the sensitivities
of the disguised socialist, it is of
the greatest importance to define
his aims. If this country is to
abandon the system of govern
ment upon which k was founded,
let’s do it deliberately, not by
subterfuge. In an outstanding
editorial the American Druggist
declares: “Up to now no im
portant politician has openly
asked us to choose between de
mocracy and socialism or some
other kind of statism, but we
are being urged to support cani-
dates for Congress who favor po
litical programs that definitely
express much more faith in gov
ernment control than in the in
dividual character and ability of
the average citizen.
“If we have come to the con
clusion that the individual pro
blems of most people are too
much for them, and that the
only hope is in a benevolent
government, then let us set up
a super government... . but let
us do it with our eyes open. On
the other hand, if we still be
lieve that the only real security
for any citizen is his individual
freedom of opportunity, it is our
conviction that the time has
come to stand up and declare
ourselves...”
IMPRESSED WITH
OUR MILITARY
During the first weeks of the
Korean war Americans were
stunned by the tragic inade<
quacy of our forces and equip
ment. Many felt a personal re
sponsibility for the needless loss
of life. It was a healthy am
well-founded reaction which wil
lead to correction of mistake^
and weeding out of inept of
ficials. There are already en
couraging signs of improvement.
John Osborne, Time and Life
senior correspondent in the Pa
cific, writes: “The American ef
fort and the American soldier
in Korea are magnificent. Doubt
less we could and should have
been better prepared. But..
today we have in Korea more
men and more arms than we sent
to the invasion of North Africa
in November of 1942, eleven
months after Pearl Harbor.”
Intelligence reports received
in Washington indicate that the
evident military ability of thd
country to cope with the com
munists in Korea has impressed
the countries of Southeast Asia.
Applications for communist party
membership are dwindling and
pictures of the communist lead
er Mao Tse-tung are disaffpearing
from shop windows. Even more
encouraging is the opinion of
authorities on the mystery of
why Russia has not moved into
outher areas while the United
States has its hands full in
Korea. They point out that we
have in readiness, prepared to
strike with hair-trigger swiftness,
a fleet of more than 2,000 Ain
Force bombers able to carry
atom bombs within a matter of
hours to every major city in
Russia. And we have the
bombs to do the job. If the
opinion of these authorities is
correct, this factor, plus an in
dustrial production potential of
near astronomical proportions,
has checked Russia for the time
being.
Another element of strength
that is not fully appreciated is
the growing efficiency and pro
ductive capacity of American
agriculture. Food is a mighty
weapon and our farms are pro
ducing it in record quantities.
The magazine Country Gentle
man recently described what has
been happening on the farm:
“Ever since the end of World
War II, farmers have been turn
ing out, year after year, nearly
a fourth more than in the year
of Pearl Harbor, and it’s hard
to picture the peaks to which
farm output might be pushed
under necessity. Leading agri
cultural scientists now believe
that the output of the farm
plant of the United States could
be doubled by putting to use all
the production knowledge we
now have....
“Significantly, the great up
surge in farm production during
and since World War II came
about with only a minor increase
in- acreage harvested.. .Further
more, the gains were made in a
period when farmers had fewer
workers than prewar.”
With all our prodigality, we
are demonstrating as never be
fore the achievements attainable
by free men. It is these achieve
ments that are now being felt in
Korea and that are earning the re
spect of other nations—includ
ing Russia.
COMMENTS ON MEN AND THINGS
BY SPECTATOR
A-t Key’s
on base FLAT WALL
PAINT uuiUtluU
JduxtiSuf, JlooJz!
iM
I '
4
\
\
l
W'
mm
Kl
• 50 Shades from Pastels to Deep Tones
• Insist on ATHEY’S
Manufactured by
IHC C. M. ATHEY PAINT CO., BAITIM0RE 30, M0.
You can't hurt an A they surface!
m
m
■m
FLAT WALL PAINT
R. M. Lominack Hardware
The ladies are full of sur
prises, as you may know. As I
was leavingi, a telephone in
Charleston a lady at the desk
said “lunderstand that you are a
teacher, so won’t you explain
something to me?’’ That car
ried a fine tribute to teachers—•
that we must know quite a lot.
However, my teaching days are
over and I no longer can claim
the learning and wisdom that
the lady credited to the teaching
profession. Now here is what
she wants to know: Why we per
mit Communists to hold public
positions in the United States.
I wonder about that, too. If
any one can enlighten us we
should be grateful.
By the way, what is a Com
munist, or who is a Communist?
