The Camden chronicle. (Camden, S.C.) 1888-1981, October 16, 1903, Image 1
VOLUME XIV
CAMDEN, 8. O.., FRIDAY, OCTOBER 16, 1903
TILLMAN ON STAND.
?' ?' | ' W,
Defeodaat in Famous Ca&e Witness I
>> <.
In His Ow? Behalf.
MUCH INTERESTING ^ TESTIMONY,
"J1 4.* *?-^-*5-- ?*?*># ^
Stood the Odcal of CrossExsmln*
^ton With Fortitude and 5j>Qk* tttj
3* JPIrw Vale*. I
-UHngton. s c.. Special.? ft* the!
Tillman trSH Wednesday the defense j
flUt rea^wei] the. motion' to- have the 1
~ "jury Instructed to disregard all_testl~!
iauny relative to tlm p&aeeasTdn ot a
? Weapon by the defendant a day dV twp
prior to the shooting, contending that
ttO connection ha<l been shown between
that aad th* shooting. The Court ruled
, that the testimony was competent in
view ot the testimony glYeri* by wlt
tteases for the State. .
Bdltorlals from Tho Columbia State
relating to J. H. Tillman were then
read and affirmed in evidence by tho
defense.
In ruling, on a point in controversy
affecting the introduction of editorial^
the court stated that the purpose of
th? editorials being admitted was to
!i::MQW the feeling existing between thfj
defandjwt and N. G. Gonial**.
fjatrly good progress was mado
Wednesday in the examination of wit.
ncsBPg f%r the defense.
The first witness called Wednesday
by the defense was T. D;- Mitchell, y/bo
was a resident of Columbia In .1902.
Me waa asked If he had. had any eon*
versatlon with N. G. Gonzales in 1902
in whfch this~hame "of 3. H. Tillman
"was mentioned. -He replted In the af
flrjnatlvft, saying, "1 think It was.some
time in September, Jqat after pne of
these editorials In his paper waa pub
lished." .0
Jtie said he met Mr* Gonzales In the
street, and, asked by counsel to detail
-the conversation, said among other
things that be asked Mr. Gouftales If,
he didn't think It was about time to i
let Up un Jim. Giving Mr, Gonealee"re
ply, (he witness stated ho ssttl: "I can
slap his faee and he would not resent
ft," The witness further stfcted: "He
i_ said if he ever bats his dyes at the I'll
fill him so full of lead he can't tote It
- 01 t!? witness said ho told Mr. Till
man of the conversation. On cross
oaeminatton -he said he never had any
other conversation with Mr, Gonzales
than this. On further cross-examina
tion witness said he k**ew Mrs. Gon
: tales-, by sight, but never was intror
- duced fb him, and .fu.rihfir. thBf hrt had
few" days after the shooting
-that the conversation would be ?oo.d
evidence fo* the derendairt. He aaid he
?. tjsfld JSJinpathlaad with-Ambroserffoor:
" j. fe. Flower^ a street railway ?>on
OBCtttriti" Columbia in 1902, In answer
' cototusel for the defense, said that
1902 h9 Had Jheard- a- crinversatton
^ mm and
r^tr^JiTtJolumblar!
the conversation, . the
I"! had a big load of
r%aa RQing yonnd eol
" helping the ladles and
J . j&L Dijfctti^oae-tflh
they were i
li&jfg puliuts, thu Uhw uieu mid]
?=anrt-r jnal- ?K'Criiear&
ar." / /
.Nclson^Sie^ajwrft talking to)
the wltnes " repHe&^Md
vernor's office fhaV ha- wdtit
k> seated, because he would ktll
iftraafd he did not think anything4
V of the remark at the time and on cross
examination said It was not until two
*g? that he told Tliir.raiia iif
rmmtr to further question? ^d' h'e
wrote" to the defendant. The letter waa
Introduced by counsel for the defense,
uftnd.ih it the witness aald lie would
~lqiljnir aa a wmieealf^<r?ruld be .of
? any serrlco." Ho was a member of Col.
