The sun. [volume] (Newberry, S.C.) 1937-1972, June 25, 1948, Image 2
THE NEWBERRY SUN, NEWBERRY, S. C.
Washington Digest,
Reciprocal Trade Is Vital
To Well-Being of the World
By BAUKHAGE
Netcs Analyst and Commentator
WASHINGTON.—Despite the spirited battle over exten
sion of the reciprocal trade agreement authority, nothing which
even its best friends could hope to do about it would be defini
tive, for everyone knew from the start that final action must
be postponed until next year.
Reciprocal trade agreements have been a definite part of our foreign
trade policy for 14 years. If they were of any value in the past, they are
of even more value now. But with an election a little more than four
months off and congress trying to break a log jam of legislation, lengthy
debate on the subject was impossible.
Putting it backwards, the recip
rocal trade agreement policy is
this: If a country is prevented by
a high tariff waU from seUing to us,
it can’t get the
dollars to buy
from us. Or, if
the country has
borrowed money
from us, it can’t
get the dollars
to pay us back.
That’s what hap-
pened after
World War I,
and the break
down in foreign
trade was one of
the great factors
in bringing on depression.
But that isn’t the only thing that
tariff walls do. They tend to force
isolationism, extreme nationaUsm
on a country and behind the tariff
walls, as ex-Secretary of State Cor
dell Hull used to say so often, grow
the roots of war.
Secretary of State Marshall
stated that the Gearhart bill
would destroy the substance of
the reciprocal trade theory, a
theory which is not only the cor
nerstone of our general foreign
trade poUcy, but the principle
which we have insisted must be
foUowed by nations participating
In the European recovery pro
gram.
The secretary said that “only the
shadow of the original act would be
preserved in the substitute bill pro
posed by Representative Gearhart,
while its substance would be de
stroyed.” And he added: “I think
our national interests would be bet
ter preserved to permit the trade
agreements act to expire than to
permit H.R. 6556 to be enacted.’’
He pointed out that any serious
weakening of the trade agreements
act at this critical period in world
affairs would "almost certainly be
regarded by other countries not
only as a surrender of our leader
ship in the international economic
field, but as a repudiation of much
that has been accomplished under
our leadership In that field.”
Presumably he meant this:
When we agreed to the European
recovery plan (E.C.A.), one ef the
things we emphasised, demanded
in fact, was that the countries re
ceiving our aid would have to
break down tariff barriers against
each other and the rest of the
world. We knew there couldn’t
be economic recovery if there was
not a free flow of world trade.
Even before the E.C.A. was ever
thought of—since 1934, as a matter
of fact—by vigorously pursuing the
reciprocal idea, by concluding re
ciprocal trade treaties with so
many countries (we have them
with all but six or seven of the
Marshall plan participants) we have
encouraged the world to reduce tar
iff walls. Thus it would hardly
seem consistent suddenly to reverse
ourselves and go back to the old
days of high tariff economic isola
tionism.
The measure as the house pre
sented it had another drawback in
the eyes of Secretary Marshall and
supporters of his point of view. The
bill would force the President either
to accept the recommendations of
the federal tariff commission, on ad
justments above or below a certain
bracket or submit them to a con
gressional veto. That sounds rea
sonable in theory, but what it does
is to smash absolutely the whole
basis for reciprocal trade negotia
tion.
A nasty little joker in the meas
ure stating that tariff commission
recommendations must be made on
the principle of protecting the spe
cial interests concerned revealed
the Intent of its framers. That pro
vision would destroy the purpose of
negotiation by removing trade
agreements from the field of the
“general good” and narrowing them
down to a question of whether the
particular industry is to be pro
tected from competition. Thus, not
only would international relations
and conditions have to be ignored
entirely, but broaS national inter
ests as well.
Secretary Marshall used strong
words In criticizing this danse
when he said: “The bill. In effect,
makes pure protection the sole
criterion for tariff action.”
Very few groups outside of the
big Industries which want to keep
down foreign competition oppose
the reciprocal trade program. The
great majority of the chambers of
commerce are for it. Earl Shreve,
national president of the chamber
ef commerce, has said that any
“restrictions on or crippling of the
trade agreements program would
have very undesirable repercus
sions. Discontinuance or impair
ment would destroy consistency in
United States policy and would
undermine world confidence.”
