The Horry herald. (Conway, S.C.) 1886-1923, April 04, 1912, Section of the Horry Herald, Image 9
T!
OSCAR W.
MATCHLESS LEADER C
THE PROGRESS OF
A SANE YOUNG MAP
By Samuel G. Blythe.
(Saturday Evening Post, December 30, 1911.)
It was hot in Washington on Wednesday^ the second of August last?so h<
you could fry an egg on the pavement at Ninth and F if so be your taste r?
to fried egg d la asphalt; and it was even hotter than on that torrid corn<
in the glass-ceilinged chamber of the House of Representatives.
Only a few wilted statesmen were present at noon, and the chaplain languid
besought that they should be purified from all guile and let it go at that,
may have been there was a feeling that some of those statesmen?reposing coa
less and within the zones of influence of the electric fans in the various con
mittee rooms?should have their guile removed too; for no sooner had tl
chaplain concluded his thirty seconds of prayer than the absence of a quoruj
was suggested. The heated statesmen came pouring in from all sorts of place
shoving themselves sulkily into their coats, and answered to their names <
the roll was called. Two hundred and thirty-three of them responded, eac
asking his neighbor: "What's up?"
It wasn't long before they all found out. After Mr. Burke, of South Dakot
had corrected the Record to show he voted in the negative on a certain prop<
sition instead of answering "Present," Oscar W. Underwood, the Democrati
floor-leader, and by the same token the majority floor-leader, was up. Als<
Oscar W. Underwood was cool. Two hundred and thirty-two statesmen wet
moist to the point of saturation and heated to the point of liquescence; bt
Underwood was cool. Not a bead of perspiration gemmed his brow; not a sa
was in his collar and his shirt-bosom preserved its pristine gloss.
i
Underwood Center of a Dramatic Scene.
\ He had a newspaper in his hand; and as he rose the gasping patriots o
both sides took|tootice and shoved up their temperatures a degree or so b
clapping rigorously.
"The gentleman from Alabama is recognized," said the Speaker, leaning foi
ward eagerly as if he knew what was coming.
"Mr. Speaker," began Underwood calmly, evenly, dispassionately and coollywhich
is most important?"Mr. Speaker, I rise to a question of personal privi
lege." The Democrats applauded some more. The Republicans grinned. ]
was no affair of theirs, save as a show.
He asked that the clerk read from the newspaper he held in his hand, an
sent a page-boy scurrying up to the desk with it The clerk read in that sing
song manner in which all reading clerks read. It was a telegraphic dispatc
from Lincoln, Nebraska, and it began: "The recent activity of Representativ
Underwood in defeating the attempt by Champ Clark and others to reduce th
steel and iron schedule has met with the disapproval of W. J. Bryan."
The reading clerk paused here, as if to let the enormity of this sink into th
parboiled perceptions of the perspiring patriots, and began again: "Toda
Bryan authorizes the following statement: The action of Chairman Under
wood in opposing an immed;'"r effort to reduce the iron and stee! schedul
I reveals the real Underwood, ohgeaker Clark and other tariff reformers tne^
W" to secure the passage of a r elocution instructing the Ways and Means Com
There was more of the statement, but that is enough to show its genera
tenor. It charged Uwderwood djvith being tainted with protection and havinj
an individual interest in the iron and steel business, and was a very oointe<
and personal assault on one big Democrat by another. After the clerk hai
finished reading the statement there was a moment of silence. Underwooi
stood looking directly at the Speaker, who still half leaned across the big desl
up under the flag. Then Underwood began speaking slowly, dispassionately
evenly and gravely.
Underwood's High Political Courage.'
"The statements contained in that article are absolutely false!" he~said. In
stantly the entire Democratic side broke into a roar of applause.
"If the reflections that paper contains rested only on myself I should nc
take the time of this House to answer them; but the statements contained i
that article are a reflection on the only body of Democracy that is in contrc
of this Government, and as the representative leader on the floor of this Hous<
of this majority, I should be untrue to my party if I did not rise here an
stamp those utterances with the brand of falsehood!"
