Historical Newspapers of South Carolina

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

( THE CHRONICLE, Clinton, S. C., December 12, 196»—!1 Legal Notices SUMMONS STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COUNTY OF JLAURENS. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Altha B. Hartzog, Lola B. Nichols, Franklin D. Bostic, Wil liam B. Bostic, Lawrence C. Bos tic, Julian L. Bostic, Jr., Al fred P. Bostic, Nellie B. Por.g, SaUle B. Moss, Edward L. Bos tic, and Ethel B. Broom, Plain tiffs, versus James M. Bostic, Jr., Luther J. Bostic, Van Yar borough, Ellen Bostic Finley, Lila Bostic Quinn, Elaine Bostic Holland, Waymon Bostic, Mary Bostic Wicker, Sara Bostic Campbell, Doris Anderson Bos tic, Lucy Osborne Thomas, Wal ker Osborne, Daniel Osborne, Earl Osborne, Woodrow Osborne, R. Aubrey Harley, James N. Parr, Adults; Frances Irene Bos tic, Johnny Leroy Bostic, Edith Steele, Bryce Steele, Rhonda Steele, Patricia Steele, James Steele, Rita Steele, Tommy Steele, and Vincent Eugene Steele, minors; also, any other persons unknown claiming any right, title, interest, or lien in or over the premises described in the Complaint 1 in this action; any adults under legal disability or any minors being designated as a class as “John Doe”, Defend ants. TO THE DEFENDANTS A- BOVE NAMED: YOU ARE HEREBY SUM MONED AND required to answer the Complaint in this action of which a copy is herewith served upon you, serve copy of your An swer to the said Complaint on the subscriber at his office, Lau rens, South Carolina, within twenty days after the service hereof, exclusive of the day ol such service and if you fail to answer the Complaint herein within the date aforesaid, the Plaintiffs in this action will apply to the Court for relief demanded in the said Complaint. W. PAUL CULBERTSON Plaintiffs’ Attorney Laurens, S. C. March 4, 1968 TO any and all unknown in- fknt Defendants or other persons under a legal disability having or claiming to have an interest in the land described in the Com plaint in the above entitled act ion herein being as a class de signated as “John Doe”, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Elisabetn m. may, Lau rens, South Carolina, has been appointed as Guardian Ad Litem for any unknown persons who are necessary parties hereto for the purpose of the above entitled act ion and that the said appoint ment shall become absolute on the twenty-first day after the service of this Notice upon you should you fail to apply for the appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem during the said time and that an Order Nisi of the Court of Common Pleas for Laurens County, S. C., is filed with the Clerk of Court for the said Coun ty. W. PAUL CULBERTSON Plaintiffs’ Attorney Laurens, S. C. March 4, 1968 NOTICE TO THE DEFENDANTS A- BOVE NAMED: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: That the original Complaint in this action, together with a Sum mons of which the foregoing is a copy, was filed in the office of the Clerk of Court for Lau rens County, South Carolina, at the Courthouse in the City of Laurens, South Carolina, on the day of Laurens, S. C. March 4, 1968 LIS PENDENS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an action has been com menced and is pending in this Court upon a Complaint of the above named Plaintiffs against the above named Defendants for the purpose of ordering the sale of the tract of land hereinafter described and providing for the disposition of the proceeds of the sale. The said tract of land be ing described as follows: “All that piece, parcel, and lot of land lying and being in Jacks Township No. 6, about four miles from the City Limits of Whit mire, South Carolina, lying on the North side of the Whitmire- Clinton Highway (known as the Calhoun Highway), and containing three and eight-tenths (3.8) acres, more or less, being known and designated as Lot No. 3 on a plat prepared by J. S. - J. R. Crawford, dated August 1, 1953, and recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 105, in the office of the Clerk of Court for Laurens Coun ty. This being the identical lot conveyed to L. C. Bostic by deed of Mary Ann Murphy, October 19, 1953, and recorded in Deed Book 110, Page 297, in the office of the Clerk of Court for Laurens County. For a more detailed de scription of the said lot, see the above cited