-Tillman's regiment. -
P; W. Hughes, of War ronton, said
he was In Columbia in 1002 and while
down Main street with four
, .Hon he Trained, they met Mr.
f Gonzales. A Mr. Stroud pf their num
ber, be said, was asked' by Mr.. Oon.
sates about the mill rote; He said h*
wf. wwitatcrirl!?- dTffTrorrtitiiT
had done Mr. Tillman* great, li
ce, to .Which he said Mr. Gon
I replied that he *would *et great-,
justice after electlo* and it ought
Jefcd" On erosn-examf nation the
<] he had only, told this four
r '"JSJgust Blialock testified that he was
with Mr. Hughea at the time and that
-fc<Hwar4 thl3 conversation. , ., r:K
N. B.' Cheshire, a printer on atl An
d*wwn, S. C.t newspaper, was asked
r*?itate what he t?>J.4 )3UaaA<0^ . adL '
? - --?pa mvify^ ?SJw J
co Tin or. I- . tor1 lit,.
:ryrm
made by Mr. uonzaies
H. B. fHmms, a man whom he did hot,
know, but whom he wae subsequently
told was N. O. Gonzales, met them and
that Mn. Gonxales asked him if ha wan
the man who was out riding with Mr.
Tillman.
"I told JjIoj I was/' witness aald, ad
dingi "Heoaskad me where be *?s at,
I told WnrI left him sUudJug at the
transfer station." H. B. stroma,
Grotoiteville. gavo similar teatlm-vny. \-j
R. 8. Anderson, of Kdgefleld, an em- i
ploy.e cxf the United States Senate* af
ter stating that he waa in K<1gcife|<j
Coring the summer of 1902, denial u?t
l<e had held any conversation with Mr.
Tillman in a livery fttabifr la JBdtaflem.
In which tho expre*sU>u "get at bln>"
AWSd, or that ha had engaged In
?ny conversation with Mr. Tillman re
garding Mr, Gonxates, as testified to la
the trial.
James Davis, the laBt< witness called,
[ had hut begun his testimony when
Judge Gary ordered an adjournment,
that the sick Juror might not be' over
taxed. ? ? v " " . ' : '? .
James H. Tillman whs oa the stand
Friday over foujf hours, a Witness In
his own behalf. For full one hour he
waB subjected to the Are of cross-ex- ~
aminatlon by counsel for the State.
But one other witness was placed on
the stand by the defense, after which
(he defense rested; Witnesses in re
buttal placed on the stand by the
State were heard during the closing
hours. Splendid progress was made
toward the conclusion of the trial, J
which has already consumed nearly
two^woaka.
The defendant his testi
mony, was asked as to the impression
madegjjpon him as to Mr. Gonsales'ji
feeling toward him by tne editorials, a
number of thbifc being indicated by
title, and . replied that they impressed
him as intanfeely titter. He said he
did not make threats in Edgefleld~or
on a train . : ? ? "*TT~T.
___lThe defendant was aek*d with refer
ence to? statements attributed to him
while engaged in conversation in his
room in a hotel In Columbia on Au
gust'20 or 21, of last year. He said:
"The conversation Dr. Adams0 refer
red to took pl&ce when a number of
my friends were in the room and it
was a runniug ^general conversation,
Sometimes I wopd be talking to one
ana sometimes to another; sometimes
'three or four would be talking to me,
Somebody came in the room and to hi
mei about some new rumor as to what
Mr. Gonxalea would do to me, and I
mado the remark that if he attempted -
^fodo that^I don't think I said as Dn
'Adams aald, 'Snuff his light out,' but
' ? - htto, I would kill him,' I think.'
He said furiherr-'-f -h^ been told in
at least a driven places in South Caro
lina that Mr. Gonzales stated that I
dare aot come to Columbia and say
about him what I had said on other'
stumps In the campaign." He said the
different statements wer<s- matte ? hr~
connection with rumors of threat^ re-'
-jftortsd to hlro. ?
.5??: ?
had been reported that the Opera
House In Columbia; where a campaign
sseetins to-fco hsld was to be
packed and that he was ndt to be let
out all and he stated that he ?ald
r?lu^wpi^ ? Ml
.lab Tjy>n 4^| f f jfc ^ Ml .'i 1. ' 1 -"*
m sotitii t^aroima
When closely questioned he stuck
to his original statements.
