The Laurens advertiser. (Laurens, S.C.) 1885-1973, October 08, 1895, Image 1
VOL. XI.
tatilutional Convention.
A BUSY AND EVENTFUL WEEK.
DUpeniary, Divorce, Factories and
Suffrage.
TIN-: IMSPJON'S A It V QUESTION.
'I be Legislature Ik Given Three
Option* In !?? .?Uli;; Willi the Liquor
I'j <>iil. in < illl l'luio Dar-rootue Nut
Oue of Them.
Whon tbo convention reassembled
it dived into the vitally important mat
ter of incorporating tbo dispensary
law into the constitution.
A motion to indefinitely postpone
Mr. Clayton's substitute was tbo pond
ing q-iestion. This substitute was
ruad as follows :
" In the e-xoroise of the police power
tbu general * assembly Bhall have no
authority to license tiio sale of intoxi
cating liquors or beverages by porsons
or corporations within this State.
The general assembly may prohibit
the manufuoture and sale of intoxioat
injr liquors and beverages within the
Stiur, or may authorizo and empower
State and county olttoors, buth or
either, under the authority and in tbo
namo of tho State, to buy in any
market and Bell and retail within tho
State intoxicating liquors and bover
agos in auch packages and quantities,
under such rules and regulations, as it
deems expedient."
Mr. Clayton having returnoJ, made
a vigorous spocch iu support of bis
substitute, covering the points bo
elaborated last week. He wanted the
possibility of the return of tho bar
room nailed now, oocu acd for all.
Mr. Farrow then got tho floor and
procoeded to make a vigorous speech,
dealing largely with the police powers
of a State. What these powers were
tho courts must decide.
Some question aroso In tho midst of
Mr. Farrow's speech as to what had
become of tho amendment dent up a
few days ago by Senator Tillman to
bo road, providing for licenses for
liquor selling on tlio dispensary plan
incase thoeupromo court of the United
States held that the State had no
"*'ght to sell liquor. Tho matter after
a lung wrangle, was straightened out.
Things woro terribly mixed, and it
took an ondleas? amount of talk to tell
where tho oonvontlon was at.
Mr. Farrow coutiuued, saying as
betweon tho scheme proposed by Sena
tor Tillman and prohibition ho would
support the former.
Senator It. B. Watson believed that
all otbc questions were small in com
Earisen with the liquor question,
liquor was something to debuueb the
whole land. He gave somo forcible
statistics. A half million people were
making aud selling the stulT. He bad
been glad that South Carolina bad
taken a few steps forward to stop the
salo of this damnablo stuff, calculated
to make all men villains and murd?rers.
If all the money that goes to this evil
could go toother things there would
be no suffering. He had. lived to
educate ono little community to think
it disreputable to handle the stutT.
Who could estimate the magnitude of
the evil V Yet they tell us not to have
It shut otf. If our dispensary is knock
ed up, don't give us back the barrooms.
He was ashamed of some of the cities;
debauching their people to pay taxes,
and ruining the people utterly. He
cited the state of affairs in GreenviHo
and Charleston prior to tho Introduc
tion of the dispefisary system. Ho
was glad South Carolina had taken
I the first stride in the right direction.
He was glad the dispensary put tho
stuff up in as unattractive a shape as
possible, and he was glad that It was
selling no more of it than possible.
Mr. Clnjton wanted to allow a post
ponement till tomorrow in deference
to Senator Tillman. This was because
of tbo misunderstanding about the
printing of Senator Tiilman's amond
meat.
Mr. Patterson wanted to hoar tho
touch talked of Tillman amendment
read. He was not willing to indefinite
ly postpone the Clayton Substitute un
less SenatorNTillinau's amendment cov
ered ail tho requirements.
Mr. Parier said they had hoard
enough debate; thoir minds were made
up and they know how to voto; it was
best to decide the matter.
It was then shown, after Mr. Hen
derson had called for the previous
question, that it was an absolute
necessity to get tho Clayton substitute
indefinitely postponed before the con
vention could get Senator Tillman's
amendment bofore It.
Mr. Wilson, ovidontly laboring under
a misapprehension as to the status of
affairs, took issue with this statement.
He said, in tho ooursu of his remarks,
replying to Mr. Sheppard, that he
would like to know whether the
iournal or tho gontleman from lOdgo
lold was correct.
i Mr. Sheppard?(with groatemphasis)
?The gentleman from Kdgefiold is
right, as ho always is.
Mr. Sheppard statod that it was not
his purpose to thwart or confuse the
friends of the dispensary. He simply
wished to got the amendment of Sena
tor Tillman boforo the house.
Senator Tillman then rose and stated
in emphatic language tbut ho hoped
the dispensary's friends would not bo
stampedod by any such ideas as somo
of tbom wore advancing, .Governor
Sheppard had stated the matter fully.
The roil was called ou the motion to
* indefinitely postpone tho Clayton roso
tion. The motion prevailed by tho
following vote ;
Yeas?Aldrich, Alexander, Ander
son, Asho, Atkinson, Barry, Burton,
Bates, Bellinger, Berry, Bono, Bowen,
Brlce, J, S.; Brico, T. W.; Carver,
Cooper, DoHay, Donnis, Douglass,
Doyle, Dudloy, Kvane, VV. P.; Farrow,
Field, Fitch, Floyd, Fraser, Gage,
Gamble, Garris, Garry, Gil land. Glenn,
J, Glenn, J. P.; Goodlng, Graham,
^gQray, Harris, Harrison, Hay, Hayns
Mrorth, Hjmphlll, Henderson, D S.
Wjfiehry, Hiera, Hodges, Bowel I, Hutson;
4rby, Johnson, T, K.; Johnstone, Georget
Jones, Wlllo; Koitt, Konnody, E. J.,
Kennedy, J. W.j Klugh. L,ee, Low;
man, AfcDorraotto, McGowan, Mc
, Kuge?. MoMakln, Matthews, Miller,
i Mitchell, Nathans, Nicholson, Oliver,
\ Otts, Parier, Patterson, Patton, Peake,
V Prince, Ragsdale, Red f earn, Rogers,
1 Rosborough, Rowland, Sheppard,
H Sloan, Smith, A. J.( Smith, Jeremiah ;
l?roith. It. P.; Smith, W. C; Sprott,
?gtokes, Stribllng 5 Sullivan, Taylor,
^TlHman. a lt.; Tillman, G. D.; Tlm
,mx-iiian, vonKolniU, Waters, Wells,
Wharton, Whlpper, White, A. H.:
\Whlte, S. P.; Wiggins, Wilson, W. Ii.;
Wink ler,?Total 102,
Nays?Bowman, Hreaxeale, Ruist,
Byrd, Cantoy, Clayto?, Connor, Cun
ningham, Ellorbe, H?mo), Henderson,
D. S.; Heuser, MoCalla, MoCaslan, Mo
Cown. MoWhite, Moaros, Montgomery,
J. !>.; Montgomery W. J.; Moore, Mor
rison, Parrott, Perrttte, Busseil,
Smalls, Smoak, Staekhouse, Talbert,
Wateon, Wigff, Wilson, Stanyarne:
Wood ward. Total?32.
