University of South Carolina Libraries
tt! AND SOUTH-CAROLINA STATE JOURNAL. mmmmmmmmmm t*iW~M >.'' .(fX' Vv$Rf ' '??'* . ? t; * Y ?! ' ?(.. * - ^TV?*.* ^fa. ?< '.1#T! COLUMBIA, (8. C.) FRIDAY EVENING,.SEPTEMBER7,1827. NO. g&zLvsgK. ? "Y ? ?? . ' I iinw*rg-~Bgg Jeolttmfttx KtUutovr, raurran add aeiuiait Kvnar nuittr avamiio fB* 6W&BUYV SIMS, L |prinitrt t* tht If out* of RtprettnlaCtct of ?n?a ' SHtUfCvUtM. P?IWS?-Thm!* Doimm |>?riura,MMWi or Foor Dollar* p?w?bt? it tha ?? Uwy?|r. IAKMCIITB, AM Inserted At tho rato of ?/-five cant* for every ?w#nty line*, or a ?nmb?r, forth* ft*tl*a*rtioo,au4 forty .?for each coatinnaao*. ?Hut ma mm fbAorlbar* most b* accompanied by the ea?h, ? (?tMiiWANfowM or tbey will reoeire ? MinrtiA. FROM TllS BOSTON ATATK.SM AN*. TO THE HERO OP HEW ORLEANS. Bt jut,and/ear not: let all the end* thou aim**t at be thy country'*, Tky God** and truth'*. ^ Ho ?h a ft that hireling foot cnn Mm, reach tby Roman heart! r^ftfloriovi name? .. Ir deadliest dart, anvjr wield her acorpinn throng, ider a llfthlninjt-foiked tongue, " *1? llama* impart o Hebrew, ah?ll thy feme. ,'PMA through the forftaoa (lame! Tboo, who coold'it -mid annnmber'd woe*? Thy foteblon ?hlrt'd in thy hAnd? A tqHiee-hmn Ihy tvuniry't foe*, ' And epurn ? oe*e command*? Can*? now, ? eenq ueror'i Morn thine aim.' If or lot thy Midler1* glance, that shone Ivor let thy aoldler'* planer., tb To guide thy trtwly bnna - Upon A?eh human vermin fall, To warn them Into lire to era them Into lira to crawl! from that, let Jmla* filch Ihy meed? . Thy country'* hone* " belray:" *TI? bat the alpha of hi* creed. To take a traitor'* pari Hh doom?too suie??hall aoon lm teal'd: flu palace be the M potter'* field," ' To hide fab loathtome thy: ? Hp eannot $teat one laurel leaf That bind* Ihy brow Immortal chief* The dead* thou'at done, he can't undo, Jforyat era** hit own; ffor w(po M CORRUPTION" from hi* brow. TWgraran to the bone!? And vainly may he rant an-l whine. M D?*ny" or '* ef?allenR?r''??? Afcht," or din*.:? Still14 cowtetsaca" hold* Iter throne, And daal*?dlnnai *-~*|>??ch, tVfi"*,? > The won* ttat ja?w? him aarRR Dir.*. ' : l'AOM. Captured at tho V?>r*aw itt!l!?m?nt, Mny 2J>, 17*40, at 18 year* of iige ?fie wra? sabred in the feft K?nd, for refine toc/ta* ihn DHWt?fflcer* boot*. It iaem* he repented of hi* di?r?b?Mli?-nce; for ha knuktd them afterward.', very cheerfully? M New Orlean*! wmmnmem . c ?g? TARIFF MKRTIKU. Ah adjourned meeting of the citizens of Ketttmw District wan hud, in Cumden, ?>n the; 18th Ink*, to reccivc the report of the committee, appointed, to draft a memorial and resolution* to Congress in opposition to the proposed Tariff on Woolens. Col. J. S. Deas, resumed hi* sent, an chairman, and the following, report of the committcu was submitted by Col. H. O. Nixon: MEMORIAL. The memorial of the citizen!* of Ker shaw District, South Carolina, to the honor able the senate and house of representative*, of the United States of America, in Con gress assembled: The citizens of Kershaw district, most solemnly, remontsrate against the passage of the proposed law, eallcd, the Woor.r.w Bii.l. rhey believe, if enactcd, that It would be unconstitutional in it* tendency,' uneqal in its operation, and oppressive in Its effects. They apprehend, that It would provoke contending passions, which might disturb the harmony of t'ie union, and con vulse the operations of the government. They think it would serve to substitute a policy, doubtful, and dangerous In its char aster, for one ret tain, and safe, in its results; und tend to rivet upon tliem a system of restriction?Gothic in its t rigiu?v?d which, through along ttact of time, has fetted tiie commercial spirit of the world. Suc/i a *y? tem, England, now, sincerelv, mourns; and from It, she is, this instant, struggling to he free; And, ?neh a ?v*trw, we are persua ded, if adopted here, would blight our agri culture, fetter our commerce, sap our rev enue, and retard the march of our republic, to power, wealth, ami greatness. The sub ject Is a grave one. ; We feel it deeply. It appeals to us in the various relations ot par ent*, freemen, patriot^ We adopt, with Kin, the monitory tour of remonstrance. It WO mne, firmly, speak our wrongs; ami f*e do so, under the conviction, that they svilM>e heard patiently; vindicated boldly; and redressed nobly, YOht regret extremely, that their manufacturing brethren continue to winee such an undying cupidity. 