Columbia telescope. (Columbia, S.C.) 1819-1821, November 14, 1826, Image 1
COLUMBIA, (S. C.) TVESDAY MORNING, NOVEMBER 14, 1686.
eoi
???
?1- ' *
:..' 1 S**th-CmnUHm,
-fc'1 of iMjwri'^. .. v;,.. , lv j, .
' hieerlM nt I he riil? of
vscs&'M
ineo.?Thoe* fr?nn imhi
t b? eege*?|*ekil by the cuh,
reference, or thejr will recclve
?0?*I,UlBVl<*Dfll0^l.
Pr*m JQmkmtt't OtUen Ugtqf* ? R?mttnct,
b3??s"'
WIthl>. .mine eye* S? mnW?# III t MM,
HUIwd ?mld?f my lender Urwl;
L2M1
rjtUmihen
?IwitN iu# rtrinff,
mw-*1
? ?ojwmry *y
Vwke*)?long lo pley,
feucei ' .?'
v?' oy?ftoke*|. you In,
^you Inn it-ffrt your tin,
Hit Trttir ndUvr not Wortli n pinj
rb?Uirrebr?hell I *!?'
If h? Ruiin-.y inf.
\Vtmt, if ! beeltiio **nton V?>"
1 ynKmmwgSm^
W)tb aeny ? rodf
He will repny inc wltli ennoy,
BcMUM | Qo(|?
'(lien ill tkou wfuly on my kneo,
AmlM thy bower inv !???
Lurk In mine eye*, I' tike of thee,
O, Cupid,po lliou pity met
? - Bpero nol, but ij|e)? tfiee.
REMARK ABL12 WILL
The ItutvtUi arid tatament.of JPhi/i/t, liarl
if Pembroke Ay D. 1M0.
The following singular document of the Karl
of Pembroke, wm drawn up and regu
larly asserted tha night before his extru
tlonuttheToweir.v1} * gMitt curiosity.
I, Philip, late Rail of Pembroke mid
Montgomery, now Kalghtfbr tho county of
ilcrks, being, (as I aim to!d) very weak in
i?ody, but of perfect m^jftofy; for I rcmeiu-.
her this time five year* I.voted an address
to be made to my matter. and this time
twelve months saw htm brought to the
block; yet because death doth threaten and
stare upon me, who have still obeyed nil
those who threaten mei I how make my last
will ami testament. ? ' ~ ?
Im/i rimk.?Yor mr soul, I confess I have
heard moeh of souls; but what arc,, or
whom they "are for, liod knows, I know not.
They tell me now of another world, where
1 never was, nor do r know one foot of the
way thither. Whilst iht? king stood I was
of this religion i made my ton wear a cassock,
? and thought to make, him a bishop. '?hcn
?*ine the ABro/sand made inc a Prethyterian (
and since CromweJjl entered, I have been
an Independent. These, I believe, are the
kingdom's three estates, and if any of thrse
r nn save my soul, I give It to him who. gave
it to inc.
Item?I give my bod)', for I cannot
l;cei> it,?therefore Uujhikc. 1 have church
nas enough; but *2 hot
church porch?for I cm# a Jjord ami who
would hot be hurled vthere Cot. Pride wo*
torn.
Item.?My will is, that I have no monu
ment; for $?n I must hate epluphs and
verses; but all my lift long I have had too
much of them- I have therefore too much
respect Air my memory to have even that
item.*4 give my dogs, (the bent airs
thai ever man laid teg over) to be divided
aft&ig the council of ?tate, as fcheir musical
tonen may sometime* put them in mind how
necessary harmony Is for tho despatch of
huslnesa. Marty a fair day have I followed
my dogs; and followed the state both night
and day; went whither they sent me?sat
where they bid me, sometimes with lord's
and sometimes with commons; and now can
neither go nor sit. Yet, whatever becomes
neither go nor sit. vet, wnaievcr necomes
of me, let my poor dog* not want their al
lowance, nor come within the ordinance of
/Teas*?1 glvetwoof my be* saddle horses
u? the earl of Denbigh, for fear, 'ere long,
file %??> legs will fail htm; but.the tallest
and strongest In alt my stables, I give to'
the academy for a vaulting hone for all lov- ]
ers of virtue. All my other horses I give
to t?ord Fairfax, that when Cromwell and
?he states take away his commission, his
lordship may still have ?me A?re# to torn
<>tknd. {/j ? jLfrwfc.
