The Newberry herald and news. (Newberry, S.C.) 1884-1903, March 09, 1892, Image 1

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

ESSIIE865. NEWBERRY, S.C., WDNESDA, MAR CII9: 82 RC 15 AIT1UAL REPORT -OF COUNTY TREASURER -OF NEWBERRY COUNTY For the Fiscal Year Com mencing November 1st, 1890, and Ending October 31st, 1891. Ordinar y County Fund, 1888-89. No. 43 J. A. Kinard, $2 10 146 R. C. Carlisle, 5 00 186 A.'H. Wheeler, 1 60 Ordinary County Fund, 1889-90. No. 558 T. J. Maffett,. $190 394 C. F. Boyd, witness ticket, 4 00 273 " " - 1 25 253 G. B. Caldwell, 9 25 187 A. H. Wheeler,witness ticket, 16 90 152 C. J. Purcell, 1 50 247 J. L. Aull, 1 50 145 W. W. Hodges, 12 50 37 W. A. Hill, 1400 136 C. & G. S. Mower, 50 00 92 D. H. Wheeler, 7 70 96 S. J. Cromer, 1 00 112 C. Mower, 2 25 113 C. & G. S. Mower, 50 00 122 Luther & Hawkins, 21 45 123 J. W. White, 4 60 124 Leavell & Speers, 1 50 127 W. F. Brown, 5 80 129 Wheeler & Moseley, 8 35 Ordinary County Fund, 1890-91. No. 575 N. B. Mazyck, Agt., $ 40 00 584 Geo. B. Cromer, 28 60 588 S. P. Boozer, so560 590 A. H. Wheeler, jury tickets, 268 10 592 G. G. Sale, 85 1 H. C. Koon, 1 05 4 Jno. R. Leavell, 15 00 5 J. N. Martin, 15 00 11 C. B. Buist, 10 50 13 J. 0. Wells, 50 00 16 Wallace & Kinard, 5 75 26 W. T. Tarrant, Agt., 45 00 28 W. W. Riser, 68 30 29 ". " 55 50 30 " 8275 32 J. G. Senn, 4 00 33 J. O. Wells, 85 00 34 Shockly Bros., 5 00 35 Berry Neeley, 2 00 36 W. C. Cromer, 5 35 38 Minter & Jamieson, 6 10 39 Summer Bros., 37 05 44 Minter & Jamieson, 10 80 45 W. G. Houseal. 12 90 47 S. N. Henderson, 30 80 55 J. M. Kibler, 49 70 56 C. B. Bniat, 42 10 47'no. M. Kinard, 6 00 61 " 41 10 63 J. O. Wells, 3 50 64 " - 165 00 65 Geo. B. Cromer, 30 90 66 G. M. Girardeau, 18 65 67 Phillip Spotts, 12 00 68 Aull & Houseal, 6 25 69 0. Wells. 35 00 70 Wallace & Kinard, 5 00 71 W. P. Sheeley, 6 35 72 W. W. Riser, 80 70 73 I - 22 28 74 " "4 00 75 C. Mower, 5 90 77 " 13 95 80 " 9 00 82 C. & G. S. Mower, 95 30 84 E. A.Scott, 63 00 85 Borton & Wilson. 25 00 91 S. S. Cunningham, 3 10 93 W. C. Brown, 5 00 95 J. M. Ki bler, 10 00 97 Geo. B. Cromer, 1 80 100 J. H. Smith. 12 00 101 A. H. Wheeler. 7 00 103 " - witness tickets, 11 80 104 " " expense act., 9 75 105 W. C. C. Cromer, 14 00 106 Geo. B. Cromer, 19 95 110 W. W. Hodges, 12 00 115 J. B. Fellers, 6 00 118 0. Wells. 5 85 119 W. W. Riser, 46 70 89 C. 0. Bozhardt, 6 65 94 J. N. Martin, 4 70 98 Peoples & Johnson, 3 65 107 C. & G. S. Mower, 128 24 108 Summer Bros., 32 70 109 Wallace & Kinard, 7 00 111 Jos. Wood, 26 00 114 C. & G. S. Mower, 40 30 116 C. B. Buist, 10 75 117 WV. G. Houseal, .10 75 120 Boozer & Goggans, 14 25 121 F. V. Capers, 3 13 125 WV. W. Hodges, 3 50 126 J. N. Feagle, 16 60 128 W. F. Brow!I, 2 25 130 5. N. Hendeson, 12 00 131 L. F. Longshore, 2 00 132 P. E. Wise, 2 00 133 B. B. H air, 19 15 134 J. H. Smnit b, 3 00 135 C. & G. S. Mower, 10 40 137 Geo. B. Cromer, 16 65 138 C. F. Boyd, keeping ferry, 18 75 139 WV. W. Riser, 47 :30 140 J. W. D. Johnson, 9 70 141 J. N. Feagle, 9 75 142 WV. T. Davis, 3 85 143 J. M. Chalmers, 9 20 144 J. S. Chalmers, 3 0 147 W. J. Sheeley, 3 95 148 3. H. Chappell, 4 00 149 S. W. Williamson, - 7 150 R. T. Caldwell, 2 00 151 C. B. Buist, 11 20 153 Peoples & Johnson, . 42 15 154 Neeley & Green, 1 20 155 Aull & Houseal, 28 50 156 3. B. Richards, 9 75 157 Arthur Kibler, 6 25 159 H. M. Singley, 18 00 160 Jno. A. Boland, 18 25 158 Wallace & Kinard, 35 75 161 J. L. Irby, 3 30 162 Walker, Evans & Cogswell, 79 25 163 P. N. Baxter. 170 164 Wooten & McWhirter, 10 00 165 Riley McKissic, 12 50 166 J. !A Cromier, 13 45 167 3. M. Wicker, 1 00 168 B. F. Mills. 3 45 169 G. F. Stockman, 28 00 170 H. C. Wilson, 3 00 171 J. H. Smith, 3 00 172 WV. F. Sa ber. 3 .50 173 M. Reigbley, 4 50 174 W. WV. Riser, 74 1 175 " -5700 176 " "2 50 177 " "47 00 178 -:1300 179 Geo. B Cromer, :33 15 181 C. F. Boy d, expense ace't, 8 2: 183 - - qualization fees, 42 SC 184 " " jury and witness tickets, 371 9( 185 W. C. Cromer, 9 5( 188 C. F. Boyd, 2 1i 189 0 20( 190 " "45 191 R. C. May bin, 2.5 0( 192 F. E. May bin, 11 6( -193 ..S. Reid, 5 0( 194 Jas. D. H utchinison, 2 4( 195 C. &G. S.Mower, 90 62 196 D. L Clamp, 6 0( 197 Wallace & Kinard, 7 0 198 P. E. Wise, 25 00' 199 Jno. M. Kinard, 7 5( 20 . " 61 20 201 J. C. Paysinger, 3 75 202 W. B. Wise. 7 :0 203 Phillip Spotts, 12 00' 204 P. C. Smith, 12 751 205 D. B. Williams. 6 15 206 D. P. Bauknight, 2 00; 207 Jas. A. Crotwell, 11 10 20$ J. C. Clary, *,7 209 F. A. Schumpert, 5 54 210 Rob't Glym ph, 2 04) 211 Berley & Hayes, " 10 212 H. M. Singley & Co., 9 75 213 R. C. Williams, 7 i0 214 J. N. Feagle, 25 0 215 I. H. Boulware, 9 00 216 N. P. Abrams, 6 00 217 C. B. Buist, 10 50 219 F. V. Capers, 22 00 220 G. -1. Wertz, 4 90 221 J. Y..Floyd. 