The sun. [volume] (Newberry, S.C.) 1937-1972, March 14, 1947, Image 5
FRIDAY, MARCH 14, 1947
THE NEWBERRY SUN
Comments On
Men and Things
BY SPECTATOR
Every man has rights; he also
has obligations. A man’s rights
and obligations develop into re
sponsibilities. Every man has
individuality; and he has digni
ty as a man. South Carolina has
always recognized the dignity
of the individual. Of course the
greatest recognition of the indi
vidual is that Jehovah treats us
as individuals. It is marvellous
to contemplate, the majesty, the
Sovereign character, of each
person. If, in ancient times, the
man seemed lost in the crowd,
the Bible tells us of great per
sons, men who stood out as indi
viduals. The Christian hope is
that the redeemed man, a man
standing alone in judgement and
in salvation.
Years ago our State refused to
pass a garishee law—that is a
law which would allow an ord
er to attach a man’s wages. Un
der the law as we have it, a
Court will not compel a man to
do a piece of work. It may be
one-sided; it is one-sided; but it
is the law, as we have it.
The Courts will compel a man
to pay money; they will compel
him to give a deed to property
—if a contract calls for the pay
ment of money or the convey
ance of land, but it will not com
pel a man to do work that he
must do with his own hands.
Nor will the court imprison the
man for failure to pay money,
if he has not the money. Why?
The individual, under the law of
South Carolina, enjoys the spe
cial regard due to the dignity of
his manhood. That is why this
State has always regarded a
man’s wages as something sacred
in law. The worker receives his
wages, and he pays his church,
his lodge, his taxes, his physi
cian—and whatever else he may
owe. The inusarnce agent, the
furniture man, the butcher and
the baker can’t send bills to the
paymaster to be taken by him
from the worker’s wages.
The South Carolina policy
against a garnishee law is exact
ly, in spirit, a conclusive reason
for outlawing the check-off in
this State.
What is the check-off? It is
the practice of deducting Union
dues from a worker’s pay enve
lope. Why do that? Does the
paymaster deduct Masonic dues,
or those of the Knights of Py
thias, or the Woodmen of the
World, or the Red Men? Does
he take out money for the
Church?
Does he take out money for
poll taxes, or the automobile lic
ense tax? No; all these receive
from the individual himself
what he obligates to pay. Why
take anything from the enve
lope?
The practice of the check-off
is a form of slavery; it is a com
pulsion, though the worker is
supposed to be a free man in a
free country. The compulsion is
there in some form, as all know
Another matter is the Closed-
Shop. One need not be opposed
to Labor in orddr to oppose that.
Let us look at the matter of La
bor: Labor, as we think of it, is
a Union, an organization of
workers. Let us consider the
Worker, as an individual. What
are his rights? He has a right
to work, when and where he
chooses. We understand, nat
urally, that his right may con
flict with rights of his employer.
We can hold that in mind. The
worker cannot be compelled to
work. His rights as an Ameri
can citizen are not rights as a
member of a Union. He is a cit
izen, and as a citizen, he is en
titled to the equal protection of
the law with all other citizens.
The law protects citizens as
citizens, not as members of the
Church, or the Masonic Order,
or the Labor Union. The law is
a sword of defense, to guaran
tee to each man his liberty. It
is perfectly clear that no citizen
should fiiyl a door clsed to him
when he asserts the right to la
bor usefully. Every man has an
obligation to work; he must sup
port himself; he must support
his family; he must support the
government which protects him
in the enjoyment of his rights
as a citizen. How, then, can any
group of men forbid another
man to work? How can any
group bar a man from earning
bread and meat for his children?
If this is a democracy, even in
the mildest degree, how can we
tolerate a ban on a man’s right
to work? Not only is the Closed
Shop un-democratic, it is sub
versive of a basic right of every
man.
Is this an argument against
the working man? No, indeed;
far from it. It is an argument
for the right of every man.
