The Clinton chronicle. (Clinton, S.C.) 1901-current, May 21, 1970, Image 10
«
»
*
KNOW THE CANDIDATES
The La ureal) County Democratic
'Party last week announced its ached-
fcule of five stump speakings prior to
the June 9 primary-
We hope you will take advantage
.of at least one opportunity to see and
• hear the candidates for the offices
which are vitally important to the
progress and well-being of our county.
The two key races in the primary are
for the two seats in the S.C. House of
Representatives and for the five posts
on County Council. There are three
candidates for the two House seats
and 12 candidates for the five County
Council positions.
The “stump speakings” will be
your opportunity to see, hear and talk
to those candidates and it could help
you to make a more knowledgeable
selection. We think it’s a sin against
Democracy to be so apathetic that you
don’t bother to vote. It’s almost as
bad to vote without taking the time to
study the issues or the candidates.
As a reminder of the “stump
speaking schedule, we reprint it here:
Friday, May 29—Hickory Tavern
school.
Monday, June 1—Joanna School.
Thursday, June 2 — Gray Court
High School.
Friday, June 5 — Clinton Mill Ball
Park.
Monday, June 8—Ford High School
in Wattsville.
All of the programs will start at
8 p.m.
IDEALS OF AN AMERICAN
Russell and Margaret Metz, pub
lishers of the Bath County (Ken
tucky) News-Outlook came across an
address delivered by 18-year-old Eric
Fredrickson at a Junior Achievement
banquet, and thought it worthy of a
banner-headline feature. The excerpts,
which follow, speak highly of the
youth affiliated with Junior Achieve
ment.
“Now 1 am only 18 years old and
there are still a great many things
about the world that I don’t under
stand but there are a few simple truths
I am sure of; and these truths I will
keep with me the rest of my life. It is
these ideals which I think make it im
portant to be an American . . .
“THIS I BELIEVE; It was the
idea of free enterprise conducted free
ly and without undue hindrance which
made it possible for this country to
get ahead through individual imag
ination, intelligence and industry.
“THIS I BELIEVE: That America
grew into the great country it is to
day through positive constructive ac
tion by all people in the society . . .
“THIS I BELIEVE: America is a
nation for all people who want to be
involved and work hard to make de
mocracy work . . . who want to make
their own lives better and this nation
greater by the sweat of their brows
• • •
“THIS I BELIEVE: American
business has played a vital role in
helping this country forge ahead and
that American business will continue
to carry on its great tradition and take
Vi ever greater role keeping the
American society strong . . .
“THIS I BELIEVE: America will
remain a great nation as long as her
people do not forget that the ideals of
dignity, honor, pride of accomplish
ment and respect for one’s fellow man
are for all times and all ages . . .
THIS I BELIEVE: It is not shame
ful to love one’s country, to be proud of
one’s heritage, to stand up for those
very values which have made and still
make this country strong.”
NEEDED; CHARACTER REFORM
These days we are assailed on ev
ery side by calls for “reform”—Postal
Reform, Drug Reform, Social Reform,
Tax Reform, and dozen of others. But
> one of our compatriots, newspaper
•"writer i and eohimnist Brian Bex, sug
gested in a recent address reported in
the Bloomington, Indiana STAR COU
RIER that what we need more than
all else is a bit of “character reform.”
“We mass produce everything in
this country,” Mr. Bex told his audi
ence; "everything but character.”
“It used to be,” he continued, “that
when you wanted somet’.ing, you
worked to earn it. Now you stage a
riot and get it given to you at some
one else’s expense.
“If your father or grandfather lost
his job, he took whatever work he
could get. Now hordes of relief ‘cli
ents’ refuse a job unless it is to their
liking, and they demand the job to be
brought to them.
“This nation was built by immi
grants who struggled here for oppor
tunity, and would have scorned the
false idea of ‘something for nothing.’
Now it seems to be an almost univer
sal ambition.
“It used to take a lifetime of gruel
ling work and scrimping for a family
or a country to earn a little surplus, a
taste of security. Now mobs of so-
called ‘students’ and whole ‘emerging
nations’ demand they be given it, out
of your earnings with no effort on
their part.”
“Have you ever wondered wbat
happened to the America of yester
day?”
Brian Bex offered some positive
suggestions. Although many people
seem to 'believe that they can do little
or nothing, Mr. Bex insisted that
“what each person is capable of do
ing, and has the ability to do, is sub
stantial.” Further, he said, the phil
osophy of the left (in all its shadings,
from Communism to the welfare state)
can be successfully fought by a posi
tive philosophy of freedom. “Ideas
must be fought with other ideas, not
emotions. It is not enough to know
.wbat one believes in; it is equally im
portant to know why one holds certain
convictions.”