830 222 N. W. Gregory, 12 50 223 Gen. B. Cromer, 18 65 224 C. F. Boyd, jury and witness tickets, 7 95 225 Phillip Spotts, 12 00 226 W. W. Hodges, 2 00 227 J. C. Paysiuer, 4 23 228 Wallace & Kinard, 2 23 229 J. D. Hutchinson, 2 90 230 J. L. Dominick, 2 85 231 W. W. Riser, 11 64 232 J. C. Neel, 10 00 233 J. N. Martin, 6 00 234 W. G. Peterson, 1 00 235 C. B. Buist, 21 85 236 Peoples & Johnson, 13 35 237 Boozer & Goggans, .30 20 238 Z. F. Wright, 10 25 239 S. J. Wooten, 31 00 240 Lee W. Neel, 3 65 241 B. F. Boozer, 50 242 E. L. Hayes, 24 50 243 W. W. R:er, 12 64 244 " 102-10 245 Geo. B. Cromer, 23 90 246 Aull & Houseal, 6 25 248 Phillip Spotts. 12 00 249 J. P. & T. C. Pool, 19 25 250 C. & G. S. Mower, 78 05 251 Jos. Wood. 12 50 252 C. & G. S. Mower, 8 50 249 J. P. & T. C. Pool, 19 25 254 Wallace Kinard, 2 50 255 J. B. Fellers, 6 00 256 F. E. Maybin,. 23 50 257 P. C. Smith, 7 20 258 J. W. Nance, 6 00 259 Godfrey Harman, 6 80 260 W.B. Wise, =3 90 261 C. B. Buist, 10 50 262 Thos. W. Keitt, 4 $0 263 Jno. A. Suber, 5 00 264 J. M. Kibler, 5 00 265 Houseal & Kibler, 10 00 263 W. G. Houseal, 5 00 267 W. G. Houseal, 10 75 268 Phillip Spotts, 1 00 269 Riley M. McKissick, 1 75 270 J. H. Smith, 3 00 271 ". 7 45 272 Geo. B. Cromer, 21 40 274 C. F. Boyd, witness tickets, 2 53 275 2 50 276 " expense accour t, 7 25 277 W. C. Cromer, 3 75 278 J. A. Crotwell, 57 25 279 W. B. Wise, 7 05 280 J. B. Heller, 25 00 281 W. C. Sligh, 25 00 282 C. B. Buist, 32 80 283 P. S. Livingston, 2 50 1 284 G. Noland.Sligh, . 1:20 1 285 Bobertson & Gilder, 1 65 1 286 P. C. Smith, 4 60 1 278 P. E. Wise, 2 00 1 288 " - 2)00 289 W. W. Riser, 61 05 1 290 W. G. Houseal, 10 70 1 291 R. C. Maybin, 25 00 1 292 F. V. Capers, 3 15 1 293 A. Y. H1unter, 10 4,0 294 3Moseley Bros., 11 ..5 295 J. WV. Etberidge, 173 00 296 J. H. Smith, 2 00 T. B. Berry, 1) 00 29c 1) P. Bauknight, 5 40 299 .?'ierce Boozer, 3 35 300 Fed Brooks, 2 0(0 301 (i. C. Cruber, 3 00 .302 Christina MIinick, 27 5)4 303 Geo. A. M1inick, 3 00 304 Jos. 8. Reid, 5 00 305 Geo. B. Cromner, 21 65 306 C. F. Boyd, jury and witness I tickets, 4.5: 05 307 C. F. Boyd, 30 00 308..-.....Jury Com. fees, (J. N. Feagle), 18 20 309 D. WV. T. Kibler, 4 40 310 Jno. M1. Kinard, 64 50) 311 "~ " 00 312 N. WV. Gregory, 21 011 313 L. Stevens, 2 00 314 Boozer & Goggans, 14 75 315 Aull & Houseai, 4 50 316 31. J. Scott & Co., 3 00 317 C. & G. S. Mower, 86; 75 318 Wylie Taylor, 1 40 319 F. E. Mlay bin, 18 85 320 WV. WV. Riser, 51l 00 321 " " 0 4(4 322 Wallace & Kinard, 4 0 335 J. C. Sebumpert, '41 324 E. L. H ayes, 5). 85) 325 31arcus Spearman, 2' 45 326 Shockley Bros., 8 00I 327 WV. F. E wart, 4 00 328 J. M. H. Ruff, -10) 0 329 WV. B. Oxner, 78 330 WV. B. WVise, 4 20 331 P. C. Smithb, 12 00 332 D. S. Sarterwhite, 3 20 333 Sease & Co.. 122 25 334 J. 1K. Epps, (; 00 335 Jno. 0. Wieker, a 25 336 J. J. Kinard, 1 r 3:37 M. A. Renwick, 8 35 33$ N. R. Lester, 1 - 3:39) J. WV. Etheridge, 1040 (0P 340 Jno. WV. Smith, 1 15 341 Geo. B. Cromner,2 5 342 C. F. Boyd, 1 "5 343 - - work onP. H. 144 )' 344 "~ " witness tickets, 11 55. 345 " " expenseacct., 11 10 346 XV. B. WVise, 1. 0 347 F. E. M1aybin, -::.5 349 XV. XW. Riser, 47 "" 3.0 E. A. Scott, 70 3:3 J. H. WVilliamus, 67 3-4 J. M. Kibler, 52 70 3515 Mlinter & Jamieson, 5u 3.5; W. T. Tarrant, 12 40 357 Whbeeler & MIoseley. 4) 358 WVright Rutherford, 2 0(4 359 WV. 4.. H ouseal, 15 :1) 34.1 Arthur Kihler, 5 (45 3C2 Shockley Bros.,14 . 3J;3 R. L. Tarrant.,2S 344 D. Hipp & Co., 1 ' 366 Thomas W. Hlutchinsn 4 :307 WV. T. Davis, 368 C. B. Buist. 149 371 XV. C. Hayes, 4" 372 F. V. Capers,4 ; 373 P. E. Wise, 20 374 H. N. Auton,417 375 Sease & Co., 4 4 376 P. H. Koon. ' 377 Amianda M1iils, 4) 378 A. Hawkins,5 4 379 WV. C. Sligh, ;'~ 3s40 Jno. WVilliams,14(' 331 E. P. 31attbews, 16 3s2 J. WV. Etheridge, );5 4 353 (. M1. Singley, 244 3s4 J. P. Richardson. 6-' 385 Clatup & C'roter, 25" 386c J. M10nroe W icker, 4' 3&7 C. & (G. S. Mlower, 4 ; 388 Geo. B. (Cromer,275 3&9 Clamp & Cromer, ; 2 390 H. N. Autoni,220 391 JT C. Payingear,50 :92 S. N. Henderson, 24 00 93 C. F. Boyd, witness tickets, G 00 : 5 J. W. Etberidge, 272 50 1U (3. F. Boyd, 13 75 3)7 W. W. Hodges, 15 15 ti . . 