Former Republican presidential
candidate Alfred E. Landon came
out in favor of the three-year ex
tension of the trade agreements act
as urged by the administration. He
said that failure to extend the act
would be contrary to the Republican
policy plank of 1944.
Frequent public opinion polls
have shown that the majority of
the people favor trade treaties.
In fact, persons who know what
trade ireatles are vote better than
eight to one to retain them.
Tm no economic expert, but all
I have ever read or heard about
the old high protective tariff de
bates, tfte experience under the
Smoot-Hawley bill, the post-World
War I debt repudiation and depres
sion would seem to indicate that
the high tariff idea should and
would be dead as a dodo.
If not, it means we spin the wheel
backward to the grand old days of
high tariffs which killed foreign
trade, made it impossible for for
eign countries to sell us goods and
spend their money here, or to pay
back the money they owed us —
simply to protect certain private
Interests.
• • •
This Convention
Is Different
As the Republicans swing into ac
tion with the greatest hope they
have had for electing a president
since the fifth birthday of this
year’s first voters, there are a num
ber of striking contrasts to be noted
between this convention in Phila
delphia and former GOP conclaves.
One big contrast is in the size
of the audience which actually will
behold the speakers as they step
forward onto the rostrum. In 1940,
some 10,000 people not actually in
the hall witnessed the convention.
Two television cameras mir
rored the scenes to a fairly select
audience, some of it composed of
persons fortunate enough to share
the hospitality of the Railroad
club in the same building as the
hail. There one could escape the
sound and fury, the glare of the
lights, the heat and aridity, and
could snack and sip in a comfor
table chair.
This year in Philadelphia, the
estimated television audience will
be counted in the millions, for net
works will carry the scene to view
ers from Massachusetts to Cali
fornia. Instead of two lonely cam
eras, there will be the pooled equip
ment and programming of the va
rious nets.
But there is a greater contrast
in the Republican political situa
tion than in the delegates’ physi
cal surroundings between today
and 1940.
No one who witnessed the Willkie
stampede can forget. It was just
about as unorthodox a procedure as
history records, for the candidate
was chosen, not in the hall, nor in
a smoke-filled room either, but out
in the sticks. If this Is to be a
“wireless” convention, the 1940 af
fair was a convention “by wire.”
A group of high-pressure ama
teurs, who were no amateurs when
it came to organized action, was
putting pressure on the "big men”
in every community, and the "big
men” were getting to bosses or to
the delegates direct by telegram
and telephone. The Willkie ama
teurs “stole” the show from the pro
fessionals, and the professionals
swore it never would happen again.
It Isn’t happening this year.
Another highly interesting con
trast between conventions — this
time between 1948 and 1944—is the
hectic atmosphere of today as op
posed to the comparative calm then.
There was a “Dewey-has-it-in-the-
bag” feeling back in Chicago four
years ago which took the zip out of
the Chicago air. Also the war over
shadowed the conclave then. The
National Republican (the party
newspaper) started off its lead ar
ticle on June 26, 1944: “With the
invasion news commanding the at
tention of the entire convention . . .”
Another contrast between ’44
and ’48 is in the attitude toward
foreign policy. Then it was the
most delicate question which
faced the platform committee. To
day Senator Vandenberg has for
eign policy wrapped up in a neat
package signed with his name
and sealed with his signet ring.
That issue is no worry at aU.
DEMO SONGSTRESS...Eighteen-
year-old Phyllis Hoyland of Wash
ington, D. C., has been selected to
sing the Star Spangled Banner at
the Democratic national convention
in Philadelphia July 12. She is •
soprano.
AMBASSADOR . . . Newly appoint
ed British ambassador to the U. S.
is Sir Oliver Franks. A professor of
philosophy, the 43-year-old Briton
never has held a diplomatic post or
political office before.
NAVY NURSE . . . Ensign Yoshiko
Tanigawa, a native of BossviUe,
Calif., is the first and only nurse of
Japanese ancestry to be commis
sioned as a member of the U. S.
navy nurse corps. She’s at work in
the naval hospital at Long Beach.
