Historical Newspapers of South Carolina

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

tl?e law, WUU all \#e own, a* the ?UtUHnce In tiki inniii . A Mr. Mumt every, ! * Brjti*b Judge Dwchta has been charad in ? pnb irual.whh having com (pitted various to bmwjM He . j ,,;.-,. - __ ... _ sen dalous, .And mufktous libel,** but ofers no sfsafsffis^at s&sc pmccuttvt counsel, distinctly acknowledges that. In the conduct of tho defendant tbeie waii nothlnfT^'/Ma/ifioM*." The learned J*dp> however, consider hot the law op. pdcable to the caae requires a verdict of '< (Mtv.THMI the Jury find accoHliony, - ? Tm aartmeiM ??xht Integrity o? tho learned judge, are abote att'Wspkkip, but the wisest and the beat of men may some-, times err In judgment, bud wo confesy that, ?in a ease like that to which ws'allsde, we ftrel any thing but a disposition toqaarrei "w'th that principle of Britibh jurisprudence, which makes the jurors judges of the law; Us V'*t!l kit <Aftfce fact. ? a ? W? willnotdwell on Mr.Bochsa'scase, but vrr will suppose another. Let its imagine, f ?? a moment, that the principal actors in Wist the French pleasantly can ("the affair des," had escaped justicc and by the w tat tl ?<i Fual inscrutable decrees of providence, ..which eitoapc the asm coun vjmvricses permits wretches to ^sdlows.or the guillotine of thvit try, thut they may invest this~-|?t us sup p-s? that these miscreant*, i<fier cooly butchering their victim, and bringing a hog v? lap upJJic warm blood of the dying man, litd come over to England to superintend an institution., established for the advancement of public morula, and that some paper had mentioned the uttrociflc* ?f which they tvero convicted, would any Englishman have thought It wrong to prevent crime and infa my tram being raised to the level of integri ty ami honour? Tltuttiulh may be a libel, ai?d ought to l>c |)imhthc?l In certain vuici, an for instance, wlun a youthtul indiscretion is mali . ciously brought forward to injure ti chuiao t?'rflhr>*n which year* of hout urable conduct hnve wnshcdawuy Its early stains we admit, but wc cannot concede* the tame indulgence to recent depravity, and especially when It aspitcsto public honour*, and claim* public <*>nftdcncc. To us it appears that if in such a ease *i? lenre and respect were demanded from tlie press Ha utility will be greatly abridged, juiiI iu boosted liberty rcduccd to au empty iMune. Could that which we have supposed occur, th -question, how ought a juror to act.1 be comik one of va*t importance. hltould.be be told, that tlie law required a jwiiict of gv.ity? ought he not to ask hintKcIf, " guilty of what?" l*ha crimc to say ot a convictcd murdeior, that he Is a- bud man.' Can a iuri i"H ror, who shudders at the hartfidca of "lav perjury upon hi* soul," acting under tne mn obligation of an oath, impute guilt to fellow subject for exprcs&ing an opinion, soTcmn obligation of an oath, impute guilt to tvltich, he will not scruple to avow, i* -his own, the moment he leaves the jury box? IJ jr milmIi may be very angularly constitu ted, but, for ourselves wc hesitate not to *.*}, that we could not, on nutl., declare I It-it guilt attached ton man against whose integ rity nothing had been established, because he hud 'ihputed crime where It could not be dis proved. ami had wit even been denied. Mi reel nf thefirirlih Ministry is noon to offer to Parlwim.'St n reformed Law of Alltel. Mr. Urtrujhant lately mid, in tho House of " It would hardly be believed. that there were records In the court of king's bench, by which H might happen that a man, convicted of fclony? could maintain an action for libel ugaiosfc ? party publishing his conviction. This might happen, as it had to himaelf on a l.iic occasion, when the defendant had actu 4ly mhispjck^miMlhentic itcdcopyof the It cord of the felon's conviction. In an in d foment, however, thia could not be pfrodu ? ed m c v idcnce. The defendant in such ease nun*, if the tary perform their dutfrttte con vict rd and punished. It had evep MWi held that the truth of a statement odght' tfi.have no rfftct In mitigating the ptyutmrierd, and that the same degree of chiimKimit might be meted out to a man publishing "what was true, a* to a man publishing win* wai false." Die London Morning ('hmiuclc, ?f the lath December, mvii , " The Paris