The Clinton chronicle. (Clinton, S.C.) 1901-current, May 21, 1964, Image 19

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

'* - • ; r I I Federal Government is biggest owner in state Starting with no assets or prop erty in South Carolina 175 years ago, the Federal government to day values its holdings in the state at a conservative $1,159,- 029,000 (not including military equipment). If the Federal gov ernment's contributions to the state highway program, to Health, Education and Welfare activity, to agriculture, and to housing were figured in on top of this, total U.S. assets in the state would likely top the $2 billion mark. In land alone, the Federal gov ernment owns almost six per cent at the state — 1,129,243 acres. More than half of this is under the Forestry Service’s jurisdic tion and is still on the books at ’Tfee ridiculously low price of un der $9 per acre, its cost to the Government during depression days when it was striving to save the nation’s forests by purchas ing large blocks of land around the nation. Biggest single U. S. investment in the state is the Atomic Energy Commission’s plant in Aiken County. Constructed in the ear ly 1950’s, it is located on 200,831 acres of land which cost the Fed eral government $22 million — roughly $100 per acre. Buildings and structures and facilities pushed the completed cost up to $577 million. In South Carolina, first prop erty taken over by the Federal government consisted of light house locations along the coast of Charleston - in 1790. The 472 acres of land cost $500 at the time, though they are valued at $100,000 today. South Carolina was also site of one of the nation’s first forts — outside of Great Falls, S. C. Called Fort Dearborn, and lo cated on the Catawba River, it played a major role in the state’s v \ • V c . 1 ‘ ’ l « r . I i \ •r^\ r-'l / — vo m ; V« I t « | L | T ,-S A ,X / ‘WvTi waging of war to the west. In the nation, and around the world, real and personal proper ty of the Federal government are valued at $315.2 billion, a sum greater than the national debt, o The Federal government owns^ a total of 771 million acres of land, including over half of the states of Alaska (100 per cent), Nevada (85.5), Utah (66.2), Ida ho (63.8), and Oregon (52.1). At the opposite extreme, the U. S. government owns less than one per cent of Connecticut (.2 per cent), Iowa (.4), Maine (.6), New York (.7), Ohio (.8), and Kansas (.9). In comparison to other state’s, U. S. holdings in South Carolina are 15th largest. Federal hold ings in California are valued at $5,856,679,000, almost twice that of second ranked state Washing ton where real Federal assets come to $3,151,726,000. New England is the section of the nation which has held on to its own for the most part. Fed eral holdings in Vermont are val ued at the least, $71,926,000; New Hampshire is second lowest, $166,805,000, and Connecticut and Rhode Island rank fourth and seventh respectively. Surpris ingly enough, Federal holdings in three large Midwest states, Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin, Which Agency Owns What In State ? Agriculture Dept. Atomic Energy Com. _ Aviation Agency Commerce Dept. Health - Ed. - Welfare Interior Dept. Post Office Dept. Treasury Dept. (Coast Guard) Veterans Adm. General Services total civilian ' Army Air Force Corps of Engineers — ^Navy total defense —-- grand total A4 no. of AG7M of coat of no. of coat of other total land building* building* improTomants •valuation 8 587,772 $4,427,000 144 $840,000 $3,936,000 $9,262,000 1 200,831 22,583,000 346 294,156,000 260,384,000 577,123,000 45 9 1,000 17 . 166,000 55,000 222,000 1 0 0 1 * 15,000 0 15,000 1 0 0 1 129,000 0 129,000 13 140,563 673,000 231 797,000 2,766,000 4,236,000 40 ^ 18 483,000 40 3,518,000 0 4,001,000 14 642 118,000 41 ^ 572,000 1,379,000 2,069,000 2 114 54,000 33 2,440,000 362,000 2,860,000 12 14 822,000 12 9,336,000 66,000 10,224,000 137 929,962 29,220,000 866 311,973,000 268,948,000 610,141,000 15 53,718 3,432,000 2,824 29,632,000 28,146,000 61,210,000 26 17,569 3,716,000 2,677 93,117,000 73,981,000 170,814,000 8 98,208 27,289,000 19 164,000 69,931,000 97,384,000 19 29,786 4,002,000 3,175 119,853,000 95,625,000 219,480,000 68 199,281 38,439,000 8,695 2,42,766,000 267,683,000 548,888,000 205 1,129,243 67,659,000 9,561 544,739,000 536,631,000 1,159,029,000 come to only $257 million, $277 million, and $279 million in rank ing among the low nine states. In many instances Federal realty, which is very valuable, is recorded on the books of the Fed eral Government at a mere frac tion of its true worth. Some ex amples of such listings are: The White House grounds in Washington, D. C. (18 acres) are recorded at $1 thousand; the Mil itary Academy at West Point, New York, comprising 16,003 acres, is recorded at $83.1 mil lion. Its estimated replacement cost is $161.2 million; the Naval Academy at Annapolis, Mary land, comprising 1,190 acres, is recorded at $61.6 million. Its es timated replacement cost is $85.8 million. Real property under the juris diction of the Architect of the Capitol is listed at an estimated present-day evaluation of $459 million. Capitol Hill real estate, under the jurisdiction of the Ar chitect of the Capitol, includes the U. S. Capitol Building, Old and New Senate Office Buildings, Old and New House Office Build ings and grounds; site of an ad ditional Senate Office Building; site for an additional House Office Building and appurtenant facili ties for the House of Representa tives; Legislative Garage; Capi tol Power Plant, Main and An nex Library of Congress Build ing and grounds; U. S. Botanic Garden and Nursery. MAY, 1964 S. C. historians rate leaders What South Carolinian has played the most important role in the history of U. S. government during each of the nation’s 25-year inter vals? Put to the history departments of the state’s colleges and to directors of the South Caroliniana Library and the state’s Archives, this question brought forth familiar names and surprisingly little controversy. John Rutledge finished in front of Henry Laurens and Charles Pinckney for the pre-Constitution interval ending