10 00 100 3 50 101 Peoples & Johnson, 32 :0 102 Boozer & Goggans, 4: 75 0:1 Thos. E. Epting, 17 00 104 L. W. Floyd, 99 70 105 W. W. Riser, 52 50 106 Geo. E. Toale & Co., 35 15 107 A. L. Wise, 51 50 105 Cbarlton Cromer, 4 00 109 Wallace & Kinard, ; 75 110 Aull & Houseal, 10 00 111 J. M. H. Ruff, 10 00 112 Jno. D. Boozer, 75 113 P. E. Wise, 25 00 114 Jno. H. Wicker, ;7 75 115 E. H. Phillips, 40 it; R. W. Glymph, 2 (H) 117 J. Nolan Sligh, 5 60 118 Jno. F. Cromer, 00 110 Leavell & Speers, 9 70 120 .Tno. A. Cromer, 20 00 122 E. 0. Counts, 85 SCHOOL FUNDS. No. 1. N o. 1 C. E. Williams, $25 00 2 L. K. Goodwin, 20 00 :3 Lula Williams, 15 00 4 Mary A. Rice, 20 00 5 Lilian Glenn, 25 00 G L. Amanda Neel 20 00 7 Jane A. Long, 30 00 5 :0 00 9 L. Amanda Neel, 20 00 lo 31. E. Butler, 20 00 11 Lilian L. Glenn, 25 00 12 L. K. Goodwin, 20 00 :3 C. E. Williams, 25 00 14 1. J. Reeder, 15 00 15 Lula N. Williams, 15 00 16 Mamie McGraw, 20 00 17 20 00 S L. Amanda Neil, 20 00 0 Lula N. Williams, 15 00 0 Mamie McGraw, 20 00 .1 Maggie Snowden Butler, 17 00 '2 Lilian Glenn, 25 00 38 L. K. Goodwin, 20 00 !4 C. E. Williams, 23 00 5 Y. J. Reeder, 15 00 6 Jane A. Long, 30 00 L. K. Goodwiv, 10 00 C. E. Williams, 12 50 .9 Lillian Glenn, 12 50 0 Jane A. Long, 15 00 1 Y. J. Reeder, 7 50 2 Maggie S. Butler, 1:; 10 3 Lula N. Williams, 7 50 4 L. Amanda Neil, 10 00 5 Mamie McGraw, 10 00 No. 2. 1 o. 1 Kittie M. Jones, $25 00 2 Fannie J. Rutherford, 17 00 3 Geo. W. Starks, 17 00 4 Kittie M. Jones, 25 00 5 Fannie J. Rutherford, 17 00 ( Geo. W..Starks, 16 15 7 Fannie J. Rutherford, 17 00 S Kittie 31. Jones, 25 00 0 Emm% Havird, 25 00 0 Geo. W. Starks, 17 00 1 Fannie J. Rutherford, 18 70 2 Mary Boyd, 17 00 8$50 4 Emma Havird, 2 00 5 Geo. W. Starks, 18 70 6 Kittie M. Jones, 2G 25 7 Emma Havird, 27 50 S Fannie J. Boyd, 15 70 9 Kittie M. Jones, 26 25 0 Geo. W. Starks. 17 00 No. J. 1 Mamnie Scott, $22 50 2 J. Hi. Brown, 25 00 : Mamnie Scott, 223(1 4 '- "~ 22 50 5J. H. Brown, "5 00 Mamie Scott, 22 50 7 . " 11 25 g S2 50 9 Howard GafTney, 15 o0 0 J. 1-. Brown, 10 00 Xo. 4. 1 J. H. Thomas, $20 00 2 Jfames M1. Sims, 23 00 :: P. E. Herriotte, 23 00 4 Belle Phillips, 20 00' 5 Etta Lee, 25 00 g " " 25 00 7 P. E. Herrootte, 25 00 s J. HI. Thomas, 20 00 9 J. K. Hair, 25 00 0 Belle Phillips. 20 00 .1 James M. Sims, 25 00 : Emma Julian, 25 00 4 . H. Thomas, 20 on .5 S. E. D)illiard, 25 00 .Jamxes M. Sims, 12 50 7 P. E. Herrotte, 12 50 8 P. E. Herrootte, 25 00 9 J. H. Thomas, 10 00 01 J. K. .Hair, 25 00 1 " " 25 00 2 Belle Phillips, 10 00 3 -. " 20 00) 4 J. K. Hair, 9 50 5 Ea Lee, 2500 9; .. .~12 50 i Emma .Julian, 20 25 9 - - 2500 " Em ma Julian, :12 50 1 . E. Dilliard, 12 50 2 . E. Butler, 20 00 : R. K. Moon, '5 00 15 H. A. McCullough, 100 7 " 15 00 15 R. K. Moon, 8 75 9 Lila V. Boston, 25 00 to ) Lula E. .Jones, 6 25 No. 2 1 E. P. .Jones,.2 00 2 E. Lilla Ki bler, 25 III :3 essie W. Wheeler, 25 100 4 (eo. W. Dennis, 15i (Il 5 E.Lilla Kibler, :1 25 b Jnie~ Chalmers, 25 0I R K. Moon. 12 511 '8 E. P. Jones. 25 00 SBesie WX. Wheeler, 2504 o Carrie L. Wiiliams, 11 25 1 Janie C halmers, 28 ;3 s Geo. W. Dennis, 15 (I :1 R. K. Noon, 18 75 1 Carre L. William.s, 15 00) 1 L. E. WXimm, 15 00 1 E. Lilla Kibler, 2 1 . Henrietta Giauntt, 12 73 19 E'. P. JTone.'. 250) ) Besie W. XWheeler, 25 01) 21 Janie Chalmers, 2500 2 E. Lillai Kibler, 5 (00 2 R K. Moon. (50 24 Carrie L. Williams, 11 25 2'; L. E. Wimms, ~ 15 00 27 Janie Chaluers, 25 00 2 Henrietta tiauntt, 14 25 2!' E. P. Jone~s, 23 01) :;0 R. K. Moon, 18 75 31 E. Lilla Kihler, 23 00 :: Besie W. Wheeler, 25 00 : 1 Herietta Giauntt, 14 25 :34 Janie Chalmers, 25 00 3 E. P. Jones, 25 00 :346 R. K. Moon, 10 00 3S R. A. Bragg, 20 -- :3 Jno. D. Moates, 15 00 \o. G. No. 1 Annie E. Chiles, .25 00 2 A.."e H. Brown, 25 00 3 R. A. Bragg. 10 51) 4 Fannie G. Johnson, 25 00 5 Ellen Suber, 25 00 u 1amie C. Clary, 20 Oi 7 Leah H. Himes, 40 00 S J. W. White, 12 (5 9 Leah A. Moon, 18 75 10 Fannie G. Jobnson, 25 00 11 " " 25 00 12 Ellen E. Suber, 25 01) 13 Mamie C. Clary, 20 00 14 Alice H. Brown, 25 00 15 Mary L. Burton, .'5 00 1u " " 25 0 17 Alice H. Brown. 25 00 18 Mary L. Burton, 25 00 19 " " 25 00 20 V. Henry Dorroh, 21 00 21 R. A. Bragg, 20 25 22 Leah A. Moon, 15 00 23 S. E. Thompson, 25 0(1 24 Mamie C. Clary, 20 00 25 "20 00 26 Fannie G. Johnson, 25 00 27 R. A. Bragg, 15 00 2$ Mary Jenkins, 21 60 29 D. C. Senn, 17 50 30 " . 2 ;5 00 31 " 25 00 32 " " 132 50 :33 Alice 11. Brown, 25 00 34 R. A. Bragg, 9 75 35 S. E. Thompson, 25 00 36 Ellen E. Suber, 25 00 37 " " 25 00 No. 7. No. 1 Minnie E. Pitts, $25 00 2 J. H. Brown, 25 00 3 Minnie E. Pitts. 25 00 4 Carrie McDonald, 25 00 5 " " 25 (10 11 Minnie E. Pitts, 25 00 7 B. B. Bibbs, 20 00 S F. Gussie Kibler, 22 50 9 Minnie E. Pitts, 25 00 10 H. H. Ely, 15 00 11 B. B. Bibbs, 20 00 12 F. Gussie Kibler, 22 50 13 H. H. Ely, 15 00 14 Matilda Parker, 15 00 15 15 00 1+ " 15 00 17 Lewis Richard, 2 50 is " a 2 30 19 Butler W. Nance, jr,, 25 01) 20 ". 25 00 21 A. G. Pressley, 20 00 22 Andrew L. Longshore, 22 50 23 "" "2? 