We agree with Mr. Bex. Know
what you believe. Know why. Ac
cept responsibility. Stand on your
own two feet and be counted. That’s
the way a free and open society works.
It’s called Americanism.
Bitter
Plans for a Bette*.Society?
2-B—THE CHRONICLE, Clinton, S. C„ May 21, 1970
UNITED STATES SENATOR
‘Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner’
Kent State Riot
BY THURMAN SENSING
Executive Vice President
Southern States Industrial
Council
Leftists and liberals in the
United States and around the
world already are trying, to
portray the slain students at
Kent State University in Ohio
as heroic workers for peace,
whereas in fact they were part
of an ugly and brutal mob en
gaged in transforming a uni
versity into a scene of anarchy
and bloodshed. The deaths were
tragic, yes, but understandable-
violence begets tragedy.
Had the National Guardsmen
failed to defend themselves,
they might have been stoned to
death. One can be sure that the
leftists and the liberals wouldn’t
have shed any tears for dead
Guardsmen — no more than they
weep for the many policemen
who have died in the line of
duty, defending communities a-
gainst anti-war demonstrators
and other political hoodlums.
Glorification of the four dead
protesters -- members of the
campus mob --is not without
design. Radical elements seek
an opportunity to marshal opin
ion against Guardsmen, police
men, and regular soldiers. The
objective of the radicals is to
force disarmament of troops
and police forces, even as in
the propaganda treatment of the
My Lai incident in Vietnam they
seek to discredit and undermine
the morale and combat effec
tiveness of American troops in
Southeast Asia.
If the leftists and liberals
succeed in disarming the
Guardsmen, if they manage to
shift the blame to those who
were protecting law and order,
then the forces of revolution
will have scored a tremendous
victory. For the safety of the
country, it is imperative that
the American people stand be
hind the Guardsmen, in Ohio
and in the other 49 states. They
are the people’s shield against
the revolutionists in our midst
Bloody insurrection by revo
lutionary elements seems much
nearer than anyone expected a
year or so ago. The involve
ment of several thousand stu
dents at Yale University in
protests against the trial of
Black Panthers accused of mur
der and khteaping, shows how
fer the country has gone towards
mindless chaos sought by
those who hate Ok Utaited Sta
tes and seek its destruction
from within. At Yale, almost an
entire adversity went beserk,
with faculty members and even
Ok President of Ok institution
feeding prestige to the Panther
cause — a display of academic
irrationality unprecedented in
that threatens the survival of
our free country.
As Vice President Spiro T.
Agnew said in a recent address
in Florida, the problem of the
disturbed universities is not for
the Philosophy Department or
the English Department, but
the Justice Department. It may
take scores of additional U.S.
attorneys and hundreds of ex
tra FBI agents, but no effort
should be spared in apprehend
ing and prosecuting those who
have engaged in criminal left
ist activities on college and
university campuses in recent
weeks. The possibility of mass
sedition trials should be se
riously considered, for that is
the condition the country now
faces.
The first target of govern
mental action should be the rio
ters who attacked the National
guardsmen at Kent State Uni
versity. They and others like
them should be the subject of
legal action. In college after
college, the need is to locate
and root out the radicals,
whether in the student body or
on the faculty. It may be that
the states and the federal go
vernment will have to enact
new laws to accomplish that
purpose. If need be, the states
should call special sessions of
their legislatures to get the
laws necessary to keep the
peace and protect decent prople
against the political hippies who
believe they can burn public
buildings, loot stores, and bom
bard police and Guardsmen with
rocks and other missiles.
* * *
Your son and daughter—in
three weeks time they'll be
home from school and you
will have to listen. You’ll be
pleasantly surprised. They’re
clean, they’re dedicated,
they're not bums and they’re
worried about the future of
this country. So am I. I have
backed both President Nix
on’s and President Johnson’s
war policy. I have done this
even though I disagreed with
Johnson's policy of “too little
and too late’’ and Nixon’s
“surrender on the installment
plan.’’ When Nixon took of
fice much the same situation
existed as when Eisenhower
took office in January 1953. I
thought that President Nixon,
like Eisenhower, would step
up the battle and bring this
war to a close However, the
President last May stated we
no longer seek military vic-
tory. In June he announced
his withdrawal policy. And in
September he said he would
accept, from elections, a Com
munist form of government.