plat and deed which are incorporated herein by re ference.” W. PAUL CULBERTSON Plaintiffs’ Attorney Laurens, S. C. March 4, 1968 D5-3c-D19 * * * CREDITOR’S NOTICE All persons having claims a- gainst the estate of Robert L. Blease, deceased, are hereby notified to file the same duly verified, with the undersigned, and those indebted to said estate will please make payment like wise. Helen R. Blease Route *2 Clinton, S. C. Executrix November 25, 1968 D5-3c-D19 * * * CREDITOR’S NOTICE All persons having claims a- jainst the estate of Elmer C. Bennett, deceased, are hereby notified to file the same duly verified, with the undersigned, and those indebted to said es tate will please make payment likewise. Ruby M. Bennett Executrix November 29th, 1968 D5-3c-D19 * * * FINAL SETTLEMENT Take notice that on the 6th day of January, 1969 I will ren der a final account of my acts and doings as Executor of the estate of Harrison A. Copeland in the office of the Judge of Pro bate of Laurens County, at 10 o’clock A.M., and on the same day will apply for a final discharge from my trust as Executor. Any person indebted to said estate is notified and required to make payment on or before that date, and all persons having claims against said estate will present them on or before said W. PAUL CULBERTSON Plaintiffs’ Attorney Consult about this question: "Christmas shopping, to a merchant, means a fully stocked store and extra risks. Does the Bailey Agency provide a free survey of my Insurance to . . theft . . Interruption .. fidelity ity for Juries?" BAILEY AGENCY M. S. Bailey & Son, Bankers, Build lag Dial Day 833-0681 — Night and Sunday 833-0323 date, duly proven or be forever barred. Marion Mayfield Copeland Executor, 703 N. Broad St Clinton, S.C. Nov. 19. 1968 N21-4c-DI2 * * * SUMMONS Willie James Thompson, Plaintiff, versus Shirley Smiley Thompson, Defendant. TO THE DEFENDii ABOVE NAMED: YOU ARE HEREBY SUM MONED and required to answer the complaint in this action, of which a copy is herewith served upon you, and to serve a copy of your answer to said com plaint on the subscriber at his office, 203 West Pitts Street, Cllhton, South Carolina 29325 within twenty days after the ser vice hereof, exclusive of the day of such service; and if you fail to answer the complaint within the time aforesaid, the plaintiff in this action will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Tench P. Owens Attorney for the Plaintiff November 26, 1968 NOTICE TO THE ABOVE NAMED DE FENDANT, Shirley Smiley Thompson: TAKE NOTICE that the complaint in the above en titled action, together with the summons of which the foregoing is a copy, was filed in the office of the tiers oi court tor Lau rens County, South C^||ma on the 2nd day of De<ffWBPl968. Tench P. Owens Attorney for the Plaintiff December 9, 1968 D12-3c-D26 Robon Creek Referendum Set Ian. 7 The Laurens and Greenville Soil and Water Conservation Dis trict Supervisors held a Public Hearing on Tuesday, November 26, on the creation of the Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation District, pursuant to provisions of the watershed act of the Gen eral Assembly of South Caro lina 1967. The hearing was held at the Hillcrgst High School on U.S. 276 n^ar the Greenville- Laurens County line and was fa vorable in everv respect. At the meeting uie supervisors set the date for the referendum oo the erealioa of the Water shed district for Tuesday, Jaa- na?* 7, 1969. Polling places fet the Laurens Coaaty area will be at Hickory Tavera ikdGray Court AH qualified electors of the wa tershed district shall be eligible to vote in the referendum. “The district supervisors shall have complete charge of the referen dum and appoint the necessary box managers. The Act. Ryan F. Lawson, Chairman, Laurens Board of DistrictSuper- visors, brought out the fact that the supervisors are to determine if the Rabon Creek Watershed is aaministratiyeiy practicable and feasible. However, the euper- visors do not have the authority to make a favorable determina tion unless at least a majorinr. M the votes east ale to favor m watershed dUggiet Also, percentage of tfce votes east favor of the project will ha flvaa consideration, alosg with other items, by the State PriorityCoaj'- mittee in giving tke project a hl|| priority rating for plannlag assistance from the Soil Conser-v vatic® Service. C&166