McCormick messenger. (McCormick, S.C.) 1902-current, September 29, 1938, Image 7
McCORMICK MESSENGER, McCORMICK, S. C.. THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 1938
. OUR COMIC SECTION
m
i
P
o
p
•y
J. Millar Waft
ewNU
THAT'S HORACE./
PHOEBE DIDN'T ENCOURAGE
GOT RED HAIR.'
THAT'S RUPERT !
PHOEBE DIDN'T BOTHER
ABOUT HIM--HE >*/AS
ALWAYS SHOWING
OFF !
THAT'S DICK! PHOEBE LIKED
HIM BUT HE WAS TOO
SLOUCHY —
THAT'S BILL?
HE WAS TOO HARD^
vorkingl
50 SHE ISN'T NO !
MARRYING NONEOF'EM
ANY OF HAS ASKED #
'EM /T^HER /
Bell SywHcaU.—WNU Service. J
■>
PICKED WRONG GIRL
“Say, how’d yer sheik git de black
eye?”
“Fell down on his promise t’ take
me out—-an* got hurtr*
Plenty Tbankfnl
Jennie didn’t like spinach, but she
' ate it anyhow. Then when she asked
to leave the table, mother told her
she’d have to say her grace first.
“Got nothin’ to be thankful for,”
grumbled Jennie.
“Then stay where you are until
you have!”
Silence. Then a small voice—
“Thank the Lord I wasn’t sick from
that spinach. Now kin I leave?”—
Washington Post.
DOWN ON THE FARM
Farmer Bug—My, what a large
bulb. I wouldn’t like to dig a hole
to plant that in.
Bruchart'a Washington MHqest
Three Times in Row President’s
‘Purge’ Attempts Prove Futile
Roosevelt Unable to Transmit Personal Popularity to His
Followers; Political Prestige Suffers Irreparable Dam
age; Forced Realignment Seen Complete Flop.
By WILLIAM BRUCKART
WNU Service, National Press Bldg., Washington, D. C.
WASHINGTON.—There was quite
a sermon, for me, in the telegram
of congratulations that Virginia’s
great leader, Sen. Carter Glass, sent
to Senator George upon the occa
sion of Senator George’s victory in
the attempted New Deal “purge”
in Georgia. I don’t know why that
telegram was not more widely print
ed, but it was typically like Carter
Glass, so cryptic, so full of mean
ing, that I am going to reprint it
here:
“Senator Walter F. George, At
lanta, Ga.
“God bless you, Walter. Like
wise, the sovereign State of Geor
gia.
“Signed. Carter Glass.”
To get its true meaning, one
has to recall that Senator George
was the third Democratic sena
tor, in a row, who was openly
opposed by President Roosevelt;
the third marked to be “purged”
from the Democratic party and
the third in a row to be victorious
over the President’s ill-advised
attempt to dominate voters of a
state, and, in due course, the con
gress of the United States, by
personally picking the Democratic
party nominees.
Next, Mr. George had been sub
jected to perhaps the strongest New
Deal slap by the President, of any
of the nine senators whom the Pres
ident originally described as men
behind the times. It will be re
called how Mr. Roosevelt, with Sen
ator George on the platform, spoke
his blessing of United States Attor
ney Camp at Barnesville, Ga., and
announced his conclusion that Mr.
George represented the past, not the
future. It was on that occasion, too',
that Mr. Roosevelt uttered the now
famous: “God bless you, Walter; I
hope we will always be friends.”
The third feature to be remem
bered is that Mr. George won, that
former Governor Talmadge was
second and that the New Deal can
didate was third in the race, and
that Mr. George’s victory was so
overwhelming that there was no
need for a run-off primary—the
method in the solid Democratic
states of choosing between the two
highest candidates from the prima
ry vote. This means that a ma
jority of the voters—more than 50
per cent—voted for Mr. George.
President 9 * Prestige Has
Suffered Heavy Damage
Couple these facts with Senator
Tydings’ victory over Rep. David J.
Lewis for the Democratic senatorial
nomination in Maryland, and Sen.
“Cotton ’Ed” Smith’s substantial
margin over Governor Johnston in
South Carolina, and it appears to me
that several conclusions are proper
and justifiable. Mr. Roosevelt went
into South Carolina in behalf of Gov
ernor Johnston and he went into
Maryland to promise construction of
several huge Chesapeake bay
bridges and to point to the good
qualities of Representative Lewis.
Yet, the President’s wishes were
well ignored.