Ktoile cites triumphantly the late verdicts in the court of kings bench, as tin answer tOall admirers of tlie English, lib ?njr 'if the press. The Ktoile may well'say, thct the liitevty of the press has do legal existence In England. It does; howev er, "xvst. Just as brigandage exists in vho'motmtatns of Rome mid Naples, not by tew, out in spite of the lew. The law with retf 4rd to the press is so detestable, DtM ju ries will not at alt times, have effect to It. It ?5** well remarked by Burke, that the tew in England is most tyranical, and that if it outd be e<iforued, the people would groan under the most intc^eruble oppressions but that pra. tically the people enjoyed a conskiera ?W? . effect ** The fierce contest at Athens, between the Turks and reeks, ha* oceastened many of the .noouments of tntkwjt;, particularly the r<triAtM0tt9 to be materially injured. The Lit- ofltvesmay be tepalmL but that dilapi d .metis as impniwbtelteklft talberwtsemel* ?tnciieiy. . t* ? t he " celebrated MMMMtlOx" te ad for sate IN r.M .iw.7 V .7. cnjiijrcu a c?Mi*Hiera le degree of liberty from the power which l?ey have to oppose Ha being carried into aggregate U^<XK),000, ;th? whole at i* purchase,) HHBh . IHo civilised world, uh a for the meridian. - J' V We invite an attentive peru.vl of the re murks ot-lien. Smyth, in the Lcgitffauru of Virginia! 'One fad mentioned by him was known tail Ji before, but we believe it Is now, Ibr the1 rat titm*, gi\ e.| to the public. We allude to the offer of a cmrte blunchr by Mr. Adams to Mr. Crawfoiil. The inference drawn by (it'll. Smyth, we think, U irrtittulilr. If lifr. Admits would, at Mich a time, attempt ti puehase Mr. Crawford, would he nut, whc*. necessary, bargain with Mr. Clay/ Col. Htruther of Mtoouri, hi company with one of the first naval officer* of this country, colled to see Mr. Crawford before he left this city, and in the course of conversation reutarked to him, that his friends were much gratified that he had refused to atocpt an office under Mr. Adaim. Mr. Crawford ?aid that he had long made up his mind up on that subject; for that pending the election, Mr. Adurns had oflfcrcd nim a curfr bluntht, to clioae his. station under. Idin, ill case he (Mr. A.) waa elected. 'litis conveimtiou was repeated to us immediately after it tran spired, in Mdreh, ls23,aiul we were author ised to make it public in the presence of Mi^or Armsteod, of Virginia, and several other gentlemen. There ait other circum stances within our knowledge, to confirm us in ouropinion, of the truth of what Genital) th has said: when we take into consideration the state of Mr. Crawford's health, and the known attachment ?f his friends to him, tlie reaton for the very liberal tender, cannot be doubted. Whilst we arc up*m the subject of Mr. Crawford, there is another fact which we thHik<c>mpcr to mention. It w <ts known tliat Mr. Crawford, mueli to his cre<lit, left the Treasury Di-paitmeni po<*r. Mr. Adams became the purchaser ol his plate, &e. and, as was then supposed, pidd 32834 22 for it ou^ of his own private purse; it turns out that it wus charged to public account. See the billiard table report of John Adams jr. receipt No. 1.? Ifaa/ihttfiQTi J'after. THE, FLORIDA INDIANS. We learn l>y u gentk-iuuu residing in Thomas county, in thisfttate, a ?Uort distance from Tellaliusscc, that information hud Ikcii received tliiouglt an individual from Florida, mi the 3 tii ult. tli.it the lioktilc Italian* ha driven off the U. S. itur*cyor? tiwi(cd on the contemplated riunl through Marida to the St. Mary*, and had al*o burnt or de stroyed the plantation belonging to Messrs. Curitocltan & Mitchell. The Florida volun teer* and militia, with it detachment of regu Inrs. were out in uurMiit of the Indian*, and the Georgia voiuntci'it within two days march ot' the line at the ahwu date. Since the above wun written, we have re ceived the feiot Florida tlerald of the 2nd iiiKt. from which we learn that W. Smith, F.h'j. returned Imin Vuluslu to thatplacc on au* ult. who cooimuntcatml ih*t he mw and converged with mhic of the chiwfs. There were about one humtrcd Indians .cdl lee.u-d there, and ull appeared to be under considerable apprehension lest the difficul ties with the had Indian* would make the white men enemies to them. Moth Hick* aiul Altncumjie had declared tlieir