Cheraw gazette and Pee Dee farmer. [volume] (Cheraw S.C.) 1838-1839, December 05, 1838, Page 12, Image 4
' ssaaasaaaggag
POETRY.
, ... - ^ ! i
SEXTOX, SPARE THAT GRAVE. \ \
j i
vVliil? sojourning, a few years ago. in a j,
r.oat little village in New England, I visited
one evening, tne burial-place of its dead,
which lay near the church, and was filled with
"many a mouldering heap," and the humble
memorials of those who had left the "warm
.precincts oi the cheerful day. A fine Babylonian
willow waved us drooping branches over
an'humble grave, which seemed to have been ,
long tenanted and neglected. The sexton,
with his mattock and spade, was preparing to
excavate a last resting place for one who had
just departed this life, and appoared to be 1
ready to re-open the grave to which I have
alluded, when a gentleman of prepossessing
appearance, and advanced in years, came up ;
to the sexton, and desired him to seek some j
other spot, as the grave he was about to vio- !
late contained the loved remains of his mother i
and *0:1, a neautiful boy, who had died in his J
Fix-h year, about twenty years before. This ;
incident suggested the following lines:
i ensra that nrrarn.
OrAluu i-ywi w ?!*?? ^. w7
Touch not a single clod !
There let the wild grass wave
Forever o'er that sod.
Sexton ! my Mother sleeps
In that neglected 6pot;
The willow o'er it weeps ;
I pray thee touch it not.
"Twas ray lov'd Fathct'shand
That plac'd it near her grave;
Then, sexton, let it stand,
And long in sadness wave.
I
j
Long years have pass'd away,
B. gloom and care oppress'd,
Since ;hat dark, cheerless day
When she was laid to rest.
i
For she who sooth'd my woes,
And lull'd my cares to sleep,
Shall still tu peace repose,
Tho' I am left to weep.
And there my beauteous boy, j
Whose pale and noble brow
Once glow'd with love and joy.
There, too, reposes now.
His dust has mingled long
With hcr's he loved so well,
Whose evening prayer and song
Could each young care dispel.
Sexton, I love the spot,
And that old willow tree;
Your spade shall harm it not,
No, harm'd it must not be.
Nut. Intelligencer.
GROW IN GRACE.
Tnis exhortation is directed to mtn, to
bditoers. It implies, therefore, not only
increase, but such proportionate increase as
is consistent with continuing to be men and
believers For, the increase of grace in
the soul is illustrated by tho healthful and j
proportionate increase of the body. Thus i
Eph. iv. 16' ' From whom t.;e who e
body fitly joined together and compacted by
that which every joist supplieth, according
to the effectual working in the measure ol
every part, maketh increase of the body,
unto the edifying of itself in love." Wneili
er we consider mis passage as rctuim^ tu ,
the increase of grace in the church, as the
mystical body of Chris*, or in the in hvi. >
dual believer, the illustration is equally per- {
tinent. It is drawn from the r< siular,
growth of the human body. An 1 the
growth of a man as a man, is not t. ?c in- ;
crease of one part merely, not the enlarge. '
meat of an arm, a foot, a head, or e ve, of a
tongue, bu the increase of all together in
harmonious proportion. The cnlargcmcut
of one part alone makes a monster, than
which nothing can be more incongruous,
as ud illustration of growth in grace. Tne
same view of growth in grace, is in en >ther
place, illustrated by the erection of a
building.?Thus, Fph. ii 21; 44 In whom
all the building, tiily framed together, growc:th
into a holy temple- in the Lord." This
passage applies to the church, the mystical
body ofChrist, but it is equally applicable to
individual character, A building is erected.
not by the increase or multiplication or
any kind of material, not by a promiscuous
assemblage of posts, beams, pint- s, or
rafters; not by an immense accumulation
of brick and mortar, but by a fily framing
togetfier, of the requissite materials. And
the building groweth unto an holy temple,
not by the increase in quantify of the materials,
but by the fitly framing together.
When therefore, wo hear the exhortation,
grow ix grace, as addressed to arm, to
believers, what is its obvious and important
import ? Does it mean, the increase
of some graces, merely, which go to constitute
the Christian character, or the increase
of them all ? And does it mean the
increa.se> merely, of all, without lesprct to ?
a due proportion, even that fitly framing to ^
gelhtr, which is necessary to the beauty
and strength of all bodies or edifices ?