Mr. George Johnstone offered au
amendment to strike out in the report
all that portion referring to the dhv
pensary method. He Bald that he felt
that he would not be doing his duty
unless he should submit this proposl
tlon, although he well knew the tem
per of the convention. It was tabled
on motion of Senator Tillman, four
noes being heard.
Senator Tillman then offered his
amendment as follows : Provided,
That no license shall be granted to soil
alooholic beverages in less quantltieH
than one-half pint, or to ?eil them
between sundown and sunrise, or to
Bell them to be drunk on the premises ;
and, provided, further, that the
general assembly shall not delegate
the power to iscue licenses to soli the
? came to any municipal corporation."
It was put to the house, but tho voto
being closed, a division was demanded.
. It was allowed and the amendment
j was adopted by a vote of 87 to 2U, Mr.
Clayton being among those voting for
it.
I Tho word " intoxicating" was strick
en out wherovor it ooourod in the sec
tion as amended, and the word " alco
holic " was substituted. This was done
on motion of Senator Tillman.
Mr. Bellinger got an amendment
through aftor much argument to allow
municipal as well as State and county
oilicers to buy and sell in the name of
the State with the restrictions pro
scribed.
Mr. Wilson olTorod an amendment
that was in substance the same as Mr.
Clayton'*. Senator Tillman. he said,
was afraid of tho United States su
premo court. He was not. He wantod
barrooDiB biottod out of tho State for
ever.
Senator Tillman said his friend was
a good lawyer and ho was not. He
told exactly what his amendments
meant. All that they had to do was
to close barrooms without tying tholr
bands.
Mr. Rogers said that any ono of the
three things provided for in the resolu
tion as it stood would produce tho re
sults of tho dispensary law. We've had
the effect of the dispensary In Marlboro
for 40 years, and uuder that, as under
the dispensary, there was always an
ample supply of liquor.
This brought on a little tilt between
Mr. Rogers and Tillman, causing Mr.
Hogers to tell Tillman to constrain
himself for a whilo.
Mr. Parrot roso and the conveution
smiled. Ho tnado quite a opocoh on tho
mutter, saying that they should not
dodge the issue.
Mr. Prince statod that this was
simlpy the Clayton proposition over
again.
Mr. Wilson said tho otbor was not a
clear-cut voto.
Mr. Wilson then trlod to spoak, but
every momont questions were pro
pounded to him, Senator Tillman head
in;.' the procossionof oxaminers.
Mr. Henderson moved to table tho
Wilson ameudmcut and this was done
by an overwhelming vote.
Mr. Connor offered an amendment,
which was tabled, that dispensers could
be elected by tho people, or by tho
General Assembly.
A verbal amendment offered by Mr.
Gary was adopted.
Mr. Robert R. Hemphill then offered
the following amoudment, which was
read amid a roar of laughter and killed
so quickly that he scaroolv realized it.
" And tho General Assembly shall en
act a law making the drinking of in
toxicating liquors a misdemeanor."
Mr. Farrow, when the section was
about to bo put tooa final vote, moved
to reconsider tho vote whereby the
amendment of Mr. Johnstone had boon
tabled. He said that his desire was
to have his voto recorded as against
lotttug tho dispensary go into tho con
stitution, and there wore others thoro
in like condition.
After some talk the roll was called
ou a motion to table Mr. Johnstone's
amendment, and the vote resulted as
follows :
Yeas?Alexander Ashe, Atkinson,
Barry, Barton, Bates, Bellinger,
Berry, Bobo, Bowon. Bowman, Brea
z jale, Brlco, T. W.; Bulst, Byrd, Can
toy, Carver, Clayton, Connor, Cunning
ham, DeHay, Dennis, ?ouglass, Doyle,
Dudley, KUerbo, Kvans, W. ?.; Field,
Floyd, Fraser, Garris, Gary, Glenn, J.
L.; Glenn, J. P.; Gooding, Graham,
Gary, Bainel, Barris, Hay, Hayns
worth, Hemphill, Henderson, D. S.;
Henderson, Wm.; Hiera, Hodges, Hou
ser, Hutuou, Irby, Johnson. T. E.;
Jones, Wille ; KeitV.Kennedy, J. W.,
Lowman, McCalla, McCaslan, McCown,
McDermotte, MoKagon, MoMakln, Mc
Whlto, Matthows, Mearcs, Miller,
Montgomery, J. D.; Montgomery, W.
J.; Moore, Morrison, Nicholson, Otts,
Parlor, Parrott, Patterson, Peake,
Perritto, Prince, Ragsdalo, Rodfearn,
Rogers, Rowland, Russell, Sheppard,
Sloan, Smith, A. J,; Smith, Jeremiah ;
Smith, W. C; Smoak, Sprott, Stack
house, Stokes, Stnbllng, Sullivan, Tal
bort, Taylor, Tillman, B. R.: Timmer
man, Wat;rs, Watson, W?lls, Whar
ton, White, A. H.J Wiggins, 'Wilson,
Stanyarne ; Wilson, W. B.; Wiqkler?
105,
Nays?Aldrlch, Anderson, Brlce, J.
S.; Farrow, Fitch, Gago> Gllland, Ho
rt oil, .forvoy, Johnstone, George;
Klugh, L,ee, McGowan, M itched, Na
thans, Oliver, Patton, Smalls, Smith,
R. F.; Tillman, G. D.; VonKolnltz,
Whipuor, Wtiito, S. F..; Wigrir?24.
Mr. Doyle offered an amendment to
decide the question whether the State
sell liquor lor prolit or not. A roll oall
wii?< secured after muuh trouble, and a
lively running debate. The vote re
sulted as follows, being tukon on tho
direct question :
Yeas?Alexander, Anderson, Asho,
Atkiuson, Uarton, Berry, Brico, J. S.;
Buist, Con"or, lX?ylo, Holler be, Fcrrow,
Fitch, Fr?ser, Gage, Glonn. J. L.; Bon
derson, D. S.; Houdor, Hutson, Jervey,
Johnson, T. iE}.; Johnstono, George;
Leo, Montgomery, W. J.; Nathans,
Oliver, Ott, Peak, Bagsdaic, Smalls,
Smith, Jeremiah; Smith, It. F.; Srooak.
Stackhouse, Stribllng, Tillman, G. D.;
Watson, W?lls, Whlppor, Whiti., A.