? ?. ' f ????
011?:40f 111? Stilt
B^gmanv ^u <
he^Hr. Tillman maki
gWnst Gonrales. 0n croc
he said he did ttof-know
Black.
Col. L. Bleaae, who said be has been
a member ol the Legislature and that
? he was with tbaLdereAdant tofougbout
the campaign of 1902, was asked If be
was present. Ift the defendant's room in
a hotel In Columbia onthe"fcight of tho
at the
me Dr. Adama was there. He,.- an
swered 'that he was and said he was'
reading some editorials from The
State, that be might be In position to
reply to them in hi* ipeeeh. His at
tention was cnlied to tire testimony of
Dr. Adams relative to a eonveraatioh
that took place in the room. The wit- .
nefif said that part of the conversation
was directed to Dr. Adama and nart of
it t& IfiaVwMkft-kqar^^a htTtih
man. Witness thea in answer to ques
tions, said Dr, Adams advised Mr. Till
man 'J to go dowf-to The State office
and fight GontttJe* " and that the de
fendant said "he wu Lieutenant Gov
ernor and could uot afford to have a
difficulty; that *he would be impeaeh
tMNrlUiesa. "sp^efeody^
about thaV tim? made a remark about
m
"fHrlifiYi wlA** n 1^ biwffiiil
TlnkSr wSh1 reSrtnce to another
statement attributed to defendant^]
the&tri
rfaa read, what Mr. Ttllmes aald was
ncaa wiid be told Mr. Tillman that
night what had been said.
WIUKzs said he w?i just behind Sen
ator Valblrd; Lieutenant Governor THI
rnau and Senator Brown, a* they ap
proached the tranKfj* station in Co
lumbia on the way down town from the
State House on January 15. Ho said as
h? eroaaeri Gervaia street he saw Mr.
Gonzales coming 1n the oppostte dlraif |
(ion on tb* outride' of th? pavement.
He said Mr. Gonzales crossed obliquely
?q th? left He could have pasted on
.his outside, he said, Instead of outting
diagonally across to the inside. Wit
ness said he heard Mr. Tillman say, "I
got yonr nu&Agge." Haseld Wt Mf -
Oontales thrust hie hand down deep in
his pocket and added tb?t he thought
Mr. (lonsalea was. going to shoot Mr.;
Tillman. He beardrtne shot, but said he
did not Me where Mr. Tillman drew
the pistol from. He said lieutenant
Governor Tillman was in the middle.
The .witness wan closely questioned
and ou crosK-examinatlon. with special
referctoce to certain conversations with
persons named.
M. C. Ix>rlck testified that' he waa
standing on the street across from the
transfer station; tlmt he saw Mr,. Gon
zales coming up Mfcln Stmt; that he
saw Mr. Tillman aftd two other men
cowing in the opposite direction. He
aald that\ when Mr. Gonzales got with
in four or Ave steps from Ml*. ?Tillman
he changed his course obliqely. Wit.
ness said IMr. Gonzales had his right
hand in his pocket and acted as If ha
was trying to get - it out. He beard a
report, he said, and saw * pHtdl lib the
defendant's hand.
Jfu cross-examination the witness
pKld it was on the opposite side of
the street from whe^e he was that Po
llmecan Boland arreated Mr. Tillman.
Mrs. M. A. Evans testified that she
was passing down Main street from the
State House on January 16 and that
ua ahe passed the transfer station she
saw Mr. Gonzales coming in the oppo
site direction. She said that because
of something she heard in the lobby .of
the State House she took particular
notice of hla attitude, manner and ex?
pjresslon, and said his facial expression
was Btr&ined. <
Mf. Mahaffey, a member,'?r the Leg
islature from Spartanburg at the last
session, said he noticed the neck of a'!
bottle sticking out of the defendant's
pocket at he State Houso the day be
fore the shootjntir.