50 y~221 50 25 A. G. Pressley, 20 00 26 J. H. Brown, 25 00 27 Ellis & Sheppard, 44 37 28 J. J. Haltiwanger, 75 00 29 A. G. Pressley, 1( 00 No. 8. No. 1 Alice J. Lung, $25 00 2 Lula Wii:ams, 12 50 3 Geo. W. Herbert, 25 00 4 LulaW. Campbell, 30 00 5 Geo. W. Herbert, 25 00 G Lula Williams, i2 50 7 Alice J. Long, 25 00 8 J. W. White, S 60 9 Jno. C. Goggans, 2 00 10 Mamie E. Crooks, 30 00 11 Lillie W. Campbell, 30 00 12 Alice S. Williams, 10 00 13 M. W. Peurifoy, 30 00 14 3000 15 Geo. W. Herbert, 25 00 16 Alice S. Williams, 20 00 17 Lillie W. Campbell, 30 00 18 Mamie E. Crooks, 18 00 19 " 30 00 20 M. W. Peurifoy, 30 00 1. " 4 50 22 Geo. WV. Herbert, 12 50 23 Lula N. Willlams, 12 50 24 Lillie WV. Campbell, 15 00 23 Alice J. Long, 25 00 2(3 Alice S. Williams, 2(1 00 27 Lula N. Williams, (3 25 2$ Mamnie B. Crooks, :30 00 20 Alice S. Williams, 20 00 No. . 1 J1. S. Wheeler. 812 50 2 Amanda L. Williams, 25 0(1 8 Fannme Hunter, 2(1 00 4 W. A. Counts, 23 00 5 T. S. Sease, 23 0(1 6 J. B. Fellers, 29 00 7 Lizzie Robertson, 20 00 S Lillian L. Luther, 18 75) 9 Kate Mayer, 23 00 10 Mary Monts, 20 00 11 Hattie C. Pugh, 15 00 12 A. S. Williams, 2.5 00 18 L. A. White, 13 00 14 " 15 00 1 J. S. Wheeler, 8 :33 1(3 Opbelia Nates, 2 10 17 H. H. Rikard, 21 00 18 Rosella F. Chavers, 12 30 19 Rosella F. Stinson, 12 50 20 Thbos. S. Sease, 25 00 21 D. P. Wheeler, -12 30 3Jas. M. Sims, e; 5( 24 Lillian L. Luther, 2500 2 Kate 31ayer, (50 21; Ebbie M1ayer, 12 50 27 Minnie Cannon, 12 5( 2 S. A. 0. Williams, 50(1 29 F. E. Dreber, O5f) 30 Mary Traywick, 25 00 :31 F. E. Dreber, (500 :32 M1ary Travwick, 2500, 3:3 Fan~nie Hunter, 21' 00 34 Alice 0. Bowers, 23 00 1 Lizzie Robertson, 2) 00 37 Opbelia Nates, 4 1-5 38 J. S. WVheeler, 8 3-> 3 H. H. Rikard, 23 00 40 Thos. S. Sease, 25 (0( 41 Kate MIayer, 25 01) 42 Ebbie Mlayer, (3 2-' 4:3 Rosella F. Chavers, 12 Sf) 44 Hattie C. Pugh, 15 00 45 A. L. WVilliamns, 25 0(1 4; L. A. WVhite. 15 00 47 James 3M. Sims, 12 50 4 Nathan Moseley. 1 25 51 Geo. WV. Dennis, 12 a 51 Lizzie Robertson, 20 0(1 52 Fannie Hunter, 20 00 53 3ary Traywick, 25 (JO 4 F. E. Dreher, 23 00 55 D). P. WVheeler, 12 50 5 ; XW. A. Counts. 23 (sJ 57 Lillian L. Luther, 25 0') 5$ M1innie Cannon, 12 50 59 Alice ('. Bowers. 23 00) 30 ary M1iller. 12 50 (;31 12350 l;2" " 12350 ;:3 J. S. Wheeler, 77 20. 10). 1 E. L. (Griffin, 8QS 00 2 L. R. MIoon. 25 50) 3 Laura H. Whitner, 9 75 4 Lizzie Griffin. 23 75 Lillie WVerts, 23 (3' I; " -23 00I 7 WV. A. Counts, 23 '0 S L. R. M1oore. 23 "II 9 Laura H. Whitner, 1:3 00 10 Cora Dominick, 25 (ii 11 J. S. WVheeler ~ 12 511 12 Salie Kibler.' 10 00 13" " 20 00 14 Lucy E. Teague, 25 00 15 " " 2 00, 1'. "2-5 00 li Rosella F. Chavers, 00 15 ; 00 19 " 7 00 20 L. R. Moore, 25 00 21 Nathan Moseley 6 00 22 ". " c 00 23 Cora Dominick, 25 00 24 Laura H. Whitner, 1:3 00 25 Mary Monts, 20 00 21; " - 20 00 27 J. D. A. Kibler, 7 "10 2S Lillie \Verts, 25 00 29 .. 12 50 30 Sallie Kibl r, 20 00 31 Laura H. Whitner, I 75 32 J. S. Wheeler, 12 50 33 Ophelia Nates, 6 50 ;34 " li 50 35 J. S. Wheeler, 12 50 36 L. R. Mfoore, 12 50 37 Lucy E. Teague, 12 50 :38 Cora Dominick, 25 00 :39 Lizzie Grifio, 25 00 40 13 75 41 W. A. Counts, 12 50 42 Sallie Kibler, 20 00 4:3 Cora Dominick, 12 50 No. 11. No. 1 Cyrilla Rutherford, $25 00 2 W. B. Boinest, 25 00 .:3 Lola A. Teague, 25 00 4 M. E. Maybin, 12 00 5 Cyrilla Rutherford, 25 00 ( Lola A. Teague, 25 00 7 Lillie Kinard, 20 00 8 6 6 20 00 ; Cyrilla Rutherford, 25 00 10 Lola A. Teague, 25 00 11 Francis W. Higgins, 23 00 12 " '' 25 00 13 Susie A. Johnson, 12 00 14 Bettie Maybin, 12 00 15 Susie A. Johnson, 12 00 16 M. M. Bedenbaugh, 12 00 17 Frances W. Higgins, 25 00 18 Bettie Maybin, 12 00 1si W. B. Boinest, 20 00 20 " 20 00 21 Susie A. Johnson, 20 00 22 E. N. Metts, 25 00 2:3 Alice .J. Long, 20 00 24 Enoch N. Metts, 25 00 25 Alice J. Long, 14 00 20 Geo. C. Koon. 2 00 No. 12. No. 1 Louisa McKay, $30 00 2 Lillie Kinard, 18 00 3 .18 00 4 Louisa McKay, 30 00 5 " 30 00 - 30 00 7 " " :30 00 8 Lillie Kinard, 18 00 9 - -. 