IL; White. S. K.; Wigg, Wiggins, Wil
son. W. B.?Total?45. ?
Nays?Aldricb, Burry, Bates, Bollin
gor, Bobo, Bo won, Bowman, Breazoale,
byrd, Cantoy, Carver, Clayton, Cooper,
Cunningham, DeBay, Dennis, Doug
lass, Dudloy, Kvans, W. D.\ Field, Gar
ris, Gary, Glonn, J. E\: Good log, Gray,
Harris, Harrison, Hay, Haynsworth,
Hemphlll, Henderson, Wm.; Henry,
Hiors, Hodges, Howcll, lrby, Jones,
Wilie; Koltt, Kennedy, J. W.; Klugb,
Lowman, MoCalla, McCaslan, MoCown,
MoDermotto, McGowau, McKagen, Mc
Makln, McWhito, Matthews, Meares,
Miller, Montgomery, J. D.', Moore,
Morrison, Nicholson, Parlor, Patter
son, Patton, Porrltto, Prince, Rod
fearn, Jtogers, Rosborough, Rowland,
Russell, Sheppard, Sloan, Smith, \ J.;
Smith, W. C.;Sprott, Stokes, Sullivan,
Talbert, Taylor, Tillman, B. R.; Tlm
merman, Waters, VYharton, Wilson,
Stanyarno ; Winklor -Total 84.
Mr. Klugh offered a Bubstitut6 for
the whole eeotion after a motion to
adjourn had been voted dosvn. It was
practically the same as the amended
section. Mr. Klugh had considerable
to say on this substitute. He wanted
a direct vote on prohibition or dispen*
sary.
Senator Tillman raisod the point
that it was another dress on'the samo
baby. Mr. Klugh was ruled out of
order.
Tho whole section was then adopted
as amended j and it had the parlia
mentary clincher Dut on it by Mr.
Henderson. As it passsed to a third
' reading it is as follows :
Section 14. In the exercise of the po
lice power the General Assembly shall
1 have the right to prohibit tbo manu
1 faoture and sale and retail of alcoholio
liquors or beverages within tho State ;
the General Assembly may license per
sons or oorporations to manufacture
and sell and retail alcoholic liquors or
beverages within tho State under such
rules and restrictions as it deems
propor ; or tho General Assembly may
prohibit the manufacture and sale and
retail of alcoholio liquors and beverages
within tho State, and may authorize
and empower State, county and muni
cipal officers, under tho authority and
iu tho namo of the Stute to buy m any
market and retail within tho State
liquors and boverages in such packages
and quantities under such rules und
regulations us Is deemed expeuiont:
Provided, that no license shall bo
granted to soil alcoholic beverages in
less quantities than one-half pint; or
to sell them between sundown and sun
rise ; or to sell them to be drunk on the
premises. And provided, further, that
the General Assembly shall not dele
gate the power to issuo licousos to
sell tho samo to any municipal corpora
tion.
Tho article, with amendments, was
then irlven a third roadlng and sent to
tbo committee on style and ruvlslon,
In otherwise tho same shape as it pass
ed its second reading.
THK DIVORCE QUESTION.
Tho Convention Decides Against Di
vorces in this State lor Any Cause.
The debate in regard to granting di
vorces in South Carolina is one of tho
most interesting and perhaps the
ablest of all iu the constitutional con
vention. The umondinent offered by
Mr. Henderson, of Aikou, was under
consideration, which proposed to
grant divorces on tho g* ound of adul
tery alone, and this amendment was
strongly urged.
Mr. Henderson in speaking on the
subject said that wo ought to boar in
mind that tho marriage ceremony is
simple, the bouediotion pronounced
upon the contract by tho man of God.
When tho contract is broken tho inno
cent party should be allowed to have
redress. When there is a wrong tho
law should furuish a remedy. No mau
can gainsay the fact that adultery is
wrong. We should have tho manhood
to put in the fundamental law a reme
dy for such a wrong as that. Tho
remedy here suggested is hodged
around by all restrictions to prevent
its abuse. As to tho opening the flood
gates of abuse, tho only way to change
this provision, if it should be placed iu
the constitution, is to have it changed
through tho machinery of another
convention and this is guarantee
enough that abuses will not come in.
If you don't grant divorces for this
ground, 1 bolievc, ho said, you placo a
premium on adultery. Wo can't shut
our eyes to the fact that iu every
county of tho State there uro good
women who should bo relieved from
the bands uniting them to adulter
ous men and it was in their behalf he
appealed.
Senator B. R. Watson then took
tho floor and proceeded to make one of
the most feeling and forcible speeches
that was delivered during tho day
against the granting of a divorce in
any manner. He wanted tho constitu
tion to stamp out tho possibility even
of a divorce ever being granted
iu the Stato. Some of bis references
to tho agony caused in homos by pa
rading of family troubles in courts
were touching indeed. Ho said his
heart bled for what tho women had to
bear in some cases, but it was hotter
for them to bear such things for tho
sake of their children. He held up u
Bible and said this Scripture was clear
as it could bo, Tho majority of tho
people of South Carolina were be
lievers in tho Bible. He read what
tho Bible said. Do this and you will
shock the sensibilities of hundreds of
Christians all over tho Stato.
Dr. Timmorman asked if the theo
logians wore not divided on tho mean
ing of tho passages in tho Bible.
Sonator Watson replied that they
wore as to what Matthew meant, but
Mark and Luke mudo it clear.
Mr. Jervey on behalf of the commit*
teo explained that tho section as re
ported by the committee neither pre
scribes or prohibits divorces, but sim
ply loft it to the Legislature. Sovoral
resolutions were presented to t he com
mittee on either side. The committee
rejected all and ,it was reeommendod
that tho law stund as it is. Wo advo
cate that the Legislature shall he put
in tho position to keep up with tho
progress of tho age. Lot them meet
tho exigencies of the occasion. It is a
matter of pride that although the con
stitution permits the Legislature to
provide for divorcos it has novor had
occasion to do so. As to tho morits of
tho case ho favored divoreo with
proper restrictions?that is for the one
cause of adultovy.
Mr. W. C. McGowan then made one
of tho most thoroughly "eloquent argu
meats heard on any matter since tbo
convention assembled. Mr. McGowan
said that the only roal argument made
against the schemo to have no divorce
was made by the gentlemaa from Ai
ken. " Ho said that this plan was put
ting a premium on adultery. I deny
that. Exactly the reverse is true.
Turn loose " married womon without
husbands" in acommuaity, with all the
liberties of a married woman and with
none of the restraints of the unmarried
womun, and you would have no end of
adultery. Put this proposition to tho
people and you will bo snowed under
40 to 1. Ho was proud to livo In so
unique a State in respect to the sanc
tity of tho marriago law If this was
sontimont, ho, for ono, was willing to
stand upon it. It was hotter for so
ciety at largo that thoro should bo no
dlvorco at all. Onco lot down the bars
and there is qo tolling whoro it will
epd. His friend Farrow had argued
ably and well of tho effect of such a
prohibitory law on foreign divorces,
but that had nothing to do with this
convention granting divorces.