Item.?I rive all my deer to the oarl of
"nlinltiii . who I know will preeervc them,
hcrause' he has already given a specimen
that way, by deny tog the king a buck out of
IhteMMU. ... '
//rot ?1 give nothing to lord Ha?? ?#A
t-uraey I will gWe him because I know lie
wTM l>estow It upon the po?r'
It em.?To the r ountesaes. my wile's si fr
iers, I now give lemve to enjoy their mate*.
Hut my own estate 1 give my oldest ton,
< barging him on my bVe^sing to follow the
advlaeef Michael 4 lids worth; for thought
Nave got 30,0001. per muivm. law not In
-W *lr Henry Mlldmay
with tiny-of -my jewel*. I
it icrved the duke of Huckt
} and since how he handled the crown
. m I?l lor both of which reaaon* I now
name hlo? the *nmv* of diamond*
. Item.?1 olam May, whose head I broke
at a masque, 1 rive Ave shillings; I In
tended him more, but from nil I have teen
of his history of the parliament* 1 think
that turn too much.
, I threntcned tir Henry
Mlldmay; but rikl not'tteat him, I give 40/.
to the mtmon who cudgelled him.
, ffem?To the author of the libet npnlint
Indie*, I rive three penctii and tlnce he
tlirow* what I* false on diver* name* of un
blemished honor, I leave him a farther le
gacy, which will he paid hint by the hand*
of the footman who paid oT sir Henry
Mlldmay'* arrears. This I do to hack him
the difference between wit and dirt, and to I
know ladie* that are noble frim those that
are not *6. .
ghrc hack to the assembly of di
vinea their cfanicaf, firovhieinf, tiadoftaf, i
eongtrfrathnnf??, which. word* I have
kept at mr own charge seven year*, but
plainly fina they will .never come to good.
A* I restore other men'* 9>ortU,
so I give Lieut. Gen. Cromwell one word of
mihet because hitherto he never krfit hi*
?im. -
Item.?To nil rich citiaen* of London, to
all PresbvtcHan* ns well as Cavaliers-1 giro
advice to look to their throats*- for the states,
tlio garrison of Whitehall have all good
poiniimln, and for nexo light* have bought
dark lantern*.
Item.?To the Rev. Mr. - ?, I leave
151/. per annum, chargeable on my estate*.
This 1 do to secure him from vpiuL well
knowing how subject a mm of well ^trong
pruts mid modesty is to tlint condition; that
has no frmn tiecv'e cbnnertions.
Itrn.? I |,i\ c nil my printed speeches to
tl^nsc person* following,, vix. Tnnt speech
which 1 made in my own dcfence when the
seven lords were act used of high treason, 1
give to sergeant Wild, that hereafter he
may kmw wh.it is treason and what-isnot.
The modesty that attended me on mv first
speech, I bequeath the speaker of the house
of commons ?* a Rift that lie must stand In
need of In that cxnaultcd. station. Hut my
speech ut my election (wliiuli is my sncccfi
without an oath) I give to those who tafcc the
engagement, because no oath has been able
to hold them, all my other speeches tf
what color soever, I give to the academy,,
to help sin Rnlthager's art of well ?peaking,
Item.?I give up the ghost.
jr*pn THS. MOMTWKAl. 1IKRALI), 1*.