intuition to be at |*eaee. Incnnsequenreoffhc intelligence received, the following oAidiil order wui issued by (?en. Hernandez: St. .4ugu?llne, 20/A Drc. 1 .'26. ? S|K?The cxiirci* sent to the Italian Agency by Col. Murray, cominnndiug 2nd tx-gin.ent, with a view of getting information respecting the murde r* and deptydations al luded to m my ordeisot the 16th inst. re turned eight day * ugn, stating that tbfc injury done ??a such us had been reported. Hut that the chit f body of the Indians rcgcttcd this event, and were, togethfcf with the most influential men of the nation* ready to co operate with the U. S. troop* in bringing the ottendtr* to proper punishment.?Under these circumstances, ami there having been no demand made of me for military aid, 1 have now to request that you will di*miM the men of yiair comm*nd, ordered on duty, with my acknowledgement* for the servi.'.c rendered* and promptitude with which they I obeyed the call made upon them. I am with much reaped. Your obedient servant, V-' I M. HKRNANDRZ, Com'g 2d Hrig. F.M. Col. I. Brkwabd, ? Commanding 4th Regt. P. M. ^xolonTal trade. This question begins to ansume an interest ing character. The committee* of Congrcts have at length made their report*. They propone to close our poit* against the British colonial trade after th * 30th day of Septem ber next} with a proviso for the snapcuslnn of the act in either of two *pcelfted canea. Shall we adopt the bill? ? We look for a warm and animated diacus ?iem in both house*.?With a view of assisting th* reader to form some opinion of the cause* which have led to this embarrassment In our foreign relations, we l*y before our readers the following letter from Mr. Owen, of the Ifotiqpof Representatives* from the State of Alabama--for which we are Indebted to tlie Mobile Register! lVu?hington, Dec. 10. I Dkar Sir?The subject of public nature I that claims most of the attention oi the oA cer* of the general government, now here is ttollftc? o/the day a/tan, the commeri'lal re- j lati<>ns of our government towards the Brit ish government i great anxiety was manifest* ed in the state* ndjotniog this metropolis, upon the anticipated disclosures in tlie Presi dent's open messaget some of the wiseagres ware divining n proposal to fee submitted, on the part of the executive for retaliatory mea were conjecturing that wow It tre l of "rtr^lkit enemies hod 1 remote *(>i> eheotion that thu cue would l?c irremediable. To the correct understanding 4# this subject, not of lit tic concern to Mobile, ati&fenith Alabama, t will submit * aliort statement ?if fuels? The free enioyincnt of colonial trade has been a i?oint between tho British and American ptremiimb for ma My yoars fJnrfrlkiUan having timiriahly ri-fuM.il to place her colimlea on' tho aame foot.HR in Ikr commercial regulations u? wants otlior nations wish tho mother country) hut art IT**1 mat various were the interests oilier West India|KWM>*si<.ns,nNcon nected with the United States that In the year 1837, ut net of Parliament was unseed, placing the trade of the Went India Islands oi?d North Anrcrifcan possessions on u much more favorable fitting toward the United State*. An act of Congress of the aame year wm pasacd, deslgulng to meet what wo* thrn considered lUteral oo' tho l?art of the Biitlsh government. Ttaht art of Congress gave to the President power to open our port* to British vessels on a more favorable footing ?htiU lud previously existed, in consideration of the privileges granted In the act of parlia ment?this vaa to be made known to the woild by ptxwlainatlbn, which was Uaued; I Hit in n short time, there f< J k?wed from the Treasury Dcjmrtmcnt la cirvolar, *? direct ing that alien duties on tonage nod light mo ney 04 cents ami ten per cent additional to tho dutlea Imposed by law," should be levied i on British vessels arriving from \he same I colonics. The gwernment retaliated and charged in their colonics a tonnage duty of nearly ninety four and ten per cent addition to their duties: on the part of both panics theae cxac tionsnncratcd as revenue, and made the advantages in favor of the colonies at least ten to one nR?ii?*.l the United States, Congress again too'* up tl?r uihjcct, and In 183J, the president had 'hority to reel* procate duties vith t> British govern ment and upon nropcr evidence, that no greater duties on !ni|?orts ami tonnage being charged on their part, and no additional charge in any way, oy proclamation, to meet the act of parliament?