The Clinton chronicle. (Clinton, S.C.) 1901-current, December 23, 1970, Image 8
I
!
2-B—THE CHRONICLE, Clinton, S. C., Dec. 23, 1970
Nixon Is Behind
At End Of 1st Half
UPSTAGED
REAPPORTIONMENT MAY AFFECT
LAURENS COUNTY
Reapportionment will never catch
on as a popular parlor game. It’s too
frustrating. You get one district set
up and it throws another out of kilter.
But reapportionment is s o m e-
thing our legislators are going to have
to think about during the coming ses
sion. What they do about it will af
fect us for the next 10 years.
This is particularly an important
item for Laurens County because our
county apparently is one of the keys
to any reshuffling of South Carolina’s
six congressional districts.
Laurens County currently is in
the Fourth Congressional District
with Greenville and Spartanburg coun
ties. The 1970 census figure for our
district is 463,983.
According to standards set up by
the Supreme Court’s “one man-one
vote” ruling, a congressional district
should include 420,000 people.
We won’t go into all the possi
bilities because there are so many and
some are so complicated but what it
boils down to is this:
The easiest way to bring the
state’s congressional districts into
balance would be to move Laurens
County into the Fifth Congressional
District and move Clarendon Count},
from the First District to the Sixth
District.
The Fifth Congressional District
currently is represented by Congress
man Tom Gettys, a Democrat, of Rock
Hill and includes Cherokee, Union,
York, Chester, Fairfield, Lancaster,
Chesterfield, Kershaw and Sumter
counties.
By switching Laurens and Clar
endon Counties to other districts, the
state would have a variation of 4.6 per
cent from the perfect “one-man, one-
vote” standard. The current varia
tion is 6.1 per cent. However, that
might not be good enough. The Su
preme Court rejected a Missouri plan
which had a 3.1 per cent (variation.
There is also the possibility that
there will be some changes in the
Third District, served by Congress
man Bryan Dorn, also a Democrat,
and including Oconee, Pickens, Ander-
s o n, Abbeville, Greenwood, McGor-
mick, Edgefield, Saluda, Newberry and
Aiken Counties.
And there is the possibility that
the state would have to start splitting
counties, putting one part of the coun
ty into one congressional district and
the other part in another district.
That has happened in other states.
It’s usually the larger counties which
are split.
Whatever happens, it probably
won’t take effect until after the
primary in 1972. But now’s the time
to be thinking about it.
We have been fortunate in that
we now have a compact district in
which we have a lot in common with
our sister counties. We hope that in
the future we will be fortunate enough
to be in a district shared by counties
with which we have common interests
and hopes.
We also hope our legislators will
do their homework before the session
so that they can look after our best
interests.
BY GEORGE HAGE DORN
Chief Economist
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
MANUFACTURERS
Administration economic
policy-makers have been re
vising the game plan followed
during the first half of the
President’s present term in
office. Those of us on the side
line begin to wonder how much
this will affect the course of the
game in the second half.
During the first half, the
Administration lost points both
because unemployment rose and
because the inflation continued
with very little perceptible let
up. One can argue--and this
column has argued--that things
were bound to turn out that way
because of the situation that
prevailed at the beginning of the
game. The fact remains that
these are the figures on the
scoreboard at the end of the first
half.
The strategy was a relatively
simple one. Fiscal and mone
tary restraint were to be the
main tactical means of getting
inflation under control. How
ever, these were to be applied
only gradually. It was hoped
that this "gradualism* would
obviate any significant rise in
the unemployment rate. During
most of the first half the Ad
ministration made it plain that
it would not rely on razzle-
dazzle plays, like the wage-
price guideposts.
The Administration team got
some bad breaks, whose im
portance to the outcome in the
first half is not entirely clear.
The 1970 GM strike slowed the
economy down just when it was
beginning to show signs of some
recovery from the 1969-70
downturn--and just before elec
tion day. The corn blight may
have some effect on food prices
next year, although most ex
perts foresee no severe short
age.
We are not, at this point,
sure just how different the
strategy for the second half
will be. But at least the langu
age used to describe it
sounds a lot different. The key
word is no longer "restraint*
but "stimulation.*
But there is always a quali
fication attached to these sim
plified descriptions of the game
plan. In early 1969, in explana
tions of its plan for ending
inflation, the Administration
always stressed that its policy
of restraint would be applied
only gradually--so as to avoid a
serious rise in unemployment.