DEFIANCE . . . William Z. Foster,
head of the U. S. Communist party,
told the senate judiciary committee
that the party would not obey the
Mundt-Nixon “anti-Communist” bill
if the measure becomes law. He
also testified that American Com
munists would not fight against
Russia in the event of war.
SCRIPT' WRITER ... Rene Borgia,
author of allegedly “slanderous”
scripts used on Voice of America
broadcasts, told congress that ma
terial for the disputed programs
was taken from a WPA guide book
and John Gunther’s “Inside U.S.A.”
MONKEY SHINES . . . Three pickets, emulating the three fabulous'
monkeys who "see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil,” are shown
in front of tie Republican national headquarters in Washington as they
protested against the Mundt-Nixon anti-Communist bill. Whether they
meant to apply the three monkeys symbolism to the anti-Red bill or to
their own sentiments is not clear. Also, they aren’t lined up in the
correct “see, hear, speak” order. Still, it wasn’t a bad stunt as stunts
go these days.
TO PLUMB THE UNIVERSE . . . With appropriately impressive cere
monies the world’s largest mirror telescope received its dedication in
the Palomar mountain, Calif., observatory. It was christened the Hale
telescope in honor of the late Dr. George Ellery Hale, pioneering chair
man of California Institute of Technology’s observatory council, who
first envisioned the project 20 years ago. The 200-inch mirror can be
seen at the upper right.
LOW LEVEL AIR MAIL . . . Ever since the days of the pony express
ingenious Americans have been looking for new ways to deliver mail.
Here is one way. The 155-foot blimp “Wonder Ship” set a precedent by
making a low level delivery of a mail pouch with contributions to the
Greater New York fund. The mail was delivered at the seaplane base
at 23rd street and East River in New York. The whole thing only goes
to prove what can be done when a press agent sets his mind to it.
PRISONERS OF WAR—AN OLD STORY . . . Despite talk of a truce
and abortive peace negotiations, the war in Palestine continues its
sullen course, producing deaths, destruction and prisoners as all wars do.
These two members of the Jewish Haganah were captured by the Arabs
after the battle of Kfar Etzyon, a strategic Jewish settlement outside
Jerusalem. Arab reports say these were the only two prisoners taken.
Republicans Vie for South
C APITOL HILL IS TALKING
about a move to adopt the re
bellious southern Democrats in th#
Republican party. The plan is to
offer the G. O. P. vice-presidential
nomination to a southerner, possibly
Virginia’s Sen. Harry Byrd.
The idea already has picked up
some support among southern Dem
ocrats and has been given a strong
push by western Republicans. The
Republicans are eager to carve up
the “Solid South” while the time is
ripe.
One westerner, who has been
Spurring the idea in the cloakrooms,
is Utah’s Congressman William
Dawson. He proposes a Vanden-
berg-Byrd ticket, pointing out that
the big Michigan Republican al
ready has a reputation for biparti
san cooperation while the conserva-
| tive Byrd usually votes Republican
anyhow.
This ticket has the private en
dorsement of an overwhelming
number of southern Democrats
who have asked that their names be
kept secret until the merger plan
gets off thin ice. Congressmen
!rom Florida and North Carolina
predict that Vandenberg and Byrd
together could sweep their states
three-to-one.
Biggest southern fear is that
the Republicans would shunt them
aside after elections, just as hap
pened after they helped elect Her
bert Hoover In the row over A1
Smith. The mechanics of shifting
from the Democratic to the Re
publican party also is an obstacle
in the way of southern congress
men. Dawson has suggested that
the Republican party could en
dorse certain Democratic candi
dates in the South this year; and
that a system of cross-filing, as
used in California, might be
worked out in the future.
Florida’s Congressman Dwight
Rogers, one of the most active
southerners behind the plan, ack
nowledged the difficulties, but
warned: “If we don’t get together
on our own initiative, we are going
to be pushed into ifc”
Dawson also is harping on the
theme of a southern-western alli
ance.
“The South and the West think
alike on most issues,” he told a
group of southerners. “There is no
reason why we Should be divided up
the way we are.”
• • •
Lobbyists Knife Veterans
THE POWERFUL REAL-
ESTATE LOBBY has missed no
bets in its campaign to block low-
cost, public housing for war vets
and others. However, the lobby’s
latest move, engineered by senate
allies, is the shabbiest to date—cn
effort to trade off senate approval
of a bill to aid 2,200 paralyzed vet
erans for another bill, supported by
the lobby. The latter bill would
provide lush government loan in
surance for private home builders.