1S 0() 10 " 1s 00 C. F. BOYD, County Treasurer. TAMMANY HALL'S LAST VICTORY. It was Won Fifty-Six Years Ago Some Significant Facts of History. [Letter in -the New York Evening Post.] It is not a little remarkable that Tam many Hall has not had a success in its dealings with national politics in near ly sixty years-just fifty-six years, in fact. I will hastily go over the record: In 1836 it favored Martin Van Buren for President. He was nominated and elected. That was Tammany Hall's last victory. In 1840 it favored Mr. Van Buren. Mr. Van Buren was defeated. In 1844 it again favored M[r. Van Buren, and Mr. Van Buren was again :efeated. In 1848 it favored Lewis Cass. Mr. Css was nominated, but lost the elec tion. In 1852 it favored Governor Mfarey, and he was defeated. Another Demo rat was nominated and elected. In 18.36 it favored Douglas. Another Democrat was nominated and elected. In 18630 it again favored Douglas. His nomination split the party, and he re eived but thirteen electoral votes. In 1804 it favored McClellan. He was nominated, but so handicapped by a Tammany platform that he was over whelmingly defeated. In 1868 it favored Seymour against Chase, with a combination with Lib eral Republicans. Seymour was nomi nated and overwhelmingly defeated. In 1872 it va nt into the combination with the Liberal Republicans, but fa voredl Horace Greeley against Charles Francis Adams. Mr. Greeley was nonmi nated, and was overwhelmingly de feated. In 187(; it opposed thbe nomination of \r. Tilden, even to the verge of a threatened bolt. Mr. Tilden was nomi nated and elected, carrying this State by the biggest majority that had then ever been given to a Democratic candi date. In ISSO, when the whole country wanted to do justice to Mr. Tilden, Tammany Hall prevented his renomi nation by threatening a bolt. General Hancock was nominated to suit Tam many Hall, and was badly beaten. In 1884 Mr. Cleveland was nominat ed in the face of a protest from Tanm many Hall, and elected in the face of the organized bolt of a large number of its leaders. In 1888 Tammnany Hall seemed to support Mr. Cleveland with cordiality, ~nd he was defeated at the polls. Such is the record. Let aspiring politiciains study it. "Her's to the maiden of bashful fif teen, And here's to the widow of forty !" They have each reached a period in life when most females need assista 'ce in tiding thenm over the shoals which so often completely wreck their after lives. In producing regularity andl healthy action of the female organs, D)r. Pieree's Favorite Prescription stands without a peer. At a time when nature gives them increased burden, so many young girl5 have their health for life shattered. If you wish your daughter to miss those peri odical, agonizing backaches, and dizza headaches, languid and tired feelings, accompanied with rough, pimply skmi andl dull, heavy eyes, get her a bottle of Dr. Pierce's Favorite Prescription. If von have reached the later period of dager and weakness, you will need a bottle, too. See wrapper on bottle for printed guarantee. Satisfacton given n every c.se or money returned. SENATOI 31. C. AUTLEI. The Divsons of the Democracy Can Only be Healed and its Real Opinions Settled at a Primary for State Officers. To the Editor of the News and Courier: Some days ago I received the following letter: Hon. M. C. Butler, United States Senator. Washington-My Dear Sir: The political situation in South Caro lina is very serious. I desire to obtain from you an expression of your ',iews upon what course the conservative peo ple of the State should take to bring about the unity and harmony of the party, which was so rudely broken by the unnatural course of events in this State two years ago. I shall be very much obliged it you will cover the subject as iully is, in your judgment, the importance of the issues to be discussed, may require, and and wish that you would express your views without reserve. I have address ed a similar request to quite a number of prominent and intelligent gentle men in different parts of the State, and hope that you will favor me with a re ply at your earliest convenience. Yours very truly, J. C. EPHILL, Editor The News and Courier. Charleston, S. C., February 16. Sharing with you the opinion that "the political situation in South Caro lina is very serious," and realizing that it is my duty, with other citizens of the State, to do what I can to hed;,l the breaches made in the Democratic party and restore harmony and good feeling, I shall reply to your letter frankly and without reserve. In order to suggest a remedy it is first necessary to ascertain, if possible, the cause or causes of the trouble. We find the Democrats of South Carolina divided into three parts or factions. Those who support the present State Administration, those who oppose it and express a purpose to test their strength within party lines, and those who oppose it, but do not commit themselves to action within party lines. Now, to begin with, there is not .oom in South Carolina for three factions of the Democratic party-scarcely %oom for a united, solid party, confronted as it is by the common enemy, the Re publican party. If the breach continues one or more of the factions will be absorbed by the Republican party, or