J. H. Tillman. when he took .the
stand was asked by Mr. Croft to ex
plain this and that incident, to wbM*
reference has been made during tha
trial. After giving his explanation of
the South Carolina Club Incident he
was asked with regard to any message
he may have sent to Mr. Gonzales, aay
lng that he had sent a A-erbat xneasage
^to^him by George S. I^fiare aektng-kim
(Gonzales) to .meet . him la Georgia.
He said Mr. Gonzales wanted the in
vitation put in writing, but he wttl
afreid It was a trap. He said also that
he did not want to violate any of tha
dueling laws of his State. Answering
further questions thej^ifhtes said that
when he Was correspondent ltf' Wash
ing! oh for some Southern papw* Mr.
Gonzales was applicant for the poal
tion or consul general to Shanghai and
tfhat. h? wrotd bis papers thatilftr. Ootf
safi* would not be appointed and B*ld
"ftdt" words with him In a
hbtrt-ftfettrS* Wtmmo&lL MJaM*
Hi
Tour ijuugiit-TOmg-t'iggre gad turgfaY
arotrad offered iBem to thoee standing"
l? nptlcafl M*H*?sale*
I was 21 years o^'
The question of his military career
and the 'comments of The State was
then taken upy Mr. Tillman stating
ajnoag other things that Me. Gonzales
Wanted him courtrmartla|ed Mcaate oT.
an Incident which hft related.
Relative to the organization of a
company of Indian acouts; which ha?
been referred to, tlie.d.efendant artd Ji?
%anted to organise Such a company to
take to the Philippines, but that Pres
ident McKlnley and army ofllcers in.
Washington opposed it.
Asked how he wss treated by Mr.
Gonzales fn his campaign for Govern
or the1 defendant replied; 1
ul think those editorials are fair
sample* of It."
- -4U denied that he had ever been ??
traitor to his uncle and said he had .
not Intentionally been discourteous to J
the SeWe- He was next naked what
had been the attltode of Mr. Gonsalet
toward jjua^grlfc to 19Q&. to which h?
replied; "I think the paper has been
pretty well devoted to me since 1890,"
and In anstrer to a further question
*Md -the editorials In The State had
been extremely abusive of him.
<V .til. J -?? J, - ? . . . . >r? ^
-rz ?ssSKeS?
CASE GOES. UP FOR ARGUMENT.
_
Lexlnfton, S. C-, Special?The last
? .WWM>MW| M, V., p|FW t
. witness to be heard ttt the trial of
LSiyH- cbergwt Wttn th?l
murder crfrBdlto* Qons^eeu. Ml urn
?taod at* o'ctb^Bttv&ylJternoon,
thai conctadift* the taking of teatt
u*
State wan asked as to hia support for
" * certain .Republican candidate for
CongroBi. The State objected, Gen.
JB.eliinger saying In the courao of his
remarks that that wa* calling atten
tion to hla political standing. Judge
Gary- in ruling that the question waa
competent, said:
^Oenerally jfreaking, Mr. Bellinger,
I think your view the correct one, but,
Sinder. the peculiar' condition* do\Vn
hfere, it may effect a man's chwactur."
The State placed witneaaea on tho
stand .today attacking the veracity of
two witnenaos for the defenae. W. W.
Oeor, a traveling representative of tne
Statu, aahj that he did not make the
statement that Mr. Gonsales had a
pistol for Mr. Tillman and that a?
(Tillman had better not tackle him
. With a stick because he would get ?
shot out Qf him, a remark which a wit
ness for the defenae testified he made.
By agreement of counsef K was ad
mitted that Mr. Qonxales' eyesight
was defective, and that he habitually
wore glaasos, thus rendering It un
necessary to put on withesaea from Co
lumbia.
The State offered in evidence cer
tain records of the Street RjMlWAF
Company to show the noura during
which J. Flowers, who testified that
he overheard a conversation by Mr.
Qonzalee. had run cars In the <um>
mer of 1902, but, on Inspection, find
ing that the record sustained him as
to time, they were asked to be with.
drawn..?- ? ~
The defenae, In rebuttal, put on up
wards of twenty witnesses to testify ?
as to the good character of R. H. Hoi
senback. one of their ^witnesses, who
testified relative^* the shooting. <'
In fixing the M>gramme so as to
send the cake toptbe jury Wednesday
morning,'" Judge Gary said he did so
thai (he jury would have a full day
before it, for the consideration of Its
verdict Instead 6f sending It out at
night. Court adjourned shortly before
6 p. m. until ?: 30 a, m. Monday.