By understanding this and similar exhor.
tations as applying merely to the increase
of some things which, in their place and;
duo proportion would be Christian graces,
the most fatal consequences to true religion,
must ensue. For example, zeal, in its
place, and i:s due proportion, is a grace,
and to grow in grace, is, in connexion with !
other tilings, to increase in zeul. But take j
zeal by itself, increase its power and activ- j
e i -vl
ity, without any due proportion or numin- j
ty, love, and nieekn jss, and it becomes the |
most wild bitter fanaticism. It produces a j
monster instead of a Christian. So modo !
eration, or charity, increased without a due ;
proportion of decision and firmness, results f
in servility and double_dealing wliich are !
anything but grace. To confine our views j
of Christian character to any one part or
feature, as the object of cultivation and
growth, is to grow out of all shape and
symmetry. It is as though the human
body were to increase only in one of its
members, while the residue remain station
ary. How Would a giant's arm or leg look
<on an infant body 1
And this view i f the subject applies to
practice as well as character. Grow in i
grace, is the exhortation. Grace means J
industry, says one. So without regard toh
anything else, he works himself into a slave
i ;.i * w,i- ;
id j.;.- B bio as ' ailigait in bu^.uss. '?
Uracc me-?ns<'co.ioinv sa\s an ?t.?cr; m<
lie t'ro'.vs ioio a iniser. Grace means lib
t-rnii*v, says another. So no neglects In
i.im iy, and wrongs hfs creditors, to piac
h s name iit^h on the list of donors. Grac
means action, cries another ; so, withou
acknowledging Go.t's supremacy or Ins ow
dependence, he attempts to fly away on th
wings of his own vanity ; and thus, instea<
of growing in grace, professed believer
grow in nothing but deformity. They for
r* Jauo t\r\* mnnn 5inv Oiifi 1m
gtv IIWI UV O I1U IIIVIII! WII , ?...
cfcharactet, or point of practice,'out a cor
stcliation of moral excellencies?a boil
compacted by that which every joint suf
plieth, a bw\d\i\g fitly framed together.
It is also to be observed that the duty <
growing in grace supposes that men spir
tually, us well as naturally, are not born i
full maturity. In accordance with th
view, Paul speaks of babes in Christ, an
of those whom ho had fed with milk an
not with meat, because the latter they wei
not able to bear. CviJentiy, experiment
pie'y, in the time ofChrist and his apostle
was a matter of small beginning and of re<
ular increase through life. So that the e:
hortatiou was then seasonable und oppri
priate, " grow in grace."
It strikes us that the religious expenont
of thes t days, is peculiar in two respects
viz., first, a large proportion of those th
are supposed to be spiritually born, are, i
their own estimation, horn in full maturity
There is no room for them to grow. The
knowledge, their confidence, their cons
quence, their airs, their assumptions, ai
those ot mature age, and even more the
the mature age of former generations. Tl
fathers and mothers in Israel are cast in
rhn shnilp. nrwl suffer a tO'.al CClinSC bv the
superior endowments.
Of course, the exhortations on which v
have been remarking can have no applici
tion to them. Strong meat is their favc r:
aliment, from their fir^t breath, and evt
the " strong meat," of Paul is mere gru
to their digestive powers. They mu
make it still stronger by appendages of hi
i man wisdom.
! Another peculiarity of modern cxpei
J encis, that when it is capable of grown
: essays to grow, tbe increase is all in or
j thing, and consequently we find many di
torted Christians. One has a great nri
c?
j another a great tongue, ulnio the rest oftl
bo Iy is dwarfish, or infantine.
And we may ?d I, what, if we arc n
greatly mistaken, is ; ;o fact, that the ^ i
crease of the church, both collectively at
in Iter individual members, is estimati
more on the principled' accumulation tin
^>1- >"/?" Im. Rut m
Ui llll V I raillll!^ I IV, I L/VH UV/V UlllUiitiiv
be it remember d, is not growth.?A pi
of incohen. nt materials,. ever so great, w
notmke .an edifice; a promiscuous o
semblage of flesh and hones will not mil
a tna.i.?No more can growth in gnu
/ *
consist of enormities or ultruisms. N<
can a curch be built tip, or grow into i
holy temple in the LorJ bv an aceumui
lion of such enot mires and ultraisms.
Northern Watchman.
RESULTS OF UNITARIAN ISM AT HARVARD U
l
IVERSITY.
