?(jt &fjm6liran. 8ATURDAY, MAY, 21, 1S70. REVOLUTIONS. The Columbia Phcenix, in a recent issue, gives an article on what it considers indicaa1 *V,a nnminir SlimmAr will he UD- I WVU9 lUUb tuo vvuiiug precedentedly marked by labor disturbances throughout the world. It thinks that " ere long fully one-fourth of the artisan population of Europe will become, not only nonproducing, but possibly arrayed, against the 1 good order and interests of society." It then refers to the gradual organization and con- 1 wiidation of Labor, which, it declares, is < eyery day growing more pressing in exac- < tions and more determinedly hostile. Labor, as suggested by the above, is doubtleas on the march; it is doubtless growing ?more restless, more sinewy and aggressive. ^?|Te aro heartily glad of it; for our glasses do Bfit, in their sweep over the fields ahead, reveal anf of the dismal scenes predicted. The laborer is coming to know more and more of the mighty power he possesses; that is all. That isn't such a tremendously startling ftwt, is it? He has power; has had it these thousands of years; and can one think of any earthly reason why he shouldn't feel it, know it as a verity, and put it forth? There is no such reason save that which class and oaste have builded up?and that they have iwnlried hadlv in the main is very oertain. It only remains to see what wil1 make that power dangerous, and to remove such evil. The power will assuredly be increasingly felt and used; therefore make it & power for good. That is what is meant by the grand $>mmon school systems of various sections of our country. We apprehend that the key to certain of the'propositions of the Phcenix is to be found in the fact that that journal is too much inolined to consider the "societyr" it speaks of as simply the few, the very few " blue-blooded" families of any community. If these aro the only one? it means when it speaks of a the good order and interests of society," then we must protest. The idea of " society " < it getting every day broader than that. It j includes all classes. It means the poor as < well as the rich, the laborer as well as the < idler. The real " order and interests of so- < oiety " embraces all. j Doubtless there will be more or less of dis- i turbance before the laborer has his full ] rights. lie has gained what he has through j disturbance, and quite likely this and that \ man's little plannings may be broken up be- ' fore everything is adjusted. But we advise i hun to keep on disturbing, so long as he runs i tile agitation along the grooves of right and J < rtte&Sm. - ??- ~ -s^r^ ?r~~?rro Many men in discussing these questions j would forget the agitation kept up nearly t oversince Eden by the " first families." And | vre suppose it is not so much to be wondered i at when we remember that the world gene- i rally gives a one-sided snap judgment in \ the matter, calling as it does the agitation of j aristocrats by the nicest of names, such as lf land for himself will be able to work a few days in the most pressing time just when he is most wanted by his neighbor the planter. He will be a prompt, intelligent laborer, earning his high wages far better than the shiftless worker earns his low wages. Then the growing children of this ? 1? ? AW/1 trixrnwlr OlclIJ, iruiut'u LU BICOUJ (UIU ll^viuuu nv>~, will be ready to hire out, and will furnish a :lass of the best employees ever hired in the 'amilies are wanted to set the example of iiligence and thrift, and the pattern of lonest and thorough daily labor. They are iceded to lead the gangs of laborers in the aelds, excite their ambition, and get from :he loiterers an unusual quantity of work m the allotted hours. Besides this, every small proprietor begins j :o enhance the value of the land and to bear ais share of the public burdens, thus lightening the burden of all. his neighbors. His savings increase the general wealth, and aggregate into capital for manufacturing purposes. He is decently connected in the mother country, and can write to his relatives and Iriends ot tno same sianaing in sucitaj, and encourage them to come among us and swell our numbers. When we get one good thrifty family snugly located in any inviting portion of our State, we may be sure that in a few years several families will follow without further effort, and then moro families will follow each of the new-comers, and thus forward indefinitely. But the poorer class of laborers have no such connections or influence. It is clear to us that while we should welcome every one who will come, we should make strenuous efforts, and offer our special inducements to families of thrifty farming people from abroad or from the North. Some of the members of the Convention expressed ideas similar to our own. We are sure that the more they reflect the more thoroughly they will be convinced of the correctness of these views. A NEW TARIFF POLICY. The high tariff men begin to see that which, if 6een from the first, might have saved them not only time and expense but even danger of losing