ATTORNEYS TALK TO JURY.
The Second Stage in Trial of Colonel
T<ll'm*n.
Lexington, g, C., Special. ? The jury
In the trial of James H. Tillman lis
tened to arguments by counsel .
throughout' the entire day Tuesday,, j
When court convened an unusually
large crowd was present; and by the
time adjournment was taken the room
was packed. The section reserved
for-ladies was 'tilled. The special
train which hag beep running between
Columbia and Lexington, was filled
when it went over in the' morning,
While a regular train later, brought
an additional number, 'Many difllerent
parts of the State were represented
Contrary to the programme agreed
jypon the arKunients to the. jury .< were
n<^%ROnel?<ied . When the hour of 6 p.
1 m. %rrived Colonel JCtsft, who was
closing- the argument for the defense,
t&i&iho could "act
time to permit Qenerai Bellinger, who
closes for the State, to conclude, un
less court should two until a late
hoot. ,lt ifrgft " agreed tha$lthe two" at
torneys could close In the morning.
Colonel Croft having one hour yet re
S^^hOui^^ThuS tfc* 1+tll
to the Jury before the-middle of th?=
day, as it will take some little limefOT
the court to deliver the charge after
tfrAt fny
re read and argued todajr I
^JEfeg-Jfote dfNBtrea that., thy Jury be J
instructed that the doctrine of self*
defense retires that if there Is any
reasonable safe wayoft'escapea man
-Wmt TS& K, and not take life; that in
order to establish a plea of self-defense
the jury must be satisfied by a pre
ponderance of evidence that the per- 1
sons making" tfce plea was not at fault I
In bringing on the difficulty, that he
believed he was i? dang^;^rMi?ns
%ptfHy" l?Tfo and farther that a per
son of ordinary prudence would have
believed the same. The State further
asks the Jury to be instructed that
previous threats do not , Justify the
taking or life, unleas there ^ Is a de
monstration at the time of the homi
cide. \
The defense asked that the jury be
Instructed that the question to be de
termlned wsa 'whethcr or not any per
son of ordinary prudence and reason
would have done as the defendant did,
also that a . man may act upon circum
stances as they appear to him, account
belief taken of any threats -that-nwqr
have been communicated to him, to
gether With the actions of the person
-making them when met
Colonel P/H. Nelson, for the defense,
after Addressing himself to the law ]
giving the interpretation of the defense
as it applies $o this caae, made a gen
eral revfew of the fase, stating that
It hss been transferred to Lexington
because of conditions averse to the de
fendant in Richland county. Referring
to the liberty of tfc*p?ee*.he sited the
and decisions to shew thee*-]
inut w iijif nberijr. tie then spoke or
"* iwrspapwrs sgaiwst-the .
fi^^W^Wehdaht
ON NEGRO OUTRAGES
Remarkable Proposition Advanced By
Minister.
CHARGED TO CONVICT SYSTEM,
i .... SL-. . . . ?
i
? ?
P. TJlfekletd's Opening Ad.
drop to the Evangelical AlUance?
L- Claims Chain tiangs >f? Schools for
Crlnr,
? -_hL
Cincinnati, Special, ?Dr. W. P. Thir.
kleld, corresponding secretary of the
Methodist Freedom and Southern
Educational Society, in delivering the
oppnlng address of the Evangelical Al
liance charged that the outrages of ne~
groes In the South was due to the
chain-gang prison systom. Ho said 1c
jart;
"Far be it from me to utter one word
In extenuation of the unspeakable
crime of which some black mo* "ye
guilty. Let us fceel) in mind, however,
that only about W per cent, of the j
black men who are lynched have ever
been charged with tho unapcakuble
crime against the secredness of wo- j
manhood. Let the black man bring ev/.
ery Influence t6 bear. to make
crimea impossible, -bet there be prompt
execution of the 'law against this and
all 'crime* of all men. Lynch law, how
ever, is anarchy. It brings In the reJgn
of barbarism, It brutalizes members of
mobs j it undermines government; it
does nm stop crime. In estimating
criminality Amonit the black people we
should keep in mind that since Appo
mattox nearly every Southern ?tat?
haV maintained schools of crlme?s?
orgaW?ed institution r for the training
of criminals. Thia I charge against the
cq?vlct leiiBe system, of the South.