We take for granted that the
Russians are Communists, though
only six million Bolshevists gov
ern a hundred and eighty million
people. The ruling Bolshevists
introduced and imposed Com-
unism. Whether most Russians
are Communists “at heart” I do
not know. The rank and file of
Russians, the common men,
never had a chance under the
Czars, so they must think they
are more prosperous today. To
day they are told that they, the
people, own everything. That
may sound encouraging, but it is
all sound, no substance.
In practice, Communism means
that the Government is supreme
that the Government owns every
thing and controls everybody.
The Government can fix wages
and prices, for the Government
is the Boss. The government can
tell you where to work, how to
work and fix the hours. The Gov
ernment can tell you where you
may go, or whether you may go
anywhere. The Government con
trols the newspapers andl the
radio; it feeds the people just
what the Government wants
them to know or to think. If
you remember your Bible you
will recall the words “As a man
othinketh in his heart so is he.”
The Communists feed his mind
and that is what his mind works
on.
What is wrong with that? Is
n’t it true that my neighbor may
be more capable of runing my
business than I am? Frequently
that is true. And certainly many
people are more capable of rear
ing children than the fathers and
mothers. Still you do not ad
vocate sending all children to
orphanges, do you? And isn’t
it true that we build men on the
plan of trial and error? Many
of our greatest men failed in one
business, though they succeed
ed later.
In very truth a man is a won
derful creation; no one can mea
sure the possibilities of his mind
and purpose. When you look
at a little boy you may see a
second Edison, a second Henry
Ford, a second Luther Burbank;
or he may become an industrious
and honorable citizen who is of
that “noble peasantry, a coun
try’s pride, which once destroyed
cannot be supplied.” Of course
we have no peasantry; all Ameri
cans are equal before the law, as
they are equal before the' God
of their fathers.
America respects the dignity
of the individual: we are not
massed or herded except by our
own misguided conduct. We ob
serve that our religion teaches
us that “Every one of us shall
give an account of himself to
God.” The Maker of the Uni
verse, the Father of the faith
ful, the Mighty God, treats with
us an individuals. No man can
plead his Mother’s saintliness or
his father's righteousness in de
fense of himself; And no man is
charged with the corruption of
others unless he failed to do his
mrt in preventing or correcting
it. So we stand alone each man
before his Creator.
A further compelling consider
ation is that Jehovah lets us
choose our own path and go our
separate way. How, then, shall
we regard the foolishness of any
man, or group or Political Party,
that would disregard the splendid
possibilities of an individual and
impose on his mind and conduct
a rule that violates the over-all
plan.of the Almighty?
Now as to the question of
the lady of Charleston: It seems
to me, as it does to her, that
since a Communist believes in
the overthrow of our form of gov
ernment he should not be in a
position of any kind in that gov
ernment.
I know that many of our peo
ple say that our Constitution
guarantees freedom of religion
and freedom of speech: that be
cause of these freedoms a man
has a right to be a Communist
and to teach Communism in this
Country. The right to pracitce
religion would not permit any
oractice that offended our sense
it decency. So there Is no ab
solute right. Nor should free
dom of speech include a right
to plan the destruction of the
form of government of this coun
try. It is more than a form of
government which is at stake:
it is a manner of living, a way
of life; and that way of life is
the very. foundation of America.
No government has a right to
control a man’s thinking, but no
man should be put in position to
destroy the institutions of the
land, in the language of the
street. No man should try to
destroy a Nation’s way of life by^
using that very freedom to stab*
it in the back.
Russia, having repudiated God,
we may have to answer for hav
ing relations with her. The read
er of the Scriptures finds many
instances of Jehovah’s fiery
wrath against His people be
cause they made alliances with
the heathen for military pur
poses, rather than to invoke the
guidance and power of the Most
High. I do not apologize for
this Illustration: religion is the
most vital concern of each one
of us. We may think so today,
or we may wait until the son
rowing family comes for a last
look, and the doctor counts the
pulse as life ebbs to eternity.
We can’t escape it, though in the
flush of youth, and the pride and
arrogance of earthly success, we
forget that the cemetery is full
of men who once were bubbling
with ambition.
America is to be invited to
continue to pour out billions of
dollars all over the world. The
so-called Marshall Plan, under
which America has been sending
billions to Europe, always seem
ed to me to be a wild, fantastic
dream that would do nothing of
permanent good. We set our
selves up as • missionaries of the
dollar, neglecting our own Coun
try and our people in order to
send billions of our tax money
to sustain Europe. We also
dreamed that we were putting
Communism to rout.
We would have succeeded so
much beter by using common-
sense. I’m reminded of the
Spanish expression: “Sentido
comun: el mas raro de todos losf
sentidos’*—Common sense: the
rarest of all the senses. It isn’t
very ‘Common,” is It? By com
monsense we mean that sort of
horsesense that seems to be born
in a man, or which he acquired
by dealing with men and keeping
his eyes wide open. Perhaps it
was due in a measure to associat
ing with horses in the old days.
