The sun. [volume] (Newberry, S.C.) 1937-1972, August 23, 1946, Image 2
I
/
THE NEWBERRY SUN. NEWBERRY. S. C.
irs SAME CROWD AGAIN
PARIS. — It’s hot in the galleries,
of the palace of Lti'iembourg. In the
top gallery sit hundreds of news
men — Chinese, Siamese, Greek, In
dian, New Zealanders, watching a
man speak far below. Newsmen
from all over the world watching
the peace. It’s their peace. What’s
done here will affect their countries
from Baluchistan to Iceland, from
Saskatchewan to Samoa, and they
are watching.
Far below, under the klieg lights,
sits Jimmy Byrnes — patient, polite
Jimmy Byrnes — never leaving his
seat, never failing to listen. ... A
man speaks into the microphone.
He’s interpreting Molotov ... in
French. Another man speaks. He’s
interpreting Molotov in English. . . .
It takes hours. When, you wonder,
will diplomacy ever become mod
ernized? Diplomacy hasn’t been
changed since 1815. . . . The Vienna
conference when the great powers
divided up Europe and brought on
more wars.
Paris today is depressingly
the same. We invent modern
methods of warfare. . . . Rock
ets that may reach the moon,
atomic bombs that sink na
vies, germs that can destroy
civilizations. . . . But the weap
ons of peace never keep pace
with the weapons of war . . .
nor do the diplomats who wield
the weapons of peace.
The same crowd which failed to
head off the last war is here again
—even some of the same crowd
which sat in at the last Paris peace
conference. . . . Look at their faces.
Poker faces. No life, no lift, no pas
sion for the peace they are negoti
ating, bored faces, preoccupied
faces, bored with the endless trans
lations. Bored with the whole bore
dom of diplomacy. Not a man
among them who lost an arm or a
leg, who knows what it is to suf
fer on the battlefield. These are the
men who are writing the peace.
Jimmy Byrnes is not bored. Po
lite, patient, precise Jimmy Byrnes
sits on the front row — perhaps he
is too polite, too patient. . . . You
feel like shouting down at Jimmy.
You wish you had a telephone to
reach him there, way down below.
You wish you could tell him:
“That was a great speech you
made the other day, Jimmy, but
finish it! Tell them the rest of the
story. Tell them not only that the
United States isn’t going to remain
isolated but also that we’re going
to raise hell with anyone who
blocks our path to peace. Tell them
that millions of Americans are fed
up with all this frittering; that mil
lions of Americans mean business
and will back you up in anything
you do.”
Around the senate chamber of the
palace of Luxembourg are great,
gold ornaments. Woodwork carved
in ornate shapes, heavily encrust
ed v .n gold—remnants of the lush
days of the de Medicis. ... If the
French had only been smart. If they
had only painted out the gold and
substituted white crosses! Then
perhaps the bored diplomats sitting
below would remember. . . . white
crosses . . . from Guadalcanal and
Stalingrad, from Salerno and New
Guinea, from Tobruk and the Rap-
ido, from Normandy and Aachen
. . . Close your eyes and you can
see them. . . . Thousands of white
crosses. . . . The dead speak:
“We who lie here have noth
ing left to give.
“To all your praises we are
deaf and blind.
“We may not even know if
you betray
“The hopes we cherished for
mankind.”
But the diplomats below don't
seem to hear. . . . Men in red
plush seats, fastidious men in red
plush seats, their nails polished,
their cravats carefully tied. They
don’t seem to hear. They are think
ing about procedure and majority
votes, vetoes and prestige and
whether they will get out in time
to take tea with Mrs. Ogden Mills.
One man does hear. He sits op
posite Jin mie Byrnes. ... A big,
uncouth man, his hair not even
parted. . . . Evatt of Australia. His
cockney accent is uncultured but he
dares to speak. He is the only man
who comes anywhere near preach
ing the Sermon on the Mount, who
tells the bored men in the red plush
seats that they must love their
neighbors as themselves. . . . Un
pleasantly Evatt steps on the toes
of the big nations — tells them they
have no business sabotaging the
peaceful goal of others. . . . They
don’t like Evatt, but they listen.
Even patient, polite Jimmie Byrnes
doesn’t like Evatt. But he listens.
. . . Thousands of men under white
crosses listen, too.
* • •
BARTERING OVER PEACE
Clement Attlee, prime minister of
Britain, speaks — the man who per
formed the miracle of defeating
War Leader Winston Churchill—a
modest man, a sincere, earnest
man. His bald head shines under
the klieg lights. But it is no halo.
. . . Some hours before Attlee was
haggling with Byrnes over the fu
ture of Germany—bartering over
the peace of the world; wanting to
trade off a British policy in
Palestine for an American policy
in Germany.