-no steps has been ta ken?no proclamation has been Issued; our charges remain the same, and the British government ha* not changed hers. The open trade has continued even since under the proclamation of 1833, notwithstanding the higher duties and charges by the Britiah gov ernment. The British government has been ditpoaed to meet us by granting her to prohibit cer tain articles; this we have rejected, although the same articles art not prohibited by our government, yet the duty is so great ns to operate as h prohibition. If ac had with draw!. the alien duty of 94 cents and ten per ccnt tne British p.?* ? rnnicnt would have done the like, and then the trmlc from our conti guity and other considerations, would have occn highly beneficial. To meet us at this |K>iut, the British parliament enacted in 1033, and gave us tluit privilege, or to ctoae the ports of her West India possession*.?Con gress at Its last session, had tbfc matter sub mitted to them?the committee of commerce of the senate objected to legislating ami re ferred the matter to the executive for nego tiation. {?cn. Smith, of .Maryland and Mr. Vf. VI?bUm?, ably supported the plan of legislathtg, but ttie menus or uie ad ministration, to tailed, proved too strong. Negotiation has failed?It is now too late to legislate, and the nation sees and feela the conacqucncc. What is now to be done* Must we beg to Ixj permitted to legislate now? Or must we impose fuitlier restrictions In further retalia tions? Our fanners are now burthened heavily, and all south of Delaware must by this comic, ha\c much added to this bur then. *"or my own part, I will not underany clr cumstuiuc*, compnmit the honor of my country; nor can I, under semblance of this principle, strike ?? fatal blew to the agripul turnl inltrtM. There ate many considera tion* why, as Americans, we should sustain our shipping Interest?apurt from these, it U wholly unlnipoitant whether our produce is waited to u foreign market in Hritish or Ame rican bottoms. 1 should he glad to have tltr views of your citixcns u]ion tliis subject; it ht iif deep concern, and should lie well weighed before uny utttcluslon is resolved on. This shall be my own course, keeping steadily in view the substantial and im|MH* tatit interests to be subserved, and advance to their attainment, regardless of all iw/nar or /tarty considerations. The first act of parliament passed in June, 1822?In May, 1822, we passed an act of Congress in anticipation. In June and July of l?2J, the last acts of parliament have pasted, offering the benefits of the act of 1822, orof closing the ports as they now have tloue. Reports have been made to the Senate bjr Mr. J. K. Johnvai, and to the House of Rep rcscntativcs by Mr. Tomlinson on this Mb* Ject: ami n bill has been brought In, with the Intention of preventing the admission of any vessels into the ports of the United flutes after 30th September next* from the colonics and possessions of Great Drituin except Up per Canada With u provision for a suspen sion of the act in either of two cases, vixi 1st.' of the President ahull receive satisfactory evidence that the (>orts in the British colo nies and possessions are open to the admis sion of vessels from the Untied States pay ing no higher or other duties than those levied on Hritish vcsaals, and that our ves sels are permitted to export these from the ?ame produce, ami on the same terms aa Bri tish vessels, then this act may be suspended liy proclamation of the President 2dly, The bill proposes the provision which Mr. Gal latin was authorised to propose to the Bri tish Government, vtat that If the vessels of the United States are admitted Into the Bri tish Colonies or possessions paying no higher defies than the vessels of Greet Britain, and1 permitted to export thence to any except < tlon, nt either case the acts of Congrewui at IMS, 120 and 1?33, being all tltc acta re stricting this trade, arc declared to be re peated! the cfTrct of which repeal Khali be, to leave British vcnvli at liberty to clear front the United State* to any country what ever, as our own vcvkU may clear thencc. In the month ok April lost, we took occasion to aunnriheeto