Professor Henry Ware, Jr. of this Un
yersity has recently preached and publishi
at the request of the member? of tlmDivi
ity School, a Sermon euflled 1 The Perso
ality of the Deity.'
i We believe that this discourse original
in the fact that the German pantheistic
scheme of Fichto has been embraced I
some, who were connected with the Ui
versity if not with the Divinity School. A
cording to the dogmas of that scheme, tl
sum total of all that exists in God, eve
I,r>mntPri il (\t t iprf? i< snv ihll]
UlSJWVsW ???i?i?Mkv.t iai ^ iw, w . - .J
which is immaterial) is a part of the Dcii
ia short the o'd Epicurean creed which i
lowed to the Deity an existence scparr
and distinct from matter, but which at t
same time denied to the Deity any creati
power or moral government over the ui
verse?was quite orthodox when compur
with the system ofFichtc. We ha J hithei
supposed that there was loo much of tli
quality, plain common sence, in our cou
trymen ever to allow them to plunge in
the bottomless deep of German Neolog
but it seems we were mistaken, an I it h
become necessary to prove to them that J
hovah has any personality, or in plain En,
lish, that there is any oilier God, except n
ture or the assemblage of tilings which e
ist.
What an awful warning is furnished i
in such fact, that no amount of talent, i
cultivation of intellect affords the slijdite
^ D ,
guarantee, that any vvno wanuirsirom u
taiih once delivered to the saints, may n
land at last on the dreary coasts of Atheist
where
4 Life dies, death lives, and nature bree^
perverse
All monstrous, all prodigious things V
Gospel Witness.
MORE STILL ABOUT TIIE PRAYER MEETING
The disciple declined going : He heai
the bell. He saw others on iheir way. F.
had no soecial en<?airempnt. Tl WI'O U?f
? -r -? - a o # * i,v?w
some agitation in his mind on the subjec
for the suggestion, that he ought to
wou'd keep knocking at the door of hi
heart. Dut he rebuked it as well as he wi
able, and was not found in the house t
of prayer.
ile had a reason for this neglect. I]
tlioughtifliowent.it was not unlikely 1
should be called on to take a pail in tli
meeting. lie had plunged deeply into th
world, and had not much heart lor prayci
W.th his cold affections, and a mind so dis
rant from God, it would have been a trit
for him to lead the devotions of the assem
bly, and therefore he would not go.
Then he had not a heart for prayer ? No
he did not wish to meet God. Praying i
meeting with God. And it he did not wis
to meet God, would he like to have Got
meet him 1 No, that he would hot. It i
terrible for God to meet him.
But a nrnlingnchnn attitude toward*
<. .ij. c-iUhui i*??ppy. i ins was Adam's I
- sure alter eating Hie lorbiddou fruit. The i
1 ds pie a bo v- named was not happy.?llu
- Hid gone away from verdant fields, and
s bal.ny air, and pure and radiant skies, 10- 1
t ward the gloomy, frozen zone. The pray, j
e er meeting was a kind ot 44 Adam where j
it art thou ?" which told the tale of distance j
n from his Maker.
e We wonder if it was a^lashion among
^ good men of old to decline pra) cr, as many
s now do when they arc called upon. We
- have thought of the good old Jacob, how it
It 1,1 soniu enp htm hpTiTllltr tn lir? r.V !
I WOUiU o? ?*.?? 1? "oo -b - -- j
'* ! cused from prayer; and to hear Jeremiah !
y say, ' pass ineifyou please;" and to find !
0ut that Peter stayed uwny from a prayer j
r! meeting in fear, lest he should ho called;
? j upon to prav. We feel rebuked, however,1
at the attempt to have such fancies about
11 j such good men. Wc feel ashamed to cut!
1 * ! oJt such coats, and at trying to see how |
' iboy would look on those venerable saints, '
j Header, you had better love the prayer j
! meeting. Do not grudge the time. The |
Lord loves cheerful praying as much as he i
s' does cheerful giving. Keep so near Mount!
Zion, that it will be the easiest thing in the i
world, and the most pleasant to go up into j
J* it and commune with God. Never say it I
is enough to prav to God in secret. This j
'c kind of prayer is well; but social prayer
' stands on the same authority. Love them !
al both, and they will help each other* If you :
In feci at any time dull and iedifFerent about the '
pra)er meeting,go for that very reason.;
ir We have known icv hearts niched there ;j
heavy hearts unburihencd there, and thev
rc t * *
that, went in fetters come back as on the
in'*
| wing3 of eagles. Beware of the guilt and
danger of ever saying or thinking,li It is
^ only a prayer mooting Bosl. Recorder. j
From the Christian Intelligencer,
re ? j
3- THR OXFORD TSACTS.^J
Jn j A series of Tracts have within two or
..I ! three years been published in England, en.