Underwood continued. He asserted he had asked the committee to take u
the iron and steel schedule first because he comes from an iron and steel dis
trict, and appealed to his Democratic colleagues on the committee to suppoi
this statement, which they did. He said the committee had deemed it wise
to take up the woolen and the cotton schedules first because the iron and ste(
schedules had been cut in the Wilson, the Dingley and the Payne Bills?an
wool and cotton had not been revised for many years. Mr. Kitchin, of Nort
Carolina, corroborated what Underwood claimed; and Underwood furthe
proved his case, explaining his connection with the iron and steel businesshe
is a stockholder m a company that makes pig iron?and having a telegrai
read from Mr. Bryan, dated April twenty-third, to Ollie James, in which M:
Bryan asked James to convey his congratulations to Underwood.
"Mr. Speaker," said Underwood, "Mr. Bryan did not say I was protectior
izing the Democratic party when I brought in the free-list bill. Not until
differed with him on the woolen schedule did he have one word of criticism s
far a* mv conduct was concerned. * * * I had to write a woolen schedul
that would protect the revenues of this Government, and because I did so an
did not obey the command of the gentleman from Nebraska, Mr. Bryan, h
is endeavoring to make the country believe I am not an honest Democrat i
favor of an honest revenue tariff."
There was some more of the speech, but not much. It was delivered eai
nestly, but without heat and without an attempt at oratorical flourish. Ther
was no frenzy of denial, no protesting of innocence, no beating about the busl
A sane young man made a sane denial?and proved his case. That was a
there was to it?except one thing.
Underwood a Presidential Possibility.
That one thing is this: When Underwood finished that statement and st
down, amid the applause of the House, the State of Alabama had a candidat
for the Democratic nomination for President. Underwood didn't know it; no
was it the fact that he had assailed Mr. Bryan that made him a candidal
Assaults on Mr. Bryan are as common as Mr. Bryan's assaults on other peopl
?and about as effective. What gave the State of Alabama a presidential car
didate was this: Here was a man with the highest type of political courageindependence.
Here was a man who did not attempt to palter with a situatioi
and a delicate one politically, but met it calmly and proved his contentioi
Here was a man who, as floor-leader of the House majority, was endeavorin
to do what seemed best for the Democratic party and the country, and not fo
the benefit of any individual or the theories of any individual; and the countr
applauded and began to ask: "How about this chap Underwood? He seem
to have stuff in him."
Of course the Bryanophobes seized upon the circumstance to laud Under
wood, and equally of course the Bryaniacs would have seized on the circuir
stance to laud him had he praised Bryan. That isn't the point. The persona
equation of it was negligible. The mere fact that Underwood rose to a questio
of personal privilege and denounced Bryan meant nothing in the sober though
of the people; but the independence with which he did it, the calm and con
tincing manner in which he made his proof, the fact that the entire majorit
supported him?coming as it did after an arduous session of Congress, i
which this same Underwood had displayed qualities of leadership and general
ship and saneness that had caused a wakening of interest in him among th
people?pushed that good opinion which had been formative to form, an
naturally put Underwood in the light of being available for the Democrat
nomination for President.
Hence, unless conditions change very materially before the Democrati
National convention is held, Alabama, first on the rollcall, instead of .yieldin
to some other State farther down the list when it is time to place favorite an
favored sons in nomination, will send an orator to the platform in her ow
right and present for the consideration of the delegates the name of Oscar V\
Underwood, of Birmingham, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee i
the Sixty-second Congress and floor-leader of the Democratic majority in th
House.
5 ? J'? T ?? ~ T A/nKloli'nA Pw?AriA*l/?A r\( frTAOf Valll^
unuerwuuu s i^uug L/cgisiauvt vi wtvui, i ?uwv<
A great many men wise in public affairs have held that the Fathers wh
made the Constitution would have builded even better than they did if the
had included in that document a provision that no man is eligible to the presi
dency in this country unless he has served a certain length of time in th
legislative branch of the Government. It was urged for Mr. Taft that he wa
SECTION O
HE HORRY
CONWAY, S. C., THURSDAY, APR]
UIMUt-KWUUL
)F A UNITED DEMOCRAC
extraordinarily well qualified for the presidency because of his long experience
in Governmental matters. Granting that Mr. Taft had long experience in the
executive end of the Government, he was wofully deficient in knowledge of
the legislative end; and this has been apparent all through his term. So with
Mr. Roosevelt. The tragedy of the death of Major McKinley will hold his
I name high among the names of our Presidents; but, considering him critically,
1 no historian at all familiar with the facts can deny he was an expert President,
a capable President, a President who could secure results, a President who
knew how to deal with the Congress which makes the laws he must execute,
because of his long experience and service in the House.
if
I,
^K-: N jl
HON. 0. W UNDERWOOD.