The real-estate senators are not
anxious to have their operations
known, but here are the facts:
At a recent closed-door meeting
of the senate banking and currency
committee. Sen. Charles Tobey of
New Hampshire sought approval of
a section of the Taft-EUender-Wag-
ner bill providing housing aid for
paraplegic veterans. These are the
tragic cases of veterans wholly par
alyzed below the waist.
However, no sooner had the
committee voted approval than
the real - estate - lobby senators
went into action. G. O. P. Sen.
Harry Cain of Washington pro
posed that “a lot of construction
people” needed help. He also
wanted to know if the housing bill
was to be dismembered and
passed in separate sections. Dem
ocratic Sen. Willis Robertson of
Virginia kept the ball rolling.
“Now that we have agreed to the
adoption of this section for vet
erans’ aid, we ought to do the same
with Title I of the bill,” observed
Robertson. Title I is a sop to pri
vate builders to offset low-cost pub
lic housing provisions of the hous
ing bill. It authorizes government
guarantees up to 90 per cent on
bank loans to private home build
ers.
“The section we just approved
and the section you gentlemen
would like to have approved are not
on a par,” objected Tobey.
However, Robertson continued to
press for a vote, at which point
able young Sen. John Sparkman of
Alabama stepped into the fray.
“I introduced a bill for the par
aplegic vets last year and have
tried to help them in every way
possible,” declared Sparkman.
“However, I have told my veteran
constituents that I would not sup
port action on independent sections
of the T-E-W bill if it jeopardized
; approval of the entire bill, includ
ing the public housing and slum-
clearance features.
Therefore he moved that the en
tire housing bill be left Intact.
The Sparkman motion carried
by one vote, thus upsetting the
plan to use aid to crippled veto
as a bargaining point to win con
cessions for private building in
terests.
AN OPEN LETTER
Messrs. Stalin and Wallace
Gents:
The letter-and-statement-exchang-
ing season is on and everybody is
trying to get into the act.
*
Well, I have been going over once
more those statements and letters
of you two boys and I don’t know
If I ever read two statements which
could mean so much to a baffled
world if they could be taken as the
real McCoy or a reasonable facsi
mile thereof.
*
I have yet to find a fellow who
Is not for everything you both
say you stand for. Every item you
list as representing something you
favor has been favored by nine
out of 10 men ever since V-J Day.
H anybody else but you, Joe, and
you, Henry, wrote letters an
nouncing a favorable stand on
those same points they would not
get In any paper in the world on
account of they are old stuff.
*
In your letter, Henry and in your
answering statement, Joe, you both
came out for:
1. Co-operative efforts for peace.
2. Reduced armies.
3. Non-interference with the sov
ereignty of another state.
4. Swifter peace with Germany.
5. An end to obstructionist tac
tics.
6. Non-interference with the do
mestic affairs of any state.
•
Who is the fellow who has been
against these, Joe? TeU me who
has been blocking, frustrating,
sabotaging and monkey-wrench
tossing whenever a conference on
these aims opened up? Who has
been walking out on and busting
up meetings? Who was that guy
who took over Czechoslovakia?
(It didn’t look to me like Harry
Truman or Georgie Marshall.)
Who has been crashing into little
countries right and left and telling
them where they get off? (The
Messrs. Dulles, Hull, Harrlman?)
What is the name of that fellow
who has been hurling the 200-
pound veto? (It didn’t sound like
“Byrnes.”)
, *
And that “century of peace” idea,
Henry, what about that? If you
had to point out somebody who
maybe wasn’t red hot for a century
of peace would you point to Uncle
Sam? Don’t you know very well
that there isn’t an American leader
who wouldn’t settle for a half cen
tury? So how come two fellows
named Josef Stalin and Henry Wal
lace put each other out in front
as the only men warm for such a
treat benefit to the human race?
*
Joe, you say "I do not know
whether the United States govern
ment approves of Mr. Wallace’s
program as a basis for an agree
ment between the United States
and Russia.” Please, will you stop
acting. The United States gov
ernment has been approving of
the program ever since the war
ended, except for that matter of
the atom bomb, and only you two
boys see eye to eye on finagling
Uncle Sam out of that one.