| i titled ''Tracts for the times." They are
j i generally known, and refer re J to as "the
~ i Oxford Tracts" as they are written by Pro.lm
\ ftssorsPusey, and Treble of the Urivershy,
Jfr; and Rev. Mr. Newman of Oxford. They
carry high Church claims to the very ex^
; treme point, and aro replete with a spirit,
' j and wil l sentiments which approximate,
|M' i and savour strongly of Popery. They have
'' ] obtained very considerable currency, and
ot have attracted considerable attention, and
elicited discussion in England. That able
1(j and excellent periodical "the Christian Ob'
2(j server which is edited by members of the
Church of England, and which h ts for a
n | long time yielded efficient aid to the cause
; of evangelical religion, has for the last two
mi ^ years devoted much of its space to the exs
l position and reflTutation of the doctrines of
1 these trac's, and of some other works of a
i simi'ar character which hive issued from
o,. i the English Press. It is said that these
m doctrines have been spread to some considerable
extent. These tracts mav well he
l~ ! considered among the "signs of the times."
j They throughout show great kindness, and
; respect for the Church of Rome, and a slight,
; and disregard of the reformation, and its
' " i effects. At the same time they incorporate
I some of the most objectionable doctrines of
" i the Papal Church in corruption of the vital
2d 1 truths of Christianity. The Princeton Bib|
lical Repertory sometime since contained
n* 1 an article on the 4 Oxford Tracts," giving
i an extended view of ihoir principles and
ed | doctrine?. This, however, has reached the
a'j notice oi but very hw of our readers. In
by tl,e nun ber of the Li n Ion Christian Obser11
ver for October, which wc have just receiv.
c- ed, there is a review of a recent valuable
be work ent tied "Essays on the Church with
ry ; observations on existing circumstances and
'? dangers, by a LaymanLarge extracts
'.V* are there made from this volume, giving a
striking view of the spirit, and theology of
the tracis, and of kindred works. We copy
be part of these extracts below. Wc shall next
ve week furnish what will shew the peculiar
ll" theology of these tracts. It will be seen
ed that pref r mce is made to, and quotations
t0 drawu form not merely ihe "Oxford Tracts,"
iat but also several recently published works of
n- similar theo'ogical charac er, and also two
10 periodicals which have espoused their doc.
:>'? trine "the British Critic," and the "British
as Magazine."
"We have termed it 'modified Popery
and it is nothing short of this. But this is
* a grave accusation, and we must establish
it by proof, before we proceed another step.
"Popery, entire and unmitigated, could
j not grow up within the pale of our Estab'
Ished Church. Were a company of Jesuits
j of the most fiery and vehement character, to
e especially let loose unon us. for the Dur
01 1 , * * *
pose of seducing back again into Popery
T)* the Church of England (and no man can
say that such a mission may not bo actually i
ds at work among us.) they would not venture
to counsel, they would not even wish, that
those up jn whose minds they had succeeded
in making a favourable impression,
should at onee avow their conversion, and
. boldly secede from the Church of England
.j Far tnoro subtile and dangerous would be
[e their course of operation ; naini ly to inls
struct their proselytes to remain within the
>t pale of die Church, but while so preserving
0' their rank and influence, ?o teach, inculcate,1
and defend, as large a portion of the tenets j
Rnmp no rnnnlil u*rl? cnfhftr lw? I
3f! Any other plan than this would lead to!
! nothing more than the bare 'toss of a certain !
[c j number of members to the church, counter*
iCj acted by increased vigilance on the part of
ie , those who remained faithful. Such a proe
I cceding, therefore, would be adverse to the
r whole system of Jesuitism, and would certainly
not be the one prescribed by that undermining
body.
l "Or, putting the Jesuits entirely out of
view ; and supposing only a fresh effort of
; Sa an to draw the Church of England back
a again into the hands of Antichrist; what
h would be the most obviously probable course
i which such a temptation would take ??
s Would it not follow in the old track, aud i
bring in Popery now, as it was brought in j <
a of old. by and little? And is ?h?r
tne very course which things are at present
actually taking ?
"Popery in the mass could not be at once
introduced into the bosom of the English |
Church. So violent an invasion would only ,
lead to as violent an ejection. But it is re- |
ally amazing to observe how very large a
proportion of the whole has already been
introduced, an I is now openly defended and
inculcated. Let us take a rapid glance at
the facts.
