The Clinton chronicle. (Clinton, S.C.) 1901-current, October 22, 1970, Image 8
ts
V
I
I
CITY PROPERTY TAX
The city property tax increase ap
proved by Clinton City Council recent
ly is justified and probably overdue.
It’s Clinton’s first property tax in
crease in 20 years.
To hold the line on property tax
es, city officials have had to dip into
utility revenues. This has had its ef
fect on utility service in that revenues
weren’t able to keep facilities up to
date.
The day of reckoning has arriv
ed.
Last year, the city undertook a
modernization program for its electri
cal power and water systems. That,
too, was overdue.
Council recently approved a 17-
mill increase in city property taxes.
This is expected to bring in about
$92,600 in addtional revenue to the
city. The payment of interest on the
bonds for the utility system improve
ments requires about $38,000 and the
construction of a new power line to
the city’s substation will require ap
proximately $12,000. The city also
intends to purchase a new packer
truck for the street department at a
cost of approximately $16,000. The
new packer truck will pay for itself
in a relatively short time because of
the savings realized through increas
ed efficiency.
In addition to these necessary ex
penses, the city is faced with rising
costs of materials and services dur
ing an inflationary period.
To calculate what the increase
might mean to you, here’s a refresher
about tax mills.
There are ten mills to the penny.
The 17-mill increase actually is 1.7
cents on the dollar of assessed prop
erty valuation. If property is on
the tax books at $100 assessed prop
erty valuation, that would mean that
the city tax would be increased $1.70.
If it’s on the books at $1,000, the in
crease would be $17.
The increase makes the city prop
erty tax levy 70 mills. That means the
levy will be seven cents on the dollar
of assessed property valuation.
That way sound high but you
have to consider that assessed proper
ty valuation has little to do with ac
tual market value. The current prac
tice is for the property owner to nut
his own valuation on property for tax
purposes. Most valuations are ex
tremely low.
Even so, Clinton’s new property
tax levy will be well within reason
when compared with the levy in some
nearby towns. Laurens has a 94-mill
levy; Fountain Inn, 80 mills; Newber
ry, 60 mills; Whitmire, 60 mills; Pros
perity, 55 mills: Gray Court, 50 mills.
LAURENS HOSPITAL VOTE
In the November 3 General Elec
tion, Laurens County voters will cast
ballots on an amendment to the S.C.
Constitution to permit the Laurens
Hospital District to incur bonded in
debtedness not to exceed 36 per cent.
Although voters in the Bailey
Memorial Hospital District (Clinton-
Joanna area) will be eligible to vote
on this amendment, it will not affect
their taxes or their hospital district.
The amendment affects only the
LaurenS~ Hospital District (School
arid Cross Hill) which will
be taxed for the cost.
The indebtedness increase is
needed in the Laurens Hospital Dis
trict to handle financing of a $1.4 mil
lion addition to Laurens District Hos
pital in Laurens. It is to be built in
two phases over the next 15 to 18
months. The proposal actually would
require a bond indebtedness equal to
only 11 per cent of the assessed valua
tion of property in the district. How
ever, the amendment raising the limit
to 35 per cent would make available
the issuance of bonds if and when
there is ever a need for additional
money. Not one cent of bonded in
debtedness could be made beyond the
11 percent without another referen
dum. A constitutional Amendment
can be made only every two years
while a referendum can be called at
any time.
By getting approval of an indebt
edness increase of 35 per cent in the
Constitutional Amendment, the dis
trict would be prepared, for example,
to get quick referendum approval for
matching funds if Federal funds sud
denly became available for a project
needed by the district.
A 11 h o u g h the Clinton-Joanna
area is not directly affected, Laurens
Hospital District officials are encour
aging support from this part of the
county because the amendment must
be voted on countywide.
How Long?
A child asks: “Where is daddy?”
A wife asks, “Is my husband alive or
dead?”
Communist North Vietnam is sa
distically practicing spiritual and
mental genocide on over 1,500 Ameri
can prisoners of war and their fam
ilies.
How long?
Funding The Extremes
HOUSTON, TEXAS - Con
cerned churchmen are deeply
troubled by the use of church
funds to finance revolutionary
organizations and the role of
some clerics as apologists for
hate groups which engage in
violence.
This profoundly disturbing
development is the subject of
public attention here this week
as the Episcopal Church holds
its national convention in this
Southwestern metropolis. Many
concerned members of this
Protestant denomination be
lieve that the church’s General
Convention Special Program
has been improperly used to
fund violent groups.
Evidence supporting the po
sition of the concerned church
men came on the eve of the
convention when the Executive
Council of the Episcopal Church
granted $25,00 to the Black
Awareness Coordinating Com
mittee (BACC) in South Caro
lina over the strenuous ob
jections of Bishops Gray Tem
ple and John Pinckney of that
state. Bishop Temple told the
Executive Council that one of
the BACC leaders was among
militants who drew two-year
prison sentences for their part
in a gunpoint takeover of Vor-
hees College--an Episcopal in
stitution in South Carolina.