Mr. W. J. Montgomery said that
Mr. Henderson's substitute dues not
put in tho constitution anything that
would be at war with public senti
ment. It prescribes that if tho Legis
lature provides any law for divorce It
shall bo hedged about with proper re
strictions. The law as it now stands
shuts out the good women of tho Stute
from redress in case of adultorons hub
bands. They should bo relieved from
the criminal conduct of wiokod and
designing men, As far as abuse of tho
law is concerned, he bellevod gentle
tnon bogged tho question when t i i - ->
referred to the groat abuses common
in Other States, for the amendment
makes it impossible for any suoh thing
to happen in this State.
Mr. Shoppard Baid that ho was grat
ified at the high plane on which the
discussion, had been plaood, and the
eloquence of it was worthy of South
Carolina in h?r palmlost days. There
is no proposition hero to establish a
divorce law. HJvor slnoo 1808 wo have
bad a provision authorizing divorces,
but we bave had no divorce law. If
this provision is adopted It will be a
long time before we will have one if at
all it is horrible as a matter <>' law
tbat a child bo legitimate in ono State
and under the band of bastardy in an
other. And that is tho way it is now.
There are matters of legislation that
should be common and It Is almost cer
tain that Congress will pass a law
making divorces one of them. When
Congress enacts a national divorce
law the Legislature should be able to
onact laws conformable to it. Even if
Congress has no power to pass a dlvorco
law, it has power to mako legislative
enactments uniform in tho States. He
believed in submitting it to the people.
If they wunt, let them have the power
to put a divorce law in tho Statute
books.
Mr. Hutson thought, that if in tho
judgment of the convention divorces
shou'd not bo granted, Mr. Shoppard's
argument would fall to the ground.
The advocates of divorces must show
that they are necessary for morality,
that thoy tend to o'.ev&to Society.
They have failed to sustain either of
these positions.
Mr. liroazoale did not believe that
tho time would como when divorces
would ho necessary. He rather bo
lioved that, wo aro growing bettor and
bettor. Ho was opposed to a divorce
law not only on account of morality,
but as a tnattor of economy. Nearly
every session of the Legislature for
the past ten years has had a divorce
bill before it, and to prevout this ho i
favored no divorco in the constitution.
Mr. McWhito said that ho had for
several years while in tho Legislature
advocated divorces. The command
ment against committing adultery was
sufficient justification for tho adoption
of tho amendment. Men and women
have gone to other States, gotten di
vorces, returned hero and remarried
and are now living in bigamy because
no protection has boon thrown around
them.
Mr. Bowman, in answering Lieuten
ant Governor Tim merman's speech of
tho night boforo, whon he read tho
views of several eminent Baptist min
isters fehowing that divorces wero
Scriptural, read directly opposite
opinious from Dr. Lansing Burrows
and tho lato Dr. Jas. C. Furman, both
of whom were eminent Baptists.
Mr. Glonn wanted to know whether
divorces could bo granted under tho
constitution oven if the Legislature
made no provision for them. Mr.
Henderson and Mr. Sheppard both
said that they could not.
Tho voto was then taken on Mr.
Bowman's amendment prohibiting di
vorces on any ground in the State.
The ayes and noes wore called, and re
sulted in tho adoption of the amend
ment by 8<i to 49.
Yeas : Aldrieb. Alexander, Asho,
Austin, Barton, Bates, Bohre. Berry,
Bobo, Bowman, Breazealo, J. s. Briee,
Buist, Byrd, Cantoy, Carver, Connor,
Cooper, Cunningham, Dent, Douglas,
Doyle, Dudley, Ellcrbe. Floyd, Gary,
Gilland, J. P. Gienn, Gooding, Cray,
(Junter, Hamol, Harris, Harrison,
Hay. Haynsworth, Henry. Hiers
Heuser, Howoll, Hutsou, Irby, T. E
Johnson, Wille Jones, Klugh. Lee,
Lowman, Lybrand, McCalla, McCown,
MoDermotte, McGowan, Matthews,
Mearos, MltoheU. Moore, Nathan,
Otts, Parlor, Parrott, Patterson, Pat
ton, Perritte, Rod fearn, Rowland,
Sloan. A. J. Smith, Jeremiah Smith,
R. F. Smith, W. C. Smith, Smoak,
Sprott, Stribling. Talhort, G. D. Till
man, Von Konlitz, .Waters, Watson,
W?lls, Wbarton, A. H. White, S. E.
White, Stanyame Wilson, Winkler?
80.
Nays : Anderson, Atkinson, Barry.
Bowon, T. VV. Briee, Dennis, W. D.
Evans, Farrow, Field, Fitch, Eraser,
Gage, Garris, J. L. Glenn, Graham,
Hemphill, D. S. Henderson, Win. Hon
derson, Hodges, Jervey, Georgo John*
stono, Keitt, ii. J. Kennedy, J. W.
Kennedy, McMakin, McWhite, Miller.
J. D. Montgomery. W. J. Montgomery,
Morrison, Nicholson. Peake, Ragsdale,
I. R. Reed, Rogers, Rosborough, Shop
pard, Smalls, Stackhouse, Sullivan,
Taylor, B. R. Tillman, Timmerman,
Wnipoer, Wigg, W. B. Wilson, Wood*
ward--4l?.
Senator Tillman then offered an
amendment to add tho words, "but the
courts of this Stato shall recognize
and give full credit to the judgment of
the courts of other States In divoroo
cases." Ho said wo have had portray
ed tho evils of children being born in
legitimacy in other States, while
thoy are legally bastards in an
other. \ believo it wus carried
to the United States courts, he said,
they could got redtess. It Is the fun
damental law of the country that the
act of one State shall bo recognized in
other States. It is a matter of simple
justice. It's an injustice for a woman
to get a divorco out of the Stato and
come back bore and claim a right to
part of tho property of her husband.
Mr. Patten said that ho would voto
against tho amendment. Ho would
rather vote for Mr. Henderson's
amendment. Under tho Tillman pro
vision our courts will have to recog
nize divorces granted in other States
for tho many common and Godless rea
sons that prevail. That will he tho
Inevitable result of that amendment.
It makes tho divorce laws of oi,hor
States operate immediately in our
State and if wo are to have divorces at
all let us have a law of our own.
Mr. McGowan said he thought tho
amendment was surplusage. If both
parties are under tho jurisdiction of a
court our courts aro bound to recog
nize such divorces. Mr. Klugh offered
as a substitute that the General As
sembly may legitimatize the children
of parents divorced in another State.