The withdrawal policy was
cited successful by the Presi
dent and he accelerated it the
week before Cambodia. Con
gress in the meantime had
passed a resolution requiring
the President to consult the
Congress in any future for
eign involvement. One resolu
tion specifically prohibited
ground force activity in Laos
and Thailand, leaving out
Cambodia only because the
President said it was a sanc
tuary. The President ac
knowledged the role of Con
gress. But the fact is that our
government consulted for
weeks with the South Vietna
mese government over the
Cambodian operation but did
not consult with a single
member of our own Congress.
For years I have insisted
that the right of petition con
templated petitioning within
the halls of government
rather than in the streets of
America that our republic
consisting of checks and bal
ances was deliberate, was rep
resentative. the people could
be heard, that change could
be had—that our policies pur
sued the majority will. The
responsibiilty for war or
peace rests with the Congress.
And when the Commander in
Chief leads the people and
the Congress to believe that
involvement is on the de-
mmmmma
crease, that disengagement
and withdrawal is the policy,
his sudden switch into Cam
bodia without consulting Con
gress amounts to a surprise
attack on the basic tenets of
representative government.
The people ask, “Did you ad
vise this course?” The answer
is no. They next ask, Then
how can you say that the ac
tions of our government arc
representative?” The mili
tants have been trying to tear
down respect for government
for years. Now unless we act,
the responsible citizen is left
defenseless. And it is just as
necessary now to defend gov
ernment and responsible citi
zenry here at home es it is
to defend our soldiers from
Cambodian sanctuaries. In
acting, foremost in my mind
are seven years of war; with
42,000 killed, 200,000 casual
ties and $100 billion expend
ed. I cannot justify “opera
tion meatgrinder” for another
seven years. I cannot justify
continuing to preserve and
protect the enemy sanctuary,
North Vietnam, while invad
ing sanctuaries in a third and
neutral country. I cannot ad
vocate continuing in Cambo
dia while the President is
presently leading us out. He
says he doesn’t want to be in
after July 1. Therefore I will
support legislation that would
require the President to con
sult Congress before resum
ing military action in Cam
bodia after July 1. I realize
the President’s aim in Cam
bodia was good From all re
ports at this moment it has
been successful. But the test
is not success or failure in
Cambodia. The test is success
here at home. There is no use
firing the gun no matter
how well aimed if the recoil
is going to kill the gun crew.
Nixon just about wiped out
the crew. We must act imme
diately to restore the people's
confidence. This is w'hat con
cerns the majority of stu
dents They have been fight
ing the militants and campus
radicals. They have been op
posing the burnings and cam
pus takeovers. Their argu
ment has been for the system
and working within the sys
tem. Pretident Nixon serious
ly damaged this argument
with Cambodia and now we
stand to alienate a whole gen
eration of future leadership
in this country.
SENATOR STROM
THURMOND
REPORTS TO THE
PEOPLE
W<
SUCCESS IN CAMBODIA
Let's Work Together
Obrioosly tke time fer bold
at Lav tad order is
The nob attack an Ok
at
t ri
ot paratestea-
hood-
Events in Cambodia have
borne out the correctness of
President Nixon’s brave and
courageous action in ordering
the destruction of North Viet
nam sanctuaries in the border
areas.
For the first time in four or
five years, Cambodian soldiers
have been able to enter freely
the territory known as “The
Parrot’s Beak,” and other areas
occupied until recently by North
Vietnamese forces. This is a
startling confirmation that the
action by U. S. and South Viet
namese troops has succeeded in
restoring Cambodian sovereign
ty over areas that had been
under alien occupation.
NO EXTENSION OF WAR
This development gives the lie
to those who claim that Cam
bodia’s so-called “neutrality”
was violated by the President’s
decision, or who claim that the
destruction of the sanctuaries
was an “extension of the war.”
The real truth is that the
CanbodiaM lost their sover
eignly in 1965 and 1966 when
the playboy Prince Sihanouk
tacitly began to surrender these
areas to the North Vietnamese
Communists. A neutral nation
has an obligation to maintain
Ha neotralKy, and not to allow
Ha territory to be nsed by com
batants of either side. When any
nation allows Ha neutrality to
be violated by one party, the
other party, under international
law. has the right to take what
ever steps are accessary against
the offending party.
Clearly, the action taken by
President Nixon should have
been taken about five years ago
by the previous Administration,
when the military field of action
was extended to Cambodia by
the North Vietnamese. Civilian
critics, who have no experience
of military tactics and strategy,
tend to think of a war in terms
of the place of battle alone.
ACT OP WAR
It is wall known by those who
have had experience in battle
that military supply,
ten
any nOitaxy
tabtishment of
Th» tteM has com tor fe-
tSdlteteoit cSSteMhii
ktetf ■QMtoalfhKteteaaril
of
The es-
centers is
ton, mof the UA, brought the
war into Cambodia long ago,
and it is folly to speak of the
present action as a so-called
“extension of the war.”