P
J_ Underwood's Varied Public Service.
"t
:r Now, when you talk of a man as a receptive or an aggressive candidate for <
-1 a presidential nomination you tot up his qualifications; and, no matter whether 1
d Underwood's name ever gets before the convention or not, no matter if it re- <
h ceives no votes save those of Alabama, the fact is he is highly qualified so far ;
T as the mechanics of the Government is concerned. He has served in the House ]
~ of Representatives for seventeen years. When he took his seat, in December,
n 1895, he was thirty-three years old. He was placed on the Committees on Public
r* Lands and Expenditures on Public Buildings. In the Fifty-fifth Congress he 1
was promoted to the important Committee on Judiciary, and in the Fifty-sixth
l~ went to Ways and Means. He was on Rules and the Irrigation of Arid
1 Lands in the Fifty-seventh Congress, on Appropriations and Irrigation of
0 Arid Lands in the Fifty-eighth, and in the Fifty-ninth went back to Ways
j and Means, where he has since remained, arriving at the chairmanship in the
present or Sixty-second Congress, when the Democrats gained control of the
ie House.
n In all these years he has been a quiet, systematic, steady worker?not demonstrative,
not flashy, but studious and industrious; and the mere reading of the
~ names of the committees on which he has served will show how wide his
experience has been. He has touched all phases of the legislative side of the
Jj Government and mastered them. So far as the mechanics of this Government
is concerned?the knowledge of how to do the things that must be done?there
is no man in Congress who is the superior of Underwood. And, without laying
myself open to the charge of booming Underwood, the more knowledge of the
mechanics of the Government that is brought to the White House by its four- *
tt year resident the better things will be for the country at large.
c
;r Underwood's Methods Like McKinley's.
Somebody asked me once if I didn't think Underwood is a good deal like
McKinley in many ways. Laying aside whatever criticisms there may be of
McKinley, the fact is as I have said?he was a most expert and effective
President because he knew how to do things. I think the comparison fairly apt.
J' McKinley was a Republican and a protectionist?and Underwood is a Demo^
crat and a believer in tariff for revenue; but the two men had many traits in
* common. McKinley was, and Underwood is, a student of tariff economics.
McKinley got his results by compromise, by conciliation, by smoothing diffis
culties away, by a polite consideration of the claims of others, by being willing
to give and take, by suaveness and civility that masked a real determination?
.. ana so does Underwood. McKinley recognized the vast complexities of the
~ legislative machine and knew how to harmonize difficulties that were pressing;
knew how to straighten out tangles and avoid pitfalls?and so does Underwood.
n McKinley knew when to recede and when to advance, and when to stand
stock-still in a position?and so does Underwood. When McKinley talked of
the tariff, for example, he knew what he was talking about?and so does 1
hut Mr"K"in1f?v tl-pc and TTnrWtvnnH iV tnlerant nf thp nnininns
n of others, and is ultimately concerned in getting what seems best for his party.
[_ I make no comparison here of the men other than a comparison of their
e methods. McKinley was effective?and so is Underwood. These are the
d reasons why.
c
Underwood's Leadership Beset With Tremendous Difficulties.
C
'a Underwood's position when the Sixty-second Congress was called into special
j session by President Taft last April, for the purpose of passing reciprocity
legislation, was a position of tremendous difficulties. He was made chairman
j of the Ways ana Means Committee. He had been second to Champ Clark on
Democratic minoritv of the committee in the Sixtv-first Congress, in which
the House had a Republican majority and passed the Payne-Aldrich tariff law;
and third in the Fifty-ninth Congress, when the House was also Republican
and when he was ranked on the minority side of this committee by Champ
Clark and Bourke Cockran. Cockran was out of Congress when the Democrats
came into control of the House and Clark was made Speaker. Without protest,
o Underwood succeeded to the chairmanship of the committee.
y Underwood was in the House, though not on the Ways and Means Com- '
i- mittee, when the Dingley tariff was made, and he was on the Ways and
e Means Committee when the Payne-Aldrich law was constructed. Though the
s Congress had been called into session for the specific purpose of passing
I
F
HERALD
[L 4, 1912.