Mr. Patton moved to lay tho motion
on tho table.
Senator Tillman said tho object he
desired to attain wus to give relief to
innoceut children. Wo don't want a
married woman olthor to run off and
got a divorco and have dower in hor
husband's land.
Mr. Henderson again offered his
amendment as a substitute for tho
whole matter. This wan ruled out of
order, Mr. Klugh's amendment was
voted down.
Mr. Bowman moved to lay Senator
Till man's amendment on the table,
which was adopted.
Mr. W. L). l?>ans oflored an amend
ment ulmiliar to Senator Til I man's and
it was also voted down.
The section was then adopted as
amended by Mr. Bowman, which
makes it read that divorces from tho
bonds of matrimony shall not bo grant
ed'by the courts of this Stato.
THE FACTORY TOWNS.
1 lie Convention Decides Against
Compulsory Incorporation?A De
tent lor Senator lillnmn.
Mr. D. S, Henderson culled up tho
report of tho committee on municipal
corporations on tho sections recom
mitted to thorn- it read as follows;
" Tho committee on municipal cor
porations and police regulations, to
whom was recommitted sections l and
2 of tho article proposed by them, res
gpeotfully report that* they have care
fully considered the same, and re
commend that said sections as amended
by the oonveatlon do paa* with the
following, proviso to be added at the
end of section 2: Provided, That
nothing in sections 1 and 2 of this
article be construed as prohibiting tho
general assembly from providing for
the Incorporation of the manufactur
ing towns of this State, under such
rostricttons and regulations as shall
protect the rights of the citizens and
prevent unjust oncroaehments upon
property."
Mr. 13. R. Tillman offered this sub
stitute : " Provided, That a class to
bo known as the manufacturing towns
shall be provided by tho general as
sembly, and shall be incorporated
whenever tho population of such a com
munity shall number 1,000, under such
restrictions and regulations as shall
protect the rights of and prevent un
just encroachments upon the property
of the citizens. In such towns no pro
perty qualifications shall bo required
to voto in municipal eloctlons lor of
noera."
This procipitated the debate of the
Mi. Tillman explained hie
The manufac turing towns w?ro practi
cally owned by the company. As the
law stood tho citizens?employees of
the mills?could not obtain u charter
or have the town incorporated if tho
factory presidents objected. If they
petitioned for a charter against the
wishes of tho bosses they would be
told to " get out." He wanted to put
it in such shape that wheu a factory
town reached a cortain size it would
bo incorporated.
Mr. Johnstone asked whethor Mr.
Tillman would incorporate a town
against tho will of its inhabitants.
Mr. Tillman?I want to force an In
corporation when tho towns reach 1,000
inhabitants. If they have to sign a
petition to bo incorporated they will
bo told by the mill owners: "Sign
that and you must got out," aud you
know it.
Mr. Johnstono (with great emphasis)
?Mr. President, I ujiso to ask a cour
teous question, and i hope I asked it
in a courteous manner, and I do pro
test against tho kind of answer I have
received. The gontloraan has no right
to impute such knowledge or motives
to me or any ono upon this floor. I
earnestly protest against it.
Mr. Tillman?I meant no reflection,
und if anything I said was so construed
I withdraw it.
Mr. Johndtone?I am very happy to
hoar tho guntloman mako that de
claration.
Mr. Prince considered himself com
petent to speak for factory employes.
Ho 'ived umong factories, had friends
and relatives employed in them und
he knew thoy did not wish this kind of
legislation. Speaking for the factories
of Anderson and Greonvlllo counties,
Mr. i'rinco assorted that they were
tho best governed communities in the
State. Their schools were open for
nine, ton, and if they wated thorn thoy
could have them for olevon mouths
in the year. This convention, it
seemed to him, was inclined to bo
paternal. The other day they wore
trying to protect the women, now they
wanted to protect a certain class of
laborers.
Tillman?What kind of government
is that of tho factory towns, if it is not
iho most paternal? They are whito
slaves, that's what they are.
Mr. Prince?Those in my county are
manly citizens und thoy would spurn
the imputation that thoy were ruled
by any man. If these people uro not
free and independent I would like
some gentleman on the Moor to say so.
Mr. Stanyurno Wilson?I never saw
u class of people living under such op
pression as tho factory people of Spar
tanburg.
Mr. Prince- I was speaking of those
people in the factories of Anderson
and Greenville, who would scorn to bo
considered slaves. I regret very much
to know that the same spirit does not
prevail among thoso of Spartuuburg,
as indicated by my friend.
Mr. Prince thon declared that if this
amendment was passed it would bo
tho death knell of factories in South
Carolina. Not because it would have
uny effect upon tho government of
thoso towns, but it would frighten off
northern capital. It would not ac
complish what it was seoking to do
and would result In driving away
thoso who had money to invest.
Mr. Tillman asked Mr. i'rinco if ho
was frilling to have capital come hero
under conditions of white slavery.
Mr. Prince replied in tho negative
und declared no factory president in
tho county that ho camo from dared
I attempt to rule white people as slaves.
He recited what factories were doing
for i he. educution of tho children and
said that was tho kind of "oppression"
it soouied thoy wanted to save tho em
ployes from.
Mr. Clayton declared that he was
tired of having "capital" thrown in
their teeth as if it was the only thing
to ho considered. There wore higher
rights. There won personal rights,
and ho could not voto for the amend
ment. Ho was bore to hold the scales
easily and justly. When the factory
owns all tho property they had no
more right to say what that corpora
tion should do with it thun they hud
to dictate to the farmer working a
thousand hands. They should not Im
pose a burden upon a factory that they
would not set on any othor property
owned.
Mr. Hums spoke from tho labor
standpoint as lie saw it, They must do
something, ho said, or capital will rulo
South Curolinn. He spoke of tho lu
boror as a capitalist. Vor, he said, ho
advances tho value of his labor until
thoond of the mouth or pay day.
Mr. Gage thought that this conven
tion should not uttompt to puss on
facts. Thoy wore trying to do it, and
what was tho result V Tho gentleman
from Edgolield declared thut factory
hands wore oppressed ; the gentleman
from Anderson said they were not; the
gentloinan from Spartanhurg statod
that they were. Now, the facts were
that nono of them know what they
wore talking about; ono of them was a
United Statos Senator and none of
I thorn went into a factory moro than
I onco a year,
Tillman?Do yon know anything
ubout it y
Gage?No, 1 do not,
Tillman -Thon why don't you hush ?
Gage?Because you havo not hushed
and I won't hush. These gentlemen
oome hero and try and stultify them
selves by making statements of facts
when they aro not Informed and try to
inako fools of us. Thoy can't do it.