"This system with Its thousands of
victim has been the cause of much of
Hie outbreak and crime among black
people ttm^igb t its brutallslng and de
hufUft.nl zing" influence on hundreds of
negroes. Under this system both prison
"and prisoners ar? farmed out under
the control of private corporations
sold to the highest bidder.
Tewiee the body and souT of"
convicts are assigned. The motive of
[ fcottr -fctotff and* i?M*ee is hot morals,
but money. It is converting crime into
a source of revenue, the brawn and
| blood of criminals bartered for gain.
"The outcom? of the careful lnve^ti
|p? p( the convict lease ayatem^?y
the present Governor of tleorgla waar
a revelation of inhumanity* barbarity
.nd ?banie!e*i tn.mor.llty. i
litf :r;*??oa: ofitw? WfcW;
of thf - ?
Southern prisons, Thlalc of i
McrtUl^aiM
that has ntt
_ -trffeafffo core
crlffipsed t?iat, uy its 1LC-IIJ-L,
saris rsM-gftf
rors of the system to deMttth and de
grade society.
? "Th? A?irth ?tinnlrl reform ItS P??S~
ent system and thus stop the educa
tion of criminals' The nraaant svitom I
? * ??wing of the wind and It la hound
to reap the whirlwind.^
Mr. Thrlnkleld made a strong plea
for ta?k philanthropic and Christian
1? w>th of the South and North to
hands fa education andffllSSt&B
efforts for the solution of this
grave problem.
Arguments Begun.
Argument to the Haywood murder
case at Raleigh, N. C., began on Mon
day.
The opening arguments In the TW
maa case were made on Monday.
Charged With Lare;iiy.
Newport Neva. Ye., Special ? A. *p
rant was issued &?re for the He v. Har
ry McKntght, who represents himself
to be the secretary of the National
Newsboy Association, charging him
With grand larceny. McKnight bat dis
appeared. He tunjed tip here six week# |
ago, rented a building and canraased
the city for' funds and for the estab- I
llshroeot of a local branch of the Na
tional Newsboys* Home ,
of a number, of tickets of admls
e*tea#|yely.. MoKnUtht, ae-v
to tha charges. sworn out
fettt, sold all t&e furniture r|
with, the proceeds <4 the sale.
TsBsgftsI ' '
TIKED OF DISPENSAKY.
A South Carolina Town That Want#
to (let Rid of Ruip Shops.
A apodal from Saluda to The Now?
And Courier report# Uiat town an being
tired <>f. the dispensary and gives the
further Information tnfct a petition/,
numerously signed, ta being gotten up
tolo gvt rid of it. The petttlon l? $$
follows; y
"To.y3L? JWonorAble Mombera of ths
Board ,of Directors of the State Dispon
??ry? Gentlemen; The underslgnc-d ras.
idents and citizens of the tow end
county of Saluda by this petition would
show: .. 1
"Flrnt. We know of no law making
provision for the removst' at a county
dispensary alter the ?ame has been e?*
tsbllshcd, r?nd for this reason thle pe
tition is addressed to your honorable
body on the presumption that your
body can act In the premises/
"Second. The <underSI|Ktie(l/hfeY$ not,
for the most part, ever opposed , the
dlspfensnry law, hut, on the other hand
have always and still consider it the
leaser of two evils. This statement is
made in order that *%n erroneous Im
pression may not .obtain in connection
with fole petition. - - ?
Third. The .undersigned have no
W&rd of complaint to make, -either
[.against the present county board of
cintrot of this county. or ngalnst the
present dispensary at this place, for,
an far ?a we know, both the board and
the dispensary have been and are yet
complying with the provisions of the
dispensary law.