) FOR PRES
Y-WORTHY OF A UNITE
Bl Mrs. Underwood.
i
I reciprocity legislation, to which the
i| Democrats were favorable, the House
ill] was Democratic mainly because of the
||l dissatisfaction of the people with the
[' Payne-Aldrich tariff law, the election
that made the House Democratic being
j''i the first opportunity the people had to
I express that dissatisfaction tangibly.
' I The Democrats had a majority of
nearly seventy. They had not had pos"
r? * .
cwowH ui ui?nuu5c ior sixteen years.
twenty-eight Dem^l
anxious^ to revise the tariff in order to
shades of ophuon as to how it should
importance. ^They were eager, avid, enresults.
He knew that the Democratic
party, if it was to have any response
from the people in its demand for the election of a Democratic president in
1912, must show the people it is trustworthy and fit for confidence. He knew
oi the varying opinions as to what should be done with the tariff; knew of
:he enthusiasm and lack of judgment, the partisanship, and even the fanaticism
if cnrnc nf Kic fnllmvorc Iwan. ?? ? ??1 '* 1 *'
wv~.v V. ...j ?wuynvu, ivutw IUCJ( llctu UCCU &U lUlJg UUlblUC Ulcil me
attainment of the inside position might lead to excesses in legislation. He chose
his lieutenants well and went at the job.
His task is not yet completed. The President vetoed the tariff bills that were
formulated in the House under Underwood's direction and intrinsically his,
though changed in many particulars in the Senate and in conference. There
will be more tariff legislation in the House in this session. The President has
demanded it and the Democrats are willing to go at it again in their own
way. What Underwood must do again is to hold his party in line to meet
as complex a situation as he had to meet in the extra session that ended last
summer?and never forget for a minute that there is a presidential election
next year that undoubtedly will be largely decided upon the tariff question.
Judging the future by the past, he will do it. It is a situation charged with
dynamite. Many of his Democratic colleagues are anxious for radical action
in many ways. The Congress will not adjourn until just before the first national
convention is held. The record of the present House will figure largely, not
only as to the individual fortunes of Underwood but also as to the fortunes
of whomsoever shall be nominated by the Democrats for president and that
candidate's success at the polls.
* * * * *
Underwood Opposes Initiative, Referendum and Recall.
He is an advanced conservative in his views of other legislation. For example,
he does not favor the wide extension of the initiative, referendum and recall.
His contention is that these measures have worked out satisfactorily in local
matters where the people clearly understood the issues; but that in larger
matters of national importance the Congress is better able to protect the
interests of the people.
"The people suffer far more from the failure to enforce existing
laws than they do from the lack of proper legislation," he says. "The
people should drive from the places of power and responsibility the
unfaithful servants and elect those who will be faithful to the trust
imposed upon them. The masses of people are far better judges of
men than they are of measures, and are far more likely to select an
honest man than an honest measure."
Underwood's Characteristics.
Underwood was born in Kentucky in 1862, was educated at the Rugby
School in Louisville, and the Universitv of Virginia, and was admitted
to the bar in 1884. He went at once to Birmingham, Alabama, where he has
since practiced law. He was first elected to Congress in 1894 and has been
returned regularly since. He early took a hand in politics and served on State
and district committees before he went to Washington. As I have shown,
his experience in the House has been varied and his advance has been steady.
He is not a showy man, but a studious. He is not an eloquent orator, but
a convincing speaker. His greatest speech was in opposition to the PayneAldrich
bill when that measure was reported to the House of Representatives
by the Republican Ways and Means Committee in 1909. He made several
important speeches in advocacy of his own measures during the extra session
of the House last summer, but none was so important or so exhaustive as
that speech against the Payne bill. He spoke for several hours, took up the
bill section by section and analyzed it from his information and convictions.
This was one of the great speeches of a season of remarkable presentments of
tariff doctrine on both sides of the House.
Underwood does not write his speeches. He says he cannot memorize easily,
and never attempts to make a set speech or a speech where he follows copy
exactly. His method is to collect all the available information bearing on his
subject and arrange it in skeleton form. He sets it out by divisions, subdivisions
and topics. He goes over these, rearranges, classifies, divides and subdivides.
Then he may write portions of the speech, or he may not. At any rate,
urViAn he rrm-iAc +r> tultr he Viae nnthinc before him hut a sheet of naner with his
" **V VVM4VU tv " O ? r-I
topics on it, and he talks without reference to notes or to authorities.