Where, said Mr. Gage, Is to bo vest
ed tho power to say when a town has
grown to bo a faotory town. There
aro factories in many towns. Loavo It
to tho Legislature to arrange this mat
tor as provided in tho committee's re
port. If the gentleman from Kdge
tied will read that report he will seo
that it covers the ground ; ho is a man
of bonse?whatever his faults may bo,
ho has sonso. Let tho legislature
settle it,
Tillman-^That's the sting. It pro
vides for a petition and thoy oan't pe
tition. The Legislature has enough
corporation lawyors in it to blook it.
Mr. Gago?Then abolish tho Legis
lature.
Mr. Gage went on to say that tho
imputation of Mr. Tillman upon the
Y. "? V
ttembertJ of the Legislature wus un
worthy of him. He showed that for
the last five years there has been an
averageiof twenty-live towns chartered
oach year by the Legislature.
Mr. W. B. Wilson could not support
the amendment. Tho towns when
they reached a certain size should be
incorporated and for that purpose he
offered an amendment to section 2
reading as follows : " All towns hav
ing 1,000 inhabitants shall bo incorpor
ated."
Senator Tillman accepted that
amendment.
Mr. Stanyarue Wilson desired to
make his position clear in the matter.
Perhaps tho gemleman who had
spoken about tho froedom of tho fac
tory employees had not seen, as he
had, factory presidents and superin
tendents standing at tho polls handing
out tickets to their employees us they
came up, and if they did not voto them
tho loaders would bo turned off as u
warning. Ono of tho main causes for
tho large profits being made in tho
cotton mills was the oppression of the
factory omnlovees who ntte?lvftrl t.ht*
Least possible compensation.
Mr. Stokes offered an amendment to
make tho towns of ?u? inhabitants
come within tho provision of Mr. Wil
son's amendment. It was declared out
of order, two amendments being pond
ing.
Mr. Ilaynsworth spoko against tho
amendmeut. Tho people should have
local self-government and tho liabili
ties of municipalities should not he
forced upou communities without giv
ing the citizens a voice in the matter.
Tho undue influences oi employees
could be provided against In tho elec
tion laws.
Mr. Coorgo D. Tillman took the
floor and made an impressive speech,
it had been said that the only tiling
moro timid than one million dollars
was two miilion dollars. It takes
money to build cotton factories ; we
have not got it. To get it wo must go
North or to EJurope, Ho regretted the
effort to Incorporate cotton factories.
He was astonished at the position of
the gentleman from Spartanburg, tho
county whoso wealth had been so won
dorfully increased by tboso factories.
In the South we have but two indus
tries, growing cotton and manufactur
ing it. Cotton factories are our means
of converting cheap coltou into cloths
instead of sending it to Now Bogland
and Old England. All cotton mill men
coming South prefer to locate factories
on some waterpower in the country
rather than in the city where any Tom,
Dick and Harry may ho it. a position
to plunder them with taxes- Why
not incorporate two or three adjoining
rice plantations ou the coast, having
1,000 hands! To incorporate these fuc
torlos would be a dead lottor. Cotton
mill men would control the property.
They go into business to make money,
not, to found cities, if operatives are
offensive why should they not ho told
to go. These gentlemen upon the
lloor who employed huuds, he guaran
teed, wished to have the privilege of
telling them to "go" if thoy wore
offensive.
A voice?They do it.
Mr. Tillman?Of course they do.
The speaker then turned to the prop
osition to establish a bureau of labor,
with a labor commissioner What
wouiu that commissioner do, he asked,
except go among operatives and toll
thorn thoy wo'"o not being paid
enough, and invite them to strike.
Up North there were hundreds of
tramp orators who got. ?ood wages just
to go around and stir up strife. Thoso
agitators do nothing hut harm.
Mi* Tillman hoped that the sections
carefully prepared by the committee
would he adopted, lie moved to lay all
tho amendments ou the table. This
motion was withdrawn in order to per
mit further debate.
Mr. B. It. Tillman followed bis
brother. Ho said the legislature
could not be trusted to protect this
class of factory employees. The in
fluence of the lobby with the paid at
torneys on the lloor defeated tho in
corporation of Blich towns. He would
rather capital stay away than come
beve against the liberty of tho citizen.
it was not proposed to overtax the
factory ; their properly would bo pro- j
tocted, but the object of this was that
when South Carolina became ttie Mas
sachusetts of the South, and it was at
tempted to impose upon these employ
ees and drive them out, the employ
ees would have the power put here
I onabling them to (ix municipal govorn
' ir,eut. on thoso towns,
Mr, Henderson renewed Mr. G. I).
Till man's motion to lay on the table
all amendments,
Mr. McGowan was permitted to
speak. This was class legislation of
the rankest sort. It would be inopera
tive according to the arguments of it.-,
friends, because if the mill men control
the bands now, they would control
them th ?0, but a most serious feature
in the measure wits that it would enable
dispensaries to he established in those
towns, and ruination would inevitably
follow.
Mr. W. D. Evans How could they
do it when all the buildings belong to
the franchise V
Mr. MeCuwan?You propose to make
it a corporation, sir.
Mr. Tillman ?By your argument they
would elect the mill president major,
and if he said so vote against the dis
peusary. How about that?
Mr. McCowan?l was using there
your argument. Do you believe it
would ho well to have dispensaries in
those towns?
Mr. Tillman?Answer my question.
Mr. Mc' lowan?i follow your ohm,
and ask one in answer to one.
Mr. Tillman (from his soatj?No.
Mr. Johnstone, in alluding to Senator
Til I man's reference to tho Legislature,
said it was shocking, pitiful, miserable
that such uu estimate of tho Legisla
ture of South Carolina should be held
as had boon expressed on that floor,
if ho had BUOh an opinion of that
oody it OOUld not give him an ollico.
If factories can dobauob the Legisla
ture, let's abolish factories or the Leg
islature. If there exints the power of
debauchery let's cut out the cancer.
Tho factory ollioors hail told him
they did not wish to bo incorporated
beoaUSO they did not wish whiskey put
upon them. The principle of local self
government will he violated by this
amendmont by tho gemloman from
Kdgetlold as much as he claims the
factory presidents violate it.
Mr. Tillman-?Why aro other towns
much smaller incorporated?
Mr. Johnstone -If other towns wish
it they got it. 1-iOok at the expense of
a municipal government: if thoy do not
wish it why thrust it uponthom.
Mr. G. D. Tillman (from his seat) ?
The euro is worse than tho bite.
Mr. Johnstone continuing ?" Kxcept
tho imperious will of the gentleman
from rCdgoflold, there is no ovldonco
that those people wish to lie incorpor
ated."
Mr. Tillman ?lOxcopt that all other
tow in. nave It and excopt that thoy
have not got it.