'I'heir gracing avarice must be checked, or the ge iiius of th?* government will depart. Glance, if yon please, one moment, at the Short his tory. of -ur manufactures. Mark, how, at first, request; mducrd encouragement; en eouragement,importunity; importunity, pro tection; protection. In its turn, a still more oager importunity, until, the system has, at last, almost, degenerated into an odious mo tmpely- I" woollen manufactures were ,?scaE?n (Vity of fi per cent; Ih 1816, "Hid bv a duty of 25 per cent; ?f 33jd per cent; and now, ately, craving fromfjrour which would amount&o a eign fabric* The peti from Ncw-F.ng|und, to the ptised that tne tariff of _ but complained that it at cur rustom-tiousi*,^ fulse oaths: all they prajV od, was to have the full benefit ot that act tnlscould have been effected, by inductor inga bill to alter the act of 1834, ao at, to make the rtfiort of afifirmkero, the role of duty; and thus prevent the future operation of the decision of the fedcal court, that, the Invoke tkall be the rule if duty untem firw edfraudulent. But, Instead ? a bill to pre vent fraud upon the revenue, we were ?ur Srltcd by anew tariff upon woolens, utterly iffcrent In its features, and calonlated to be very different in its effects, from that of 1894. It contained four arbitrary minimum*, rant ing from 40 cents, to 4 dollars, and would have operated, upon coarse imported wool lens, as a tax of from 50 to, 139 per cent. If it be, also, urged that, the tariff of 1824, was countcractad,by England, In the reduc tion of the duty on the Importation of wool, into that country, we reply, let it be met by In like reduction of duty, on the Importation of raw wool into the United States. It is an undisguised contest between rival manufac tures. With them, lie the losses, and the triumphs of the battle. We cannot recog nise, either, justice, or generosity in the act, that, would oppress, ami crash, one branch of honest industry, merely, to relievo an other, from the slight operation of a foreign law. . The bill, in question, would, not only, operate as an inveterate tax upon the south ern cultivator; but would press with invidi ous rigor, upon the poor, throughout the union. But we oppose it, not only upon the score of taxation; but. upon the principle, that it would be introductory of a seheme of policy, which might, ultimately, deprive us of a market for our rnw material. We be lieve that, in proportion as we cease to im port, we will cease export; for reciprocity is the soul of commerce: nnd, in proportion, at we cease to export, our agriculture will de r line; for quantity will, always, be in propor tion to demand; and as demand for our raw material decreases abroad, the less will be the quantity, of the same, raised at home. Besides, we apprehend that, n prohibition of manufactured imports, would provoke reta liation upon our agricultural exports, and this would, inevitably, drive oar cotton* from the principal manufacturing countries of the world. interest would prompt them to trade with those- nations with whom they could effect n mutual exchange of commodities. They are not dependant on us for our cottons, Brazil, with a territory extending 35? of latitude from the equator, with Kgypt, Bengal, Ava, aud other fertile climes could soon he put i Into such a state of cultivation, as to enable them to simply the world with this article. Wr. have,therefore, just reason todrciul that cumbrous system, which the most enligh tened nations, are hurling off, in order to make commerce