COMPARATIVE INTELUf iliNCB OF
THIS BRITISH AND A MICHIGAN'S
We have frequently observed intlir Unit
ed States Journals, statements of the com
parative number of newspapers in vxi*tcncc
in Great Britain and Amcrir.n; rw<l became
there wei* more such establishments in the
latter country, than the former, it wo*. al
ways inshwratcd, wither directly or indircct
ly? that the desire for reading and Informa
tion wnsmwli stronger in tlic United Statu*
}han in our mother country; and tlint the
ntalllgcnco of the inhabitants was in pro
portion to thin *up|M*fcd desire.
It linn often been remarked, thnt there in
scarcely any insertion, however absurd,
that will not obtain some credit, if it lie fre
quently, repeated without correction or con
tradiction. It is u conviction of the truth of
this axk.m that iiidutcs us to take up our
pen on the present occasion, to cum-et the
above statement. We must premise, how
evcr( that mtr readers are not to suppose
front this, that we agree to all Jonathan's
statements which we pass over in s'lenc?\?
No iuch thing. There arc paragraphs fre
quently Inserted in the Amcricun depart
ment of our paper that we had much rather
not be askca to swear to; but wc quiet our
conscience, by the rcflccthm, that we leave
them to the judgment of intelligent readers;
and that they are generally of such a char
acter as not to I "ad to any serious error,
whether believed or not. For instance,' in
our American summary* to-day, there is a
ntory about a silk handkerchief being found
in the stomach of a cow; and although it
hod remained there for a considerable time,
it was not in the least injured by the gastric
juice. Now, some may doubt this, and
some may believe it; but, ns wc do not sup
pose that any person in consequence will at
tempt to feed his cattle on such/we
do not conceive that a serious inquiry in'o
the matter would be worth while.
But it Is very different with statements in
volving such extensive considerations ns
that which forms the subject of our present
remarks. The character for intelligence of
our brethren at home, l? ccnecrnecl; and it
Is not proper that they should lose their
, place at tne head of the thinking world,
i without an enquiry being made as to whether
they have dc<?ervcd the degradation. The
reiterated claims of the United States to
superiority, hi this respect, appears to have
made some impression on the journalist* 11I
Britain, and as many of our renders may
never have been *n situated as to know the
real facts c.f the case, we will suggest a
few considerations that may Invo 11 louden
cy to put the question in a Jaircr light thait
It lift* ever yet assuiwd.
, The American statement may bo summed
up in UW* following words:?" Although
fjreat Britain contains a population double
that of the United States, yet the newspa
pers established w it Inn her seas are oonslder
ably fewer than those hi that republic)" ami
from this they conclude, " that the inhabit
ant* of Britain arc less given to reading ami
? rninlry than those of the United Stat^i
ThH is a fair view of the question; and W?
will nose proceed t? \*y ?<>"?., shortly, ?
fw *1*ne reason*. why, admitting t%e ae<
cumcy pf the former pdrt.of their statement,
we refuse our mm* totheI ? iter.
X. There may be a jfrt*ter number of
jwspapef* established mime country the*
Mother, witllout implying a greater desire
for reading on the pert of its Inhabitant*,
because each of these iriky Wsue fewer co
pies than those of the othe* How, thiais
actually the case. In the comAiIum under con
?Weration. It appeared Aw e eutement
Srlntad by order of parliament, three or
mr yearn ago, of the numbfer of stamped
?heels made use of in <me year %hi .London,
that the Average circulation of the5 THmta
was nearly seven thousand |?er day, and that
the other daily papers generally issued from
three to six thousand each .impression.?