Mr. Johnstone?Kxcept that tho gen
tleman from Kdgolield admits that they
have never askod for it. Ho cannot
osoape tho predicament in which he
has placed himsolf. Thoro aro 50,O0U
factory people in South Carolina. He
I charges that thoy are controlled by
employers. , If that is so, God help tho
rest. I deny the imputation upon
j them.
Mr. Henderson said he had examined
! all the constitutions of States in this
Union, und was unable to find where
compulsory incorporation was legal.
Tho question was then called, and
Mr. George D. Tillman's motion to lay
all amendments on the table was car
ried by a vote of 93 to 44. as follows :
Yeas?Aldrlch, Asho, Atkinson, Aus
tin, Barker, Barton, Bates, Behre, Bel
linger, Berry, Bowen, Brea/.ealo,
Briee, J. S.; Briee, T. W.: Buist. Byrd,
Clayton, Cooper, DoBay, Dennis, Dent,
Douglass, Doyle, Ellorbo, Evans, W.
D.: Farrow, Field, Fitch, Fraser, Gam
ble, Garris, Gilland, Glenn, J. L; Glonn,
J.; Graham, Gray, Harris. Hay, Hayns
worth, Hemphill, Henderson, D. S.;
Hiera, Howell, Hutson, Jervey, John
stone, George; Jones,?.Wilie ; Koitt,
Kennedy, 10. J.: Kennedy, J. W.: Klugh.
Lee, MoDormotte, McCowan, MeKag
en, MeMakin, McWhito, Matthews.
Meares. Mitchell. Montgomery. VV. J.;
Nathan?. Nicholson. Oliver. Fatten.
i-eaae. frince, Uagsdalo, Road, J. 11.:
Roadfearn, Rogers, Russell, Sheppard,
Sloan. Srualls. Smith, Jeremiah;Smith,
R. F.; Smith, VV. C: Smoak, Sprott.
Staokhouso, Stribling, Sullivan, Taylor.
Tillman, G. D.; Timmormau, Von
Koiuitz, W?lls. Whippor, White, A.
H; Whito, S. E.j WiggB, Wiggins?-03.
Nays?Alexander, Barry, Hobo. Bow
man, Burn, Cantey, Carver, Connor.
Cunuingham, Dudley, Floyd. Gago.
Gary, Gooding, Gunter, Hamel, Har
rison. Hondorson, Win.; Honry, Hod
ges, Housor, Irhy. Johnston, T. E.;
Lownian, McCalla. McCaslan, MeCown.
Montgomery, .i. 1).; Moore, Morrison.
Otts, Parrott. Patterson, Rosborough,
Rowland, Smith. A. J.; Stokes, Talbert,
Tillman, B. R.; Waters, Wharton.
Wilson. Stanyarne : Wilson. W. B.:
Woodward?14.
THE RIGHT OF SUFFRAGE.
Tito Plan Introduced by Senator Till?
mau as Chairman of the SuHVukc
Committee.
Section 1, All elections by the people
shall be by bullot.
Sec. 2. Every qualified elector shall
be eligible to any oDlce to be voted for.
unless disqualified by age. But no per
son shall bold two olliccs of honor or
profit at the same time except Officers
in the militia or notaries public.
Sec. 3. Every male citizen of the
United States, 21 yea'8 of age and up
wards, not laboring under the disabili
ties named in this constitution, and
possessing the qualifications required
by it, shall be a legal elector.
Sec. 4. The qualifications for suffrage
shall he as follows :
a. Residence In the State for two
years, in the county one year, in the
election district, in which the elector
oilers to vote four months, and the
payment of a poll tax six months be
fore any election : Provided, however,
that ministers of tho Gospel in charge
of an organized church shall be en
titled to vote after six mouths resi
dence in the State, if otherwise uuuli
fled.
b. Registration which shall provide
for the enrollment of every elector once
In 10 years.
c. The person applying for registra
tion must be able to read and write any
section of the constitution or must
show that he owns and pays taxes ou
$300 worth of property in this State:
Provided, That at the first registra
tion under this constitution and up to
January I, 1S!)S, all male persons of
voting age who can read a clause in
this constitution or understand and ex
plain it when read to them by the reg
Istration officer shall be entitled to
register and become electors. A sepa
rate record of all illiterate persons
tuus registered, sworn to by the regis
tration officer, shall bfl filed, one copy
with the clerk of court and one in the
office of the secretary of state, on or
before January 1. 1808, and such per
sons shall remain during life qualified
electors, unless disqualified by the pro
visions of section fl of this article. The
certificate of tho clerk of the court or
secretary of suite shall be sufficient
evidence to establish the right of snid
class of citizens to registration and the
franchise.
d. Any person who shall apply for
registration after January I, >1808, if
otherwise qualified, may bo registered:
Provided, 'flint he Can both read and
write any section of thio constitution
or can show that he owns and has paid
taxes during the previous year on prop
erty in this State assessed at &.IUU or
more.
e. Managers of election shall require
Of every elector offering to vote at any
election, before allowing him to vote,
proof of the payment of all taxes, in
cluding poll tax, assessed against him
for the previous year.
f. Registration certificates when lost
shall bo ronowod if the applicant is
qualified under the provisions of this
Constitution, or if he. has been regis
tered as provldod in sub jection l,o.
See. ">. Any person denied registra
tion shall have the right to appeal to
any and all courts of this State to do
ti rinino the question under the limita
tions imposed in this article, and the
general assembly SOall provide by law
for the correction of illegal or fraudu
lent registration and the punishment
ot tin- same.
See. ?'?. Tho following persons are
disc]uuliHod from being registered or
voting :
First. Persons convicted of burglary,
theft, arson, obtaining goods or money
under false pretenses, perjury, forgery,
robbery, bribery, adultery, embezzle
ment, bigamy, or crimes against the
elootion laws: Provided, That the par
don of the governor shall remove such
disqualifications,
Second. Persons who are idiots, in
sane, paupers supported at the public
expense, and persons confined in any
public prison.
Sec. 7. For the purpose of voting no
person shall be deemed to have gained
or lost a residence by reason of Iiis ab
sence while employed in the service of
the. United Slates, nor while engaged
in tho navigation of the waters of this
State, or of the United States, or of the
I) lg II SOUS.
.See. 8. The general assembly shall
provide for the registration of all qual
ified electors, and shall prescribe tho
manner of holding elections and of as
eortuining the results of the same .
Provided, That oaob of the two parties
casting tho highest number of votes
at tho preceding election shall have
representation on the board of man
agers at oaeh precinct, and on the
board of eounty canvassers in oaeh
county.
bee. 9. Tho several counties in the
Stato shall be divided into election dis
tricts, with ono precinct in each of tho
same at which alone tho voter regis
tered for that precinct can cast his
ballot . Provided, That a voter may he
transferred from one election district
to another.