At present, in setting forth the
new policy of stimulation, Ad
ministration spokesmen usually
add that this policy wiU be
pursued with cautlon--as to
avoid restarting inflation.
The observer trying to in
terpret this is left wondering
how large a difference there
is between "gradual restraint"
and “cautious stimulation.*One
suspects that spokesmen mak
ing such statements are leaving
themselves a wide range of
choice in applying the new
strategy. And this is perfectly
proper. Good coaches try to
keep their options open.
Another aspect of the re
vised strategy is a change in
the attitude °f the Adminis
tration toward more direct at
tempts to influence prices and
wages. Specific wage-price
guideposts have not become
part of the game plan and don’t
seem about to be. But the Ad
ministration is beginning to
show less reluctance to inter
vene in specific situations on
an ad hoc basis. The President’s
reaction to the rise in
petroleum prices is an example
of this.
WeU, after listening to all
the discussions and analysis in
the between halves interval, how
do we think the game will turn
out in the second half?
We think that, on the whole,
it wiU turn out better for the
Administration than the first
half. They will begin to put
some points on the scoreboard,
both for reducing the rate of
inflation and, a little later, for
reducing unemployment.
Whether that kind of economic
score wiU be good enough to
win the game for the Ad
ministration we won’t know until
November, 1972.
However, we don’t believe
that any mid-game change in
strategy wiU have much to do
with this favorable turn. The
slow-down that has already oc
curred in the economy wiU begin
to hold back inflation to a more
noticeable degree in 1971. After
aU, unemployment was stiU at
the abnormally low level of
3.5% only a year ago in Dec
ember 1969. The development
of some slack in our economy
is stiU too recent to have a
pronounced effect on wage and
price trends, but we may expect
a noticeable impact next year.
The improvement in the un
employment rate wiU come
later, but before the present
game is over in 1972. This is
the normal cyclical succession
of events.
As for incomes policies
and plays of that type they may
produce some spectacular mo
ments on the field. They will
keep the audience turned in, but
they won’t gain much yardage.
We would expect that, at the
end of the game, both the un-
ployment rate and the Inflation
rate will be lower than they are
now. But it is doubtful that un
employment wiU be down to the
4% goal, or that prices wiU
have ceased to rise faster than
most people would like to see
them rise.
Many a first-rate coach has
been severely criticized, and
some have lost their jobs, for
events that were really beyond
their control. Sometimes the
coach started under condi
tions that made it almost hope
less for him to look good. A
President who takes office at
the height of an inflationary
boom Is in much the same
predicament.
The Wanderers’—1970
Where Space Starts
Although there is no exact
or recognized boundary,
many space scientists place
the beginning of space—as
far as the earth is con
cerned—at 60 miles above
the earth’s surface.
During the Depression of the
1930’s, Americans were ac
customed to the sight of hobos.
They camped along railroad
tracks, begged from door to
door, and sometimes were a
menace to householders. Today,
we have a new class of hobo.
We caH them "street people.*
They congregate in the vicinity
of colleges and universities and
are troublesome to respectable
communities.
Unlike the hobos of the past,
the * street people* of today are
likely to have money in their
pockets -- a check from Mom
and Dad or the welfare depart
ment Some of the "street
people,* the new wanderers,
have sizable, illegal Incomes
from the sale of marijuana,
LSD, speed and herion. They are
a key part of the new drug
culture.
No one can say how many of
these drop-outs from a working
society are to be found in the
country today. They may num
ber hundreds of thousands.
Some of them live in communes
in cities and rural areas. Others
inhabit campuses, though they
are non-students. They consti
tute a floating population full
of menace to our society.
The Columbia Broadcasting
System recently focused atten
tion on the menacing nature of
the "street people* in a spe
cial report on groups of them
who have drifted into Kansas
where marijuana grows wild in
great abundance. The "street
people* cut the marijuana at
night, when it is ready for har
vest, and peddle it to support
their life of indolence. The head
of the Kansas State Bureau of
SENSING THE NEWS
By Anthony Harrigan
IXICUTIVI VIC* MlSIO*NT
Southern States Industrial Council
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Parson Jones Says
...If Jesus
Came Today?