"1. The name of Protestant, then, let it!
he remarked, is, by the writers to whom !
we are adverting, constantly and vehemently 1
abjured. This is seen in a hundred places,
bo:h in the Tracts for the Times, in the j
British Magazine, and in otl>er writings of
the same schoo'. The English Church is
indeed admitted to he a llelbrmed Church ;
but the more favourite denomination is 'the 1
Anglican Church,' or 'Catholic Church.'
"Such again, is the mischievous error
in which the Church in her formal documents
certainly has no share, that we are
but one among tnany Protestant bodies, and
that the differences between Protestants are
of little consequence ; whereas the English
Church, as such, is not Protestant, only
politically, that is, externally, or by so far
as it has been made an establishment, and
subject to national and foreign influences.
It claims to bo merely Reformed, not Protestant,'
&c. (Tracts for the Times. No.
71, p. 32.)
' 'To hurry men down the steep descent
of ultra-Protestantism to its uniform end ;
the denial of the Lord who bought them.'(Ibid,
No. 77, j>. 30.)
" 'The verv name of Protestantism, cold
#
and negative, and sceptical as it is, ought
to*be abolished among us.' (Quarterly Review,
vol. CI, p. 235.)
"That odious Protestantism/ 'I am
more and more indignant at the Protes'am
doctrine on the subject of the Eucharist,'
'I do believe R?? hates the meagreness
of Protestantism as much as either of us.'
You seem cramped by Protestantism.'
(Fronde's Remains, vol. i. pp. 322, 391,
404, 425....Mr. Froude was a contributor
to the Tracts for the Times, and to the
Lyra Apostolica ; and the author of various
papers in the British Magazine and the
British Critic. His 'Remains' have been
published by his coadjutors, who describe
him as 'devoting himself to the promotion
of one great cause and justify the publi.
cation on the score ot 'the truth and extrerne
importance of the views' therein develnped.)
"2. The Church of Rome is openly de.
clared to be an object of reverence and ol
affection. For instance;?
" '0 Mother Church of Rome, why lias
thy heart
Beat so untruly to thy northern child ?
?(Lyra Apostolica, p. 229.)
" 'To honour the Roman Church and the
| Roman bishops, for example, without counj
tenancingthe errors of Popery, is a perplex.
! ing problem.* (Bruish 0'iiiie, Jan.
I p. 233.)
| 44'But is it then a duty to forget thai
Rome was our mother, through whom wc
were born to Christ?* (Tracts for the
Times. No. 77, p. 33.)
"3. The reformation,every-where bu
in England, is spoken of as a positive evil
i a deep misfortune ! To-wit,
I 44 * The perverse nnti-ecclesiastical spir
it, to which the Reformation on the Conli
nent gave birth.' (British Mag. vol. ix. p
359.)
44 4 Then many a schism evcrlcnped tin
banks ;
Genevcse, Lutheran, Scotch diversities.
?(Ibid. vol. ix. p. 31.)
441 As to the Reformers, I think worse o
them.'?4 Rt ally I hate the Reformatio!
and the Reformers more and more.'?4Th<
Reformation was a limb badly set?it tnus
be broken again in order to be righted.
(Froude's Remain's, vol. i. p 379, 389
433.;
"4. Scotland, at the present clay, is liken,
ed to Samaria, and even to Israel, wher
wholly given up to the worship of Baal
and a hope is express -d, that as Elijah wai
told, when he thought himself the only wor
j shipper of Jehovah, that the Lord had main
I other hidden ones ; so, in Scotland, a secre
| work may be going on, in spite of the appa
rent national ipostacy!
4 4 4Oh rail not at our brethren of the North
Albeit Samaria finds her likeness there
A self-formed priesthood, and the churcl
cast forth
To the chill mountain air.
Whit though their fathers sinned, ard losl
the graco
Which seals tho holy Apostolic line,
Christ's love overflows the bounds his Proph.
ets traco
In his revealed design.
Israel had seers ;?to them the word is nigh ;
Shall not that word run forth, and glad,
ness give,
To many a Shunamitc,?till in his eye
Tho full seven thousand live ?
?(Lyra Apostolica, p- 136.)
"5. Incredible as it may appear, one o!
the greatest disturbers of mankind that the
world ever saw,?Mildebrand, who kept
the Emperor Henry waiting, bnrefoo', three
days in h's court yard, is described as'that
celebrated man, who reigns in the Church
without the vestige of a rival.' (British
Mag. vol. ix. p. 359.) It is supposed, that
to ask that a mind like Hildebrand's should
be given to the Church,' would be too great
a favour; but, on such a supposition, it is
added, 'The first business, then, of our Hil
lebrand, will be to stop this,' ibid. vol. ix.
p. 365.