Certainly some drivers ot cars
have no horsesense, though they
do get pretty “horsey,” some
times. But commonsense, or
horsesense, is a pratical judge
ment that is not based on books.
The old-timers were inclined to
sneer at those of us who look
ed up everything in a book, and
believed only what we saw in
print.
Well, where am I, now? ’ Ex
tolling commonsense. If we htid
spent on our military forces half
of what we’ve wasted in Europe
our Army, Navy and Air Force
would command such respect
that we could maintain peace
throughout the world without
fighting. Of-course the dreamers
and wasters in Washington would
have had just that much more
to throw away. I do not say that
'idly; assuredly I say it sorrow-*
fully, for if our campaign in
Korea is a measure of our Ad
ministration’s ability I should
wonder what ten billions more
would have provided. After
speding 400 billions on the Sec
ond World War—just four years
ago—and after spending fifty bil
lions since, we seem to have too
little to crush that litle war.
t^et me quote the latest
scheme to throw away the
American taxpayers’ money:
“London—The British govern
ment is ready to spring a new
globalaid scheme on the Ameri
can taxpayer.
The outlines of the plan are
contained in an official state
ment on foreign and domestic
issued yesterday by the Labor
Party’s National Executive Com
mittee—whose decisions are al
most always tantamount to gov
ernment policy.
The document proposes that
a new long-term program of
“mutual” economic aid be drafted
now by the free nations of the
world to succeed the Marshall
Plan when it ends in 1952.
Several leaders of the Labor
government. Including Prime
Minister Clement Atlee, are mem
bers of the committee which
drafted the plan. Party Secre
tary Morgan Phillips says he
anticipates the government will
take the initiative in launching
it.
‘It’s British initative with
American money,’ remarks one
observer here.
The United States asked for it,
however. When Secretary of
State Dean Acheson was in Lon
don for the foreign ministers’
conference in May. he practically
assured Western Europe the flow
of dollars would not stop in 1952.
Yesterday’s British statement
the first official European pro^
gram for keeping the dollars
flowing. All the same, first
American reaction here was chil
ly. Few U. 8. officials hare yet
had time to study what the Lab-
oritles call ‘A World Plan for
Mutual Aid.’ But those that hare
note that the U, 8. is the only
country able to supply large
amounts for such a program, and
that its resources are now go
ing to be heavily taxed by the
newly blossoming rearmament
program and expanded military
aid not envisioned by Mr. Ache-
son this spring. These are skip
ped over in the Labor Party
statement. Some U. S. observers
also wryly recall that during
World War II the British used
the phrase ‘mutual aid’ for the
same thing Americans referred
to as ‘lend-lease.’ However gen
eral, the British scheme is clear
ly a bid to the U. S. to pour out
a steady stream of dollars to
finance the world’s economic
needs. The party statement
specifies that all non-communist
rations ‘would be expected to
contribute to the world plan ac
cording to their ability.’’
We cannot depend on Britain’s
Socialistic government for great
help; France is weak and wob
bling; Italy is worse. We need a
strong German police force to re
sist Russia and we need a strong
Japanese police force to
Chinese Communism. Am
can’t fight the world alone.
America were really a
consecrated it could win: but
hovah expects us to use .the
telligence He endowed us
Our present difficulty has. _
out of our stupid leadership,
gave Russia China and bar
Korea and told the world
would not defend Korea a
mosa!
m
: .J.
■
Flowers and Gifts for All Occasio
r* a btitu’q
Day Phone 719 — Night 6212
MR FAR
We have just completed the most modern system for drying your
v.
We also have installed more cleaning equipment. We are no
sition to give you a fine sample and turn out. Give us a chance to pr
the above facts. ' ' v
’ ' "lH
We will pay you the highest market price for your cotton seed. We
W -
have hulls and meal at all times. We also carry a complete line of fertilizer
for your faM grain and pastures. PHONE 118
.
The Southern
At-
'*******w**m***s****""" / ‘
//////////M
////////////#
/////////mty
////////////■
//////////*!*
y///////////*
/////////""A
/////////////Sr
Advance-Design TRUCKS
Prst/itdema/Hr\.f?i&fa tv/ud...Prsf/n str/ts
Chevrolet's Valve-in-Head engines can do
more work per gallon of gasoline con
sumed than any other make of their ca
pacity. You can't beat Chevrolet for low
cost of ownership, operation, and upkeep
—or for high resale value. Chevrolet trucks
work for more owners on more jobs, every
day, than any other make. So come see us.
We’ve got Just the truck you wantl
v im
-tM
Kemper Motor Company
TELEPHONE 988 1 NEWBERRY, S. C.