present rates of tariff. Col. Forney, writing for the Philadelphia Press, undoubtedly indicates the present programme when he says : " There is a straight, honest way out of tho peril. Let the Dresent tariff stand with certain practi cal additions to tbe free list, the removal of the tax on tea and coffee, the decrease of the list of incomes taxed, and tbe inorease of the tax on spirits.. That, in a general sense, wonld be at once a relief and a rescue." A bill of this sort can be passed. A bill of the kind, suggested by Mr. Sargent, of California, reducing the import duties ten per cent., and the internal revenue taxes fifteen per cent., pro rata, except on spirits and tobacco, can be passed. We apprehend now that the struggle will come between the two bills herein suggested. Either will, for the present, satisfy tho country. From year to year reductions must be steadily made. Let protectionists comprehend this, and they, doubtless, will be able for years yet to give to so much of tariff as is imposed protective features. THE RE COMPENSATORY PENALTIES. Some o( the English humanitarians are reviewing the discussion of tho proper theory and practice of punishment for crime. They call for a radical reform, and for treatment based on the theory of compensation and reformation. So far as treatment of persons convicted of theft is concerned, they are clearly right. The present mode of action neither restores the property stolen to the man ruT>l>cd nor conveys any lesson to the guilty person. The penal reformers claim that the criminal should be taught that it is cheaper to earn money than to steal it. This can be done bjr the following plan: Put the convicted felo* at work in prison, at a fair price for his dai* ly labor,charge him a fixed moderate price for his plain food and clothing, and whatever else is allowed him. Credit him with the * r t i 11. - balance ot his earnings, luaxe mm aemoi to the cash value of the articles stolen b/ him, and to the cost of his apprehension and trial. When the credits on his account balance, give him a discharge from the prison. He then works till he saves, from his own h*. bor, the exact amount that he got by theft By that time he, doubtless, will have fully learned that it is far cheaper and better to earn money than to steal it, for, during the toil of every day, he knows that he is putting by money, and how much, to replace just what he took. Of course, there is room for commutation, for credits, for good conduct, for merciful amelioration in every reasonable way, but the essence of compensatory punishment still remains the same. The treatment cannot apply in cases of great robbers. But exceptions do not vitiate the general principles. Then, if on the thief any portion of the I ' lIP 1 .1 ? stolen property lgiuuuu, mcuwuci ^uuiauj \ gets it. But if nothing is recaptured, noth-1 ing is restored. Under the system recom-1 mended the State can do more than catch the j rogue. It can, in whole or in part, make the loss of the citizen good. And until this is done, in part at least, we submit that the du- ! ty of the Government, in protection of property, is not fully done. Of course, the State or National Government can reimburse itself from the earnings of the captured criminal. I These two features, compensation and reformation, properly limited, must enter into any good system of criminal jurisprudence. LIGHT OUT OF GREAT DARKNESS. The Kentucky Democrats refused to renominate Golloday for re-election. They ordered the election before the Republicans there had really time to get well organized. Yet, with organization very incomplete, the Republican* vote in cue of the strongest creased from 2,934 to 5,279. The comparison between the vote in the Presidential election and this is instructive. In 1868, Grant (Rep.) received 2,994, Seymour (Dem.) 10,915; in 1870, Lowry (Republican candidate for Congress) received 5,279; Lewis, (Deraocraticcandidate for Congress) received ! ~ ??-? - r? e ?? t GOI ins majority lurocjiuoui *?no <,c*x, the majority for Lewis 4,568. Net Republican pain 3,353. This gratifying result illustrates very clearly what the Chairman of the Republican I State Committee of Kentucky has repeatedly declared, that a large number of white Union men will now act with the Republican party, and indicates that in some of the closer Districts the Republicans certainly will elect members of Congress. The Fifteenth Amendment is working wonders even in besotted Kentucky. M FARLAND AGAIN ON TRIAL. | Mr. Daniel McFarland was indicted by a Xew York grand jury for murder, and afier a protracted trial was convicted, by an ict commodating petit jury, of insanity in tie first degree. The farce has its appropriite climax in the full discharge of a homicUal maniac?so adjudged?who to-day is chickling over the integrity of his spinal colunn, and devoutly thanking God that the fooli on I the jury lists are not all dead. But quick upon the heels of his acquittal ( of murder comes another indictment driwn | by his wife. It is a document made ui of