Tlte circulation of the weekly Journals was
greater still. The OAitervrr issued about
fourteen thousand a wcekj the Butt,
eight or ten thouaaiKland all of them sever-1
mI thousand*. Now, there b aothiug like
this to be found among the fMamleef the
United States. It b not very long ktnee on#
of then* estimated the united circulation of
three dally papers in NeWs Y<vrk at four
thousand, or not r.early so ranch as that of
one London Journal. It would he quite as j
logical to contend, that becauae the xurfacc
of the United States comprise* en iufhiitcly 1
greater number of acres then that nf Or cat
Britain, that the quantity of grain raised
would be pronortionnbly larger, as to nay j
that because there nre more newspaper ??*. I
tabllshinents in the United States there arc
Bwrt sheets printed. The vast extent of!
territory of the United States accounts for
the number, of Journals established; but it
Is quite certain thnt many ot them have
only a very small number of reader*.
2. But even grauting that the numltr of
thertt issued lit the United States exceed#
those published in Britain, It still would not
be a proof that the Americans were more
ex en to reading than the people of the
nited Kingdom. A daily paper in the
United States costs ?10 a yctta. while one ,
published equally often In Britain, co*t*
nearly i?10 sterling. The same dispropor
tion in price exists in weekly, ?eml-wcckl}-,
and three tinu* a wceek papers. The na
tural consequence of this is, that a great
many more people read one sheet in Britain
than in the United State*. It Is no uncom*
mon thing for twenty people to peruse the
came sheet. Wo have seen a'paper In pro
Srett among its readers when it was more
inn a week ??hl. Now, as the intelligence
which newspapers are calculated to convey
is not comiminlcutcd .by the simple act of
printing, unlcKsthev be also rend* wo think
this view of the sublect should betaken into
convhlcrntlpn next tihje nn estitmfte of the
leading putitlu of ttlC two wimlKll |S at
tempted to bo nlittle. In nil Scuthitkl there
nrc, to the best of our rccollectlen, 4f> pub
lications of newspapers in otic week, while
in Canada we kinfw of 3.1, or ??ue to two.??
But the populathui It scarcely ooe to three,
and of theae :? majority are "French# who
cannot read, however willing. Now, ac
cording to tlie American mode of estimating
mutters, the people of Canada should be
much more given to enquiry, ami much
more enlightened tlmn th<*e' of Scotland!
I'hiH may i>c the iw; lint u>itil we ace some
proof of it, we will iontcnt oirselvep with
nnncthcr solution, which i?, that white u
semi-weekly puper in Canada cost* only
twenty shilling* currency, one of the hime
kind in Scotland costs thrte tfuineca. In Ire
land the paper* are better circulated than
in Britain; hut it is not ItctsiiM' the Irish are
more given to rending, hut because the stamp
dutv (mi each t>heet in Ireland is only So*
while hi Kngtand and Scotland it in 4d.
3. The quality of the Journals of the two
countries is an important brunch of the sub
ject; and there enn be no question made as
to where the superiority lies. Tin? news
papers of fircat Britain, in general, arc
got up in a style in every res|H-ct superior,
as vehicles of intelligence, to those of any
other eountiy. The expense laid out on
them and the talent employed in them,
(particulaVly in London) In incalculably
greater than in any other nation. We
have been credibly informed, that some of
tqe London morning papers pay t/iree ihou
tund fidundt each for reporter* during one
session of purliainrnt, asifnt not only incre
dible, when the admirable way in which the
debates are given to the worid, it taken into
consideration. The reporting of law and
police cases costs an enormous smi, being
Iiald for at the rate of thrrr fivitx 'irr tine.
distance with tlicoi i? irithmg, when any
thing to Interest the public in goin(> on. We
recollect of the Morning Chronicle sending
reports four hundred miles to take down tnc
details of n public dinner; ami, front the
mode in which they travelled, the expenee
could not lie less than-Dim! This, however
surprising it may seem here, is no uncom
mon affair with the London Journals, and la
only mentioned because it rame under our
own observation. During the rcctss of par
liament, and when there is nothing of great
Intercut at hon>e, some of these establish
ment* send out gentlemen to travel in for
eign countries, to collect whatever qccurs
there, of interest to the people in Britain.