The protests by Bishops
Temple and Pinckney were of no
avail in the Executive Council,
however. The reason may be
that Bishop John E. Hines,
presiding Bishop of the na
tional church, doesn’t agree
with the established accepted
concept of violence.
In a provocative statement
quoted in the HOUSTON
CHRONICLE, Bishop Hines
said the Episcopal Church may
have to formulate a new de
finition and concept of violence.
He declared, in a comment
strangely similar to New Left
pronouncements, that ‘the na
ture of violence emerges not
simply as acts of violences by
individuals or groups, but by
a pattern of long-entrenched
institutionalized violence.*
Bishop Hines’ remarks are
of concern to all Americans,
not simply members of his de
nomination, for his words con
stitute an apology for violent
individuals and groups, and
condemnation of American
society.
If Bishop Hines doesn’t
understand or accept the es
tablished concept of violence,
he must be closing his eyes to
the grim realities of our
county today.
The United States hasn’t any
need for a new definition of
violence. The meaning of vio
lence is very clear from events.
Violence is the destruction of
the mathematics center at the
University of Wisconsin by
radical fanatics and the death of
a 30-year-old researcher and
father of three children. Vio
lence is the pattern of assolts
and assinetion attempts on
poHrimen violence is mur
der, arson and rioting by mobs
hi the Mg cities of the nation,
violence is the wave of bomb
“Weathermen* re-
Thoughtful citizens cannot a-
gree with Bishop Hines that
there is “long-entrenched in
stitutionalized violence* in the
American svstem. This is the
country whose courts have gone
to an extreme in defending the
rights of individuals as against
the rights of society. A-
mericans believe in justice—
and in the law and order that
make justice possible.
If any “institutionalized vio
lence* is to be found anywhere
in America, it must be in the
Tax-exempt organizations that
supply rm.aey to revolutionary
groups. For example, radical
clerics who channel church
funds to militants can be said
to be institutionalizing vio
lence. That is something that
undoubtedly will be considered
by the delegates at Houston.
One cannot be a Christian and
believe in social change by
means of Molotov cocktails and
sniper attacks on policemen.
Religion isn’t served by fanning
hatred of a lawful, orderly
society.
Tragically, some radical
churchmen are determined to
aid extremist elements. For
instance, convention officials
decided to pay the expenses
incurred here by a group from
the socalled ‘Submarine
Church,* a California-based
fringe group. This hippie group
attended the annual Presbyter
ian Assembly and shouted four-
letter words at the delegates.
Many churchmen, In a num
ber of denominations, have been
unaware of the funding of ex
tremists. Once they become
aware--and the Houston con
vention is producing dis
closures important to all de
nominations - the ordinary
church members are likely to
cut off funds for un-Christian
and un-American programs de
vised by small cliques of
radical clerics.
It is reasonable to conclude
that ‘the man in the pew* will
not put money in the collec
tion plate if it is going to groups
similar to the Black Panthers.
Changes
At Colleges
Dear Mr. Publisher:
ttfador bv *
Somebody told me one time
that change is a sign of life.
If that’s true, the colleges and
universities of today are bud
ding like spring-time. When I
was a boy the purpose of a
college was to help you get a
job. There was work over on
the other side of them school
hills. After a while the school
image changed and parents sent
their younguns to college so’s
they wouldn’t have to work like
they did. It was to teach ’em to
suceed without working. Then
Vietnam came along and college
became the place to beat the
draft You could go to college
and be away from all the vio
lence and the killing.
Before long came another
change - the college became
a battleground. It’s safer In
Vietnam than it is on some
college campuses. Pretty soon
the fearful ones who went to
college to stay out of Vietnam,
will have to go to Vietnam to
stay out of college.
Like I say, Mr. Publisher,
if that ain’t change, I don’t know
what is. I wonder what the next
gimmlc will be? Will colleges
become the .palaces that rule
the revolution? Will they be
come homes for delinquent
children? Will they be replaced
by something else - say like
mental service stations on
every corner? I for one con
fess to being confused by the
hole thing.
The direction in today’s edu
cation seems to be to let the
student learn what he wants
to. That being the case, I don’t
see why they need to go to
an institution to do that
The Good Book says we
should ‘train a child in the
ways he should go*. I reckon
that means that some things
are worth passing along to the
next generation. But it seems
that we have grave doubts a-
bout what we’ve got to pass a-
long. Peter Marshall once said
that a fella who dicbi’t stand for
something would fall for any
thing. It looks like we’ve reach
ed that point.
Mr. Publisher, it’s a good
thing somebody made me study
arithmetic, cause I would have
never dene it on my own. At
least, now I can count my change
to see whether I got cheated
or not. And fortunately, some
body taught me the Ten Com
mandments so’s I can tell
whether I’m cheating or not
I gotta run now. Maybe that’s
the answer!