our reader", that an important experimental memoir no the subject of Aid, written by Mr Marcus Bull, h.ul been re cently read Ik faro the American Philosophic cat Society.M1?l? body deemed the ?T?ject of no ranch Importance, and so highly appro ved of the manner in which it waa treated, that they promptly decided In f*\our of its publication* and accordingly, 'in thssuccecd tag month, it appenred in their transactions. I'he experiments instituted by Mr. Bull were intended tp determine tha comparative quantities of heat evolved during the com bustion of sevend varieties of tacit as *1*0^ to s&ccrtain the relative quantities of tieat lost in our ordinary stoves and Are places. There are few subjects of greater practical impor tance, or in which all classes of society are more deeply interested, la a climate like oars, the production of artificial temperature, may l>e considered asatnong the Indispensa ble objects of sockity. It is ?;v vsit, recognis ed by erary age and condition, and the mean* '-?* *-11- fonn a heavy item of ex 'y,, If theq* we can be nientalist, what species r ihc greats quantity of heat for a given price, and aucv. what con structions of our stoves and.fureplaces will cause the least waste of temperature, he confers an obligation of the grt^tpkt practical value, - * We arc disnoacd to belle vc,tiiat the results obtained by Mr. Bull are sufgdtyntly accurate to enable families to solve tut interesting problems indicated above,naraely4 what is the cheapest fuel, and what arrangement U most convnlent for burning it? The principal results obtained by Mr. Hull are noted in two tables, placed at the end of his memoir. Our space will not enable us to notice the first tabic, further than to allude to the last column, which contains the most important determinations. The numbers here given represent the comparative value, when employed as fuel, of the principal vari eties of wood, anthracite coal, bituminous coal, ami charcoal, the comparison being made between the cord of wood, the ton or anthracite, ami the 100 bushels of bituminous coul and charcoal. Fbr example, the follow tog numbers represent the comparative value of the several woods and coals mention ed> Shell bark Hickory, 100 l'ig-nut Hickory, 93 Hcd-henrt Hickory, 81 White Oak, kl Chcsmtt White O.vk, 86 Darren Oak, 6<> Lchlgli Coal, 99 Schuylkill Coal, 103 Susquehanna Coal, ..99 Liverpool Coal. / 91i nillilwMJ CMil,/ Qos Fine Charcoal, 7 73 These numbers, representing the compara tive values of the several fuels in the quanti ties mentioned, alio shew what ought to be their relative prices, when equally cheap: When the price/ vary from theac proportions, it is easy to ascertain hi favor of w filch species of fuel the variation will l>e. Thus it is seen that the rotative value of shcllbark hickory and fichlKl/coal Is neurly the same, cord fbr too; so that If we could buy a cord of shell bark hickory for ?A, or 6 Jtaes loo, we ought to be able to buy a ton of l?ehigh coal for ?i,94, or fi times 99, to be cqjudly tltiap. ?The numbers given, seem to shew,' whatwc should not liavc supposed, that cord for cord, white oak is equally valuable tylth rod-heart I^W. and ought to bring the same pricet while chcsnut white oak is even mare valua ble. The second table gives t!?c results obtain ed by Mr. Hull, to determine the'comparative loss of heat sustained in the combustion of the same fuel, in the different varieties of fire places, grntcs and atovca. We have confined our remarks to the above branches nf Mr. Bull's cx|wrimental re searches, because they appenred to exhibit the practical importance of his results In a very striking point of view; r K would be im possible, without extending tftia notice to an undue length, to pass unto review the re mainlng experimental details %1iiett ire also highly interesting. All thfct wbltavs at tempted, is to awaken public uttcntfbrt to a performance, whose merit has n6t been suffl i icntly appreciated. ' ~ We are disposed to think that the ihade ouate attention given by our cithehsto Mr. Bull's memoir, is attributable in'a grst mes "J'T^tanot fallen Into-their hands. CWgiaal'vpuidishocr in the American Philo sophical Transactions it may be considered as not having been readily accessible for the generality of readers. HSit tbbdiffleulty has been recently removed