as bounteous as the ocean, and, as free, a* its winds. Hut we are told, by way of consolation, that, the north will, shortly, afford a market for our raw material. This yields not a ray to ehccrus:it is a promise Which will be " broken to the hope " Wc know that the manufactures of the world consume more than 1,000,000 of bales; that wc now grow, at least, 900,000; and that, of the number, here crown, not more, than 150,000, arc con sumed by northern manufactures, while the remainder, are exported to Kngland, France, Germane, nnd other manufacturing coun tries. With all the protection of govern mcnt, we are persuaded, that northern man ufactures, will not, for a long time to come, if ever, consume more than 300,000 bales. The assertion is predicated, partly, upon the fact, that, the aggregate population of this country, do not copsumc 50,000 bales; and, partly, upon the principle, that, our manu factures cannot come in competition, on equal terms, in foreign markets, with the manufactures of the old world. True, we have told a few coarse cottons in the Mexi can, and Houth American markets; ami this iw muncea me wun vision mat, our mHnu> facturescnn compctc with All Alia,?all Eu rope. Hut England can, and will, deprive m, even, of those limited murket*, on our own continent. The trade is now, conduc-j ted, chiefly, in British vessels; and it will, owl), Ik* requisite for her to reduce the pre sent doty on South American import*, to induce a reciprocal reduction on English mitiiufacturcd export*; and, with this advan tage, she Mfouhl drive our fabrics from those markets, to seek a more friendly port, or to rot a* a drug. ' i. < I Rut, without going into an argument to *how the immense advantages enjoyed over us, by other manufacturing countries, in re tard to capital, machinery, and the price of Isittor, wr, will, merely, state a stubborn fact, which cannot ho conquered by fair ar gument: it is this: If, as in universally con ceded, we cannot compctc with the mami-1 factnrcs of, certain, other countries in our own market, after they import the raw mat eria} from u*i export it, manufactured, to u*< pay heavy excise duties uptn it at home; and tonnage, and other duties hcrci We repeat, if we cannot, with all these advan tages, under sell them In our own market, without levying an additional duty of 35, 50, 75 and 100 per cent, upon their commodities, i? it not proof conclusive, that we cannot cope with them, on terms of equality, in for eign markets* And, if it be true, that w? ran no' copc with them nbrond, is it not, equally, clear, that the datiK<*rous system trc are about to foster, will, if encouraged, ultlmatelv, react upon the nation, so at" to embarrass her progress; impoverish her people; impair 1 er energies; ind. In short, KMduce a withering effect, upon the interest. , now, protcvtfcand upon every nerve ofna lienal Industry, m ,, Your mcmoriu'i t?, al?o, invite ymiri ous attention ??the present dej of imtthcrn agriculture: it'istr - and thejf regret ?>i?uy. that this deprossiqp, in a lifnto legislation of tbn ge Taxation has, quickly, followed taxation In the nature of an Inskllous tariff on kbpost* which ha* operated to lesson the nett in come of the southern cultivator. At one time, assuming the shape of n simple tax upon cordage and baggiug, it fritters awagr more than $280,000, of his profits: at anoth er, boldly, taking the character of an oner ous duty upon cottons, woollens and other imports, it sweeps away his profits to the amount of millions. Within a fow years past, agricultural capital has declined, at least 40 per cent, in Kershaw districti and we are a favoured section, compared with the low country of the state. This sudden de clension has induced a general embarrkse ment, which must end in bankruptcy, If far ther oppressed by goverusient. The plan ter, does not realise, upon his capital, thus depressed, more than 4 per cent, In conse quence of the redaction in the price of the raw material. Without