will absorb it. This has been the experience in almost every similar condition of political par ties, and there is no reason to assume it will not be so in our case. The question I would like to put to eyemypatriotic Democrat in the State is this: "Would you be willing to see the Republican party in power in South Carolina again in any fcrm?' Composed as it is of such a large ma jority of the colored race, could any in crement of the white race, with such a controlling constituency of the other, make it a safe depository of the ad ministration of the affairs of the State? The white Democrats of South Caro lina are not strong enough to divide. It will not do to say there is no danger of Republican supremacy in that State. Political changes in this country are sometimes sudden, often insidious, and frequently it is the unexpected that happens, and I now utter the warning -we arc in great danger of the over throw of white supremacy and the rehabilitation of the Republican piarty, if not in name, in form and substance, for a political party,whatever its name, is controlled and its policies determined by its constituency. Once destroy the Democratic party in South Carolina and you have another domiinated by the negro vote. We know what that means. Would it not be wise and patrictic in this view of tihe situation to bury past differences among ourselves, and if need be agree to disagree so thait we may get together? It is safe to assume in controversies such as are now go ing on in South Carolina, that errors andi mistakes have been committed en all sides. If this is admitted, and [ am sure no man having knowledge of the fralties of our,nature and the fallioility of human judgment will undertake to deny it, the door will be open for neu tral concessions and forbearance. During the last canvass Governor Tllman and his friends assailed with unusual vigor and pertinacity not only the political methods and polic:es of h is predecessors, but attacked their per sonal characters and motives as wyell. Charges were made wbich I believe were afterwards admitted to be svith out foundation. All thoughtful, con servative people deprecated these things at the time, and foretold evil consequences. The evil consequences have conme. The scenes were shifted, andl the precedent having been (stab lished, n.,w that the present Adruiina tration is on trial, similar methods are being pursued towards it. The friends of the Administration certainly ought not to complain o:f this, and 1 (10 not know that they do. I call attention to it to state the situation fairly and frankly, so that it may be looked squarely in the face. I call at tention to emphasize the remark that the habit of indulging in personal vitu peration,. abuse and misrepresentation is "a custonm better honored in the breach than in the observanice,'' and to express the hope that in the future it will be abandoned. I do riot wish to be understood as saying that all the abuse and vilification of the last. can vass was confined to Governor Tillman and his friends. His opponents-sonme of them-played a very lively part in the performance, but this does not and cannot justify it. Of course, if a man is assailed personally. the temptation to retort in kind is almost irresistible. I plead guilty to the habit, at times, my self, but this does not justify or make And the newspapers-why should their editors and reporters be de nounced for publishing public facts and expressing their opinions on them?. Newspapers are the vehicles through and by which news is communicated to the public, which the nublic wants. The editors and reporters, men like the balance of us, express their opinions in their editorials, and why should they not? It does not make them public enemies. What they say may be en titled to no more weight than what other mortals say, but they have a right, nay more, a duty, to give their opinions, and they are accepted or re jected as they are wise or otherwise. Why should patriotic citizens of the State, who d not approve of all the methods and policies and acts of the present Administration, be denounced as "Bourbons," aristocrats," "ring sters," etc? And why should those who approve of the methods, policies and :icts of the present Administration be denounced as "enemies to the State," "political tricksters." etc, etc' There is no sense in all this. No good, but untold harm must result from it. It would be uncandid in me to say that the present Administration is not amenable to criticism. A good many things have been done and left undone which do not meet my approval, but it is entitled to fair treatment. News