During the late iniquitous invasion of Spain
by the French, the Morning Herald hid a
correspondent in that country watching the
whole progress of the war. In short, when
any thing which will improve their journal is
in view, expense is completely disregarded.
But there is another matter which dc<
serves to be taken Into consideration, In es
timating the characters ol the newspaper!
of Britain and America. Here, and in the
United States, there I* no tax upon adver
tisements, and consequently they are insert
ed very cheap, and many articles of tntiinf
importance are advertised in them, so thai
the principal United Sites' papers hava on
ly a column or two to devote to general In
Ibrmttfeo. In Brltafe, 'every advertisemen
pay* Ss. M duty (tr eOch fcsertien. 1 h
cowqucnw Is, that the advertisements rat
ewttjr are fewer, more Important, and of*
toner changed. The greater part of them
are not inserted oftenerJMn ooce or twiee.
More room la left lor newt; wd ware any
British journalist to more than half
of hla sheet to be devote* fctMvertlseineaits*
he would soon And hi* renders falling ofT. -
We trust that a perusal of thb article
will show our readers, that it is not *o much
the number Of newspaper* printed, as tnfe
number rrerf, and the qualltyof the papers
themselves, that wo are to look,to as Indi
cations of the Intelligence of a country; and
that the Amerioane have yet no right to as-j
some- a superiority. We have np wish,
however, to detract from the character of
the cklxens of the United States for Intelli
gence. The existence of public journals In
the most remote districts is greatly to their
credit, and we wish jthem all auccess. We
merely wished to correct an error, which
may have arisen from ignorance of the mats
we have stated above.
? Vf* nrs psifselly swsrs that Core's Liverpool
AilrsHissr Is generally filled principally wKh ad*
vefltsoinsats, hot thai is Ihe only oee we know
In CnkUimI, end >? e?*lly ar.coittited for, fjr??n the
romm crolsl r.haracUr of (ho district wheru l? Is
fioltUahrd. We vealwre to aawrt, howsver, that
lliew are very few of lit lesdrr* who do not tska
?oroe olhsr jonrtsl.. '
KROM TMK NATIOKAI. QA7.T.TTK.
MH. POINSETT AND MR. WARD.
Wis find .the following article in tlie Lon
don Courief of the 12th -lit.
We copied, a few days since, from an
American [taper, the following paragrapht
" At P?*Jf dinner, fcitren on St. Pat
rick's day, incite city of Mexico, on Mr.
Poinsett, our Minister, expressing a wish
for the emancipation of the .Catholic* of Ire
land, he wan warmly replied tobj Mr. Ward,
the British Charge d'Affuira, who defended
the polk') of hit Government; to which Mr.
Poinsett replied with calmness and courtc
*v, and was heartily cheered both Uy the na
tive* and the British subjects present."
A gentleman, who^sViow Hi this coun
try, and who lias distinguished himself both
in the politicul and military affairaofMexkyi,
writes to us thus on the nbnvb paragraphs?
"I was 'tot only present, t>ut'ulmost clo*c
to Mi*. Poinsett at the time, and the real case
wan exactly the reverse of the statement.
Mr. Poinsett committed himself groaaly,
and Mr. Ward's conduct was moat proper
and gentlemanly. Such being the case,
whether you will consider that any further
notice of the subject ought to be taken or not,
you alone can decide; but I realty think the
qmryae MnoraMc is due to Mr. Ward, who
merely resented * moat Improper Interfe
rence on the purt of an intrtetiing foreign
Knvoy, in atiaira exclusively British."
On tlie subject thus mentioned in the
Courier, a communication from a very res
pectable American in Mexico, has been in
our hands for aome month*. -The foregoing
British statement ?ccms to require its imme
diate publication* and we, therefore annex it,
in the. belief that it will have all rfuthority,
in thla country at least, where Mr. Poinsett
ia too well known to be supposed to have
" committed himself ^rowdy," ami been
guilty of. * an improper interference in affaira
exclusively British.*'
Mexico, March .11*/, IflCfl.