relief, we fear, that it will he necessary for our labor to seek new channels; and for our (tapHal to find oth or investments. At this moment, we are, seriously, discussing the practicability, and policy, of ndopting a rigid system of do mestic economy, by cutting off all unnoeessa supplies, and making and raising, what we can, for use and consumption, at home. And it may, shortly be, also, necessary for us ip ascertain, whether, wo have not as abtftirtiflr streams for machinery, and as healthful situations for work shops; as fertile pastures for sheep, and as congenial a climate to breed them, as the northern manufacturer: and, whether, if the northern people will not re ciprocate with us, as brothers, we inayiot, fearfully grapple with them asrivals. This, we confess, would be at last, expiring alter native, for we should say, that the vigo rous, manly, healthful pursuit of husbandry, with the mental independence it inspires, has more charms for us, by for, than the gloomy walla of pestilential wnrk shops; and the meagre mindless, dependant spectres which inhabit them. We sincerely trust, then, that self interest, if not principle, will prompt the citisens of the north to pause-, Uv fore they good us into desperation. For though, we would not violate the constitution of our country, for purposes of emolument; or of retalitioii, or f?>r any thing earthly; still, we are resolved, to adopt every consti tutional menus, which ingenuity can devise, to evade, or resist, thwart, or it possible, crush any law, or laws, looking to a policy, so unfeeling, unnatural, injust and unconsti tutional, as that with which we arc threaten ed: and if, after all our expostulations, do mestic schemes, self denials, sacrifices, and moral resistance, we find, that we carowg breathe under th? odious system impuwi,* we must make an effort to heave it off, what ever may be the shock of the republic. For God knows, we would, infinitely, rather die like martvi-s, than live and pnv tribute like slave*, tfut wc will not despair of your jus tice nnd magnanimityi we indulge the ra tional hope, that after hearing our complaints, and weighing our cause, your " hearts will, leap kindly tonature," and that you will indig nantly frown on any proposition to oppress us, your brethren hy birth, and by political ad 3>tion. And we feel our present depressed tuatlon, the more iceenly, from the fact, that northern manufacturers, crave additional duties, at our cxpcnce, with a full knowledge of the oppression under which we groan; and this too, at a time, when they enjoy from 10 to 30 per ccnt upon thelrcapital. If cor rectly informed, there are manufactures, in New England, which realise at least S3 per cent, and manufacturing capital, of a certain kind, is said to be from 30 to 40 percent, be yond par. Agricultural and mercantile funds, nave recently been invested in manufactur ing stock, at from 30 to 40 per cent, beyond par. These facts, together, with the sud den increase of the capital of woollen manu factures, from 10 millions to 40 millions of dollars; and also, the rapid investment of nc;?riy 40 miliums in those of cotton, since the tariff" of 1824, go to prove* that manufac turing stock, enjoy* a premium, which; un der the existing circumstance* of tUo coun try, ought, at least, to silence the importu htty of ? dcath-lihe avarice. It, consulting, also, the amount of duties on i?nl?ortations, it will be found, that the protection afforded, by government, to commerce, navigation, and agriculture, united, is net more than half as great, as that extended to manufactures atone. The fact cannot he disguised, that manufacture* in this country, enjoy more Jtrotection from government, and contribute esa to its support, than in any other on earth. In Crept, Britain, tho three great articles of cottons, woollens and hardware, amounting, at tea**, to f ASQ>000,()00, inclnd ing home consumption, receive no protection from custom duties while we imprae a tax of tr*vrj\ 25 to 100 p? r rent, upon the two former commodities. This ought to be the last country on earth, t.