papers publish severe criticisms of the Administration and they have a right to publish them. Other newspapers publish vigorous vindications of the Administration, and they, too, have a right to publish them-but abuse and vituperation never settled a controverry and never will. Political issues in a free country are settled by facts and arguments intelligently and fairly pre sented to the people. In enlightened communities such facts and arguments only are effective. Governor Tillman himself said in the beginning of his Administration he would be environed by many difficul as, that he would encounter fierce op position, critical judgment, etc., and he has not been disappointed. How much of this he ha; invited by his own course the public understands. As one of those who voted for him I enter tained the hope that, once elected and installed, he would adopt a conserva tive, conciliatory course and allay the irritation aroused by the exciting can vass. I think he had it in his power to have done so, and I sincerely regret he did not, but he is the best judge of his own actions and conduct, and I presume is prepared to stand or fall by them. This much by way of preface (a very long preface I admit) brings me to the point of suggesting a plan upon which I think we all ought to agree. Each faction, no doubt, honestly thinks it has a majority of the Demo cratie voters behind it. Majorities shift with such astonishing rapidity in this country that few things are more un ertain and deceptive. A faction or party in a majority this year may be in a hopeless minority next year. How then are we to ascertain who repres.ents a majority of the Democratic voters? I answer, by a primary elec tion. Submit the claims of every can didate to the people and let them decide at the polls who they want. Having decided in this way every Democrat in the State should and will rally to those r'eiving a majority of the votes and close up our divided ranks. Surely nobody wishing to carry out the will of the majority can object to that. Governor Tillman, desirous of vindicating his Administration, would doubtless want a fair contest :n an open field, and this method would give it to him. Other gentlemen becoming candi dates would want an equal opportuni ty to criticise him and present their laims. They, too, would be content to submit themselves to the people in this way. The people themselves cer tainly should not object. The newspa pers should not object, for it -would "furnish grist for their mills,'' and give them a chance to vindicate their move ment. Why, then, should not the State executive committe provide for a pri mary election for a~ll State officers, as is now provided for members of Congress and solicitors, and let the candidates have it out before the people? Meantime each candidate can organ ize his forces, and, the better organized, the more intelligent wi!! be the dis cussion and more satisfactory the re sult. A call has been made for a meeting of those opposed to the present Admin istration in Columbia the latter part of March, to nominate a cadidate for Gov ernor. This is rather an innovation on Democratic usage, but I know of no law against it. The example was set two years ago, and I presume any man or set of men have a right to nominate candidates. It is reassuring that the movers of this March Convention, all leading, reputable, influential, patriot ic citizens, propose to make their fight within the Democratic party and abide the result. It is to be supposed they will organize their forces thoroughly and systematically in every county, and that Governor Tillman, who is un derstood to be a candidate to succeed himself, is "looking after his fences" and will also abide the result of the canvass. A primary election will compose our difleulties, and in my judgment noth ing else will. A pologizing for the length of this lettter, I am truly yours, M. C. BUTLER. Washington, D. C., Feb. 27. Smith & Wearn are closing out their stock at a discount. There is no hum bug about it. Read their advertise COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 0. K. The Attorney General Decides that the Office Survives and will Continue to Exist Until Abolished by Act of the Legislature. LSpecial to News and Courier.] COLE3MBI A, March 3.