1Jf.au Sin:?An occurrence lately took
place here, of which I deem it proper thut
Irou should be in possession of the particu
ar*{ not that there is any necessity they
should be published now, nor is it desirable;
but, as this matter has already nmde some
noise here, and as misrepresentations may
find their wav into our prcsa, I am anxious
Sou should nave the means of correcting
item, should they he made, and beg you to
do go.
Mr. Poinsett and myself were invited by
the Irish gentlcmci. in this city, to partake
of a dinner on the day before yesterday,
el'cn In celebration or St. Patrick's day.
There wen* eighty or ninety person* at ta
ble, of which at least four-fifths were Eng
lish. A toast waa given, highly compli
mentary to the United States, and was re
ceived with applause and enthusiasm. Mr.
Poinsett, feeling himself called upon to
immediately expressed himself as
Jowfct
" The generous sentiments which dictated
thla toast arc neither new to me nor unex
pected. The aont of St. Patrick have lifcn
long known to me. They arc to be fouii;)
In the land which has been emphatically
and truly called " the land of the free, '
among our most useful and distinguished
clthtens. I have lived with many of them on
tcrnia of intimate friemlshlp, and have learn
ed to appreciate their worth. The interest
With which the Irish nation has inspired me?
an interest growing out of their frank ami i
generous and mnnly character?-Induces mej
to indulge a hone, that the day is not fnr dis-1
tant when the Irish Catholics will be placed
in the full enjoyment of the same civil and re
ligious right*, which are enjoyed by all otlt
craof then' fellow subjects, simI to which their
many noble qualities so eminently entitle
them. In uttering this wish, I do but ec.ho
the sentiments oi the most liberal and en
lightened statesman of Great Britain, who
have labored to produce this important and
desired result, it is indeed a consummation
devoutly to be wished. And while I return
you my' most aincerae thanks for the senti
menta contained in the toast iust given, and
for the cordial manner in which it was rc
ceived, I beg leave to express a hope, that
tho sons of Patrick, whether they dwell
in the bosom of their native reuntrv or on u
foreign land?in Kurodc or America?may
enjoy the Inestimable bleising of civil and re
^fheleaSTl'mcnts were received with W
tsnl lone continued applause. After th<
lapse nMUP<*r ? wenty minutes. Mr." ard
reply,
follow
$"-15s3s?B
ifpkSi
^ ? * ? ** " ???f
previously
? should be
^ occaakm. J
ucstion had been w
rlf bound, as tfie rep
' Government, to smy thai he heon
to the Irl#h people the enjoy m
4ml *tll?k^s liberty. so far as mi,
orcWU?SMr*lkk^siaM :rty.a*feri
be com)stent with the safety of the
dynasty of Great Britain." These '
Me e'mlSmcnt6
M& Poimett, astonished that his
e thus roiifccchH. B. M'i
nSSSkaiM
gentleman mentioned Aarf "
respect to the subject of Irl
cipatiotte he had not been I
that as such was the ease, he was sot
had touched the subject; that, I
having done ?0| he could but repeat.
sentiments he had expressed were sincerely
lelt by him, ami he believed by the most en
lightened and liberal of the statesmen and
people of Great Britain. I.
Mr. Ward then stutc.l, that ho felt not In
the least degree offended at what had been
?twted; but that as the -representative of H,
B. M. he had decned It Ids duty to express
himself as he had done. lie then withdrew,
together with the ministers of thl\ govern- (;
ment, who witnessed this singular SCeMli"^
ami who can lutrdl). I iduuWl think, hay*
derived impressions from it very ftfvon*b1eJ?
his II. MVevoy or government.