by the republication of the original memoir, with some interesting 17SSSIft*}*' * Its pix'tent sbsp^, a thin octavo of moderate COM,?Mi tfon at (Jazrtlr. i ii iisaiiy. i usiu 7 ; OO'WMUMWBOIjnUL^ fttH'SK OF HRPWKHRNI^ATl VPA Mr. Wtcxi.irrr/asked leave to brine In a bill to regulate the proceedings of the Su preme Court of the U. States. Mr. Wtea(.i?7K siid, that he felt it hie duty tn explain to the house the objer.t be had In asking for leave to introduce the bill s <-ourt,in all oaewes ilcckled by (hat. emit, in Vttat/ss: jaggKtarag dsof one Htate of Ken thst rhe I/^v session of exercise ot ?very Lidjwiat At that or llic succeeding tijoe was oat allowed to mature anyi4MJ*P? tkejafa ject?'The weatern eu^1*^alBW<Wbr a liffiff it the liit imifli o( CoMiAjptA a hope that a number of Jnd|Wo(a?wy?an Court would be hmM Brl |hb ?thin [at tho ?^y re.gnty. did DOW Uownc th'j the shape el I the wUhc* of been so *" was net, and ought that drcishm. iltl MM whose land may claim, and to MMfe " - iih iM,w. ^ .. one intended to bimeftt Kentucky. Her Uu injnries in toture, to the Mn ef tide union that 1 propose to place around their aovreign ty i ll the guards which Congress can dol>y legislation. .giri bp Kentucky is not the only state which hen been compel Wd to bow her liraftft the foot of the national judiciary?-New-York, Penn sylvnnia, Ncw-Humi>?hire, Maryland, Vir ginia, Georgia and Ohio, haveeach la their turn been striped df some ef the pen which they claimed to exercise as noveretgt. states, and each In their tuea complauK<i; but their sister states turned 1 plaints a deafened ear. Wcv but their sister states turned ty these com ?Elpp j who represent states and cithiers of. states, on this Hour. should by proper legislation* protect then, from the probable' etfeots of thh powei, claimed by the federal judiciary, ef iavabdu - ting state, laws by the casting vote ot one' oi' its judge*. In process of time, it wiH unn: hiiatc the sovereignty of the states, and build upon its ruins a consolidation greatly to be deprecated, however much eomt polltkiaps may desire it. My otyeet ioaet- to. weaken the exnrciseof judicial power by the Supreme Court, but to give to it more couAdeuce by requiring more unanimHj# of opinion up?? I those great constltutiaoeiqutttioris wluefc it I may be called ontodecidei Midooosequently ?secure tothettates the* iMMWtuMftnal right*. teHSE MwrttrsxsseawE clal sanction in the courts of the state tie* pends upon'the opinion of n single judce of the Supreme Court?the court hemSfor*.. is safe thus to play with the solemn acts ot Ithc Legialaturc of a &utef I therefore trust that gentlemen will unite with me in nrckcnt - inK the nuUject for ftirther cdiMldeS?/^ Mr. Puwkli. rose to inquire it this was not a very unusual course of proeeodinc' The,ordinary mode adopted by mUmch Who wi.hedto have a biff dto any uanicula subject i.jtroduccd into the; ferns* w a, to offer a resolution proposing nn Inquiry oMheeub jeet by some one i4 the ?<*?**??. of thu house; and he wenuL whether it would not be better to let tkc mutter tako that course. - Mr. WtcKLtrrr. not expressing o?rfetit, thc having voted. - Mr. ttTaoNo, of taimhni *r the Hpeaker whether, if leave bo granted** select uommhtee must be appointedf The Hpeaker replied in the affirmative Andn committee of seven was ordered. ftKHAT&-4jb*a?ry 31* Ifc^T. . BANKRUPT HILL. On motion of Mr. Haynr, the bHlfor the esCablWhmcnt of an uniform mHw?of hank ? runtcy throughout the United tttutr*, wiv then taken up. and, Ott. the question of ou yjOMiIng tho hill fur * third Mr. Smith of South CaruUnft, driiverc.1 his sentiments at groat length, efftln* the hiii. ? ^'JT Ho was followed by Mcoank Bent** and and Hayne, on tho other 1 *?1 ??? the en, Hnuliftiiy, gdwunU, Harrison, ll ivi Johnson of Kentucky, Kino, Knight, Mi Kohbtos, Hilsboe, Smith of Mary 1?ad, ? I'homMk?>1J. .. NAYS,? Mean. Bttrton, Belt, Chandler. Chair, Clayton, Cobb, Dkkerson, Katon, Hendrkkft, Kinr, Macon, Mam* Randolph, , .f endrkks, king, Reed, Rldgeley ' Smith of Ho i ren, White f*99* ?-? ? Hn the bllt was rrjcctodf and Tho Honate adjourned. A CARD. ClaiuM Gbrardin |r AVif?. Skrai, INKoKMiMr f?lM^taH ? lUst lfc?y lMV*<i|MM*d ai. . sftsrir E&vmb i*lf? tufty fHi IM Pi ilfnrl r ASTKYCOilK laMbMUSlo ON I ?a nMlo houses amuT K 'NOES?? $ ?** ***** mm. Mm*