IktcMome
*1044*1
in WASHINGTON
By Walter Shead
WNU Corrnpondtnl
WNU Washington Bureau,
1616 Eye St., N. W,
Weak New OPA Bill Controls
By ‘Psychological’ Means
ENACTMENT of the new OPA
^ bill, weak as it is, may have a
psychological if not an actual hand
in controlling prices, this report
er believes. Although it is a hodge
podge of conflicting ideas, it is def
initely better than nothing.
As the result of this bill, for all
practical purposes, Agricultural
Sec. Clinton P. Anderson becomes
the new boss of the food price con
trol. Although the law places final
authority in the three-man decon
trol board, the cumbersome admin
istrative process gives the secre
tary exclusive authority to recom
mend to the board. In all likelihood
the policy of the board will be set
in accordance with the pokey of Mr.
Anderson.
One of the secretary’s well known
views is the elimination of food sub
sidies. As a matter of fact, pres
ent prices on foods, except some
which have soared beyond all reas
on and which are in short supply,
are believed by the agricultural
boss to reflect the ceiling prices of
June 30, when OPA control went
off, plus subsidy costs. Elimination
of government subsidies are be
lieved to account for an approxi
mate 10 per cent increase on foods
formerly subsidized, and, with an
other 5 per cent added on, the pre
diction is that most foods will level
off at about a 15 per cent increase.
Benefit to ‘Little Man*
This brings into focus again the
endless argument, is it cheaper for
the general public to pay govern
ment subsidies than to pay for a
10 per cent increase in food prices
at the retail level? And the an
swer is, it is cheaper, for the little
fellow, those millions whose in
come is $3,000 a year and under, be
cause he doesn’t pay the subsidy in
federal taxes.
At any rate, the government at
this writing is not paying out a dime
for food subsidies on meat or dairy
products. Subsidies went out with
the old OPA in June. If, however,
meat,and other products go back
under price control, it will be a
question for the agriculture boss
and the decontrol board to decide
whether or not to reinstitute sub
sidy payments as a policy or to do
something else about control. The
new law ends all subsidies by April
1, 1947.
The mere fact, however, that the
decontrol board has the authority
under the new law to reinstate price
ceilings without consulting industry
or without giving advance notice,
we believe will act as a psychologi
cal threat v. hich at least will make
industry and producers a little cau
tious about • boosting prices beyond
reason. i
Opposed to Subsidies
Farm organizations and the dairy
industry have been fighting for
elimination of food subsidies for
years, declaring that the treasury
should not pay the public’s grocery
bill and that farm produce should
go to market and be sold at a fair
price fixed by supply and demand.
They now have won that fight, at
least temporarily. Subsidies are off.
These subsidies in two categories
nave amounted to a little over
three billion dollars annually. In
theory farmers are supposed to
make up for loss of this three billion
in increased prices. But will this be
true?
There is every reason to believe
that the cost of everything the farm
er buys will rise considerably.
With the old OPA gone, cost ab
sorption by industry is also out and
this means quick price gains for
many goods to as high as 9 per cent.
The farmer gained only 10 per oent
by elimination of subsidies. And in
addition there will be many in
creases in manufacturing costs
which later will be “seen in the re
tail selling price . . . fencing, build
ing materials, all kinds of farm ma
chinery, commodities of every de
scription . . . and there are many
experts here who predict at least
a 15 per cent rise in these things
the farmer buys to equal the 15 per
cent increase in food costs.
Farmer May Feel Better
So the question of whether the
farmer is better off with or with
out subsidies is still a moot ques
tion and likely will be. One thing,
however, the average farmer, in
dependent as he is, may feel bet
ter in knowing that the price he re
ceives from his products, whether
they are high or low prices, is not
in part a government hand-out.
Meanwhile, farm leaders here are
getting set through these next few
months for the new 80th congress,
which convenes January 3. They
have important measures, passed
over by the old congress, which they
will reintroduce for action ... a
new parity definition, which is the
legal basis for price support.
A long range program, meas
ured in the light of war experience
and in the new concept of the world
picture for agriculture is likely to
develop. The fight to create a single
farm credit agency, lost in this
congress, again will be sought.
PAPER, NOT RICE . . . Hearing that an estimated 1,557,000 pounds of rice are wasted annually by well-
wishers at American weddings, Fred Boggio and his pretty bride, the former Bridget Maraud, requested
that none of the precious grain be thrown at their ceremony. The couple is being showered with confetti as
they emerge from Our Lady of Mount Carmel church in New York City,
ONE-ARMED BANDITS ... and ail sorts of other gambling, including roulette, dice, cards and an up-to-the-
minute race results board will flourish on the floating casino, “Lux,” a ship which will be anchored six miles
off shore at Long Beach, Calif. The idea of staying out in the ocean is to evade federal and state laws prohibit
ing gambling. Attorneys for Tony Cornero, owner and operator of the Lux, believe that he will be untouchable
out in the deep. Speedboats will taxi patrons back and forth every five minutes.