many counts, and by it he will gain anenduring, infamous notoriety. The Xew York Tribune contains a nine column commurica| tion from Mrs. McFarland, (a synopsii of which we print elsewhere) in which she gives a full history of her marital experitnee | and of her relations with the victim of her , husband's bullet, Mr. Richardson, and which I bears upon every line the impress of troth, i In it McFarland is presented to the world in his true character, a willing pensioner npon the hard-earned gains of a faithful, deroted, self-sacrificing, talented wife; an incariation of drunken brutality and jealous pa?sion; and a treacherous serpent who tried to sting the very men anu women who had befriended him when in his sorest need. This indictment will be tried before* jury made up of every man and woman in America. No demurrer will rule it out of eourt? no citation of Greenleaf on Evidence can keep the facts from those who sit in judgment; the billingsgate of counsel will never divert their minds from the real issue; nor can a convenient plea of insanity exculpate him from the results of his wrong doings. The verdict will be one which will stamp the criminal with the brand of Cain, and compared with the load of infamy which 1PUBLICAN. he must carry to his grave, the spasmodic agony of hanging would have been a light , punishment. LET US DRA W THE LINES. The leopard cannot change his spots. Some thing9 in their nature cannot change, i Of such we hold the Democratic party, 1 which, for convenience sake, we will call a party, although so demoralized, so disorganj ize???? t-> _ 3onth Carolina to regard their ambitions suggest ions with any more favor than Democratic South Carolina regarded the wishes of the present Republican majority of the State before and during the war, and down to the adoption of 1 the Fitteenth Amendment. Hence, the Citizens' party omnibus Is not i overloaded with Radical passengers. Indeed, It Is not very apparent, as yet, where they are going to get Republicans to pat on their tickets ?State or local. They seek, yet do not And. Gentlemen do not usually court defeat when by It tney gain neither glory nor grab. Voteless and candidateless, so far as Republicans are concerned, the Citizens' party next get a fire in the rear from the " irreconellables," who rise np from the last ditch of the Cou ederacy, and tell the leaders of the new movement that the " stars and bars" Is the bui ting under which they will die, and that nnder no circumstances will they vote for or affiliate politically with 44 niggers." * ? q11Athpr n?v Henre auempuug m party, my advice to the Democratic editors of this State is, to purchase a work called " Statesmanship lu Six Easy Lessons." A diligent perusal of its pages will save them from very stupid blunders. Respectfully, Impromptu. Mark Time. [From the Knoxville Daily Chronicle.] The above is a military order with which, perhaps, almost all are familiar, and to those who understand it, it furnishes an apt illustration of the position of American Democracy. They have kept up a continual tramp, trump, tramp, for the last ten years, and 1870 finds them marking time in the same old ruts of 1860, with a faithfulness worthy more enterprising leaders. While it has been engaged in tbis useless shuffling of tbe feet, Re; ablicanism has marched forward with tbe elastic step of a volunteer brigade, and triumphed over every opposition. IMPORTANT CASK* United State* Court, in Cfcartoatoa. HO*. C. 8. BRTAH, PBE8I7>I59. May 12.?The cut of Thomas Branch and Fred. R. Scott, of Virginia, and Thomas P. Branch, of. Georgia, copartners as Branch, Sons A Co., vs Reuben Tomlinson, James W.Grace, et a!, of Sonth Carolina?a motion for an injunction to restrain the State from levying taxes upon the Sonth Carolina Railroad Company?was resumed in the United States Circuit Court yesterday. Hon. D. T. Corbin, United States District Attorney, opened the argument in behalf of the defenoa. After citing the various foots contained in the bill, he said the facts stated wore, perhaps, true, bat tha law asserted was subject to controversion; assum' T ?:-i-? ?r 1 A\A mm. lng lOttt lUC acb Ul UJO IM^JOISIUIV VI ivw empt the South Carolina Railroad property from taxation, and that this construction Lad beenaoted upon by the State until 1848,and assuming that the act of 1868 does impose a tax upon said property; was another remedy besides the one sought, and that was the remedy of law, which was full, adequate and complete. It was not the absolutely settled law of .the country, that a Legislature can tie the hands of subsequent Legislatures, so that they cannot tax proper ty within the State limits, and tax all equally and justly alike. He then. showed that there was a remedy prescribed by law for parties who deem themselves illegally taxed, and held that under the recent act of the Legislature the company would have to pay the tax. He held that the system of taxation in this State was precisely like that of the - t United States Qovernment,with this advantage,that the State