800. 10. Tho general assoinbly shall
provido by law for the holding of party
primary oloctions and punishing fraud
1 at tho same.
1 Seo. 11. Tho registration books shall
1 close at 1 .".ast 30days heforo an election,
1 after which transfers and registration
shall not bo legal, oxoopt as to persons
coming of ago in tin; interim.
Sec. 12. Electors in municipal elec-v
Hons shall possess all the t^tuliticatloj>$
horein prescribed.
Sec. 13. At any special eloction in in
corporated cities and towns of this
State (or tao purpose of bonding the
same or for the raising revenue all
resident owners of property in said
cities and towns of the assessed value
of $200 who are qualified electors under
this constitution shall alone heoutitlod
to vote. At such election the voter
shall produce a receipt for all taxos,
count)', State and municipal, for the
previous your as evidence of his right
to vote.
? Sec. 14. Electors shall in all oases
except treason, felony or a breach of
tho peace be privileged from arrest <m
the days of election during thoir at
tendance at the polls and going to and
reluming therefrom.
Sec. 15. No power, civil or military,
shall at any time interfere to prevent
the free exercise of the right, of suf
frage.
NO MIXED MAHIUAOUS.
Iii,- Con volition Sal Down on Itul)
smalls?The Negroes Pressed the
White Delegates to iho Wall.
The day before reeess was taken,
the convention took up for considera-'
tiou the Sinalls resolution, which
added to the section prohibiting tho
marriage of a white persou with a
negro or a person having one-eighth
negro blood, the provision that auy
white man cohabiting with a nogrb
woman ho disfranchised, that their
olTspriug should be legitimatized and
allowed to inherit property.
Mr. Aldrich moved ty> strike out the
ontire section and Indefinitely post
pone all amendments to it. He .-aid -
that tho convention had already
wasted a great deal of time discussing
qiiestii>ns that had no place .in t he e<
StitUtlon. This, among othcrj^|> ?
matter purely for statutory r<"^rfiUion
Is miscegenation more hcj^Cus than
any other crimeV If you regulate" one
crime in the constitution yh\ not all V
<&here is j.i<j^ioiUlj.e^di^-ni)i; for this
crime to he especially considered now.
Mr. Wigg (colored) agreed that this
matter had no place in the constitu
tion, but it was wrong in the first
place to briny this section in as an
insult to the colored people of the
State, and he was glad that it had
come home to roost to the while peo
ple. He went on to Bay that while
visiting Chicago he had seen a lino
equippuge drive by on the streets w ith
two liveried white nu n on the box.
in it sat a white woman and by her
side a negro as black as the ace of
spades. This did not horrify anybody
and was an every day occurrence in
the North and West. He went on to
say that the sentiment of love was
placed in man by Cod Almighty, and
if a white man married a negro woman
no man dared to put them usuudor.
Mr. .lohnstone said that the real
purpose of the amendment offered by
tho Beaufort doiogat? a was to allow
negroes to marry w hi to women and to
compel this while Convention to grant
their amendment or put them in an
embarrassing position. He for one
was not in favor, positively and em
phatically, of bc'iir: driven into any
such position.
Mr. Smalls denied that any such
thing was over intended, lie was as
much opposed to Intortnurriago as any
man.
Mr. .lohnstone continuing said that
God Almighty novor Intended the
marriage of a white man and an Afri
can, and he moved to lay all amend
ments to the section mi the table.
Tom Miller said that lie was per
fectly willing to koop Ha: races apart
as far as mari'iago relation is con
cerned. Hi' never wantod such a
thing.
Mi-. Johnstono, in order to avoid t! e
possible supposition that ho .was mak
ing an exception, withdro.v hi.- motion
to table so as to allow Senator Tilltnun
to speak, although ho thought tho
subject had boon sullleiontl) discussed.
Mr. B. It. Tilliuan believed that If
an indiscreet act had been committed,
the gentleman from Barn well (Mr.
Aidrloh) was responsible for it in try
ing to obliterate section .'U. The quos
tion was hero; should wo not moot it
like men? Whether the committee
Wils wise m bringing in the section he
would not say. If we pass a law mak
ing it unlawful for intermarriage id
the races, we cannot, in common justice
refuse to punish a white man forth
bauchIng a negro woman. Uo olVoi
this amendment sind substitute, the
amendment to follow section I : "And
the parties to such marriage, upon
conviction, shall be punished as the
general assembly muyvjii'oscribo'.''
" Section ;{?"). Any white person who
shall live and cohabit with a negro or
mulatto, or person who ha . .my
negro blood, shall bo guilty of a mis
demeanor, and shall !>? |, inishod as
tho general assembly may proscribe.''
We dare not, said Mr. 'i i' man. pub
lish it broadcast that after this ques
tion has come up wo uro afraid to act
upon it.
Mi. .lohnstone declared thai his mo
tion was ponding, and Mr. TillmanV
amendment was outol order, it was
so held.
Mr. Sligh, as chairman, held that
all amendments to the committee's
section was out of order : that section
.'H ro for red only to marriages : nil
amendments dcalinu with other than
the marriage state wore 00! portlnont,
Mr. G. I). Tillman agreed with Mr.
Slight That section had boon copied
almost exactly from tho Mississippi
constitution, except that in that con.?
ttltution marriage with porsons of
noro than I hi negro blood was pro
hibited ? Ho COllId, he said, give
reasons for this of a sclontilic charac
ter, hut it would take too Miiiii'.
Mr. Tillman said that tho question
having boon pi'osontcd hero, it should
be acted on. Alluding to the senti
ment at tho North, ho declared that
we knew nothing about It down here.
They looked upon the intcrinarriago
of races as natural, ami he supposed
wo would he forced to shake them up
therein this matter. Public SOOtb
mont was indicated when the last
census for New York State showed
that 1,300 white, women were wives of
negro men. He had seen whito girls
waiters in MassaohUSSOtts kinder orders
of a negro head waitor. lie hod soeo
?a sad sight?a pretty girl, evidently
with gentle blood in hor veins, but
who had become poor, married '<> R
negro, and with two mulatto children
Ho cited tit ;se things to show our
ignorance of Northern sentiment.
Mr. Tillman then movod to lay all
pending amendments on the
This was carried with little opposition
by a viva VOCO vote, the Convention
not seeming to real I/o that thoy thus
disposed of the t'ooper amendment to
Smalls' amendment, which they adopt
ed the night previous after a lengthy
debate by a vote of 10,1 to22, and Which
roads as follows : " And that any
white person who shall live and
cohabit with a negro or mulatto or
person who shall have one-eighth or
more of negro (.blood shall he dis
qualilied from holding any otuOO Of
emolument or trust in this State."
[CONTINUED ON fOUKTH HAOK.J