BONUS FOR BABIES ... In an effort to encourage parenthood, the
British government now is paying mothers five shillings (about a dol
lar in American money) per week living allowance for every baby
after the first. Payment is authorized by family allowance act of
May, 1945. System went into effect Aug. 6, 1946.
WE WANT OUR BALL . . . Neighborhood boys picket the home of
resident of Glendale, Calif., claiming that he refuses to return a base-
bail they knocked into his yard. The property owner says he kept the
hall after a stem of a flower was broken in his yard. Two police of
ficers were on hand, trying desperately to look grim and to insure
that picketing was “peaceful.” No outbreak of violence had been re-
I orted when darkness caused retreat
VEST-POCKET HERCULES . . .
Anthony Muir, 3, son of a former
Melbourne, Australia, wrestling
champion, weighs in at 49 pounds
in his training program for the
1960 heavyweight title. No sweets
are permitted in his program of
training. Anthony is given a daily
training schedule with muscle
building equipment designed for
him.
WOUNDED VETS FISH . . . With
officers acting as bait boys,
wounded veterans, all wheelchair
patients, enjoyed fishing at Redon
do Beach, Calif. Paraplegic vet,
Harry Rotunni, is shown being
lowered in a special hoist.
U.PhiUipr
RADIO CASE 180,760,492
Editor’s Note: While WlncheU
(Reversing the situation, a Sunday night
radio listener has John J. Anthony, the
“What’s Your Problem Man,” on the
stand).
Q. Now, Mr. Anthony, what’s your
complaint?
A. I have no complaint. You’re
mixed up.
Q. Come, come, Mr, Anthony,
there must be times when organ
music and poetry let you down a
bit.
A. Never. Give me a poem, an
organ and other people’s troubles
and Tm as happy as a lark.
Q. Mr. Anthony, there MUST be
something bothering you like every
body else. Are you happy at home?
A. Certainly.
Q. Well, go on in your own way
and tell the radio audience why.
A. On my program we only tell
why people are NOT happy at
home.
Q. Why stay in a rut? Out with
it, when did your happiness begin?
In what quarrel did you first notice
it?
A. I tell you, there was no quar
rel.
Q. No fights, no quarrels, no dis.
sentions?
A. None.
Q. You mean to tell the judges
who have kindly come here tonight
to get a little free publicity that noth
ing has ever happened in your home
that the radio audience should know
abou + ?
A. I do.
A Judge: That’s the old familiar
pattern by which so many mar
riages go on the rocks, my boy.
What you need is a good family
quarrel. My advice to you is that
you go home and try being very un
happy for a change. It may make
a new man of you.
Q. Let’s make out you are an
other case, Mr. Anthony. Say, Case
3457289. That’s the case that won’t
go out and get a job and help keep
the home. Now, why don’t you go
to work instead of sitting around
all week waiting for Sunday night
to come?
A. I don’t sit around all week.
Q. And, furthermore, when did
this woman desert you?
A. What woman?
Q. Please go on and tell us all
about it in your own way from that
point.
A. What point?
Q. The point where you told your
father you wanted to play the ba
zooka like other kids and he ordered
you out of the house with the baby.
A. You’re all mixed up.
Q. Now, Mr. Anthony, remember
what you said at my office. You
said you were willing to take the
four cross-eyed sisters in to live
with you if the soldier would give
them a name and wear shoes at
the dinner table. Pull yourself to
gether and speak distinctly into the
mike.
A. Could I read a poem to touch
the heart now?
Q. All the hearts in tonight’s au
dience have been already touched.
Dr. Spotlight, what do you think of
this case?
Judge Spotlight (coming out of a
trance): I see no problem here at
all. This man should live with the
three deaf aunts until their grand
father finishes his college course. It
will be time enough after that to
see about formal adoption. Further
more, I think the boy who wants
to come home from the penitentiary
and beat his mother is wrong.
There is something to be said for the
mother’s stand that she wants no
part in the beating unless assured
the fight is broadcast.
* • •
Just Casting About
Fred MacMurray has been
chosen to play the male lead in
“The Egg and I.” We rather looked
for the part to go to “Hennery”
Fonda or Walter Pidgen.
»
Tom Drake and Donald Duck
would have sounded okay in the egg
play, too.
*
And for the right touch, what
screen actress would fit better in
the female lead than Evelyn Laye.
*
Cary Grant plays Cole Porter in
“Night and Day” and if he looks
or acts like Porter then Monty Wool-
ley is the image of Tad Jones and
the ideal man to play the late
Arthur T. Hadley would be Jimmy
Durante.