The destruction of these sanc
tuaries is an essential part of
President Nixon’s withdrawal of
American troops from Vietnam.
Again, every military command
er knows that withdrawal ac
tions are frequently the most
dangerous operations in war.
Every withdrawal must be
covered on the flanks to prevent
the destruction of life by hit-
and-run enemy attacks. Because
of the geography of Vietnam,
the enemy sanctuaries in Cam
bodia are ideally located for hit-
and-run and clandestine supply
actions.
The success of President Nix
on’s Vietnamization program
has forced enemy troops back
into the sanctuaries. But the
withdrawal of American forces
would clearly tempt the enemy
to strike again. We must give
Vietnamization a chance.
DISTORTION
It is unfortunate that those
who have been working for a
military victory by the North
Vietnamese have inflamed some
segments of public opinion in
the United States against the
President’s action. It is easy to
distort the purpose of military
operations when most people
are remote from the real condi
tions of battle, and have little
experience in the military art.
War could not be successfully
waged when the previous Com-
mander-in-Chief placed political
guidelines above victory. We
learned from the Korean war
that Red China intervened only
after the U. S. had mssnred then
of a sanctuary north of the Yalu
River. Similarly, the North Viet
namese have been able to pro
long the war because of their
protected sanctuaries in Cam
bodia. President Nixon is to be
congratulated for having the
courage to reverse this tragic
mistake in U. S. policy.
It is now time for the Ameri
can people to dose ranks behind
our President. He needs our
support in these operations
which are necessary to bring our
fighting men home safely. Those
who persist in unreasoned criti-
dsm are doing a disservice to
Dear Mr. Editor,
Since I was graduated from
Clinton High in 1966, the social
and political conditions of the
United States have changed
drastically. According to the
news reports at various times,
the only end to all of this tur
moil is self-destruction. At
least this seems to be the opin
ion of most of the elder part
of the generation gap. Now don’t
take me wrong please, this is
actually a letter of appeal to
everyone to just sit down and
look around at what is happening
and try to determine the motives
behind all of these actions, and
then do something about it
Of course, it is terrible that
young men and women die on
college campuses as the result
of demonstrations. But do the
citizens actually realize how
many young men die every day
in Southeast A sia? Sure V ietnam
is a long way from home, bat
as a lot of people in Clinton
know, the casualties of Vietnam
strike right in the center of
a lot of homes.
It is past time that the people
of the world realize that every
one must work together to end
all of this strife. And just be
cause you people live in one
of the fine small cities of the
nation, you think you can get
up every morning and go to work
only to return home and sit
your passive body in front of
the television every evening.
Many of you think, “The world
will take care of itself, and any
way, what will any one care if
I, one small person In this large
nation, did nothing?’ *1 am no
one,’ you say, "What good win
it do if I write a letter, and
what harm will happen If I
don’t?’
here and have come into con
tact with many young men, I
have reached many decisions
that I hope will prove import
ant in the future, ti will be but
a few years till I will be part of
the older generation, and it will
be too late to act then.
In closing, I am curious to see
the result of the voting on in
creasing the appropriations for
the schools of District 56. The
only way to change anything is
through education. There should
not be a single vote of ’no’
in the balloting, and there should
be 100% participation. Now Just
how many of you did not go to
the polls or worse yet, how many
of you did not take the time to
register? If you did not vote,
you have absolutely no right to
express your approval or dis
approval of the result of the vot
ing.
What do you think would hap
pen if one day no one voted?
Sure it might not hurt today,
but for the future of mankind,
think of tomorrow!
I want to thank you for your
time.
SP/4 Steven C. Wright
249-82-6489
E/122d Maint. Bn.
APO New York, N. Y. 09165
Before I came to Germany,
I too was a passive person.
the br.ve m.n7lWi”Sd iUi ^ l °. "** ,*y**’ 1 ^
who have fought to preserve our comforts of home and a won-
dertel family to ocavy my time.
So frankly, I didn’t think my act
ions would help change anything
either. But since I have been
•r printed at ptrmmnt
Let all things be done... in
order.—(I Cor. 14:40).
When we believe that there
is an orderly plan for us, and
we let that plan unfold in us
through prayer, we come into
a consciousness of a new world
of thought and action. The
same divine wisdom that keeps
the planets in their orbits is in
us. Let us aftrm that God’s
plan of orde? tn our life is un
folding, and manifesting itself
in perfect ways.