"6. Tradition is made an essential part
of the rule of faith, for instance ;?
"'We may say,'The Bible and nothing
but the Bible,' hut this is an unthankful reccption
of another gift, equally from God,
such as no true Englishman can tolerate.?
If, on the other hand, wc proceed to take
the sounder view, that the Bible is the re? |
cord of necessary truth, or of matters of
faith and the Church Catholic's tradition is
theinterpre erofi',t hen we a re,' &c, (Tracts
for the Ti nes, No. 71, p. 8.)
"7. The rule of faith is also, in some)
measure, to be found in the decision of a \
General Council.
? ?!f : \ypr?i possible <htC i ?'h'_v> -
Churc'i could, in the nighest and exactesi
sense, meet in a Catholic Council, we should
receive its sentence as Infallible truth. Ir
proportion, then, as a 'general council' rea
iises this idea, we hold its decisions in rever.
ence.' (British Mag. vol. xii. p. 254.)
"8. Monachism and the celibacy of the
clergy are declarct. to bo necessary.
" 'You must have dissent or monachisn:
in a Christian country : so make youi
cnoic<(British Mag. vol. ix. p. 366.)
" 'Great towns will i e er be evangelizec
! merely by the parochial system ; they art
t beyond the sphere of the parish priest bur|
dened as lie is with the endearments anc
: anxieti s of a family. (British Mag. vol
! ix. p. 368.)
| '"It has lately come into my head, tha
f the present stale of things, in England
; makes an opening for reviving the monas
; tic system. Fronde's Remains, vol. i. p
j 322.
"9. Transubstantiation?that vital poin
| upon which Cranmer, Ridley, and Latime
i went to the stake?evidently has no greo
! evil in their eves. Already are they ex
changing the language of the Church o
England for that of the Church of Rome.?
Tiie rubric in our book ofCommon Prayer
; constantly, no fewer than ten times, speaki
| of ulio Lord's Table,' and 'the Tablebut
i with those writers it is always 'the Altar,
i And fotr times docs the same rubric de
! nomina e the elcrr.eu r, after consecration
. *thc br? ad and wine;' whereas these wri
I lers constancy assert them to be 'the bodi
and blood of Christ.'
? " 'I should like to know, why you find
| from saying, that the power of making tin
j body and blood of Christ is vested in til
. successors of the Apostles.' Froade's Re
, mains, vol. i. p. 326.
! '"Can any devout man reckon it a mat
i ler of small moment, whether the ministei
i wi ll whom he communicates, be a ministe
! by apostolical succession or no? In tli
judgment of the Church it makes no le:
< difference than this: whether the bread an
cup which he partakes of, shall be to hii
Christ's body and blood, or no!' Trac
! for the Times, No. 52, p. 7.
" 'I verily believe, that he would no
! gladly consent to see our Communion ?Se
11 vice replaced by a good translation oftl
i Liturgy ofSt. Peter ; a name which I wii
i you to substitute for the obnoxious phrns
. "Muss Book.' " Froude's Remains, vol.
! p. 387.
j "10. The Virgin is to be honoir-'d .
j something more than human ; is raised,
,I fact, to the rank of an intercessor in he*
r 1 ,
f) en.
j "The Christian Knowledge Soccty h
. i latterly erased from one of its publicatior
' i the piirasc, 'The r * f God ?right
> i judging it to be popish. Tbe Uti.idi C'rii
demands its re instatement; observing,
"'As to styling tbe blessed Virgin, 'Tl
Mother of God,' did the Essex minisie
; ever chance to hear of thee- uncil ofEphi
! sus?' British Critic, Jan. 1838, p. 135.
"While Mr. Newman asks,
j '"What must have been her gifs, wl
?; was chosen to bo the only near relative
j the Son of God ?' 'What thiuk you, \vi
' , thosunctity and grace of that human natur
1 of which God formed his sinless Son
i 'How is it possible we should bear to-g;u
'; on the creature's holiness in its fulness
\ Rev. J. H. Newman's Sermons, p. 8.
" | "And the 75th number of the Tracts f
i the Times is composed of selections fro
' | the Romish Breviary, prepared and recon
mended for Proiestant use; in the profai
3 to which the Editor says,
, 414Our adversaries have in this, as
; many ther instances appropriated to ther
f | selvt s a treasure which was ours as nm<
i as theirs. Toe publication then, of the
1 i selections, is, as it were an uct of re-appr
1 j priation.'
