Joel H. Miller Replies I notice in the Progress of September 27 that Mr. Martin, its editor, copied from The: Sentinel a communication I wrote to the said paper, and then com mented on the same. I am thcnkful to Mr Martin for publishing 'my commun ication and commenting on the same. Mr. Martin thinks when I mention Eas ley, as to what I saw take place there. He then lectures the writer about not knowing his Bible. I must confess to Mr. Martin that I do not know the Bible as I should as he did not give me the book, chapter and verse that he quoted. It seems that he doesn't want me to read that scripture for myself. Any way I went in -search for the city of refuge. concerning the man slayer. Look to Numbers 35:6: Josh. 20:2. I must confess that I failed to find any one that got an order from any judge to flee to the city of refuge. I think Mr. Martin has got his wires crossed on the scripture he quoted, unless he wants to make those that got the order from the judge the man slayer. I did not insin uate such a thing in my communication. I have been very careful in not calling anyone who differed from me man slay ers, murderers, blind-tigers, violators of law, etc. I have always been care ful not to insult anyone who differed from'me in politics or religion. Mr. Martin sars In fact the very plan of csa ti Itself is founded on the prin ciples that in order to escape the conse quences of t . irst appeal to the great Judge K spur names written. "' gardless of all I think the above qif sizes' Q...,Jce to theiprimary rul , - u-to 'be governed by as demo / At did the word judge should be c.(...g'ed to judges. For I understand there were many judges who gave orders to mep who did not comply with the democratic rules. Most all of us democrats thought the rules governing the primary was the door to the polls, so we could vote. We didn't once think that there vas a dag ger laid at the throat or door of the Democratic primary rules. Listen to some more scripture: St. John 10:1; -,"Verily, verily , say unto you, He that entereth not by the door unto the sheep fold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and robber." Now . there can be different constructions placed on this scripture as to who is the robber. Was it the ones that formu lated these rules, or was it the judge that si ned the order so you eguld go through some other door or was it the one who got the order \from the judge or the voter that had received the order? I quote this scripture not condemning anyone, but to know how many doors the Democrats use, when it is necessary to get their man in. This St. John 10:1 is about 1916 years old. The scripture Mr. Martin quotes. to make a point to save the primary rules is about 3366 years old or 1450 B. C. Now as to my brother-in-law being out of the state the first primary. Why should this man be deprived of his vote under an impartial judge? You make the judge a partial man, contrary to what you started out to make him. Why should this man, a good christian whose services reach back to last war between the states, receiv ed a wound in the breast, not in the back, but captured his man after he was shot, helped to redeem the state in 1876 and has always been loyal to the Dem ocratic party, and then not toallowhim a chance at the city of refuge. Itlooks to me as if the judge must have been partial, while others were going thru' this other door to vote. Now in con Cla~ion will say that the people of this state will never stand for anoth pri mary as we have had with the