Parson Jones
* * *
2-B—THE CHRONICLE, Clinton, S. C., Oct. 22, 1970
Look
■' Lpr r&H;
eview
Future Shock
By Lennart Pearson
Head Librarian
Presbyterian College
FUTURE SHOCK. By Alvin Toffler. 506 pages.
Random House. 1970.
If you have the feeling that the future is ar
riving too fast and that its arrival is not very
well-coordinated, you may be suffering form “fu
ture shock.” This condition of stress and dis
orientation is what happens when people are sul>-
jected to too much change in too short a time.
Alvin Toffler, formerly an editor of Fortune
now turned “sociologist of the future”, says that
he became fascinated with the concept of future
shock in 1965 and has been pursuing it ever since.
According to his observations, “future shock is
no longer a distantly potential danger but a real
sickness from which increasingly large numbers
already suffer.” That is why he has been read
ing up on the problems of change, interviewing
experts, visiting research centers, interviewing
ties, and trying in all sorts of ways to discover
what is happening to us—all of us.
Toffler shows how the old roots of religion,
nation, community, family, and profession, are
being tom up by “the hurricane impact” of an
all-embracing accelerative thrust. Confronted by
such a situation, an individual is compelled to an
chor himself in new ways, which he can do only
as he understantds how the facts of transcience,
novelty, and diversity, affect his personal life.
He goes on to describe our “throw-away so
ciety”—its moular men and organizational “ad
hocracies”, its life-styles and subcults, its frac
tured families and informational overloads—all
in well - researched journalese reminiscent of
Vance Packard. Are we going to make it ? May
be. But it will require of us a significant im
provement in our sense of social responsibility,
a revolution in our understanding of the educa
tional task, and a mastery of a galloping technol-
oy which if left uncontrolled will eventually drive
us all mad.
Toffler’s book is an important one. particu
larly so because (as he points out) so little is
really known about the processes of adaptivity,
especially by those who call for change, or by
those who are supposedly preparing us for what
ever brave new world awaits us. His observa
tions are extensive and penetrating, and those
w’ho like to appeal to things like “the enduring
values of the past.” “the unchanging elements in
human nature.” and “the lessons of history” will
find themselves challenged to come up with an
answer. This is a new contribution to the old
discussion about “humanistic” vs. “scientific”
values—this time from the viewpoint of a social
scientist groping toward a fusion of the two cul
tures as the key to a better quality of life.
Future Shock is especially recommended to
those who understand the importance of asking
the right questions.
T—!*
Albert Watson
To The Editor:
In listening to the various
discussions concerning the
current gubernatorial race,
I’ve been struck by the claims
of all candidates to be the man
of the people. However, one
candidate is far too liberal to
be acceptable to the people of
South Carolina. Another is so
reactionary that he cannot be
seriously considered.
The Democratic guber
natorial candidate is just ano
ther in a long line of errand
boys for the big money interests
of the state. In the usual way
of being carried along by the
big money boys, John West has
been chosen to be their next
flunky in the State house follow
ing an apprenticeship as LL
Governor.
This leaves only AlbertWat-
son as the true man of the
people. Watson, in 1964, as a
Democrat, instead of listening
to the dictates of his party
followed his conscience and the
will of the people of South Caro
lina in supporting Barry Gold-
water for the presidency. For
this action Watson was punished
by the Decmocrats through the
removal of his seniority. Fol
lowing this action, Watson de
cided to become a Republican.
But instead of just switching
parties, he decided to bring his
case to the people. He resign
ed his seat in the House of
Representatives and ran in the
special election which was then
cafied vindicating his decision
when the people of South Caro
lina sent him back to Congress.
This courageous action demon
strates Albert Watson to be the
true candidate of people in this
election.
Sincerely,
Elmer W. Hatcher, Jr.
P. O. Box 501
Presbyterian College
Democratic Rule
To The Editor:
This year with the candidacy
of Albert Watson we have the
chance to end one hundred years
of Democratic rule. During this
period, the Democrats have
brought this state to the bot
tom of the ladder in education,
teacher pay, medical services,
and other important areas.
While these problems have been
developing, the Democratic
government has bought the only
jet for the personal use of the
governor. Now they are pre
sently constructing a million
dollar underground parking lot
in Columbia. We need to end
this gross misuse of our tax
dollars when so many other
projects need this money much
more. If we are to accomplish
this, we cannot allow the De
mocrats to hold the state house
for another four years.
Sincerely,
Sandy Haskell
P. O. Box 493
Presbyterian College
Indians on reservations, who
now represent about two-thirds
of the more than 650,000 Ameri
can Indians, are the country’s
most disadvantaged minority
graft,* These.people have an
extremely high unemployment
rate and an average animal in
come of less than $2,000. Some
Indians on reservations earn as
little as $500 a year.