-> oppress its agriculture. It should, rather, be protected an the moat certrln, and bountiful source of national sup port. Even (ireat Brit a in, complied as the U, totheereanf afew thousand square rtiles, derive* her national wealth, chiefly, front agriculture. The annual amonul of'proper ty created in KngUml and Ireland, ma/ be now ertamated at about, 4:440,000,000 ster ling! Agriculture, in mII its departments, produces at least, ?220,000,000. Manufac ture*, In all it* branches, (exclusive of pas turage, which, properly belongs to agrii-al ture,) produces about ?125,000,000. The number of persons engaged in agriculture, ere nearly Ave mill ions. The number em gaged Wifnanufactures, mechanical, and oth m- trade*) exceed seven millions. Thus, It appear* that Great Britain, (including Ire la?Ki,> which, from local circumstances, can riaon with us* bo denominated nation, derives nt least, fktore, of national tbatt front mauufac whvntheie are.mil In agriculture, than In ?njr other occupations: mark the rela tive qj?ntity of labor eogaged In thi.te de partmenta of industry respectively, and cal culate the profits of each* and wlU find, an almost* incredible difffcnnce In favor of agri culture. It la not to be presumed, then. If agriculture conduces so much more than manu&ctures to the national weath of Eng land, that the latter have resulted from a surplus of commercial and agricultural popu lation? If then England derives such a grant proportion of her wealth from agriculture, confined as she Is, to a small extent of coun try, and limited as she la, in the variety o! her stablest what should he the policy of the United Stales, with agricultural means as unlimited as her territory, which stretch es from the Oulf of Mexico, fur towards the Arctic) and expands toward* the rising and the the setting sun, until it meeu the eastern and western oceans? Your memorialists also believe, that, the proposed tariff would infiiet an iiriury upon the commerce and navigation of the United States. In 1825 our Imports amounted to f96,34l,075,of which 191,903,513, were im ported in American vessels; our exports the same year amounted to #99435*388, of which at least, f69,00u,000, were exported in Ame rican tonnage. More than 880/XX) tons of American .shipping entered, and 9MJ0Q0 cleared the ports ofthc United States; while of foreign shipping, about 93.000 tons en tered, and 95,000 cleared our ports. The pnst year our import* were 11,365.598, less, and <*ir exports 31,940,06*, less, than those of 1835. Well, if an increased tariff should, greatly decrease our exports, and even, not effect our imports, it is rational to presume, that the latter wouldbe^ransported In foreign vessel*, which in not now tnc case; but (to take the more eloomv, but correct view of the plcturc.) if our *im|>orts and exports should both, vastly decrease; and prohibition i provoke retaliation; and these drive foreign commerce from our shore; our naval marine would fade from the ocean, and the plough share of ruin pats over the land. Your memorialist* also apprehend, that, the proposed bill, would decrease the reve nue. 'I his ia manifest, from Its real nature, and object. What is.it* r*ul object? To prbhlbtt'ce^tain ini|?ort'*. It *o; and if reve nue (trained, principally, by duties on imports, it follow*, as a necessary consequence, that ns imports decrease, revenue must decline. Again: it will not tie contested by those the least, conver?"