The only argument for the
Check-off and the Closed-Shop
is that those practices make it
easy to maintain Unions. But
no Union is worthy of the name
if it thrives at the expenses of a
man’s bread and meat. Even if
the Union can claim and prove
a clear majority, the minority
has rights. The minority is a
group of men with wives and
children, little boys and girls,
looking to daddy for daily bread,
for shoes and clothing. Whoever
prevents that man from working
is threatening the wife and chil
dren. Of course his rights as a
man have been violated.
We may sum it up by saying
that no man can base a right on
a hardship to another man.
Nothing that I’ve written is
against anybody; I’m arguing
for a basic right of every man.
“By the sweat of your brow
you eat bread”, said the Apostle
Paul; but he didn’t say that any
man has the right to exclude a
man from working, thereby
making an American citizen a
beggar, a pensioner or an idler.
There is something wrong,
badly wrong, with the admini
stration of our Workmen’s Com
pensation Act. Either the fault
is with the Administration, or
the Act is itself badly written.
The industries of our State are
not less safe than the industries
of Georgia and North Carolina;
nor are the workers of our State
less careful than are the work
ers of Georgia and North Caro
lina. Get to the bottom of this,
then, and where is the trouble?
Why do our workers complain
of the Industrial Commission:
why do the employers complain
of it; why do the insurance com
panies complain of it? Why?
There must be an answer. The
answer should be found at once.
I am not attacking the mem
bers of the Commission, some of
whom I know very pleasantly;
but where is the trouble?
When you find that the rates
charged our South Carolina busi
ness are from thirty nine per
cent to eighty seven per cent
above the rates charged similar
enterprises in North Carolina
and Georgia, then you know
that something is badly wrong.
We ought not to play fast and
loose with either the workers or
the employers. The worker is
entitled to prompt settlement, a
fair settlement, and all the mon
ey of the award. The employer
should be charged with only
what is necessary and fair. No
one need argue this; it is as
plain as the nose on your face.
But we South Carolinians must
stop playing small' politics and
use our brains. We have brains
in the Legisalture, and charac
ter, too; so why not clear away
the laws and practices which op
erate against us?
Because the textile industry is
our largest, I looked up the rates
KILROY
HERE
^^herever merrhprs of the apned forces
went—from Korea to Cape Horn ... to Attu
... to Berchtesgaden ... to Kunming ... to
Broadway and 42nd Street—there, too, went
Kilroy!
Who was Kilroy?
He could have been a Red Cross worker.
Because they’re everywhere ... all the time.
Giving aid is their job. No one can tell when
or where trouble will stumble into someone’s
lap... when some human will need help—and
need it badly.
A GI desperately needs transportation to
the bedside of a stricken mother. That's a
job for the Red Cross.
Disaster hits a rural area. Who will meet
food and housing needs of the sufferers?
The Red Cross.
A wind-whipped fire leaves a tenement
section gutted—63 families destitute. An
other job for the Red Cross.
Multiply those cases a thousandfold—and
you begin to get an idea of the money tha*’s
needed . . . the work that’s involved!
The work’s ours. The money’s yours. Do
your part!
GIVE -
so your
RED CROSS can carry on!
Home Furniture Co.
Davis Motor Co.
SPONSORED
Mrs. J. W. White
Wells Theater
Newberry Ins. & Realty Co.
Maxwell Bros. & Lindsay
BY:
Ritz Theater
Fennell’s Jewelry Store Reagin’s Shoe Shop
Smiths Cut-Rate Drug Co.
T. M. Rogers & Son
PATROLMAN SWILLEY
AT WHITMIRE
Patrolman H. F. Swilley, who
has been with the State Highway
department as a patrolman since
1941, with the exception of a
tour of duty in the Navy is again
back on the job with the de
partment and is now located in
Whitmire, after his recent re
lease from the service, after
serving over two years as “war
den of the brig”, in Bainbridge,
Md.