Dear Mr. Publisher:
My younguns are studying
the Sears and Rareback
Catelogue day and night in hopes
that St Nichelos will soon be
here. They read somewhere he
might not come to the cities
this year for fear he might
get mugged. Plus, there have
been rumors that his sleigh
might get bombed from two
directions. One group has got
it in for him cause he's got a
white beard and another can’t
stand his red suit
The more I think of it the
more I’m glad Jesus came when
he did. If He had to come
now-a-days there might be
some real troubles.
First off, with all this in
flation Mary and Joseph couldn’t
afford to stay in a motel. To
complicate matters, Joseph’s
carpenter union would probably
be on strike and he’d be broke.
They wouldn’t be able to stay
in a stable cause it would have
been condemned as sub
standard housing. When baby
Jesus did arrive the rich Wise-
men and the poor shepherds
would have been so polorized
that they’d either boycott the
meeting at Bethlehem or else
stage a riot when they got there.
And neither would have showed
up if the press hadn’t been
there. The chief of state, in
stead of killing all the babies,
would have put baby Jesus on
ADC (aid to dependant children.)
The Angels would have to check
with the musicians union before
they could sing. Not only that,
somebody might report’em as a
flying saucer.
What I’m really saying, Mr.
Publisher, is that in the year
of our Lord, 1970, things are
really messed up. If the world
ever needed a Savior, it’s now.
Greed, suspicion, hate, violence
are the labels on modern man.
It’s hard to understand how,
after 2,000 years of the Gospel,
we’re clawing at each others
throats. Maybe the Lord is let-
ing us sink in our own mire
til we’re up to our big mouth
and we have only one second
left to cry. Then maybe we’ll
cry out for his mercy and
guidance. Maybe, like the
prodigal son, we’ve got to go the
hogpen route before we come
to ourselves. I just hope we
don’t mess around and gag our
selves to death in the big cess
pool.
Well, I gotta be running along.
I hope and pray that God will
pull a miracle this Christmas
and melt the wax out of our
dirty ears-so’s we can hear
the heavenly music. Merry
Christmas!
Investigation reported that the
wanderers came into the state
from many parts of the Union.
They have teamed up with or
ganized crime groups on the
West Coast Helicopters are
used by organized criminal ele
ments to airUft the marijuana
harvested by the "street peo
ple.*
Some people excuse the wan
derers, saying that they are
"idealists.* But idealists don’t
peddle dope. Moreover, the
"street people’ aren't seeking
true isolation like some hermit
sects of the past. The "street
people* decline to cooperate
with conventional society. They
express hatred for the orderly
life. At the same time, they
also want to extract everything
possible from conventional so
ciety in the say of financial
assistance. They try to obtain
welfare payments and free
medical care.
The "street people* of the
1970’s deserve the label of pa
rasites. They want to live off
the host community of
employed, responsible citizens.
They talk about “love* and
“sharing,* but they want to take
from society and give nothing
in return. They aren’t utopian,
for they have no vision of a
better society. They merely
want to exploit the society in
which they Uve and take ad
vantage of its generosity and
tolerance.
History-minded citizens re
call that in times of
breakdown in civilizations there
is a turn toward nomadism.
Bands of ruffians inhabit unce
proud cities. We are witnessing
the same phenomenon in our own
time and country. In Atlanta,
Ga., for example, hippie "street
people* have made some streets
unsafe for respectable people.
On the West Coast, much of the
superb Pacific coast is deluged
with "street people*. BizarrC
crimes and disease are the re
sults of this flood of wanderers
who refuse to take up any du
ties In the society in which
they live..
Toleration of the wanderers
has been unduly extended. As
the 'street people’ spread their
drug culture and infect commu
nities -- quite literally -- with
physical disease, as well as the
diseases of the spirit, it is
becoming imperative that orga
nized society take steps to break
up the ruffian bands of wan
derers.
HopefuUy, the‘streetpeople’
will learn the error of their
ways. Practically speaking,
there isn’t much chance of this.
Therefore, society will have to
step in and deal firmly with
the wanderers. They will have to
be rehabitated by public autho
rities. They will have to be
educated anew in personal hy
giene and social attitudes.
The task will be difficult, but
it can be done. The nation can’t
afford to have hundreds of thou
sands of drifters turning to
drugs and street crime and re
jecting the very basis of an or
derly life.
Why Come You Got Brown Eyes This Year ??
Parson Jones