?t with our commercial histo ry, that, the quantity of our imports has, al wayn l?oroe a cernin ratio, with the quantity of our export*. In proportion, then, a* we iftphance tnc'duty on importation, we will raise the price of the imported article; and as we rsifce the price on the imported article, we will reduce *he quantity thereof, by re ducing the mean* of procuring it. For, it would be madness to imagine, tliat we could purchase with the same amount, an equal quantity, of the same commodity, taxed, 35, 50, 75 and-.100 per cent, a* if a less tax were imposed. And a* quantity dccreaw*, reve nue must decline* and a* revenue declines, the land tax will rl?? ; for it would be in vain to attempt to ral*c revenue, to any extent, in thin country, by excise duties. If such would t'c the effect, upon the revenue, the only alternative would be, to re*ort to direct taxation. Tills the republican spirit of the American people would not brook. A pen, dipt in gall, could not indite term*, bitter enough, todc.scrlbc our antipathy of a poli cy, which would warm into being, swarms of tax gatherers and excisemen, to prey like harpies upon our property, and to profane our very family altar*, by prying into our household effects. Your memorialists, will conclude, by sim ply protesting against the constitutionality of the bill. They decline a discussion of this point. They have not the vanity to presume, that they eouhl nfford vr.u a static ififnm of light upon it. They merely glance ut it as one of the strong grounds of remonstancc. They will only say, thnt the power to "lay Mid collect duties, ' wns granted to Congress for a specific purpose?revenue?this cannot be denied by the friends of the bill. If so, we ask why does the bill, or. its face, purport to be for revenue alone, when it is really in tended to destroy it, by prohibiting certain imports* Because, say its advocates, if thus enacted, it would be pronounced unconstitu tional by the federal judiciary. If then, an object would be unconstitutional, if express ed by a law, it follows, that it would also, be unconstitutional, if implied by a law. A law constitutional in its features, but calculated and intended to be unconstitutional in its cf fee**, is as gross n violation of the constitution, as if the purpose, to lie effected, had been ex pressed. Hence It results, that the propos ed bill purports to be for a constitutional object, but ts insidiously Intended for one not constitutional, it is a violation of the spirit of the constitution. These views are confirm ed by the 216th page of the journal of the federal convention, where it will be seen, that, a proposition was distinctly made, to give Congress the power to "establish reward* and immunities for the promotion of manu factures," and not adopted. These are some of the reasons, which hr? ve influenced this remonstrant <?. We trust, they will not lie in vain. They appeal t<> your justice, your liberality, vour patriotism, your honor. Tlicy ar* made l>y citizen* of the s*me?repubHe, and by descendants of the same hires. Thev flow from bosoms which throb with patriotic devotion, for the govern ment, and for the union. And he it not for Cten, that they come from men, who pro i to be, intimately acquainted with their rights, who have * ken sense of injustice, and who foster an Immortal horror of op pression. Wcforbext to indulge our feelings. Could they speak?-they would utter " that Imrn." A* American patriot*, we wi bury them in ia?r hearts) and oddr* sa yo?t 1 the Mild/ 'Hit firm tone, ot resp'Vtfhl ?tr*Ve. Th*r+t'++r r I 1st Ffotvrd. That we see In the aed. woollens bill, and the mm to force lt? passsmu the act el flower, agalnit JmKer end the 9d. Revived, That it should be i by ell conmtuifaneU meant, both in I ?*ge, and Us injurious operation pit that, for that purpose, a committee c persons be a|>i>ointcd, whose duty it i to correspond with other districts of t* generally and, that their atte drawn to the following objects?1? certain and communicate through t um of the publio prints all such modes of I vestiture ot capital,aa may direct enterprise, into other channels; ana 9nly, how for it would be to our advantage, to mi&e at hoquw,** ail the articles used by us, and In our occ** 3d. Rmotved, That the only "true Awe*. .