Prior to volunteering his serv
ices to the Navy on January 22,
1945, patrolman Swilley was lo
cated in Watlerboro county.
His wife and their two child
ren, Horace Thomas, eight, and
Mary Frances, who will be seven
in June, expect to move to the
county at an early date to make
their home. They are now resid
ing in Florence.
Mr. and Mrs. R. J. Nichols of
Orangeburg, spent the past
weekend in Newberry with Mr.
and Mrs. Roland Bobb at their
home on Floyd street.
and found that South Carolina
rates are thirty nine per cent
above the rates of Georgia and
North Carolina; but the grocery
business pays seventy nine per
cent more; the bottlers pay
eighty per cent more; and paint
manufacturer pays eighty seven
per cent more.
Why? ,
A Stale-Owned Warehouse And
Distribution System For Liquor?
In what may be a good bill
that is a provision. What would
be the difference between the
State Liquor Warehouse System
and the late State Dispensary of
bad odor?
While our legislators are
struggling with the liquor ques
tion—which is a baffling one—
they should not delude them
selves into believing that a
.Wholesale Warehouse System
'will promote temperance. In
saying that, the advocates are
being misled by the music of
words.
The South Carolina Dispen
sary, in its most evil-smelling
days, was not a public stench in
its retail operations, but in the
Wholesale operations. Look up
the record, gentlemen.
Young people are not impres
sed by the warnings of the older
people. It was always so. The
young man thinks the old
lows are just moss-backs,
bull frogs, sitting on logs
croaking. And yet the
croakers once were young
full of the assurance and vanity
of the young of today.
Almost no one under thirty-
five had to struggle against the
Great Depression of 1931. The
golden stream is all that they
know; and they think it will
flow on forever.
Such generation seems to have
a depression; therefore each
generation must generate the
forces which produce depres
sions. Since depressions, like
rain and cold, have come, the
wise man looks ahead; he pre
pares for the rainy day; the fool
ish man, like the Prodigal Son,
spends everything — and runs
back to dad, or imposes on his
kin, his father, brother, uncle—
or some prudent kinsman who
did not think the sun would
shine every day. Some men
spend freely, depending on in
surance to provide for the wid
ow and children. But how much
insurance? Even at four per
cent (which is doubtful) an in
surance policy of twenty five
thousand dollars yields only one
thousand dollars a year.
We need not wonder at the
ever-growing public spending,
for men in private life operate
on the same basis. Only an oc
casional calamity teaches us
anything.
Mrs. R. B. Moore has returned
to her home in Oxford, N. C.,
after spending a week here in
the home of her sister and broth
er-in-law, Mr. and Mrs. J. Dave
Caldwell at their home near the
city.
Mrs. L. W. Little has returned
to her home in the county after
spending some time in Freehold,
N. J., with her daughter, Mrs. A.
P. Ramage.
Want To Buy
A Home
Select the place you want and finance
it through the
»
Newberry County Bank
Get a mortgage at reasonable interest
rates that will fit your budget—the kind
we arrange for home planners who look
ahead. A talk with us will place you
under no obligation.
NEWBERRY
COUNTY BANK
‘The Friendly Bank In The Friendly City’
Visit the...
Carolina Remnant Store
V/A
Crinkled Crepe, Floral Stripe*
and Checks, per yard ........
Chambray, Stripes and
Solids, per yard
Curiam Scrim,
Per Yard
Here you will find many hard-to-get items
59c
69c
39c " d 49c
89c
98c
42c
49c
89c
39c
Spun Rayon in Assorted
Patterns, per yard
Silk Poplin—Blue, rose
And Gold, per yard . . .
Gingham in All Colors
Per yard
Striped Print For Men’s Pajamas
Per yard
Cretonnes in Floral Patterns
Per Yard
All Chenille Bed Spreads Reduced.
Good Prints
Per Yard
Carolina Remnant Store
Caldwell Street