The conclusions I have reached—
and I believe they will stand the
most critical test—are:
1. Mr. Roosevelt is unable to
transmit to his followers the same
personal popularity that he has en- i
joyed since entering the White
House.
2. His prestige as a political lead
er, which undoubtedly was slipping
to some extent before, has now suf
fered irreparable damage.
3. The congress that will be elect
ed in November will be the most
independent, indeed, probably the
most obstreperous, that the Presi
dent has faced, and that spells trou
ble in a big way.
4. There can be no discounting the
influence that victories for the con
servatives, like those won by Tyd
ings, Smith and George, will have
on the rest of the country in the
November elections. It is dn hon
est statement, I believe, that there
are numerous voters who have been
wavering between the New Deal and
the conservative school of thought,
and a large percentage of them will
turn to conservative candidate when
they have a chance. They will be
influenced strongly, and that fact
worries the New Deal thinkers at
the moment.
‘Purge 9 but Step In Plan
Of Political Realignment
But there is yet another thought
in this connection. I refer to the
President’s program for a realign
ment Of political groups in this coun
try. He has called for it; of that
there is no obvious doubt. The
“purge” of the senators marked for
political destruction was one of the
early steps. So, it is significant that
Mr. Roosevelt’s early maneuver in
the direction of a forced realign
ment has succeeded to the extent of
a complete flop. The thing that
started out to be a beautiful swan
like dive became a belly-buster,
much to the chagrin of the great
thinkers who surround the Presi
dent and give him such poor politi
cal advice.
There will be a condition in the
next congress that will be worthy of
watching. Surely, no one will ex
pect Tydings and Smith and George
and Clark of Missouri and six or
eight other senators to go out of
their way to support a Roosevelt
program in which they may not
believe. There is the nucleus. There
were already 20 or more senators of
that mind. With those re-elected
after overcoming the “purge,” it
seems reasonable to suppose that as
little political credit as possible will
be given to the President.
House members nearly always
keep in close touch with the sena
tors of their respective states, par
ticularly if they are of the same po
litical faith. They will take encour
agement from the forthrightness of
their seniors and, quite naturally,
will be bolder and more outspoken.
It will be much more difficult for
Democratic Leader Rayburn to hold
his majority together in the house
of representatives because of this
new-found courage and, in some
cases, resentment.
All of which leads into a third
phase. Few Presidents have been
able to withstand bushwhacking
from Capitol Hill. It confronts Mr.
Roosevelt to an unparalleled degree
because of the “purge.” Thus, a fur
ther analysis seems to offer evi
dence, at least a hint, that Mr.
Roosevelt’s control of the Demo
cratic party may be broken. If it
is not now an accomplished fact, I
see no reason to expect that the
President can control the Democrat
ic national convention of 1940. That,
after all, is one of the things at
stake in the President’s ill-starred
‘.‘purge” attempts.
Some Heads May Fall;
New Spokesmen Appear
In consequence of these things, I
have an idea that there will be
many, many moves made during
the next session and in the session
just before the 1940 convention de
signed to take the Democratic party
out of the hands of the Roosevelt
advisers. I think you will see dele
gates being groomed here and
there, 18 months before they are to
be formally chosen. I believe also
that state political bosses will be
come quite active next summer as
they watch which way the wind
blows. Some will guess wrong, some
right. Some political heads will fall
and new spokesmen will appear on
the scene;
All of these things, I predict, will
happen, barring one thing. That
one thing is war. If there is a gen
eral European war on the horizon,
then we may expect a different
course of political events in the
United States.
What I am about to say, now, is
not said in discredit of the Presi
dent. It is merely voicing a fact in
politics. If there be a general war
abroad, and, more particularly, if
American relations become involved
in it, then Mr. Roosevelt unquestion
ably will appeal for solidarity of
public opinion, for unanimous sup
port for the government of the na
tion. His spokesmen and henchmen
will be busy as bees showing him
to be the only man for the job, the
only man capable of saving the na
tion. That happened in Woodrow
Wilson’s time and it has happened
in every other war, and it will hap
pen again.
Political Destruction
Of Roosevelt Threatened
I know that Mr. Roosevelt is no
more anxious to have the United
States become involved in war than
you or I. He realizes its cost in
blood, as well as the disarrange
ment of world economics that fol
lows. And if war comes, he natural
ly will want a united nation back
of him. But, coldly and abstractly,
I repeat that war conditions are the
only set of circumstances that I see
now which may prevent a thorough
going movement on Capitol Hill for
the political destruction of Mr.