Mr. l'oinsctt was about tottkohi* lcavo
also, when he was earnestly requested by the
President el the day to remain. That offi
cer then .expressed to him, in the moat eor
dial and handsome manner, h'ui thanks and
those of the company for the sentiments ho ">
had expressed, and declared bis and their
entire approbation of them?which de
claration was ratified b) loud applause from
the whole table.
Mr. Poinsett, thru again addressing thtt
company, expressed his regret that the har
mony of lh?r evening had been interrupted
by nny thing which had fallen froin him,
ami said tliat he would avail himself of tht>
present occasion to declare that he had no
wish whatever to Injure the British interest*
in thia country, and had ricvar' taken any
| measures with that view, though he was fully
aware that such measures had been impu
ted co hint; that he cumi: here, and was here,
| ui support the Interests of his own country,
but tnntlie sincerely believed those interest1*
clashed in no way with theinterestsof Grcac
Britain; oq the contrary, he'believed them
to he in perfect harmony; that the United
States asked not,, nor would they accept,
any exclusive privilege*; and that he wtiuhl
most t-hcerfully and cordially co-oneratft
with the agents' subjects of His Britannia
Majesty here, toward the establishment in
thl* country of the most liberal principles of
trade,politics,and religion.' .
1 cannot close this communication without
stating that these occurrences were suppress
ed In the account of the dinner published
here, by Mr. Poinsett's interference uid at
the urgent request of the Irish committee.
I send you tho Aguila, containing the ac
count. This statement of the affair 1 vouch
for, as it paused In my presence.
rami i.oi i .vii.i.k, (a*) rnai.it-Aosxaruca.
.4 Contfi/uUcnf Candidate.? Mr.-iWfd
Morr'n, the administration candidate for .
congress in th? Cincinnati district,' madethft
following declarations, in addressing th??
voters at a regimental tnustcri
MI wish you to understand, gentlemen,
that I m not opposed to General Jacll?*i?
if you arc in favour of him?but, believing
that the representative ought In every situa
tion and under every clrcumrtance to be
erned by the majority of his constituent*
when their will Is clearly and fairly n?e*r
tallied, If a majority of you are oppose*} to
the administration, and are In favour of
(ienemt Jackson, then I say so too with all
my heart, and will raise up both my handa
[raising them up at the same time as-high ae
his head] for Gen. Jackson. And If a ma
jnrity of you should l>o for Mr. Adanm '
then, will I hold up both my h*nds for Mr.
Adams. These are the principles I recog
nise." ? ? -? >
a
Royal iJiuntonrf*.?The N. Y. Timet,
| some day* ago, published an account of the
I H^ycral diamonds belonging to the rcfUla
of the Ituropeun Monarch*. The following
paragraph from a Hamburgh (Germany)
paper will supply nome Information not eon.
Time *
largest utainonus known in Kurope, it will
seen, thMt the king of Portugal wmiWK t
very largest. The diamond of the empei
of liiutia wcIrIu 106 carats; that of the kl
tallied in the Time*' account.
Xtng of PortuRa?* tUamomt.?Prom the
following statement of the weight of the
largest diamond* known in Europe, it wilt be
mc? the
emperor
? the king
of France 13^; that of the grand duke of'
Tuscany 1.19; that of the great mogul 8Mi
?hnt of the king of Persia 493; and that of
the king of Portugal lfilO caret*. The
value of tliin last it estimated by the Pottu
gue?e jeweller* at 200 millions of pounda
sterling; by the Prenth jewelleni at i960
mlllionaof French llvres; and by the English
nnd Dutch jewellers at l*,W,J00 pounda
sterling. (J/i0,000,000.)
[WJiat an enormous sum has been lost to
these countries by having su*h a quantity qf
dead capital f ]
A number of cillcens of Philadelphia
forming thrmselve* into an " Ami
Greek I.egion,M end ire nlxiutto raM
for Itsrwitnt bv nnbllc #?b<ctlptle*r.