"Fourth. The dispensary was'estab
llr.hed here' sevoral years ago, to-wlfc,
about or Just after tho town was lo
cated^ to tho best of our recollection
some time In April of May of 1897, and
your petitioners havo reached -the con
clusions hereinafter expressed, not in
a hasty manner,. but after several years
of close watching of results. on our lit
tle town and the surrounding count***
''Fifth: That before tho establish
ment of the dispensary here there was
no legalised place for the saii of whis
key' in thjs whole county? not even
within the present bounds df the ooun?
ty? and while we do not mean to say
there was' po whiskey drinking on the<
part of our people, ye* 'we dp say that,
since the establishment of the dispen
sary here the drinking haB wonderfully
ftM dimgeHftrtil y ? IftoreaaecF amongour
Jpoptos ' , 111
"Sixth. That while the town's share
of the net profits from our dispensary
annually iinount to a handsome sum.
illy rwered:-**- j
SBBs&gsi&gm
WMH. -- come due-'aftarM*'
While, amounting to something like
$3,500; yet, despite all this, after ageing
J ll-if iL- . - M . .. A. it - 1 1
fefred UK than -to see the
mmmmum
ion
the -Stftfelfci
:ii?de? committed wif , ^
months, and aa men, who thalf
townandCPuaiXjrajieplQre the facta
iipon whtch this ocMm U.h#?tdr3d3aL
having come to the* conclusion that
.the dispensary here Is responsible' to
some axtent-jai .least for the atata
klon lBc h^edd SriUmly ier*
Ing that the removal of onr^^ensary
Would change these condition, your pe
titioners respectfully ask your honor
able body to discontinue indefinitely
the dispensary at flrWT ~
"Ninth. .In order that ydur honor
able body may. he Informed to soma
extent of the character .<^aha aignat*.
hereto w? have Indicated in each In- I
Sianoa tha vocation of the signer. ? ? -
"To the end that the Saluda dispen
sary may be closed Indefinitely,' your
petitioners w!U aver pray," etc.
illnor BvMti of Mi? W?*k itt ?
Brief Form.
( SuntUra'u Phone Factor
Sumter, Special.?' fha *?jraW
The Tele phone,, for October <
the follow in* articles: ^Tinr
Telephone Manufacturing e
of flbmter h as recently added
building to Its al#?dyb?rge*t
meat. The floor space or
bniidlng WWrlW ?QQ
of floor space, nearly double 1
of the former plant, and wtl!
cupied exclusively a* an ass
department and stock room#
and manufactured* material, '
perimental laboratory and dr
HUWWra *Ml^Uii<^aiocat?dr
pullding lit.
lino r,f tel ephtaSP^ exchange
tntnts and switchboard* gave
types will soon be ?ut on
The principal need of the naj
ingy however; la to 4f>?re?se $
ent output, placing thfT toffll
better shape -to meet the cos
Increasing demand ftUL.lte: V
now so /*vorably fcnoWh ttif
> a large area of the United
Canada and Mexico, '^he lari
and successful business of tl
ter Telephone Manufacturing c
is a striking evidence of tb*4
Its officers, Messrs. C. T. MSsc
: M an ning .and & .<LJk ovWm;
whom has provon himaelf^ws
where they are ably ftcsltte
fajthful corps of employ*?*, lb
force now fast approaching
mark,s U^bW afy^^pl^
her of thorn are eklHed^wo^
\_ ; Interact In * he Fair*
TJi# iaterefit tat
waking up an&tfcfcifoj
lug articles bt4? fig?.'
mt: in iinaMMI
tmfft
I# ?o jtept&y
book. TheVwa?
9ivm tnmmm
ixfyM&ffit
la^ JixjoL:;
en m
tftjf 6
tori ._.
fop'<s?H*lo
^pursersbouhl
ready
tng this
the
mm
<^Oll4?
?frOTT'-tt#^
)}V '??' ?*:<??
m S"-;, r. ;. . . ^ s. ?.
? ?v.^2?s?c ;,isf/.wiJ y.v?
timnwi
" 5vm? * . ?c ' '.
'3* ' ' :
A I "?' i ? " '
?"? ? ? ' v