\ ! "And among these prayers, thus 're-a
! propriatcd' to Protestant use, we find tl
' following ;
44 'Grant, 0 Lord, we beseech thee, th
" wo thy firvants may ever prosper in j*
1 petual health of body and mind, nod by I
: glorious intercession of the blessed Mai
J Ever Virgin, may be delivered from pre
* ent sadness, and enjoy eternal bliss.' Tra<
' for the Times, No. 75, p. 53,
t ???Hr?l V7 \l nrt7 nnrt nil Ihu cainls Inlnr/in,
"7 *'*" /? ? '? Wit MIX. WUIIMO IUIVIVV
' for us to the Lord, that we may be wortl
ot His help and salvation, who livcth ai
t i reigned), world without end.'
;; l' 'Therefore, 1 beseech thee, Bless*
> j Mary, Ever Virgin, the Blessed Micha
Archangel, the Blessed John Baptist, tl
, , Holy Apostles Peter and Paul, All Saini
and thee, My Father, to pray the Lord o
God for 010.' Tracts lor the Times, N
75, p. 61, 62.
"17. Prayers for the Dead, and praye
. to the Saints, are both advocated. To-w
' 'Prayer for God's depaited servants,since,
knowing them to be in a state of in
perfe< t bliss unt I the insurrection, whenevi
we pi ay for the final coming ol Gods Kin*
bom, we do in fact, if we have any thougl
for the departed, pray at the same for tfc
perfecting of their bliss.' Dr. Pusey's Ai
swer, p. 23.
" 'May their souls rest in peaceP Trac
lor the Times, No. 75, p. 148.
"Blessed Law rence, Martyr of Cm is
intercede tor us.' Tracts lor the Time:
No. 75, p. 119.
' Use thou for us thy gift of prayer
To cleanse thy brethren's sin.
To sweeten earth's infectious air,
And gain us peace within.'
J racts for the 1 imes, ft o. io, p. 12a.
"'Let us keep fast on Wednesdays and Fri
days ; let us keep Vigil on the Sabbath wit]
the blessed Apostle Peter, by whose deedj
of grace \vork:ng together with our prayafs
we may obtain wlmt we seek throughout
Lord Jesus Christ,' &c. Tracts iV ^
Times, No. 75, p. 168.
"12. The power of Absolution and of
Censure, not declaratory, but absolute and
discretionary, are asserted in /rms which
would satisfy tho most impious demands
of Rome. For instance, f
"Behold your armouryZ&word and lightning
shaft, /
Cull'd from the st/es of God 's all-judging
ire, /
ifad in vour wi/oin? inf*. Tb'? word*
/
t Power to your voice absolving, point
i r with fire
, \our awful curse.'?-Lyra Apostol, p.
219.
"13. To the Seven Sacraments they
offer no very decided opposition. Take
, the following for an example;
"The great divines of our Church, since
(| the Reformation, have not thought it incon*
r I sistcnt to hold that to the offices of the
' Cl urch, as such there is allied a sacraraenI;
tal efficacy, and so they make a distinction
4, buween what may be called 'sacraments,'
' { and line proper sacraments, andatthesame
j j time maintain, in the words of the Catechism,
i 'that there are two sacraments only, gener0
' tfvll., Mfl # S\ onltrnflMM D ?" W
; any iidiosui* w oat t uuuu? mjiiu ivxag*
t! vol xii. p. 521.
"Mr. Palmer, in his Treatise on tie
' I Church vol. ii. p. 440. advocates the same
: view. The difference between this belief
an J that of the Church of Rome, is the most
t trivial that can be conceived. The Reman*
ists assert sev?m sacraments ; and this wriw
ter offers to admit two sacraments as 'generally
necessary/ and five offices posse**
j. sing 'sacramental efficacy.'
*' '14. And, lastly, the greatest readiness
is shewn, to res imc all the external forms
[ and ceremonies which our Reformers cast
* away, such as the use of the crucifix, crosi
I sin? holy water chrism, holy oil; dec. The
Oxford poet sings.
< ?\Vhen'er across this smful flesh of mine
?j I draw the holy sign,
; All good thoughts stir within me, &c.'
/ ?Lyra Apost. p. 14.