Auditor, when he thought it neoenai% could convene the State Board Of^ Bqualisation fog the redress of grievances; and the tax-payer, if not then satisfied, could go into the courts to have bin vrmntra ???d. and there was no State in the'Union where appeals and opportunities bj law hare been more carefully provided for the tax-payer who considered himself illegally assessed. He admitted that a majority of the decisions of the Snpremo Conrt of the United States were in favor of one Legislature's tying the hands of succeeding Legislatures in such matters, but the Judges were, in such cases, generally equally divided. He stated that the South Carolina Railroad Company now owned one-tenth or one-twelfth of the eity property, and continually added to it. If the Company could J >ld all this property without paying taxes he would like to be informed hoe the eity debt oould ever be paid. He thought that if one Legislature was to be allowed to tie the hands of all sabsequent Legislatures, seed would be planted to destroy the government itself. Hon. D. H. Chamberlain, Attorney-General, fol- .lowed Mr. Corbin, for the State. He made an sbls argument, reiterating the assertions made by the District-Attorney, and claiming that no set of oos Legislature could be binding upon subsequent Legislatures. He held that the elaim of the South Carolina Railroad Company of peipetual exemp- . tion from payment of taxes, simply because % former Legislature had so decreed, was invalid, and that the law recently enacted was legal and binding. General James Conner followed with a brief address to the Conrt, in which he explained the aitaation of the Company; that in 18&:? a charter and perpetual exemption from taxation was granted them, and that for thirty-five years the State had nJHgroH tt\ that law. Subsequent to the deeisioa ... pr I j ,,. nm, Mlt i?u m the State vs. Hood, the act of 1870 was passed, bat for the provision of that act, the at'empt to levy a tax would have been met with either a writ of injunction, or one of prohibition in the State Conrt, which would have stayed the bauds of the tax collectors until the matter had been jud iciatly^decided. That power was taken from plaintiffs by the act of 1870, and the Company found themselves compelled to pay the tax. It wu therefore that corporator* and citixens of another State, seexing protection of their rights, come into this Court to stsy the hands of the collectors, until the legality of that tax was ascertained and determined. Hon. A. 6. Magrath followed next for the Company. He said that the arguments bad taken a narrow range, consisting mainly of two poiata: First, that there was an adequate remedy in leer, and that this Court should therefore not take jurisdiction, and second, the great question whether the act of 1835 was binding on subsequent Legislatures. On the first point beendearwed to show thai the remedy was inadequate, incomplete and uncertain, and upon the second point be eited from numerous authorities. First, that the charter of a private corporation was a oontract; second, as saoh it woald be protected by the courts under that provision of tbe United Statee-which prohibits any iitatefrofc pawing any law in violation of contracts. His Honor, Judge Bryan, delivered a verbal opinion. He decided that the injunction ask^t for was the apt remedy for tbe question brought before him. His determination, be said, aside from any other consideration, was based upcn the fact that it involved a franchise, and this was the more authoritative, direct and speedy mode of practically determining its exiatence.^enot a speedy one. It was dilatory in its very nature, and somewhat unocrtain, he thought, in Uf final execution. So far as the authority of the State was concerned to do what it had undertaken to do, in this matter, the action of this oourt, and the action from this cCurt, would bring tbe question directly to the ultimate tribunal, where a decision could be found binding on all parties, and the question at issue 'settled. I think, therefore, said his Honor, that the oomrt is more than justified in assuming jurisdiction, and the assumption of that jurisdiction will carry ne ' hardship, no harm to any party here, but settle speedily and distinctly the rights of the corporation and all other corporations identified with them in this question. The injunction will be simply provisional, and the great question in the matter may be fully argned hereafter. The temporary injunction and provision prayed for will be granted. * Return of Mr. Jllleon. Mr. Jillson has returned from the North. Amoag his other business was that of purchasing books for the South Carolina University Library, under iastructions from the' Board of Trustees. The statement of the correspondent of the Charleston JVetos, in regard to the closing of the Howard Sehool, if entirely false. The State has provided the'neoeasary funds. Preparations are b^ing made by the Ideational Bureau for the establishment of another colored school, and a school for white pupils as well.