Roosevelt. When I say, political de
struction, I do not mean to imply,
or to hint that opponents of the Pres
ident within his own party want to
send him to oblivion. They will
seek—they are seeking, now—to de
throne him in every way except as
titular head of the party. They
want the guidance to come from old
Democratic leaders and they want
adherence to old Democratic princi
ples. That is to say, the long-time
oracles of the Democratic party
have witnessed stupidity, sheer
dumbness, on the part of the young
squirts who have crowded close to
the President, and they want to
send those quacks back to the oblivi
on from which they came. Further,
the old line Democrats want to avoid
a wide-open split in their party. Un
less that can be done in 1940, there
will be a Republican victory fol
lowed by exactly the same condi
tions that wrecked the Republicans
after the “purge” that the voters
gave the G. O. P. in 1932 and 1936.
£> Western Newspaper Union.
Jlsk Me ^Another
0 A General Quiz
1. What congress was oncfe held
in a Baltimore tavern?
2. Is there a town that has no
chimneys?
3. From where do we get th«
word “money”?
4. What city in Colorado owns a
glacier?
5. Why is the card game called
fargo?
6. What is the weight of the
bronze entrance doors of the Su
preme Court building in Washing
ton, D. C.?
7. Who invented the ice cream
freezer?
8. Which English queen had 17
children?
9. Is Radio City a single build
ing or a group of buildings?
10. Why is a section of the Ten
nessee river called Musclo
Shoals?
The Answers
1. The Continental congress of
1776-77.
2. Mason City, Wash., with a
population of 3,000, is heated with
electricity and has no chimneys.
3. From the Latin “moneta,”
me of the surnames of Juno. The
first mint was attached to her
temple.
4. Boulder, Colo.,. owns Arapa
hoe glacier, which is the source of
the city’s water supply.
5. It is from Pharaoh, a picture
Df the Egyptian king originally
appearing on a card of the old
French pack.
6. The doors weigh 3,000 pounds
each and are rolled out of sight
when the building is open.
7. It was invented by George
Washington.
8. Queen Anne, who reigned
jver England from 1702 to 1714.
9. Radio City is the name given
to the four buildings on the Sixth
avenue side of Rockefeller Center.
These are the 70-story RCA build
ing, the RKO office building, the
Music hall and the RKO theater.
10. The muscular demands on
the Indians and early settlers in
zanoes bound upstream is sup
posed to have suggested the name.
Malaria Can KILL
Don’t get the idea that Malaria
is not important. In 1936, for in
stance, 3,700 people died from
Malaria in our 12 Southern states
alone!
Wintersmith’s is a doctor’s com
pound for Malaria. It contains
world-famous medicines for treat
ing the disease—known by every
doctor, and prescribed in millions
of cases every year!
Your druggist has Wintersmith’s
—or he will gladly get it for you.
See him TODAY, and ask for
Wintersmith’s—the Tonic that your
parents and your grandparents
took to relieve Malaria—the Tome
PROVEN by 70 years’ nse.
Worthy Spark
Our humanity were a poor thing
were it not for the divinity which
stirs within us.—Bacon.
How Women
in Their 40’s
Can Attract Men
[ere’s good advice for^a woman durin^her
iange (usually from 38 to 62), who —_—
le’U lose her appeal to men, who warriea
bout hot flashes, loss of pep, dizzy spells,
pset nerves and moody spells.
Get more fresh air, 8 hr*.
uet more iresn a»r, o azu. sleep and if you
ed a good general system tonic take Lydia
Pinkham’s Vegetable Compound, made
teeiallv for women. It helps Nature build
i physical resistance, thus helps give more
vacity to enjoy life and. assist canning
terv nerves and disturbing symptoms that
Unattained
Success is counted sweetest by
those who ne’er succeed.—Emil
Dickinson.
GS
BUCK LEAF 40"
Keeps Dogs Away from
Evergreens, Shrubs etc.
^ 1936 Use 1 Vi Teaspoonful
par Gallon of Spray.
And All Is Well
today is the tomorrow you wor-
d about yesterday.
i
WNU—7
39—38
ruined eyes
by neglect; they get red and
sore and you let them go. Don’t
do it. Leonardi’s Golden Eye
Lotion cures soreness without
pain in one day. Cools, heals
and strengthens. 7
LEONARDI’S
GOLDEN EYE LOTION
MAKES WEAK EYES STRONG
3So •* M druggist*
New Large Site with Dropper—SO cent*
t. B. Leonard! It Co M New Rochelle, N. T.