*
Well, anyhow the pen is mightier
than the sword and it feels better,
too. So keep on writing, as it can’t
do much harm.
Yours hopefully,
Elmer Twitcheil.
* • *
PUBLIC ENVY NO. I
A look of triumph lights his eyes
And by his knowledge I am
floored;
For he got underneath those
sheets ...
And had a look at that new Ford!
* • *
Vanishing Americanism
“Arabs armed with scimitars.”
*
“They had a little nest egg in
the bank for emergencies.”
*
“Take all the time you need to
pay.”
*
“My time is your time.”
* • •
A gang caught cracking a safe
had gone directly to the job from
a ball game. 'They were the fellows
who had kept yelling “Steal, ya
bum, steal!”
* • *
Babe Ruth will go to Yale dur
ing commencement and present to
it the original manuscript of his
life story. This will amount to
socking one over the old Yale fence.
* • •
We liked this recent observation
by Arthur Krock: “In case of a
deadlock the convention may come
In a smoke-filled room. There is
nothing wrong about it: How, ex
cept by conference, can a decision
be reached? And it is not yet a
cardinal sin to use tobacco.”
• • •
“President Truman’s western
tour will not be political.”—News
item.
*
Wanna bet?
FIRST AID to the
AILING HOUSE
m in
by Roger C.Whitmaa
QUESTION: How can I put a
maple finish on an unpainted wood
en table?
ANSWER: First rub down the
wood with fine sandpaper and steel
wool until the surfaces are smooth
and ’‘satin”-like; then wipe off the
dust with turpentine. If you wish
to have an orange maple color, you
can get this effect by the applica
tion of two coats of pure orange
shellac. The first coat should be
thinned half-and-half with denatur
ed alcohol. For other shades, apply
an oil stain, selecting the color that
you prefer from a color-card at
your local paint store. Apply the
stain as directed on the label and
finish with two coats of quick-dry
ing varnish.
QUESTION: The mortar Is
powdering between the bricks of
our chimney. How can I repair it?
ANSWER: Clean out the old
mortar to a depth of half an inch
or so, wet the grooves with water,
then pack with a mixture of 1 part
Portland cement, 1 part hydrated
lime and 5 parts of clean, coarse
sand with Just enough water to
make a workable mixture.
GIVES
when cold
miseries strib:
FAST RELIEF
ENJOY
COOL DUNKING WATER
WHEN YOU WORK OUTDOORS
BLOOD TESTED CHICKS...
N. H. t«d« • Barred Rock* • Whit. I
Wyandotte* • Rock Rod and Rod Rock Chick*
as hatchod, your choico or a*sortod.
57.95 par 10*
(No Loghorn)
kstWsetloa Guaranteed—Chlcht Scot C.O.P.~~
MANCHESTER, N. H.
TELEPHONE S14t3
ED'S CHICKS
TO COOL
SCALDS
CHAFINQ
Quickly apply soothing and com
forting GRAY’S OINTMENT with
its wholesome antiseptics and na
ture aiding medication. Nothing els*
like it—nothing so comforting—or
pleasant for externally caused skin
troubles. 35c. Get a package today;
WHY YOU
NEED A 5%
DDT Spray
Think of if—one spray
ing lasts for weeks. No
bomb-type spray or
other sprays contain
ing less than 5% DDT
can equal this for last
ing effect. Flit Surface
Spray with 5% DDT is
so powerful a single
application kills insects
today—tomorrow—
even next month.
FLIT
SURFACE SPRAY
KILLS
mis, MOSQUITOIS, ANTS,
BIDBUGS, MOTHS, ROACHES.
BUY LOW COST FLIT TODAY!
rheumatIsm
NEURITIS-LUMBAGO
MCNEIL'S
MAGIC
REM.EDY
BRINGS BLESSED RELIEF
Lars* Bottlel2.au nMj'U*. Sma!! Uze SOcI
» MITItl: ISC IUT IS IIICtTEI « I
It 111 (ill III! SIIHS ii II Mil <> ficiql il prin I
Imica mi tt.. u«. jiciimitii «. mimi*