* • •
Elmer Twitchell has one of those new
house-to-auto telephones. Absentmindedly
he took it in the other day for a greasr
job.
• • •
E-valuating ‘Morale’:
We have been looking into army
and navy “E” awards. . . . Even
if all the thousands of them were
meritorious — which is an absurd -
hypothesis—this system adds up to
a $100,000,000 scandal. Based on a
theory that such hooey boosted the
workers’ morale, it cost probably
50,000,000 man hours in war-plants,
25,000 lost days for officers, diver
sion of transportation facilities and
waste of gas, plus some of the high
est-powered hangovers ever experi
enced by men in uniform.
Army-navy urged these plants to
throw celebrations. Some turned
into week-long drunks, with whiskey
and champagne suppers, imported
entertainers and party girls, arrive
ing in private cars and chartered
planes. All this was legally deducti
ble for income tax purposes,
chargeable against production costs
and valid accounting in contract
renegotiation.
Officers were assigned, often
traveling hundreds and thousands of
miles, taking several weeks" on a
job, all on government pay and
travel and subsistence expenses.
One public relations officer was al
ways sent on ahead, to whip up the
show. Higher ones came on later,
to make stuffy speeches, ride in
parades and souse up With the hap
py executives and their ladies.
There was usually a shutdown.
All hands were guests at shows and
blowouts, in hotels, country clubs,
local theatres taken over. Besides,
there were more exclusive to-dos
for officers and corporation officials,
“guardian angels” and other politi
cians, with costly souvenirs handed
out — everything charged as legiti
mate expense.
PROs were briefed by higher of
ficers to encourage as much hoopla
as the plants could swing. Some
of them did practically no other
work. The signal corps, wjth only
about a half-dozen HQ posts in the
country, traveled its advance
agents countless miles. Often the
plants paid these men’s expenses
and those of higher officers, al
though the army did, too, doubling
the cost to the taxpayer.
It was one of the sweetest rack
ets of the conflict to exterminate
the enemy by good old Yankee
horse-sense and can-do. A triumph
of E-bombs!
The Hollywood gin rummy
swindle was turned up by a cub
reporter (Los Angles Examiner)
on his first assignment. The pa
per had a tip that Michael Mac-
Dougall, the sleuth who special
izes in such things, was in '
town. . . . Baker Conrad was
sent on this thin tip. ... He ran
into some members of a club
he thought might be involved.
They were talking out loud-
spilling names and dll—on the
story the youngster wasn’t
even sure was cooking. . . . He
got an earful and ran to a phone.
. . . The first newsbreak said
only that three sharpers had
taken Hollywood big boys — no
names mentioned. . . . An hour
after the edition hit the street,
three heavy winners had en
gaged a high-priced lawyer to
“protect their interests.”
The prisoner in the dark Gestapo
dungeon in Berlin was tall, gaunt
Rudolf Diels, founder of the Gestapo
in the first turbulent days of the
Nazi regime. had said "no”
to Adolf when the fuehrer ordered
him to liquidate an old pal who had
outlived his usefulness to the swas
tika-gang. Now, Rudolf sat in his
cell, awaiting the hangman—by or
der of Hitler, who did not like peo
ple who dared to say “no.”
Standing before Diels was med
al-dripping Hermann Goering. “I
order you to divorce my sister,”
growled Goering. “Get out of her
life. We cannot have a man in our
family hung!”
Diels, a cool character, shrugged
his shoulders, told Goering where
to go.
Circumstances — too long and in
volved to relate here—saved Diels
from the hangman. Today, sitting
in a villa in Nuernberg, he sup
plies the prosecution with valuable
information against the major war
criminals. Among his frequent vis
itors was Capt. Harry N. Sperber,
chief German interpreter at the
trials.
“Strange,” mused Diels to Harry,
a sardonic smile on his sallow,
sabre-slashed face. “It looks as if
—after all—dear Hermann will have
a man in the family hung! . . . Him
self!”
THE INCREDIBLE
Count that day lost
Beyond your wails
That sees no headline
“Russia Assails.”
* * • i
Twenty-six ball players have
just met with big league club own
ers on a new deal including better
wages, pensions, etc.
♦
There was pride in Casey’s manner
As he came up to the plate—
There was firmness in his bearing
As he asked a higher rate.
“Dark of the Moon” has gone
home, to the Smoky mountains,
where it was written, about its own
people, by Howard Richardson and
William Barney. ... It was staged
at the Community theatre, in
Asheville, N. C. . . , That is 15
miles from where the authors found
the ballad of Barbara Allen, theme
of their play. . . . Viscount Las-
celles, nephew of King George VI
of England, has a play he wrote
making the Broadway cfific*
rounds.