>? rican system,*' is that which leave* to indos* try and enterprise Msown reward,. UMhackr led by restrainu of any kind; that wqlcfc en* courages a liberal tatercourpe wi&Hl, and gives a preference to none. 4th. Jientved, That copies of the abovw memorial and resolutions, be forthwith trans? > . mitted tothe Governors of the several states* to our Senators and Representatives, to be laid before Congress; and to the other die- . * triets of this stent A short and animated discussion arose eft $ the constitutionality of the proposed law} but the question was almost, unanimously* v decided in favor of the report of the com* ? > mittee. . The following genet! em en were appoint* ,J ed a committee to carry into effect the ab?M jects embraced in the 2d resolution. vlst.G H. G. Nixon, W. W. Lang, Esq. ?nd ~ J. S. 1)chs, ? V "as added, on motion. I meeting then M/JUrned *hte die. JAMK8S. DEAS, Chairman. jfy T. P. F.vans, Secretary. -?+ "Vt The Buchanan letter operates more vio lently upon the Clay and Adam* men than 1 they originally imagined. Mow the excite ment Uover, it it as palpable asthe light of the day, and from Mr. Buchanan'* khewing, thut Markley, the agent of Clay* * did make the proposition to Gen. hcklW, through Mr. Buchanan. The whole opera- . ?? tion was one of Clay'* fine?ra to ?et the odf 1 trick, but he lost it, fend all the honors Wf *. boot.?*JY. 1*. Enq. - RIDDLES. You have it and / have it not, yet. J use 11 oftencr than you do; what is it* Inhere 1* a word in the En^bh of one unliable, and if you take away the two " first letters, it becomes a word of two tyllo- 1 ^ J'rom the N. Y. Commercial jfdvertiter. Tlip lnwyem are to hold n meeting tbls after* no?.n Biihifcltv h?*ll. fu object.wearetoltl,WM? * .?on,nli ntion iin' in-1 iiio<!m of anorteolng the da rn! Ion of Imv miiH, whirli are becoming write to* rA; "} Ion* winded even fur tl?#? gentlemen of the loud , rol?e themtnlvet. This evil lint at length, kmrtv* i Wi Mtihwd a magnitude ?oft)rmSdsbl?t that even ?he iudge* Ihumwlvrs we hrllmw, admit, and are detirom, that vometliinir nhonld be done. At this - 4? Is?t circuit held in (hit rily, owing to the |We? of ?" . ^ criminal limine**, notone ease, out of a calender of 3W7, wm Irird; and at the prwrlou* circuit, Ibt proportion ua? only m '2.1 to 809! What a cheer* ing piwpeet to suitors. Qurre?whether a law, or tytletn of law, doe* not ?? impair the obllgatls* ?d contract*," when H affords no meant of enfore- 7 Int their nerfotniance, without the mott ruinous ,T delay una evwnso?n delsjrandespouse nmouet in?, in * denial of justice. We should like contlitntlonat jurist to solve this qaeMlon Wr a?< a Final Notice. THE mliwrihfr wishes to Inform all thoss indebted to him he nota or open sfirount that wm due on the M of Jannary 1W7, that they 1* OTii?t rome forward find tattle before the 1st day of Octolier, or they will tad them In 1 ha hand* of an attorney for collection without miprct to perton or hatitrt: also, all those In debt to ma a**itned by D. L. Wakely, If they ate net nettled hy the lime aforeaald, they Will aertalniy And tlinm In the hand* of attorabsof dMbreflt % district*. JOHN BL AdKl;g m August 31 ? 86 H To Rent THREE SI HIES in the Brick Hang*, also, tbe u|>|wr |>art 01 the house. The part that R. A, Tiiylor rircupi*** ha* Ave room*; the pert the set- f <?. *cribsr oeeaples ha* nlaa rooms. ? ai m>? . ! The House and Store occupied lately by Louis Levin. ?" HI*"' .V ? - * ' ;i,lR A Hon** nn?t l.ot occupied st present by Or. John Myers, thia house Is neatly Anlsbed with all necensty ont buildings. f. Po**e**ion can be given on the lit ot Oelob.t. The *nhwr|her hst aeveral other houses that will bw let at the Mine time?for further pmtlealars ttfb nly to JOHNlUlACfi^tPi Augo?" 511 i" * ? ? ?1 , For Sale or Kent. Col. Canton's two I Srge Brlek Ateraf, jfo ?tl|tP wWh eotnmoilbma duelling apart in rait Weaeh, at the corner ot lliellsfdioa ati ' street*. Applv to J I November 2< ' '.^AkiSti ? |Ltw Notice, yh THftKMhserlhers have entered into eonayteer ?h?p In |l>e (rtariire <>f L^W and Efl^ITt rommeaded by Spplylng I