? * * * *
"-IS
5
0
.
'
IDENT
USUfPUKI
? .
PLAIN WORDS ON BIG
QUESTIONS
(Extracts from interview of O*- f
car W. Underwood, reported io I
Staff Correspondence of the
New York World, Editorial
Section, December 3, 1911.)
i
"There has been no attempt M
the part of the manufacturers to
give labor its share of the benefits
derived from the tariff! They [
have kept all the profits."
* * *
"To protect profits is to protect
inefficiency and to strangulate
rather than to develop industry." i
* * *
"I prefer to lower the tariff waff
by taking bricks off the top of the .
wall rather than by dynamiting
the structure at the bottom."
* * * 1
"The people have lost faith m 1
the Republican party because It j
has not kept faith with them/*
* * * |
"If it (the Sherman Act) is I ]
forced as a criminal statute it ie J
an efficient instrument for pre* E j
venting and punishing mopdpafy I
j and restraint of traded I *
? ?
HIS WIFE A REAL HELPrtEBT 1
Mr. Underwood has been helped and
assisted by his wife. She is prood #?
him and has faith in his future. She*
takes the utmost interest in his voA . ,
and his ambitions. She assumes hd) *
control of the domestic establish**?!
and leaves him free from care and concern.
It is rumored that she esc*
lays out his clothes for him and tieshis
cravat. She seeks to aid him in iin
studies and work of research. She
bright, well educated, vivacious and hdl
of life. Not beautiful, but attractive^
wholesome and companionable. Mo
wonder is ^pressed that Mr. Under~
wood's forenfad and face are free lion
wrinkles. All the turbulence znd
Tift UNDERWOOD BOOfl
Uncle Joe Cannon is quoted as saying |
that "Congressman Underwood of Ala*
bama has grown more in public u id- |
mcnt recently than any other man iw the
United States." ^ :*
Other leaders in both big parties ane
now taking notice of this able South- 1
erner, who distinguished himself daring
the extra session of Congress as
Democratic leader in the House,
Commenting upon the Underwood
boom, the Birmingham Age-Hrrmid says:
"The rise of Oscar Underwood io the
marvel of American politics, and wc may
look for its culmination in the week of
June 25 in the good city of Baltimore*
That this distinguished Alabaman is
growing in favor in all sections of the
country is plainly evident on all sidea.
Watch Underwood.?Columbus, Georgia
Ledger, reprinted in the Birminghaaa^
Ala., Age-Herald, January, 1912.
DUTY HIGHER
THAK AliBltlON
Underwood Not Self-Seeking
"My Friends Must Do The WorkT
says Underwood. J
Congressman Oscar W. Underwocflt
when asked if he would be a candidate
for the Presidency, said:
"I think my friends are going, to fay
me the compliment of indorsing me and
that they will present my name to the
convention. I will be very proud to
have their indorsement. No man could
feel otherwise about it.
"But I have told them that what they
do they must do by themselves. I have
a man's work cut out for me does
yonder," waving his hand m the general
direction of Washington, "and I
am going to try my best to do it. I
am not going to neglect it to be a ca?didate
for the Presidency or for anything
else.
"For what my friends do 2 shaft be
grateful. But what is done my friends
will have to do."?New York American>
Oct. 15, 1911. '
UNDERWOOD'S
BOLD PROGRAM
Good Politics and Policv
The Underwood program contemplates
sane reductions, not revolutionary, bat
framed so as to lighten the burden
of the tariff without giving too violent
a shock to important national interests.
This is a sensible program.
It is good political strategy and sound
economics. Moreover, it is practical.
If such a program should be passed
and vetoed by the President, Mr. Taft
and the Republican party will have 3?
face an angry nation with a third betrayal
charged against them.
If Taft should approve it, hit previous
attitude and previous vetoes will
leave all the credit for tariff reforms
to the Democratic party, and will enable
him to recover none of the advantage
he has lost.
The failure of the tariff conmaswMP
has deprived the President of even a
legitimate excuse for further vetoes, and
gives the Democrats ample reason for
going ahead without waiting years Cor
more reports of the same kind.?Near
Orleans Item, reprinted in the Montgomery
(Alabama) Advertiser, Jan. 5. 1912.
J