" 'In saying, then, 'worthy fruits of penh
ance,' the conscience of every one is suita.
b bly addressed, that he may obtain by so
e much the m< re advantage of good works by
> peniicnce, as lie has incuired heavfer loss
by sinning.' Tracts for the Times, No. 75,
- ; p. 177.
r. j " 'It appears to me plain that in all mat,
;r | ters which set m to us indifferent or even
ie | doubtful, we should conform our practices
. i i*. ?i i i
?=> io wose 01 me uuurcn wnicn nas preserveu
id its traditionary practices unbroken.'?
m Fronde's Remains, vol. i. p. 336.]
ts ! " But the reader will be almost ready to
j ask, after this Ion# enumeration of coiociw
j dences with the Romish Church--in what
r-1 it is that these writers differ from the Pa.
pirs; and wherefore they do not at once rash
unite themselves to that communion t It 8
e, righ:t hat these questions should be answeri*
ed and it is but just, also, that they should
be . nswered by themselves, and in thet
as ovn words. Wo therefore quote at onco
in their explanation:?now
v 4 4\Ve cannot join a Church, did we wi-h
it ever so much, whirhdoes not acknovl*
as edge our orders ; refuses us the cup; d-?
is, m..ndsour acquiescence in image worty
s up, and excommunicates us if we do o t
ic receive it and all other decisions of Trid^
tine Council.' British Mag. vol. ix. p,
he 301.
rs "Mere, then, we may ascertain the agree.
e- : ment of these wriu rs with Popery nega?
ivi-lv, as we have a ea iy ascertained it
p >.-ilively. In the above enumeration is
10 included, we may fairly presume, nil the
of | chief grounds of difference between themas
j selves and the Church of Rome. And
e.! u ong these grounds, wc find no mention
? : >.f Transubsiantiat.'on, the Supremacy of
'.e 1 the Pope, Purgatory, ihe merit of works,
? Prayers for separation. May we not say,
then, wiih truth, that four fifths of the antior
Christian system is already acceded to?
m But there remain four points on which an
o* j objection still exists. These are, tliat
c | Rome Moes not acknowledge our orders :*
, she 'refuses us the cupshe demands our
in ! acquiescence in image worship :* she *ren-1
quirts tie unqualified reception of the de.
:h|crets of the Council of Trent* Now,
se | these four points, on a closer examination,
o- shrink down into two. For the first, when
examined, ami unts to little more than this:
p- ?'We cannot return to Rome,She w 11 not
he receive us.' The fact is, that Rome, con.
sidcring the Church of England as in a
at state of schism, will not admit her orders to
*r- be valid. But there can be no doubt, that
he if the whole Church applied for reconciL
*y? | iaiion, this point would be overlooked, and
;s~ | her orders be declared valid by one sweep*
:ts j ^ absolution and indulgence. At present,
! however, Rome signalizes every victory
de over heresy, in the accession of a clerical
hy convert, by a public reception, and re.ordi.
nd nation. This humiliation, the Oxford
writers very natuially say, they cannot sub-d
mil to. But it is obvious at a glance, that
el it is only for Rome to say, * We dispense
ie with this disagreeable ceremonial, and will
ts, receive you as you are ;* and the first of
ur these four difficulties, at least would be
o. wholly remoted.
" Tne last of the four interposes still
rs slighter obstacle : it relates to the reccprion
it, ef trie whole of the decrees of the Cotft^ii
- of Trent. Now this difficulty is hardly
? more than an imaginary one; for the Ro
-r j mish Church itself does not univereany re?
- ! .1 J ??
i' ; coive inosc uecrces.
\>t! ?
! Heak lv simpbicity of MtND,w??The
> doctrines of the gospel are revealed unto
babes. Come, then, with a disposition to
-s be taught. Keally to be made wise unto
salvation. Come to bear with singleness
t of heart, earnestly desiring to know and do
s the will oi G ?d. The word will be profi'a.
blc to the s/mple-minded and the sincere
Christian. As new boin babes desire the
I sincere milk of the work. 1 Pet ti. 2. JSav
i cept ys be converted, and become as little
children, ye cannot enter the kingdom of
hejven. Matt, xvii ; 3. Toe wayfaring
' pan, (and whose whole aim is single and
^/sincere, looking only to arrive at the end
*; of his journey,) though a jool, shall not err
1 therein. Your simple object in hearing
' I should be,to have your errors and mistakes
(; detected, your ignorance removed, your
J sins put away, the will of God discovered
! to vou, all holiness promoted in you, andi
your soul blessed with all spiritual blessings
j in the use of those means which God has
i appointed for conveying them. 0 that we
j may all desire to receive the word with the
: same simplicity that wc desire our daiiv
: meals, and have as earnest and keen nil
j appetite for spiritual food, as a hungry man
' has f"ir the food of 'be body !
Hxkersteth. .
?