-The complica tions arising over the neglect of the last Legislature to provide any new system of county government and now the offices are hereafter to be filled have been settled so far as the Attorney Gen eral's opinion and the Governor's de cision can settle it. The Democratic State committee referred the matter to the Governor, with a request that he ask the opinion of the Attorney Gen eral. Governor Tillman addressed the fol lowing inquiry to Attorney General McLaurin: "The Hon. J. L. McLaurin, Attorney General-Dear Sir: It has been called to my attention that there exists in the public mind a doubt as to the office of county commissioner, and in order to set, the matter at rest, I would ask that you give me your written opinion as to what effect, if any, the passage of the constitutional amendment abolish ing that office has upon the existing boards. "Do they hold over till the Legislature directs some other form of county gov ernment or will it be lawful to elect a new board next November? "B. R. TILLMAN, Governor." Attorney General McLaurin, not withstanding he is hard at work with Judge Melton preparing the answer in the Alexander-Agricultural hall mat ter, has prepared his opinion on this interesting question. TH1E COMMISSIONERS ARE IN IT, says Mr. McLaurin, and, averaging ten aspirants to the county, there will be a chance for some 350 more candidates to seek the glories of office. Mr. McLaurin writes as follows: "To His Excellency, Governor B. R. Tillman-Dear Sir: Your letter of yes terday's date has been received, in which you ask for the opinion of the Attorney General as to what effect, if any, :he passage of the constitutional amendment abolishing the office of county commissioner has upon the ex isting boards, and also if the present officers hold over or are new ones to be elected. Section 19 of Article 4 of our Constitution provided for a board of county commissioners to be elected biennially and defines the general juris diction of such boards. "An amendment to the Constitution providing for the repeal of this section was submitted to the qualified electors of the St..e at the general election in 1890, and a majority voting in favor of the repeal, the usual Act ratifying the amendment to the Constitution was passed at the first session of the next General Assembly. "It is certainly a proper attribute of iegislative power to provide suitable machinery for the conduct of county affairs. Any doubts existing on the points in question, I am satisfied, have arisen from a misapprehension of what is the effect of the State Constitution on legislative power. -"The Constitution of the States are declarations of negative powers, while that of the United States is a grant of affirmative power. We look in the Con titution of the United States for grants of legislative power, but in the Consti tution of the State to ascertain if any limitation has been imposed on the complete power with which the legis lative department of the State was vested in its creation. [Cooley on Con. Law.] "The section of theConstitution which was repealed was simply of an a.ffirma tive legislative character and the Leg islature would have power to create the present board without any constitu tional authority, or to have provided some other system of county govern ment, and the statute law, as it now stands, is not in conflict with the Con stitution. The constitutional restric tion referred to operates to prevent the Legislature from altering the scheme of county government except in con formity w ith that provision, and the amendment striking out that provision leaves to the legislative power an un limited and unrestricted control over the county governments. This restric tion being removed the Legislature may now, in its wisdom, provide such a system as may be deemed best calcu lated to promote the welfare of the people. "'In all such cases no intention to abrogate previous existing laws can be resumed in the absence of expression to that efl'ect.' [Enlich on Statutes.] "I understand the rule as laid down by Cooley and other authorities to be in substance that when 2 atute has been passed by the Legislature with in its general legislative powers, but in pursuance of an affirmative -direction in the Constitution, the repeal of this direction will not necessarily operate to repeal the statute, but the validity of the statute will be referred to the general legislative power. "It is, therefore, my opinion that the State law upon the subject of the coun ty commissioners is in full force and not abridged or repealed in any way by the constitutional amendment, and that the term of the present officers will end upon the election and qualifi cation of their successors. The elec tion of these oificers under this con struction of the law will, of course, take place at the usual time for hold ing the election." "JOHN L. McLAUmsN, "Attorney-General." The decision will settle the anxiety of very many aspirants for.a $300 job.