in 1789. Charles Coatesworth Pinckney was an overwhelming choice of the state’s 15 historians over cousin Charles, 1789-1814. John C. Calhoun was a unanimous choice for honors during 1814- 1839 and also received top recognition over Robert Barnwell Rhett for the period, 1839-1864. Wade Hampton for the period, 1864-1889, and Benjamin Ryan Till man for the years 1889-1914 were near unanimous choices of the state’s historians. Ellison (Cotton Ed) Smith was a narrow selection over Bernard Baruch and James F. Byrnes for the period, 1914-1939. James F. Byrnes was a unanimous choice of historians as leading South Carolinian for the years 1939-1964. Taking each period of history separately: As George Washington pre pared to take his oath of office as first President of the United States on April 30, 1789, he fully realized that the pressure was on him to make this new and unique government work. Those who had served with him during the Revolution against the British were confi dent that he would succeed in this newest endeavor just as he had succeeded in defeating the British after six and one-half years of fighting from 1775 to 1781. The climate was right for some semblance of central government after seven frustrating years of little or no leadership under the Articles of Confederation. Dur ing this period, the 13 original colonies (now sovereign states) wished to run their own affairs without any outside interference. It was now up to Washington, endowed with considerable pow ers under the new Constitution, to unite the states in peace as he had succeeded a dozen years ear lier in war. In South Carolina, particular ly among politically sophisticated Charlestonians, there were mix ed feelings about the new gov ernment. The state’s contribu tions to the American Revolution were second to none, and her well - educated aristocrats of Charleston had played important roles in all meetings of the states. Henry Middleton had been President of the First Continen tal Congress which met just prior to actual hostilities between Brit ain and the colonies. Henry THE SOUTH CAROLINIAN Laurens had served as President of the third Continental Con gress which put into force the Articles of Confederation. John Rutledge and Charles Pinckney were key figures in the creation of the Constitution, with Pinck ney actually pre paring a com plete outline of what he felt the Constitution should contain. Known as “The South Carolina P 1 a n,” t h e Ruiicdg* Pinckney outline found its way into 31 or 32 of the provisions of the Constitu tion. Rutledge, first president of in dependent South Carolina during the Revolution, a delegate at the First Continental Congress as well as the last, was on South Carolina’s presidential ballots along with Washington. Consensus of opinion among Charlestonians was that the new Federal government was a good thing — provided it didn’t get too democratic. Most favored a Republican form of government to avoid what Rutledge termed the “arbitrary, severe and de structive power” of democracy. These views were not necessar ily shared in the South Carolina up-country, where population was greater but political rights yet undeveloped. In 1789, population of the state was 249,073 as compared to the nation’s 3,929,214 citizens. The new nation’s professional Army consisted of 46 officers and 672 enlisted men. Debt as a result of the Federal government’s as sumption of state debts amount ed to $77,228,000. Tax revenue during the first full year came to $4,419,000 of which over half went toward paying interest on the national debt. National de fense cost $634,000, veterans ben efits came to $176,000, and other government expenses amounted to $1,286,000. There was a $150,- 000 budget surplus. During the first 25 years of Federal government, Charles Coatesworth Pinckney was sur prisingly ijminterested in employ mentby the new government he had aone ^o much to create. His key victory over the British at Fort Moultrie in 1776 followed by his service as an aide to Wash ington and his defense of the Constitution which he had signed led President Washington t o offer him at va rious times dur- i n g his two terms in office the following po sit i o n s: (1 ) Commanding Pinckney general of the U. S. Army, (2) Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, (3) Secre tary of State, and (4) Secretary of War. Pinckney refused all of these assignments. He was the Federalists’ vice presidential nominee under John Adams in 1796 but lost the elec tion to Republican Thomas Jef ferson. He also lost to Jefferson and his Republican running mates Aaron Burr and George Clinton in the elections of 1800 and 1804 respectively. C. C. Pinckney did serve his nation as head of a special mis- in M. Y« April M. 17M sion to France in 1797 aimed at resolving difficulties between the two nations. Refusing to com promise honor and principle, he shouted, “No! no! Not a six pence!” to suggestions that the United States “buy peace.” Re turning to the United States, he was made commanding general of the U. S. Army at a time war seemed a possibility. War did ultimately come in 1812, but against England rather than France. One sixth of the generals were South Carolinians, and in Washington, the brilliance of young Representatives John C. Calhoun, William Lowndes, and Langdon Cheves in The House and John Gaillard in the Senate helped in no small way to shape the destiny of the new nation as it entered its second quarter century in 1814. South Carolina’s population was now 415,115 as compared to the nation’s population of 7,239,- 881. As a result of the War of 1812, whidh ran through 1814, the nation’s debt rose to $127,- 335,000. The budget of 1814 was unbalanced to the extent of $23,- 539,000 as total receipts in that war year came to only $11,182,- 000. Washington, D. C., the new nation’s capital, had been burned. Twenty-five years later, in 1839, as a result of peace and Western expan sion, the nation was largely debt free and had grown in popu lation to 17,069,- 453. Migration to Calhoun the West of' many South Carolinians held the state’s growth down, though its population increased to 594,398. 3